Are you sure?
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
2527 JUNE, 2009, VELIKO TARNOVO, BULGARIA
Voltage Source Inverter Connected to the Grid with Nonlinear Filter Inductor
Georgi Kunov1, Elissaveta Gadjeva2, Dimitar Todorov3
Abstract – In this paper, the grid connected voltage fed inverter with a hysteresis current control is investigated. The influence on the minimal and the maximal commutation frequency for the transistors when applying filter inductor with a nonlinear inductance is a subject of consideration. A computer PSpice macromodel of the nonlinear inductance is developed. A control system, realizing this mode of operation, is presented. The simulation results of the developed control system with a nonlinear inductance are given. Keywords – Full bridge transistor DCAC Hysteresis limits control system, PSpice simulation converter,
of investigation of the paper is the influence on the minimal and the maximal commutation frequency for the transistors when applying filter inductor with a nonlinear inductance.
II. PRINCIPLE OF OPERATION OF GRID CONNECTED
VOLTAGE INVERTER
I. INTRODUCTION
Many types of voltage fed inverters are used in the contemporary power electronic devices to convert dc to ac. There are two types of inverters: standalone and grid connected. These two inverter types have several similarities, but they are different in terms of control function. A standalone inverter is used in off grid applications with battery storage. Grid interactive inverters must follow the voltage and frequency characteristics of the utility generated power presented on the distribution line. A typical application of the grid connected voltage inverter is in the photovoltaic (PV) systems [1]. The main two requirements from the power supply to the inverter are: the requirement for the inverted current to be in same phase with the voltage of the mains network, and the requirement for the inverted current to be with minimal highorder harmonic components. The second requirement means that the waveforms of the inverted current have to be near to sinusoidal signals. In order to obtain sinusoidal current, a number of algorithms for voltage inverter control are used. They are presented in a synthesized form in [2]. In the case of grid connected voltage inverters, the average current mode control [3] and the hysteresis current control [4] are mostly used. In the present paper, the method of hysteresis current control is used. Besides the near to sinusoidal shape of the inverted current and the low values of the highorder harmonics, this method is characterized by a variable commutation frequency of the inverter transistors. A subject
Georgi Kunov is with the Faculty of Electronic Engineering and Technologies, Technical University of Sofia, Klimenrt Ohridski Blvd. 8, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria, Email: gkunov@tusofia.bg 2 Elissaveta Gadjeva is with the Faculty of Electronic Engineering and Technologies, Technical University of Sofia, Klimenrt Ohridski Blvd. 8, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria, Email: egadjeva@tusofia.bg 3 Dimitar Todorov is with the Faculty of Electronic Engineering and Technologies, Technical University of Sofia, Klimenrt Ohridski Blvd. 8, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria, Email: dgt@tusofia.bg
1
The circuit of the grid connected voltage inverter is shown in Fig. 1. The value of the DC source has to be greater than the magnitude of the line voltage in order to ensure normal operation of the circuit. In this manner, the principle of operation of the circuit is reduced to the principle of operation of BUCK DCDC converter with a load the line voltage.
Eg 1 E GAIN = 3
Q1
IRF460
Q2
IRF460
Eg2 E GAIN = 3
+ 
Vg1
+ 
+ 
Rg1 10 Rcs 1m
Rg2 10
+ 
Vg2 0
0
Lnl 400Vdc
+ 
+ 
VPV
Ecs E GAIN = 1000 0
GAIN = 1 HIx = 15A HIy = 40mH LOx = 5A LOy = 20mH
Vac
VOFF = 0V VAMPL = 310V FREQ = 50Hz
I
Eg 4 E GAIN = 3
Q4
IRF460
Vcs
Q3
IRF460
Eg 3 E GAIN = 3
+ 
VN
+ 
+ 
Rg4
1k
Rg3
10
+ 
VP 0
0 0
Fig. 1. Grid connected voltage inverter
During the positive waveform of the line voltage, the inverter works according to the equivalent circuit shown in Fig. 2. In this timeinterval the transistors Q2 and Q4 are turnoff, Q3 is turnon during the whole halfperiod, and Q1 is commutated by the frequency, defined by the control system. The incorporated reverse diode of the transistor Q4 acts as a freewheeling diode of the BUCK DCDC converter.
E Eg 1 GAIN = 3
Q1
IRF460
BUCKPositive Waveform
Vg1
+ 
+ 
Rg1
10
0 VPV 400Vdc
Rcs 1m
Irisepositive V_Line Lnl
(+)
()
Ecs E GAIN = 1000 0
FREQ = 50Hz VAMPL = 310V VOFF = 0V
Q3
IRF460
+ 
E Eg 3 GAIN = 3
+ 
+

Dreve rse /Q4
Vcs
Rg3
10
+ 
VP
Ifallpositive
0
0
Fig. 2. Equivalent circuit for the positive waveform
503
ICEST 2009
BUCKNegative Waveform
Q2
IRF460 Eg 2 E GAIN = 3
+ 
2527 JUNE, 2009, VELIKO TARNOVO, BULGARIA
Rg2 10
+ 
V g2 0
VPV 400V dc
Eg4 E GAIN = 3 VN
Rcs 1m
Irisenegative V _Line Lnl
()
(+)
Q4
IRF460
Ecs E GAIN = 1000 0
FREQ = 50Hz VAMPL = 310V VOFF = 0V
+ 
+ 
+

+ 
Rg4
10
V cs
Dre ve rs e /Q3 Ifallnegative
0
0
Fig. 3. Equivalent circuit for the negative waveform
During the negative waveform of the line voltage, the inverter works according to the equivalent circuit shown in Fig. 3. In this timeinterval the transistors Q1 and Q3 are turnoff, Q4 is turnon during the whole halfperiod, and Q2 is commutated by the frequency, defined by the control system. The incorporated reverse diode of the transistor Q3 acts as a freewheeling diode of the BUCK DCDC converter. The algorithm of operation of the power circuit, described above, is illustrated by the waveforms shown in Fig. 4. The concrete control system with a hysteresis current control [5], realizing the described algorithm, is presented in Fig. 5.
Fig. 4. Illustration of algorithm of operation
III. MODELING OF NONLINEAR INDUCTANCE
A. Description of the parameterized PSpice model of nonlinear inductance The nonlinear dependence Lnl = f(i) shown in Fig. 6 is modeled by the following expression:
Vcs
R1 5.1k D3 D1N4148
11
⎛ abs(i ) − B x ⎞ ⎟ L(i ) = − B y − Ay tanh ⎜ ⎜G ⎟ + LO y + HI y Ax ⎝ ⎠ where HI y − LO y HI + LO y Ay = ; By = y 2 2 HI x − LO x HI + LO x Ax = ; Bx = x 2 2 LO x = i min HI x = i max
LO y = Lmin HI y = Lmax
(1)
The nonlinear inductance model is developed in the form of parameterized subcircuit in two variants: using schematic view and using subcircuit description in text form.
+5V U22 TOPEN = 2us
1 U1A LM319 4 + +12V +5V 2 R3 510 12 3 1 U4A 74HC04 2 U8A 74HC08 3 1 2 1 2 U9A 74HC08 3 R12 10k U12A 74HC32 3 1 2 U14A 74HC00 3 1 2 13 R14 1k
R2 5.1k 5 Rh1 100
V
V+
0
U16A 74HC11 12
OUT V
G
D4 D1N4148
0 0
U6A 74HC04 2 1 2 U10A 74HC08 3
Vg1
6
12V U2A LM319 4 R6 5.1k 5 Rh2 1k
V
+12V +5V
11
0
R13
10k
R5 5.1k
D5 D1N4148
1 R7 510
+
V+
1 1 1 2 U11A 74HC08 3 2 U13A 74HC32 3 2 U15A 74HC00 3
OUT V
12 3
1 2 13
U17A 74HC11
12
Vg2
G
D6 D1N4148
12V
0
Vcc 12Vdc
+12V Vee 12Vdc
12V Vdd 5Vdc
+5V 1 2 13 U18A 74HC11 12
0
P ARAM E T ERS:
Vrefvar = 10V R9 10k
11
U3A LM319 4 +
6
+12V +5V R11 510 12 3 1 2 U7A 74HC14
VP
V+
0
1 2 13 U19A 74HC11 12
Vacre f
VOFF = 0V VAMPL = {Vref v ar} FREQ = 50Hz
OUT V
5 R10 10k
G
VN
12V
0
0
0
6
Fig. 5. Hysteresis current mode control system
504
ICEST 2009
2527 JUNE, 2009, VELIKO TARNOVO, BULGARIA
L_nonlin
1 IOFF = 0 IAMPL = 20A FREQ = 1kHz
2
Ay = {(@HIy @LOy )/2} By = {(@HIy +@LOy )/2} Ax = {(@HIx@LOx)/2} Bx = {(@HIx+@LOx)/2}
Iin
I
GAIN = 2 HIx = 15A HIy = 40mH LOx = 2A LOy = 10mH
0
Fig. 6. The nonlinear dependence Lnl = f(i)
L_nonlin
Fig. 9. Testing of the inductance model
1
2
Fig. 7. Block definition of the inductance model
1
IN OUTIN+ OUT+ G1 GVALUE {V(L)*I(Vsense)}
VL
1
L1 1
Vsense E2 IN+ OUT+ IN OUTEVALUE {1*V(VL)} 3
Fig. 10. The modeled dependence L(i)
2
0
L 2 {@By (@Ay *TANH(@GAIN*(abs(I(Vsense))@Bx)/@Ax))+@LOy +@HIy }
In order to test the behavior of the inductance model, the circuit shown in Fig. 9 is used. The sinusoidal independent current source Iin with a amplitude 20A is used. The modeled dependence L(i) is shown in Fig. 10. C. Parameterized PSpice model of nonlinear inductance using subcircuit description in text form In this case the block is connected to the PSpice subcircuit model in text form. The description of the library element has the form: .subckt Lnl1 1 2 Params: Ax=1 Bx=1 Ay=1 + By=1 GAIN=1 LOy=1 HIy=1 Vsense 1 3 0 E_VL 3 2 VALUE={1*V(VL)} E_L L 0 VALUE {By (Ay*TANH(GAIN* (abs(I(Vsense))Bx)/Ax))+LOy+HIy} G_PSI 0 VL VALUE={V(L)*I(Vsense)} L_VL VL 0 1 .ends The block description is in the form: X_Lnl1 %1 %2 Lnl1 PARAMS: Ax={(@HIx@LOx)/2} Bx={(@HIx+@LOx)/2} \n+ Ay={(@HIy@LOy)/2} By={(@HIy+@LOy)/2} GAIN={@GAIN} \n+ LOy={@LOy} HIy={@HIy} In this way, the block parameters are transferred to the subcircuit. The circuit input file has the form:
Fig. 8. Schematic description of the inductance model
B. Parameterized PSpice model of nonlinear inductance using ABM elements A block definition is used to construct the model as shown in Fig. 7. The schematic description of the model is presented in Fig. 8. The ABM block models the dependence L(i) according to (1), represented by the value V(L) .The dependence L(i) according to (1) is realized by the PSpice expression: {@By (@Ay*TANH(@GAIN*(abs(I(Vsense))@Bx)/@Ax))+@LOy+@HIy} The dependent current source G1 models the flux ψ = L(i ).i , represented by the value V(VL)= {V(L)*I(Vsense)} The voltage uL (t ) has the form:
u L (t ) =
dψ L ( t ) d = (L(i L (t )).i L (t )) . dt dt
(2)
uL (t ) is obtained across the inductance L1 in the model shown in Fig. 8. The VCVS E2 is of value {1*V(VL)}. As a result, the block realizes an inductor with nonlinear inductance, connected between nodes 1 and 2.
505
ICEST 2009
2527 JUNE, 2009, VELIKO TARNOVO, BULGARIA
Fig. 11. Simulation results for the case of linear inductance – Llin=12mH
Fig. 12. Simulation results for the case of nonlinear inductance – Lnonlin=12mH/10A; Lnonlin=30mH/1A
.LIB ".\lnonl.lib" .lib "nom.lib" .TRAN 0 5ms 0 1u SKIPBP .PROBE V(*) I(*) D(*) R_R1 0 UL 1T X_Lnl1 UL 0 Lnl1 PARAMS: Ax={(15A1A)/2} + Bx={(15A+1A)/2} Ay={(40mH10mH)/2} + By={(40mH+10mH)/2} GAIN={2} + LOy={10mH} HIy={40mH} I_Iin 0 UL DC 0Adc AC 0Aac +SIN 0 20A 1kHz 0 0 0 .END
V. CONCLUSION
The grid connected voltage fed inverter with a hysteresis current control has been investigated. The dependence of the minimal and the maximal commutation frequency for the transistors when applying filter inductor with a nonlinear inductance is considered. A computer macromodel of the nonlinear inductance is developed in accordance with the input language of the PSpice simulator and the model description is given. The simulation results of the developed control system with a nonlinear inductance are presented.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The investigations are supported by the R&D project 091ni04103/2009 with the Technical University of Sofia.
IV. SIMULATION RESULTS
The simulation results of the grid connected voltage inverter with sine band hysteresis control are shown in Fig. 11 and Fig. 12. It is seen that for the value of linear inductance equal to the nonlinear inductance corresponding to the magnitude value of the sinusoidal current, the commutation frequency of the inverter transistors is the same. As a result of the fact, that the nonlinear inductance value increases when the value of the sinusoidal current i(t) decreases, the commutation frequency of the inverter transistors decreases compared to the case with linear inductance. When using nonlinear filter inductance, the mode of operation is near to the case of the fixed band hysteresis control [4], conserving best shape of the inverter current as in case of sine band hysteresis control.
REFERENCES
[1] Rashid, M.H. (2001) Power Electronics Handbook, Academic Press. [2] L. Rossetto, G. Spiazzi, P. Tenti, "Control techniques for power factor correction converters", Proc. of Power Electronics, Motion Control (PEMC), September 1994, 13101318. [3] M. Raou, M. Lamchich, “Average Current Mode Control of a Voltage Source Inverter, Connected to the Grid: Application to Different Filter Cells”, Journal of Electrical Engineering, vol. 55, No. 34, 2004, 7782 [4] Ajay T and Paresh C.S, “Comparative analysis of fixed and sinusoidal band hysteresis current controllers for voltage source inverters”. IEEE Trans. On Ind. Electronics, VOL. 39, NO. 1, Feb1992. [5] Anchev M., G. Kunov,G. Staichev, E. Gadjeva, “Investigation of Step Up/Step Down AC/DC Converter with Improved Power Factor”, Intern. Comf. Electronics – ET’2002, September 2002, Sozopol, Bulgaria [6] PSpice User’s Guide, Cadence Design Systems, 2003.
506
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
Use one of your book credits to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.