Edgardo Ortega A 16:32 from the trace i have the TAU is succesful in the LAB for idle mode

from 3g to LTE if you do UE attahes on LTE in CASE 8 is it you just do case 3 also its the same scenario Case 3: Session Continuity Delete subscriber from SGSN-MME APN rflab Connect on LTE Start FTP payload Move to 3G No Session Continuity Result: Unsuccessful subscriber still on LTE in the Core Idle and Session Continuity ECM-Connected

and from case 8: Case 8: 3G-LTE-3G -

Subscriber still resident in SGSN-MME Both LTE and 3G in the cage UE attached on 3G Move to LTE TAU rejected UE attaches on LTE Payload started FTP Move to 3G Result: Session continuity works successfully PMM-IDLE

when the Ue attaches in case 8 it will go back to same scenario in case3 so why case 3 fail Nishkar Govender 16:34 thats what our problem is... ;) Edgardo Ortega A 16:35 meaning when you delete the APN something is still left in case3 Nishkar Govender 16:35 case should have no subscriber info. Edgardo Ortega A 16:35 can you please compare the UE attached in case3 and case8 Nishkar Govender 16:35 ~case 3 Edgardo Ortega A 16:36 should be some differenct

you mean imsi attach and the othe is tmsi or GUTI attached can you check this Nishkar Govender 16:37 case 3 is GUTI attach case 8 is also GUTI attach Edgardo Ortega A 16:37 then did the core ask for identity request or not on both of them did core ask for identity request Nishkar Govender 16:38 yes in both cases identity was requested Edgardo Ortega A 16:39 exaclty so its the same scenario we send the identity on the next message right

Feb 16 01:53:20 ASSASN3 pmain[29489]: ascm: Received VARmessage from "probe": ty pe(254) operation(3) id(0) state(0) (uint32)[254004]=(uint16)[0] (uint32)[255001 ]=(uint32)[80] (uint32)[254007]=(uint64)[762843820] (uint32)[254006]=(uint16)[55 4] (uint32)[254001]=(str)[routerSockUp-eth4.2000_r] (uint32)[254002]=(bin)[582] (uint32)[254008]=(addr)[172.18.120.45] (uint32)[254009]=(uint16)[59271] (uint32) [254005]=(addr)[41.206.15.203] (uint32)[254011]=(uint8)[0] (uint32)[254003]=(uin t16)[0] Feb 16 01:53:20 ASSASN3 pmain[29489]: bscm: Received VARmessage from "probe": ty pe(254) operation(3) id(0) state(0) (uint32)[254004]=(uint16)[0] (uint32)[255001 ]=(uint32)[80] (uint32)[254007]=(uint64)[368579244] (uint32)[254006]=(uint16)[80 ] (uint32)[254001]=(str)[routerSockUp-eth4.2000_r] (uint32)[254002]=(bin)[52] (u int32)[254008]=(addr)[172.18.248.21] (uint32)[254009]=(uint16)[56418] (uint32)[2 54005]=(addr)[74.125.0.147] (uint32)[254011]=(uint8)[0] (uint32)[254003]=(uint16 )[0]

line 1251471