Professional Documents
Culture Documents
iVIilitary R e v i ~ w
Ma";<'h 1979
,.
THE PR-OFESSIONAl JOlJRNAl OF THE US ARMY
Published by
us ARMY COMMAND AND GENERAL STAFF COLLEGE
Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 66027
LIEUTENANT GENERAL J. R. THURMAN
BRIGADIER GENERAL ROBERT ARTER
MILITARY REVIEW STAFF
Commandant
Deputy Commandant
Colonel E:dward M Bradford Eddor In ChIef
EDITORIAL STAFF: LIeutenant Colonel Jamie W Walton.
MJlldUl1lg Editor, LIeutenant Colonel Ernest L Webb.
AssoCIate Er/!tCJr
PRODUCTION STAFF M., R Protluc/,on[(1<10t M,
(,II' '''<10'':;''1'' M' A",,)<, Vv P',m.flg Oll,e,"
CIRCULATION Ld.PI ,1 H."p lAd", Jr Asso[ . .Jrp Ed,[,)(,
>.;1,. A Aq" I.lt
... ,
MR ADVISORY BOARD
EX r,,"wr,ll Donn A CnmmdflUer Tr,T1n,ny ,1n(l Doc""-'E'
(("''''h)"rl LW'11endnl Gp'WtJI J R Thurm.l(l Comm,j(l,1{'f Comp,npu Arms
CEn".t Mdlor (,,-n,,al Hume, D Smith Cummano1er l Cf'ntf)f Mdjor
Gf'l'\pr,ll Ht"f'ltv Mdhr [h,PI uS Army R(,sprve Major General ldVern b
\1\,"1"" [10,,1 flllI't}{lJ/ G",l'oB"reau MUIOI Genprll Fred'K Matl,Jifey
[''''''',)"o,'r (,,,,,{1,,,;>11 [{)ftl/lar DevPropm('flt Actllf/tv and Comh.nC'd
I, """'1/ nt'vl'l"n'''en'<; MJ)or GenclJI Ben)amln l Harrison
COlnn'.Itldct Bn9<ldlPr G;>ner.JI J J a'oph" Ass,stant
Dt:'t'"h [om'''"n<l", ["mb,ned Al(ll,s Combat Oevelopmel1t tlerll"lv and
C<>,,,,,,,'I''' M""'" T, 1"""9 [)eH-'lop'>lents Ar;tl\"ty
ACTIVE' Colonel T f 811gg Oe/J,urmem of laa,es Colonel Wa'ne D MeDd
Of'/Mrlment 01 l.d .r: .. H,O" <1/1d [ur"culum Aflmrs Colonel J E:. Sullon
Oe/J.]rrmpnl 01 Re'oufci' MaflVfjPnWfl{ Colonl R A Man,on 01
Un,f,t';' .111(1 [Ofllh,npc, Opera/lolls Dr Dl,dlc-y T Corn,,)h John f MOfllson
[I.n,r of H,s/or Colonel Cor! Acree rv<ltHJnal GuJrd Bl.lrf'au Mr Roy
Root Ollr((! 01 II,l' Chief Army Reserve Colonel W 5 Raypr Comboned Arm3
[om/wf Ot'vp1oomen/ AC',v,ty and Comblfwa Arms r'iJInf(lg Oevefoprrrents
LIeutenant Colonul J05l'Pl1 E BurlaS uS Armv Ja"ofl and IX Corps.
M"lnr W J (IH:\nIPIOu Adm,(l,<;trtltlOfl C{'nter Major C W Mclnnls LOfj'';TICS
[enUJr C01Unl'! D fortes. CommanQ
I' :.
Military Review
VOLUME LlX MARCH 1979
NO 3
PAGE 2
10
17
26
40
44
57
65
70
76
CONTENTS
AIR SUPERIORITY AT THE TREETOPS
by Lieutenant Colonel Retsae H. Miller, US Army
WHAT ABOUT MULTINATIONAL CORPS IN NAT07
by Colonel Wolfgang Gerhardt, FRG Army
WINTER WARFARE BY ANY OTHER NAME
by Lieutenant Colonel Richard A Dixon, US Army
COUNTERINSURGENCY IN RHODESIA
by Captain James K. Bruton Jr .. US Army Reserve
AN OLD SOLDIER SPEAKS
by General Walter T Kerwin Jr, US Army, Relired
CHANGING DIMENSIONS OF MILITARY PROFESSIONALISM
by Lieutenant Colonel Sam C Sarkes!an, US Army, Retired
SOVIET CiVil DEFENSE SOME MYTHS IN THE WEStERN DEBATE
by Fred M Kaplan
YOU MUST BELIEVE
by MalOI Dennis Carlin, US Army
A METHOD FOR DEVELOPING DOCTRINE
by Major John W Taylor, US Army
REVIEWS from reports and loumals
79 STUDIES
80 LETTERS
83 NEWS
88 BOOKS contemporary reading for the profess,!:nal
MILITARY REVIEW IS published monthly on English and Spanish and quarterly 10 Portuguese Use of
funds for prmtmg thiS publication approved bv Headquarters. Department of U1e Army, 30 May 1978
Controlled CIrculatIOn postage paid at Leavenworth. KS 66048 and Topeka. KS 66608 SubscnpliOn
$1200 per year US and APO/FPO. $1400 foreign Son91e copies $1 50 US and APO/FPO. $17(;
foreign Address all mall to Military Re,new. USACGSC. Fort Leavenworth. KS 66027 Telephone (913)
6845642 or AUTOVON 5525642 Unless otherWise stated. the views herem are those of the authors
and are not necessarily those of the Department of Defense or any element thereof BaSIS of offiCial
distribution IS ann pm general officer and one pm five flold grode officers
MILITARY REVIEW (USPS 123830) US ISSN 0026-4148
BE SELECTIVE; SELECT MR.
,------------ -- --
,
I
I
S!
vi
I
B
S
c:
I
R:
I
II
B
E
o
0
0
.0
MILITARY REVIEW
FORT LEAVENWORTH, KS. 66027
Please (enter) (renew) my subscription to the Military Review for one year ($12 00 US and
APO FPO) IS14 00 la,ergnl '
Check Money Order Inclosed 0 Check Hetre o Army
o Actwe
for Automatic o ARNG
o Retrred
Bdl me Renewal o USAR
o USN, USAF, USMC, USCG
Please change my address to that shown below D CIvIlian
RANK TITLE FIRST NAME" INITIAL LAST NAME
STRFfT
CITY STATE COUNTRY liP CODE
T
J ThiS professional mdltary Journal IS ta)(-deductlble
1 _____ - ____________________________________________ _
I
0:
n!
A
y
,
J
MILITARY REVIEW
FORT LEAVENWORTH, KS. 66027
D Please (enter) (renew) my subscription to the Military Review for one year (S12 00 US and
APO FPOIIS14 00 la,ergn)
0 Check I Money Order Inclosed 0 Check Here o Army
D ActIve
for Automatic o ARNG
d Retrred
0 8111 me
Renewal o USAR
o USN. USAF, USMC, USCG
0 Please change my address to that shown below
D CIVIlian
RANK 'TITLE FIRST NAME INITIAL LAST NAME
STREET
CITY STATE! COUNTRY ZIP CODE
ThiS professional military Journal IS tax-deductible
"-- ------------------------m II r----- - ~ ~ ~ ~ ; , ~ - - 'ii
It" MAILED
BUSINESS REPLY MAIL-
FlHS r CLASS PERMIT Nu 4 FT LEAVF"NWORTH KS
POSTAGE. V\ILl HE PAID 8'1' ADDRI:.SSl:.l
Military Review
U.S. Army Command and General Staff College
Fort Leave.lworth. Kansas 66027
IN THE '
UNITED STATES
I
I
I
,
I
,
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
-------------------------------1--------------------:
- IIIII NO POS T AGE :
NECESSARY
7
BUSINESS REPLY MAIL
FIRST CLASS PERMIT No 4 F1 LEAVENWORTH KS
POSTAGE Will at" PAID BY ADDRESSEE
Military. Review
U.S. Army Command and General St,!ff College
Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 66027
IF" MAILED
IN THE
UNITED SrATES
Salute to NATO
1979 the 30th anniversary of the :-.iorth Atlantic Treaty Organization, an
alhance so famlhar to us that Its acronym, NATO, no longer needs to be defined in
our lIterature. Thl' well-organlled defemive system, created by the allies and Joined
by signature In April of 1949, has provided a basis of stability and confidence fiom
which we have been able to guarantee our collective security for three decades.
We often forget that the post-World War II era of NATO's beginmng was different
from the world as we now know It. The' threat \\a, clearly v ISIble.! he former allies
of the \\ar, diSillusioned by the SOViets' unwilhngness to live In peace and harmony
WIth all nations. and fearful of possible further Sonet expansion westward. were
compelled to onCe again seek alliance for their common defense. A dangerous
clImate of In'tabillty prevaIled.
Since then. things ba\e changed Through ;'o;ATO. a stable military and pohtical
balance ha, been created bet\\een Ea,t and West NegotIatIons for pOSSIble mutual
and balanced reductiOn> of mIlitary forces and other measures aimed at easing
ten'lom were begun and are continuing In the meantime, we 'have also beeome
\\I,er. We arc a\\arc of our shortcoming, In the area of standardl7ed forces. We
kno\\ that the 1 hreat continue, to Impro\e It> military posture and strengths. Two
NA I 0 member; havc wIthdra\\n theH forces from the command. Many incon-
'I,tcncle' In thc ceonOl1l1e fIeld remain. and common development of equipment
and wcapon i, lar trom Ideal. H,mever. \\e mu,t not be misled into
thinking Lh,1l the deflclcncles di'played by :-':A TO mean a weak organi7atlon. It IS
not Much ha' been accomplIshed In three decades. Continuing Improvement m
unctc"tandm/!. rcdeplclyment. and pohtlcal will all add up to a mighty
alliance.
:\e\t month. thl' Ili/ira!"r R"I'I<'II Will f"CU' on thl' AtlantiC alliance of ours, Some
of our article, will dc,cribc not only mIlItary cOl1SlctcraUoll> of the alliance hut
It, politlcal and ml,!ani/atIon:1l Ljllc,Uons a, wdl. Thi, month. our salllte-next
mOllth. a look. /
f ,fl'l
"'" :
DEPAR1l.IEliTOF1HEAftMY
Mlll1ARVREVIEW
u.s. ARMY COMMAND & GENERAL STAFF COLLGt
FORT LEAVENWORlII. KANSAS 6SM7
BUSINESS
PENALTY fOR PRIVATE USE $300
CGst
ISFt878
I
POSTAGE AND ms PAlO
DEPARTMENT OF tHE ARMY
000 314
CONTROLLED CIRCULATION
Air Superiority
at __ Treetops
Lieutenant Colonel Retsae H. Miller, US Army
The United Slates emerged from the Vietnam conflict as the
undisputed expert in tactical employment of helicopters.
/{owever, the Soviets appreciated the role of helicopters in
future warfare and are rapidly expanding their use of attack
helicopters and airmobile forces. In an oversimplified way,
our doctrine calls for the Army to win the ground battle and
the Air Force to win the air battle. But there is a gray area:
the 100 feet abpve the battlefield. There is where the
helicopters u'ill be flying. What happens if the Soviets use
their attack helicopters in an air-to-air role against our
attack helicopters waiting to pounce on their massed ar-
mored and mechanized units? In the event of a Soviet
airmobile. assault, do our" helicupters attack the Soviet
helicopters, or do they continue to fight the battle to our
front? If we are to win the land battle, we must have air-
superiority at the treetops. Within present dollar con-
straints, what can we do? One answer is to equip our
advanced scout helicopters (ASHs) with air-to-air weapons.
In this way, the ASH can provide our attack helicopters
security against Soviet attack helicopters, become a potent
weapon against Soviet airmobile forces and continue its role
as scout. A larger question remains unresolved: Do we have
the time and funds to 'go through a long and expensivf
research and development cycle, or wlfwld an off-the-shelf
commercial helicopter be just as effective once it has been
" " .
2
, !
\
W
ORLD War I introduced three
very lethal weapons. They were
the machinegun, the tank and the
airplane. German military planners
were quick to realize the impact of
these systems. Between World Wars I
and II, the German army refined its
concept of warfare and built its ground
forces around the mass employment of
mechanized forces. One only has to
look to the successes of Rommel and
Guderian to realize the extent to which
the German High Command had
adopted the use of these new tactics
,and weapons. In contrast, only a few
farsighted individuals in the US Army
such as George S. Patton Jr. had fully
realized the impact that armor was to
have on future warfare.
In South Vietnam, the US Army
quickly embraced the concept of air-
mobile warfare. Tactical necessity and
the obvious advantages to be gained
by using the helicopter to provide both
firepower and mobility in a war that
was classified asr-t'tow intensity"
overcame previous prejudices toward
helicopter vulnerabilities. The United
States emerged out of Vietnam as the
world's leader in helicopter warfare.
However, as the emphR.sis shifted from
the rice paddies of Vietnam to the
complex problems associated with
fighting in Europe, the US Army
began again to question the sur
vivability of helicopters in combat.
Forgotten were the previously
favorable findings of the Howze Board
and 11 th Air Assault tests of the early
1960s that examined the use of
helicopter-borne forces in mid-intensity
conflict even though these findings
were verified in actual combat. In
conditions approximating mid-
intensity warfare, as experienced in
Lam Son 719 and An Loc, we lellrned
AIR SUPERIORITY
that helicopters could survive if flown
in the "nap of the earth" and equipped
with aircraft survivability equipment.
These findings were further substan-
tiated by tests conduded at Fort Hood,
Texas, by Project MASSTER.
The "nap of the earth" envelope
limited helicopters to a relatively small
layer of maneuver area determined to
be that air space that begins just a few
feet above the ground and extends
upward to approximately .100 feet.
Because of the lethality of air defense
systems, it is ~ o w a foregone con-
cl usion that all helicopters, friendly
and enemy, will have to operate in this
portion of the atmosphere.
As the German High Command
realized the importance of armor before
World War II, NATO's potential
,-adversary, the Soviet Union, has
realized the importance of the role of
the helicopter in future warfare. The.
Soviets' use of both attack helicopters
and airmobile force'S is expanding at
an alarming rate. This implies that
NATO's use of the air space at or near
the treetops could be hotly contested by
Warsaw Pact helicopter forces if
hostilities were to erupt.
It must. be realized now by US
planners and our NATO allies that the
helicopter will have a significant
impact on winning or losing the land
battle. This means that our helicopter
systems, doctrine, force structure and
training must concentrate on winning
the helicopter battle in order to ensure
success on the ground. In order to
accomplish this, we must gain and
maintain air superiority" at the
treetops.
To what extent does the Soviet
Union appreciate the advantages
gained by the helicopter and air-
mobility? The recent Ogaden War in
MILITARY REVIEW
Ethiopia supplies the answer. Soviet
Mi6 helicopters supported tbe Cuban-
Soviet attack against Somali forces by'
flying troops, supplies and equipment
across the Ahmar Mountains. Some
observers reported the transportation
of PT76 tanks by these helicopters.
The entire operation was a coor-
dinated combined arms attack using
armor, macserl artillery, tactical air
and helicoptE'rs to envelop the Somali
strongpoint in the vicinity of Jit'iga.
JVelL'swc('k
'
quoted an Arab mil' ary
attache' saying "it was over al ost
before it start<,rl. It was the kind of
maneuv<'r that up to now has been
donI' only on paper maps in staff
collches." The implications are
ominous.
In this age of systems analysis of
tomorrow's jJossible battlefield In
Europe, combined arms planners have
to finrl the best 'solution to
the complex problem of fighting out-
numbered anrl winning. Allocations of
NATO ground combat power versus
Warsaw Pact ground combat power
have bl'l'n clmlely scrutinIzed in order
to maximize effectiveness and lreduce
the risks of defeat. The eml1rgence of
the active defense has been the fallout
of this scrutiny. It is apparent that Air
Force planners h'ave applied
themselvcs to the tasks of developipg
tactics to be employed in winning tre
ail' battle in Europe. ,
Emphasis has been placerl by Air
Force planners on fighting air battles
above 100 feet and by Army planners
on conrlucting ground combat, but who
is looking from ground level to 100
feet'! Exactly how will we fight in this
vital area of the battlefield?
The JA WS (Joint Air Weapons
System) exercise
2
that resulted in a
draft manual entitled Joint Air Attack
4
.1
Team T-actics (JAA'l'T) is the first
major step toward achieving an un-
derstanding of how. we should use this
air space to. our best .tactical ad-
vantage. Air-toair engagements by
helicopters were examined by the US
Army Aviation Center during the ACE
(Air Combat Engagements) studies'
conducted at Fort Rucker, Alabama, in
the fall of 1977. The result was the
funding of a' joint project (Air Force
and Army) entitled J-CATCH (Joint
Countering of Attack Helicopters).
/ This project .has been tasked with the
dFelopment of methods of countering
tl1e growing Soviet armed helicopter
threat. ' ,
In order to gather additional in-
sights into the 'relative value of this air.
.space. let's examine several scenarios
in which our attack helicopters are
employed as a combat multiplier to
provide the flexible response vital to
the conduct of the active defense. Upon
completion of thE' description of each
vignette, we will attempt, to assess
impact of the introduction of Soviet
attack helicopters into these situations.