You are on page 1of 19

Notice

1. The issues here actually have nothing to do with driving without a license or presenting a birth certificate in order to be issued such a license. The issue here is, "What, exactly, is it that transpires in the application and issuance of a driver license? Or, put in the context of this notice, how does a man or woman born free and sovereign over their own entity, become a "person" obligated to apply to an agency of a totally artificial entity in order to be issued a driver license? Or, is there actually any actual obligation for a living, breathing, flesh and blood man or woman born free and sovereign over their own entity, to apply to an agency of a totally artificial entity in order, to be issued a driver license? What is the true and actual purpose behind the surreptitious procedure preceding the issuance of a driver license? Is the issuance of a driver license the true and actual reason for the presentation of the "applicant’s" birth certificate? Or is there another more devious purpose for such a specious requirement? 2. The issues here are much more fundamentally important, having to do with honesty, integrity and an acknowledgment by those "persons" administering the government, that the purpose for the creation of government in the first place was not to create a monster to micro manage the lives of the common people, but, rather, to provide an orderly way for societal interactive needs to be provided for, such as water supply, sewage disposal, and the warding off of foreign tyrants, and was not for the purpose of establishing a home grown tyranny with the authority to require everyone to get permission from the government in order to use an additional square or two of toilet paper. 3. Article one section six of the California Constitution, and the thirteenth amendment of the United States Constitution clearly and unambiguously prohibits involuntary servitude. 4. If the prohibition of involuntary servitude does not include a prohibition of mandatory driver licensing then what else is there that the government of California may require the people of California to do against their will? A better question is, "What, exactly, are the limitations in regard to the government’s ability to micro-manage the lives of everyone in California?" And an even more relevant question is, "Where, under the natural limitations on government examined herein above, wherein it was established that government may not reasonably or properly be imbued with any more authority than the authority imbued by Nature into any one single living, breathing, flesh and blood man or woman, where, then, does the government get the authority to require any "person" to be issued a driver license prior to operating a motor vehicle on the highways of California?" Please note that I am not stating that the government does not have such authority, I am asking the question, "Where does this authority properly and reasonably come from?" (Well, the word "reasonably" may be a stretch, but there is no doubt that such authority has been legally acquired, at least as such authority applies to "persons", as the word "person" is defined in §470 of the California Vehicle code.

I am an alien to California. of course. the "someone else" being an indoctrination officer whose intention (knowingly or unknowingly) is to program the child to accept a condition of virtually total servitude. Again. How do I arrive at my comprehension of the intention of the Legislature? By actually reading the words they used and adhering to them. It is like playing the computer card game. paying attention to the grammatical manner in which the statutes are written. or being prompted to question the validity of the freedom negating information the "someone else" is indoctrinating the child with. without the child ever being informed of the existence of any optional independent political status. 6. breathing. and whether or not the living. written as they are. so that the definitions included therein are in full compliance with Article one section six of the California Constitution’s prohibition of Involuntary Servitude. that when born every human baby is devoid of even the most minuscule amount of ability to evaluate whether the information presented to it is good for it or good for "someone else". at the time they were born. born free and politically independent. so that the Codes of California. The issue as to who is required to conform under the California Codes is based on whether the living. a status to which I have not agreed! (As a side comment. I further contend that in my answer to the above question I will establish that the Legislature of California agrees with me on the issue of driver license requirements. breathing. .) 7. flesh and blood man and woman to procure a "driver license" prior to using their own privately owned self-propelled conveyance/household goods. Freecell. As afore stated. where you often must move single cards in the wrong way in order to be able to later move them in the right way. breathing flesh and blood man or woman has been successfully and legally induced or "seduced". to "volunteer" to claim to be such "person". 8. I would then be required to apply for a driver license under the codes of California prior to operating a motor vehicle on the highways of California. mine being that I have not volunteered myself to submit to the dominion of California by becoming a "person" as the word "person" is defined in §470 Of the California Vehicle Code. may be readily decoded by the astute reader. What I will demonstrate is that all living. breathing flesh and blood man or woman present in California does.5. every living. breathing flesh and blood men and women born on the land area claimed by California to be under its dominion. as I have reiterated several times herein. flesh and blood man or woman is a "person" as the word "person" is defined in §470 of the California Vehicle Code. breathing. I will answer that question herein below in regard to any purported requirement for every living. This takes more than a cursory examination because there is more to it than may be found in just one subsection of the California Vehicle Code. are. have a political relationship with California. and. the issue we are examining is much more fundamental than the matter of a driver license. Therefore. giving the Legislature full credit for creating the definitions to be grammatically correct as they are set forth in the California Vehicle Code. the issue of this is limited to examining and determining whether or not I am a "person" as the word "person" is defined in §470 Of the California Vehicle Code.

copartnership. To the casual reader it will seem clear that items (2) through (6) are artificial entities and it is will likewise seem clear to the casual reader. The term "driver" does not include the tillerman or other person who. To the casual reader it would seem the intention of the statutory definition of "person" is to legally establish that real live flesh and blood men and women are not any different from corporations like Walmart. (b)" An "owner" is a person having all the incidents of ownership. Be that as it may. when entitled to the possession and use of a vehicle under a lease. So. or the State. assists the driver in the steering or operation of any articulated firefighting apparatus. then. so. (c) "Person" includes a natural person. 3)copartnership. including the legal title of a vehicle whether or not such person lends. "yours"!). firm. The relevant California Vehicle Code provides: (a)" §305. but number (1) does not clearly indicate such to be the case. or any county.9. 6)corporation. A "driver" is a person who drives or is in actual physical control of a vehicle. (2) programming instilled in the child during (3) mandatory attendance in government indoctrination centers euphemistically known as "public schools". and proudly. rents.. in an auxiliary capacity. 2) firm. association. coupled with the word "person". when the word "person" is included in the definition of the word "person" such inclusion is either an unacceptable grammatical error or. 4)association. or the United States. where (6) the child now a teenager or adult "voluntarily" and eagerly. or "your" airplane. (7) presents "his or her" birth certificate in order to (8) be issued the much coveted California driver license. lease-sale. the birth of a person(a)'s birth on a birth certificate. having been appropriately subjected to mind controlling indoctrination. the term “Person” includes six items in the definition of the word person: 1) natural person. limited liability company. Reason will indicate that the legislature’s use instead. There can be no doubt that the legislators who created this statute were well aware of the words "men" and "women" which might seem to have been more appropriately used in the definition of "person". I will demonstrate a sequence of events starting with (1) the creation and recording of an event. a word cannot be used to define itself. somehow modifies the word "person" so that the inclusion of the word "person" in the definition of itself does not constitute a grammatical error. or corporation. or creates a security interest in the vehicle. more likely. the word "natural". or political subdivision of the State. 11. if it was the actual intent of the Legislature to legally equate real live flesh and blood men and women with Walmart. That is. the more astute reader will recall that we were all taught in grammar school that the definition of a word will never ever include the word being defined in its own definition. that is. the person entitled to the possession of a vehicle as the purchaser under a security agreement. (4) how the teenager or adult. 10. 12. or rental-purchase agreement for a period of 30 consecutive days or more. of the term . However. that number (1) is intended to refer to real live flesh and blood men and women. (The birth certificate the teenager or adult presents to the Revenue Office is as much "his or hers" as is "your" bus or "your" taxicab. district. city. (5) "voluntarily" presents him or herself to a local Department of Revenue Office. 5)limited liability company.

California." (5)" limited liability company " and (6)”corporations”. (2)"firms"."natural person". as included in the definition of the word "person" in §470 of the California Vehicle Code is intended to be and is also an artificial entity. Another question here is "What could have been the reason for the Legislature’s inclusion of five clearly artificial entities in the definition of the word "person" if the purpose of the definition of the word "person" was to indicate that such word was intended to refer to or include real live flesh and blood men and women? Clearly such was not the purpose! So. in order for the definition to be grammatically correct. as statutorily defined "persons" equal to Walmart. takes more examination and analysis. (3)"copartnerships". (f) all six are required by the government to have a government issued license. induced or seduced into "volunteering" Themselves into servitude. always grammatically correct. induce or seduce real live flesh and blood men and women to voluntarily submit themselves to the political authority of the artificial entity. entice. So then. and would have been otherwise undesirable because the term "natural person" is also a reference to an artificial entity. (4)"associations. 16. The foregoing explains how the six items in §470 of the California Vehicle Code are all six. So how does California do that? 18. how else do politicians "get things done"? This was not done overnight. Engaging in subterfuge and deceit. in order for California to be able to command subservience of real live flesh and blood men and women California must. The first discernment will be to conclude. in order to avoid grammatical incorrectness? 15. in order to discern the purpose we must examine the similarities of these five artificial items as they relate to each other and then examine and determine how these similarities apply or relate to the term "natural person". as I shall explain: 17. that is. I contend that everything ever written by any legislature is. many generations have passed thereby enabling the ploy to be gradually implanted in succeeding generations without hardly anyone ever questioning how it all came about. was clearly intentional. the legislators intentionally avoided the use of the words "men" and "women" because to use those words would have actually created a grammatical error. such mates being. through their human creating agents. similar in every significant aspect to its definition mates. as I shall explain as I go along. that the term (1)"natural person". artificial entities. (c) all six are registered with the government. how does the word "natural" modify the word "person" in order to avoid a grammatical error? 13. (d) all six have. (b) all six have official government approved creating documents. . the first item in the definition of "person". As no single man or woman has natural authority to command non-volunteers to obey. if nothing else. therefore. (e) all six have a name conjured up by their private sector creators and. all six of these artificial entities numbered herein are (a) created by voluntary human intellectual activity. last but not least. but the means by which real live flesh and blood men and women are enticed. That is. somehow. so there is no grammatical error in the inclusion of "natural person" therein. the human creators of California cannot possibly imbue California with authority to do so either. voluntarily obligated themselves to obey and conform to the commands of the California Legislature.

partnership. CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL CODE (30) "Person" includes an individual or an organization. proprietorship. limited liability company. firm. It is important to understand that when born we humans have no knowledge of any kind. individual. association.70. firm. corporation. It is important to be cognitively aware that everything that we learned and absorbed as children we learned from someone else or from our innocent observations. organization. "Person" includes any public entity. Our first teachers were. club. then.160. partnership. limited liability company. trust. or other legal entity.19. most likely. limited liability company. limited liability company. business trust. partnership. trust. it was the public school governmental indoctrination system and this is the beginning of our intentional downhill slide into being a "person" as the word "person" is defined in §470 of the California Vehicle Code. our own parents. governmental subdivision or unit of a governmental subdivision. partnership. corporation. "Person" includes a natural person. There is a combination here of (1) the birth certificate and its registration with and abandonment to the government. government or governmental subdivision or agency. or corporation. §470.1. CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE SECTION 3479-3484 3482. (a) As used in this section: (1) "Person" means an individual. "Person" includes an individual. association. corporation. (3) the Legislature enacting enabling legislation. And also in all other California codes that I can find. CALIFORNIA CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1235. association. organization. estate. or other entity. "Person" includes a natural person.210 1235. a driver license. and (4) the young adult’s burning desire to be issued their peer driven status symbol. or public entity. 20. or corporation. association. CALIFORNIA EVIDENCE CODE 175. trust. copartnership. or public or private organization or entity of any character. 11405. business.110-1235. corporation. CALIFORNIA PROBATE CODE 56.) Section K: . at about age five. "Person" means an individual. partnership. (2) the indoctrination of the populace through public education when they are children. (See Section 1102.

Part Q(17): Section 7343 is derived from: Part O:Title 26 U.C. Definition of term "person" This section continues in one place the provision now found in the various criminal provisions of the existing Internal Revenue Code. 7343. or member is under a duty to perform the act in respect of which the violation occurs. 2707(d).S. 7343.S. Part Q: Sections derived from other sections. 3228. 7343.or a member or employee of a partnership. Part P: United States Code Congressional and Administrative News Part Q: Sections derived from other sections. Subtitle F.. Sec. employee. (1986) Sections ~2: Derived from Sections the 1939as follows below: Code as follow below: (Derived from) ~1(s): 7343: ~2(s): 145(d). employee. or member is under a duty to perform the act in respect of which the violation occurs. 3793(b)(2). 2557(b)( . Sec. Sec. SECTION 7343 IN PART: Part O: Title 26 U. 1718(d). CHAPTER 75. 3 LEGISLATIVE HISTORY INTERNAL REVENUE CODE -1954 SUBTITLE F PROCEDURE AND ADMINISTRATION CHAPTER 61BINFORMATION AND RETURNS ~13: § 7343.S. see section 340.C.S.-For penalties for failure to file information returns with respect to foreign personal holding companies and foreign corporation. ~3: 894(b)(2)(D): (D) The term "person" as used in this paragraphs (B) and (C) includes an officer or employee of a corporation or a member or employee of a partnership. who as such officer. 894(b)(2)(D). 7343: Sec. Part P: United States Code Congressional and Administrative News ~1: 83 rd Congress Second Session 1954 -Vol. 3710(c). Part Q(17):. ~3(a): § 894(b)(2)(D) are under ESTATES TAX. Subchapter D.Section 7343 is derived from: ~1: §7343 is derived from the 1939 Code sections as follows: ~2: 145(d): (d) CROSS REFERENCE . Definition of term "person “The term "person" as used in this chapter includes an officer or employee of a corporation.C. ~1: Title 26 U. 1821(a)(4). who as such officer.TITLE 26 U. ~4: 1718(d): (d) The term "person" as used in this subsection includes an officer or employee of a corporation or a member or .C. TITLE 26.

for which the child has been indoctrinated to believe and . employee. by default. as well as a natural person. employee. AND PLAYING CARDS. who as such officer. who as such officer. becomes the state of California. employee. The word "person" as used in this part and subchapter A or chapter 23 shall be construed to mean and include a partnership. association.employee of a partnership. by such "birth". The term "person" as used in this section includes an officer or employee of a corporation or a member or employee of a partnership.. ~5: 1821(a)(4): (4) The term "person" as used in this subsection includes an officer or employee of a corporation or a member or employee of a partnership. or member is under a duty to perform the act in respect of which the violation occurs. By failing to reserve any ownership rights to the name the parents effectively inform the county recorder the name and then. 21. is old enough to volunteer him or her self into a condition of servitude known as "citizenship". 23. or member is under a duty to perform the act in respect of which the violation occurs. employee. at that time having attained the age where he or she is recognized to be a somewhat responsible adult. ~6: 2557(b)( : ( The term "person" as used in paragraphs (2) (3) and (4) includes an officer or employee of a corporation or a member or employee of a partnership. ~6(a): § 2557(b)( are under CHAPTER 23B NARCOTICS. who as such officer. ~4(a): § 1718(d) are under ADMISSIONS AND DUES. OTHERINSTRUMENTS. Although not realized by parents. also born into being a citizen of California. who as such officer. ~7(a): § 2707(d) are under CHAPTER 25B FIREARMS. It is important here to understand that it is the "name" that the state becomes the owner of.(a) PERSON . or corporation. At the age of sixteen years the child. the initial setup for "personhood" is when a newborn baby’s parents conjure up a name for their child and then enter that name on a birth certificate and the county recorder records the name and the other information entered on the birth certificate with the appropriate government recording office. or member is under a duty to perform the act in respect of which the violation occurs. company. employee. abandon it. ~5(a): § 1821(a)(4) are under CHAPTER 11BDOCUMENTS. or member is under a duty to perform the act in respect of which the violation occurs. who as such officer. At the age of five or six years the child is enrolled in government indoctrination centers euphemistically known as "public schools" where the child is indoctrinated for the next thirteen years to believe he or she was born into United States citizenship and is likewise indoctrinated to believe that through such "birth" he or she was automatically. DEFINITIONS. ~8(a): § 3228 are under Part V Narcotics. so the "owner" of the name. or a member or employee of a partnership. 22. not the child. Please take Mandatory Judicial Notice that it is physically impossible for a real live flesh and blood human baby to be born in an artificial entity or to be born automatically into citizenship of such an artificial entity. ~8: 3228: SEC. or member is under a duty to perform the act in respect of which the violation occurs. ~9: 3710(c):(c) PERSON DEFINED . 3228. When informing the county recorder with the information filled out on the birth certificate document the parents do not reserve any ownership rights to the name they conjured up for their child. ~7: 2707(d): (d) The term "person" as used in this section includes an officer or employee of a corporation.

How can a "person" be construed to be an artificial entity? Only by a skillfully contrived statutory enactment: 31. Thereupon. such persona being the "name" entered on the birth certificate. When the child’s parents inform the county recorder. 30. designated as a "natural person". 24. the presentation of the birth certificate had considerable to do with establishing that the applicant was thereupon and thereafter. 29. these young adults have been programmed to believe that he or she must present "his" or "her" birth certificate to the local Department of Revenue Office in order to be issued a California driver license. the young adult presents his or her self to the said Revenue Office where the young adult proudly presents "his" or "her" birth certificate. the actual transaction had very little to do with the licensing of the applicants operation of a self-propelled conveyance on the public way of California. 27. 28. The application for the driver license would be more properly described as an application for a license to enable the applicant to legally use government owned property. Such failure on the part of the parents constitutes the abandonment of any ownership interest the parents may have had in the persona they created and such abandonment causes the ownership interest to devolve upon the State of California. Among honest people. such property being the "name" entered on the "applicant’s" birth certificate. this is known as "fraudulent inducement". 26. As involuntary servitude is prohibited by both the Thirteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution and Article one section six of the California Constitution. and especially after entering "High School". the birth certificate created by the child’s parents upon the "birth” of the child constituted the creation of an artificial persona. under the artificial guise of an artificial entity. When the child was born. the applicant unknowingly and unwittingly agreed to function as a "person" under the persona. the young adult is issued an California driver license. 25. a "person" as the word "person" is defined in §470 of the California Vehicle Code. and then the county recorder records that document with the government recording office the parents failed to reserve any ownership rights or interest in the said persona created and recorded therein. after some testing and skill examination. During the first sixteen years of his or her life. an event was recorded on the birth certificate the child then presented the birth certificate as a driver license applicant. That is. the Legislators had to devise a clever scheme whereby it could be legally claimed that all real live flesh and blood men and women . Through the application for and issuance of the driver license. whereupon. thereupon the young adult has unknowingly and unwittingly relinquished the individual political sovereignty and independence he or she was born with and volunteered his or her self into a condition of voluntary servitude with the political status of a "person" as the word "person" is defined in §470 of the California Vehicle Code. as the term "natural person" is included among five other artificial persons in the definition of the word "person" in §470 of the California Vehicle Code.accept without question that he or she was automatically born into.

33.were subject to the statutes of California. "Resident" means any person who manifests an intent to live or be located in this state on more than a temporary or transient basis. 34. Additionally. Unless the provision or context otherwise requires. [Chapter 3. in an auxiliary capacity. The term "driver" does not include the tillerman or other person who. A "driver" is a person who drives or is in actual physical control of a vehicle. By cleverly defining the common word "person" to include several artificial entities and include among them the term "natural person" the legislators would be able to befuddle all but the most astute linguists. associations. copartnerships. which protections are in many ways very reasonable as corporate owners of property had legal interests to protect and legal obligation to be met. An act to repeal and re-enact the Vehicle code. as amended to the close of the Legislative Session of 2005] The people of the State of California do enact as follows: DIVISION 1. The following are evidence of residency for purposes of vehicle registration: (a) Address where registered to vote. §516. 32. these definitions shall govern the construction of this code. was totally missed by everyone. WORDS AND PHRASES DEFINED §305. Statutes of 1959. during their application for a driver license. assists the driver in the steering or operation of any articulated firefighting apparatus. limited liability companies and corporations. without the scheme devised being an overt violation of the Constitutional prohibitions of involuntary servitude. all to be persons with many of the Constitutionally protected rights of "natural persons". "Nonresident" is a person who is not a resident of this State. At the time the definition of the word "person" was "discovered" the attention was cunningly focused on the Legislatures defining of firms. Presence in the state for six months or more in any 12-month period gives rise to a rebuttable presumption of residency. the scheme they devised would need to make it possible for it to be legally claimed that real live flesh and blood men and women were subject to the jurisdiction of California. §435. In examining The California Vehicle Code we find additional definitions of terms having to do with drivers: California Vehicle Code 100. The fact that the term "natural person" included in the definition of "person" would be surreptitiously used to cause real live flesh and blood men and women to "voluntarily" submit themselves to the political authority of an artificial entity through their "voluntary" application to use the artificial persona "name" created by the filing of "their" birth certificate at the time of "their" birth. . In examining the California Vehicle code. except those who intentionally implemented the scheme. an artificial entity.

A "driver" is a person who drives or is in actual physical control of a vehicle. §460. firm. §305. and age limits. (g) Declaration of residency to obtain a license or any other privilege or benefit not ordinarily extended to a nonresident. Unlawful to drive unless licensed §12500. limited liability company. occurrences. (b) A person may not drive a motorcycle. Exemptions. The term "driver" does not include the tillerman or other person who. (i) Other acts. association. or those persons specifically authorized to operate motorized bicycles or motorized scooters with a valid driver's license of any class. or motorized bicycle upon a highway. the person entitled to the possession of a vehicle as the purchaser under a security agreement. An "owner" is a person having all the incidents of ownership. California Vehicle Code.(b) Location of employment or place of business. rents. Article 1. (h) Possession of a California driver's license. as specified in subdivision (h) of Section 12804. (e) Filing a homeowner's property tax exemption. unless the person then holds a valid driver's license or endorsement issued under this code for that class. or the United States. copartnership. or rental-purchase agreement for a period of 30 consecutive days or more. or any county. or events that indicate presence in the state is more than temporary or transient. including the legal title of a vehicle whether or not such person lends. or corporation. or political subdivision of the State. (d) Attendance of dependents at a primary or secondary school. or the State. or creates a security interest in the vehicle. lease-sale. motor-driven cycle. unless the person then holds a valid driver's license issued under this code. (a) A person may not drive a motor vehicle upon a highway. in an auxiliary capacity. except those persons who are expressly exempted under this code.9. . except those persons who are expressly exempted under this code. Chapter 1. district. Division 6. assists the driver in the steering or operation of any articulated firefighting apparatus. (c) Payment of resident tuition at a public institution of higher education. DRIVERS’ LICENSES. city. "Person" includes a natural person. §470. (f) Renting or leasing a home for use as a residence. Persons required to be licensed. when entitled to the possession and use of a vehicle under a lease.

unless the person then holds a valid driver's license of the appropriate class or certification to operate the vehicle. (a) The following persons may operate a motor vehicle in this state without obtaining a driver's license under this code: (1) A nonresident over the age of 18 years having in his or her immediate possession a valid driver's license issued by a foreign jurisdiction of which he or she is a resident. while driving or operating such motor vehicle as provided in Section 38025. while operating a motor vehicle owned or controlled by the United States on the business of the United States. while operating. and privately owned facilities for off street parking where no fee is charged for the privilege to park and which are held open for the common public use of retail customers. in a commercial vehicle. if transporting hazardous material. (c) A nonresident possessing a medical certificate in accordance with subdivision (b) shall comply with any restriction of the medical certificate . as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 15210. (2) A nonresident. or a Canadian driver's license and a copy of his or her current training certificate to transport hazardous material that complies with all federal laws and regulations with respect to hazardous materials. Nothing in this subdivision authorizes operation of a motor vehicle by a person without a valid driver's license upon any off street parking facility. a commercial vehicle. §12502. Person’s exempt §12501.9. both of which shall be in his or her immediate possession. The following persons are not required to obtain a driver's license: (a) An officer or employee of the United States. (e) A motorized scooter operated on public streets shall at all times be equipped with an engine that complies with the applicable State Air Resources Board emission requirements. a valid license with the appropriate endorsement issued by another state or other jurisdiction that is recognized by the department. "off street parking facility" means any off street facility held open for use by the public for parking vehicles and includes any publicly owned facilities for off street parking. within this state. for the type of motor vehicle or combination of vehicles that the person is operating. which has been issued within two years of the date of operation of that vehicle. as defined in Section 353. except as provided in Section 36300 or 36305. As used in this subdivision.(c) A person may not drive a motor vehicle in or upon any off street parking facility. 21 years of age or older. (b) Any person entitled to the exemption contained in subdivision (a). (c) Any person driving or operating an off-highway motor vehicle subject to identification. issued by the Diplomatic Motor Vehicle Office of the Office of Foreign Missions of the United States Department of State. having in his or her immediate possession. as defined in Section 38012. as defined in Section 15210. shall have in his or her possession a current medical certificate of a type described in subdivision (c) of Section 12804. except as provided in Section 12505. (b) Any person while driving or operating implements of husbandry incidentally operated or moved over a highway. except when the motor vehicle being operated is a commercial motor vehicle. (3) A nonresident having in his or her immediate possession a valid driver's license. (d) A person may not drive a motor vehicle or combination of vehicles that is not of a type for which the person is licensed. as defined in subdivision (c) of Section 12500.

(D) Other acts. renewal. or upgraded commercial driver's license pursuant to Section 384. (a) (1) For purposes of this division only and notwithstanding Section 516. A nonresident over the age of 18 years whose home state or country does not require the licensing of drivers may operate a foreign vehicle owned by him for not to exceed 30 days without obtaining a license under this code. 12503. (c) Any person entitled to an exemption under Section 12502. §12503. the department shall cancel the certificate and require the minor to surrender it to the department. "State of domicile" means the state where a person has his or her true. §12504.405 of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations. except that he or she shall obtain a license from the department upon becoming a resident before being employed for compensation by another for the purpose of driving a motor vehicle on the highways. fixed. (a) Sections 12502 and 12503 apply to any nonresident over the age of 16 years but under the age of 18 years. (c) Whenever any of the conditions for the issuance of a nonresident minor's certificate cease to exist. or events that indicate presence in the state is more than temporary or transient. Prima facie evidence of residency for driver's licensing purposes includes. and permanent home and principal residence and to which he or she has manifested the intention of returning whenever he or she is absent. issued by the foreign jurisdiction. or 12504 may operate a motor vehicle in this state for not to exceed 10 days from the date he or she establishes residence in this state. (d) If the State of California is decertified by the federal government and prohibited from issuing an initial. (b) Any nonresident over the age of 16 years but under the age of 18 years who is a resident of a foreign jurisdiction which requires the licensing of drivers may continue to operate a motor vehicle in this state after 10 days from his or her date of entry into this state if he or she meets both the following: (1) He or she has a valid driver's license. (B) Payment of resident tuition at a public institution of higher education. the following applies: . and who files proof of financial responsibility. The maximum period during which that nonresident may operate a motor vehicle in this state without obtaining a driver's license is limited to a period of 10 days immediately following the entry of the nonresident into this state except as provided in subdivision (b) of this section. (b) The presumption of residency in this state may be rebutted by satisfactory evidence that the licensee's primary residence is in another state. (2) California residency is required of a person in order to be issued a commercial driver's license under this code. the following: (A) Address where registered to vote. (C) Filing a homeowner's property tax exemption. in his or her immediate possession. but is not limited to.issued to that nonresident. occurrences. §12505. (2) He or she has been issued and has in his or her immediate possession a nonresident minor's certificate. which the department issues to a nonresident minor who holds a valid driver's license issued to him or her by his or her home state or country. residency shall be determined as a person's state of domicile.

having a valid driver's license issued to him or her by any other foreign jurisdiction having licensing standards deemed by the Department of Motor Vehicles equivalent to those of this state. in individual cases. G.9. or to any licensee whose license is required to be changed. certified.(1) An existing commercial driver's license issued pursuant to this code prior to the date that the state is notified of its decertification shall remain valid until its expiration date. (3) For the purposes of this subdivision. the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. The department may issue a temporary driver's license to any person applying for a driver's license. the department may issue. and while the department is completing its investigation and determination of all facts relative to the applicant's right to receive a license. except that he or she shall obtain a license before being employed for compensation by another for the purpose of driving a motor vehicle on the highways. or possession of the United States. shall obtain a class A or a class B license from the department before operating on the highways a motor vehicle for which a class A or class B license is required. The temporary license is invalid when the applicant's license has been issued or refused. When in the opinion of the department it would be in the interest of safety. except a territory or possession of the United States. as described in Section 12804. notwithstanding that the applicant has failed the written examination on the person's first attempt. the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.9. a person over the age of 16 years who is a resident of a foreign jurisdiction other than a state. the District of Columbia. or modified. Notwithstanding subdivision (b) of Section 12805. §12508. or the Dominion of Canada. the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. (f) Any person from a foreign country. (e) Subject to Section 12504. added to. (2) A person who is a resident of this state may obtain a nonresident commercial driver's license from any state that elects to issue a nonresident commercial driver's license and that complies with the testing and licensing standards contained in subparts F. the District of Columbia. or possession of the United States. to any person applying for renewal of a driver's license. (h) This section shall become operative on September 20. territory. or registered to perform physical examinations in the United States of America. a nonresident commercial driver's license is a commercial driver's license issued by a state to an individual domiciled in a foreign country or in another state. The medical examination form required for issuance of a class A or class B driver's license shall be completed by a health care professional. §12506. This subdivision does not apply to (1) drivers of school buses operated in California on a trip for educational purposes or (2) drivers of vehicles used to provide the services of a local public agency. 2005. who is licensed. territory. or Canada. and H of Part 383 of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations. the department may issue a temporary driver's license to an applicant who has previously been licensed in this state or in any other state. as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 12804. (g) This section does not authorize the employment of a person in violation of Section 12515. if the licensee has the temporary license in his or her immediate possession. may operate a motor vehicle in this state without obtaining a license from the department. to any . or Canada. A temporary license permits the operation of a motor vehicle upon the highways for a period of 60 days.

"a person” except in this instance. by implication. assists the driver in the steering or operation of any articulated firefighting apparatus.applicant for a driver's license."! How duplicitous can a legislature get in its endeavors to avoid revealing its true intent? 38. in an auxiliary capacity.” 37. because "firms". A "driver" is a person who drives or is in actual physical control of a vehicle. Upon the expiration of a limited term license the department may extend its duration for an additional period without fee but the duration of the license and extensions shall not exceed the term of a regular license.. that the "driver" mentioned therein. such as "firm". The clear intention here. The term "driver" does not include the tillerman or other person who. several items all clearly being some manner of artificial entity. "association". 35. and there are innumerable definitions of the word "person" throughout the Codes of California. None of these many definitions include the words "men" or "women". in the definition of the word "driver". "copartnership". In every instance every definition of the word "person" includes several categories of various artificial entities. a vehicle being towed by a motor vehicle. exercise. in an auxiliary capacity. etc. and "corporations" have no ability to climb behind the steering wheel and be "in actual physical control of a vehicle upon a highway or . is a person who drives or is in actual physical control of a vehicle.. In every instance the additional items included in such definitions are. 36. even in the subsections setting forth who shall be exempted from driver licensing there is no mention of any driver who would not be a "person" as the word "person" is defined in §470 of the California Vehicle Code. without exception.. In every one of these many definitions the very first item included in every definition of the word "person" is the term "natural person". assists the driver in the steering or operation of any articulated firefighting apparatus. "association". Throughout the Codes of California we find a universal use of the word "person". It is clear that this section’s intention is to convey.. to be a real live flesh and blood man or woman.” limited liability company”"corporation".. "copartnerships". In not one single instance could I find a definition of the word "person" in the Codes of California which included the words "men" or "women". a license limited in duration to less than the regular term. "associations". control over or steer. even though §305’s primary candidate to be designated as A "driver" is a person who drives or is in actual physical control of a vehicle yes. In the definition of "driver" in The California Vehicle Code we find: “§305. "copartnership". the term "a person" is not intended to include every artificial person included in the definition of the word "person". is to include only one specific "person" among the five artificial persons included in the definition of the word "person" in §305 and that "artificial person" is the "person" who presented a birth certificate in order to be issued a driver license and thereby "volunteer" to be included in the class designated as a "natural person" in §305. The term "driver" does not include the tillerman or other person who. “limited liability company” and "corporation" from the definition of "driver". This repetitious emphatic use of the word "person" is clearly intended to be interpreted by the casual reader as a reference to real live flesh and blood men and women without overtly including the words "men" and "women" in any way that would cause a grammatical error to exist in the definition of the word "person".. It is additionally quite clear that this definition of "driver" is intended to very clearly exclude "firm". The .

C. as was ruled by the U. 36 L. 99. The language of the act. punished or endangered. 1892 "In Pier Co. when the term "natural person" is intended by the Legislature to designate an artificial persona! 39.Ed. As SCOTUS stated. or "corporations" “limited liability company” OR "NATURAL PERSONS". or without the will to do it. If a literal construction of the words of a statute be absurd. 'willful' is used in the sense of 'intentional. the act must be so construed as to avoid the absurdity.Ct.S. 29 N. Clark. by the entity that was thereafter purporting to hold the living.. " "In the case of State v. "copartnerships". The court must restrain the words. & Ald.reason the Legislature could not and did not use the words "man" or "woman" in any of its many definitions of the word "person" in the Codes of California is because "man" and "woman" are not words that in any way lend themselves well in references to such artificial persons as "firms"." 40. evidently leads to an absurd result. Feb. "associations". 511. "To adopt such a construction would put a stop to the ordinary business of life.' as distinguished from 'accidental' or 'involuntary. would be prohibited on the basis of the principle of Estoppel. breathing man or woman as a child. v. by a literal construction [of the statute]. ABBOTT. Is it used in that sense in this act? Did the legislature intend to make the intentional opening of a fence for the purpose of going upon the land of another indictable. 12 S. An involuntary act is that which is performed with constraint or with repugnance. 457. quotes from Lord Coke as follows: 'Acts of parliament are to be so construed as no man that is innocent or free from [causing] injury or wrong [doing] be. The object designed to be reached by the act must limit and control the literal import of the terms and phrases employed. all of which were referenced by SCOTUS in HOLY TRINITY CHURCH v. [I]n what sense is the term 'willful' used? In common parlance. 1914 provides the meaning of "Involuntary" is as follows: "Involuntary. 266. U. J. 8th Edition. that an act done as a result of intentionally misleading indoctrination of the living. if done by permission or for a lawful purpose? * * * We cannot suppose such to have been the actual intent.S. 96. breathing man or woman who was fully and properly informed of all of the ramifications of his or her "willful" act prior thereto. 29. In the above opinion there can be no reasonable doubt that SCOTUS intended its explanation of the common meaning of "willful" to only apply where the intentionally done act was done by an living. To adopt such a construction would put a stop to the ordinary business of life. The previous careful analysis of the definitions of "person" and "driver" as such are incorporated in the California Code enables us to construct the intent of the legislature by use of reasonable interpretation and thereby avoid totally absurd applications of such statutes. 226.' Whatever one does intentionally. However. there is another consideration as to what may or may not be "willful" that the Supreme Court did not mention in the foregoing: Bouvier’s Law Encyclopedia 3rd Rev. Law. breathing man or woman to acts done as a result of the intentional misleading indoctrination. An act is involuntary when it is done under duress." 41. Supreme Court in excerpts from rulings thereof as set forth herein below in the following cases." . if construed literally.S. J. 3 Barn. Hannam. he does willfully. 143 U.

Bank. 10 N. 95 N. 49. Where the intent is plain. Palmer. People v. " " The following cases may also be cited: Henry v. 358. 530. 410. 1 N. 13 Pick. and yet it is not easy to discern the point of difference between the opposing counsel in this respect..S. It will always. Jackson v. taken with other parts. 358. 631. We do not mean that it may be used to add to or take from the body of the statute.' It would seem that offenses against the United States. S. 99 N. In its opinion the court says: 'All laws should receive a sensible construction. Lacombe. In the case of U. 43. 386. 152. 30 Vt.15 Johns. 482. Chief Justice MARSHALL said: 'On the influence which the title ought to have in construing the enacting clauses. 4 Gill & J. S. 743. or the retarding of the passage of a carrier of the mail. 220. but may furnish some aid in showing what was in the mind of the legislature. therefore. Where the mind labors to discover the design of the legislature. 479. People v. much has been said. S. but also to those objects to which the legislature intended to apply them. oppression.) but it may help to interpret its meaning. Neither party contends that the title of an act can control plain words in the body of the statute. It is clear that Bouvier’s meaning conveys that an act. Did the legislature intend to apply these words to the subjects of a foreign power. Back to SCOTUS in Holy Trinity: " In U. Y. 558. 599. 2 Cranch. 17 Vt. 486 "The question as to the sufficiency of this plea was certified to this court. even though intentionally done. 610. is not "willfully" done when done under duress. Additionally. Ingraham v. The reason of the law in such cases should prevail over its letter.284. Speed.554. and will have its due share of consideration. 462]Commissioners. 3 Wheat. The title of this act is. Collins. 525. the same judge applied the doctrine in this way: 'The words of the section are in terms of unlimited extent. nothing is left to construction. v. Ex parte Ellis. (Hadden v. 374. 7 Wall. S. As . 'An act for the punishment of certain crimes against the United States. v. 107. Tilson. Oates v. Insurance Co. Y. Burch v. who in a foreign ship may commit murder or robbery on the high seas? The title of an act cannot control its words. People v. General terms should be so limited in their application as not to lead to injustice. the general application of the common word "person" has been supplanted by the mere fact that the Legislature of California has created a statutory definition of this word and the statutory meaning contrived by the Legislature must be applied in accordance with the clear intent of such Legislature. Ryegate v. Crane. Osgood v. Fisher. and it not an obstruction of the mail.' And in the case of U. 12 Mass. But general words must not only be limited to cases within the jurisdiction of the state. be presumed that the legislature intended exceptions to its language which would avoid results of this character. Wardsboro. Newbury. 239. there are still limitations as to the application thereof. 100 U. it seizes everything from which aid can be derived. " "Among other things which may be considered in determining the intent of the legislature is the title of the act. 3 Cow. or an absurd consequence. In this instant case. 5 Wall. 43. not offenses against the human race. 30 Miss.42. [143 U. Y. However true that may be. Chesapeake& Ohio Canal Co. E. 11 Cal. Wilbur v. were the crimes which the legislature intended by this law to punish. Co. " 44. Collector.. v. in the foregoing SCOTUS opined that where a literal application of the wording of a statute would result in an absurd result. 89. 457. and in such case the title claims a degree of notice. within the meaning of the act. it may assist in removing ambiguities. Breed. and neither denies that. v. Baltimore & Ohio R. The words 'any person or persons' are broad enough to comprehend every human being. the wording must "restrain the words". Rep. Kirby.

the statutory definition of each supports the statutory definition of the other. 8th Edition. the Legislature’s clearly demonstrated that their intent to supplant the commonly understood meaning of the word "person" to specifically exclude real live flesh and blood men and women. It is clearly the intention of the Legislature to exclude real live flesh and blood men and women from both! 47. An involuntary act is that which is performed with constraint or with repugnance. but then. voluntarily agreed to submit them self to the authority of the government of the artificial entity. breathing men and woman who have not willingly. And when California was not the actual perpetrator of the criminal indoctrination of the living. California. in order to extend the authority of California beyond its constitutionally established boundaries. breathing man or woman was a child. California intentionally attempts to reap benefits from the wrongful indoctrination of its criminal contemporaries. or without the will to do it. As the Constitution of both the United States and California prohibit involuntary servitude the Legislature cannot and did not use phraseology such as (or similar to) "all persons"." 49. being fully informed of the negative consequences thereof prior thereto. 48. SCOTUS therein opined that a state may not. 1914 provides the meaning of "Involuntary" as follows: "Involuntary. on that issue. breathing men and woman when the living. By the Legislature’s failure to include the words "men" and "women" in the statutory definition of the word "person". the issue of whether there might be or is a birth certificate I could use in order for me to be issued an California driver license is a totally moot issue! Bouvier’s Law Encyclopedia 3rd Rev. expand the State’s authority beyond its reasonable boundaries. the governments or the other Forty-nine states of the Federation known as the United . 46. An act is involuntary when it is done under duress. knowingly and intentionally. 45. why should I? Can it be reasonably denied that I have the natural born and naturally acquired right to determine for myself whether or not I will "volunteer"? Until I willingly. that issue is of no immediate significance! However. Bouvier’s meaning of "wilful" applies equally to an individual who was intentionally indoctrinated with lies in order to seduce him into "voluntarily" complying with California codes. if this were not true the Legislators would have included the words "men" and "women" in its definition of the word "person". voluntarily agree to submit myself to the authority of the government of the artificial entity. and would have included the words "men" and "women" in its statutory definition of the common word "driver". "An act is involuntary when it is done as a result of having been intentionally and wrongfully indoctrinated by the lying government of California. When taken together the definitions of the words "person" and the word "driver" are complementary. California." 50. later. The issue here is not whether or not I could use some birth certificate in order to be issued a driver license. through the general application of common words or phraseology. being fully informed of the negative consequences thereof prior thereto. knowingly and intentionally.stated in the above HOLY TRINITY excerpt. The inclusion of such phraseology in the statutes of California may not be construed to in any way unconstitutionally expand such limited authority in order to unconstitutionally extend such authority over living.

as I wrote herein above.States. I am not and did not consent to be a party to the undertaking. JOHN HENRY SMITH. "fiduciary". For example. individual. The issue here. in the nature of a position of trust or holding confidence.C. etc. sir or any other artificial label/entity! I am simply a Living. "U. California. is honesty and integrity of government in its relations with the general populace. but only notice of use.. by and through its Registered Name. As OBLIGEE/GRANTOR and DONOR for all credit to the UNITED STATES. to act primarily for the benefit of another in matters connected with his undertaking. An attorney has a fiduciary relationship with his client. bone and blood sentient man created in the image of my creators. 3113 . whoever. as my GIFT to the UNITED STATES on the condition all debt be canceled and retired and never reissued. a trustee has a fiduciary obligation to the beneficiary of a trust and acts as a fiduciary in his management of the trust property. breathing. you. nor do I have actual or constructive possession of the original Certificate of Live Birth. The inclusion of this photocopy is not to be construed as an act or claim to the "name" upon that certificate. California thereby compounds its unforgivable insidious criminal activities! A key word and principle here.and do not consent to be recognized as a person. I forgive and Absolve all the debt for JOHN HENRY SMITH registered by the STATE OF California. I wave the right to. nor am I the fiduciary. Accepting gifts (a) To provide the people of the United States with an opportunity to make gifts to the United States Government to be used to reduce the public debt(1) the Secretary of the Treasury may accept for the Government a gift of- . The name associated with the debt is. and I own nothing.S. flesh.. Included with this notice is a photocopy of a certified copy of a certificate of live birth acknowledging California’s indemnity certificate of usufruct to the living spoliated owner. Use cannot be construed as a claim of ownership. A person having a legal duty. in absence of evidence to the contrary. derived of the original of the copy of the Certificate of Live Birth attached. in this particular instance such criminal contemporary being the government of the artificial entity. created by his undertaking. is ESTOPPEL! 51. I am the living man. Law Dictionary 4th Ed.

And lead vs not into temptation. Exactly when did one surrender allegiance to nature and nature's God for this? . the commanding officer will cause receipts to be given." Post-it to be stuck to COLB. for the support or other benefit of the Army or of the United States. but deliuer vs from euill: For thine is the kingdome. as it is in heauen. hallowed be thy name. can be seized only by way of military necessity.(B) an obligation of the Government included in the public debt made only on the condition that the obligation be canceled and retired and not reissued. Thy kingdome come. Thy will be done. If the owner has not fled. and the glory. and the power. Amen. As codified in #38 of the 1868 Lieber code "38. which may serve the spoliated owner to obtain indemnity. " 1611 king james authorized version Our father which art in heauen. Giue vs this day our daily bread. Private property. for euer. in earth. And forgiue vs our debts. unless forfeited by crimes or by offenses of the owner. as we forgiue our debters.