1.

Complete the following information about the plan being reviewed:

Name of Unit: - Ultimate Summer Concert

Essentials or Teaching Thinking? - Teaching Thinking
Reviewed by: - 35
2. Unit plan author has changed the name of the template to the name of the unit, uses a consistent size and
style of font throughout the document, and has created a visually appealing document.

Reviewer made some minor cosmetic edits.

nice formatting of the plan, it was easy to read and clean.
3. Section to review: UNIT OVERVIEW

Clearly stated (1) Not clear (2) Missing from plan (3) N/A (0)
Unit Title X
Unit Summary X
Subject Area X
Grade Level X
Approximate Time Needed X
Recommendation/comment: I’m a little concerned that the time you allotted may not be enough.
4. Unit Foundation Habits of Learning Taxonomy

yes - are included and match the project well

5. Unit Foundation - Part 1 (Subject Area Content) Targeted Content Standards and Benchmarks

missing from does not

yes no
plan apply
CONTENT AREA clearly stated (Science? Library/Media? etc.) X
CONTENT AREA standards are grade-appropriate for the intended
X
audience
Targeted CONTENT AREA standards clearly were used as the basis for the
X
project
The amount of targeted CONTENT AREA standards seems appropriate for
X
the length of the project
TECHNOLOGY standards are grade-appropriate for the intended audience X
TECHNOLOGY clearly enhances the project X
The amount of TECHNOLOGY included seems appropriate for the length of
X
the project
At least one OBJECTIVE is included for each targeted content area and
X
technology standard in the plan.
Each OBJECTIVE has a "matching" standard. X
The amount of OBJECTIVES/learning outcomes seems appropriate for the
X
length of the project.
Other (please specify): This plan did not have any CSOs listed nor where they are student objectives listed. There is
information there, which looks appropiate, however there are no reference numbers to allow me to know which
content standard is which, or what objective is being worked on.
6. Unit Foundation - Part 4 Curriculum-Framing Questions Refer to page 3.07 (Thinking with Technology) or
page 2.05 (Essentials) of your manual to review Curriculum-Framing Questions. Are the CFQ in this unit plan
good examples as defined in the curriculum?

GOOD EXAMPLES AS DEFINED BY THE

INCLUDED IN THE PLAN/CLEARLY STATED
COURSE
Essential
yes ? Your EQ should evoke a little “deeper” thinking.
Questions
Unit Questions yes yes
Content Questions yes Yes
7. Are the following included in the Assessment Plan?

not does not author has included an

yes missing
clear apply example
An ASSESSMENT TIMELINE X
Methods and resources to use at the BEGINNING of the
X
unit before project work begins
Methods and resources to use DURING the project X
Methods and resources to use at the END of the unit X
Comments/suggestions:
8. Which of the following tools is included in this plan? (check all that apply)

Visual Ranking Tool

Seeing Reason Tool
Showing Evidence Tool
9. Section 5 - Unit Details Are the following sections complete and clearly written?

yes present, but not clear missing from plan does not apply
Prerequisite Skills X
Instructional Procedures X
Accommodations for Differentiated Instruction X
Materials and Resources Required for Unit X
10. Final comments, recommendations, concerns about this plan go here:

Minor revisions needed – overall, good job!

I really like the copyright awarness handout, and the cheat sheets, they are always so benifical. I don’t know if you
were able to include those into your plan. You should definitely include the link if they are online. other resouces, as
the Fair Assoiciation Chairperson, fantastic addition. Chances are it will be a person the student's know, giving the
lesson revelence, and knowing that people actually do this.