1
cameras. The digital images of these drawings are then interested in the final objects of art; instead we wanted to
uploaded to the R2001 web server, where they can be examine the underlying processes and relationships, to
accessed by R2001 artists around the world. The artists experiment with the process of engagement and involvement
download a random image, change it in any way they wish, of the viewer using traditional media like drawings and
and upload it again to the R2001 web server. The original digital manipulation of drawings. Through the Internet it was
drawings and transformed images are displayed randomly in possible to have artists from different points of the globe
an 8 x 6 grid, which is both projected on a wall at the show interacting with the artists and audience in the place of the
and accessible via the R2001 web site. Visitors can watch the biennale exactly in the same time. The performance involved
permutations of their drawings, creating a dialogue between reciprocity and collaboration between the creators, the
diverse cultures and traditions. project and the audience; the art object was like a quilt in
progress; the images created by each one of us, represented
For the XII International Art Biennial of Vila Nova De fragmented info-narratives to be transformed by the
Cerveira we slightly transformed the UTUTU/eARTh collective creativity of individuals, in constant flux and
workshops because at the time the world was witnessing reorganisation in order to create ‘streams of consciousness’.
terrible and absurd political events. As artists having social
responsibilities, we wanted to reflect and to allow the
expression of our feelings about the conflicts we were living.
V. The collective body
So we chose a main idea to inspire communication between Audiences traditionally tend to be spectators. The big
artists and audience; the idea was to express our views on challenge in our project was to turn around the traditional
conflicts of every kind: roles of viewer and creator, because without the
collaboration of the public the performance could not be
‘Let our works outnumber the bombs, missiles, and bullets to possible. Furthermore we had another problem because we
be released during the war in front of us. eARTh is for were working physically with people from Portugal with
everyone. The eARTh workshop is not ONLY to collect their own culture and virtually with artists from different
individual responses. It is like keeping individual rhythm but cultures. It was important to create a sensitive ‘place’ within
also to keep a translocal harmony. Thoughts of globalization this multi-cultural reality, getting people to interact, connect
and the translocal: both are important for us to over come the and transform visual information. The people who came to
conflict’ the performance were curious about this interactive project,
(Seiji Ueoka, 2003.3.30). not knowing exactly what was expected from them. Entering
in the big room they could see two giant screens; one of them
showing art works from R2001 members (Ututu), another
‘In every community, in every country, wherever people one showing a map of the earth (eARTh), and a white wall
build unnatural boundaries between themselves, there is paper in the background with another map of the earth. In the
conflict. Moreover, confronting conflict through art has long center of the room, the visitor sees a red cloth with the
been a means of healing and a way of empowering people to objects carefully displayed for the Japanese tea ceremony,
resolve seemingly impossible conflicts’ and among them some Japanese artists dressed in beautiful
(Sharif Ezzat, 2003.2.17). kimonos.
2
Ueoka, they joined the team drawing in the white wallpaper, personal thinking and expression of thoughts emerged and
feeling they were part of something where their personal took form in virtual imagery, globally available and capable
emotions and voices played an important role to achieve a of being transformed by others during further Ututu/eARTh
collective message characterised by fragmentation and performances. The eARTh images are not intended to present
multiplicity. answers; rather they intend to raise questions about our place
in the planet, allowing multiplicity of voices and cultures.
VI. The collective message
The collective drawing was in progress; everyone was
References
visibly enjoying the act of drawing. Nana and Yoko were [1] http://www.bienaldecerveira.org/
busy helping people to use Japanese brushes and black ink. [2] www.r2001.com/
Every so often, the drawing was digitally photographed and [3] Ascott, R. (1999), (Ed.). Reframing Consciousness: Art,
sent to our web server; people could see the drawing in mind and technology. Exeter: Intellect.
progress simultaneously in the eARTh screen and on our web
page. As soon as the artists from R2001 started to transform
the images; people could follow the progress of the map and
this continued for many hours. Although the eARTh map is
not important in itself and should not be regarded as a final
outcome, the map is the virtual documentation of emotions
and feelings flowing as a narrative revealing multiple
projections of the self, the other and the collective. eARTh is
finally the free-flowing outcome of interaction between
actors within networks of transformation.
VII. Conclusion
What is then the role of the artist in an art that
increasingly sees its content and meaning as
created out of the viewer’s interactions and
negotiations? An art which is unstable, shifting and
in flux; an art which parallels life, not through
representation or narrative, but in its processes of
emergence, uncertainty and transformation; an art
which favours the ontology of becoming, rather
than the assertion of being… (Ascott, 1999, p. 68)3.