Constitutional Law 2 - Course Syllabus

INHERENT POWERS OF THE STATE

POLICE POWER
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21.

LTO v. City of Butuan, G. R. No. 131512, January 20, 2000 Romeo Gerochi v. DOE. G. R. No. 159796, July 17, 2007 Planters Products, Inc. v. FERTIPHIL Corp., G.R. No. 166006, March 14, 2008 Buck v. Bell, 274 U. S. 200 Ermita-Malate Hotel and Motel Operators v. City of Manila, July 31, 1967 White Light Corp. v. City of Manila, G.R. No. 122846, January 20, 2009 Taxicab Operators v. Board of Transportation, 119 SCRA 597 Republic v. Meralco, G.R. No. 141314, Nov. 15, 2002 Lim v. Pacquing, 240 SCRA 649 Ormoc Sugar Central v. City Treasurer, G.R. No. L-23794, Feb. 17, 1968 Lutz v. Araneta, 98 Phil. 148 Magtajas v. Pryce Properties, 234 SCRA 255 Miners Association v. Factoran, 240 SCRA 100 Pollution Adjudication Board v. CA, 195 SCRA 112 Tablarin v. Gutierrez, 152 SCRA 730 Tio v. Videogram Regulatory Board, 151 SCRA 208 Ynot v. IAC, 148 SCRA 659 Lozano v. Martinez, 146 SCRA 323 Bunting v. State of Oregon, 243 U. S. 426 MMDA v. Bel-Air Village Assn., March 27, 2000 Emilio Gancayco v. City Gov’t, G.R. No. 177807, October 11, 2011

EMINENT DOMAIN
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21.

Assn. of Small Landowners v. Sec. of Agrarian Reform, 175 SCRA 343 Roxas & Co. v. CA, 321 SCRA 106 Belen v. CA, 195 SCRA 59 Manosca v. CA, Jan. 29, 1996 De Knecht v. Bautista, 100 SCRA 660 Republic v. De Knecht, Feb. 12, 1990 EPZA v. Dulay, 148 SCRA 305 Phil. Press Institute v. Comelec, 244 SCRA 272 Republic v. PLDT, 26 SCRA 620 Republic v. Salem Investment, G.R. No. 137569, June 23, 2000 Republic v. CA, G.R. No. 146587, July 2, 2002 City Government of Quezon City v. Ericta City of Manila v. Chinese Community, 40 Phil. 349 Heirs of Ardona v. Reyes, 125 SCRA 220 Iron and Steel Authority v. CA, Oct. 25, 1995 SMI Development Corp. v. Republic, 323 SCRA 862 Estate of Salud Jimenez v. PEZA, 349 SCRA 240 Land Bank v. CA, July 10, 1996 Napocor v. Angas, 208 SCRA 542 Napocor v. Gutierrez, 193 SCRA 1 TELEBAP v. Comelec, April 21, 1998

3. Jan.S. Feb. Mijano. 3. Ormoc City. 2003 CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS 1. Sison v.R.R. 2002 Joseph Estrada v. July 23. Aug. Parrish. 148 SCRA 659 People v. 3. S. Al. 101 Phil. 2000 Ormoc Sugar Central v. Secretary of Justice v. Commission on Human Rights. 347 U. 331 8. CIR.R. GR 139465. 4. S. 130 SCRA 654 Lladoc v. 148560. 1. 2. Louis Biraogo v. G. 4. of Public Works. 2. 19. Lantion. 45 Nebbia v.S. 17. Pascual v. 3 Brown v. Thompson. S. Truth Commission of 2010. 149110. 1155 De Guzman v.S. City of Cabanatuan. 5. 1 Shapiro v. 1999 Plessy v. S. 265 Civil Rights Cases. 4. 2000 Secretary of Justice v. 192935. 2001 Dumlao v Comelec. 4. 185 SCRA 523 Ang Tibay v. Dec. 9.R. S. 309 SCRA 87 7. S. 438 U. 618 Eleazar Qinto. 298 SCRA 83 Chavez v. 379 Ynot v. 2. 109 U. 227 SCRA 703 Ichong v Hernandez. G. 2. 3. Bakke. Cayat. 1998 Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Lantion. 129118.R. No. Jan. 96 SCRA 392 Griswold v. Sharpe. S. G. 2. 319 Roe v. 2009 w/ all dissenting opinions. 635 Palko v. Dec. 1. 14 SCRA 292 Philex Mining v. 483. No. 350 SCRA 163 EQUAL PROTECTION 1. Wade. 1. 113 West Coast Hotel Co. 5.S. 4. 479 Lochner v. State of Connecticut. New York.S. 294 Bolling v. Simon v. Sandiganbayan. Ancheta. 24. 163 U. et. IAC. 1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.R. 2. 1994 DUE PROCESS 1. Dec. Board of Education of Topeka. 2000 People v. 17. 388 U. 300 U. 1. of the United States v.C. Oct. PCGG. 110 Phil. S. 148571. 5. 1998 6. G. S. 324 SCRA 689. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. No. April 9. Ferguson. Phil. NPC v. 22. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. 69 Phil. New York. 5. 347 U. Connecticut. 2000 (Reconsideration) Govt. Nov. Dames. Prado. 18. v. 3.POWER OF TAXATION 1. Virginia. 410 U. 349 U. Philippine Judges Assn. v. 2010 w/ dissenting opinions . No. G. 537 Regents of the University of California v. 1968 People v. 5. 2. 3. 189698. S. 5. Dela Piedra. 394 U. 68 Phil. 291 U. 5. Jalosjos. 381 U. 2010 1. Feb. 4. v. Sec. G. 502 Non v. Comelec. Feb. 7. 3. July 19. 4. 497 Loving v. 198 U. COMELEC. 302 U. 5. 28. Sept. 12 People v. Johnson & Sons. CA. Purganan. 3.

Andan. 194 SCRA 292 Mapp v. De Villa. Domagas. 436 People v. 5. June 29. Purganan. 2. Enage. 5. 2000 People v. 167 SCRA 394 Abdula v. 23. 2000 RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED 1.SEARCH AND SEIZURE 2. 2. 1. Comelec. 5. 353 SCRA 307 People v. 3. 5. July 11. Defensor-Santiago. Arizona. 331 U. Lising. 133 SCRA 800 Columbia Pictures v. May 5. De Villa. 326 SCRA 1 People v. 2006 Soliven v. People. 4. 3. CA. 1. 1 MIRANDA RIGHTS 1. 2002 Tucay v. 179061. June 5. 5. Obrero. United States. 2. 392 U. 2000 People v. 1989 Guazon v. 2. 1. No. Comendador v. 137 SCRA 541 Go v. Miranda v. Guiani. David v. 352 SCRA 174 Allado v. Endino. 3. De Villa. Molina. 145 Harvey v. Makasiar. 1993 Corro v. July 13. 29. 367 U. Ohio. 28. 1967 Terry v. March 3. Felix. Aug. 242 SCRA 110 Maguddatu v. 384 U. GR 171396. Galit. De La Cruz. 181 SCRA 623 Harris v. 1995 People v. 5. Ohio. 162 SCRA 840 Katz v. May 3. Desierto. 4. Gamer.R. 4. 332 SCRA 190 People v. 29. 643 Stonehill v. 1991 Govt. 389 U. 2009 2. 329 SCRA 158 Magtoto v. 4.S. 1. G. 41 SCRA 3 Enrile v. United States. S. 1994 Aniag v. 4. Flores. 24. Matrido v. March 2. 200 SCRA 80 Dela Camara v. 347 Lim v. 135 SCRA 465 People v. 1. Diokno. CA. 186 SCRA 217 Paderanga v. Chief of Staff. Sept. Salazar. 240 SCRA 541 RIGHT TO BAIL 3. of the United States v. Manguera.S. Mahinay. 206 SCRA 138 Valmonte v. 3. 3. June 19. 63 SCRA 4 People v. S. 5. 302 SCRA 385 People v. 5. 2. 224 SCRA 506 People v. 3. CA. 237 SCRA 424 Burgos v. 2. Estrada v. Agustin. Base. Feb. 1997 Gutang v. 4. People. 2. 4. 3. 2001 . Diokno. 4. Macapagal-Arroyo (PP1017). Donato. Sheala P. Feb.S. Sept. 1.

Rule on the Writ of Habeas Data 1. 2. 11.3. 221 SCRA 560 United States v. Oct. 1995 Terry Lyn Magno v. Martos. 4. Director of Prisons. Sept. 2011 w/ dissenting opinion Rodolfo Noel Lozada v. 2011 Arthus Balao v. 67 L. Nov. 1998 Manantan v. 2. 5. 71 U. 1998 Dumlao v. Rosario Gopez Lim. 4. 3. 1993 People v. Sept. February 15. No. Salazar. 1994 Corpuz v. 186050. 3. 182161. Wainwright. Tampal.R. 377. Lanza. G. 194 SCRA 73 Cosep v. No. 3. et al. G. 3. 3. Robert Reyes v. 184379-80. 13. Holgado. CA. 2012 WRIT OF HABEAS DATA. 211 SCRA 805 People v. GR No. 141 SCRA 37 People v. Teehankee. 1996 People v. People. 4. 2008 Rev. 6. Raymond Manalo. Caunca v. 1. w/ dissenting opinions DOUBLE JEOPARDY 3. 2010 2. 1994 Gideon v. Ed. PGMA. 1. Fr.R. Dec. 82 Phil. Vergara. 5. 5. 1. 302 U. CA. GR No. 4. et al. 235 SCRA 152 Feria v. G. 212 SCRA 229 Ordonez v. Comelec. May 21. GR No. v. 180906. No. S. 2. 5. 95 SCRA 392 Guerrero v. 1. 25. 1995 Mapa v. Dec. 1. April 15. People. People. Roxas. CA. 23. July 24. April 24. 2010. State of Connecticut. GR No. 2009 In re: Noriel Rodriguez. Mapalao. 1. 148 SCRA 292 Cuison v. 4.. 21. GR No. People v. Esparas. Feb. 314 Palko v. In re Melissa C. 2009 Razon v. 3. 2. Dec. GR Nos. 5. 5.S. 14. 319 HABEAS CORPUS 3. 5. Sandiganbayan. 191805. 2010 . 176389. 350 SCRA 387 People v. 4. Aug. April 26. S. June 28. 2. CA. Sec’y of National Defense v. 2. 5. 122954. Relova. 7. 327 U. 182498. 372 U. 189155. 851 Ex parte Milligan. Dec. 3. 4. 355 SCRA 1 Comelec v. CA. 260 U. Quijada.R. 4. 86 Phil. 184769. GR No. 1 In re: Sumulong. CA. Raul Gonzalez. 1996 People v. 244 SCRA 202 People v. 7. Pineda. 229 SCRA 501 People v. 335 Antonio Lejano v. CA. 197 SCRA 79 People v. 1. 2000 WRIT OF AMPARO. Abadia v. 2 In re Yamashita. 1996 Almario v. Tagitis. Rule on the Writ of Amparo 5. 752 People v. Macaraeg. Oct. S. PGMA.S. 15. Oct. Dec. MERALCO. 2. CA.

20. Hon. 19. 1994 Villaflor v. Federico Olbes v. 1997 Echegaray v. 15. 1998 NON IMPRISONMENT FOR DEBT 3. 2. 3. 173 SCRA 90 People v. 1994 . 62 Social Justice Society v. S. Board of Medical Examiners. Jan. 2. GR No. 20. People v. CA. 303 PRIVACY OF COMMUNICATION 4. July 10. Missouri. Ferrer.SPEEDY DISPOSITION OF CASES 3. 1990 People v. Aug. People v. 3. 3. Exec. Lozano v. Capt. Alabama. 190710. 148 SCRA 382 Ramirez v. Jesus Lucas. 2011 RIGHT AGAINST INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE 2.S. 1999 Calder v. Martinez. Pompeya. Panga. Abadia v. 173319. 157870. 48 SCRA 382 Wright v. Feb. Tranca. GR No. 1. Sandiganbayan.. In re Kay Villegas Kami. Echegaray. 3. 28. Lovett. October 26. 3 Dallas 386 Cummings v. 3. 2. 145 SCRA 112 In re: Wenceslao Laureta. 2008 People v. 55 L. 5. Gaanan v. Ed. GR No. 31 Phil. Wifredo Roquero v. 4. Feb. 1969 People v. 1994 Lacson v. UP Chancellor. 2009 5. CA. Dacuycuy. CA. Umanito. Jan. CA. 4. CA. 146 SCRA 323 4. IAC. Bull. Sept. 207 SCRA 726 EX POST FACTO LAWS AND BILL OF ATTAINDER 5. June 6. 219 U. 1. 2. Dangerous Drugs Board. 5. 191 3. 181851. 30. 1999 People v. 1. Secretary of Justice. Inc. 277 United States v. Esparas. 5. 4. 172607. 219. GR No. Secretary. Bailey v. US v. Pascual v. 1. GR No. 2010 RIGHT AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION. 1995 Zulueta v. March 9. 245 CRUEL AND INHUMAN PUNISHMENT 4. Nitafan. Danilo Buemio. 117472. 236 SCRA 676 4.R. Dec. 4. Nov. 1996 Salcedo-Ortanez v. 328 U. 2. Summers. Aug. Rule on DNA Evidence 1. May 26. Aug. GR 132601. 71 U. 128 SCRA 383 Misolas v. 2007 Jesse Lucas v. G. Jan. 5. 17. 1. 7. 41 Phil. S. 35 SCRA 429 Bayot v.

S. Comelec. 1998 Marquez v. 5. GR No. 4. 113 White Light Corp v. 36 SCRA National Press Club v. No. 2006 ABS-CBN v. 1998 Resolution Re: Live TV & Radio Coverage of Cory Aquino Libel Case. 505 U. 146 SCRA 44 Valmonte v. 2. April 29. 14. 1995. Comelec. 147571. 3. 13. Oct. 4. PRESS. Comelec. 5.M. G.S. 697 Brandenburg v.V. Tuvera. State of Minnesota. June 27. Jan. 5. 2. 5. Ct. S. Ople v. 2001 Adiong v. 207 SCRA 1 Sanidad v. Ermita (CPR).A. Sullivan.S.R. CA. 135882. 29. 2009 People v. 4. 2. 249 U. 168338. 122846.S.S. 28. 1. No. G. 15. v. 2007 Bartnicki v. 713 Near v. Schenck v. 444 R. 164369. 3. GR No. v. Aquino-Sarmiento v. Comelec. 9. Puno. 395 U. St. Comelec. PDI. June 29. California. Consoliza Laguardia. Oct. 476 Ashcroft v. CA. 4. 410 U. 71 SCRA 14 Tanada v. Feb.R. 169838. 2001 Griswold v. 20. May 5. July 23. Estrada. dissenting In Re: Petition to Annul En Banc Resolution A. 2. 16443. 413 U. 15 May 2009 Guingguing v. Ma. Connecticut. 181 SCRA 529 Borjal v. 3. Vopper. American Civil Liberties Union. Duque. Apr. 1. G. 2349. April 20. 98-7-02-SC. 301 SCRA 1. 1.S. 5. Jan. 2001 New York Times Co. United States. 2009 . v..R. Desierto. 4.Ct. Wade. 2002 Elesio Soriano v. Rule on the Writ of Habeas Data ACCESS TO PUBLIC INFORMATION 5. Civil Liberties Union. 5 Roth v. Paul. Dimaano. 3. Belmonte. May 13. ASSEMBLY & PETITION) 4. United States. GR No. 2. GR No. 117 S. 283 U. 30 Sept 2005 OBSCENITY CASES 2.S. 1991 In Re: Request for TV-Radio Coverage of Estrada Trial. Ohio. 207 SCRA 712 Mutuc v. 203 SCRA 515 Baldoza v. GR No. 1999 In re: Emiliano P. 354 U. 479 Roe v. No. v. 4. 255 New York Times Co. 1.S. 1. City of Manila. Jurado. Gonzales. 47 Bayan v. 22. GR No. 3. 1. 1. 381 U. 523 US 514 (2001) Villanueva v. Torres. 6. 3. 5. United States. 403 U. 164785. No. Comelec. 133486. Sept. 1989 FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION (SPEECH. 1997 Miller v. Morato. 02 April 2009 WRIT OF HABEAS DATA. 376 U. 3.R. 1. 5. 117 S. Jan.S. 2008 Philippine Pharmaceutical Assoc. June 26.RIGHT TO PRIVACY 4. 2. Reno v. 377 Chavez v. Feb. 128959. G. 2000 SWS v.

Caunca v. Perpetual Help College of Rizal. S. 1993 Aglipay v. 3. 290 U. Inc. S. Archbishop of Manila. 153888. Drilon. Dames II. July 26. 177 SCRA 668 Philippine Association of Service Exporters v. 1. 1. Conference of Maritime Manning Agencies v. CA. 64 Phil. 2003 RIGHT TO TRAVEL 5. 2. 3. 420 Iglesia ni Cristo. Nov. 21. CA. PSBA. 8. Apr. 300 U. 417 Garces v. 163 SCRA 386 Rubi v. 59 SCRA 54 CONTRACT CLAUSE 3. Manglapus. Gerona v. 4. 2 Ebralinag v. 1. Secretary of Labor. May 2. 4. 84 SCRA 554 Occeña v. 4. 1991 Villavicencio v. 17. 4. 106 Phil. 48 SCRA 382 SSS Employees Association v. 185 SCRA 523 University of San Agustin v. March 7. 1989 Yolanda Mercado v AMA Computer College. April 13. 142 SCRA 149 Marcos v. Ferrer. 18. 2010 . 2. May 27. 2. GR No. Alcuaz v. April 8. POEA. 1. 3. 1. 94 SCRA 533 Presley v. 201 Centeno v. Oct. ASSOCIATIONS OR SOCIETIES 2. GR No.FREEDOM OF RELIGION 2. 660 Silverio v. 379 ACADEMIC FREEDOM 4. 1993 Isabelo v. v. 201 SCRA 13 West Coast Hotel Co. 569 Fonacier v. 1994 University of San Carlos v. Teleron. 183572. 5. 39 Phil. 3. 1. 398 Lozano v. 1995 Home Building & Loan Association v. Elizalde Rope Workers Union. 5. 5. Capulong. 1988 UP v. 104 SCRA 510 German v. Provincial Board of Mindoro. Estenzo. Feati Bank. 3. CA. 96 Phil. Bel-Air Village Association. 4. 1996 Pamil v. Cayat. Comelec. 2. Parrish. 3. 2. 236 SCRA 197 Cox v. 5. Blaisdell. 4. 68 Phil. CA. CENECO v. 1. 127 SCRA 404 People v. 851 Manotoc v. Salazar. 82 Phil. 1993 Non v. Barangan. 5. New Hampshire. 1. 5. Martinez. 5. 2. CA. 1988 Ateneo De Manila v. 3. 312 U. 51 Phil. Ayson. CA. CA. Office of the Executive Sec’y. 135 SCRA 514 Gonzales v. Lukban. 86 SCRA 413 People v. Ruiz. 12 Islamic Da’wah Council v. 146 SCRA 323 Ortigas v. Secretary of Education. March 1.S. 175 SCRA 686 Victoriano v. 201 SCRA 584 In re: Edillon. 778 RIGHT TO FORM UNIONS. Division Superintendent of Schools of Cebu. Villalon. July 9. 39 Phil. v. Aug. 4.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful