Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 42(1):19-33. 2010 doi: 10.1657/1938-4246-42.1.

19 Alpine Peatlands of the Andes, Cajamarca, Peru David J. Cooper*,†, Evan C. Wolf*,‡, Christopher Colson§, Walter Vering§, Arturo Granda¶, and Michael Meyer# *Department of Forest, Rangeland and Watershed Stewardship, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80305, U.S.A
†Corresponding ‡Present §Tetra


address: Department of Environmental Science, University of California, Davis, California 95616, U.S.A de la Facultad de Ciencias (MOL), Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina, Apdo. 456, Lima, Peru

Tech Inc., Boise, Idaho 83706, U.S.A Yanacocha S.R.L., Cajamarca, Peru

¶Herbario #Minera

Abstract An ecological analysis of wetlands in the high mountain jalca above 3700 m elevation in the Andes near Cajamarca, Peru, indicated that most wetlands are groundwater-supported peat-accumulating fens. The floristic composition of fen communities was controlled largely by groundwater chemistry, which was highly variable and influenced by watershed bedrock composition. Watersheds with highly mineralized rock discharged water as acidic as pH 3.7, which was high in CaSO 4, while watersheds with limestone, marble, and skarn produced groundwater as basic as pH 8.2 and high in CaHCO3. Of the 125 plots sampled in 36 wetland complexes, >50% of plots had at least 3 m of peat, and 21 plots had peat thicker than 7 m. Most soil horizons analyzed had 18 to 35% organic carbon, indicating high C storage. A total of 102 vascular plants, 69 bryophytes, and 10 lichens were identified. Study plots were classified using TWINSPAN into 20 plant communities, which were grouped into four broad categories by dominant life form: (1) cushion plant communities, (2) sedge- and rush-dominated communities, (3) bryophyte and lichen communities, and (4) tussock grass communities. Direct gradient analysis using canonical correspondence analysis indicated that Axis 1 was largely a water chemistry gradient, while Axis 2 was a complex hydrology and peat thickness gradient. Bryophytes and lichens were more strongly separated in the ordination space than vascular plants and were better indicators of specific environmental characteristics. Accepted: August 2009 References Cited Angiosperm Phylogeny Group 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Botanical Journal Linnaean Society 141:399–436. CrossRef APHA [American Public Health Association] 2005. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 21st edition. Washington, D.C American Public Health Association. Bosman, A. F., P. C. Van Der Molen, R. Young, and A. M. Cleef. 1993. Ecology of a páramo cushion mire. Journal of Vegetation Science 4:633–640. CrossRef Chimner, R. A. and R. Karberg. 2008. Long-term carbon accumulation in two tropical mountain peatlands, Andes Mountains, Ecuador. Mires and Peat 3:article 4, 10. Chimner, R. A., D. J. Cooper, and W. J. Parton. 2002. Modeling carbon accumulation in Rocky Mountain fens. Wetlands 22:100–110. BioOne, CSA Cleef, A. M. 1981. The vegetation of the páramos of the Colombian Cordillera Oriental. Dissertation Botanica 61:1–320. Cooper, D. J. and R. Andrus. 1994. Patterns of vegetation and water chemistry in peatlands of the west-central Wind River Range, Wyoming, USA. Canadian Journal of Botany 72:1586–1597. CrossRef, CSA Cooper, D. J., R. Andrus, and C. Arp. 2002. Sphagnum balticum in a Southern Rocky Mountains iron fen. Madroño 49:186–188. Davies, R. J. 2002. Tectonic, magmatic, and metallogenic evolution of the Cajamarca mining district, northern Peru. PhD dissertation. James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia. Earle, L. R., B. G. Warner, and R. Aravena. 2003. Rapid development of an unusual peat-accumulating ecosystem in the Chilean Altiplano. Quaternary Research 59:2–11. CrossRef Gignac, L. D., D. Vitt, S. C. Zoltai, and S. E. Bayley. 1991. Bryophyte response surfaces along climatic, chemical, and physical gradients in peatlands of western Canada. Nova Hedwigia 53:27–71.

Arctic. J. Version 9. F. CSA Squeo. and A. A. and J. MS thesis. J. U. and S. Coupling of soils and vegetation in peatland succession.. 281–310. W. 1–14. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 79:245–255. G. A. O. BioOne Klinger. Y. B. M. J. 2000. M.. Importance of water quality on plant abundance and diversity in high-alpine meadows of the Yerba Loca Natural Sanctuary at the Andes of north-central Chile. CSA . J. Suárez. Tropical alpine plant ecology. L. Amsterdam/Oxford Elsevier. 2006. J. Vegetational gradients in relation to environmental-conditions in northwestern European mires. de la Fuente. Acta Phytogeographica Suecica 49:1–144. CrossRef Stevens. O. Montenegro. 2001. A. 2001 and onwards: Angiosperm Phylogeny Website. London Academic Press. Nicholson.>. Blair. The Biology of Peatlands. and S. South Patagonian bog vegetation reflects biogeochemical gradients at the landscape level. USA: regional and local controls over plant species distribution. L. L. Townsend. 2007. N. Composition and origins of the world's tropic-alpine floras. Espinoza. P. 1008. L. Martínez Cortizas. M. Beisner. Increasing shallow groundwater CO2 and limestone weathering. and M. Bayley. P. 1988. New York John Wiley & Sons. Urrestarazu. 343. CrossRef. USA.. Luteyn. and G. 145–172. New York Columbia University Press. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 72:5581–5599. M. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data. 2006. H.. Kleinebecker. N. 547. and D. England Oxford University Press. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 81:469–488. Holzel. On the relation between vegetation and electrolytes in north Swedish mire waters. Churchill. J. L. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18:137–158.mobot. Páramo: an Andean Ecosystem under Human Influence. L. CrossRef Hedberg. CrossRef Macpherson. Casale. CrossRef Smith. 1992. and F. L. Oikos 33:297–307. and G. Canadian Journal of Botany 64:375–383. CrossRef. Hedberg. and T. B. In Lentz. and K. Ellenberg. C. Peatland distribution along a north-south transect in the Mackenzie River Basin in relation to climatic and environmental gradients. Oxford. E.. E. and A. Aravena. 15–29. Konza Prairie. In Balslev. L. B. V. 2008. Gignac. H. Bofedales: high altitude peatlands of the central Andes. Oregon MjM Software Design. T. 1996. Jeglum. CrossRef McCune. Arctic and Alpine Research 28:380–387. 2006. CrossRef. and Alpine Research 33:158–164. Features of Afroalpine plant ecology. CrossRef. and J. Páramo. P..K Cambridge University Press. 2008. Cambridge. Mefford. B. Roberts. Vogel. H. 1986. Anic. G. Antarctic. Rieley. Rydin. Tropical-alpine life-forms of vascular plants. and H. and W. Lowland tropical peatlands of Southeast Asia. Smith. Young. London Academic Press. and R. D. and J. 1992. Fort Collins. Afroalpine vegetation compared to páramo: convergent adaptations and divergent differentiation. In Martini. Stanford. Luteyn. Vegetation of the tropical Andes. H. Páramos: why study them? In Balslev. J. J. Warner. Colorado State University. An Imperfect Balance: Landscape Transformations in the Precolumbian Americas. F. 134. 1964. PC-ORD.. F. CrossRef Hedberg. de la Harpe. M. 1979. Tropical Alpine Environments: Plant Form and Function. Malmer. A. Oikos 2:241–258. R. An Andean Ecosystem under Human Influence. Bustamante. E. Gleneden Beach. 1996.Ginocchio. D. Rundel. Luteyn. Hepp. L. D. 237. CrossRef Smith. Journal of Biogeography 15:631–645. Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. P. P. Hultén. Cleef. Vegetation structure and soil properties in Ecuadorian páramo grasslands with different histories of burning and grazing. P. Mueller-Dombois. A. 1994. Flora of Alaska and Neighboring Territories. R. O. Fowle. Wűst. Silva. CSA Lemly. E. A. 1968. June 2008 <http://www. Meinzer. 2008. 375. I. S. 1975.. P. Peatlands: Evolution and Records of Environmental and Climate Changes. Chesworth. J. Version 4. 1999. Fens of Yellowstone National Park. Luteyn. J. CSA Page. P. A. Journal of Vegetation Science 19:151–160. R. Vegetatio 126:119–133. O. California Stanford University Press. J. 1950. Sjörs. Medina. 1994.

J. Northern peatlands: their characteristics. A. D. J. Mean is the mean canopy cover in all plots. Ithaca. D. R. 2004. S. Cambridge. Knapp. and W. Wilcox. and V. CrossRef Vitt. Peru and Ecuador. Ulloa. 1988. D. 871. P. R. Plant evolution and endemism in Andean South America: an introduction. 2006. 672. D. Distribution is the known geographic distribution of the taxon. Canada. Additional observations on the biogeography of the Amotape-Huancabamba zone in northern Peru: defining the southeastern limits. Soil Taxonomy. G. S. ter Braak. N is the number of stands in which the taxon was recorded. Weigend. and T. Leteyn. Martínez Cortizas.2.. and SD is the standard deviation of mean canopy cover. 465–469. Reynel. C. and W. M.. N is the number of stands in which the taxon was recorded. Ward. K. 1986. Advances in Ecological Research 18:271–317. England IUCN Publications Unit. H. Wanty. B. A theory of gradient analysis. M. H. K. B. In Martini. CrossRef. 5th edition. CSA Walter. Darwinia 41:193–206. BioOne Weigend. P. Department Of Agriculture] 1999. J. Number 436. Appendix A Vascular plant taxa found in study plots. C. I. Hydrogeochemical controls on surface and groundwater chemistry in naturally acidic. C. Prentice. Young. In Troll. D. 2002. Heywood. 1991. USDA [U. Vol. P. L. Vegetation of the Earth. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. C. Wood. F. J. F. Peatlands: Evolution and Records of Environmental and Climate Changes. Amsterdam/Oxford Elsevier. Chesworth. Chee. and E. C. The relationships of vegetation to surface-water chemistry and peat chemistry in fens of Alberta. K. U. and J. microglochin. C. Vegetatio 89:87–106. Revista Peruana de Biologia 11:127–134. Stolbovoy. J. and S. 1992. Hamilton. CANOCO—A Fortran program for canonical community ordination. 1997. Centres of Plant Diversity. and I.C Agriculture Handbook. L. 2006. L. 3. New York Microcomputer Power.. D. CSA ter Braak. Wardle. Version 3. . H. Tromble. J. and Ecological Systems of the Geo-biosphere. phytogeographical and agrarian ecology. A. Ecology 67:1167–1179. 2002. BioOne Young. Huancabamba Region. porphyry-related mineralized areas. Plumice. M. ter Braak.. Wheeler.. 2003. V. The cordilleras of the tropical Americas: aspects of climatic. Chinese Journal of Geochemistry 25:231. P. and SD is the standard deviation of the mean of percent canopy cover. G. and A. Botanical Review 68:4–21. and C. Southern Rocky Mountains. 9:15–56. Botanical Review 68:38–54. mean is the mean percent canopy cover for study stands. R. 318. T. Grassland communities and soils on a high elevation grassland of central Peru. Observations on the biogeography of the Amotape-Huancabamba zone in northern Peru. Bonn Colloquium Geographica. CrossRef Troll. camptoglochin and C. Phytologia 61:231–250. 1990. a Guide and Strategy for Their Conservation. Washington. J. Verplank. Bove. CrossRef. C. The Americas. R. Vegetation of New Zealand. Second edition. Appendix B Bryophyte taxa identified in the study plots. S. 1985. Geoecology of the Mountainous Regions of the Tropical Americas. 1986. Guaglianone. In Davis.Tarnocai. Cambridge. C. F. 17– 51. C. Notes on South American Carex (Cyperaceae): C. development and sensitivity to climate change. England Cambridge University Press. Nordstrom. 1968. Caine. New York Springer-Verlag.S.

763-771 Online publication date: 1-Aug-2010. mean is the mean percent canopy cover for study stands. N is the number of stands in which the taxon was recorded. (2010) Mountain Fen Distribution. Chimner.Appendix C Lichen taxa in study plots. Colorado. Cited by Rod A. CrossRef . San Juan Mountains. Types and Restoration Priorities. USA. Joanna M. David J. Lemly. and SD is the standard deviation of the mean of percent canopy cover. Cooper. Wetlands 30:4.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful