+ +
=
0
2
0
2 2
0
2 2
2
2 2
& &
&
& & ) (1)
The kinetic energy of each attached disk d are:
( ) ( ) ( + + + + + = & &
&
& & 2
2
1
2
1
2
1
2 2 2 2 2
Dy Dx D d
I I w u M T ) (2)
The strain energy of the shaft contains the influence of bending deformation only
without taking into consideration of shear deformation [10] and it is assumed that
coupling of torsional and axial loadings with the flexural motion is unimportant. The
resulting potential energy functional is:
2
dy
y
w
y
u EI
U
L
s
)


.

\

+


.

\

=
0
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
(3)
Bearing forces are taken to be arbitrary linear functions of the transverse
displacements and velocity components at the bearing locations. The virtual work done
by the forces at the bearing locations b is:
( )
( w w B u B w K u K
u w B u B w K u K W
zz zx zz zx
xz xx xz xx b
+ + +
+ + + =
& &
& &
)
(4)
L
l0 0.2
l
0.2 0.2 l
0 0.2 x
y
z
Fig. 1 Kikuchi rotor [8]
Application of Langranges equations to the expressions for the kinetic energy of
shaft disk assembly with unbalance mass, strain energy of shaft and virtual work due to
bearing reactions on the shaft leads to a set of coupled second order linear differential
equations of the form:
t d l f m q K q K q B q B q m
u u
= + + + + sin ) (
2
1 2 12 1 11 2 12 1 11 1
& & & & (5)
t d l f m q K q K q B q B q m
u u
= + + + + cos ) (
2
1 2 22 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 21 2
& & & & (6)
where
( ) ( )   ( ) ( )
+ + + =
l l
d
Dx D
dy y g I dy y f S l g I l f M m
0
2
0
2 2 2
( ) = h R R M
D
2
1
2
2
; ( )
2 2
2
2
1
3 3
12
h R R
M
I I
D
Dz Dx
+ + = = ; ( )
2
2
2
1
2
R R
M
I
D
y D
+ =
2
1
R S = ;
4
2
1
R
I
=
The function that describes spatial coordinates of the orthogonal
displacements and is derived by applying the
( ) y f
( ) y f = ( ) t q t y u
1
) , ( ( ) ( ) t q y f t y w
2
) , ( =
3
boundary conditions for this rotor bearing model given by classical EulerBernoulli first
mode functions [11] for a non rotating freefree beam. The functions are the
first and second derivatives respectively of .
( ) ( ) y h y g ,
( ) y f
( )
21 22
m
K +
( )
12
( )
2
12 21 22
m
K K
2
1
2
1
) (
0
0
) (
u
u
d l f
d l f
22
K
B
K
B
For an aligned journal bearing, classical 8 spring and damping coefficients are
commonly used to model the dynamic radial force interactions between the journal and
bearing. In this work 8 spring and damping coefficients are determined using the
analytical expressions based on the short bearing approximation [8]. In Eqs. (56), the
mass matrix is symmetric, while the damping and stiffness matrices are not symmetric.
The nonsymmetries arise from journal bearings and gyroscopic moments. If the net
energy imparted to the rotor per cycle of harmonic motion by the non conservative force
is negative, then the rotor bearing system is stable for the specified frequency, otherwise
it is unstable [12].
Stability Analysis
The instability determination is based on the study of the rotor bearing system in
free motion.
The characteristic equation for the rotor bearing system is:
0
4 3
2
2
3
1
4
= + + + + a s a s a s a s (7)
where
( )
m
B B
a
22 11
1
+
= ;
( )
2
12 22 11 11
2
m
B B B B K
a
+ =
2
21 21 12 11 22 22 11
3
m
K B K B K B K B
a
+
= ;
11
4
K K
a =
Unbalance Response
The solution of equations of motion (Eqs. 56) with unbalance force of excitation
is to be obtained in the form [5] as:
t B t A q + = cos sin
1 1 1
(8)
t B t A q + = cos sin
2 2 2
(9)
The substitution of Eqs. (8) (9) in Eqs. (5) (6), yields two equations to the
coefficients of . The matrix forms of resulting linear set of equation are: t t cos , sin
(
(
(
(
(
2
2
1
1
2
22 21 21
22
2
22 21 21
12 12
2
11 11
12 12 11
2
11
u
u
m
m
B
A
B
A
m B K B
m K B K
B m K B
K B m K
(10)
4
The solution of Eq. (10) gives values of which are
functions of rotational speed.
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
2 2 1 1
, , , B A B A
The major and minor axis of the elliptical whirl orbits are [8]:
( ) ( ) ( )
2
4
,
2
2 2 1 1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
B A B A B A B A B A B A
B A
+ + + + + +
=
(11)
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The geometry of the rotor bearing system for the symmetric Kikuchi rotor is
given in Table 1. The instability threshold speed for the disksshaftbearings
configuration given in Table 1 is 880 rad/s. The roots of the characteristic equation (Eq.
7) are complex numbers [11] and the imaginary parts of the roots give the frequencies of
the rotor bearing system. When the system becomes unstable, any one of the real part of
complex roots become positive and this indicates growing whirl orbit. The influence of
variation of journal bearing design variables on the instability threshold speed is given in
Table 2. Bearing length, oil viscosity and radial clearance are chosen as the variables as
the journal diameter and load on the bearing are influenced by the rotor design. Instability
threshold speed for L
b
/D ratio of 0.5 (L
b
=0.02 m) is higher compared to L
b
/D ratio of 1.0
and 1.5 (L
b
=0.04 m and L
b
=0.06 m). Reducing the L
b
/D ratio for a given load on bearing,
increases the operating eccentricity ratio and hence increase in instability threshold.
Decrease in oil viscosity from 0.06 Pas to 0.01 Pas also increases the operating
eccentricity ratio and hence instability threshold speed. Instability threshold speed has
decreased with increase in radial clearance from 150x10
6
m to 250x10
6
m. Increase in
clearance obviously increases operating eccentricity ratio (as Sommerfeld number
decreases), however increase in clearance also reduces the bearing spring and damping
coefficients for a given load and speed condition. The influence of distance between the
bearing supports on the instability threshold is given in Table 3. The flexural
displacement of the beam for the end conditions (freefree) is zero when l
o
=0.238 m, and
hence choice of bearing supports at this location results in a lowest value of instability
threshold speed (2.3 rad/s) which indicates that, the instability threshold is lowest when
the flexural displacement of rotor are maximum.
Table 1 Geometry for the Rotor bearing system
Disk Shaft Bearing
R
1
0.02 m L 1.062 m D 0.04 m
R
2
0.119 m 7800 kg/m
3
L
b
0.04 m
H 0.04 m E 2x10
11
N/m
2
C
r
150x10
6
m
7800 kg/m
3
100 1200 rad/s 0.06 Pas
5
m
u1
1.374*10
3
kg L
0
0.131 m W 25.9*9.81 N
d
u1
0.1 m
Table 2 Influence of journal bearing on the instability threshold speeds
L
b
, m Instability
threshold
speed, rad/s
,Pas Instability
threshold
speed, rad/s
C
r
, m Instability
threshold
speed, rad/s
0.02 1118.0 0.01 999.8 150x10
6
880.0
0.04 880.0 0.06 880.0 250x10
6
682.7
0.06 891.0 0.1 887.2 350x10
6
744.0
Table 3 Influence of bearing support span on the instability threshold speeds
l
o
, m 0.131 0.200 0.238 0.300
Instability threshold
speed, rad/s
880.0 294.4 2.3 430.0
Figure 2 shows the Campbell diagram for symmetric rotor. Complex conjugates
roots are obtained when the system becomes unstable. Figure 3 shows the response due to
unbalance excitation for the rotor bearing systems. The unbalance mass is considered for
the first rotor (disk) located at 0.331 m from the origin. The major and minor axes of
elliptical orbit (Eq. 11) are obtained solving [8] the system of linear equations (Eq. 10).
The major axis of the elliptical orbit is indicated as the amplitude of response in Fig. 3.
The unbalance response amplitude for the symmetric rotor increases in magnitude until
the threshold speed of instability and the amplitude of response is nearly constant in the
unstable regime. The unbalance response exhibits forward whirl mode in the range of
rotor speed considered in this study.
CONCLUSION
Rayleigh Ritz method is applied to the rotating shaft with thin rigid disks and
flexible journal bearing supports. The rotor is analyzed by classical beam end conditions
(freefree) in two orthogonal planes. Kinetic energy and strain energy of the rotor
elements and virtual work of flexible bearing supports are calculated. Lagranges
equations are used to derive dynamic equations of rotor motion. Based on the analysis of
diskshaftbearing geometry for the symmetric rotor configuration, the following
conclusions are obtained
1. Journal bearing design variables such as bearing length, oil viscosity and radial
clearance influence the instability threshold. Decreasing the following variables
independently can increase rotor instability threshold speed
a. bearing length
b. oil viscosity
c. radial clearance.
6
2. Rotor flexural displacements significantly influence the instability threshold
speed. The rotor exhibits minimum instability threshold, when the rotor flexure is
maximum.
Kikuchi rotor
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
230 430 630 830 1030 1230
Rotational speed, rad/s
W
h
i
r
l
s
p
e
e
d
,
r
a
d
/
s
Kikuchi rotor
0.0E+00
5.0E07
1.0E06
1.5E06
2.0E06
2.5E06
230 430 630 830 1030 1230
Rotational speed, rad/s
U
n
b
a
l
a
n
c
e
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
,
m
Fig. 2 Campbell diagram Fig. 3 Unbalance response
NOMENCLATURE
C
r
radial clearance (m)
D journal diameter (m)
d
u
unbalance mass location in the disk (m)
E Modulus of elasticity (Pa)
g gravitational acceleration (m/s
2
)
H thickness of the disk (m)
I second moment of area of circular shaft, (m
4
)
I
Dx
, I
Dy
, I
Dz
inertia of the disk in x, y, z directions (Fig. 1) (kg m
2
)
L length of the shaft (m)
l
0
location of the bearings (Fig. 1) (m)
l
1
location of the first disk from the origin of xyz coordinate system, (m)
L
b
length of the bearing (m)
M
D
mass of the rotor (kg)
m
u
unbalance mass of the rotor (kg)
R
1
inner radius of the disk (m)
R
2
outer radius of the disk (m)
S area of shaft (m
2
)
W load on the flexible bearing supports
7
8
x,y,z coordinate system of reference shown in Fig. 1 (m)
viscosity of lubricant (Pas)
density of lubricant (kg/m
3
)
angular velocity of shaft (rad/s)
REFERENCES
1. Lund, J. W., Stability and Damped Critical Speeds of a Flexible Rotor in Fluid
Film Bearings, ASME Journal of Engg. for Industry, pp. 509 517, 1974.
2. Nelson, H. D., and McVaugh, J. M., The Dynamics of RotorBearing Systems
using Finite Elements, ASME Journal of Engg. for Industry, 98, pp. 593 600,
1976.
3. Rieger, N. F., Thomas, C. B., and Walter, W. W., Dynamic Stiffness Matrix
Approach for Rotor Bearing System Analysis, Proc. of IMechE conference on
Vibration in Rotating Machinery, C 187/76, pp. 187 190, 1976.
4. Morton, P.G., Analysis of Rotors Supported on Many Bearings, J. Mech. Engg.
Sci., 14, pp. 25 33, 1972.
5. Lallane, M., and Ferraris, G., Rotor dynamics Prediction in Engineering, John
Wiley and Sons, 1998.
6. Muszynska, A., Fluid Induced Instabilities of Rotors: Whirl and Whip, Bently
Rotor Dynamics Research Corporation Report No. 3., 1995.
7. Lund, J. W., Review of the concept of Dynamic Coefficients for Fluid Film
Journal Bearings, ASME Journal of Tribology, 109, pp. 3741, 1987.
8. Rao, J. S., Rotor Dynamics, New Age International (P) Ltd, 1996.
9. Childs, D., Turbomachinery Rotordynamics, John Wiley and Sons, New York,
1993.
10. Zirkelback, N. L., Ginsberg, J. H., Ritz Series Analysis of Rotating Shaft System:
Validation, Convergence, Mode Functions, and Unbalance Response, ASME
Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, pp. 492 501, 2002.
11. Rao, S. S, Mechanical Vibrations, AddisonWesley Publishing Company, 1990.
12. Adams, M. L., and Padovan, J., Insights into Linearized Rotor Dynamics, Journal
of Sound and Vibration, 76 (1), pp. 129 142, 1981.
Much more than documents.
Discover everything Scribd has to offer, including books and audiobooks from major publishers.
Cancel anytime.