BA Hons Dance Performance 2009-10

Assessment feedback Collaborative PracticesDevised Performance- Body Project Student: Eleni Agate Comments (1st Marker) Mariza Vinieratou 1. Evidence of intelligent engagement with the learning experience provided: Excellent Very Good Good Concern

2. Evidence of the ability to synthesise ideas and information, ordering existing knowledge and/or developing new knowledge: Excellent Very Good Good Concern

3. Evidence of the ability to assess the status of and strategies behind processual work: Excellent Very Good Good Concern

4. Evidence of knowledge of key issues in current practice and address them in your discussion/reflection. Excellent Very Good Good Concern

5. Evidence of the ability to formulate a critical framework to enable a reflection on your emergent methods of practice including the ability to document, analyse and reflect on practice (including student’s own practice), with reference to formative influences, critical and evaluative strategies and working processes Excellent Very Good Good Concern

6. Evidence of your role as artist/researcher at work, demonstrating rigorous attention to stages of experimentation in the process Excellent Very Good Good Concern

Additional comments: The presentation was very well structured; it allowed us to see clearly how the project related to the main concern as expressed in Lefebvre’s text, as well as her idea of “the self and the mirror”. The work she did, taking under consideration the space, was very skillful. Eleni now needs to work more on the application of different concepts in her work in the studio. It seems that Eleni has potential but she needs to be more focused in the future and try harder in order to link the concepts to practice. Suggested mark (first marker); Signed: Date: 10th November 2010 60

VERY GOOD. Evidence of the ability to assess the status of and strategies behind processual work: GOOD 4. strong communication skills and a good technical background. Suggested Mark: 60 Signed: Date: 10th November 2010 MODERATED RESULTS First Marker: Suggested mark (second marker) _________ Agreed Mark (if applicable) _________ ________ ____________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ____________________ (signature of first marker) (signature of second marker) (date finalised) (date finalised) . There is room for improvement though regarding the integration of existing knowledge into her work and the further exploration of various notions. concepts and strategies. Evidence of knowledge of key issues in current practice and address them in your discussion/reflection: GOOD 5. ordering existing knowledge and/or developing new knowledge: VERY GOOD 3. with fluency in movement. Evidence of the ability to formulate a critical framework to enable a reflection on your emergent methods of practice including the ability to document. CONCERN next to each criteria 1. critical and evaluative strategies and working processes: GOOD 6. imaginative. Evidence of the ability to synthesise ideas and information. Evidence of your role as artist/researcher at work.2nd Marker FOR MODERATION/ NOT FOR STUDENTS Name of 2nd Marker: Dimitris Tsioukas Student: Eleni Agate Please rate as EXCELLENT. analyse and reflect on practice (including student’s own practice). demonstrating rigorous attention to stages of experimentation in the process: GOOD Further comments: Inventive. Evidence of intelligent engagement with the learning experience provided: VERY GOOD 2. with reference to formative influences. GOOD.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful

Master Your Semester with Scribd & The New York Times

Special offer for students: Only $4.99/month.

Master Your Semester with a Special Offer from Scribd & The New York Times

Cancel anytime.