References 1. A Guide to Project Management Body of Knowledge, 2004, 3rd Edition, Project Management Institute, USA 2.

Atkinson, 1999, Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria, International Journal of Project Management Vol. 17, No. 6, pp 337-342, [Electronic] 3. Baguley, 1995, Managing Successful Projects: A guide for every manager, Pitman Publishing, London UK, p8 4. Belassi & Tukel, 1996, A new framework for determining critical success-failure factors in projects, International Journal of Project Management Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 141-151, [Electronic] 5. Cambridge University, The Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary, 2005, 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press, UK 6. Cammack, 2005, Principles of Project Management - 1st session, MSc in Project Management, Lancaster University 7. Cleland & Ireland, 2002, p210, Project Management: Strategic Design and implementation, McGraw-Hill Professional, USA 8. Cleland & Ireland, 2004, Project Manager's Portable Handbook, 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill, USA, page 210 9. Cooke-Davies, The "real" success factors on projects, International Journal of Project Management vol.20, pp. 185–190, [Electronic] 10. Duncan, 2004, Defining and Measuring Project Success, Project Management Partners, [Online], Available: , [2005, Nov.4] 11. Evans, 2005, Overdue and over budget, over and over again, The Economist Jun 9th 2005, [Electronic] 12. Kerzner, 2001, Project Management - A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling and Controlling, 7th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York 13. Kerzner, 2001, Strategic planning for project management using a project management maturity model, Wiley & Sons, New York, page 158 14. Lim & Mohamed, 1999, Criteria of project success: an exploratory re-examination, International Journal of Project Management Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 243-248, [Electronic] 15. Maylor, 2005, Project Management, Third Edition with CD Microsoft Project, Prentice Hall, UK, p288

USA. The project manager’s leadership style as a success factor on projects. 2002. Vol 16. Project Management Institute. Torp.5]] . page 14 22. The Advanced Project Management Office. Improving PM: Linking Success Criteria to Project Type. USA. Radical Project Management. 2001. pp 49-61 .16. 1. Auerbach. Article Source: http://EzineArticles. Vol. [Electronic] 20.Lucie Press. St. Tukel & Rom. Project Management Institute. 2002. Journal of Operations Management. New Directions in Project Management.ittoolkit.htm . Prentice Hall. 1996. No. paper presented to the Southern Alberta Chapter. Tinnirello. [Online]. He has published a series of articles in Ne. Lancaster University. The official website of the Athens 2004 Olympic Games. [Online]. Critical Success factors for project performance: a study from from-end assessments of large public projects in Norway 23. pp43-61 24.6] 19. Available: http://www. 2002. Defining project success. Thomsett. page 18 17. page 16 21. Turner & Muller. [2005.cgi?file=assess_pmsuccess. Analysis of the Characteristics of Projects in diverse industries. 36. Extreme CHAOS: The Standish Group International.O (New Technology Observer). Nov. 1998. 2003. Rad & Article Source: http://EzineArticles. Calgary Symposium Dimitris Litsikakis is currently studying MSc Project Management in one of the top business schools in UK. 2005. 2004. Nov. Austeng & Mengesha. USA. Wideman. Right Track Available: [http://www. [2005. The Standish Group International.athens2004.

Master your semester with Scribd & The New York Times

Special offer for students: Only $4.99/month.

Master your semester with Scribd & The New York Times

Cancel anytime.