This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
December 9, 2010
CASE NO.: 2010-5529
L.T. No. : 05-CA-007205
Neil J. Gillespie
Barker, Rodems & Cook,
P. A., Et AI Appellee I Respondent(s).
Appellant I Petitioner(s),
BY ORDER OF THE COURT:
The petition for writ of prohibition is denied as moot with respect to Judge Martha Cook and is denied in all other respects. The petitioner's motion for order of protection is denied. LaROSE, KHOUZAM, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of the original court order.
Served: Neil J. Gillespie Pat Frank, Clerk ag Ryan Christopher Rodems, Esq. Hon. Martha J. Cook
James Birkhold Clerk
Second District Court of Appeal Case Docket
Case Number: 2D10-5529 Civil Prohibition Petition from Hillsborough County
NEIL J. GILLESPIE vs. BARKER, RODEMS & COOK, P. A., ET AL
Lower Tribunal Case(s): 05-CA-007205
Date Docketed 11/18/2010 11/18/2010 11/19/2010 11/22/2010 11/29/2010
Description Date Due Petition Filed Motion To Appear Forma Pauperis fee waiver approved writ Notice of Filing RESPONSE
Filed By Neil J. Gillespie Neil J. Gillespie
Notes WITH EXHIBITS AND 2 DISKS.
12/08/2010 12/08/2010 12/09/2010 12/09/2010 12/09/2010 12/29/2010 03/03/2011 05/17/2013
Miscellaneous Motion Miscellaneous Motion denial of prohibition Deny Miscellaneous Motion-79a Denied - Order by Judge Case Closed Case Permanent Case Destroyed
Neil J. Gillespie SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Ryan Christopher Rodems, Esq. Response and suggestion of mootness to 947652 petitioner's "verified emergency petition for writ of prohibition". Neil J. Gillespie Reply to respondent's suggestion of mootness and motion for leave to amend petition for writ of prohibition... Neil J. Gillespie To amend petition for writ of prohibition (contained in the reply). Ryan Christopher Rodems, Esq. For dissolution of writ of garnishment 947652 (contained in the reply). as moot
LaRose, Khouzam and Crenshaw SET VIA AUTO PERMANENT APPLICATION
1 of 1
6/13/2013 2:18 PM