You are on page 1of 4

Difference Between Reliability and Validity

Categorized under Miscellaneous | Difference Between Reliability and Validity

Reliability vs validity Reliability and validity seem to be synonymous, but they do not mean the same thing. They are actually different things, different terms when they are explained in a technical manner. These terms are often used on scholastic outputs such as thesis studies, term papers, research papers, and the likes. So to avoid confusion, here are the differences of the two. Reliability is when your measurement is consistent. It means if you are using a certain kind of instrument for a test and the results on the subjects you are testing is the same for the first and second try, then it is considered reliable. There are two ways in estimating whether a certain thing is reliable or not. The first way is the test or retest and the other is the internal consistency. The test and retest is quite easy. You simply test an idea twice, test 1 and test 2. It must be measured twice in different times, then compare the similarities of the results of the two tests. Then, if the results of the two tests are the same, it means that certain measurement is reliable.

The next way in estimating reliability is internal consistency. This can be done by questioning. Make different sets of question that can measure the same factor. Let this be answered by different people or different groups. And even if different people answered these different questions, but still came out with the right thought, then it must be reliable. This is the definition of reliability. Now to differentiate it with validity, it is best to define validity as well. In this way, the confusion between the two terms may be fixed. With this it will be easier to distinguish the two from each other. If reliability is more on consistency, validity is more on how strong the outcomes of the hypothesis are. It answers the question are we right? This means if there is a social experiment on a class concerning discipline and then after the experiment the class became more disciplined, then the strength of the conclusion is very strong. This means the validity too is strong. Validity is categorized into four types, the conclusion, internal validity, construct validity, and external validity. The conclusion validity is focused more on the relationship between the outcome and the program. Internal validity is more on asking what kind of relationship is there between the outcome and the program. Construct validity analyzes how strong the outcome is. External validity is focused more on the general concept of the outcome. These are some of the differences between reliability and validity. SUMMARY: 1. Reliability is more on the consistency of a measurement, while validity is focused more on how strong the outcome of the program was. 2.

Reliability is easier to determine, because validity has more analysis just to know 3. Reliability is determined by tests and internal consistency, while validity has four types, which are the conclusion, internal validity, construct validity, and external validity. how valid a thing is.

Read more: Difference Between Reliability and Validity | Difference Between | Reliability vs Validity http://www.differencebetween.net/miscellaneous/differencebetween-reliability-and-validity/#ixzz2SgNio2bX

A ordinal variable, is one where the order matters but not the difference between values. For example, you might ask patients to express the amount of pain they are feeling on a scale of 1 to 10. A score of 7 means more pain that a score of 5, and that is more than a score of 3. But the difference between the 7 and the 5 may not be the same as that between 5 and 3. The values simply express an order. Another example would be movie ratings, from to

A categorical variable, also called a nominal variable, is for mutual exclusive, but not ordered, categories. For example, your study might compare five different genotypes. You can code the five genotypes with numbers if you want, but the order is arbitrary and any calculations (for example, computing an average) would be meaningless.

Discrete variables describe a finite set of conditions and take values from a finite, usually small, set of states. An example of a discrete variable is Success of the venture, defined in our tutorial on Bayesian networks. This variable can take two values: Success and Failure. Another example might be a variable Hepatitis-B, assuming values True and False. Yet another is Financial gain assuming three values: $10K, $20K, and $50K.

Continuous variables can assume an infinite number of values. An example of a continuous variable is Body temperature, assuming any value between 30 and 45 degrees Celsius. Another might be Financial gain, assuming any monetary value between zero and $50K. __________ 1) Ordinal Variables A discrete ordinal variable is a nominal variable, but its different states are ordered in a meaningful sequence. Ordinal data has order, but the intervals between scale points may be uneven. Because of lack of equal distances, arithmetic operations are impossible, but logical operations can be performed on the ordinal data.

2) Nominal Variables Nominal variables allow for only qualitative classification. That is, they can be measured only in terms of whether the individual items belong to certain distinct categories, but we cannot quantify or even rank order the categories: Nominal data has no order, and the assignment of numbers to categories is purely arbitrary.

3) Discrete Variables

4) Continuous Ordinal Variables They occur when the measurements are continuous, but one is not certain whether they are on a linear scale, the only trustworthy information being the rank order of the observations. For example, if a scale is transformed by an exponential, logarithmic or any other nonlinear monotonic transformation, it loses its interval - scale property. Here, it would be expedient to replace the observations by their ranks.

http://www.unesco.org/webworld/idams/adv . Source(s): . Good Luck!

You might also like