You are on page 1of 14

1.

The Indian Contract Act, 1872 extends to the whole of India except the State of Ans: Jammu & Kashmir Sec 1

2.

In this Act the following words and expressions are used in the following senses, unless a contrary intention appears from the context:(a) When one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing anything, with a view to obtaining the assent of that other to such act or abstinence, he is said to make a proposal: (b) When the person to whom the proposal is made signifies his assent thereto, the proposal is said to be accepted. A proposal, when accepted, becomes a promise: (c) The person making the proposal is called the " promisor and the person accepting the proposal is called the It promisee": (e) Every promise and every set of promises, forming the consideration for each other, is an agreement: (h) An agreement enforceable by law is a contract: Sec 2

3.

Who are competent to contract? Ans: Every person is competent to contract who is of the age of majority according to the law to which he is subject Sec 11

4.

Who cannot make a valid contract? Ans: (i) Minors (ii) persons in a state of unsound mind (iii) persons who are disqualified from contracting by any law to which they are subject Sec 11

5.

What is a sound mind for the purpose of contracting? Ans: A person is said to be of sound mind for the purpose of making a contract if, at the time when he makes it, he is capable of understanding it and of forming a rational judgment as to its effect upon his interests. Sec 12

6.

What is free consent under Indian Contract Act? Consent is said to be free when it is not caused by (1) coercion, as defined in section 15, or (2) undue influence, as defined in section 16, or (3) fraud, as defined in section 17, or (4) misrepresentation, as defined in section 18, or (5) mistake, subject to the provisions of sections 20, 21 and 22. Sec 14

7.

What is Undue influence under Indian Contract Act? Ans: A contract is said to be induced by "undue influence where the relations subsisting between the parties are such that one of the parties is in a position to dominate the will of the other and uses that position to obtain an unfair advantage over the other. Sec 16(1)

8.

Mr A is in a position to dominate Mr B, Aenters into a contract with B and the transaction appears to be unconscionable. Then the burden of proving that such contract was not induced by undue influence shall lie on Ans: Mr A Sec 16(3)

9.

Define fraud as per Indian Contract Act? Ans: Fraud means any of the following acts committed by a party to a contract with the intention of deceiving another party or to induce him to enter into the contract:(1) the suggestion, as a fact, of that which is not true, by one who does not believe it to be true ; (2) the active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact ; (3) a promise made without any intention of performing it (4) any other act fitted to deceive ; (5) any such act or omission as the law specially declares to be fraudulent. Sec 17

10.

An Agreement is a contract voidable at the option of the party whose consent to that agreement was caused by (i) Coercion (ii) Undue influence (iii) Fraud (iv) Misrepresentation (v) Ans: a) (i), (ii) & (iii) above b) (ii), (iii) & (iv) above c) all of the above d) (i), (ii) & (iv) above Sec 19 & 19A Mr A intending to deceive Mr B that one thousand kgs of sugar is made annually at s factory and induces B to buy the factory. The contract is voidable at the option of Ans: A or B Sec 19

11.

12.

X is entitled to succeed to an estate at the death of . Then Y dies and Z having received information of Ys death prevents the information reaching X and induces X to sell him his interest in the estate. This sale is voidable at the option of:Ans: a) X b) Ys legal heir c) Z Sec 19

13.

A, a money lender advances Rs 1000 to B an agriculturist and by undue influence induces B to execute a bond for Rs 2000 with interest at 5% per month. The court may set the bond aside, ordering B to repay Ans: a) Rs 1000 b) Rs 1000 with such interest a may seem just c) Rs 2000 with interest @ 5 % d)Rs 2000 without interest Sec 19 A

14.

Where both parties to an agreement are under a mistake as to a matter of fact essential to the agreement, the agreement is Ans; Void or Not void

15.

Sec 20 A agrees to buy a horse from B. But the horse was dead at the time of the bargain and both A and B were not aware of the fact. This agreement is Ans: Void or Not void Sec 20

16.

The consideration or object of an agreement is unlawful when i)it is forbidden ii)it would defeat the provision of any law iii)it is fraudulent iv)it involves or implies injury to the person or property of another or immoral Ans: a) (i), (ii), & (iii) above b) (i), (iii), & (iv) above c) (ii), (iii), & (iv) above d) (i) to (iv) above Sec 23 A promises to obtain an employment in public service and B promises to pay Rs 10000 to A. This agreement is Ans: Void or Not void Sec 23

17.

18.

18.A

Agreement in restraint of marriage void Every agreement in restraint of the marriage of any person, other than a minor, is void. Sec.26 Every agreement is restraint of the marriage of any person is void if the person is of age of a) 15 years b) 16 years c) 17 years d)18 years Sec 26

19.

Agreement are void if the meaning is i)certain ii) not certain

20.

Sec 29 A agrees to sell B one thousand litres of oil. There is nothing to show what kind of oil will be sold Ans: The agreement is void for uncertainty

21.

Sec 29 An agreement to subscribe or contribute, made or entered with for any plate, prize or sum of money of the value of Rupees__________ and above to be awarded to the winner of a horse race shall not be deemed to render unlawful Ans: 1000 Sec 30

22.

What is a contingent contract under Indian Contract Act? Ans: It is a contract to do or not to do something, if some event, collateral to such contract, does or does not happen Sec31

23.

Example for a contingent contract? Ans: A contracts to pay B Rs. 10,000 if B's house is burnt. This is a contingent contract Sec 31

24.

Which of the following statement is incorrect. (a) Contingent contracts to do or not to do anything if an uncertain future event happens become void if the event becomes impossible (b)Contingent contract to do or not to do anything if a specified uncertain event happen within a fixed time, become void if such event has not happened within such fixed time or such event becomes impossible before such fixed time. (c)Contingent agreements to do or not to do anything if an impossible event happens are void whether the impossibility of the event is known or not to the parties to the agreement at the time of making it (d) None of the above Sec 32,35&36

25.

Which of the following agreements is not void? a) P promises to pay Q a sum of money if a certain ship return within a year. This ship was burnt within a year b) M promises to pay N a sum of money if a certain ship does not return within a year. The ship was burnt within a year. c) X agrees to apy Y Rs 10000 if two straight lines should enclose a space d)A agrees to pay B Rs 5000 if B will marry As daughter C. C was dead at the time of agreement Sec 35 and 36 Where, by the contract, a promisor is to perform his promise without application by the promisee, and no time for performance is specified, the engagement must be performed within a) a month b) two months c) reasonable time d)any time Sec 46 Note: Reasonable time is in particular case, a question of fact. When promise is to be performed on a certain day, and the promisor has undertaken to perform it without application by the promisee, the promisor may perform it at the place at which the promise ought to be performed and a) at any time during the usual hours of business on such day b) at any time during such day c) on the next day d) none of the above Sec 47

26.

27.

28.

What is a reasonable time? Ans: It is in each particular case, a question of fact. Explanation to Sec 46 promises to deliver goods at Bs warehouse on first December. On that day brings the goods to Bs warehouse, but after the usual hour for closing it and hence the goods were not received at the warehouse. State whether A has Ans: (i) performed his promise (ii) not performed his promise

29.

30.

Sec 47 When a promise is to be performed on a certain day and the promisor has not undertaken to perform it without application by the promise, it is the duty of the promise to apply for performance (i)at a proper place (ii) within the usual hours of business Ans: a) (i) above only b) (ii) above only c) both (i) and (ii) above d) neither (i) nor (ii) above Sec 48

31.

The performance of any promise may be made in any manner or at any time prescribed or sanctioned by Ans: a) the promisor b) the promisee c) both promisor and promisee d)neither promisor nor promise Sec 50

32.

n agreement to do act impossible in itself is (a) Void (b)not void Sec 56

33.

In which of the following circumstances the contract becomes void a) agrees with Bto discover treasure by magic b) & Bcontracts to marry each other. Before the time fixed for the marriage, goes mad c) contracts to act at a theatre for 6 months in consideration of a lumpsum paid in advance by B. on several occasions is too ill to act d) All of the above Sec 56 Alternative promise: In the case of an alternative promise when one alternative is legal and the other illegal, then the legal alternative alone can be enforced. e.g X and Y agree that A shall pay Rs 10000 to B, for which B shall afterwards deliver to A, either rice or smuggled opium. Here it is a valid contract to deliver rice and a void agreement as to the opium. Sec 58 Responsibility of finder of goods.-A person who finds goods belonging to another, and takes them into his custody, is subject to the same responsibility as a bailee. i.e.he is bound to take as much care of the goods as a man of ordinary prudence would take care of his own goods. Sec 71 r/w 151 A person to whom money had been paid or anything delivered, by mistake or under coercion must repay or return it. e.g. A&B jointly owes Rs 1000 to C. A alone pays the amount to C and B without knowing that fact paid Rs 1000 to C. Now C is bound to repay the amount to B Sec 72 Compensation for the loss or damage caused by breach of contract is payable by the party who has broken the contract to the party who suffers from such breach Sec 73 Such compensation is not payable for any remote and indirect loss or damage sustained by the reason of the breach Sec 73

34.

35.

36.

37.

38.

39.

Illustration of Sec 73 (a) A contracts to sell and deliver 50 maunds of saltpetre to B, at a certain price to be paid on delivery. A breaks his promise. B is entitled to receive from A, by way of compensation, the sum, if any, by which the contract price falls short of the price for which B might have obtained 50 maunds of saltpetre of like quality at the time when the saltpetre ought to have been delivered. (b) A contracts to buy B's ship for 60,000 rupees, but breaks his promise. A must pay to B, by way of compensation, the excess, if any, of the contract price over the price which B can obtain for the ship at the time of the breach of promise. (c) A contracts to repair B's house in a certain manner, and receives payment in advance. A repairs the house, but not according to contract. B is entitled to recover from A the cost of making the repairs conform to the contract. (d) A contracts to supply B with a certain quantity of iron at a fixed price, being a higher price than that for which A could procure and deliver the iron. B wrongfully refuses to receive the iron. B must pay to A, by way of compensation, the difference between the contract price of the iron and the sum for which A could have obtained and delivered it. When a penalty is stipulated in a contract for breach of the contract, then the person complaining of such breach is entitled to receive from the party who has broken the contract, reasonable compensation not exceeding the penalty stipulated for. Sec 74 Illustrations for Sec 74 (a) A contracts with B to pay B Rs. 1,000, if he fails to pay B Rs. 500 on a given day. A fails to pay B Rs. 500 on that day. B is entitled to recover from A such compensation, not exceeding Rs. 1,000, as the Court considers reasonable. b) A undertakes to repay B a loan of Rs. 1,000 by five equal monthly instalments, with a stipulation that" in default of payment of any instalment, the whole shall become due. This stipulation is not by way of penalty, and the contract may be enforced according to its terms. Contract of indemnity A contract by which one party promises to save the other from loss caused to him by the conduct of the promisor himself, or by the conduct of any other person, is called a " contract of indemnity". Sec 124

40.

41.

42.

43.

Illustration for contract of indemnity A contracts to indemnify B against the consequences of any proceedings which C may take against B in respect of a certain sum. This is a contract of indemnity.

44.

Contract of guarantee A "contract of guarantee " is a contract to perform the promise, or discharge the liability, of a third person in case of his default. The person who gives the guarantee is called the " surety"; the person in respect of whose default the guarantee is given is called the " principal debtor ", and the person to whom the guarantee is given is called the " creditor ". Sec 126 A guarantee may also be oral Ans: *(i) correct (ii) incorrect Sec 126

45.

46.

Consideration for guarantee. Anything done, or any promise made, for the benefit of the principal debtor, may be a sufficient consideration to the surety for giving the guarantee. Sec 127 Illustration for Consideration for guarantee. (a) B requests A to sell and deliver to him goods on credit. A agrees to do so, provided C will guarantee the payment of the price of the goods. C promises to guarantee the payment in consideration of A's promise to deliver the goods. This is a sufficient consideration for C's promise. (b) A sells and delivers goods to B. C afterwards requests A to forbear to sue B for the debt for a year, and promises that, if he does so, C will pay for them in default of payment by B. A agrees to forbear as requested. This is a sufficient consideration for C's promise. (c) A sells and delivers goods to B. C afterwards, without consideration, agrees to pay for them in default of B. The agreement is void. Surety's liability. The liability of the surety is coextensive with that of the principal debtor, unless it is otherwise provided by the contract. Sec 128 Illustration for Surety's liability. A guarantees to B the payment of a bill of exchange by C, the acceptor. The bill is dishonoured by C. A is liable not only for the amount of the bill but also for any interest and charges which may have become due on it. "Continuing guarantee". A guarantee which extends to a series of transactions is called a "continuing guarantee". Sec 129

47.

48.

49.

50.

51.

Illustration for Continuing Guarantee (a) A, in consideration that B will employ C in collecting the rent of B's zamindari, promises B to be responsible, to the amount of 5,000 rupees, for the due collection and payment by C of those rents. This is a continuing guarantee. (b) A guarantees payment to B of the price of five sacks of flour to be delivered by B to C and to be paid for in a month. B delivers five sacks to C. C pays for them. Afterwards B delivers four sacks to C, which C does not pay for. The guarantee given by A was not a continuing guarantee, and accordingly he is not liable for the four sacks. A continuing guarantee may be revoked (i) at any time by the surety by notice to the creditor or, (ii) in the event of death of the surety so far as regards to future transactions Sec 130 & 131 Creditor's forbearance to sue does not discharge surety.Mere forbearance on the part of the creditor to sue the principal debtor or to enforce any other remedy against him does not, in the absence of any provision in the guarantee to the contrary, discharge the surety. Sec 137 Illustration to Sec 137 B owes to C a debt guaranteed by A. The debt becomes payable. C does not sue B for a year after the debt has become payable. A is not discharged from his suretyship. Release of one co-surety does not discharge others. Where there are co-sureties, a release by the creditor of one of them does not discharge the others; neither does it free the surety so released from his responsibility to the other sureties. Sec 138 Circumstances in which the guarantee becomes invalid Any guarantee which has been obtained by means of misrepresentation made by the creditor (ii) Any guarantee which the creditor has obtained by means of keeping silence as to material circumstances (concealment) (iii) When a co-surety does not join in a guarantee which has a clause that the guarantee cannot be acted upon until the co-surety joins. Sec 142,143&144 Illustrations for Section 142 and 143 (a) A guarantees to C payment for iron to be supplied by him to B to the amount of 2,000 tons. B and C have privately agreed that B should pay five rupees per ton beyond the market price, such excess to be applied in liquidation of an old debt. This agreement is concealed from A. A is not liable as a surety. (b) A engages B as clerk to collect money for him. B fails to account for some of his receipts, and A in consequence calls upon him to furnish security for his duly accounting. C gives his guarantee for B's duly accounting. A does not acquaint C with B's previous conduct. B afterwards makes default. The guarantee is invalid. (i)

52.

53.

54.

55.

56.

57.

58.

Liability of co-sureties bound in different sums. Co-sureties who are bound in different sums are liable to pay equally as far as the limits of their respective obligations permit. Sec 147 Illustration for Section 147 (a)A, B and C, as sureties for D, enter into three several bonds, each in a different penalty, namely, A in the penalty of 10,000 rupees, B in that of 20,000 rupees, C in that of 40,000 rupees, conditioned for D's duly accounting to E. D makes default to the extent of 30,000 rupees. A, B and C are liable to pay 10,000 rupees each. (b)A, B and C, as sureties for D, enter into three several bonds, each in a different penalty, namely, A in the penalty of 10,000 rupees, B in that of 20,000 rupees, C in that of 40,000 rupees, conditioned for D's duly accounting to E. D makes default to the extent of 40,000 rupees. A is liable to pay 10,000 rupees, and B and C 15,000 rupees each. (c)A, B and C, as sureties for D, enter into three several bonds, each in a different penalty, namely, A in the penalty of 10,000 rupees, B in that of 20,000 rupees, C in that of 40,000 rupees,conditioned for D's duly accounting to E. D makes default to the extent of 70,000 rupees. A, B and C have to pay each the full penalty of his bond.

59.

60.

What is Bailment? A " bailment " is the delivery of goods by one person to another for some purpose, upon a contract that they shall, when the purpose is accomplished, be returned or otherwise disposed of according to the directions of the person delivering them. The person delivering the goods is called the "bailor". The person to whom they are delivered is called, the " bailee ". Sec 148

61. The person delivering the goods is called : Bailor The person whom the goods are delivered is called : Bailee 62. If there are faults in the goods bailed, the bailor is bound to disclose the same to the bailee if he (bailor) is aware of it, and if the faults would expose the bailee to extraordinary risks. If the bailor does not make such disclosure, heis reposible for any damage to bailee of such faults. (a) Correct (b) Incorrect Secc 150 63. If the goods are bailed for hire then the bailor is not responsible for such damage if he was not aware of the existence of such faults in the goods bailed. (a) Correct (b) Incorrect Sec 150

64.

65.

66.

(a)A lends a horse, which he knows to be vicious, to B. He does not disclose the fact that the horse is vicious. The horse runs away. B is thrown and injured. A is responsible to B for damage sustained. (b)A hires a carriage of B. The carriage is unsafe, though B is not aware of it, and A is injured. B is responsible to A for the injury. The bailee should take care of the goods bailed as if it was his own goods. The bailee is, however, not responsible for any loss, destruction or deterioration of the goods if he has taken care of it as if it were his own goods. This is, of course, subject to the absence of any special contract. Sec 151&152 If the bailee, with the consent of the bailor, mixes the goods of the bailor with his own goods, then who shall have an interest in the mixture produced. a) Bailor b) Bailee c) Both of them in proportion to their respective shares

67.

Sec 155 If the mixing is done by the bailee without the consent of the bailor, and if the goods can be separated or divided then who is bound to bear the expenses for the separation or division and for any damage arising from the mixture. a) Bailor b) Bailee c) Both of them in equal share

68.

69.

Sec 156 In the case of mixing of goods by the bailee without the consent of the bailor and if the goods cannot be separated or divided and delivered back, then the bailee is liable to compensate the bailor for the loss of the goods. Sec 157 Illustration for Sec 157 A bails a barrel of Cape flour worth Rs. 45 to B. B, without A's consent, mixes the flour with country flour of his own, worth only Rs. 25 a barrel. B must compensate A for the loss of his flour. After the purpose for which the goods were bailed has been accomplished, the bailee should return the goods on demand (a) Correct (b) Incorrect Sec 160

70.

71.

A gratuitous(given free of cost) bailment is terminated on the death of the (i) (ii) (a) (b) (c) (d) Bailor Bailee Item (i)above Item (ii) above Either (i) or (ii) above None of the above Sect 162

72.

Right of finder of goods; may sue for specific reward offered. The finder of goods has no right to sue the owner for compensation for trouble and expense voluntarily incurred by him to preserve the goods and to find out the owner; but he may retain the goods against the owner until he receives such compensation; and,where the owner has offered a specific reward for the return of goods lost, the finder may sue for such reward, and may retain the goods until he receives it. When a thing which is commonly the subject of sale is lost, if the owner cannot with reasonable diligence be found, or if he refuses, upon demand, to pay the lawful charges of the finder, the finder may sell it, when the lawful charges of the finder in respect of the things found amount to (i) (ii) (iii) 50% of its value 75% of its value Two third of its value

73.

74.

Sec 169 The bailment of goods as security for payment of a dept or performance of a promise is calledPledge The bailor in this case is called-Pawner The bailee in this case is called-Pawnee

75.

76.

Sec 172 Pawnee's right as to extraordinary expenses incurred. The pawnee is entitled to receive from the pawnor extraordinary expenses incurred by him for the preservation of the goods pledged. Sec 175 When the goods are pledged and the pawnor makes default in payment of the debt, or performance, at the stipulated time of the promise, the pawnee may either, the pawnee may bring a suit against the pawnor upon the debt or promise, and retain the goods pledge as a collateral security; or (ii) he may sell the thing pledged, on giving the pawnor reasonable notice of the sale. Sec 176 Definition of Agent and Principal An "agent" is a person employed to do any act for another or to represent another in dealings with third persons. Principal is a person for whom such act is done or for whom an agent represents. Sec 182 (i)

77.

78.

Condition for employment of an agent. An agent may be employed by a person who Any person who is of the age of majority according to the law to which he is subject (ii) Is of sound mind (both the above conditions are to be satisfied) Sec 183 (i)

79.

Who may be an agent? Any person who (i) Is of age of majority and (ii) Is of sound mind Sec 184

80.

No consideration is necessary to create an agency (i) (ii) Correct Incorrect Sec 185

81.

Agents authority may be (i) Expressed (ii) Implied (iii) a) (i) above only b) (ii) above only c) both (i) and (ii) d)neither (i) or (ii) above Sec 186 Definition of sub-agent? A " sub-agent " is a person employed by, and acting under the control of, the original agent in the business of the agency. Sec 191 Except in the case of fraud or wilful wrong, the sub-agent is responsible for his acts to the agent, but not to the principal. Sec 192 Termination of agency An agency is terminated in the following circumstances, (i) by the principal revoking his authority; or (ii) by the agent renouncing the business of the agency; or (iii) by the business of the agency being completed; or (iv) by either the principal or agent dying or (v) becoming of unsound mind; or (vi) by the principal being adjudicated an insolvent under the provisions of any Sec 201

82.

83.

84.

85.

Agent's accounts.-An agent is bound to render proper accounts to his principal on demand. Sec 213 Agent's duty to communicate with principal.-It is the duty of an agent, in cases of difficulty, to use all reasonable diligence in communicating with his principal, and in seeking to obtain his instructions. Sec 214 Agent not entitled to remuneration for business misconducted.- An agent who is guilty of misconduct in the business of the agency is not entitled to any remuneration in respect of that part of the business which he has misconducted. Sec 220

86.

87.

88.

Illustration of sec 220 A employs B to recover 1,000 rupees from C. Through B's misconduct the money is not recovered. B is entitled to no remuneration for his services, and must make good the loss. Compensation to agent for injury caused by principal's neglect.-The principal must make compensation to his agent in respect of injury caused to such agent by the principal's neglect or want of skill. Sec 225 Illustration of sec 225 A employs B as a bricklayer in building a house, and puts up the scaffolding himself. The scaffolding is unskilfully put up, and B is in consequence hurt. A must make compensation to B.

89.

90.