This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
1007/s10437-009-9061-5 O R I G I N A L A RT I C L E
Variability in Eritrea and the Archaeology of the Northern Horn During the First Millennium BC: Subsistence, Ritual, and Gold Production
Peter R. Schmidt
Published online: 26 January 2010 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010
Abstract Around the margins of Asmara, Eritrea, hundreds of sites dating to the early and mid-first millennium BC have been documented. They range from single family dwellings to small and large hamlets, small and large villages, and small towns. We call these Ancient Ona sites, using the Tigrinya term for ruin. Our findings testify to significant subsistence, ritual, and economic variation within a region of 12 by 17 km: (1) different subsistence strategies in the well-watered, open basin to the west of Asmara (emmer wheat, barley; cattle) compared to the uplands north and east of Asmara (lentil, teff; goats/sheep); (2) ritual events, marked by stone bulls' heads and a huge ash deposit at Sembel Kushet, that brought people together in rites of passage and intensification during Meskel-like ceremonies, including ritual exchange; and (3) the exploitation of gold north of Asmara among heterarchically organized communities that exchanged specialized products within this region. Résumé Aux environs d’Asmara, en Erythrée, des centaines de sites datant du début et milieu du premier millénaire avant notre ère ont été recensés. Ils comprennent des habitations unifamiliales, des hameaux de taille diverse, des villages petits et grands, ainsi que des petites villes. Nous appelons ces vestiges ‘sites Ona anciens,’ en nous inspirant du terme Tigrinya désignant une ruine. Nos trouvailles démontrent une diversité considérable en matière d’économie, de moyens subsistance, et pratiques rituelles dans une région de 12 par 17 kilomètres: 1) Les stratégies de subsistance employées dans le bassin ouvert et bien arrosé a l’ouest d’Asmara (amidonnier, avoine, bovins) diffèrent de celles en usage dans les hautes terres au nord et à l’est
P. R. Schmidt (*) 20924 NE 132nd Ave, Waldo, FL 32694, USA e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Afr Archaeol Rev (2009) 26:305–325
d’Asmara (lentille, teff, chèvres/moutons); 2) Les évènements rituels sont représentés par des tètes de taureaux en pierre et par un dépôt énorme de cendres à Sembel Kushet; ils rassemblaient les gens dans des rites de passage et rites d’intensification similaires à ceux des cérémonies de Meskel; 3) Au nord d’Asmara, l'or était exploité par des communautés ‘hétérarchiques’ impliquées dans des échanges de produits spécialisés dans la région. Keywords Eritrea . Ancient Ona . ‘Pre-Aksumite’ . Ritual . Gold . Bulls’ heads
Introduction In the view of some scholars, ‘Pre-Aksumite’ means a period of time in the northern Horn when there is evidence for Sabaean influences from the Arabian Peninsula (Drewes 1962; de Contenson 1981; Schneider 1976; Anfray 1968, 1990), even using the term ‘Sabaean’ to designate a developmental period in the mid-first millennium BC. As David Phillipson (2009) has observed, “Sometimes ‘Ethio-Sabaean’ and ‘Pre-Aksumite’ were seen as successive stages, sometimes both were attributed to a ‘Pre-Aksumite’ period.” These influences—whether in the form of appropriated material culture used by local elites or more direct contact with the Sabaean world—are defining attributes that mark off this time period from other post-Holocene cultural periods in the northern Horn. Mere reference to the ‘Pre-Aksumite’ has taken on symbolic power—becoming a trope for an era of foreign influence, an era when local cultures accommodated and co-opted such influences to transform into the proto-Aksumite and then into what we know as the political-geographic entity Aksum. The use of ‘Pre-Aksumite’ has introduced a problematic terminology in the archaeology of the northern Horn by privileging cultural influences external to the Horn and thus submerging local innovations and developments. This paper takes a path away from the homogenizing effects of tropic categories that typify archaeological classification. By examining the archaeology of the Greater Asmara region, I step back from the homogenization of local developments under the ‘Pre-Aksumite’ label and instead shed light on the regional distinctiveness of the archaeological remains around Asmara—illuminating how and why early first-millennium BC developments there diverged from other areas in the northern Horn (for map of the Northern Horn including major sites see Fig. 1). The first step in this process came when my colleagues and I designated the archaeological culture documented from 800 to 350 BC around Asmara as the Ancient Ona Culture (Curtis and Schmidt 2008; Schmidt et al. 2008b) precisely because it did not fit into the earlier tropic classification—lacking evidence for any Sabaean influences or dominant influences from the south. Incorporating the use of ‘ona’ by Tringali (1965)—the Triginya word for ‘ruins’—the Ancient Ona designation leaves behind some vexing cultural characterizations while also opening intellectual space to focus on variation within the northern Horn. Comparisons between the coeval early to mid-first millennium BC sites of Ethiopia and the Ancient Ona of Greater Asmara certainly show that there are affinities between these two zones within a larger region (Fattovich 2009) but importantly also affirm there are noteworthy differences that
1 Among the developments that distinguish the greater Asmara sub-region from other parts of the northern Horn during the early and mid-first millennium BC is the more detailed and nuanced knowledge we now have for subsistence practices across a geographically bounded research universe. the greater Asmara research throws considerable light on the question of local belief systems and ritual practices that differ significantly from what we know about other sub- In chapter 10 (D'Andrea et al. soil. and climate—a more finely grained analysis that allows us to see possible specializations in the subsistence economy of individual communities. The use of Ancient Ona (800–350 BC) is restricted to the greater Asmara area. we use Ancient Ona to replace references to the ‘Pre-Aksumite’ of northern Ethiopia—an extrapolation that is not germane because of differences discussed here. Moreover. Boardman and Phillipson 2000. Phillipson 2000). 2008) of The Archaeology of Ancient Eritrea (Schmidt et al. 2008a). 1 Map of the northern Horn. Heretofore. The research around Asmara corrects this deficiency while simultaneously providing a better understanding of daily economy linked to topography. 1997. it is now apparent that in matters of ritual life and ideology. subsistence practices that made up quotidian economic life have either been ignored in favor of a focus on exotic and elite artifacts or have been discussed only for a relatively tight cluster of sites at Aksum (Bard et al. showing principal sites discussed in this issue (Luisa Sernicola) testify to unique developmental trajectories deserving to be understood free of biasing labels. 1 . water.Afr Archaeol Rev (2009) 26:305–325 307 Fig. There is little evidence in the northern Horn for how communities varied across a sub-region in their subsistence practices during the first millennium BC.
better-watered plains west of Asmara (Ona Gudo.. Ona Gudo. I propose here to make finer grained examinations of subsistence. Mai Chiot. In particular. The first key observation is that food crops differed significantly across the sub-region. with hearths. Sembel. The ritual complex that I have interpreted and documented around Asmara appears in our mapping of quartz bulls' heads to have operated within clear social boundaries and to have been part of local exchange networks on the Asmara plateau (and a few neighboring areas off the plateau).308 Afr Archaeol Rev (2009) 26:305–325 regions of the northern Horn. and exploitative economy on the Asmara plateau to establish a comparative framework that goes beyond the commonalities that have arisen in the literature heretofore. This discussion is based on paleobotanical remains recovered through flotation after having been systematically sampled from excavation units and all features with ashy deposits. There are also particular exploitative practices. Fattovich 2004. 2008. conducive for planting and harvesting—also using oxen for threshing—large expanses of highly productive grains. with barley forming a . see Curtis and Schmidt 2008 for survey details. such as the mining and processing of gold in the first millennium BC. Curtis 2009). suggesting that ideas that link these bulls' heads with either rock art depictions or other representations of cattle in Arabia or the Horn only serve to erase the distinctively local quality of the phenomenon (e. Table 1 shows the range of crops documented at sites such as Sembel. I discuss five sites from which significant quantities of crop remains were recovered: Sembel. and that account for the wide variety of natural and cultural differences that occurred in the macro-region that we call the northern Horn. Here.g. 2. Table 10. Mai Hutsa. The open plains have wide expanses of fields within 2 km of permanent water and also hold small numbers of minor rocky outcrops. These communities relied mostly on emmer wheat (Triticum dicoccum) and hulled barley (Hordeum vulgare). Weki Duba) compared to the rocky uplands north and east of Asmara (Mai Hutsa and Mai Chiot). and Weki Duba (D'Andrea et al. and Weki Duba—all located on more open terrain. with quite different crop repertoires in the open. Subsistence: Insights Into Sub-regional Practices I want first to examine how subsistence practices varied significantly across a 12× 17 km research universe around Asmara (Fig. and ash discard areas providing the greater proportion of seed remains. This is an ideal setting for plow agriculture with the use of oxen. that help to explain some of the demographic clustering that occurred in the northern and western parts of the Asmara plateau— another developmental trajectory that differs from surrounding sub-regions. kitchen floors. the presence around Asmara of ritual objects known as bulls' heads allows us to develop deeper insights into how cattle functioned in the ritual life of first millennium BC people at a very local level and in a manner quite different from northern Ethiopia or even elsewhere in Eritrea. This again illustrates that knowledge about local variations helps to make representations about the first millennium BC that avoid homogenizing conclusions. ritual life. Buffa and Vogt 2001). Ona Gudo. The contexts for such recovery were particularly favorable.1).
the most extensively excavated site located above one of the few perennial streams and its associated rich bottom lands. 2008b).Afr Archaeol Rev (2009) 26:305–325 309 Fig. colored coded as per legend.16 in Schmidt et al. Fig. 6. where 77% . While the gross frequencies of hulled barley at Sembel are distinctive. Each survey grid represents 1 km2 (Matthew C. barley was also the dominant grain in the basal deposits at Weki Duba. Some 97% of the 115 hulled barley grains recovered from Sembel came from multiple hearths in middle strata in the southern kitchen area of Room B dating to approximately 600 BC (Table 1. Curtis) very large proportion of the grains in the deeper deposits at Sembel. 2 Sites of different cultural periods.
These results suggest that barley was the crop of choice during the first settlement on the open plains. It was found mostly in the earlier depositions dating between 800 . the bottom seven excavation units held 95% of the barley documented at this site.310 Afr Archaeol Rev (2009) 26:305–325 Fig. was not as popular in the gross frequencies but nevertheless was a key staple at these same three sites. Emmer wheat. at Ona Gudo. 3 Excavated sites around Asmara (Matthew C. also a widespread part of the Near Eastern grain repertoire. Similarly. Curtis) of the grains recovered from a kitchen floor were hulled barley.
In the Greater Asmara excavations. D'Andrea et al. schist outcrops. such as the fogs that flow over the eastern escarpment and hang over the adjacent plateau. one grain of teff was recovered from a sealed deposit in the Mai Chiot site in the rocky uplands. contra Marshall and Hildebrand 2002: 212). In contrast to the open. Teff has also been documented at Beta Giyorgis. it is not sample size that accounts for these clear contrasts. red burned earth associated with faunal remains and linseed—suggests the As D. fermented flat bread made from teff (Eragrostis tef). Mehari 2008). Phillipson 2000: 372. The distinctiveness of the uplands is also emphasized by the absence of identifiable hulled barley at the Mai Hutsa site and the presence of only three barley grains scattered through the deposits at Mai Chiot. lower plains are the rocky uplands where smaller patches of fertile soil prevail among many ambas (mesas). The staple bread of Ethiopia and Eritrea is enjera. Of the five sites discussed here. 2 .Afr Archaeol Rev (2009) 26:305–325 Table 1 Raw frequencies of seeds at excavated sites around Asmara Site Sembel Ona Gudo Weki Duba Mai Hutsa Mai Chiot Hulled barley 131 20 13 0 3 Emmer wheat 19 3 4 0 0 Bread wheat 2 0 0 0 0 Lentil 1 10 6 2 9 Linseed 29 20 33 3 5 311 Tef 0 0 0 0 1 and 600 BC. 1997). suggesting a fundamental shift in its role in the diet through time—a decline that is mirrored in the diminishment of emmer wheat cultivation in the Ethiopian highlands and other regions (D'Andrea and Haile 2002. we have reliable AMS dating for the beginning and multiple dates towards the end of this problematic period.2 an observation amplified by the virtual absence of emmer wheat in the later deposits. 2008). Reliable dating of teff in the northern Horn has eluded archaeologists for some time. and other steep and rocky gradients. 2000: 366). radiocarbon dating between the eighth and fifth centuries BC is problematic because of variations in atmospheric C14 during that time. However. allowing us to reckon relative time through fine grained analysis of stratigraphic evidence (e. The presence of teff in ‘Pre-Aksumite’ deposits at the Kidane Mehret D site in Aksum has been set aside as unreliable because the seeds appear to have been contaminated by later deposits (Boardman 2000: 365. these two uplands sites yielded no specimens of emmer wheat—fixing that crop exclusively to the open bottom plains. The context from which it was documented— compact. yet teff was abundant during the Aksumite period when it was the most common grain in the earlier phases (Boardman 1999. Phillipson (2009) notes. dated to the Aksumite and perhaps to Proto-Aksumite times (Bard et al. Mai Hutsa to the north of Asmara and Mai Chiot to the east of Asmara are the two excavated sites located in this topographic/physical zone. As Mai Chiot is a more extensively excavated site. Subsistence practices in this rocky zone close to the eastern escarpment may have been influenced by micro-climatic phenomena.. The dichotomy between the two zones is thus underlined by the virtual absence of emmer wheat and very low frequencies of barley in the upland rocky zone sites.g.
Curtis 2005). D'Andrea et al. was found throughout the plateau. Rather. but was more common in those communities bordering the open plains. 2008). perhaps linked to the heterarchical qualities of settlements and intraregional trade that balanced specialized grain production. 1997. Ona Gudo. Though limited to one grain. in relatively large numbers in a series of ash deposits and hearths at Ona Gudo dated to 770–350 BC and 800– 400 BC (95% cal. appearing in upper deposits at Sembel. linseed (Linus usitatissimun) is also found in all Ancient Ona sites in the greater Asmara area and thus mirrors the evidence found at the Kidane Mehret D site. Aksum. it is found in all excavated sites. Linseed. 700 BC. Importantly. but not Sembel. 2008)—that may be related to specialization of different communities. we find that lentil is only one of two crops—linseed being the other—that is not restricted to either the open plains or rocky uplands. the absence of disturbance and the secure dating to the second half of the first millennium BC is important for definitively documenting teff in the northern Horn diet at this time and the setting in which it occurred—Asmara's rocky uplands. Ona Gudo. many other specimens were located in a dense ashy layer on a basal kitchen floor and in the interstitial spaces in the stone floor. whereas the Sembel.312 Afr Archaeol Rev (2009) 26:305–325 presence of a hearth. each community making contributions to a wider regional distribution system (see Crumley 1995. and Weki Duba sites held 91% of the documented specimens—a very large proportion associated with the open. a shift that incorporated additional African domesticates such as finger millet and sorghum as well as Near Eastern crops such as lentil. This suggests a varied pattern—not associated with preservation issues (D'Andrea et al. there are many lower grindstones with a high polish associated with linseed deposits. Noteworthy at Weki Duba was the association of many linseed specimens with thickly sooted red ware pots midway through the depositional sequence. Barley and emmer wheat are clearly primary crops found throughout the depositional sequences of the western. An important oil crop. and at Weki Duba—mostly in deeper deposits associated with ash and grindstones. it is more important in the diet of open plains sites such as Ona Gudo and Weki Duba. In fact. whereas teff has been documented thus far only in a rocky upland setting. These two crops are not a prominent part of the uplands diet. Boardman 1999: 144). The Mai Chiot and Mai Hutsa sites in the rocky uplands held only eight of the 90 seeds documented or about 9% of the total collection. at the Sembel site. We also have strong evidence for cultivation of lentil in the first millennium BC around Asmara. Curtis 2005. We do not have sufficient settlement evidence for the Aksumite period in the . The presence of linseed at all sites however must be examined within the context of the two different zones in which sites are situated. The rich paleobotanical record at Aksum shows a significant shift in crops between the ‘Pre-Aksumite’ and Aksumite periods. Though lentil was also found throughout the Asmara plateau. and Weki Duba. too. open sites of Sembel. lentil occurs at Mai Chiot in deposits dated towards the terminal Ancient Ona (500–350 BC) from both middle and deeper deposits. suggesting that grinding to produce oil was an important component of the subsistence economy and perhaps even for intraregional and interregional trade of linseed oil. and grass pea (Bard et al. dated to ca. This evidence points to lentil being an important pulse and an integral part of the diet throughout the Ancient Ona period. In the rocky uplands. McIntosh 1998). lower plains. in terms of general importance in the diet. and at Mai Hutsa lentil is found in hearth debris dating to 830–420 BC (95% cal. pea.
In contrast. Sembel is less definitive. Subsistence and Domestic Animals The previous observations about intraregional variations also extend to pastoral life through the consumption of animals. these communities appear to be more restricted in their productive capacity and crop repertoire. While some growing or consumption of linseed. If we look at the sub-region as a whole in terms of total frequencies of domestic animals represented in our collections from six excavated sites. The contrasts between uplands and open plains communities take on greater vividness when we compare Mai Chiot from the uplands and Ona Gudo from the plains as proxies for the two zones in the sub-region. the lower and open plains show a plethora of evidence for the barley and emmer wheat staples as well as linseed. and small ungulate-sized specimens. Different subsistence practices. goats and sheep were far more prominent in the rocky upland areas. although (as indicated above) lentil is much earlier than at Aksum. Mai Chiot provides good evidence for an integrated or even-part distribution of meat cuts. This finely nuanced system of production. goats. barley. then . alerts us to the likelihood that such variations express the heterarchical qualities of specialized contemporary communities and that such patterns may also have prevailed in other sub-regions of the northern Horn—something to keep in mind before we rush to characterizations based on any sub-region to typify a larger region. But this generalization is potentially misleading for the sub-region because the picture is skewed by the much larger number of small ungulates at Mai Chiot and Mai Hutsa in the rocky uplands. as does Mai Hutsa—the other uplands site. and topography are significant reminders that variation at a sub-regional level such as the Asmara plateau is central for understanding variation across the entire region. closely linked to soil types. 4a and b). especially in the virtual absence of emmer wheat. suggesting clear divisions between ecological/topographic zones.Afr Archaeol Rev (2009) 26:305–325 313 greater Asmara sub-region to inquire into possible parallel shifts there. In contrast. In the three communities in the open plains. there is a greater frequency of axial cuts (vertebrae and ribs). Such a scenario does not apply—using MNI—to the communities located near the intensively cultivated areas in the open plains such as Sembel Kushet and Ona Gudo. where Bos/large ungulates dominate most of the faunal profiles (Fig. A more detailed discussion of the distribution of different body parts (Shoshani et al. proximity to water. since the Ancient Ona Culture was an agropastoral economy. The differences that appear in food crops are mimicked in the different husbandry and butchery practices that distinguished the people of the open plains from those of the rocky uplands. though not always lentil. keeping in mind that the large ungulates have much higher nutritional value. Cattle consumption was greater in the open areas where oxen would also have been used for cultivation and threshing. 2008) shows that a contrast between uplands and plains sites appears only when body part frequencies are examined for sheep. with equal numbers of small and large ungulates. then there appear to be more small ungulates (mostly Capra/Ovis) than large ungulates (mostly Bos). If we envision the sub-region as an integrated economy. and lentil apparently occurred in the uplands. perhaps balanced through exchange via kinship networks.
. 5). Schmidt and Naty 2008). Schmidt and Curtis 2001. such exchange occurred over several kilometers and up to an hour's journey by foot. 4 a and b. 1.b) sites to show dominance of cattle in the open plains and sheep/goats/small ungulate-sized animals in the uplands (Shoshani et al. Ritual—The Search for Meaning The second topic that invites examination for cultural variation within the sub-region is the production and distribution of what have been described as ritual bulls' heads (Tringali 1965. Their general classification—using the triangular frontal view of Bos—does not capture the variation found in this category of artifact. and linseed or linseed oil (and possibly beer made from barley) moving from the open plains to the uplands in exchange for easily transportable cuts of sheep and goat meat. This integrated perspective on intraregional exchange may also help us to understand some of the crop specializations that we see in the paleobotanical record—with surplus grains such as processed emmer wheat. 1.314 Fig. 1967. barley. elongated. 1978. Histograms showing the contrasts between the plains (Fig. Many objects are rounded. 2008) Afr Archaeol Rev (2009) 26:305–325 the higher frequency of axial cuts in the lowlands may represent exchange coming from the uplands where the better cuts remained for local consumption along with other axial cuts. Mostly stone objects—along with some ground potsherd examples—made by both chipping and grinding (Fig. these artifacts are found in a variety of Ancient Ona sites concentrated along the northern and western zones of the Asmara plateau.2a) and rocky uplands (Fig.
a term that elicits comparison to the Sabaean crescent and circle. while others resemble 12–15 cm wide. He does object however to our interpretation that they should be treated as a local phenomenon and not seen as derivative from other regions such as the Arabian Peninsula: “Such an extreme approach may please some Eritrean intellectuals and politicians. and pottery (upper left). The absence of standardization may point . and those who worship at the altar of political correctness” (Fattovich 2008: 347). An appraisal of the objects represented in Fig. but he does not specifically suggest that these particular objects of the Ancient Ona were the result of such contact and cultural influence. and depart from a triangular norm. the complete absence of any Near Eastern artifacts associated with bulls' heads in Ancient Ona communities and their contiguous multipurpose sites incisively affirms that these objects belong exclusively to local expressive culture. Fattovich (1997a. The wide variation in style and the quality of craftsmanship may indicate a level of craft skill that was not highly developed. or a varied familiarity with production techniques. Any argument for an Arabian connection would be misleading in this setting. excavated at the Sembel site 315 stubby. 2000) favored the idea that images of bulls in the northern Horn are linked to the Arabian Peninsula. The excavation of such an artifact (Fig. 6) at Sembel provides some clues: a ground-stone object with a hump between opposed. b.Afr Archaeol Rev (2009) 26:305–325 Fig. 5 Ground stone bulls' heads made from metavolcanics. tapered points may be recognized as representing a humped Zebu (Bos indicus)—lending confidence that the intended representation is indeed a bovid. we find that the exceptions to the norm provide deep insights. also referring to them as ‘crescents’. a trenchant critique that diminishes the importance of these significant findings rendered in stone—not found elsewhere in the northern Horn let alone the Arabian Peninsula. As we search for intentionality in these collections. 5 shows that most are highly stylized representations of bovids. Some are diminutive—only several centimeters in diameter. In earlier treatments. though they do not capture the finer features of bovids. volcanics. Tringali seemed genuinely perplexed about what to call these objects. roughly finished blanks. There is significant variety in the care and quality of craftsmanship as well as the types of materials used and the scale of the finished product (Schmidt and Naty 2008). Yet within this large range of variation there is little doubt about which objects fit within the bulls' head category.
following Tringali's observations. a NiloSaharan-speaking people who now live in the western lowlands. and as an integral part of a rite of passage also associated with rites of intensification. though most are confined to the Asmara plateau. While there have been many speculative ideas about what these objects signify. and practicing a form of initiation where young men make clay figurines of cattle. They are not known from any other region of the northern Horn.316 Fig. have explicit oral traditions about their identity with the highlands. We first thought. and pottery) and the clear differences in the frequency of bulls' heads among large multipurpose sites suggests that activities associated with these objects happened in specific spaces outside the core stone-built communities and for very specialized purposes. possibly for sequestered ritual instruction of neophytes at initiation schools. indicus—the earliest known representation of B. Other sites with bulls' heads but without evidence of permanent settlement are those with large quantities of quartz float processed for gold. 2 and 3). One site. located in Survey Unit 118 southeast of Asmara and designated as K09. Tringali located bulls' heads about 40 km to the south at Gura near Dekemhare and about 38 km north of Asmara towards Karen (Tringali 1978: 62. I argue that these objects once functioned as ritual promissory notes. but they are also rites of intensification because they are conducted close to the harvest season when . a representation of B. 98. whereas the nearby K01 site had none (Fig. later giving them to the family of their betrothed as symbols of the cattle bride price they will pay upon consummation of the marriage some years later (Schmidt and Naty 2008). that these objects were limited to mounds covered with architectural stone that mark the Ancient Ona settlements of various sizes. as devices symbolically promising cattle as the first of several steps in bride-price payment. The presence of bulls' heads on these large multipurpose sites (no architectural evidence but plentiful grindstones. Using strong inference that draws on Alex Naty's ethnographic details on the Kunama (Schmidt and Naty 2008). 4. 2). Naty also points out in his testimony that these Kunama ritual events are rites of passage because they occur at a particular time (age 6–8) in a young man's life cycle. 32). such as those located immediately to the northwest of Asmara and east of the Hara Hot gold mine (Figs. lithics. Fig. indicus in Africa Afr Archaeol Rev (2009) 26:305–325 to variation associated with different social groups. Our comprehensive and systematic survey of 90 km2 on the Asmara plateau (Curtis and Schmidt 2008) shows however that they are also common on some of the multipurpose but low-visibility sites of the Ancient Ona period. 6 A drawing of the ground stone bull's head in the bottom center of Fig. but the possibility that these objects were produced by relatively unskilled young people also emerges as significant. Naty informs us that the Kunama. they are clearly significant for understanding ritual relationships that may once have prevailed on the Ancient Ona landscape. had 12 bulls' heads on its surface.
one that also accounts for its distinctiveness on the Asmara plateau.Afr Archaeol Rev (2009) 26:305–325 317 fecundity of the land and the reproduction of society are foremost concerns. This zone is not the result of domestic ash dumping—a process that usually entails distribution to agricultural fields in the sub-region. A second smaller concentration occurred just 1 km to the southeast at the Sembel site. the large number of these ritual artifacts and the distinct boundaries of the ashy zone ask for a more comprehensive explanation. where some 850 of the objects were recorded in the 1970s by Tringali (1978: 62) and where our student teams also observed several dozen on the surface (also see Habtemichael 2000). where large numbers of bulls' heads have been documented . The most significant concentration of bulls' heads has been documented at Sembel Kushet (Figs. 3 and 7). 7 Map of Sembel Kushet. The key characteristic is the ashy zone in the western part of the site. large numbers of people would have gathered together while using such symbolic capital. Rather. Given that many different families in different communities may have been engaged in such rituals. In the rich historical and ethnographic corpus of the Horn. What captures our attention on the Asmara plateau is the variety and proportion of bulls' heads at Sembel Kushet and their dense concentration in a large and deep ashy area. one particular rite emerges as a compelling inference: the Fig. The bulls' heads on the Asmara plateau are concentrated in the core zone of the open plains. where cultivation of the primary staple food crops once prospered and where larger permanent towns were located.
Fig. possibly March (Ullendorff 1968) when. This pre-Christian fertility rite (Ullendorff 1968). long ago wrapped into church liturgy as a means of capturing its potency. The performance of Meskel in a central location. it would have directly conflicted with Lent. The great profusion of ritual items— shaped like oxen—at the same locale further suggests rites of passage and rituals of intensification in which fertility and human reproduction were featured: in this instance with exchange of symbolic bride-price objects during a large public ceremony in which oxen are the most prominent feasting food. These days the charcoal is removed and used by participants who mark their foreheads with Christian crosses as gestures of purification. chipped quartz specimens also occur. acting as a social glue in what are heterarchically or horizontally organized communities. the direction in which the smoke blows (Fig. leaves a large deposit of ash. but which in pre-Christian times appears to have occurred during another time of the year.318 Afr Archaeol Rev (2009) 26:305–325 annual Meskel celebration (Feast of the exaltation of the Holy Cross) that now occurs September 27. robustly suggests that the large ashy deposit on the western side of the Sembel Kushet site was repeatedly used—over hundreds of years—for a similar purpose. 2001 . 8 A Meskel celebration in Asmara. In many parts of the Horn it is linked to feasting on sacrificial oxen and it is a celebration of the fertility of women and crops—a rite of intensification and renewal that brings together large numbers of people within a region. with the future health and prosperity of the immediate region predicted by the direction in which the last burning logs fall. in exactly the same place as previous years. or in some areas. 8). leading us to ask if they were manufactured elsewhere but subsequently taken to Sembel Kushet for exchange. after the coming of Christianity. Though ground-stone bulls' heads are by far the most common type found at Sembel Kushet. the virtual absence of charcoal from prehistoric deposits suggest a possible parallel function in which bodies may have been colored with charcoal. Now a celebration featuring officials of the Orthodox Church. this sacred rite focuses on a huge bonfire (demera).
roughed-out blanks for these quartz artifacts. congruent with the larger flake scars on these artifacts (Schmidt and Naty 2008. eight of them chipped from quartz (Curtis 2005). The other site with excavated quartz bulls' heads is Mai Hutsa. Survey unit 142. Mai Hutsa is coeval with Sembel Kushet and has a suite of nine excavated bulls' heads. To gain a finer grained perspective. The closest excavated stone town is at Ona Gudo (Fig. respectively. We found that these quartz ritual products reached 4 km south to Daro Pawlos in the far southwestern sector of the research region (Fig. we examined phase I survey evidence from the Asmara plateau (Curtis 2005. indicating a specific manufacturing area—likely using large. only 2 km to the northwest of Sembel Kushet and across open plains: 17 bulls' heads were documented at Ona Gudo in one test excavation. Schmidt and Naty 2008) . 2. Schmidt and Naty 2008). 3). yielded four chipped quartz bulls' heads. The large size of the finished objects. 33 (one Fig. 9. Curtis and Schmidt 2008. while 2–3 km to the northwest. then we might also expect to find the production of such ritual items in other contemporary communities—in readiness for the general exchange at Sembel Kushet and/or local exchange. 9. Teka and Okubatsion 2008). The large numbers of quartz bulls' heads at Mai Hutsa come from several contiguous excavation units. Curtis 2005. there were three and two chipped quartz bulls' heads in units 88 and 98. If we go further afield to survey units 31 (one specimen). and the presence of a higher proportion of large debitage are archaeological signatures in the lithic record for the production of such symbolic capital. six of which are chipped from quartz (Fig.Afr Archaeol Rev (2009) 26:305–325 319 If this hypothesis about the ritual role of Sembel Kushet is to be sustained. where metasedimentary and metavolcanic materials prevail. we examined the quartz debitage from these excavation levels and found a significantly higher percentage of angular waste 2 cm or larger. We must consider whether communities such as Mai Hutsa and Ona Gudo produced specialized bulls' heads for exchange at ceremonial centers like Sembel Kushet. some of which are quite robust. Schmidt and Naty 2008). the absence of fine edge work. but without quartz.5 km northeast of Sembel Kushet in the rocky uplands. five specimens). 9. To obtain a better idea of the range of quartz bulls' head and their possible distribution networks into areas without such excavated evidence for their production. such as the middle specimen in the upper row of Fig. survey unit 154. 3 km to the south of Sembel Kushet. 9 Quartz bulls' heads excavated at Mai Hutsa (Curtis 2005. certainly a new direction for lithic studies in the Horn.
320 Afr Archaeol Rev (2009) 26:305–325 specimen). G. 2008c: 185) observed in mines that were reopened during Italian colonial rule (Tringali pers. An Italian geologist on a mission to investigate the Hara Hot and other mines in the 1930s reported that the Hara Hot area—now to the northwest of the Teacher Training College—figured prominently in local stories about Portuguese mining in the area (Usoni 1952: 138. Hatch. 35 (one specimen). survey unit 56). western. This suggests further that the bulls' heads cult may have been socially and geographically focused. Barnard. no specimens were excavated there during what was the second largest excavation around Asmara. Mai Chiot was a short-term occupation dating to the terminal Ancient Ona and may post-date the ritual complex. we see that the densities change to a gradient that is proportional to the 7–10 km distance from Sembel Kushet (Fig. This oral tradition possibly refers to mineral exploration undertaken by Portuguese living at Debarwa (about 35 km southeast of Asmara) during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. who in 1902 reported that deep mines with pottery and stone hammers were observed at both Schmugle and Medrizien before they were reopened—mines that became the largest producers during the Italian era (Blackburn 2003: 9). It is independently repeated by C. it appears that exchange was mediated by the ritual and redistributive hub of Sembel Kushet. Mai Chiot lacks bulls' heads on its surface. with its unique crop repertoire. 2). I now turn to the mining and the processing of gold around Asmara by Ancient Ona and later communities. or it may simply have been outside the social orbit of such ritual activity. where feasting and large gatherings accompanied rites of passage and intensification around a Meskel-like demera—leading to the spread of these objects around the northern. Surface and excavated examples show clearly that bulls' heads are virtually absent from the eastern rocky uplands zone. and its uniqueness as the only community to rely partly on wild game in its diet—all of these attributes when compared to the communities in the open plains mirror its separation from the bulls' heads ritual complex. including the presence of material culture such as Ancient Ona pottery and particularly tina cups—small terracotta vessels with vertical walls (Fig. H. Rather.6 in Schmidt et al. and 28 (one specimen). The uniqueness of Mai Chiot. The exploitation of gold is attested to by a variety of evidence. Usoni 1952). May 19. among them F. 2 and 3. an observation that parallels and affirms other significant variations within the sub-region. and southwestern plateau. 2002). 17 (two specimens). 8. . Figs. comm. then one would expect higher densities given the proximity of Mai Hutsa to these survey units. May these latter specimens have derived from a nearby community such as Mai Hutsa? If so. an English geologist. its different domestic animal diet. Other reports of ancient workings are found in both Italian and British records (Barnard 1941. A Point of Continuity: Gold and the Exploitative Economy When discussing quotidian economic life such as subsistence practices. one should avoid the temptation to submerge other variations in economic life— perhaps less definitive in some areas—for activities that may have contributed to the relatively large demographic size and prosperity of communities on the Asmara plateau. There are also reports by early miners.
He reported that the area around Hara Hot was exploited by Portuguese missionaries and came to be known as the ‘Portuguese caves’ (Barnard 1941). 8. This tomb shaft was evidently used to access an underground galley in the later Italian mine. 3).3). the evidence from the BE01 site in Adi Abieto and the remains at Emba Derho indicate that regardless of the specific age of the Hara Hot tomb. where an early Aksumite or Proto-Aksumite community was situated on an elevated overlook just east of the Medizien mine (Schmidt et al. The dominant presence of Ancient Ona communities dating to the 800–350 BC era suggests a higher probability that the burial remains date to that era rather than the later Aksumite period. There is no basis for assigning an Aksumite date to the tomb—it could as well have been Ancient Ona— but we now know that there was an Aksumite presence in the sub-region that pertained directly to gold mining. In any event. or southwest. 10) that once housed the tomb and that subsequently led to three of four galleries in the mine. 10 A sketch of the Graziani mine section at Hara Hot (after Usoni 1952).Afr Archaeol Rev (2009) 26:305–325 321 a British military administrator of the Italian mines during World War II. appearing on maps as the Gradino or No. 2008d) . there were “Abyssinian tombs of Mekeleans” or Aksumite tombs (Usoni 1952: 139). He observed that about 150 m to the west (sic). We believe. Among the more intriguing reports is Usoni's mention of the Graziani mine several hundred meters from the central processing area at Hara Hot. 2008b) just 2 km to the northeast as well as further afield at Emba Dehro. 2008d). 2008c: 182. the area had been exploited for gold by both Ancient Ona and Aksumite period miners (Fig. we have isolated what we believe to be the shaft (left of the elevator tower in Fig. Tringali's original research around Asmara led to Fig. now a mined-out crater with internal shafts. 3 mine (Schmidt et al. Using our intensive survey results and Usoni's detailed drawing of the Pozzo Graziani. the tomb shaft is likely the surface shaft to the left of the elevator tower (Schmidt et al. both at the BE01 site excavated in 2003 (Schmidt et al. Fig. from the physical evidence available today. that the principal mine before Italian involvement at Hara Hot was a conical hill. once marked by a steel elevator tower.
comm. allowing us to see more clearly the broader regional affinities and differences when we focus on local developments across a region. site MB03). That the crops grown in the western and open plains of the Asmara plateau appear so different in scale and dietary profile from those of the communities located in the rocky uplands is of significant consequence. Most are located in the open plains near schist/quartz outcrops with documented veins. 2002). northern. in crop repertoires. such generalizations erase the particulars of local histories so critical for understanding why significant differences. and northeastern part of the basin. for example. May 19. While we have not relocated these objects in his collections now housed in the National Museum. were located next to productive ancient mines (e. . arose over a 7–10 km distance in the Eritrean highlands. demanding that we better understand the exchange networks that compensated for these natural imbalances.. especially those situated near towns and mines. along with tina vessels in some reopened mines. Our investigations confirm his prescient intuition and further suggest that the largest towns of the Ancient Ona are those found contiguous to the gold fields of the central. These finely nuanced differences come to the fore with significant clarity on the Asmara plateau. and climate vary over very small distances in the highlands of Eritrea as well as other sub-regions of the northern Horn. The presence of an ancient tomb in a deep burial shaft. marking the processing of vein quartz for gold. Large multipurpose sites lacking architectural debris.322 Afr Archaeol Rev (2009) 26:305–325 his discovery and documentation of fragments of what he called ‘crucibles’ in mines of the Ancient Ona period. We have yet to observe any residues—sooting outside or other residues inside—indicating these artifacts were indeed used as crucibles. Ancient communities such as Ona Hashel and Ona Gudo. say. often contain large amounts of quartz float. topography. inspires confidence that his observation of these objects in abandoned mines underwrites the idea of gold exploitation by Ancient Ona peoples. he affirms that the tina we have documented are indeed what he labeled as ‘crucibles’ (Tringali pers. Though the Ancient Ona communities of the Asmara plateau can be characterized as agropastoralists who grew mostly barley and emmer wheat and who favored goats and sheep over cattle in their diet. however. The absence of emmer wheat at Mai Chiot and the minimal presence of barley must be measured against the plethora of these grains as well as the production of oil from linseed at Sembel. and Weki Duba. once archaeology in Eritrea re-opens to free inquiry.3 Tringali's thorough familiarity with the material culture of the Ancient Ona. strongly suggests that the prosperity of the communities on and fringing the open plains was linked not only to their agricultural productivity but also their proximity to and exploitation of very ancient gold workings—another characteristic that amplifies our understanding of the Ancient Ona. Ona Gudo. The agricultural production of the open 3 Trace-element analysis on these objects is needed. Tringali (1965: 152) was the first to notice the proximity of Ancient Ona communities to ancient gold mines.g. Concluding Thoughts Variation is often overlooked in our search for broadly applicable generalizations in archaeology. Soils.
These integrative activities. The communities living in prosperous small stone towns. local exploitation of precious minerals. Sembel Kushet also functioned as the social glue in a redistributive system of ritual items used in symbolic exchange for brides. axial body parts of sheep and goats in the open plains sites. rather than hierarchy in economic and political organization. oil. salt. We cannot hope to understand why some sub-regions in the northern Horn may show greater demographic complexity in the first millennium BC unless we examine ritual networks and solidarities. linking human reproduction and the land. but was confined to social groups that shared other common beliefs and practices. or a variety of other products. excepting the ritual cycles and their episodic expressions of hierarchy led by ritual officials who likely acted with significant political legitimacy as they also carried out their religious duties. This is likely the result of distribution of meat from the not-very-distant rocky uplands through kinship networks for grain products. among them the exploitation of gold. the ashy zone of the western side of Sembel Kushet—replete with huge numbers of ritual bulls' heads and filled with deep deposits of ash— appears to have been the locale for major ceremonial activities with affinities to contemporary Meskel rituals.Afr Archaeol Rev (2009) 26:305–325 323 lands—with their much higher productivity—was matched by the ideal conditions for raising and herding goats and sheep on the rocky uplands. and hamlets were situated in proximity to gold workings. when they rose to prominence through their harnessing international trade in the mid. and participation in local exchange.to late-first millennium BC. values that emerge when we examine how Sembel Kushet differs so significantly from any other Ancient Ona site. The production of quartz bulls' heads provides an unusual window into how local production of symbolic capital may now be recognized in the archaeological record. Variations in ritual practices expand our knowledge about the values associated with cattle in Ancient Ona culture. only returning to pasture on the stubble of the fields after harvest was completed. This ceremonial network did not extend to the entire plateau. while the communities of the rocky uplands practiced a parallel approach with their goat and sheep herds—favoring older animals that had greater body mass—a cultural preference seen even today. a process intimately tied to principles of reproduction and fertility. not a suitable enterprise near open fields of grain. beer. The cattle pastoralism practiced by agropastoral communities on the open plains would have required a herd management system with stock required to go outside the sub-region during the growing season. Management of cattle herds favored the harvesting of older animals once their productive lives as oxen or milk cows had been exhausted. villages. linseed oil. grain. A major place of ritual practice. kept secular authority at bay and provided sufficient unity to allow variation to prevail until such time that the hierarchical communities of Qohaito and Matara—about 100 km to the south—acted as population magnets. gold. As a center for important rites of passage and rituals of intensification. drawing together diverse and specialized communities with overlapping economic interests and social connections. All of this attests to specialist contributions by communities organized according to principles of heterarchy. or even beer from the western communities. be it meat. where miners left behind their material traces. The physical distribution of quartz bulls' heads in particular opens understanding of exchange networks that were cemented together by episodic and annual ritual events at Sembel Kushet. . The key observation to emerge from these variations is the presence of portable.
In D. The contacts between Southern Arabia and the Horn of Africa in late prehistoric and early historical times: a view from Africa. (1997b). 137–148). Teka (Eds. 6. Ethiopia. C. 9.324 Afr Archaeol Rev (2009) 26:305–325 References Anfray. 1–5). Journal of Field Archaeology.187. A. Asmara. (2000). Ethiopia. In A. S. Trade and travel in the Red Sea region (pp. R. de Contenson. Fattovich. Barnard. R. Aspects de l’archéologie ethiopienne. R. c. Contributions on archaeobotany. (1941). Curtis & Z. (1981). L. no. Archaeological Papers. 207–216). African Archaeological Review. Fattovich. Reconstructing pre-independence Eritrean archaeology: a case study and analysis of ‘bull heads’ (Senior research paper in Archaeology). Boardman. C. R. & Phillipson. Pre-Aksumite culture. & Perlingieri. Aksum and the Habashat: state and ethnicity in ancient northern Ethiopia and Eritrea. R. S.). Report on the Mines and the Mining Industry of Eritrea. Fattovich. F. Paris: Colin. Curtis & Z. In R. Levy (Eds. Rome: ‘L’Erma’ di Bretschneider. UNESCO General History of Africa. C. The archaeology of ancient Eritrea (pp. Trenton: Red Sea. In M. M. M. Les anciens éthiopiens. 800–400 BC. 22. (2004). Hamasian Goldfield.). (2003).. Parzinger (Eds. S. Schmidt. R. Vogel (Ed. Profumi d'Arabia (pp. E. R. Mokhtar (Ed.).. MA: Boston University African Studies Center. Curtis. The agricultural foundation of the Aksumite Empire... accessed September 15. M. R. (2005). London: British Institute in Eastern Africa and Society of Antiquaries. 412-14. Working Papers in African Studies 228. doi:10. C. (1997). A.). Avanzini (Ed. C. (2000). Fattovich. In J. D. Lunde & A. A. K. & Schmidt. W. In P. Blackburn. A.). 345–366. (2000). In G. R. 341–361). H. D’Andrea. British Military Report of 21 pages on deposit at the Ministry of Energy and Mines. Teka (Eds. (2008). W. (1990). 26. (1999). London: Heinemann. In R. Journal of Ethnobiology. (2000). (1997a). Heterarchy and the analysis of complex societies (pp. Oxford: Archaeopress. Walnut Creek: AltaMira. O. C. Ethiopia. Ehrenreich. G. The archaeology of ancient Eritrea (pp. Drewes. Anfray. Archaeological Investigations in the Greater Asmara Area: a regional approach in the central highlands of Eritrea.1007/s10437-009-9062-4. September Eritrea. Unpublished PhD dissertation.. Boardman. Phillipson (Ed. (2008). infomine. Inscriptions de l’Éthiopie antique. P. C. (1995). Boston. Buffa. (1962). B.). Eritrea. 387–404. Phillipson (Ed. (2008). 479–484). Crumley & J.. 363-8. W. In P. (1968). Aksum. G.104/search?=cache:75F8hKGwZ6EJ:www. M. 64–108). D. Ethiopia: an interim report. Curtis. Department of Archaeology. Manzo. Paleoethnobotanical analysis and agricultural economy at early first millennium BCE sites around Asmara. cultures and environments (pp. Porter (Eds.). Schmidt.). D’Andrea. L. P. 437–450). Bard. C. Arlington: American Anthropological Association. Fattovich. R. 268–270). languages. Archaeological investigations at Bieta Giyorgis. & Vogt. Journal of African History. 41.). International Journal of African Historical Studies.. Relating the Ancient Ona culture to the wider northern Horn: discerning patterns and problems in the archaeology of the first millennium BC. (2002).. University of Asmara. Boardman. Traditional emmer processing in highland Ethiopia. C. & Haile. F. New York: Kluwer. 2007. V. (2001). M. Bonn: Habelt. In D. C. Trenton: Red Sea. 71–77). Reconsidering Yeha. M. (2009). 24. 179–217. vol. Fattovich. 26. and places on the ancient Asmara plateau. M.). history.233. C. Archaeobotany. & Curtis. Eichmann & H. African Archaeological Review. J. Habtemichael.com/index/pa145277. Migration und Kulturtransfer (pp. London: British Institute in Eastern Africa and Society of Antiquaries. Independent Geologist’s Technical Report: Asmara Project. Landscape. Archaeology at Aksum. . 327–350. June 1941. The ‘pre-Aksumite’ state in northern Ethiopia and Eritrea reconsidered. C.). Heterarchy and the analysis of complex societies. 346–348. Online at http://64. 273–286). van der Veen (Ed. Leiden: Brill. M. 275–290. Archaeology at Aksum.. Encyclopedia of Precolonial Africa: archaeology. Schmidt. Book review: the archaeology of ancient Eritrea. Fattovich. 1973–1997 (pp. (2009). 1973–1997 (pp. R. people. Curtis. In P. 2 (pp. Crumley. Sabir – cultural identity between Saba and Africa. A. University of Florida. The exploitation of plant resources in ancient Africa (pp. The near East and Eastern Africa: their interaction. Eritrea. 468–470).
Curtis & Z. M. 47–98. Tringali.. L. R. Ceramic analysis of Sembel site: cultural stratigraphy. The archaeology of ancient Eritrea (pp. P. Annales d’Éthiopie. 16. M. London: British Institute in Eastern Africa and Society of Antiquaries. Journal of World Prehistory. Necropoli di Cascase e oggetti sudarabici dalla regione di Asmara (Eritrea). M. Archaeology at Aksum.). Teka (Eds... The peoples of the middle Niger. E. (2008).). Curtis. R. C. 143–161.. R. The archaeology of ancient Eritrea (pp. M. Rassegna di Studi Etiopici. & Naty. 257–274. Oxford: Oxford University Press for the British Academy. 163–177). C. 109–114. & Curtis. G. D. M. E. Curtis & Z. F. The Emba Derho site: an Aksumite period tomb north of Asmara. In P. Tringali. 247–274). (2008). R. R. Teka (Eds. Cattle before crops: the beginnings of food production in Africa... W. Schmidt. P. A. R. Schneider.). 235–245). Trenton: Red Sea. C. M. Bulls’s heads and enigmas: strong inference and interpretative puzzles in Eritrea. Les débuts de l’histoire éthiopienne. C. McIntosh. R. D. M. Schmidt. Curtis & Z. Schmidt. & Okubatsion. Lithic artifacts from archaeological sites in the Greater Asmara area. & Hildebrand. doi:10. (1952).. Habtemichael. C. C. R. Risorese Minerarie del’Africa Orientale: Eritrea–Ethiopia–Somalia. Ullendorff. Haile. (1976). Antiquity.. R. The first millennium BC in the highlands of northern Ethiopia and south-central Eritrea: a re-assessment of cultural and political development. Schmidt. Trenton: Red Sea. Curtis. Z. C. The archaeology of ancient Eritrea (pp. The archaeology of ancient Eritrea (pp.. & Curtis. Shoshani. African Archaeological Review. C. M. 179–187). P. Phillipson. In P. Trenton: Red Sea. The archaeology of ancient Eritrea (pp. 6. J. Mehari. . Trenton: Red Sea. P. Oxford: Blackwell. Teka (Eds. Cenni sulle ona di Asmara e dintorni. The Ancient Ona communities of the first millennium BC: urban precursors and independent development on the Asmara plateau.). (eds) (2008a). J. M. Ethiopia. R. D. A. & Teka. 47–54.1007/s10437-009-9064-2. In P. Tringali. (1998). Schmidt. G. C. 189–205). M. Rome: Jandi Sapi Editori. The archaeology of ancient Eritrea. 26. Phillipson. M. (1967). R. In P. In P. (2002). (1965).Afr Archaeol Rev (2009) 26:305–325 325 Marshall.. M. (2008c). Schmidt. Curtis & Z. (2008b). Interpretations of faunal remains from archaeological sites on the Asmara plateau of Eritrea.. The archaeology of ancient Eritrea (pp. Trenton: Red Sea. Documents pour servir à l’histoire des civilisations éthiopiennes. Ancient gold mining north of Asmara: a focus on Hara Hot. & Teka. (2001). The archaeology of ancient Eritrea (pp. Schmidt. Ghebregiorgis.. & Shoshani. M. 109–177). R. Teka. Ethiopia and the Bible. In P. 7. 26. G. Necropoli di Curbacaiehat (Asmara). Usoni. 75. W. Urban precursors in the Horn: early first millennium BC communities in Eritrea.).. Teka (Eds.). Schmidt. 99–143. (2008d). C. R. Trenton: Red Sea. Z. R. (2000). Trenton: Red Sea. Teka (Eds. & Schmidt. Schmidt. Schmidt. Schmidt. (1968). R. 5(1). (2008). Curtis & Z. 849–859. Schmidt. Curtis & Z.. Teka (Eds. Curtis & Z. J. (2009). Journal of Ethiopian Studies. Trenton: Red Sea. D. R.). (1978). Schmidt. (2008). Z. P. C. 217–233). P. Teka (Eds. In P. P. Eritrea. 1993–97.
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.