11-1447 Summary

https://ecf.cadc.uscourts.gov/cmecf/servlet/TransportRoom?serv...

If you view the

Full Docket

you will be charged for 4 Pages $0.40

General Docket United States Court of Appeals for District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals Docket #: 11-1447 Jose Lacson v. Dept. of Homeland Security, et al Appeal From: DHS Homeland Security Fee Status: Fee Paid Case Type Information: 1) Petition for Review 2) Review 3) Originating Court Information: District: DHS-1 : DHS-AT-0752-11-0765-I-1 Date Filed: 09/20/2011 Docketed: 11/17/2011 Termed: 07/23/2013

1 of 2

7/23/13 8:04 PM

11-1447 Summary

https://ecf.cadc.uscourts.gov/cmecf/servlet/TransportRoom?serv...

01/08/2013

PER CURIAM ORDER filed [1414021] allocating oral argument time as follows: Petitioner -- 15 Minutes, Respondents -- 15 Minutes. One counsel per side to argue; directing party to file Form 72 notice of arguing attorney due 01/10/2013 [11-1447] FORM 72 submitted by arguing attorney, Edward Himmelfarb, on behalf of Respondents TSA and DHS. [11-1447] (Himmelfarb, Edward) FORM 72 submitted by arguing attorney, Lawrence Berger, on behalf of Petitioner Jose Lacson. [11-1447] (Berger, Lawrence) The following entry was entered in error, please disregard: ORAL ARGUMENT HELD before Judges Garland, Brown and Williams. [11-1447] ORAL ARGUMENT HELD before Judges Garland, Brown and Williams. [11-1447] LETTER FILED [1415997] by TSA and DHS pursuant to FRAP 28j advising of additional authorities [Service Date: 01/17/2013 ] [11-1447] (Himmelfarb, Edward) PER CURIAM JUDGMENT filed [1447988] that the SSI order be affirmed with respect to three posts, but be set aside with respect to the fourth post for the reasons in the accompanying opinion . Before Judges: Garland, Brown and Williams. [11-1447] (UNDER SEAL - PENDING SSI REVIEW) OPINION filed [1447990] (Pages: 18) for the Court by Judge Garland, [11-1447] PER CURIAM ORDER filed [1447992] Because the record in this case contains SSI material, the opinion filed July 23, 2013, is being issued under seal. The Court does not believe, however, that the opinion itself contains SSI material. It is, on the court’s own motion, ORDERED that by 2:00 p.m. on July 30, 2013, respondents show cause why this opinion should not be unsealed. The response to this order must specify which passages, if any, should be redacted as SSI material, and must specifically state the cause for each such redaction. If appropriate, the response should be filed under seal. Respondents shall be prepared to support any redaction requests with live testimony before the court by a Department of Homeland Security official, if the court subsequently so orders. [1447990-4]. Before Judges: Garland, Brown and Williams. [11-1447] CLERK'S ORDER filed [1447993] withholding issuance of the mandate. [11-1447]

01/08/2013 01/10/2013 01/17/2013 01/17/2013 01/17/2013 07/23/2013

07/23/2013 07/23/2013

07/23/2013

PACER Service Center
Transaction Receipt DC Circuit (USCA) - 07/23/2013 20:53:11 PACER Login: Description: Billable Pages: rj2009 Case Summary 1 Client Code: Search Criteria: Cost: 11-1447 0.10

2 of 2

7/23/13 8:04 PM

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful