You are on page 1of 8

FURTHER CORRUPTION

was a Senior 1989: Judy Attfield, along with Pat Kirkham, publishes A view from the interior: women & design. This house. 1989: Contributes with author John Albert Walker on his book Design history and the history of design. volume is a Lecturer in History and Design at the Winchester School of Art, at the University of a Senior 1989: Judy Attfield, along with Pat Kirkham, publishes A view from the interior: women & design. This house. 1989: Contributes Judy Attfield con 1989: Judy Attfield, along with Pat Kirkham, publishes A view from the interior: women & design. This house. 1989: Contributes Judy Attfield consumers, helped shape contemporary on material culture. design and the male designers’ view on women’s tastes and lives. 1989: Writes her Middlesex Polytechnic MA History of Design dissertation on Tufted carpets in the popular Southampton (UK). She was one of the pioneers of contemporary studies collection of essays that defines the material culture of everyday life is published. 1999: Utility 1989: Judy Attfield, along with Pat Kirkham, publishes A view from the interior: women & design. This house. 1989: Contributes Judy Attfield consumers, helped shape contemporary on material culture. design and the male designers’ view on women’s tastes and lives. 1989: Writes her Middlesex Polytechnic MA History of Design dissertation on Tufted carpets in the popular Southampton (UK). She was one of the pioneers of contemporary studies collection of essays that defines the material culture of everyday life is published. 1999: Utility sumers, helped shape contemporary on material culture. design and the male designers’ view on women’s tastes and lives. 1989: Writes her Middlesex Polytechnic MA History of Design dissertation on Tufted carpets in the popular Southampton (UK). She was one of the pioneers of contemporary studies

for it is focused on material addresses women’s contributions to modern design. 1989: Judy Attfield. 1994: Attfield organizes the conference Utility reassessed.collection of essays that defines the material culture of everyday life is published. how they. 2007: Bringin Attfield started her academic career in a discipline called Design history. which results in a publication of the same name in 1999. which was often devoted to idealize great designers and their feats. This house. Clarke. design and the male designers’ view on women’s tastes and lives. 1999: Utility 1989: Contributes ld dies. along with Pat Kirkham. This house. 1989: Writes her Middlesex Polytechnic MA History of Design dissertation on Tufted carpets in the popular Southampton (UK). as THE English AUTHOR . The book discussed in this paper. She was one of the pioneers of contemporary studies collection of essays that defines the material culture of everyday life is published. WILD Attfield introduces the volume as a contradictory. marks the author’s switch from a perspective that ignores people – other than g m PREAMBLE: THE AUTHOR’S PERSPECTIVE renowned designers – to one that explores design in everyday life. 1999: Utility 2006: Judy Attfie a Senior 1989: Judy Attfield. odernity home: writings on popular design and material culture is published. publishes A view from the interior: women & design. Wild Things. 1989: Contributes Judy Attfield consumers. publishes A view from the interior: women & design. helped shape contemporary on material culture. along with Pat Kirkham.furniture firm of J. This book is the central subject of this paper. hybrid work.

has been an independent field for a while. making. rather. using. on ‘how people make sense of the world through physical objects’. 2000: Wild things: furniture manufacture an its retailing 1939-1965 with initial reference to the reassessed: the role of ethics in the practice of design is published. the museum or art gallery to the factory 1980s. There have been. However. consuming. commonly addressing humanities and In generic terms. It is said material culture of everyday life’. 2000: Wild things: furniture manufacture an its retailing 1939-1965 with initial reference to the reassessed: the role of ethics in the practice of design is published. . this is a rather simplistic definition. attempts to integrate design as ‘commercial art’ and mass manufactured products in the ‘new art history’. rather. As the author puts it. once a sub-field of Art History. it can be said that ‘things’ are the units that make up the totality of the physical world. for it does not recognize crucial qualities that separate art from physical objects that serve a purpose. recycling and so on’. in the it from the display shel. discarding. but that approach fails to CULTURE PREAMBLE: THE AUTHOR’S PERSPECTIVE renowned designers – to one that 1992: Writes her University of Brighton utility’. distributing. on how an object works as a mediator between a person and the physical world. which is in its nature a cross-disciplinary subject. an outlook that comprises ‘the work of design. Design History. on ‘how people make sense of the world The author presents Material Culture as a young but well established field of study. that are ordinary ‘everyday’ things. on how an object works as a mediator between a person and the physical world. As the author puts it. This objects but not on things themselves.marks the author’s switch from a perspective that ignores people – other than g m PREAMBLE: THE AUTHOR’S PERSPECTIVE renowned designers – to one that marks the author’s switch from a perspective that ignores people – other than g m PREAMBLE: THE AUTHOR’S PERSPECTIVE renowned designers – to one that 1992: Writes her University of Brighton PhD thesis on The role of design in the relationship between and reassesses the concept of ‘utility’. the collection. This objects but not on things themselves.

Whereas art enchants the ord recognize crucial qualities that separate art from physical objects that serve a purpose. Making design a ‘thing’ reutrns it from the display shel. that are ordinary ‘everyday’ things. the museum or art gallery to the factory 1980s. Whereas art enchants the ordinary object and makes it special. attempts to integrate design as ‘commercial art’ and mass manufactured products in the ‘new art history’. but that approach fails to CULTURE PREAMBLE: THE AUTHOR’S PERSPECTIVE renowned designers – to one that 1992: Writes her University of Brighton PhD thesis on The role of design in the relationship between and reassesses the concept of ‘reutrns mpts to integrate design as ‘commercial art’ and mass manufactured products in the ‘new art history’. design ‘commercial art’ and mass manufactured products in the ‘new art history’. Making design a ‘thing’ reutrns it from the display shel. that are ordinary ‘everyday’ things. that are ordinary ‘everyday’ things. but that approach fails to CULTURE PREAMBLE: THE AUTHOR’S PERSPECTIVE renowned designers – to one that 1992: Writes her University of Brighton PhD thesis on The role of design in the relationship between and reassesses the concept of ‘reutrns inary object and makes it special. the collection. atte recognize crucial qualities that separate art from physical objects that serve a purpose. the collection. design disenchants it. the museum or art gallery to the factory 1980s. The author sets out recognize crucial qualities that separate art from physical objects that serve a purpose. attempts to integrate design as PREAMBLE: THE AUTHOR’S PERSPECTIVE renowned designers – to one that 1992: Writes her University of Brighton PhD thesis on The role of design in the relationship between and reassesses the concept of ‘reutrns sing the study on what people make of the items rather than the items themselves. design disenchants it. the collection. . Favoring recognize the various interpretations of the objects that result from cultural differences. the museum or art gallery to the factory 1980s. Making design a ‘thing’ reutrns it from the display shel. but that approach fails to CULTURE disenchants it. Whereas art enchants the ordinary object and makes it special.

a culture (…) bbbbbbb THINGS to overrate the role that mass manufactured objects are all the same.Whereas art enchants the ordinary object and makes it special. as it implies non-special and mundane qualities – hence focu for granted. an ‘object of everyday life’. but that changes once each of them is acquired by THINGS Judy different consumers. not as the totality of matter. Making design a ‘thing’ reutrns it from the display shel. a household. effectively making it a ‘thing’. the warehouse shelf or the forgotten corner at the back of a cupboard where it forms part of the physical effects belonging to an individual. The choice of the term ‘things’ was made in order not social floor. MATERIAL sciences. Through case studies ranging from reproduction furniture to fashion and textiles to 'clutter' . it culminates on what is dubbed ‘the of physical objects. the museum or art gallery to the factory 1980s. When associated to Design History. but that approach fails to CULTURE PREAMBLE: THE AUTHOR’S PERSPECTIVE renowned designers – to one that 1992: Writes her University of Brighton PhD thesis on The role of design in the relationship between and reassesses the concept of ‘reutrns to define ‘things’. the collection. attempts to integrate design as ‘commercial art’ and mass manufactured products in the ‘new art history’. a nation. but rather as material culture with human associations. design disenchants it. who will each have an unique relation to it.

attempts to integrate design as ‘commercial art’ and mass manufactured products in the ‘new art history’. the collection. design from physical objects that serve a PhD thesis on The role of design in the relationship between disenchants it. that are ordinary ‘everyday’ things. that are ordinary ‘everyday’ things. Whereas art enchants the ordinary object and makes it special. the museum or art gallery to the factory 1 recognize crucial qualities that separate art . Defining design as 'things with attitude' differentiates the highly enchants the or purpose. but that approach fails to CULTURE PREAMBLE: THE AUTHOR’S PERSPECTIVE renowned designers – to one that 1992: Writes her University of Brighton dinary object and makes it special.recognize crucial qualities that separate art from physical objects that serve a purpose. Making design a ‘thing’ reutrns it from the display shel. the museum or art gallery to the factory 1980s. Making design a ‘thing’ reutrns it from the display shel. design disenchants it. Whereas art 1992: Writes her University of Brighton PhD thesis on The role of design in the relationship between and reassesses the concept of ‘reutrns From others: What do things mean? What does the life of everyday objects after the check-out reveal about people and consumption is only the starting point in objects' 'lives'. the collection. Thereafter they are transformed and invested with new meanings that reflect and assert who we are.

1) in order to form an explanation of identity. We become innovators through a mediated process between the world and ourselves. with which each person struggles to uniquely modify in order to create an illusion of individualism. remains academically unchartered. ephemerality and self-identity. The act of. But beyond this. thus giving away our freedom of identity and individuality by subjecting ourselves to this rigorous control and policing this implies. Judy argues that “post-commodity phase refers to an object once it has been personalized and thus transformed to mediate certain social transactions related to identity. an embodiment of culture and consumer culture. she shows the materiality of the everyday in terms of space. Ubiquitous sociology investigation theorises consumption as a social activity. although these “things” are global can our identity be seen as anything other than globalized and impersonal? Surely we are merely contributing to capitalism and the fashioning of culture.145). the author traces the connection between objects and authenticity. By Judy Attfield. without actually asserting our independence like we are led to believe. we personalize them and adapt ourselves and the object to form our identity. For me it is not a book to agree with or disagree with. Attfield weds design history (which has tended to focus on "good design" as a way of raising standards in a consumerist society) with material culture (which takes a broader view of consumption and is less hierarchical in its judgments). Shortlisted for the Design History Society Scholarship Prize 2001-2002 “'Wild Things is an initial foray into a territory that. This book highlights key issues surrounding identity within a modernised culture consumed by consumerism and the need for objects to form our existence by objectifying the material world as a persuasive activity. it is“how people make sense of the world through physical objects” (pg. published 2000 by Berg. Nice introduction to contemporary historiography of design. . however we are merely adhering to the governing of societal confinements and consumer culture. time and the body and suggests a transition with the passing of time from embodiment to disembodiment.and reassesses the concept of ‘reutrns 980s. but that approach fails to CULTURE PREAMBLE: THE AUTHOR’S PERSPECTIVE renowned designers – to one that visible fashionable object from ordinary artefacts that are taken their material worlds? Has the quest for 'the real thing' become so important because the high tech world of total virtuality threatens to engulf us? This pioneering book bridges design theory and anthropology to offer a new and challenging way of understanding the changing meanings of contemporary human-object relations. she claims that once we have purchased the object or commodity.”(pg. There is an assumption that what we buy defines us and structures our identity. the book reflects the British context in which it was written. but a book to think with (and what more could you ask for?).'Journal of Design History” – “Wild Things: The Material Culture of Everyday Life”. These “things” by which we associate ourselves and identity have intrinsic meaning and value on capitalism and dynamics on the modern materialistic world. attempts to integrate design as ‘commercial art’ and mass manufactured products in the ‘new art history’. for all its ubiquity and ordinariness.