This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
סייג לזכויות האדם
ד"ר יוסף צרניק Joseph Zernik, PhD 3144 ירושלים,31440 ת"דPO Box 31440, Jerusalem 91313
13-06-18 Zernik v Minister of Justice et al (2689/13) in the Israeli Supreme Court – no response at all by the Responders No responses were received by the Petitioner to this date. Likewise, recent court decisions/notices were not delivered as well. Notice of failure to deliber was filed with the Supreme Court today.
LINKS:  13-04-15 Dr Zernik v Justice Minister Livni and Director of Administration of the Courts
Spitzer (2689/13) – Petition in the High Court of Justice of the State of Israel (Hebrew with English translation)) http://www.scribd.com/doc/136215148/
Note: The Index entry appears as valid opening of a petition file.
2. General Details
File #: 2689 HCJ Appellant: Dr Joseph Zernik Division: High Court of Justice Respondent: Minister of Justice Filing Date:April 15, 2013 Status: Open Last event: Notice Filed/ by the Petitioner Note: 1) The Petitioner is falsely listed as an “Appellant” 2) Filing Date: April 15, 2013 – although the petition was stamped “Received” on April 15, 2013, the Office of the Clerk refuses to register is as “Filing of Petition Process” or even “Document Filed”, under “Events”. 3) Last Event: “Notice Filed by the Petitioner”, is incorrect – the latest papers, which were filed on May 23, 2013, were all “Requests”.
Type: # Petitioner 1 Respondent Respondent
Name Attorneys Dr Joseph Zernik 1 Minister of Justice Tzipi Livni Bert, Yitzhaq 2 Director of Administration of Courts Michael SpitzerBarak Laser, Barak, State Attorney
Note: 1) Here the filer is listed as “Petitioner” 2) No certificate of Attorneys of Record for the Respondents: Attorneys Bert, Yitzhaq and Laser, Baraq has been filed or served so far. Request for the filing and service of certificates of Counsel of Record were subject of one of the May 23, 2013 Requests.
4. Related Cases
"No records were found in the requested range”.
5. Lower Court File
"No records were found in the requested range”. 6. Proceedings
"No records were found in the requested range”.
7. Events (3 screen prints to cover all events)
# 1. 2. 2. 2. 2.
Main Event Fees Decision Decision Decision Decision
Secondary Event Fees Paid Decision released Decision mailed Decision mailed Decision mailed
Date April 15, 2013 April 18, 2013 April 18, 2013 April 18, 2013 April 18, 2013
Filer Dr Zernik
2. 2. 3. 4. 4. 5. 6. 6. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 12. 13.
Decision Decision mailed April 18, 2013 Decision Decision mailed April 18, 2013 Paper filed Filed paper April 21, 2013 Dr Zernik Paper filed Filed paper April 21, 2013 Dr Zernik Paper filed Filed paper April 21, 2013 Dr Zernik Notice filed Failure to receive paperApril 29, 2013 Spitzer Process filed Filed process May 1, 2013 Process filed Mailing May 1, 2013 Process filed Mailing May 1, 2013 Notice filed Notice by Petitioner May 6, 2013 Paper filed Filed paper May 9, 2013 Notice filed Notice by the Petitioner May 12, 2013 Dr Zernik Notice filed Notice by the Petitioner May 26, 2013 Dr Zernik Warning of failure to act Sent to responder May 6, 2013 Decision Decision released May 9, 2013 Decision Decision mailed to parties June 10, 2013 Response filed Responder's response June 12, 2013 State Attorney
General Notes: 1. The electronic record system of the Supreme Court is inherently invalid, since it fails to include a “docket” - a list of papers filed in court and entered into the court file. 2. The closest to a docket that the system shows is the list of “Events”. 3. The reason for the five (5) listings of mailing of a decision remains unknown. 3. Evidently, the system provided the option to enter free text under “Secondary Event”, describing the papers, which were filed. See for example: 5. Notice filed Failure to receive paper However, the filing of papers by petitioner is left uniquely vague and ambiguous by listings such as: 4. Paper filed Filed paper 4. The listing of of papers filed, where no party is listed as the “Filer” should be deemed invalid. Specific Notes: The list of events in this case is false and deliberately misleading: 1. The filing of commencing paper – the Petition, which was stamped “Received” on April 15, 2013, was never registered to this date. 2. The event listed on April 21, 2013 “Paper Filed/Filed Paper” is probably in reference to the protest letter, mailed to Supreme Court Presiding Justice Asher
Grunis, relative to the failure to register the filing of commencing paper in this case. Why it is listed three times remains unknown. 3. No paper was filed on May 1, 2013, and the listing (3 times) of “Process Filed” on that date is false. Moreover, according to the registration, the “Process” was filed by no party at all. The correct registration should have been “Petition filed” on April 15, 2013. 4. On May 5, 2013, Petitioner Zernik filed “Request to Add Paper: “Additional evidence of corruption in the Tel Aviv District Court and Net HaMishpat as the Enabler.” The paper was not registered under “Events” at all. 5. On May 6, 2013, when no paper was filed by the Petitioner, the registration shows “Notice Filed”, but no party name is listed under “Filer”. This notice most likely refers to the repeat faxing on May 5, 2013, of protest letter No 2 to the Presiding Justice, pertaining to false registration of the Petition.
13-05-02 Zernik v Minister of Justice et al (2689/13) in the Israeli Supreme Court – Request No 2 to Presiding Justice - for honest registration, alternatively - refund of filing fees
6. On May 12, 2013, no “Notice” was filed by the Petitioner, but a “Request” to provide a certified copy of the April 18, 2013 Decision record by Justice Hayut. 7. Requests, which were filed on May 23, 2013, were not registered at all...
13-05-23 Zernik v Minister of Justice et al (2689/13) Request for review by a panel of 3 justices of the Israeli Supreme Court http://www.scribd.com/doc/143227425/ 13-05-23 Zernik v Minister of Justice et al (2689/13) - Request for Certificates of Counsel of Record http://www.scribd.com/doc/143763214/ 13-05-23 Zernik v Minister of Justice et al (2689/13) - Request for entry and service of decisions on requests
13-05-23 Zernik v Minister of Justice et al (2689/13) - Request to add a document - Judge Esperanza Alon - master of the "mystical secrets of court procedure", or "obstructionist with impunity"?
8. Notice, which is registered on May 26, 2013, is an unknown record.