Soc Indic Res DOI 10.


Flourishing across Europe: application of a new conceptual framework for defining well-being
Felicia A. Huppert • Timothy T. C. So
Accepted: 20 November 2011 ©The Author(s) 2011. This article is published with open access at

Abstract Governments around the world are recognising the importance of measuring subjective well-being as an indicator of progress. But how should well-being be measured? A conceptual framework is offered which equates high well-being with positive mental health. Well-being is seen as lying at the opposite end of a spectrum to the common mental disorders (depression, anxiety). By examining internationally agreed criteria for depression and anxiety (DSM and ICD classifications), and defining the opposite of each symptom, we identify ten features of positive well-being. These combine feeling and functioning, i.e. hedonic and eudaimonic aspects of wellbeing: competence, emotional stability, engagement, meaning, optimism, positive emotion, positive relationships, resilience, self esteem, and vitality. An operational definition of flourishing is developed, based on psychometric analysis of indicators of these ten features, using data from a representative sample of 43,000 Europeans. Application of this definition to respondents from the 23 countries which participated in the European Social Survey (Round 3) reveals a four-fold difference in flourishing rate, from 41% in Denmark to less than 10% in Slovakia, Russia and Portugal. There are also striking differences in country profiles across the 10 features. These profiles offer fresh insight into cultural differences in well-being, and indicate which features may provide the most promising targets for policies to improve well-being. Comparison with a life satisfaction measure shows that valuable information would be lost if well-being was measured by life satisfaction. Taken together, our findings reinforce the need to measure subjective well-being as a multi-dimensional construct in future surveys. Keywords Well-being · Flourishing · Population sample · Europe · Measurement · Survey ________________________ F. A. Huppert (&) T. T. C. So Well-Being Institute & Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Box 189, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK e-mail: Published online 15 December 2011

1. Introduction Flourishing refers to the experience of life going well. It is a combination of feeling good and functioning effectively. Flourishing is synonymous with a high level of mental well-being, and it epitomises mental health (Huppert, 2009a,b; Keyes, 2002; Ryff & Singer, 1998). For too long the focus of mental health research and practice has been on the treatment of pathologies such as depression and anxiety, and to some extent on their prevention. It was tacitly assumed that well-being would prevail when pathology was absent. But a growing body of evidence shows that high levels of well-being are good for individuals and for society. In crosssectional, longitudinal and experimental studies, high levels of well-being have been shown to be associated with a range of positive outcomes, including effective learning, productivity and creativity, good relationships, pro-social behaviour, and good health and life expectancy (see reviews by Chida & Steptoe, 2008; Diener, Helliwell & Kahneman, 2010; Dolan, Peasgood & White, 2008; Huppert, 2009b; Lyubomirsky, Sheldon and Schkade, 2005). In order to understand the characteristics and causes of flourishing, we need to study flourishing in its own right, and not as the mere absence of mental disorder. To do so, we need to identify and characterise the people in the population who are flourishing, and the groups or nations in which there are high levels of flourishing. This will provide an essential foundation for those engaged in health promotion and policy making to increase the numbers of people who are flourishing. The dedicated study of flourishing requires an accepted definition and good quality scales by which to measure it. Although various definitions and scales exist, deriving from a variety of theoretical and empirical perspectives (see below), there is no current agreement on which should be used in research, or to inform policy. In the same way that it has taken many years for clinicians to agree on the diagnosis of mental disorders (and this remains a dynamic process as our understanding of mental disorders increases), it will take some years to achieve agreement on the definition and measurement of mental health. In this paper, after briefly reviewing the current state of the art, we outline an approach which we hope offers a useful step towards this goal. The earliest conceptual definition of mental health is usually attributed to Jahoda (1958). Based on clinical and personality theorists’ conceptions of positive functioning, she identified six key elements of positive functioning: ‘attitudes of an individual toward his own self’, ‘self actualization’, ‘integration’, ‘autonomy’, ‘perception of reality’ and ‘environmental mastery’ (1958, p.23). Influenced in part by Jahoda’s work, as well as the theoretical perspectives of other scholars from clinical and developmental psychology, Ryff (1989) proposed six dimensions of psychological well-being: autonomy, environmental mastery, personal growth, positive relationships, purpose in life and self-acceptance. A different approach was taken by Antonovsky (1993) who equated psychological well-being with a sense of coherence, which he conceived as an enduring attitude whereby life is seen as comprehensible, manageable and meaningful. For Ryan & Deci (2001), using the theoretical framework of self-determination theory, the experience of wellbeing arises from the fulfilment of what they regard as three basic psychological needs: autonomy, competence and relatedness.

and Diener. meaning. how satisfied are you with your life as a whole. positive relationships. This illustrative. Kim-Prieto. Gallup World Poll) or ‘Taking all things together. along with five dimensions of social well-being. Seligman originally proposed that the three essential elements of well-being or ‘authentic happiness’ were pleasure. Specifically. 2003). Clark & Tellegen (1988). Choi. that would be both desirable and cost-effective in large scale surveys. competence. that positive human experience can be adequately assessed using a single item about life satisfaction or happiness. Kern & Seligman. 2011). i. Helliwell. and contribution towards the well-being of others (Diener. Lucas & Smith (1999). has enriched his measurement of well-being by adding the construct of ‘flourishing’. with positive human functioning. The one thing they all have in common is the view that well-being is multi-dimensional. p. Proponents of this view have included Bradburn (1969). if well-being can be adequately assessed with a single question rather than multiple questions covering different dimensions. and will not be considered further in this paper. though far from complete. these days?’ (World Values Survey.97).e.g. engagement. There is also a school of thought which equates positive human experience with hedonic well-being alone. In his latest work. list of approaches to conceptualising well-being serves to indicate both the overlaps and the differences between existing definitions. But because they arise from the perspective of pathology and tend to focus on functional limitations. these five elements. that is. and together define wellbeing. whose components include: purpose in life. how happy would you say you are?’ (European Social Survey – Jowell & The Central Co-ordinating Team. Some other influential approaches regard well-being or positive mental health as requiring both hedonic and eudaimonic components. made in generations of economic and social surveys. . the combination of feeling good and functioning well. self-esteem. Certainly. Following Aristotle. Tov. relationships. they are of limited value in describing positive aspects of functioning. More recently. Quality of life theories and measures also focus on functional ability (see review by Taillefer et al 2003). According to Seligman. Watson. Oishi & Biswas-Diener. engagement. his notion of happiness or living life well includes both perspectives (e. he offers two further elements – relationships and accomplishment (Forgeard.The approaches described thus far are exclusively concerned with eudaimonic aspects of well-being. optimism. Keyes’ (2002) conceptualisation of well-being also combines feeling and functioning. This contrasts sharply with the long-standing assumption. are “the best approximation of what humans pursue for their own sake” (2011. Suh. Seligman. Wirtz. arguing that subjective well-being comprises an emotional component (the presence of positive emotions and the absence of negative emotions) and an evaluative component (life satisfaction). Typical questions are: ‘All things considered. engagement and meaning (2002). Their views were largely arrived at through the comprehensive factor analysis of items which measure hedonic or affective aspects of well-being. accomplishment). Diener. 2011. Although Aristotle is usually credited with advocating the eudaimonic perspective. who has been the most prolific researcher in the field of subjective well-being. Jayawickreme. Keyes’ measure combines hedonic/emotional well-being (happiness or life satisfaction) with Ryff’s six eudaimonic dimensions of psychological well-being. 2003). 2010). with the acronym PERMA (positive emotion.

Keyes states that “It is noteworthy that subjective well-being research unintentionally yielded clusters of mental health symptoms that mirror the clusters of symptoms used in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Ryff. The benefit of this approach is that the features of well-being can be deduced directly from the symptoms of disorder. 1999. Lucas & Schimmack. Rather. “…current measurement of well-being is haphazard. namely depression and anxiety. In the case of some disorders.10 (purpose in life) to . mental health consists of symptoms of hedonia such as emotional vitality and positive feelings towards one’s life. it would be instructive to intentionally examine what the characteristics of mental health would look like if we literally took the mirror opposite of the symptoms of the common mental disorders. Ryan. it appears that the measurement of well-being may not be reducible to a simple. Ryff & Keyes. and to identify the opposite of each symptom. and typically found only small or moderate correlations (e. our second aim was to carry out a similar exercise in relation to flourishing.. suggests that it may be illuminating to see how far one can take this notion. 2001.42 (selfacceptance). p. 1989. the next step is to derive an operational definition of flourishing by considering how these features can be combined. Little. and therefore that a more systematic approach is needed. 2009. with different studies assessing different concepts in different ways. mental health consists of symptoms of positive functioning” (Keyes. Sheldon.” (Diener & Seligman 2004. Timoshina & Deci. 1994). Ryff. Measures of life satisfaction may be useful in their own right as an overall evaluation. Chirkov. Once the list of positive features has been deduced. Taking this approach would serve an additional purpose. The idea that the characteristics of mental health may be the mirror opposite of the characteristics of a common mental disorder such as depression. which ranged from .A number of investigators have compared multi-dimensional measures against standard life satisfaction questions. but at this early stage in our understanding of flourishing.…In the same way that depression requires symptoms of an-hedonia. the first aim of this study was to undertake a systematic examination of the symptoms of depression and anxiety as specified by internationally agreed diagnostic criteria. Essex & Schmutte. 2007. . Accordingly. a specified number of symptoms is required to be present. unidimensional notion such as life satisfaction without losing a great deal of potentially valuable information. When symptoms are combined into diagnostic criteria such as major depression. this does not require that every symptom of depression be present in every individual. Diener. Ryff and Keyes (1995) found correlations between life satisfaction and Ryff’s six dimensions of psychological well-being. Chirkov & Ryan. For example.2). Thus. Diener & Seligman state. Lee. For example. p. In their seminal 2004 paper “Beyond money: toward an economy of well-being”. In the same way that major depression consists of symptoms of mal-functioning. 1995. ‘excessive worry’ is necessary for a diagnosis of generalised anxiety disorder. in as objective a manner as possible. while there is clearly a positive relationship between various well-being concepts and a measure of life satisfaction. In his 2007 review of multi-dimensional concepts of mental health. Thus.98). there is a case for retaining a multi-dimensional approach to the concept of well-being. Specifically. certain symptoms are deemed to be necessary for the person to meet the diagnostic criteria.g. Heliwell.

2009). but it is difficult to see what the positive pole of a distribution of phobia could be. Brugha. McManus. For instance. The second reason is that the other categories of anxiety disorder (phobias. depression and anxiety. the individual features of flourishing. There are two reasons for focusing on these categories. for depression and generalised anxiety. and the factorial structure. and identifying their underlying factor structure. Likewise. Methods and Measures 2. one can go beyond the neutral point where the symptoms are absent. In contrast. Bebbington. diagnostic criteria were based more on the personal opinions of members of the DSM task force than on scientific evidence. we sought data from a large. and (ii) what can we learn about the value of a multi-dimensional approach to flourishing by examining profiles of features in different regions and nations? Prior to addressing these questions we undertook further psychometric analysis to check if our measurement framework (e.g. one either has a phobia (of different levels of severity) or not. The same applies to OCD and PTSD. These are the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) of the American Psychiatric Association (1994). Our third principal aim was to provide an illustrative example of the potential usefulness of our conceptual and measurement frameworks. To do so. & Jenkins. intercepts) was applicable across the European regions. loadings. Meltzer. PTSD) do not have a polar opposite. and how they cluster together. to a positive pole. This step required finding existing measures of these features. The research questions we asked were: (i) how much do regions and nations differ in their overall prevalence of flourishing. which represents such features as happiness and .1 Identifying the mirror opposite of the symptoms of the common mental disorders The first step was to list the symptoms and criteria used for the most common mental disorders. undertaking psychometric analysis to establish the relationships between them. DSM-IV improved on this situation through the use of systematic evidence to support their decisions (Widiger & Clark. in order to decide how to combine features for the definition of flourishing. factor structure. before the advent of DSM-IV. The specific diagnostic categories we examined were Major Depressive Episode (DSM-IV) and Depressive Episode (ICD-10).Knowing how to combine features or symptoms in a meaningful and valid way is a step which cannot be taken through deduction. OCD. having the highest prevalence in the population (eg. generalised anxiety disorder. using our operational definition?. First. but requires a body of relevant data. and the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) of the World Health Organisation (1993). 2000). representative population sample to establish how the features are distributed in the population. in two widely used international classifications of diseases. A subsidiary aim was to examine what was gained by this approach compared to using a simple measure of life satisfaction. For example. and mixed depression and anxiety are by far the most common of the mental disorders. and Generalised Anxiety Disorder (terminology common to both systems). depression. 2. we applied the operational definition of flourishing to a multi-national European data set which included relevant indicator items. This involved investigating the relationship between a standard life satisfaction measure.

specific job-related well-being. since it contains items corresponding to each of the ten features.Global Assessment of Functioning. In order to identify the mirror opposite of the symptoms of generalised anxiety and depression. engagement. optimism. in alphabetical order: competence. positive emotion. We then assigned a single word or pair of words which in our judgement best summarised each positive concept. This requires a categorical approach. Marks. They are. it is not clear what the positive pole of these physical symptoms would be. Somatic symptoms. In Round 3 which took place in 2006/7.000 people aged 15 and above. And because depression and anxiety so commonly co-exist. since it is rare for studies of large. To do so. we included DSM-IV Axis V . In addition. we needed to find evidence of how these features are distributed in the general population. Clark. and which the ICD-10 classification includes within their diagnostic criteria. Almost half of the 54 items were concerned with aspects of social or community well-being. . sleep problems or psychomotor agitation. but what emerged is that the following ten features appeared to account for the opposite of the range of symptoms of generalised anxiety and depression listed in these two diagnostic systems. on which the current analysis is based. were not included. and was administered to representative population samples in 23 countries – a total of 43. which rates the individual’s general level of personal and social functioning. positive relationships.2. 2. 2003) was selected. to combining them in an evidence-based manner to create a diagnosis. Siegrist. meaning. This module on personal and social well-being was very wide-ranging. We undertook a parallel exercise in relation to categorising mental health and its component features. and vitality. both to deciding whether a particular symptom is present or absent. mainly because our focus was on mental states rather than physical states. we have chosen to combine the symptoms of these two disorders to represent one end of the mental health spectrum. Some opposites were easier to identify with confidence than others. it contained a supplementary well-being module (Huppert. and the way in which they tend to cluster together. representative population samples to include measures of the full range of features we identified in the previous stage of this investigation. Also. Jowell & The Central Co-ordinating Team.2 Deriving an operational definition of flourishing The DSM and ICD classification systems go beyond listing symptoms. 2. Stutzer. Finding a suitable data set was not straightforward.1 Utilising existing measures as indicators of the features of flourishing The European Social Survey (ESS. The ESS uses random sampling methods and is conducted every two years. such as significant weight loss. and then to deciding on the number of symptoms which must be present in order to reach a diagnosis.hopefulness (depression) or calmness and resilience (generalised anxiety). resilience. VittersØ & Wahrendorf 2009). The results are presented in Appendix A. a panel of four individuals (three psychologists and one lay person) began by expressing in simple English the words or phrases which best seemed to capture the positive pole of each symptom. emotional stability. self-esteem.

resilience). For the items about emotional stability and vitality. For engagement. Only 19 items were related to the ten features of flourishing identified above. meaning. so in these two cases. and emotional stability and vitality which were rated on a 4-point scale from ‘none or almost none of the time’ to ‘all or almost all of the time’. were: (a) using a general rather than a specific (pastweek) time frame where possible. The exceptions were positive emotion which was rated on a scale from 0-10 (‘extremely unhappy’ to ‘extremely happy’). and (c) using broader rather than very specific items where possible. optimism. respondents were required to indicate that they agreed. we chose ‘In general I feel very positive about myself’ rather than the negative ‘At times I feel as if I am a failure’. 2000) and aspects of personal functioning not relevant here (e. how happy would you say you are?’ rather than the past-week items from the well-being module (‘I was happy’ and ‘I enjoyed life’). Table 1 lists the ESS items which we judged as corresponding most closely to each of the ten features of flourishing.2%). or aspects of lifestyle (e.g. negative emotions (including the short Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale – CES-D. The remaining personal wellbeing items were concerned with life satisfaction. we chose ‘I love learning new things’ rather than the past-week items ‘I felt absorbed’ and ‘I felt bored’. our selection criteria. participants were categorised as demonstrating these characteristics if they responded ‘all or almost all of the time’ or ‘most of the time’. in addition to face validity. For positive relationships we chose ‘There are people who really care about me’ rather than the more specific ‘The time I spend with my family is enjoyable/stressful’. perceived opportunities. From a psychometric perspective it would have been preferable to have several good items per construct. Categorising a feature as present or absent required choosing an appropriate cut point. Radloff. on two of the items. Five features of flourishing were represented by only a single item (competence. altruism. (b) using positively worded rather than negatively worded items where possible. in favour of other post-week items . autonomy). positive relationships 90. physical activity).income comparison.‘I felt tired’. and this was largely determined by the type of response scale used. 1977. ‘I could not get going’ or ‘I felt rested’. the chosen cut points corresponded to the category above the mean. In the case of vitality. but such data were not available. However. since most personal well-being items in the ESS use a general time frame. emotional stability. The positive emotion item also showed a very strong positive skew (median was between 7 and 8 on the 0–10 scale) so we chose 8-10 as our positive category. the responses were so skewed that the vast majority of participants said they agreed (engagement 80. We also calculated mean scores and found that for each item. since there were no questions about general vitality. Most items were rated on a 5-point scale from ‘strongly agree’ to ‘strongly disagree’.g.5%. For self-esteem. Where a choice of items was available. In the case of the seven items using the agree/disagree format. we chose the past-week question ‘I had a lot of energy’. Note that for the positive emotion item we used a standard question about happiness which is part of the core ESS: ‘Taking all things together. Steffick. we used the ‘strongly agree’ category. . so for the remaining five we decided to choose the item which seemed to best capture the construct.

Table 1.49 (self-esteem and optimism).2 Combining existing measures into an operational definition of flourishing The next step was deciding how to combine these features in order to establish an overall category corresponding to mental health or flourishing. (In the past week) I had a lot of energy. Hungary was excluded from the analysis since data for the vitality item was missing among all respondents in Hungary1. The countries taking part in the ESS were divided into three geographical regions. Data were weighted using standard ESS techniques to ensure that: (a) the sample in each country was representative of its population. Taking all things together. Countries within each region share broad similarities in terms of their culture and governance. Spain. Belgium. I generally feel that what I do in my life is valuable and worthwhile. Iceland. (In the past week) I felt calm and peaceful. Poland. I love learning new things. I am always optimistic about my future. . Estonia. Italy. Greece. We began by calculating the inter-item Spearman correlations. When things go wrong in my life it generally takes me a long time to get back to normal. Finland. 1997). Luxembourg. Netherlands. Self-esteem Vitality 2.2. Norway. Ireland. Romania and Turkey. Slovakia. Van der Vijver & Leung. Slovenia. I feel very positive about myself. All correlations are statistically significant 1 Some countries which have taken part in other round of the ESS did not take part in Round 3 because they were unable to secure funding in time of the start of field work. Ukraine). Portugal. and (b) each country was represented in proportion to its population size. Sweden). Southern/Western Europe (Austria. Israel. United Kingdom). and Eastern Europe (Bulgaria.10 (engagement and emotional stability) to . which are presented in Table 2. and range from . Czech Republic. It can be seen that all items are positively correlated. The three regions were: Northern Europe (Denmark. Russian Federation. Lithuania. Switzerland. 2011. These were Croatia. (Reverse score) In general. Germany. how happy would you say you are? There are people in my life who really care about me. Cyprus. Features of flourishing and indicator items from the European Social Survey Positive feature Competence Emotional stability Engagement Meaning Optimism Positive emotion Positive relationships Resilience ESS item used as indicator Most days I feel a sense of accomplishment from what I do. France. Scores on each item were standardised within each region to reduce or eliminate unwanted cross-regional differences such as response set (Matsumoto & Van der Vijver. Latvia.

two tailed). reflecting the very large sample size. To establish how many dimensions of well-being were incorporated in these data we undertook an Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) with oblique rotation. with each item loading at least 0.5 on the corresponding factor (Table 3).(p<. vitality. positive emotion.001. optimism. . The first factor comprises emotional stability. The EFA revealed a clear two-factor structure explaining 43% of the variance. and positive relationships. meaning. and self-esteem. and is identified as ‘positive functioning’. resilience. and is identified as ‘positive characteristics’. competence. The second factor comprises engagement.

27 .26 .18 .20 .22 .13 .14 . Spearman correlations among different well-being indicators Emotional Competence stability Engagement Meaning .19 .22 .21 .22 .28 .14 .24 .10 .37 .24 .26 .27 .01 level .12 .14 .17 .31 .25 .24 .23 .13 .27 .31 .24 .Table 2.11 .21 .28 .22 .23 .19 .37 .49 .17 .19 .20 Positive emotion Positive relationship Resilience Self-esteem Vitality Optimism Competence Emotional Stability Engagement Meaning Optimism Positive emotion Positive relationship Resilience Self-esteem Vitality .25 .25 - Note: All correlations are significant at the .24 .29 .

68 . life satisfaction and happiness are measuring a very similar construct.64 .24 .15 .19 .8%) Emotional stability Vitality Resilience Optimism Happiness Self-esteem Engagement Meaning Positive relationships Competence a a . which correlated .68 .1%)a -. The model explained 52. This analysis indicates that with respect to the present measures.13 -.20 % of variance explained To address the question of how much this multi-dimensional approach might tell us about flourishing compared to a single item about life satisfaction.06 .68 with life satisfaction. whereas all other items are measuring eudaimonic aspects of well-being. When we added the life satisfaction item to the EFA.28 . The only one of the ten flourishing features which had a significant loading on this factor was positive emotion (Table 4). but nine of the ten flourishing items had a low correlation with the satisfaction item. The striking exception was positive emotion.Table 3.57 . this created a distinct third factor.59 1 (31.77 .59 .56 . all the correlations were significant because of the large sample size (p<.11 (engagement) to .09 . which we termed ‘positive appraisal’. ranging from . which we can equate with hedonic well-being. All correlations were positive. This was considerably higher than any of the correlations between the ten features of flourishing.56 .50 -. Again.29 (optimism). but this time included the standard life satisfaction item from the core ESS – ‘How satisfied are you with your life as a whole nowadays?’ (rated on a 0-10 scale). two tailed).01 -.01. we repeated the two previous steps.06 .0% of total variance. 11 . Exploratory Factory Analysis of ESS indicator items Factor 2 (11.

9%)a -.09 -.44 . and adopted as our operational definition of flourishing.40 .03 .33 .02 .64 .36 .12 .70 .04 .69 . we were guided by the approach used for mental disorders.14 -.36 . Following this approach.51 .86 .09 -. 12 . together with positive emotion.01 3 (9.16 2 (10. Diagnostic criteria for depression and anxiety do not require that all symptoms be present.23 -.20 . This was met by 15.54 -. In order to establish how many of the features of positive characteristics and positive functioning should be present. Exploratory Factory Analysis of ESS indicator items plus life satisfaction. a % of variance explained Factor 1 (31.8% of the total European sample. such as ‘excessive worry’ for the diagnosis of generalised anxiety disorder. we proposed that positive emotion be a required feature. We also proposed that the majority of the symptoms in each of the ‘positive characteristics’ and ‘positive functioning’ factors be present.06 .09 . The criterion we selected was having all but one of the features of positive characteristics and all but one of the features of positive functioning. we set about to propose an operational definition of flourishing.Table 4.02 .3%)a .15 .28 . DSM–IV also requires that the majority of all symptoms be present.22 .08 .8%)a Emotional stability Vitality Resilience Optimism Self-esteem Engagement Meaning Competence Positive relationships Life satisfaction Positive emotion .63 . given that it is the only feature which addresses the hedonic (emotional) aspect of well-being.71 .83 Building on these findings.11 -. They do however require the presence of one or two key symptoms.

since the percentage is similar to the percentage who meet the criterion for flourishing (15. We chose the higher of these cut points to categorise high life satisfaction. p < .55. we examined the correlation between the two measures in the full European sample.7% were flourishing.96. Model fit parameters demonstrated an acceptable result for the two-factor model. In general. all factor loadings are constrained to be invariant across the groups in the model (measurement invariance . and Eastern Europe. CFI = . 1994).98.06 or below are indicative of good empirical fit (Browne & Cudeck. which involves constraining the factor variances and covariance matrix to equivalence across groups (Model 4). CFI and GFI values of .34 (p<. we needed to select an appropriate cut point on the latter measure.001. we planned to compare the prevalence of flourishing across the 22 European countries in the ESS which had full data on the ten features. This involved testing four nested models across the three regions. The final step is to investigate full score (or scalar) invariance. 38. model fit was determined using standard fit indices. however. or measurement equivalence (Cheung & Rensvold. The Spearman correlation between flourishing and life satisfaction was . and among people who had high life satisfaction.3 Calculating the prevalence of flourishing across Europe Having derived our operational definition of flourishing. the percentage who were both flourishing and had high life satisfaction was 7. a drop in CFI > .0% had high life satisfaction.3 Flourishing versus life satisfaction To establish how our composite measure of flourishing is related to a standard single-item measure of life satisfaction.Model 2).02 would be regarded as a reduction in fit. 1998). Southern/Western Europe. GFI = . Since the chi-square goodness of fit test is very sensitive to sample size (Marsh.02613 . As shown in Table 5.01). The next step tests the equivalence of item intercepts across groups (Model 3).3% . and the more restricted model is not confirmed (Cheung & Rensvold. Using a score of 9-10 the corresponding figure was 18. and Root Mean Square Error of Approximations (RMSEAs). Among people who met the criterion for flourishing. To compare the percentage of individuals who were flourishing with the percentage who had high life satisfaction.2.2. Next. Using a score of 8-10 as indicative of high life satisfaction. we began with a multi-sample Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) of the three regions – Northern Europe. we found that 40% of Europeans had high life satisfaction. Byrne. the configural invariance model achieves acceptable fit for the data across the three regions (χ2 (df = 90) = 2444. Lisrel GFI Fit Index (GFI). 1999).90 or above.1%. 46. 1993. Balla & McDonald. indicating measurement equivalence across the three regions. We used Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to test for scale invariance. Since previous studies have shown regional consistency across Europe. Before doing so. The results are reported in Table 5. 2. 1999).Model 1). Responses on this measure were very skewed. For Europe as a whole. namely Comparative Fit Index (CFIs). When moving to a more stringent model. The first step investigates whether the two-factor model fits the data well in more than one sample (construct or form invariance . and RMSEA values of . we needed to check the cross-cultural comparability of the item and factor structure to ensure that comparison across Europe is valid and meaningful.027 (90% CI: .8%). RMSEA = .

and Eastern Europe.2%) and Austria (27. there was more than a four-fold difference between the highest and lowest countries.25 df 90 106 126 132 CFI . The minimal change in fit indices suggested that the two-factor model achieved measurement equivalence across Northern. The estimated prevalence of flourishing (% meeting criterion) is shown in Figure 1.026 (.18 7415.99 .6%). followed some way behind by Switzerland (30.037-.55 2845.037-.28).085) and Eastern Europe (n = 13. Southern/Western Europe (n = 22. All the Nordic countries are in the top third of the distribution.026-.0.3%). With respect to individual countries. The χ2 of subsequent constrained models also achieved acceptable fits.98 .038 (.22 7205.98 RMSEA (90% CI) .038) ∆χ2(∆df) 400. goodness of fit data showed measurement equivalence across the three regions.4%).039) .001 Model 1 Baseline model Model 2 All factor loadings being constrained Model 3 All item intercepts being constrained Model 4 All factor variances and covariances being constrained 3.078).67 (16)** 4359. Southern / Western.96 .9%). Denmark has by far the highest rate of flourishing (40.98 . and again.6%). 14 .027 (.837) for the 2-factor model Model tested Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 χ2 2444.96 .95 GFI .07 (6)** Note: **p<0. Table 5. The analysis was repeated for the three-factor model. we applied the operational definition of flourishing described above to the nations which took part in the European Social Survey (Round 3). Differences in model fit for Northern Europe (n = 7.028) .96 .96 (20)** 210. Results Having established regional equivalence. Russian Federation (9.027) . three countries have rates of less than 10%: Slovakia (9. At the other end of the scale. and Portugal (9.025-.038 (. with high consistency across regions. while all the Eastern European countries are in the bottom half. It can be seen that there is very large variation across Europe.

notably France. positive relationships. it did not score at the bottom on any of the individual features. France (self-esteem). The only exception was for vitality. by examining rankings of the percentage showing each feature. and resilience. France (engagement). although Portugal had the lowest overall level of flourishing among the 22 countries. Poland (engagement). and Slovenia (vitality). while others such as Slovakia and Portugal had consistently low rankings. showed extreme variation. Some countries. Variations in rankings could be observed in all countries. and Spain. optimism). and Slovakia (positive relationships). Other countries which obtained top rankings were: Switzerland (competence). positive emotion. Interestingly. Russia (meaning. Some countries such as Denmark had consistently high rankings. Spain (competence. Spain (self-esteem). It can be seen (top of Table 6) that a consistent pattern was observed among regions. Figure 2 depicts the profiles of four countries. Cyprus (optimism). Denmark had the highest ranking among the 22 countries on five of the ten features – emotional stability.Figure 1 Prevalence of flourishing across European countries participating in the European Social Survey 2006/7 We also examined the way regions and countries differ in terms of their profiles across the ten features. Profiles for individual countries are also shown in Table 6. positive emotion. having the highest rankings on some features and the lowest on others. where Eastern Europe had the highest ranking and Northern Europe the lowest. meaning. selected to represent the range of diversity in country profiles. resilience). with Northern Europe having the highest rankings. followed by Southern/Western and Eastern Europe. vitality). The countries with the lowest rankings were Bulgaria (emotional stability. 15 .

Ranking of each feature of flourishing across 3 regions and 22 countries Competence Emotional Engagement Meaning Optimism Positive Positive Resilience Self-esteem Vitality stability emotion relationships Northern Europe 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 Southern/Western 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Europe Eastern Europe 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 Denmark 3 1 10 1 5 1 1 1 11 6 Switzerland 1 5 11 2 2 2 12 5 3 2 Austria 4 14 3 5 4 11 4 14 12 4 Finland 12 10 4 15 10 3 8 4 10 17 Norway 6 2 7 4 8 4 11 2 20 12 Ireland 8 13 13 3 3 6 6 7 6 14 Sweden 2 4 16 12 9 5 10 3 8 19 Cyprus 13 18 8 6 1 8 7 16 4 16 Netherlands 14 6 20 10 14 6 14 8 17 2 United Kingdom 15 19 15 14 12 10 3 6 13 20 Germany 5 3 18 18 7 15 17 12 2 5 Belgium 10 12 5 7 17 9 13 9 21 15 Spain 22 15 8 17 13 12 5 11 1 22 Estonia 20 8 17 19 11 17 15 17 14 8 France 10 17 1 9 21 14 20 10 22 9 Slovenia 18 7 21 8 6 13 21 19 5 1 Poland 19 21 22 13 19 16 19 13 7 11 Ukraine 9 9 6 21 18 21 9 21 16 7 Bulgaria 16 22 2 20 16 22 2 22 15 18 Slovakia 21 11 19 16 20 18 22 18 19 13 Russian Federation 7 16 14 22 22 19 18 20 18 10 Portugal 17 20 12 11 15 19 16 15 9 21 *Regions and countries are presented in order of the overall % flourishing.Table 6. and the next rank is omitted 16 . Tied scores have the same ranking.

Figure 2 Profiles of flourishing: rankings on features of flourishing for selected European countries 17 .

positive relationship. Some conceptual approaches to well-being have focused exclusively on the hedonic aspects (e. ongoing debate about how well-being. 1958. Ryan & Deci. Joseph. This raises the question about the necessity of autonomy as an element in positive human functioning. generalised anxiety and depression. both positive feeling and positive functioning. are also represented among the ten features of flourishing.g. as described in two internationally agreed sets of diagnostic criteria (DSM-IV & ICD-10). optimism. and needs to be elucidated and investigated in its own right.g. and vitality. 1996) that a clinical diagnosis such as depression represents an arbitrary cut point along a continuum. which was assessed by the item “Most days I feel a sense of accomplishment from what I do”. We explored the idea that flourishing could be conceived as the opposite of mental disorder. meaning. emotional stability. All five constructs proposed by Seligman as the elements of well-being. 1989). (2010). Suh. Hiller. However. Fishwick. One finding that emerged from this approach is that it includes both hedonic and eudaimonic components. Platt. Parkinson. resilience. 1993. and Ryff & Keyes (1995). 2001. what the ten features do not include is psychodynamic constructs such as ‘personal growth’ or ‘self acceptance’ (Ryff. Markus. rather than its mere absence. namely PERMA (positive emotion.. Through a systematic examination of the symptoms of the common mental disorders. Secker & Stewart-Brown (2007). relations. Diener et al. Kitayama & Heiman. which is a central concept for Jahoda (1958). Outside the clinical context. engagement. Our conceptual framework is more in keeping with the approaches of Keyes (2002). Ryff (1989). Whittington & Huppert. The cut point is intended to represent the severity at which the person is no 18 . While our choice of terms contains some element of subjective judgements. 1993. 2011). it is less relevant in collectivist countries such as many in Asia and Africa (e. Jahoda. or the construct of autonomy or selfdetermination. positive emotion. It is also interesting to examine the extent of overlap between the flourishing constructs derived from our deductive approach and the variety of definitions used in the literature. Most of the constructs proposed by the other leading researchers mentioned above.4. Autonomy was not included in our list of features because its opposite is not specified in DSM or ICD diagnostic criteria for depression or anxiety. Bradburn. Weich. Discussion In this paper. Ryff. all of which incorporate both hedonic and eudaimonic aspects of well-being. 1997. & Sapyta. Diener. Seligman (2002. That is. It has been recognised for some time (e. Huppert & Rose. 2007) we have intentionally and systematically examined symptoms of the common mental disorders and proposed their mirror opposites as exemplifying the concept of mental health or flourishing. 1999. if we equate accomplishment with the feature ‘competence’. that is. self-esteem. Watson et al. loss of autonomy is not regarded as a symptom of these disorders. Anderson. We suggest that the new conceptual framework which we have developed is a useful contribution to the lively. This resulted in ten features representing positive aspects of mental functioning: competence. accomplishment) are represented.g. whose models incorporate eudaimonic constructs. 1989). 1988). Ryan & Deci (1995). while others have focused exclusively on eudaimonic aspects (e.g. 1969. engagement. we had no preconceptions about the nature and number of constructs which we would find. Rather than subjective well-being research unintentionally yielding mental health symptoms that mirror the symptoms of mental disorders (Keyes. meaning.. this was essentially a deductive exercise. 1996). mental health or flourishing should be characterised both for purposes of research and to inform policy. we identified the positive pole of each symptom dimension. Antonovsky. we have derived a conceptual definition of flourishing which builds on the recognition that flourishing is more than the absence of disorder. Tennant. some cross-cultural researchers have suggested that while autonomy may be regarded as important for well-being in Western nations. and the recent work of Diener et al.

Diener et al.longer able to function in their everyday life. 2000). in which one or more symptoms are regarded as necessary for the diagnosis. Nordic countries consistently report the highest levels of happiness or life satisfaction. 2006). A total of 43. low unemployment. Among Nordic countries. 2008. since it has considered the other common mental disorder. This document was cited by Seligman (2011) and Forgeard et al (2011). Our finding that Portugal has the lowest subjective well-being in this study may seem puzzling. Haavind & Magnusson. We have taken this categorical approach forward to develop an operational definition of flourishing and a measurement framework based on what we regard as the best available data. as well as high levels of civil rights and individualism (Diener et al. followed by factor analysis to determine how best to combine these features into an operational definition of flourishing. At the other end of the scale. 2005. 2000). 2008). 2003) which incorporated for the first time. Using complete data from 22 countries (Hungary was excluded because they failed to assess vitality). we were guided by the approach taken in establishing criteria for the common mental disorders. Deaton. Nevertheless. In an earlier briefing document which we prepared for an OECD meeting (Huppert & So. It is encouraging that the Work Group developing DSM-V (due to be published in May. 2009). The operational definition which emerged from our analysis was based on the factor structure which had revealed two principal factors labelled ‘positive characteristics’ and ‘positive functioning’. & Diener. as well as depression. such as Generalised Anxiety Disorder. Our operational definition was that in order to qualify as flourishing. and the indications are that the list of symptoms of depression and anxiety are likely to remain unchanged. 2002). 1995). although its low well-being is in line with other findings (Böhnke. 2005. 2011). 2005. 2013). 2010). Again.. Inglehart & Klingemann. generalised anxiety.000 participants took part in the third wave of the European Social Survey (ESS. a person had to show the presence of positive emotion together with all but one of the positive characteristics and all but one aspect of positive functioning. & Welzel. and ethnic homogeneity (Diener. and Portugal twenty-second. Inglehart. Hagerty. Foa. we used it to investigate differences in flourishing across regions and nations. high social trust. Diener. 2005. representative sample of individuals in 23 European countries. with high rates among Nordic countries. and among the explanations are low poverty and high welfare expenditure (Vogel. 2009). 1995. explanations include well-developed social welfare and health care systems. recommends that dimensional measures of symptoms be considered as an adjunct to clinical diagnosis (American Psychiatric Association. Aside from its relatively low GDP and the large gap between its richest and poorest 19 . This comes from a very large. little welfare provision. along with the majority of the remaining symptoms. very low rates among Eastern European countries and large variation within Southern/Western Europe. After demonstrating model equivalence. along with a stand-alone hedonic item – positive emotion. 2010. Debate is ongoing about whether the cut point for some disorders. with Switzerland being ranked second. Having derived our new operational definition on the total European sample. less democratic institutions. we used an operational definition which focused on depression as the opposite of flourishing. have high income inequality. Brainerd.. a well-being module (Huppert et al. we established appropriate cut points for the presence/absence of each feature of flourishing. diagnostic categories will remain at the core of DSM-V. In addition to their relative wealth and low income inequality. These findings are broadly in line with international surveys using standard questions about happiness or life satisfaction measured around the same time (Böhnke. more perceived corruption and poor governance (Böhnke. should be changed. countries which were formerly under a Communist regime are less wealthy. The definition used in the present paper is more comprehensive. Peterson. Jowell & The Central Co-ordinating Team. 2008. Denmark consistently ranks as the happiest nation in international surveys (Deaton. we examined the prevalence of flourishing across the three European regions and found very marked differences. Lima & Nova.

g. One possibility is that the low ranking reflects Norwegian modesty.. the overlap was modest. early retirement. and a very low level of social trust (World Values Survey. The one exception we found in our data was a high correlation (. we compared region and country profiles across the different features of flourishing by examining the variations in ranking within each geographical area. 2003). indicating that they are measuring a very similar construct.g. indicating that a global measure of life satisfaction is no substitute for the information gained from a multi-dimensional approach. yet the other Nordic countries have much higher rankings on this item (Denmark 11. 1995). Diener & Suh. Ryff & Keyes. when we included life satisfaction in a factor analysis with the ten features of flourishing.. Dolan et al. 2008. Portugal) rankings. A standard measure of life satisfaction showed low correlations with almost all our features of flourishing. Chirkov & Ryan. France is a particularly interesting case.g. 20 . 2009.citizens. 2000). 2005. since it always does relatively poorly on measures of overall subjective well-being (usually life satisfaction or happiness) despite its wealth. also show extreme variations in rankings across features. which requires further exploration. Helliwell & Putnam. we found that life satisfaction and happiness had very high loadings (>.g. A pattern of results such as these speaks volumes about the need for surveys to use multi-dimensional measures of subjective well-being. Examination of the French profile across the ten features of flourishing may shed some light on this puzzle. Our data show both extremely high and extremely low rankings. Graversen & Ropo. Similar findings have been reported in other studies (e. Andersen. flourishing and life satisfaction are overlapping but distinct concepts. 2007). 2008). France has the highest ranking of all countries on engagement. 2007). Why Norwegians appear to have such low ranking on the self-esteem item (‘In general I feel very positive about myself’ is a matter for speculation. and a great deal would be lost by measuring life satisfaction alone. while others showed very marked variability in their rankings. apart from self-esteem where they ranked 20 out of 22. and its commitment to leisure activities (Böhnke. Finland 10. Portugal has the lowest level of education among all economically developed countries (an average of 8. on which no other feature had a significant loading. Southern/Western European countries are ranked second on all ten features. we found a correlation of .5 years) (The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Smith. probably hedonic well-being. although there is frequently pressure in large scale surveys to do so. and Eastern European countries third. 2004) have noted the close similarity between measures of overall life satisfaction and happiness. 2001. rankings show remarkable consistency. Sweden 8) .83) on a ‘positive appraisal’ factor. around half of those who were flourishing had high life satisfaction. Surprising data came from Norway whose rankings were typically high or average on all features. some nations showed consistently high (Denmark) or consistently low (Slovakia. but has the lowest ranking on self-esteem. Other countries. Ekelund. At the country level. notably Bulgaria and Spain. Indeed. Dolan et al. on all but one feature – vitality. Nordic countries are ranked first. where the position is reversed. Across the three regions. When we examined the relationship between life satisfaction and flourishing.. The fact that Eastern European countries report the highest levels of vitality or energy is an entirely novel result. Clearly. short working hours. However modesty is also regarded as a characteristic of other Nordic countries (e. The need for multi-dimensional measures of well-being is further supported by our data comparing the flourishing and life satisfaction measures. Diener et al.68) between life satisfaction and happiness.34. and is in the bottom two or three on optimism and positive relationships. Other investigators (e. At the individual level. and around one third of those with high life satisfaction were flourishing. To gain a deeper understanding of the components of well-being. Both of these factors typically show strong associations with low well-being (e.

some elements of subjectivity were unavoidable. Comparing average scores would provide no indication of the number of people who have very high (or very low) levels of flourishing. For instance. The data reported in this paper are from 2006/07. and the use of structural equation modelling to establish measurement equivalents across geographic regions. and the present authors have begun a similar process for the remaining five features. It would be very interesting to know if the recession has changed the prevalence of flourishing or its component features within and between countries. and the extent to which country rankings of the prevalence of flourishing may have altered. In this study. This is because well-being science is at a relatively early stage.4. The present study examined measurement equivalence using multi-sample confirmatory factor analysis by regions. Tennant. we recommend a combination of continuous and categorical approaches so that one can measure the distribution of scores on each feature as well as variations in the overall measure of flourishing. Platt. but also made an adjustment if responses were very skewed. as we did in the present study. 2007) and the Flourishing Scale of Diener et al. we chose item cut points based chiefly on their response format. limitations and future directions The principal strengths of this study include: the relatively objective manner in which the basic features of flourishing were derived. We believe that this comprehensive investigation will help to advance our understanding of well-being. We selected items from the European Social Survey (Round 3). (2009) also use only one item per construct. representative. This serves as a starting point for similar analyses which should be conducted across the 22 individual countries in further studies to see if any differences are observed. Efforts to create multi-item. Further. two years before the severe economic recession from which many countries have since suffered. has the relative position of Ireland changed following the deep recession and severe spending cuts imposed at the end of 2010? Recent data from the Gallup 21 . Other studies which use different surveys and different items as indicators of the ten features of flourishing might reach a different conclusion about cut points and the number and combination of features required. multi-dimensional measures of the features of flourishing are currently underway for the five features corresponding to PERMA (Butler & Kern. in preparation). For future studies. It is interesting to note that two recently designed well-being scales. This would help to ensure the validity of future studies which aim to understand the factors associated with national differences in flourishing. a categorical approach is the appropriate method for establishing the prevalence of a condition – in this case the prevalence of positive well-being or flourishing. and the number of features required to meet the criterion of flourishing. multi-national sample. and we know almost nothing about the upper end of the well-being spectrum. 2009. the application of the operational definition to a very large. both conceptually and in terms of a measurement framework. Subjective judgements were involved in the selection of survey items to be used as indicators of these features. representativeness and comprehensive coverage of well-being. it was not possible to find multiple good items per feature. because of its size. Tennant et al. Tennant.. Analysing existing data. as well as the presence or absence of each feature of well-being. Parkinson & Weich.1 Strengths. we used a categorical approach to the definition of flourishing. the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (Stewart-Brown. as well as the cut-off score on each item to establish whether it is present or absent. and the operational definition was largely based on the factorial structure of the data. It would also be desirable to use several good items as indicators of each feature. While our definition of flourishing and the resulting ten features were derived in as objective a manner as possible. the use of a psychometric approach to establishing an operational definition of flourishing.

but low on others such as engagement or resilience.g. If a population group is high on some features of well-being such as positive relationships. Governments around the world are taking a keen interest in the measurement of subjective well-being. secular shifts. 2009. 2005. Using a multi-dimensional approach to the measurement of wellbeing will enable them not only to establish which specific aspects of well-being have been impacted by policy changes. and policy impacts. but the future lies in developing a deeper understanding of the multiple dimensions of well-being. And above all. 2007. Stiglitz et al. Diener et al. 2009). this deeper understanding of well-being and its determinants will allow us to develop effective approaches to the promotion of well-being and the enhancement of flourishing in the population. when the well-being module is repeated in ESS Round 6 in 2012. 22 . Gallup used a single-item measure of life satisfaction (the Cantril ladder).. but also to identify the most promising levers of change. Marks & Shah. Some economically-driven surveys might include only one or a few subjective well-being items. Dolan & White. and it would be valuable to know the way in which a multi-dimensional measure of wellbeing may have changed. with a view to measuring progress more effectively. 2010). improving their policy decisions.World Poll show almost no impact of the economics crisis on subjective well-being in the UK (Crabtree. cultural values. how they are influenced by socio-economic factors.. Longitudinal analysis of the ESS data will be informative in this regard. However. and increasing the well-being of citizens (e. it is clear where interventions should be targeted.

. Chirkov. (2007). S. 1-25). Crabtree. Retrieved January 26.. E.. E. A. M. Bollen & 4th ed. W. Social Science and Medicine 36. A. S. B. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. E. & Smith. E. Columbus (ED. A. & Cudeck. S. The structure of psychological well-being. E. Brainerd. E. Chida. Wirtz. Tov. W. Washington. R. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2010 http://www. Diener. (1969). 23. (1993). Diener. N. M. Suh. Lucas. In F. E. Parent and teacher autonomy-support in Russian and U. J.. 71-85. (1997).. Psychological Bulletin. M. ‘Do we really 23 . J... 475-485 American Psychiatric Association (l994). W. Peasgood. & White. M. (Eds) (2000). Cheung. M. & Kahneman D. ( 2004). R. (2009). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. L. Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations. Böhnke.. D. (2008). NY. T... J. L. Long (Eds. & Ryan.S. International Differences in Well-Being. B.. M.. Are Scandinavians Happier than Asians? Issues in Comparing Nations on Subjective WellBeing. G. 53-72. Newbury Park. M. P.) (2010). The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Huppert. M.aspx Deaton. E . 70. P. 25. and White. E. Chicago: Aldine.. 125. R. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. Antonovsky. November 24. & Oshi . (2005).. M. American Psychiatric Association (2011).gallup. Testing Structural Equation Models (pp. 276-302. (2008). United Nations Development Programme Human Development Research Paper 2010/16. P. Well-being for public policy. (2010). A. 725–733. & Suh. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. 143-156. Dolan... In K. V. Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being.-W. U. Cited in Diener.M.. E. (2001).. Diener.. DC: Author. & Biswas-Diener. A. (1993). Positive psychological well-being and mortality: A quantitative review of prospective observational studies. Nova Science Publishers: Hauppauge. (in preparation) The Well-Being Theory Questionnaire. Suh. Culture and subjective well-being. D. CA: Sage Publications. & Kern. New York: Oxford University Press. Helliwell. Diener. Journal of Economic Perspectives. E. & Rose. Bradburn. How can measures of Subjective Wellbeing be used to Inform Public Policy? Perspectives on Psychological Science. Happiness and Sense of Belonging. L. Byrne. & Schimmack. H. & Rensvold. 69. Oishi. F.. & Seligman. 136-162)..) Politics and Economics of Asia (pp.. (1993).. (Eds. & Sapyta. 97. & Diener. First European Quality of Life Survey: Life Satisfaction. CA: Sage. E. health and well-being around the world: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. Helliwell.dsm5. Psychosomatic Medicine. Psychological Medicine. I. Diener. Income. Lucas. 1-31.). 741–756. M. (1994). (1999). Testing factorial invariance across groups: A reconseptualization and proposed new method. Normality.. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. 32(5). Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS Windows: Basic Concepts. USA: Oxford University Press. F. References Anderson. J. E. Journal of Management. Dolan. J. (2010). Y. C. Diener. R. deviance and minor psychiatric morbidity in the community. Human development in Eastern Europe and the CIS since 1990. (2010) Britons’ wellbeing stable through economic crisis Gallup. MA: MIT.. P... 1–27. Butler. M. Diener. New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Diener. pp. 618-635. & Steptoe. DSM-IV. Choi. P. R. M. revised. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. Cambridge. 851-864. Social Indicators Research. 5.. (1995). C. adolescents: Common effects on well-being and academic motivation. and Programming. 22. 2011 from http://www. (1999). R.. P. Browne. E. 2. Kim-Prieto. (2004). D05 Mixed Anxiety/Depression. E. Diener.. Thousand Oaks. (2008).

M. Kern. Cambridge. Matsumoto. A. (1996). Jayawickreme. 435-59). F.. Subjective well-being across cultures.R. (2003). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. R.F. Huppert. (2011). Journal of Economic Psychology. & Nova. Jahoda M. J. Beijing. Foa. & So. 15. Marks. London: Centre for Comparative Social Surveys. The Science of Well-Being (London: Oxford University Press. Baylis. (2008). Putnam (2004) ‘The Social Context of Well-Being’. & Schkade.A. How’s life? Combining individual and notional variables to explain subjective wellbeing. Balla. & The Central Co-ordinating Team (2003). VittersØ.. W. R. & S. (2000). R. Markus. M. S. 1. Review of General Psychology. 29. The Nordic countries-welfare paradises for women and children? Feminism and Psychology. J. 137-164. (2009b).. Keverne (Eds).. A new approach to reducing disorder and improving well-being. & Magnusson. MA: MIT Press.. M.. Huppert. 24 . K.L. Helliwell.. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 391-410. H. The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. 2005. N. New York: Guilford Press.. and happiness. L. Current Concepts of Positive Mental Health. R. 764-771. City University.. J. (2000). (2005). Lyubomirsky. & Klingemann. 111–131. M. & Heiman. 5-33. 20. S. Portuguese Journal of Social Science. & Seligman.. Keverne and N. 78. (1958). 62. N. Suh (Eds. 857–913). J. In E. (2011). 229-237. T. 264-285. M. Hagerty. Econ Model.. Huppert. In E. Florence. Reprinted in F.. J. N. Psychological Bulletin. Psychological well-being: Evidence regarding its causes and consequences.. A. 5. C. Baylis & B. C. M. & Welzel. Huppert. In E. F. Doing the right thing: Measuring well-being for public policy. 79-106.J. C. J. R.D. freedom. (2005). (2009a). F. 2009.. Development. Marks. New York: Cambridge University Press. 91.. Marsh. D. New York: Basic Books. R. A well-being manifesto for a flourishing society. Inglehart. B. A. (1998). Huppert. Huppert.. L.E. R. 1(1). (2009) What percentage of people in Europe are flourishing and what characterises them? Briefing document for the OECD/ISQOLS meeting “Measuring subjective well-being: an opportunity for NSOs?” 23/24 July. Keyes. Keyes.). W. T. 3. Jowell. M. culture. A. Stutzer. Diener & E. Helliwell. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-being. July 2011. Kruglanski (Eds. and rising happiness: A global perspective (1981-2007). 207– 222. A. Haavind. Cross-cultural research methods in psychology. D.P. & Ven der Vijver. 43. So far so good: Subjective and social wellbeing in Portugal and Europe. (2006). H.F. Wang (2011) ‘Weekends and well-being’ Draft paper for the 16th World Congress of the International Economic Association. Italy. F. Siegrist. M. Inglehart. A. van de (Eds. In F.331-360 Helliwell. (2005). Goodness-of-fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. The science of well-being. Kitayama. eds. R. Clark. Promoting and protecting mental health as flourishing: A complementary strategy for improving national mental health.. & Wahrendorf. 301-315. M. 94-122. Sheldon. European Social Survey 2002/2003: Technical report. & McDonald.A.. M. Perspectives on Psychological Science.).J. L. International Journal of Well-being. J. 108-111. Measuring well-being across Europe: Description of the ESS Well-being Module and preliminary findings. R. H. Forgeard. & Shah. American Psychologist. Peterson. (2002). 102. Culture and “basic” psychological principles.C. F. C. Lima. Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change.. D. Genes. E. 95-108. Social comparisons of income in one’s community: Evidence from national surveys of income and happiness.. (2009).).. Diener (Ed) Perspectives on Psychological Science.F. F. E. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 359: 1435-46.know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective wellbeing’. H. 9. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. Social Indicators Research. (2007). H. and R. Higgins & A. P.. Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. R. 4.

Ryff. T. F. (2000). P. Seligman.D.. Adult Psychiatric Morbidity in England..). SAGE Publications. E. On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being.. 1253-1260. (1988). J. L. (1995). Graversen. (2009). J. 946-963. Secker. G. concomitants (pp. F.. C. Fishwick. Parkinson. & Ropo. L. & Keyes. perceptions. World Values Survey (2007). S.. Tennant. (2009). Applied Psychological Measurement.. 64. A. D. & Jenkins. S..T.. M. & Deci. Ryan. & Schmutte. Health-related quality of life models: Systematic review of the literature. (2001). & StewartBrown.. Smith. 5. 52. A. M. M. Chirkov. (1996) Psychological Medicine.. & Deci.. S.. Steffick. International Journal of Behavioral Development. 54.. L. Welfare production. University of Michigan.worldvaluessurvey.. a. 2007: Results of a Household Survey. No. 9. Vogel... Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. The structure of psychological well-being revisited. 126. The American dream in Russia: Extrinsic aspirations and well-being in two cultures. & Le May. Lee. Education at a Glance 2007: OECD Indicators. M. Toward DSM-V and the classification of psychopathology. & Tellegen.. Y.S. Psychological Inquiry..22 (1477-7525) Stiglitz. Taillefer.... Ekelund.C.. 719-727. Ryan. V. Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-being. Joseph.B. D. Beyond Ponce de Leon and life satisfaction: New directions in quest of successful aging. 1-28. Psychological Bulletin. Glatzer (Ed. 26. J. 19. Dordrecht: Kluwer. (1999). & Singer. poverty and wealth: A comparative and longitudinal perspective.. C. Dupuis. Stewart-Brown. Psychology and Aging. Geneva: Author. Hiller. & Fitoussi. D. Annual Review of Psychology. Sen. 7 15 .McManus. 293-323. 385-401. (2003). The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2007). D. S. Paris: Author. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.A. (1997). M. L. 35–55. S. Social Indicators Research. Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural Research. (2002). R. P. Clark. ICD-l0 Classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Diagnostic criteria for research. Platt. Rep. M. S. R. & Huppert. E. & Clark. 12. Van de Vijver. Retrieved from www. R. Thousand Oaks. Bebbington. (2011). 1. CA. Little.. Documentation of affective functioning measures in the Health and Retirement Study (Tech. Brugha. D.. C. Sheldon.235-270). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Watson. 'Internal construct validity of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): a Rasch analysis using data from the Scottish Health Education Population Survey'. J. New York: Simon & Schuster. S. MI: Survey Research Center. Essex. Whittington.A. Roberge. Rich and poor: Disparities. C. Seligman. My children and me: Mid-life evaluations of grown children and of self. Parkinson. E.A. (1998).E. P. 195–205. 25 .. L. (2009). & Weich. D. B.. The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. A. M. New York: Free Press.. R.. The contours of positive human health. J. S. World Health Organisation (l993). The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): Development and UK validation. K.. (2003) In search of Nordic management styles. B. Tennant. London/Leeds:The NHS Information Centre for Health and Social Care Radloff. Andersen. H.E. Timoshina.. Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress (French Commission on the Measurement of economic Performance and social Progress). G. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. & Leung. (2000). T. 25. (1994). R. 1063-1070. M. J. 1509–1524 Ryff. C. L. J. 141-166. M. Ann Arbor. H. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. L. 9. In W. 491-507.. 69. (2002). A. Ryff. K.-P. Platt. Tennant. HRS/AHEAD). Weich. S. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS. S. 63. Scandinavian Journal of Management.. (1989). Widiger.. I. J.. E. Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfilment. (1977). (2007). S. J. Meltzer. S.. Ryff.

DSM-IV – Generalized Anxiety Disorder A. feeling energetic. using the opposite of the psychological symptoms of DSM-1V and ICD-10 diagnostic criteria for common mental disorders (depression and anxiety) Symptom of disorder DSM-IV – Major Depressive Episode 5 (or more) symptoms present in same 2 week period. Excessive anxiety and worry about events and situations for at least 6 months. 3) Significant weight loss. 8) Diminished ability to think. Positive emotion Meaning Engagement Positive emotion Vitality Self-esteem Meaning Competence Positive wording Positive Feature Interest or pleasure in most activities.. 3 or more of the following symptoms for most days over the previous 6 months: 26 . Capable of thinking clearly. Feelings of worth or worthwhileness (sense of purpose). Balanced emotional response Emotional stability Resilience Positive mood (e. Vitality. as indicated by subjective report (e. concentrating. 5) Psychomotor agitation or retardation nearly every day. 4) Sleep problems nearly every day. Significant difficulty in controlling the anxiety and Ability to manage anxiety and worry. concentrate.g. make decisions. feels sad or empty) 2) Markedly diminished interest or pleasure in all or almost all activities. At least one must be (1) or (2) 1) Depressed mood most of the day. emotional resilience worry.g. C. nearly every day. 7) Feelings of worthlessness or excessive or inappropriate guilt. 6) Fatigue or loss of energy. making decisions. - B. 9) Recurrent thoughts of death.Deriving an operational definition of flourishing.Appendix A . feels happy or has a sense of meaning).

emotionally stable Having sustained energy Ability to concentrate Calm.g. Other common features are: a) Reduced concentration and attention b) Reduced self-esteem and selfconfidence Feeling calm or relaxed. tense or restless. and psychological functioning of adults. contented). Reduced energy leading to increased fatigability and diminished activity. occupational. 2) Easily becoming fatigued or worn out. 4) Irritability. cheerful. 6) Difficulty with sleep.1) Feeling wound up. even-tempered - Emotional stability Vitality Competence Emotional stability - - Positive relationship Engagement Positive mood (e. Loss of interest and enjoyment. Positive features are listed as below. Socially effective. 3) Concentration problems. Interest and enjoyment. Feeling energetic. happy. The full scale is presented and described in the DSM-IV-TR on page 32. has meaningful relationships Interested and involved in a wide range of activities ICD-10 – F32 Depressive Episode The individual usually suffers from: Depressed mood. Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) Used by mental health clinicians and physicians to subjectively rate the social. Positive emotion Engagement Positive emotion Vitality Able to concentrate and pay attention Self-esteem and self-confidence Competence Self-esteem 27 . 5) Significant tension in muscles.

) Source: American Psychiatric Association (2000). feeling “on edge”. tension headaches. Switzerland: World Health Organization.. and usually for several months. dry mouth. The symptoms should usually involve elements of: a) Apprehension (worries about future misfortunes. Being at ease (optimism about the future.Text Revision). ability to concentrate) - Optimism Calmness Competence - - 28 . feeling calm or relaxed. tachycardia or tachypnoea. Geneva. difficulty in concentrating) b) Motor tension (restless fidgeting. International Statistical Classification of Diseases.c) d) e) f) g) Ideas of guilt and unworthiness Bleak and pessimistic views of the future Ideas or acts of self-harm or suicide Disturbed sleep Diminished appetite Feelings of worth and worthwhileness (sense of purpose) Feeling optimistic or hopeful about the future - Self-esteem Meaning Optimism - ICD-10 – F41. epigastric discomfort. trembling. World Health Organization.1 Generalized Anxiety Disorder The sufferer must have primary symptoms of anxiety most days for at least several weeks at a time. 10th Revision (ICD-10). 1992. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th Ed. and c) Autonomic overactivity (lightheadedness. sweating. inability to relax). etc. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association. dizziness.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful