INTRODUCTION – INFLECTIONAL MORPHOLOGY The present course will deal with the traditional parts of speech, in particular with

the grammatical categories/inflectional categories traditionally associated with the major parts of speech such as tense, aspect, mood, for the verb (number, gender, case, determination for nouns, pronouns etc, comparison for adjectives and adverbs). Language as an object of study has been approached from different perspectives: traditional (descriptive; meant to observe and enumerate aspects of language); structuralist (descriptive; an attempt to reflect the systematic character of language); generative (language is a body of rules by means of which all the sentences can be obtained). The structure of language can be analyzed in terms of levels of representation. For any utterance there are: - a phonological level – strings of phonemes - a morphological level – morphemes and words - a syntactic level – phrases and sentences - a semantic level – semantic concepts: events, objects, states, processes “Morphology” is a term based on the Greek words morphe (=form/structure) and logie (=account/study). In fact, the term can apply to any domain of human activity that studies the structure or form of something. In linguistics, morphology is the sub-discipline that accounts for the internal structure of words. There are two types of complexity of word-structure: one is due to the presence of inflections and another due to the presences of derivational elements. Both operations add extra elements to what is known as the base. Derivation refers to word formation processes such as affixation, compounding and conversion. Derivational processes typically induce a change in the lexical category of the item they operate on and even introduce new meanings (-er adds the meaning of agent/instrument). Inflection encompasses the grammatical categories/markers for number, gender, case, person, tense, aspect, mood and comparison. It is defined as “a change in the form of a word to express its relation to other words in the sentence”. Inflectional operations do not change the category they operate on ( goes or grammars are just variants of one and the same word go and grammar). Actually, they are formal markers that help us delimit the lexical category of a word, i.e. the parts of speech. In this respect, lexical items (words) that are distributionally similar (i.e. have the same distributional properties) form classes. (Traditionalists: parts of speech, structuralists: form/morpheme classes; generativists: lexical categories). All these terms are intended to designate elements from the same pool – N, V, A, Adv, P etc. – but the different terms are associated with the theoretical frames in which they were used and, hence, with methods of doing lg. research specific for that theoretical framework.

-

Inflectional affixes have the following characteristics: They produce closure upon words (can no longer attach a derivational element to them) Inflected forms are organized in paradigms, i.e. they are in complementary distribution; for instance, nouns occurs in pairs hat – hats, book – books. The elements of a paradigm may evince the phenomenon of suppletion – one of the forms is not phonologically related to the other: went for go, better for good. A paradigm can be defective – lacks a form: can - *cans, trousers - *trouser. Inflections are formal markers (semantically they are empty, abstract); they help us delimit the lexical category of the word to which they attach. In other words, each lexical category (major part of speech) is characterized by specific inflectional markers. Case, number, gender, and determination characterize nouns. Tense, aspect, mood, number and person characterize verbs. Person, number and –in some cases – gender characterize pronouns. Adjectives and adverbs are characterized by comparison. Although all of them lack descriptive content, they pass on the descriptive content of the category they depend on.

Traditional approaches: The basic unit of analysis was the word. Words operated as signs, i.e. as instruments for the description and understanding of reality. They were classified into parts of speech and set into paradigms of declension and conjugation. Traditional theories described words in terms of the traditional list of Aristotelian categories. Aristotle assumed that the physical world consisted of things (substances), which had certain properties (called accidents). Transferred to morphology, the substance of a word (its meaning) had to be distinguished from its accidents, i.e. the different forms it assumed in linguistic context. Thus, certain accidental categories were considered to be typical for particular parts of speech: nouns (inflected for case, number, gender; verbs for tense, number, person, mood, aspect). Hence, what are traditionally referred to as grammatical categories correspond to the accidental categories, and this explains the older term ‘accidence’ for what is also known as inflectional variation. The Aristotelian opposition matter vs. form also helped grammarians distinguish between major and minor parts of speech. Only major parts of speech (nouns, adjectives, verbs and adverbs) were meaningful. The other parts of speech (conjunctions, prepositions, pronouns, determiners, quantifiers, etc.) known as minor parts of speech did not signify anything of themselves but merely contributed to the total meaning of sentences by imposing upon them a certain form or organization. Thus, in delimiting parts of speech, traditionalist grammars, called ‘notional’, employed three criteria: meaning, inflectional variation and syntactic function. Meaning was basic and it was correlated with the other two criteria. The last two criteria are based on formal properties, so they define parts of speech in terms of their distribution. Notional definitions were incorrect in that they were circular – a term was explained by resorting to the same term. For instance, the noun was defined as the name of a living being or lifeless thing. But ‘virtue’ is neither a lifeless being, nor a living being, the only reason for saying that ‘virtue’ is a thing is that the word that refers to it is a noun. Structuralist approaches: It is a formal approach. Language was regarded as a system of relations, the elements of which had no validity independently of the relations of equivalence and contrast that held between them (syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations). It excluded meaning from its analysis and was based only on the distribution of the items analyzed. In structuralism, the lexical items (the traditional major parts of speech) and the grammatical items (typically the minor parts of speech and inflectional affixes) are distinguished in terms of paradigmatic oppositions and fall into two classes: open vs. closed classes of items. Open classes (nouns, adjectives, verbs and adverbs) have large numbers of items and new members can be added by coining or borrowing. Closed classes (conjunctions, prepositions, determiners, pronouns, etc. and inflectional affixes) include terms that have no descriptive content, having a fixed/limited number of items. Generative approaches: They are similar to the structuralists approaches in the sense that the lexical/grammatical categories can be defined only through their roles in the rules and principles of grammar. NB grammatical categories in generative approaches no longer refer to inflectional markers, but to syntactic categories (sentence, noun phrase, verb phrase etc.). Generative grammars operate with two types of categories: lexical and grammatical/syntactic categories. Lexical categories (N, V, A) coincide with the traditional parts of speech and the structuralist open classes, and grammatical categories (NP, VP, AP) correspond to phrases or syntagms – specific sequences of words. Each lexical category has a corresponding syntactic phrase - N → NP. In other words, syntactic phrases are projections of lexical categories. Then we translate the syntactic information in N → NP into functional information (i.e. the subcategorisation frame [_ NP] which is characteristic of a transitive verb is converted into functional information by stating that direct objects are characteristic of transitive verbs). According to this theoretical model, it is not lexical categories (N, V, A etc.) that correspond to semantic categories, but major syntactic categories (NP, VP, AP etc.) The syntactic categories are in a relation of correspondence with semantic categories such as events, processes, states, individual objects etc. We shall clarify this later on when we discuss number, aspect etc. As we shall see, events are represented by the syntactic category of verb phrase, e.g. read a novel, paint a picture. Objects will be represented by

the syntactic category of noun phrases: the chair, a chair, my chair, this chair etc. In other words, the ontological (semantic) categories are represented by major syntactic phrases, not by lexical categories. The lexical categories are defined in terms of features to be found in their lexical entries in the lexicon. These features include morpho-syntactic categories, i.e. inflections. Various parts of speech display certain categorical similarities, which can be represented in terms of shared features. The most important opposition for the parts of speech system is the opposition between verbal and nominal categories. Parts of speech are analyzed along the dimension [+/- V] or [+/- N]. The [+/- N] categories (A, N) are marked for gender, number and case, while the [+/- V] categories are not characterized by these features. Adjectives and adverbs share the inflectional/functional category of comparison. Another important opposition is between lexical categories and functional categories. This opposition is in part the same as the structural distinction between open classes (N, V, A etc.) and closed classes (Determiner, Inflection, Complementizer etc) of items. The open classes are defined as classes with descriptive/semantic content (N, V, A) containing indefinitely many items and which allow conscious coining, borrowing etc. On the other hand, functional categories include free morphemes: determiners, quantifiers, pronouns, auxiliary verbs, complementizers etc. and bound morphemes/inflectional affixes: inflections for tense, aspect, agreement/number. Hence the term ‘functional categories’ covers minor parts of speech and inflectional categories. They form a closed set of items which - never occur alone, - have a unique Complement and can’t be separated from it, - lack descriptive semantic content, - act as operators placing the Complement in time, in the world - are heads of lexical categories. Information expressed by inflection is not always dictated by syntactic structure. There are two types of inflection: - Inherent/morphological inflection (not required by the syntactic context): number with nouns and pronouns, person for pronouns, gender for nouns. - Contextual/syntactic (which follows from syntax): number and person in verbs, case in nouns. For instance: They are running in the field now. He is running home now. They – 3rd p.pl. – information contained in the lexical meaning of they. Hence, inherent. Are running vs. is running is contextual information provided by the context in which the verb is used and triggered by the presence of an agreement between the subject and the verb. Gender for nouns is inherent. E.g. queen. Case for nouns is contextual (triggered by the type of verb – double transitive as in ask somebody a question or a verb with dative and accusative as in lend money to someone). THE CATEGORY OF ASPECT Aspect – a notion of time, distinct from tense, which describes the internal temporal structure of events What Tense and Aspect have in common: both are functional categories delimiting the lexical category Verb, they are related morpho-syntactically (realized by verb inflections and auxiliaries) and semantically (both partake of the notion Time but in distinct ways). Where Tense and Aspect differ: Tense – represents the chronological order of events in time as perceived by the speaker at the moment of speaking; it locates the time of the event in the sentence relative to NOW Aspect – gives info about the contour of the event as viewed by the speaker at a given moment in time Traditional grammars: aspect is used for the perfective – imperfective opposition, referring to different ways of viewing the internal temporal constituency of a situation

The perfective – provides a holistic view upon the event, looking at the situation from outside The imperfective – is concerned with the internal phases of the situation, it looks at the situation from inside Current approaches: aspect covers two perspectives. It is still used to refer to the presentation of events through grammaticized viewpoints such as the perfective and the imperfective (viewpoint / grammatical aspect). In addition, the term also refers to the inherent temporal structuring of the situations themselves, internal event structure or Aktionsart (situation/eventuality-type aspect). Situation/eventuality type aspect refers to the classification of verbal expressions into states, activities, achievements, accomplishments and semelfactives (how we conceive of situations or states of affairs). Both viewpoint aspect and situation type aspect convey info about temporal factors such as the beginning, end and duration of a state of affairs/situation. However, we need to draw a clear line between them as situation types and viewpoint aspect are realized differently in the grammar of language, i.e. they differ in their linguistic expression: - viewpoint aspect (perfective vs imperfective) is signaled by a grammatical morpheme in English (be-ing); it is an overt category - situation type aspect is signaled by a constellation of lexical morphemes. Situation types are distinguished at the level of the verb constellation (i.e. the verb and its arguments (subjects and objects) and the sentence (adverbials)). Situation types lack explicit morphological markers. Situation type aspect exemplifies the notion of a covert category. Compare: She ate an apple. She was eating an apple. She walked to the park. She was walking to the park. The two components of the aspectual system of a language interact with each other in all languages, although across languages, aspectual systems vary considerably, especially the viewpoint subsystem. Situation types can be distinguished as covert categories in all languages. Since Aspect can be assumed to be defined as the interaction of the lexical meaning of the verb, the nature of its arguments (subjects and objects) and grammatical inflection, aspectual meaning holds for sentences rather than for individual verbs or verb phrases. Sentences present aspectual info about situation type and viewpoint. Although they co-occur, the two types of info are independent. Consider: Mary walked to school. (perfective – past tense, goal / natural endpoint) Mary was walking to school. (imperfective – be-ing, goal not reached) Mary walked in the park. (perfective, no goal; the event was simply terminated) Conclusion: Aspectual info is given by the linguistic forms of the sentences: situation type is signaled by the verb and its arguments, while viewpoint is signaled by a grammatical morpheme, usually part of the verb or verb phrase. The perfective viewpoint gives info about endpoints (beginning and end) while the imperfective gives info about internal or other stages or phases. The domain of aspect offers choices within a closed system to the speakers of a language. There is a small, fixed set of viewpoints and situation/eventuality types. One of each must be chosen whenever a sentence is framed. In other words, speakers’ choices in presenting actual situations are limited by conventional categorization, conventions of use and the constraints of truth. ASPECT - Conceptual features of the situations types There are three semantic features that help us distinguish among situation types: [+/- stative], [+/- telic] and [+/- durative]. They function as shorthand for the cluster of properties that distinguishes them.

the imperfective may focus on preliminary or iterated/repeated stages: She was jumping up and down. States are said to ‘hold’ whereas events occur.g. The goal may be intrinsic to the event.durative Durative Durative Durative Instantaneous Instantaneous +/. Events are doings. With instantaneous events.STATIVE] covers the distinction between ‘stasis’ and ‘motion’ and separates situation types into the classes of states and events (activities. The feature [+ telic] is not relevant for states because they are unbounded and have an abstract atemporal quality. as it is with accomplishments and achievements (e. (the verb has a direct object/internal argument. involving causation (which includes both agentive and non-agentive subjects). Duration is grammaticized overtly or covertly. the verb is intransitive/atelic) b) John pushed the cart for hours. consisting of undifferentiated moments. be tall.DURATIVE] distinguishes between situation types that take time (activities.TELIC] separates situation types into telic and atelic. In The rock fell to the ground. The imperfective viewpoint (be – ing) is also related to duration. belief and other mental states. happen. states. break). In English duration is explicitly indicated by adverbials (for phrases) and main verbs (keep. basic states separate into predicates that apply to individuals (kinds of objects or objects) or to stages of individuals. which lack an interval. desire. take place or culminate.B. N. dispositions. (preliminary stage from an achievement) States Activities Accomplishments Achievements Semelfactives STATES +/. etc).stative Stative Dynamic Dynamic Dynamic Dynamic +/. continue). but the subject is not an agent. Events consist of stages/phases rather than undifferentiated moments. States are characterized by the features [+ stative] and [+ durative]. as it is for activities and semelfactives. they are [+ dynamic] or [stative]. the endpoint is arbitrary. (telicity given by the particle ‘up’. basic states are: know the answer. there is a final point given by the expression ‘to the ground’. The existence of telicity does not necessarily imply the presence of an internal argument (a syntactic object) and conversely the existence of an internal argument does not imply telicity: a) John stood up in a second. States are the simplest of situation types. Basic-level states According to the type of referent they apply to.[+/. [+/. achievements and semelfactives). accomplishments. yet the situation is an activity) N. There are different types of states: basic-level states and derived stative predicates. they have a culmination point.telic Atelic Atelic Telic Telic Atelic States are stable situations. [+/. (repeated activity from a semelfactive) The plane was landing. Intuitively. which can be stopped or terminated at any time.B. English syntactically distinguishes between: . Typical. in this case constituting its natural endpoint. location. Telic situation types are directed towards a goal/outcome. accomplishments) and instantaneous events (achievements and semelfactives). want. In other cases. Telic events are not limited to events that are under the control of an agent. since imperfective focuses on the internal stages of durative situations. Thus. activity and change. that is. they predicate a quality or property of an individual (possession.

The progressive is acceptable with these predicates only if the subject denotes a moveable object. sleep. verbs of feeling (like. They may appear in the progressive.a) Individual level predicates: permanent. perch. Compare: I saw the city hall from my window. write letters. changing into individual level predicates. paint the fence (acc. enjoy. b) an atelic durative verb with a complement that is cumulative or uncountable. She was hungry at noon. walk in the park. with verb constellations of position and location (sit. if used in the simple present or past. although they involve no agency or change. run along the beach.) vs. The socks are lying on the bed. An activity does not have a goal or natural endpoint. read at a book (activ. be in the garden. and b) Stage level predicates: temporary states (be available. whereas usually the progressive is associated with an active interpretation. dynamic events. dream. (state) Suddenly. desire. Multiple events also include iterations.). but never ‘finish’. etc. lie. hence the ungrammaticality of the third sentence in which London does not qualify as a moveable object. an activity has an arbitrary endpoint. while ‘activity’ is associated with human agency. be drunk. such as achievements and semelfactives: cough for five minutes. the progressive has a stative interpretation (they denote temporary states). They are compatible with expressions of simple duration and punctuality: He was angry for an instant. (achievement) I like music. find pebbles on the beach all afternoon. play chess/the piano. durative. think about. non-temporary states (know. (habitual) He writes novels. which is why they simply ‘stop’ or ‘terminate’. I saw a star. repetitions of instantaneous events. sprawl. . (state) I liked him in a second. Derived statives a) generic sentences b) habitual sentences Events can be recategorized into states. (stage level predicate) London lies on the Thames. that is. These qualify as multiple-event processes: eat cherries.). (generic) My cat eats carrots. (achievement) ACTIVITIES (PROCESSES) The term ‘process’ is favored over ‘activity’ because. be angry). be tall. c) in English. etc. the jewels glittered). Processes are atelic. for instance using a particular preposition: read a book (acc. Its termination is merely cessation of activity. laugh. paint away at the fence (activ. there are other means of changing the telicity of a constellation. The verb constellations may consist of: a) an atelic verb and compatible complements (if any): push a cart. c) Individual / stage level predicates: with interval statives. which describe relatively stable. be widespread). (individual level predicate) *London is lying on the Thames. it rained for hours. understand). which are stative at the basic level of classification. which denote transitory properties and apply to stages of individuals. that is. Here. love) and some verbs of mental states (know.) vs. Perception verbs (see). They are semantically stative precisely because they denote properties that hold over individuals or patterns/generalizations over events rather than specific situations. non-transitory inherent properties that apply to individuals (objects or kinds). (habitual) N. “process” encompasses both activities associated with human subjects (external causation) ( he swam/slept/strolled in the park) and activities that are not cases of human agency (the ball rolled/moved. drink wine. Process sentences consist of verb constellations presenting a process situation. Tigers eat meat. stand). may also have an achievement interpretation in the context of adverbs like ‘suddenly’ or with completive adverbials.B. etc.

remember. etc. Verbs plus particle constructions also read as accomplishments: throw something away/down/up/aside/in. lose the watch. the change being the completion of the process: build a bridge. shelve the books. arrive. Achievements focus mainly on the change of state. simply leaving out or backgrounding the causing activity and causing factor. win the race. flap a wing. durative verbs and countable arguments: They drank a glass of beer and left. reach the top. hiccup. recognize. Also. etc. hit. poison your roommate ). find a penny. He sang himself hoarse. Accomplishments are conceptualized as durative events. Even if some achievements may be preceded by some preparatory activity (land. slam/bang the door. drink a glass of wine. durative verbs and certain prepositions: The boy ran out. single stage events that result in a change of state. nor resultant stages. Semelfactives do not have preliminary stages. An accomplishment is a causal structure of the type “e 1 causes e2) where e1 is the causing activity/process and e2 is the resulting (change of) state. When they occur with period adverbials and the progressive. reach the top. But remember that we can focus on the preliminary stage and turn the achievement into an activity if we employ the progressive: The plane landed. (achievement) The plane was landing. THE ASPECTUAL RECATEGORIZATION OF VERB PHRASES Predicates shift from their prototypical class due to various elements in the verb constellations: . consisting of a process and an outcome / change of state and having successive stages in which the process advances to its conclusion. John kicked the ball for five minutes and then left.ACCOMPLISHMENTS Accomplishments describe change-of-states prepared (brought about/caused) by some activity/process. miss the target. repair a car. knock. Stereotypic achievements are: die. instantaneous events: cough. The maid swept the floor clean. lexical causative verbs are accomplishments ( break a window. notice. accomplishment constructions consist of constellations that have: a) Atelic. resultative constructions (which lexicalize both the causing activity and the resulting state) qualify as accomplishments: The wind shaped the hills into cones. accomplishments are complex events because they have other event types as their components. iterated semelfactive events. kick the ball. win the race). recognize. discover. b) Atelic. leave. this instantaneous type does not conceptualize it. cool the soup. (activity) The predicates that do not presuppose a preparatory activity are known as ‘lucky achievements’: find. In a nutshell. d) Atelic verbs and resultative phrase: The alarm clock ticked the baby awake. c) Atelic. they are interpreted as derived durative processes/activities consisting of a series of repeated. SEMELFACTIVES Semelfactives are atelic. lose. Thus. die. remember. The predicates are reinterpreted as multiple-event activities: John was kicking the ball when I saw him. cook a pie. Thus. notice. durative verbs and directional complements: The kid walked to school. ACHIEVEMENTS Achievements are instantaneous.

Almost any verb can become part of a habitual sentence if used in the simple present. (activity) / Your behavior kills me. (accomplishment) She combed her hair for two minutes. designating a general characteristic of the subject: The wood is burning in the fireplace. (accomplishment) (4) Tense: Habitual sentences always designate states. cut. it becomes an accomplishment. (activity) He discovered a treasure in the backyard. (activity) Tom walked to the building in ten minutes. accomplishments and achievements recategorize into activities unfolding at a certain reference time. (activity) (2) Direct Object: If the direct object of an accomplishment or achievement is a bare plural noun phrase.B. The tourists have discovered a beautiful castle. it turns it into an activity. (activity) He plays chess (every day). He played chess for two hours. (state) Activity verb phrases such as rub. (activity) If the direct object of an accomplishment or an achievement is a mass noun. (accomplishment) Tom ate popcorn for an hour. (activity) / This burns like fire. Some verbs can have several readings even though the verb phrase does not undergo any change of the type illustrated above: Tom read a book for an hour. (achievement) Tourists discovered that beautiful castle for years. Tom walked for an hour. Tom ate his hamburger in three minutes. kill turn into states when used in the simple present form. Tom walked in the woods for an hour. (activity) The battalion was crossing the border for twenty minutes. it turns into an accomplishment. states. (accomplishment) Tom wrote essays for two hours. (state) (5) Progressive / Continuous Aspect: When used in the progressive aspect. scratch. (achievement) Tom has been discovering lice in his son's hair for three days. N. (state) He is killing a chicken for dinner. (accomplishment) ASPECTUAL CLASSES OF VERB PHRASES AND THE PROGRESSIVE ASPECT . burn. (activity) (3) Adverbials: If an activity is combined with an adverbial of extent. (activity) / Tom read a book in an hour. the achievement recategorizes into an activity. (activity) Tom walked two kilometers in half an hour. Tom wrote the essay in two hours. they become activities. (accomplishment) If an activity combines with a locative noun phrase. sometimes with a frequency adverbial. (activity) / She combed her hair in two minutes.(1) Subject: If the subject of an achievement is an indefinite plural noun phrase or a collective noun.

/ I'm thinking of giving up smoking. he slipped on a banana skin and broke a leg. / I was only imagining those ugly scenarios. The river is flooding. allow us to refer to only a temporally limited stage of the individual. Compare: I imagine she will agree to your proposal. / Meanwhile he was trying to find out who had robbed him. as. When used in the progressive. ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND ACHIEVEMENTS The internal structure of accomplishments and achievements presupposes a final goal. the man was already drowning. / As he was crossing the street. Hence. trust. tremble. hope. They refer to a manifestation of the individual. semelfactives: jump. They are said to designate a property of the subject that lasts throughout time. with or without adverbials expressing duration (all the time. Yet. / He was hoping against hope that there was still a chance of success. However. they acquire an activity reading. be young. they express temporally and spatially limited processes unfolding at a certain reference time. (process unfolding now) The second set of sentences describes temporary activities under the control of the individuals. etc. / While she was rehearsing for the show. (activity) STATE VERB PHRASES States are defined as having an abstract quality and an atemporal interpretation. The dog is jumping up and down. / You're being a total bastard. (activity) The man fell into the river and drowned.ACTIVITY VERB PHRASES Used in the continuous aspect. (achievement) When his son came running to help him. (general properties) He is being rude tonight. / She is taller than you. her maid was sewing her dress for the gala.). kick. tap. (1) to be + property-designating adjectives and nouns: If the adjective / noun designates a permanent property of an individual. When they occur in the progressive. Her lips were trembling. wonder. activity verb phrases designate processes unfolding at a certain reference time. think. there are certain state verb phrases that may appear in the continuous. The implication is that their behavior is deliberate and they can put an end to it if they want to. meanwhile. they do not normally combine with the progressive. the verb will never appear in the continuous (be tall. believe. etc. (accomplishment) They were building the house when the accident happened. imagine. nod.). They hope to win. etc. Compare: He is a teacher. all day / night long. knock. be old. which refers to situations of limited duration. all the while. in which case the use of the progressive is required. changing their meaning. I think he is wrong. When they appear in the continuous. pat. Sometimes they describe two simultaneous processes and are connected either by and or by subordinating conjunctions such as while. etc. outcome or result that is suspended when the respective verb phrases combine with the progressive aspect. They built their house in two years. etc. (2) mental cognition verb phrases: know. certain adjectives / nouns express properties that can be altered and thus. for some time. . describe a series of repeated processes rather than a single process: The boy was kicking the ball against the wall. slam / bang the door. not to a characteristic property of his.

/ The nurse is weighing the baby. like. the subject deliberately does the action of 'weighing' or 'measuring': The baby weighs six pounds. Everybody envied everybody in that room. they avoid the use of the continuous. weigh. hate. they do not occur in the progressive if they denote a general characteristic of a certain individual / object. they describe processes going on for a limited period of time. . consist. dislike. / *I'm hearing the wind blowing. which preserves the sequential character of our perception of the world. contain. Again. (6) locative verb phrases: sit. there is .a public estimate based on the periodicity of natural phenomena Accordingly. / He will be despising me heartily.Time is an epistemic notion as it mirrors our experience of the world. / The mistake is costing us dearly. I'm seeing the doctor next week. (I have made an appointment) (4) emotive verb phrases: love. the atemporal quality of the state verbs is replaced with the temporal quality of the process unfolding for a certain period of time. TENSE TIME VS TENSE (TIME IS REFLECTED BY TENSE) - Time is objective in the sense that it does not have absolute reality outside the form of our perception of the world.a personal subjective estimate of duration . smell. lie. etc. Time is segmented by two different procedures: . they express temporary properties. remain. it is not inherent to objects. See and hear even acquire new meanings when appearing in the continuous: The court is hearing the evidence tomorrow. miss. / Are you belonging to the local library? The castle costs a fortune. (5) other property designating verb phrases: belong. etc. etc. hear. / I can hear the wind blowing. / I'm smelling your perfume to see if I can guess what it is. Instead. . Even if they make reference to an act of perception unfolding at a specific moment like NOW. taste. that is. rest.Time has a linear representation.Time is durationally infinite and segmentable. they appear accompanied by the modal verb CAN: I hear the wind blowing. / He is standing near the pole. It they combine with the progressive. In this case the subject is attributed intention or purpose: You smell nice. / I was envying him his freedom at the time. (they are listening to and trying the case). The milk tastes sour. I despise bad behavior. stand. If used in the progressive.(3) physical cognition verb phrases: see. feel Also referred to as 'verbs of perception'. / He is tasting the soup to see if it's got enough salt. . Verbs like weigh or measure have a behavior similar to that of perception verbs. want. measure. Such verbs appear in the continuous if their subject represents a moveable object and describe temporary states: Her new house stands / (*is standing) at the corner of our street. The necklace belongs to me. we perceive it as unidirectional (forwards).

Tense inflections are strongly related to adverbials. Albert is playing tennis. at least.e. about predicate temporal interpretation. (then / future) This actually means that we associate with a sentence that is vague the temporal interpretation that requires the least additional information (sort of default reading). i. its periodic relation to the sun. adverb phrases and adverbial clauses and they specify RT together with tense inflections. sentences without time adverbials may be non-ambiguous due to the context. Events can be simultaneous with ST (at relation) or they can be sequential to it (before / after relations). A VP consists of both its lexical head V0 and the complement(s) it has selected. time measurement is subjected to public agreement and it is based on the periodicity of some observable natural phenomena (revolution of the earth round its axis. ST/NOW is a central point on the temporal axis of orientation according to which we interpret the ordering of events/states. the stars etc) TENSE: A DEICTIC CATEGORY Tense is generally defined as representing the chronological order of events in time as perceived by the speaker at the moment of speaking. we have to talk about sentence temporal interpretation or. tense inflection) and temporal adverbials. there are regular co-occurrences between tense inflections and time adverbials (there are adverbials that co-occur only with simple past or only with present perfect and there are others that co-occur with both). roughly speaking. The latter add meaning to a sentence and during the process they might even disambiguate it.e. TENSE: MORE THAN TENSE INFLECTIONS A common mistake in approaching the category of tense is the belief that tense inflections alone mirror time. TIME/TEMPORAL ADVERBIALS Time adverbials include adverbs. On the other hand. characteristic of society. the moment NOW is central in the sense that time past or time future represent DIRECTIONS whose ORIENTATION depends on ST. Tense is a functional category that expresses a temporal relation to the orientation point (ST) in the sense that it locates in time the situation talked about. Tense is a deictic category. we apply the relation of simultaneity wherever possible. We know that information about the selection of complements by a verb is part of the lexical entry of that verb in the lexicon and it represents more or less its descriptive content. speech time (ST).e.- a personal time: man’s endeavor to measure duration by using his emotions as an instrument (time is expanded or contracted) a public time. In fact they are not enough to express the temporal specification of a message. If we assume that. In addition to this. the moon. All accounts of tense make interpretation sensitive to tense. (now / tomorrow) Albert was playing tennis. the descriptive content of a verb is the idea of event. i. A proper interpretation of temporal forms presupposes an analysis of the relation between (i) (ii) tense specification of the V (i. . which acts as a time adverbial giving a certain temporal reading or due to the fact that people tend to maximise available information. INFL identifies the event of the VP in the sense that it places that particular event in time. It means that when discussing temporal interpretation. we cannot conceive of this event without taking into account the complements of the respective verb as well as those explicit lexical means of placing the event in time: time adverbials.

We distinguish between: (i) (ii) anchored time adverbials which are in an explicit relation to ST in the sense that their temporal interpretations are determined relative to ST (now. (acc. more specifically within the stated interval compatible with atelic sentences. all day long. which receives a marked interpretation. into process of the multiple-event type) 4. (atelic) (?) John wrote a / the report for two hours. (semelf. 3. I read a book for a few minutes. b. in a second. into state – habitual) 6. within two months. Jon played the sonata for two hours. (ach. (telic) *The train arrived late for two hours. 4. John crossed the border all afternoon. Susan was asleep for two hours. Such clashes are resolved by a shift in the value of the verb constellation. yesterday. This contextual interpretation is made possible by the process called coercion. Jerry wrote a report for two hours. into process – iterative: many times) 5. 3. Compare: *John went into the house all afternoon. for a while. since the war/Christmas. John knocked on the door for two hours. always. the train arrived late. Whenever telic events occur in the context of duration adverbials there is a clash between the aspectual properties of the situation type and the aspectual properties of the adverbials. all afternoon.Classification of time adverbials The relation between time adverbials and ST can be explicit or non-explicit. over the weekend. into state – habitual) The felicity of the aspectual reinterpretation is strongly dependent on linguistic context and knowledge of the world. completive adverbials. Duration adverbials: for three months/a day/a week. (?) Bill swam laps in an hour. they indicate the duration of the described event by specifying the length of time that is asserted to take contribute to the location of the event in time. Mary wrote a sonnet in five minutes. on Friday). they locate the situation at an interval during which the event is completed/culminates. . Aspectually. requiring compatibility with the situation type. Mary went to school in the morning. John noticed the painting in a second. Given that temporal adverbials also contribute to the aspectual interpretation of sentences we can establish a further classification that distinguishes among: duration adverbials. 1. Duration and completive adverbials also have an aspectual value (they are sensitive to the aspectual value of the situation). completive adverbials are telic compatible with telic situations and odd with atelics 1. For months. Completive adverbials: in 2 hours. (coercion into a process) 2. during the war. etc. permanently. all the time. locating / frame adverbials and frequency adverbials. tomorrow) unanchored adverbials which do not have an explicit relation to ST and which orient themselves to times other than the utterance time or to utterance time (in June. 2. 2. into activity) 3. (acc. (acc. a. for hours. at night. but odd with telic sentences compatible with states and processes (activities) 1. (atelic) Andrew swam for three hours. For years. through August. they have various interpretations.

d. at night. Generic sentences are true of some particular entities. geographical statements. referential adverbials: refer to a time established by clock or calendar: at six. in March. namely ‘kinds’. till. As far as its factual status is concerned. never. VALUES OF PRESENT TENSE SIMPLE 1. Present simple is associated with stative verbs and it is used in scientific language. “In/after an hour Bill swam laps”. last week. therefore. The possible telic reinterpretations are: “Bill swam his planned number of laps in an hour”. in the sense that the adverbials refer to an interval elapsed before the beginning of the situations and not an interval during which the situations occur. anaphoric adverbials: relate to a previously established time: until. daily. on Sunday. GENERIC VALUE – unmarked value Present Tense Simple used in generic sentences indicates the validity of a state at speech time without making reference to a particular situation or moment. “She knocked at the door in ten minutes” (after ten minutes). on Christmas.4. on Sundays. proper names and quantified NPs but in this case the locus of genericity is not in the NP but rather in the sentence itself. . it appears in so-called ‘characterizing’ sentences. (?) Mary believed in ghosts in an hour. often. today. this year. at lunchtime. already 3. once a week. Locating adverbials / Frame adverbials: they locate situations in time by relating them to other times or to other situations they refer to an interval of time within which the described situation is asserted t have taken place according to the time of orientation we can distinguish three classes: 1. Frequency adverbials: frequently. It ascribes a property to a subject. Generic sentences are timeless statements expressing general or universal truths. in 1987 PRESENT TENSE SIMPLE Present Tense Simple is associated with the present moment . two years later. they impose an ingressive interpretation to the sentences. august 19. whenever. The same interpretation as the latter occurs with achievements and semelfactives: “They reached the top in ten minutes” (after ten minutes). i. in three days. early. “At the end of an hour/after an hour Mary began to believe in ghosts”.e. sometimes. every week/month etc. before. definitions. monthly. in instructions or when specifying game rules etc. the present is between the past and the future. The present expresses both situations whose time of occurrence is known and situations whose time of occurrence is not known. They can also appear with indefinite NPs. deictic adverbials: oriented to the time of utterance (ST): now.the speech time . the future is the least factually determined time. two weeks ago 2. last Sunday. in the evening. these NPs get a generic interpretation only when occurring in characterizing sentences. in proverbs. they indicate the recurrent pattern of situations within the reference interval they express a series of events which as a whole make a state of the habitual type: We often/always went/go to the mountains in wintertime. definite singular NPs and mass nouns. tonight. If (3) and (4) can be understood at all. The past is considered to be factually determined since we know if an action took place or not in the past. tomorrow. c. On the contrary. Kind referring expressions are bare plurals.in the sense that it may refer either to a point in time identified with speech time (ST) or to an interval that includes the moment of speaking.

(unspecified interval) He eats a lot of vegetables in winter. We sentence you to prison for life. Events that are simultaneous with the moment of speaking may be expressed either by a simple present or a present continuous: He shuts the window. and then I add the mixture and spread it… Here comes the winner! In ‘Gone with the wind’ Scarlet writes a letter. often. declare. the use of the simple present is rather dramatic since it insists on the total completion of the event mentioned. However. HABITUAL VALUE – unmarked value Habitual sentences indicate that a situation is repeated with a certain frequency during an interval of time. more often than not they have less than complete temporal specification. but this simultaneity is rather subjective than objective. Goal! First I roll out the pastry. It is used in sports commentaries. they do not point to a specific moment in time and in this respect they resemble generic sentences. Blood is thicker than water. Popescu sends the ball into the net. the performative verb appears in the first person singular or plural and may be accompanied by hereby: I name this ship "Queen Mary". (unspecified frequency) He doesn't eat many vegetables. unlike generic sentences. Habitual sentences may be completely specified. whereas the continuous present represents a neutral description of an action going on at the moment of speaking. Seth and Minnie come forward as far as the lilac clump… He nudges Minnie with his elbow… (O’Neill. 2. Very often. twice a day. commentaries on pictures. / He is shutting the window. deny. (specified frequency and interval) They visit me every day. demonstrations. every two weeks). A performative act is felicitous on condition that the persons and the circumstances .marked The instantaneous simple present refers to an event that is assumed to be simultaneous with the moment of speaking. Yet. Since they do not focus on a particular situation but rather on its recurrence. usually. INSTANTANEOUS VALUE . I hereby pronounce you man and wife. habitual sentences refer to an individual or an object about which the respective property is true at speech time.Water boils at 100ºC. seldom) and specific (three times a week.such as accept. When having an instantaneous value. whenever. pronounce. never. war reports. and exclamations. Compare: They visit me every two days during holidays. The instantaneous present is also used in performative sentences that employ performative verbs verbs that themselves are part of the activity they report . books or movies and stage directions: Hagi takes the ball and passes it to Popescu. London stands on the Thames. Mourning Becomes Electra) It is true that in most cases the event does not occur exactly when it is mentioned. they include adverbs of frequency classified into general (ever. indicating both the frequency and the interval during which an event takes place. name. (no frequency and no interval) 3. In performative sentences the event reported and the act of speech are simultaneous simply because they are identical. However.

In the examples below the content of the adverbial clause is assumed to exist as a fact: I'll see what to do when I meet him.m. arrive in London at noon and set off for Glasgow in the evening. I will take my umbrella if it rains. However. FUTURE VALUE .marked The use of the Simple Present with a past value is best known as the historic present and represents a storyteller's license. the "historic present is pretty frequent in connected narrative: the speaker. In simple sentences it is accompanied by a temporal adverbial indicating the future: The plane leaves for New York at 5 p. in other words. Compare: I will talk to him when I see him. By the time you get there. I will be very unhappy if our team does not win. NB.marked The simple present may acquire a future value either in simple sentences or in subordinate adverbial clauses of time and condition introduced by after. As Jespersen (1931:17) remarked. whereas the event expressed in the latter is a fact that is taken as given. The simple present with this value often alternates with a time adverbial indicating the past: . (instantaneous reading because of the suggestion of instantaneous perception indicated by "Look") He scores goals. (time clause) I don't know when I will see him. We leave Bucharest on Monday morning. For this reason the simple present with this value represents the only marked way to express the future time in English. schedules. if. It refers to mostly official or collective future plans or arrangements that cannot be altered. tomorrow. unless etc. The use of the simple present with future value in adverbial clauses of time and condition has more than a syntactic explanation. or recalls. the show will have already begun.involved in it are appropriate for the invocation of the respective procedure (for instance. which provides an axis of orientation for the action predicted in the main clause. The use of the simple present signals the fact that the future event is bound to happen. (habitual interpretation because of the plural direct object) He scores a goal. as vividly as if it were now present before his eyes". 5. what he is recounting. It may relate to timetables. before. Students are inclined to think that they must use only the simple present after clauses introduced by when and if. There is a contrast of meaning between the main clause and the subordinate. being typical of an oral narrative style. as it were. (generic reading) Look. PAST VALUE . the swallows fly higher than the doves. the anticipated event is attributed the same degree of certainty that we normally assign to present or past events. The event referred to in the former is a prediction. it is only a priest that can marry you and this can happen only in a church). (instantaneous interpretation) 4. forgets all about time and imagines. (conditional clause) I don't know if it will rain.: The caravan sets off tomorrow morning. the rule applies only to those cases in which when and if introduce adverbial clauses of time and condition. (direct object clause) / I don't know this. itineraries etc. Both habitual and generic sentences may receive instantaneous readings under certain circumstances: Swallows fly higher than doves. (direct object clause) / I don't know this. as soon as. when.

which means that the moment NOW is excluded. In such cases. Ch. a distinction has to be made between the historic present described above and the present forms employed to narrate fictional. Pitt writes in the March issue that… (in the correspondence column of a journal) In both cases the simple present emphasizes the persistence in the present of the effect of a past communication. There are two basic elements of meaning involved in the common use of the simple past. Finally. The fact was she had made a private marriage… (Thackeray. Although so far all the uses of the simple present have involved real facts.Brahms finishes his first symphony. / Ex-president dies of heart attack. and if he uses the past. / I just talked to him on the phone a moment ago. LIX. in 1974. the simple present may also refer to imaginary situations. Brahms was the last great representative of German classicism. Compare: Brahms is the last great representative of German classicism. the simple present often alternates with a past tense. The difference between using the present and using the past simply involves the speaker's point of view: if he employs the present. At the same the historic present is employed when describing an artist and his work because this feels as if they were still alive. Virg. Though tell and hear in the examples above refer to the initiation of a message. / I bought this dictionary when I was in Lisbon. last summer. 614) PAST TENSE SIMPLE The simple past is used to locate a situation at some specified time in the past. Bush. (in a letter) Your correspondent Mr. in historical summaries and tables of dates: MPs back school reform.At that moment in comes a messenger from the Head Office. He was born in London in 1952 and spent his entire life there. the person uttering the sentence must have a definite time in mind suggested by means of specific time adverbs ( yesterday. its use reminding one of the dramatic quality of the instantaneous present. Stefanescu. imaginary events. then he sees the artist as a person who died at a certain moment in the past. His lordship had no sooner disappeared behind the trees of the forest. it is also present in photographic captions in newspapers. (photo caption) 1876 . the situation described by the simple past takes place before the present moment. 1988:261) However.). The simple past may appear alone if the speaker who has a specific time in mind can assume that his interlocutor can . However. Mr. that is. This fictional use makes reference to no real time. Second. (I. then he considers that the artist still survives through his work. the content of the event or state described being actually recollected at speech time. the simple present appears in newspaper headlines to announce recent events. etc. so that communication is still in force for the receiver. First. but to an imaginary present time. hear: Mary tells me that you are going to buy new furniture. giving the reader the impression that he is actually witnessing the events described. two days ago. say. the use of the present seems to transfer the verbal meaning from the initiating to the receiving end of the message. speakers do not need to locate a past event by means of a time adverb. learn. The historic present is also used after verbs of linguistic communication such as tell. telling me the boss wants to see me in a hurry. Gore shakes hands with Mr. but Lady Randolph begins to explain to her confidante the circumstances of her early life.

such a retrospective view. but he is less of a nitwit than he was. the interplanetary transit vehicle Zeno VII made a routine journey to the moon with twenty people on board. S.A. of course. in 1987. .Collected Stories) Moreover. DEICTIC VALUE The simple past can be used deictically with a deictic adverb of time of the type yesterday. the simple past can be used without a definite adverb of time if the utterance refers to a comparison between present and past conditions as in: Bucharest is no longer what it was / used to be. in this case. Finally.'In the Garden' . speaker A specifies the past moment and speaker B does not need to mention it in his turn. / He is a nitwit. He opened the garden door. last night. then set it down again and went out into the scullery. Another particular case in which a past simple is used without a definite adverb of time involves a combination with the present perfect.(…)' (Dylan Thomas . He picked up a chair. in the first two examples above the definiteness of the situation is confirmed by the definiteness of the participants involved (my message) or of the circumstances (Led Zeppelin did perform in Bucharest on a specific day which is officially known). "We are invited by this convention to look at future events as if from a vantage-point even further in the future. Leech (1971: 10). / B: Well. and a great moth flew into his face. The latter is used to introduce an unspecified event that takes place anterior to the moment of speaking in a period that began in the past and includes the moment NOW. / A: What did you do there? / B: I had lunch. etc. In the last example. Thus it becomes obvious that the definiteness of the event expressed by the simple past does not necessarily presuppose that the time in question be specified. It is the whole context created by the advancing of the story that supplies the order of the events. two years ago. / My friend left for Poland in July.understand this either by inferring the time from the larger context in which the situation occurs or by making use of the definiteness of the participants involved: Did you remember to give him my message? Did you see Led Zeppelin perform live in Bucharest? A: I couldn't find Mary at the party last night. VALUES OF PAST TENSE SIMPLE 1. In this case the location of the event in time is established in relation to the moment of speaking NOW: Haydn was born in 1732. whether the events narrated are real historical events or just fictional situations devised in novels. we use the simple past for narrative even when referring to future events as in science fiction. I couldn't find her either. Thus. the simple past is no longer accompanied by a time adverbial and the situations described by this tense are ordered by the laws governing the narrative mode rather than by information present in the sentences proper. only that it be specifiable. Once an anterior frame of reference is established for the discourse it is only natural to refer to the already introduced situation by means of a definite specifier. in the imagination. NARRATIVE VALUE Since it deals with past events the simple past is a natural choice for narratives.e. 2. i. '(…) She left him alone in the kitchen. Any narrative normally presupposes. Then he stepped out into the garden and faced the enemies. However. / I finished reading the book last night. the simple past: A: Where have you been? / B: To the restaurant." . In the year AD 2201.

she rose quickly and left the room. and would have implied that the former was not at all pleased with speaker B making a request. I went out with my friends.e. Other verbs often present in similar contexts are wonder and think. Compare: Brian runs a mile every day. Unlike a present form.i. 5. (habitual) I went to the mountains three times that year. I hoped you could give me a hand with the cleaning. Brian ran a mile every day during his childhood. Unlike simple present sentences in which the time adverbial specifies the event time . more polite. After I (had) finished dinner. HABITUAL VALUE When used with this value. which indicates anteriority: I (had) read twenty more pages before I went to bed. (non-habitual) My dog chased cats. which adds a further overtone of politeness: .3. which would have made a polite answer impossible. the temporal relation between two consecutive events can be overtly marked by means of conjunctions (preserving the simple past in both the main clause and the subordinate clause) or by the auxiliary HAVE. "Do you want me?" would have been rather imperative. The habitual interpretation can be rendered by the frequency adverbial whose determiner must be indefinite or by a plural indefinite object: I went to the mountains three times a year. As soon as she saw / had seen me. On the other hand. whereas a reversal of the order of the events in the second example is impossible basing our judgment on our knowledge about the way these activities can be performed. simple past sentences allow the presence of both a time adverbial indicating the frequency specification and a time adverbial that supplies the interval during which the recurring event took place. Similarly. allowing speaker A to either accept or decline the request. (sequential) In the first example the order of the events can be reversed without altering the meaning of the sentence. the simple past refers to events recurrent within a given past interval of time. suggesting that speakers A and B have similar social positions. (habitual) 4. the past form avoids a clash of wills. his choice of the respective verbal form renders the request indirect and thus. speaker A's question indicates politeness. The event of unlocking the door necessarily takes place before its opening and thus the simple past "unlocked" has past perfect value. PAST PERFECT VALUE This value is derived from a contrast between simultaneous past events and past events occurring in a sequence. in most cases they are used in combination with the continuous aspect. PRESENT TIME VALUE This represents a special development of the normal past meaning. (non-habitual) My dog chased my neighbor's cat / a cat. indicating the recurrence of the event. which appears in everyday conversation making reference to the present feelings or thoughts of the speaker: A: Did you want me? B: Yes. Although speaker B could have used the present instead of the past. He enjoyed and admired her paintings. (simultaneous) He unlocked and opened the door.

a feature the past simple lacks. thus. yesterday. so far. Compare “You woke him up when you went to the bathroom ten minutes ago. The castle has been empty for ages.e. ET of past simple events is definite: at two o’clock. which is prior and thus distinct from the moment NOW. rather. since the English perfect is quite often related to the meaning of completion or result. we understand that John’s reading the book in its entirety occurred at some unspecified time in the past. Thus. for two hours. it stems from the interaction of the perfect form with the aspectual meaning of the verb phrase. PRESENT PERFECT Past events can be predicated about either in the past tense or the present perfect from two different perspectives. There have been several theories that tried to capture this distinction between the past simple and the present perfect: (a) The Indefinite Past Theory – present perfect locates events somewhere before the moment of speaking. we can maintain the connection between the perfect and the perfective in view of the fact that what is 'summed up as a whole' (i. ET is indefinite and “specified” only by indefinite adverbials: since 3 o’clock. relevant to the present moment through its result: now. I thought I might drop by later tonight if you don't mind. In contrast. but the event is related and. perfective) may also be anterior to a certain moment in time.I wondered / was wondering if you could help me with the kids while I am away. plus the temporal adverbials it co-occurs with. (b) The Current Relevance Theory – it is only present perfect that claims relevance at the moment NOW. The present perfect serves to locate an event within a period of time that begins in the past and extends up to the present moment (and includes it). John knows what the book is about. In “John read the book last year”. without identifying any particular point or interval of time. Before embarking upon an analysis of the two tenses mentioned above. we should clarify the relationship between the English perfect and the perfective aspect. the perfect may acquire different senses according to the type of aspectual class 'have' combines with: 1) continuative perfect 2) experiential perfect 3) resultative perfect 4) 'hot news' perfect CONTINUATIVE PRESENT PERFECT When the present perfect combines with state verb phrases in sentences that contain a durative adverbial (for instance. the event of John’s reading the book in is entirety is specified/dated as occurring during last year. etc. In “John has already read the book”. just like the other meanings of the present perfect. Without renouncing the idea that the perfect marks anteriority. etc. in contrast. yet. What we need to understand is that the 'result / completion' meaning is not intrinsic to the perfect. the past tense specifies that an event occurred at a past time that is separated and distinct from the present. they express states extending over a period of time that lasts up to the present moment: I have lived in Paris since 1987. Have you known my uncle for a long time? . (c) The Extended Now Theory – speakers can psychologically ‘extend’ the present backwards by means of present perfect in English.” to “You’ve waken him up” – the present perfect itself in the second sentence locates the effects of the event at NOW. since / for phrases).

that the time when it takes place is not mentioned. Jones has played the organ in this church for fifteen years.e. RESULTATIVE PRESENT PERFECT ./ Ever since the house has been occupied the poltergeist have been acting up. without carrying any other information. When I have tried to join their club. before (now): I have never seen such a majestic cathedral before. ever. I have lived in Paris simply places the situation at some unspecified point in the past./ It has been snowing since noon. the speaker shifts from Present Perfect to Past Tense: e. in which case we refer to recent indefinite past situations. / A: Have you ever in your life seen anyone so entirely delightful? B: Only when I’ve looked in the mirror. I have followed her behavior every day since she got here. The news has been broadcast at ten o'clock for as long as I can remember. Modes of occurrence: a) continuous continuative: I have been sitting in all day.g. the perfect expresses a habit and thus has a recurrent continuative reading: Mrs. He’s been sleeping for two hours. such use is often accompanied by adverbials of time of the type never. I went to Hollyrood Palace. If the definite time when the experience occurred is mentioned. on and off) EXPERIENTIAL PRESENT PERFECT With process and event verbs phrases (accomplishments and achievements). b) limited experiential: Have you had a letter to type today?/ She has already had three proposals this morning. they have constantly turned me down. Have you ever been to the States? Have you visited the Dali exhibition? The temporal location of some events may be very close to the moment NOW. A: And did you visit many places while you were there? B: Yes. A: When did you go? B: Oh. in fact. last April. In I've had a good life or You've outstayed your welcome the adverbials of time are felt as implicit ('during my life' / 'so far' or 'for too long' in the case of 'outstay'). (i. I have. this iterative use closely resembles the continuative use of the perfect and. Used with process verb phrases and a frequency or a durative adverbial. the perfect may refer to some indefinite situation in the past. Since a habit is described as a state consisting of repeated events. always. A: Have you been to Edinburgh? B: Yes. At the same time. already.g.Generally. the adverbial of duration cannot be absent from the sentence or otherwise the construction acquires an indefinite past reading. By 'indefinite' we mean on the one hand. Such examples often contain adverbs like just. Continuative: also with event verbs if in the progressive: e. Therefore. we may subsume it in the previous class as a type of 'recurrent continuative' perfect. b) discontinuous continuative: He has been building the house for the last five years. that the number of occurrences is unspecified and on the other hand. that’s when I did. there are exceptions to this rule if the semantic content of the respective sentence suggests a period leading up to the present. Modes of occurrence: a) general experiential: He has never liked heavy metal. yet or recently: Has the postman called yet? / They have already had breakfast.

to introduce 'the latest' events.that of Discourse Topic (defined as 'the subject matter under discussion in a certain context'). Compare: . namely. the club announced that it would trade midfielder Ion Radu to second-division club Valcea for two tons of beef and pork. For generations. This last observation relates to another notion . there are contexts in which the perfect is obligatory. Sparta produced Greece's greatest warriors. in those sentences that are semantically based on the cause . when the events in the main clause and the subordinate temporally coincide. Bearing this in mind.effect relationship. There is a special use of the present perfect instead of the simple present in adverbial clauses of time referring to the future introduced by after. (Nepal still exists. In contrast. it implies that a transition comes to a final state valid at the present moment. Nepal has produced the world's greatest soldiers. In most cases the alternation of present simple and present perfect bears no significance. but even if it is not. let us compare the various uses of the present perfect with the simple past.The association of event verb phrases (accomplishments and achievements). PRESENT PERFECT AND SIMPLE PAST As already stated. but our knowledge of the world allows us to employ the appropriate tense. once. The common factor is the inclusion of the present in its analysis. Similarly. Consider the following examples of continuative. when the event in the subordinate occurs before the one in the main clause. with the perfect generates a resultative reading . (Sparta no longer exists. Discourse topics condition the use of the present perfect in the sense that only those covering a period of time that includes the moment of speaking can be expressed in sentences that employ present perfect. when. The temporal location of such situations is generally mentioned in the second sentence. The resultative meaning does not need the support of time adverbials: He has delivered the parcel. (She is still alive. we talk about Hannibal or Sparta in the past because we know they no longer exist. Last week.that is. March 1988) NB.) For generations. / He has recovered from his illness. that presuppose a climax or end point. thus. the simple past is still employed at this point in the discourse: The struggling Romanian soccer club Jiul Petrosani has experienced what may be one of the more humiliating moments in recent sports history. The period referred to is rather assumed than named. we use the present perfect: Come over and see us when our guests leave / have left. (Newsweek. / The plane has landed. whereas Nepal obviously has relevance for the present.) Hannibal brought / *has brought elephants across the Alps. especially in news reports. The presence of the perfect simply places emphasis on the order of the events: I shall leave when I finish / I have finished. the simple present is favored. On the other hand. which afterwards are described using the past tense. The simple past marks events assigned to a past that is concluded and completely separate from the present. (She is dead. What differentiates them is their relation to the present. etc. We say You will feel better after you have taken this pill if the pill conditions the well-being of the patient. the present perfect either involves a period of time lasting up to the present or has results persisting at the present moment.) She was poor all her life. 'HOT NEWS' PRESENT PERFECT The perfect is often used in newspapers and broadcasts. present perfect and simple past resemble in that both express anteriority to a given moment in time. In such cases the present perfect is said to have a future value.) The use of either the perfect or the past in the above sentences is to be interpreted pragmatically. until. experiential and habitual perfect: She has been poor all her life.

he came to ask me for money. the second only with the perfect and the last with both. Their alternation depends on the speaker's viewpoint. while in the second he concentrates on the present moment and is only interested in where they are at present. (the past event is introduced by the perfect) Did you walk the dog? (said between husband and wife who refer to a particular time when the dog is usually walked) Contexts as that supplied by the second example also emphasize a characteristic of the present perfect. adverbs. adverbial clauses) classify into definite (bearing the feature [+THEN]. while the British say Have you met him yet? or I did it just now vs. adverbial phrases.e. The present perfect is less used in American English. Since it specifies a definite moment in the past. especially when it appears with recent indefinite past value. Americans tend to say Did you meet him yet?. because the time indicated by them is considered to be already given.e. I didn't recognize him / *haven't recognized him when I saw him. How much did you pay for it? I paid 15 $. (definite time adverbial) I have already talked to him. But if the discussion (i. since. . Naturally. the speaker focuses on the moment when he misplaced his gloves. definite articles or personal pronouns): I have bought this bag in Cypress Street. this tense requires the use of a definite time adverbial which locates the respective event at a certain point in the past. perhaps trying to remember what he was doing at the time. a fact which can be evaluated entirely only on the basis of contextual factors" (Ioana Stefanescu. because such a topic would have relevance for the present moment. this is used to initiate conversations. English Morphology. neither of the two sentences is correct since Shakespeare is dead.Shakespeare has written impressive dramas. *Shakespeare has quarreled with every playwright in London. the past tense is expected in (subordinate) clauses of time introduced by when. The basic difference between present perfect and simple past stems from the contrast definite / indefinite. there are contexts in which the two tenses are interchangeable .that is. If there is no time adverbial. a clause introduced by when will trigger the use of a past tense in the main clause as well because the subordinate functions as a definite time adverbial: When did you last see him? I haven't seen him since we met at Jane's party. I've just received word that he isn't coming. vol. Compare: Where did I put my gloves? to Where have I put my gloves? In the first example. resulting in different meanings. The first class combines only with the past. the present perfect is appropriate in all those uses in which the event described has relevance for the discourse topic. The first sentence is appropriate if the discourse topic is 'great dramatists of the world' or 'impressive dramas in world literature'. etc. indefinite (which are [-THEN]) and those that have both features (that is. they are [+/. discourse topic) is about Shakespeare as a person and his activities. while.THEN]). II. when they describe recent events. In spite of the differences mentioned so far. TIME ADVERBIALS IN RELATION TO PRESENT PERFECT AND SIMPLE PAST Time adverbials (i. 1988). "at the pragmatic level. then 'definiteness' is retrieved by assumption of a particular time from the context or is justified by the preceding use of a past or perfect tense: We met yesterday. since it is only natural to start conversations indefinitely and then to carry on using definite linguistic expressions (be they the simple past. As already seen in the analysis of the simple past. In conclusion.

etc. They didn't speak to each other for three weeks.) behave in a similar way. on Monday.00 and got here at 12. But it may also be a substitute for then and thus occur with past tense: Now my ambition was fulfilled. ('as early as then') . the 'never' period. up to now. Never.00 p. for the present. but I've seen her this July suggests that it is still July when I utter the sentence. but if it is a numerical adverb that may contrast with twice or three times. for now.m.00. The third group of adverbials allows the use of both the perfect and the past. always combine with both tenses. (uttered at 6. He hasn't done much work lately. It is interesting to notice that. for phrases occur with both the perfect and the past.) I didn't read the paper this morning. etc. during these five years. must be restricted to a past temporal frame as in: I never liked bananas when I was a child where the time clause supplies the background. / I just saw your sister. I left home at 8. they cannot occur with the present perfect (yesterday. having no relation to the present and hence. On the other hand. lately. again depending on the context. Compare: I haven't read the paper this morning. Apart from them. ('as early as now') I was already fed up with that piece. Already. I saw him on Sunday morning. (uttered at 10. We have been very busy so far.m. there is the class of unanchored adverbs of the type in the evening. yet and before occur with the perfect if they mean 'as early / late as now' and with the past if interpreted as 'as early / late as then': I've already heard that piece. then. The difference lies in whether the event is viewed simply as a factor of experience obtaining at the moment of speech (with the present perfect) or within the context of the time at which it occurred (with past simple). I saw her this July implies that July is over. etc. The difference in use between just and just now is the following: just can take either past simple or present perfect: I have just seen your sister. which most likely occur with the simple past.phrases cannot be used with the simple past. soon. last night / Tuesday / week / month / year. Now is mainly associated with present tense: Now my ambition is/has been fulfilled. resulting in different interpretations. while just now is interpreted as a moment/second/minute ago and occurs only with the past tense: I saw your sister just now.) Today.The definite adverbials of time point to a specific moment in the past.00 a. when used with the past tense. as yet. still.). it may be used with both tenses: I was happy once in this house. a week / month / year ago. ever. so far. tonight and all phrases with this (this afternoon / month / year / Christmas / March. hitherto. Once appears with the simple past when it means 'on a certain occasion' or 'at one time'. I met him only once when I was in Spain. for instance. before now: I haven't been able to talk to him since I last saw him at the mall. though since . although they do not make specific reference to it: He went out ten minutes ago. but then they made up. after lunch. given the appropriate contexts: They haven't spoken to each other for three weeks. the following adverbials are associated only with the present perfect: since. next. at 5 o'clock. for the time being. I've seen the movie only once.

in which case it is said to have a pre-preterite value. unlike present perfect which combines only with [+/-then] and [-then] adverbials: They had been there since 5.PAST PERFECT Past perfect may appear with both [+then] and [-then] adverbials. In conclusion. he burned it. (experiential) In Indirect Speech. in which case past simple sets the scene and past perfect expresses what had happened before: That morning I was quite content. imperfect. As already exemplified in the sentences above. past perfect is optional: Yesterday I went to the market. past perfect describes a past event that takes place before another past event or past moment: They found out where she had buried the treasure. On the other hand. In this sense. By Friday they had already found a way to get rid of her. The show finished two minutes ago. she had already hidden it in a new place. I had finished washing the clothes and I’d gone to bed early. The past perfect can be substituted with the simple past. If the verb expresses a state. which acquires a past perfect meaning: When he came back from the States. again unlike present perfect. By the time they went to dig it up. She said the show had finished two minutes before. In Indirect Speech. perfect compus. after. (continuative) I had watched United lose twice that season. NB. However. THE PERFECT PROGRESSIVE FORMS . Mai mult ca perfect: always past perfect Past perfect: mai mult ca perfect. / She said Lily had been there. then past perfect is obligatory: Lily was here. Now I was anxious to go to school. etc. if the verb expresses an event. There are three reasons for which we attribute this value to past perfect: (a) its co-occurrence with [+then] adverbials (b) the fact that it is the equivalent of past simple in Direct Speech. by the time. I had written the essay the previous evening. / She said she went/had gone to the market the day before. (b) it is seen as a past tense that expresses past anteriority . until. (resultative) He had been at work for more than two hours. in some cases the substitution is semantically impossible: When he had read the letter / *when he read the letter. [+then] Moreover. he landed a very important job . NB. past perfect is the tense we obtain if in Direct Speech we have present perfect or past simple: I have laid the table. past perfect has two dimensions: (a) it parallels the semantics of present perfect. [-then] Susan knew John had left at 5. / *She said Lily was there. before. resultative and experiential: Jim had dislocated his shoulder. like present perfect. (c) the fact that it can be used in narratives to tell ‘a story within a story’. She said she had laid the table. the past perfect occurs in both main and subordinate clauses introduced by when. past perfect has three values: continuative. past perfect may appear in narrative contexts.

we can express intentions. That's why you're tired. MEANS OF EXPRESSING FUTURITY If present and past situations are conceived of as facts. they are used to express future events. etc. Compare: I have pumped up three tires. The activity described by the verbal form does not necessarily carry on at present. the perfect progressive also carries an emotive reading. hence. and for this reason. When they do. it does not reflect any attitude on the part of the speaker . promises or threats that we mean to carry out in the future. 302). Process verb phrases in the present perfect have the tendency to appear in the progressive as well. Epistemic will and shall. even the most confident prognostication must indicate something of one speaker's attitude and so be tinged with modality" (Ioana Stefanescu. there are five other linguistic forms that. the semelfactives) acquire an iterative meaning: She's been knocking at my window for two minutes. for instance.is the simple present tense combined with a future time adverbial. English Morphology II. take place tomorrow. Again. Apart from these meanings. it is no surprise that almost all the linguistic forms that express future time belong. plans. In fact. to the sphere of modality or to the aspectual paradigm. When combined with the progressive. in fact. it may imply that the effects of a certain action are still apparent at present. (The job is completed) I have been pumping up tires in the garage for the last quarter of an hour. the continuous aspect simply reinforces the idea of continuity of an activity: He's been sleeping since ten o'clock. it is certainly not the case of future events. pp. which have not happened yet and therefore merely translate into potential.e. we can predict what will happen. Apart from the simple present. and these situations describe our attitude towards possible.that is. event verb phrases (accomplishments and achievements) turn into processes and the completion / result meaning is suspended. it is a matter that depends rather on the aspectual class of the verb phrase.It should be stated from the beginning that the use of the continuous aspect with the perfect forms is similar to the interaction of this aspect with other tense forms. Non-durative process verbs phrases (i. Finally. (I haven't finished the job yet) Although the perfect progressive never refers to a 'present result'. conveying 'irritation': You've been asking for money over and over again. Therefore. it is in the very nature of predictions to describe what might happen in the future. non-factual states of affairs. all epistemic uses of the modal verbs refer to people's present attitudes with respect to the future time sphere: The meeting can / may / must / shall / will. It is only natural for future events / states to have modal or aspectual implications since "we cannot be as certain of future happenings as we are of events past and present. Actually. It's time he woke up. Thus. state verb phrases of the locative type in the progressive develop a 'temporary or limited duration' meaning: I have been living in this castle for weeks now. 1988. beside their basic modal or aspectual quality. quite often it is implied that the respective activity has just stopped: You've been walking too fast. possible courses of action. are modal verbs denoting predictions. the only linguistic form that denotes a future event and has temporal sense alone . contain a future time implication: 1) Present Tense Simple 2) Present Tense Continuous 3) Be Going To 4) Future Tense Simple 5) Future Tense Continuous 6) Future Perfect (Simple and Continuous) PRESENT TENSE SIMPLE . on the contrary.

not as a prediction. The verbs that enter such constructions are generally verbs of 'doing'. in a narrative sequence). the suggestion of imminence of these constructions. the continuous present signals a future event anticipated by virtue of a present plan. *The sun is rising at 6. generally aiming at the near rather than the distant future. On the other hand.' Similarly. which is. arrive. At the same time. program or arrangement. involving conscious human agency. come. Compare: Hillary is rising at 6. constructions with the simple present describing a future event are restricted to certain areas. leave. in fact. committees. / School starts on Monday / next week. The reasoning behind such structures would be: "If X is a fact.made by official authorities. However. etc. If we consider that the simple present with future value describes a definite occasion in the future in the same way the simple past refers to a definite occasion in the past. this tense denotes the future either in subordinate clauses of time and condition or in main clauses.00 tomorrow. / We leave for Brasov tomorrow morning. PRESENT TENSE CONTINUOUS When used with future value. the present continuous refers only to very definite arrangements. I'm joining the fire brigade. etc. being generally accompanied by a future time adverbial. end. He's getting married in September. the second example sounds absurd because the sunrise can't be planned. unless reference time is provided by the context (like. then I predict Y. The presence of the simple present instead of a will / shall construction in the subordinate is justified by the fact that the situation contained in this clause is taken as a given fact. When I grow up. . depart. since they express an arrangement or an intention. we might say that the simple present with future value presents the highest degree of certainty as to the occurrence of a certain action in the future. like statements about the calendar. hence.00 tomorrow to prepare breakfast for the kids. In the first example we interpret Hillary as the agent who has deliberately made this plan. set off. mostly in the near future. a court of law. verbs associated with announcements about timetables. it is obvious that the continuous present with future value will not combine with state verbs normally incompatible with the progressive aspect. schedules or organized events: start. it is easy to understand why they are normally collective or impersonal . The continuous present with future value is close in meaning to the going to form. but I'm not going to buy anything. In contrast. I'm going. not possible future events. for instance. Therefore. go. programs or itineraries regarded as immutable: Tomorrow is Friday. reinforced by the presence of the purpose clause 'to prepare breakfast for the kids'. the simple present in main clauses denotes future facts. Since such arrangements are supposed to be unalterable. while the going to form is used in a wider variety of contexts and not necessarily with a time adverbial. begin. We attribute to such sentences the same degree of certainty we would attribute to present or past events. this does not mean that there are no present progressive sentences referring to the remote future. Future events expressed by means of the simple present are assumed to take place without fail.As already discussed in the chapter on the values of the simple present. they exist in as far as we make reference to remote future events determined in advance: I'm taking Mary shopping tomorrow. we have an explanation for the obligatory presence of the future time adverbial in such sentences. There is an entire range of verbs commonly used in such contexts. and thus is always accompanied by a future time expression: Are you going to the auction tomorrow? Yes. it is determined by natural law. therefore.

The second sentence refers to an arrangement already made in the past. going to can be used to refer to periods remote from the moment of speaking: I am going to be a teacher when I grow up. yet. the subject can be either animate or inanimate and the expression can occur with both 'agentive' and 'non-agentive' / 'state' verbs: She is going to have a baby next month. The second meaning of going to . We should distinguish between the going to expressing intention and the will + infinitive construction having the same meaning. Are you going to redecorate your kitchen? You look frozen. this extends to two more specific meanings: 'future fulfillment of present intention' and "future fulfillment of present cause'. The first sentence reflects the speaker's present state of mind and it may well be the case that Jim has no idea about the speaker's plan. and not state verbs: The detective is going to ask you a few questions. verbs of 'doing' ('agentive' verbs) that imply conscious exercise of the will. For instance. Though its nature brings it closer to the idea of imminence. the expectation that this will happen is stronger than in the latter. Thus. There's going to be a riot in this village. In all the above examples the underlying assumption is that factors already at work at present are inevitably leading to a certain future state of affairs. . I'll telephone for them now. I think I'm going to cry. when the intention is clearly premeditated. I'm going to participate in the board meeting tomorrow is distinct from I intend to participate in the board meeting tomorrow in the sense that the former has a higher degree of certainty.We might consider that there is a slight difference of emphasis between the two structures in a pair like: I'm going to have lunch with Jim tomorrow. I'm not going to do it again. BE GOING TO The general meaning attached to this linguistic form is that of 'future fulfillment of the present'. It's going to rain. Did you remember to book seats? / Oh no. but with a slight difference in meaning. express their intentions. It is only the second sentence that the speaker could offer as an excuse for not joining a friend for a game of snooker. A lot of paint was delivered here today. again. we employ the going to form. I forgot. I'm having lunch with Jim tomorrow. Going to can be paraphrased by intend. The kind of verbs admitted in such structures are. a sentence like It's going to rain would be uttered if the speaker saw black clouds already gathering in the gloomy sky. What are you going to do with the money? I've reminded you once.that of 'future fulfillment of present cause' . Very often either of the two can be used.is less restrictive both in point of subject choice and choice of verb class. Sit down by the fire and I'll make you some tea. or at least animate subjects endowed with will that can. hence the implication that both the speaker and Jim know about it. and when it is clearly unpremeditated we use will + infinitive: I've hired a typewriter and I am going to learn to type. thus. Going to with the first meaning is restricted to human.

etc. Compare: The soup will cool soon. and still refer to a future event. In fact.Bearing this in mind. He'll be there by tomorrow. think. Students must take into account the fact that shall and will also have other modal meanings (see chapter on Modal Verbs). In American English it is used in formal contexts: We shall never surrender to the terrorists. etc. verbs of possession. therefore something that involves the speaker's judgment and is directly related to the future time sphere. it is easy to understand why going to refers to the immediate future and is also named 'current orientation' be going to: Look out! The glass is going to fall! ('I can see it already tottering'). Birds will start to sing when spring comes. speculations and assumptions about the future (used after verbs such as doubt. I expect the train will be late. .): Perhaps I'll find another teacher after this. Shall / will with predictive meaning appear in various contexts. The soup is going to cool soon. expect. hurry and eat it before it cools. Reader: The Queen is visiting / is going to visit the southern part of the country tomorrow. I'm sure / I suppose they won't agree to our project. perhaps. Those verbs not normally used in the progressive will combine with the simple future: verbs of perception. modal verbs that express prediction. 'Current orientation' going to contrasts with prediction will to the extent that the going to form carries this sense of inevitability. in fact. the second should be interpreted as a warning for the addressee to. They are also specific of sentences with subordinates of condition and time. The future simple is mainly present in newspapers and on TV in news broadcasts when formal announcements or announcements about the weather are made. hope. refusals. in which case the main clause contains the future structure and the subordinate employs a simple present (see chapter on the values of the simple present): If I throw this plate against the wall. counseling patience. I will know him when I see him. believe. threats. they can express promises. FUTURE TENSE SIMPLE There is no future tense in modern English. Shall has a neutral predictive meaning only when used with the first person singular or plural: I shall never have the opportunity to thank him. Shall and will are. You'll have plenty of time to finish your book. They'll find out about your plans tonight. cognitive verbs. etc. If the first sentence makes a prediction. such as the going to form or the present continuous for plans: Newspaper: The Queen will visit the southern part of the country tomorrow. They may express the speaker's opinions. but for convenience shall and will combined with the bare infinitive are designated as future tense simple. in everyday conversation the listener will use other means of expressing such future events. it will smash into pieces.

otherwise the sentence is factually empty. shall / will + infinitive does not appear without a time adverbial for obvious reasons. On the other hand. as I've got a lot of other jobs for him to do first. future tense continuous matches the patterns of the present or past continuous: This time next week I'll be teaching them grammar. won't cut denotes a refusal. they simply suggest a prediction. in both cases. there is no point in saying *it will rain without mentioning when it will happen. The first sentence states that the lesson will begin at the time mentioned. the modals in themselves do not express future time. in the future) or to a temporary arrangement. In this respect. . He says that it is perfectly all right as it is.00 p.e. they'll be changing the guard in a minute and you'll get a good view. The gardener won't cut down the tree.00 p. future tense continuous has a special meaning that applies to a single event viewed in its entirety and not as going on at a point around which it creates a temporal frame. while the second example implies that their meeting is part of the ordinary course of events (perhaps they work or do business together). Apart from these normal uses. This use eliminates any idea of intention. There is a contrast between future tense continuous and present tense continuous with future value: He is seeing the doctor tomorrow. while won't be cutting suggests that the gardener's program requires otherwise. tomorrow. As already mentioned. whereas the second suggests that the lesson may have already begun and is in progress at the respective time. The first example suggests that he has deliberately arranged a meeting with the doctor. It suggests that the event predicted by shall / will will occur independently of the will of the people involved in it as part of the ordinary course of events or as a matter of routine. again in the future. the opposition is between a future with intention and a future without intention. That is why this tense has been labeled 'future-as-a-matter-of-course': Stand here. tomorrow. I'll be phoning mum and I'll tell her about your plans. When I get home my dog will be sitting at the door waiting for me. this structure will naturally refer either to an activity in progress at a specific point in time (i. He'll be seeing the doctor tomorrow. we can contrast future tense continuous with the will + infinitive construction as well as their negative counterparts. volition or plan.m. Thus. Compare: I'll phone mum and tell her about your plans.m. In the first sentence the speaker announces a deliberate future action that will occur as a result of his wishes. It is the adverbial that places this prediction in time. In fifty years' time we'll be living entirely on pills. in the second example the speaker implies that the talk on the phone will take place either as a matter of routine or for reasons that have nothing to do with the interlocutor's plans. I'll be giving a lesson at 3. FUTURE TENSE CONTINUOUS As it combines with the progressive aspect. Similarly. I'd better move the computer in my room. We can make even a further distinction between the two if we compare: I'm giving a lesson at 3.Generally. I'll be working in there next week. The gardener won't be cutting the grass for some time.

bearing no imposition on the part of the speaker: Will you please take the dog out for a walk? (request) Will you be taking the dog out for a walk? (question only) Since they are more polite and more tactful and do not put pressure on the addressee. (repeated action) Future perfect can also be used to express an assumption on the part of the speaker: You won't have heard the news. this use has been speculated in colloquial English with humorous or ironic effects. When the focus does not concentrate on the result. of course. This happens either in narratives or when applying indirect / reported speech rules: He was going to tell her what we had done. to be ready to. The police will have heard of the theft by this time. will + infinitive can express an invitation. all the future time expressions are modified according to the change of context and indicate future in the past situations. but rather on the continuity of the action. In He is to return to England tomorrow the most likely meaning is that he . FUTURE -IN-THE-PAST FORMS In case sentences have a past time axis. are quite common in everyday speech. Generally. as they cannot be interpreted as part of a routine: * The terrorists will be killing the President tomorrow. such structures have become more frequent in every day conversation. It cannot describe sudden. They were leaving town the next day. Idioms such as 'You'll be losing your head one of these days' or 'Whatever will he be doing next?' suggesting comic exasperation. the use of future tense continuous renders the question neutral.In interrogative constructions. which are both formal (to be to. On the other hand. they occur with a time expression beginning with by: By the end of the term I will have read all the twelve volumes. to be about to and to be due to) and colloquial (to be on the point of. If be going to is considered the most common form used to express future in the past. there are restrictions in the use of this linguistic form. OTHER FUTURE TIME EXPRESSIONS There are other ways of referring to the future. a request or a command. to be near to. would is preferred in literary style. Still. She said she would call me later that week. we use the progressive form: By the end of the day I will have been working for ten hours. violent or abnormal events. (continuous action) By the end of the month he will have been teaching students for a year. To be to is similar in meaning to have to / ought to and describes formal arrangements made as a result of an order / command. FUTURE PERFECT TENSE SIMPLE / CONTINUOUS These structures are used to denote future events that take place before other future events or before a certain future moment. On October 21st they will have been married for twenty-five years. to be on the verge of / on the brink of).

referring to modalities that define the notion of physical and intellectual ability/capacity. *musted) . The less developed modals do not observe it: You should be listening to what your sister is saying.) Modals are polysemous words. vs. / His flight is due at 7. possibility. it will be noticed later that the rule holds true only for the most important modal verbs (may. indicates permission.deontic (root) sense: ability. these modalities refer to duty. Though it proves to be a very felicitous distinction. The difference in meaning is reflected in their different syntactic behaviors. biology. necessity.inversion with the subject (May I borrow your car?) . Epistemic forms co-occur with the continuous infinitive to suggest an action in progress and with the perfect infinitive for past time reference and have no restrictions on the subject. May in a sentence like You may go now. There are 3 general systems of principles that can be invoked when we talk about modality: . it suggests possibility. impossibility . impossibility. unlike the latter.epistemic sense: possibility. permission. except that. He can play the violin. To be due to refers to scheduled times: The ceremony is due to begin in ten minutes. it can retain its future meaning even when it is not accompanied by a future time adverbial: The chairman of the board is to meet union officials (tonight). *canning.the social or institutional laws .the rational laws of deduction – probability. Modal verbs evince two basic meanings: . (deontic should combines with the continuous infinitive to suggest an action in progress at the moment of speaking) You ought to have paid closer attention to your guests.negative with not (You can’t throw plates at him!) . To be about to and to be on the point of both refer to imminent actions and the former is used to replace the more colloquial going to in formal contexts: I think the play is about to start now. (deontic ought to combines with the perfect infinitive to suggest past time reference) CAN / COULD .legal authority/institution or one's social status according to which you have or you don’t have authority over somebody else. Deontic forms do not take the progressive. order. do not occur with the perfect infinitive and their subject is always [+ human].) . duty .m. past or present participles (*to may. Modal verbs are a syntactically defined subset of auxiliary verbs with specific properties: . it is similar to the simple present with future value. can and must). but then we imagine that things are different and in this way we talk about possible worlds.has received explicit order to go back there.3rd person: defective (compare: I can play the piano. chemistry. compulsion.35 a.no co-occurrence (*I must can do it. . appropriateness etc. we experience certain states of affairs in the real world. certainty. whereas in He may be there already.the natural laws of physics. The chairman of the board meets union officials tonight. The problem of polysemy: there is a syntactic approach based on the idea that the distinct meanings of the same modal are reflected in their distinct distribution. impossibility. command. anatomy etc. / I am just on the point of proposing to her. MODAL VERBS Modality refers to notions like possibility. When it denotes an official arrangement or plan.no non-finite forms such as infinitives.

referring to potential acts. feel) and cognitive verbs of the type believe. (strong recommendation) or You can jump in the lake if you feel like it. not real ones. Policeman: You may park here. he was able to / *he could see that it was a fake. / He can be nasty. though this context does not rule out the use of can: Mary has now recovered from her illness and is able to / can go to school. be it written or spoken. Maybe we can go fishing next week.general permanent ability) Look.now) Can is used in parallel with a synonymous expression having a fuller range of forms . May replaces can in all contexts. In formal and polite English. there is no rule or law that prevents you from performing a certain action. when making a decision at the moment of speaking about some event in the future. / I can see the swallows flying up in the sky. (El stie sa vorbeasca engleza. Can is more widely employed than 'permission' may in colloquial English. Was/were able to refers to the actual performance of a single successful achievement. describing generic ability. Apart from replacing can in contexts for which the modal has no forms.to be able to. Permission can has an additional pragmatic interpretation in sentences like: You can forget about your holiday. the use of can suggests that 'you have permission' rather than 'I give you permission'. Ability in the future is expressed by means of either can or the periphrastic shall/will be able to with a difference in meaning. (generic) When he moved closer to the painting. being perceived as the more respectable form. However. Compare: Old man: You can park here as far as I know. couldn’t will always imply that the event didn’t take place. When used with verbs of physical perception can actualizes the reference of the verb. we encounter the opposite phenomenon. Deontic can has two past forms: could and was / were able to. You can go home when you have finished writing your essay. and Auzi cum sufla vantul?). The second meaning of deontic can is that of permission. to be able to has a specific meaning. understand. (particular) On the other hand. . unlike may which is employed when an authority gives you permission. Do you hear the wind blowing? / Can you hear the wind blowing? Each pair of sentences has the same translation (Vad randunelele zburand sus pe cer. There is no difference between could and to be able to in negative sentences. To be able to is never used when referring to something going on at the moment of speaking (see example above). we use can: I hope they will be able to book seats for the concert tomorrow. I can / *am able to swim. He can speak English. Similarly. In other words. remember. In this respect. (sarcastic suggestion). / Frenchmen can be arrogant. However. To be able to is preferred when referring to a specific achievement. (Pot sa inot. .DEONTIC CAN Deontic can expresses physical or mental ability. smell. Can is also often used to express sporadic ability or an irregular pattern of behavior: She can be quite catty. hear. can is like an aspectual marker (often not translated): I see the swallows flying up the sky. and in certain contexts we do distinguish between the uses of the two. the hearer is not usually in a position to deny permission: Can I leave now? / Can I have the salt? Negative sentences use either cannot or may not to refuse permission: . In contrast. To be able to refers to some event that will be possible in the future. could is used to express a habitual or recurrent event in the past. can is commonly used with verbs of perception (see. taste. Compare: He could play the piano very well when he was a child. In interrogations the use of can to request permission is simply a matter of courtesy.

we can establish a distinction between can and may in affirmative sentences if we conceive of them in terms of the opposition factual vs. the second sentence should be taken more seriously because it does not refer to a mere possibility that has occurred to the speaker. with the approval of the Minister. For past time reference may is replaced by to be allowed to. EPISTEMIC CAN Epistemic can expresses the possibility/impossibility of an action to take place. There is no past time for permission can with the exception of could used as a past tense form in reported speech: He said I could leave the next day. / She said that. but the verb inside has past time reference. (if any) as the authority consider reasonable. Roughly speaking. may not suggests the possibility of something not happening (illustrating cases of internal negation): If he saw a light it can’t have been the light of the car. theoretical possibility. Unfortunately. . but to a real contingency. Since the example above refers specifically to the powers a certain official is endowed with. . if he wanted. When permission is denied. (internal negation) (it is possible that he does not arrive in time) For past time reference epistemic can combines with the perfect infinitive like any other epistemic modal: He can't have had time to hide the evidence. While cannot expresses the impossibility of some action to occur (appearing in cases of external negation). he could join us. . being similar to must. Could he have spread that vicious rumor about the twins? In this case. (external negation) (it is not possible that he saw the light of the car) He may not arrive in time. so the distinction persists only in colloquial English. the speaker uses either may not or must not if the authority prohibits some action (You may not visit that family. its semantic content accounts for the presence of permission may. In questions. whereas in affirmative sentences may is preferred: He may be reading in the library. the modal has present time reference.You may not leave yet.theoretical possibility) The dollar may be devalued. the second seems to be more forceful because it is interpreted as positively forbidding an action instead of negatively refusing permission. MAY / MIGHT DEONTIC MAY Deontic may is used to grant or give permission when the speaker has the authority to do so (see comparison to permission can above). Compare: The dollar can be devalued. receive from persons to which advice is given under this section… such charges. such as a time of financial crisis. may signals the hearer's authority.factual possibility) When uttered. The nurse said we might speak to the patient. / You must not speak to her again!). whereas in reported speech might is used: I was eventually allowed to go abroad to visit my relatives. (It is possible to devalue the dollar. It is more frequent in negations and interrogations. not the speaker's. Permission may is also present in rules and regulations in formal English: A local health authority may. (I do not permit you to leave…) You mustn't talk loudly in this auditorium. Can he be reading in the library? He can't be reading in the library. (I oblige you no to talk loudly in this auditorium) Though both sentences represent prohibitions. in formal English may seems to be used to express both factual and theoretical possibility. (It is possible that the dollar is devalued.

there is an idiomatic expression with try. the theoretical . it is simply directed towards the speaker himself. He can't have already discovered the secret of that tomb. I might well decide to come.factual possibility opposition disappears. This contrasts with the use of have to (I have to / we have to) which suggests that some external authority imposes the duty: I must finish writing the essay by tonight. using may for present reference and might for past reference: Try as I might. Must has either neutral reference when. In this case the truth of the sentence or its falsity can be verified. it resembles 'permission' may. May / might combines with several adverbs that emphasize the modal expression with both present and past time reference. (the speaker is in authority) When we consider the first person singular or plural (I must / we must). a sentence like A friend may betray you is interpreted more like a warning about a particular friend. As already suggested. must expresses obligation. for instance. The university says: These people must be expelled if they disrupt lectures. In this respect. may / might refer to events in the past: He may have already discovered the secret of that tomb. When employed with its deontic meaning. (neutral) You must return all the books to the library by Friday. (internal obligation . . You have to make up a plan before you start. May / might as well expresses the idea that there is no alternative left to a bad situation: We might as well give up now because we don't stand a chance if we fight against them. MUST. focusing primarily on specific situations. epistemic may does not occur in interrogative sentences. When combined with the perfect infinitive. I might just start to trust you.I have my own program and I want to stick to it) I have to finish writing the essay by tonight. Try as he may. we notice that the idea of compulsion is not lost. For instance. can basically focuses on general situations. HAVE (GOT) TO DEONTIC MUST / HAVE (GOT) TO The relationship between must and have to parallels that between may and can in both their deontic and epistemic meanings. (NB. epistemic may is used to express possibility. On the other hand. In a sentence like A friend can betray you it is suggested that friends sometimes do that. the speaker imposes something on himself through a sense of duty or self-discipline.the teacher wants the essays tomorrow morning) Have to / have got to have either neutral or external orientation as to the source of obligation: I’ve got to be at London airport at 4. this doesn't give you the right to be rude. where can is preferred. the speaker says what somebody else requires or it can point to the speaker who is in some position of authority and imposes a duty. but this doesn't give you the right to be rude. so that we talk about selfcompulsion.) May with the sense of 'possibility' also appears in concessive clauses in colloquial English as an alternative to an although clause: You may be in charge. Although you are in charge. he can never remember people's names. and hence.EPISTEMIC MAY As already mentioned above. (external obligation . I couldn't push the door open. Also.

the evidence is such as to imply the truth of the sentence. Otherwise. the speaker pretends to interpret the hearer's need to smoke as something he cannot control rather than as a nasty habit he enjoys practicing. Subject-oriented must needs no past tense (must is different from have to only in the present).) Thus.the “natural expression of impossibility”: She must be over 40. (the event took place) As already seen. it is the hearer’s authority that is involved. (I oblige you not to reveal what I've said) You needn’t answer that question. Shall/will have to is used if there is a suggestion that the necessity is future or conditioned: I shall have to keep silent for an hour. Oh. while the latter refers to a specific occasion. The must example above is interpreted as a simple suspicion. Have got to is rarer in the past and does not imply that the event referred to took place.) Someone has to be hiding the truth. Consider: Do you have to be at school at 8 o'clock? (Is this what you have to do every day?) Have you got to be at school at 8 o'clock? (Is this what you have to do tomorrow morning?) In negative sentences must not negates the event indicating the obligation not to perform some action (internal negation). necessity is questioned in: Have you got to do it? / Do you have to do it? / Need I say more? There seems to be a difference between do you have to and have you got to in the sense that the former has a habitual or iterative meaning. (It is impossible for everyone to be telling the truth. When must is used in interrogative as well as in conditional clauses. (It is impossible that everyone is telling the truth. Again the difference between epistemic must and epistemic have to is that between factual necessity and theoretical necessity. While have to is used in formal language and has non-finite forms (will have to. The negative counterpart of epistemic must is can’t . *having got to). it suggests that the possibility of the opposite state of affairs cannot be conceived of. (You are not obliged to answer that question.Students have to be careful with their grades. having to). (it was necessary…) We had to make a trip to York to collect the bloody thing. which is again extremely ironical. have got to is characteristic of colloquial British English and is more restricted in use because of its lack of nonfinite forms (*will have got to. You have to have made some mistake here. / We’ll have to go out if you’re going to do it.can situation: Someone must be hiding the truth. Have to also expresses logical necessity: There has to be someone who knows the truth about his disappearance. unlike have to: We’d got to make a trip to York anyway so it didn’t matter too much. paralleling the may . not the speaker’s: Must I sweep the floor and wash the dishes myself? (= Are these your orders?) There is an even more restricted use of must in interrogatives with 'you' as subject that conveys a note of sarcasm: Must you really smoke those horrible cigars? In a sentence like If you must smoke. WILL / WOULD DEONTIC WILL / WOULD VOLITION WILL . whereas needn't or don't have to negate the necessity (external negation): You mustn’t reveal what I’ve said. have to is stronger than must in the sense that it does not refer to a mere assumption or deduction./ BE You must be joking.) EPISTEMIC MUST / HAVE (GOT) TO Epistemic must expresses logical necessity. For past time reference must combines with the perfect infinitive like all the other epistemic modals: He must have been flying too low. have to is used for past time reference replacing must. she can’t. you get to knowledge by inference or reasoning. I don't see any explanation for the crash. In American English have got to has acquired an epistemic interpretation: AE You’ve got to be joking. Otherwise. go to the window. Like the other modals must is used for future events: We must do something about it tomorrow. Must appears as such with past time reference only in reported speech: She said she must/had to go. whereas the have to example expresses a downright accusation.

For past time reference we use power would. Would in such questions is even more polite: Would you kindly tell me … / Would you be good enough… / Would you like to …? This type of volition will is also present in conditional clauses in the second and third persons: If you will say so. The last two examples that employ second and third persons clearly imply that the speaker is exasperated at the interlocutors' stubbornness. which parallels volition would but retains an inanimate subject (She asked if the table would bear. don't complain that she's avoiding you. volitional be willing to is more likely: I asked him and he was willing to come. I asked him but he wouldn’t come. The idea of willingness is commonly related to second .Volition will relates to either willingness (weak volition) or insistence (strong volition) or intention (intermediate volition).' Sandy. how they characteristically behave. But she loves him and she won’t leave him. power will employs inanimate subjects and is subject-oriented (the source of power is intrinsic to the subject of will): The hall will seat five hundred. Volitional would is used in adverbial clauses of condition and after wish. *I asked him and he would come. I shan’t be happy unless she will come. strong volitional will is never contracted to 'll and always stressed in speech. Since it has such an emphatic meaning. The third type of intermediate will occurs mainly with the first person expressing a promise or a threat and is usually contracted: I will pay him back for what he's done to me! We'll cut your allowance if you refuse to listen to us! We'll see about that when he returns. You know that certain drugs will improve your condition. but wouldn’t is normal. it expresses a strong refusal: They won’t give me a key.person requests of the type: Will you bring me a glass of water? Who will tell me what I've done wrong? In such questions will is a polite variant of the imperative for the 2nd and the 3rd persons. When volitional will is negated. For past time reference with subject-oriented will the form would is NOT used if there is an accomplished interpretation for the event. you will. Instead. Strong volitional will shows one's determination or intention to do something: I will see him today if that's what I want! 'I won't do it!' / 'Yes.) HABITUAL WILL Habitual will refers to a situation that takes place regularly or frequently as a consequence of a natural tendency of a person or an object: . so I can’t work. Unlike volition will whose subject is always a person or at least an animal endowed with willpower. honey. The door won’t open. I won’t have my name on the title page. why will you keep asking stupid questions? If you will ask her out every time you see her. I shall have a cake. being more conditional than will. POWER WILL Power will expresses properties of certain objects.

Should has present and future reference. EPISTEMIC WILL / WOULD Epistemic will is related to the idea of probability. we infer that John is in his office). shall is an archaic form of order still present in fairy tales. not the will of the subject of the sentence ( shall is speaker-oriented). Boys will be boys. That will be John at the door. A cat will often play with a mouse before killing it. Generally speaking must could replace will in all the examples above with only a slight difference in meaning as to the degree of certainty of the respective prediction: John must be in his office. Shall you see John today? When shall you do it? Deontic should is a weaker equivalent of deontic shall. For past time reference we employ either would or used to with the difference that used to does not have the sense of an iterated situation. unlike would whose usage is restricted to activity verbs only: He used to live in that house in those days.A falling drop will hollow a stone. SHALL / SHOULD DEONTIC SHALL / SHOULD The deontic meaning of shall is that of obligation. This imperious kind of shall. The first condition of legal justice is that it shall hold the balance impartially. can suggest either a promise or a threat on the part of the speaker. In modern English we use must. in the Bible and in legal statements or rules: He shall be punished if he does not obey. (from previous knowledge why the lights were on. for past reference combining with the perfect infinitive and acquiring a contrary-to-fact interpretation: You should pay more attention to what I'm telling you right now. that is why used to can combine with both state and activity verbs. . it is distinct from will you? which inquires about the other person’s will or willingness. therefore. She’ll be sleeping now. used with second and third person subjects. (I can see the lights on). Epistemic will is like epistemic must in the sense that the conclusion is reached on the basis of the evidence available. John will be in his office. In interrogations that employ the first person the speaker inquires about the wish or will of the addressee. If there is reference to a past situation. the sense of obligation being rendered in the form of a suggestion or piece of advice. it is the will of the speaker who imposes an obligation. John will have received the book by this time. however. He would (often) buy strawberries in those days / whenever she came. You shall never hear from me again. You shall receive a reward if you follow my advice. the inference concerning the present time as it involves a present situation. then we use will in combination with the perfect infinitive: This will be the National Gallery. Shall I go? represents an offer to go (Do you want me to go?) Used with the second person shall describes a situation which is independent of the will of the person addressed.

with a single difference: while must suggests that the speaker is confident the interlocutor will do as told. If a driver says I ought to go slowly here. ought to gives the possibility of non-action. Moreover. denoting obligation or duty. (But. DEONTIC OUGHT TO Deontic ought to is similar in meaning to must. (Perkins. in fact. (But I don't know whether you will or not) Hence. You should have told me that you were hungry. The parcel should have arrived by now. ought to represents a tentative counterpart of must and shall. It is used for assumptions about present or past situations (if combined with the perfect infinitive): The plane should be landing now. The ought to variant reflects the speaker's cautiousness in asserting that as he also takes into account that there is a slight possibility that something unexpected might have happened to require her presence somewhere else. Assumptions with epistemic should are less confident than assumptions with epistemic will. you should be sent to Siberia for what you've done. the use of ought to implies that the speaker is not very certain the addressee will perform his duty. The must variant reflects the speaker's certainty that his deduction is correct. Susan must be at her office now. he really intends to go slowly. We may say He ought to go but he won’t but an utterance like He must go but *he won’t is impossible. but if he says I must go slowly here. of which perhaps not one shall fall upon fertile ground and grow into a fair plant. unlike must. (I am sure you will. He should have finished by now means that 'I expect he has finished by now'. the implication is that the obligation will not be fulfilled. whereas He will have finished by now suggests that 'I am sure he has finished'. The general meaning of epistemic shall is that ‘someone /something is disposed towards something’. Compare: You must give some money to your sister. Who touches pitch shall be defiled. EPISTEMIC OUGHT TO Epistemic ought to expresses potential probability. he implies that he isn't going to go slowly. you didn't) EPISTEMIC SHALL / SHOULD Shall is interpreted epistemically when its modal base is the system of rational laws and where the empirical evidence implies the truth of the sentence: A flower shall produce thousands of seeds. NEED / NEED TO .) You ought to give some money to your sister. For past time reference ought to selects the perfect infinitive: You ought to have been more careful with the children. since there is evidence that leads him to the respective conclusion. again its meaning is related to that of epistemic must: Susan ought to be at her office now. 1983) Epistemic should is considered the conditional equivalent of epistemic shall. OUGHT TO Very close in interpretation to should. when used with a first person subject.If I could have my way.

wish. volition. Yet. but as formed in the mind of the speaker as a desire. thought. sometimes with more or less hope of realization. THE SUBJUNCTIVE MOOD Whereas the indicative expresses facts and is closely related to reality. and only rarely in statements. Modal need doesn’t occur in ‘affirmative’ sentences. Students must pay attention to the distinct grammatical properties of dare as modal and lexical verb: John daren’t come. forms questions and negative forms with do). with more or less belief. it indicates a theoretically possible or potential course of events that the world may take. The subjunctive expresses value judgments. except in fairly formal English with hardly. The gas tank needs to be refilled / refilling. consequently. the choice is between didn't have to and didn't need to (the lexical verb). 1935:391) While the indicative is informative. in the case of a statement. while the latter implies that as a consequence of this lack of necessity. At the same time. relating facts to moments in real time.Although they are close in meaning. conception. In How dare(d) you? / How dare(d) he / they?. I needn't have driven to school to pick up Mary but I had forgotten she'd told me she had other plans. the subjunctive is prescriptive. Lexical need occurs with a (passive) infinitive or a noun / pronoun object or a gerund: I need to know what time you'll get home." (George Curme. DARE Dare resembles need to a great extent in that it has both modal and lexical variants and it also occurs in interrogative and negative sentences. lexical dare has an additional meaning ('to challenge') if used transitively and followed by object + full infinitive: Somebody dared me to jump off the bridge into the river. or. I just need some money. / Does John dare to come? In the affirmative dare is used in the expression I daresay / I dare say. the speaker expresses indignation at the actions of the interlocutor: How dare you shout at me? At the same time. / Dare John come? John doesn’t dare to come. I didn't have / need to pick up Mary from school because she phoned me saying she would walk home. In reported speech need is retained just like must: She believed she need not fear any persecution. the subjunctive "represents something not as actual reality. need (a fi necesar) and need to (a avea nevoie) differ in point of grammatical behavior since the former is a modal verb and the latter a full lexical verb (which. Modal need is mainly used in negative and interrogative sentences as a correlative of must. in this case it expresses an unnecessary action which was nevertheless performed. They differ in that the former implies that the action does take place. commentaries about theoretical or desirable situations or commands aimed at making somebody bring about a certain state of affairs. scarcely or only: I need hardly mention how grateful I am for this opportunity. the action is no longer performed. which means 'I suppose': I daresay the plane will be delayed. sometimes with little or no hope or faith. You need only touch one of the doors for the alarm to start ringing. When we refer to a past situation. Need not expresses lack of necessity similarly to the negative forms of have to or need to. thus resembling shouldn't have and oughtn't have in as far as in all three cases the event does take place: You needn't have carried all this luggage by yourself. needn't also occurs with the perfect infinitive to refer to a past situation. . (lack of necessity) What needn't have done and didn't have / need to do have in common is the lack of necessity.

he would fail all his exams. would and could. if can be followed by modal verbs that preserve their original meaning in these contexts: should. she wouldn't have managed to overcome that situation. SYNTHETIC SUBJUNCTIVE . It's rather late. *I'll give you a call unless I come back in time. we can replace if with provided." SYNTHETIC SUBJUNCTIVE . (hypothetical past situation) An alternative to the last example is a structure introduced by unless (= only if not) always followed by the verb in the affirmative. American English tends to use this type of subjunctive in contexts such as "It's important that you go there."It's important that you should go there. But for her ambition. I'll give you a call. If one situation depends on another. I had better leave now.The subjunctive can be either synthetic (using old inflectional forms) or analytic / periphrastic (employing modal verbs. Would rather can be replaced by prefer. I won't scold you again as long as you behave nicely. At the same time. makes the possibility of an event seem unlikely: . If I don't come back in time. All of them have present and past forms. Should after if. but this requires the use of the gerund: I prefer reading to writing. I would have drowned in the sea.second form of the verb for the present subjunctive (NB. I would rather have lived in the country. TO BE has WERE for all persons) and had + third form of the verb for the past subjunctive . if it hadn't been for (for past reference) or but for. However. (hypothetical situation) They wouldn't have come to the meeting if they hadn't been invited. all followed by noun phrases: If it weren't for your interest in his studies. Apart from the subjunctive forms mentioned so far. The same context mentioned above allows the use of if it were not for (for present reference).NEW FORMS The new forms of the synthetic subjunctive ." where British English uses the analytic subjunctive . on condition that or as long as.are used in the following contexts: 1) after if: He wouldn't accept your apologies if he knew about your lies. not all negative if sentences can be turned into unless sentences: They wouldn't have come to the meeting unless they had been invited. as well as the parallel structure happen to.OLD FORMS The old subjunctive is used in formulas and after would rather (expressing preference) and had better (interpreted as suggestion or advice): Long live the Queen! So be it! Come what may! Grammar be hanged! I would rather go to the mountains than to the seaside. which are followed by the indicative: I'll lend you the money provided you don't tell my mother. the most widely used being should). In its turn. the synthetic subjunctive classifies into an old subjunctive and a new one. will. If it hadn't been for Jim.

I will clear the plates. (factual) I wouldn't like him even if he tried to be nice to me. When we aim at emphasizing completion after if. no wonder nobody wants to talk to you. It's (high) time you informed her of your failure. The negative counterpart of will indicates one's refusal to do something: If he won't listen to me. NB. Compare: I still don't like him even if he tried to be nice to me last time I saw him. If you would fill in these forms now. 2) after if only to add emphasis to a hypothetical situation or to suggest a sense of regret when combined with the past subjunctive. will you inform me? Will after if introduces the idea of your willingness to do what is suggested. suggesting that the event in the conditional sentence necessarily precedes the event in the main clause: If you have finished your meal. will in if sentences can also express obstinate insistence. NB. Apart from these two types of conditional tenses that employ subjunctive forms. Literary English also allows inversion of the subject and the auxiliary verb instead of an if clause (Had I arrived earlier instead of If I had arrived earlier. more polite: If you will join me to that meeting. It is also possible to employ the indicative after even if/though. (hypothetical) 4) after as if / as though to express an unreal comparison: He is looking at me as if I were his long-lost brother. or we use the present form of the subjunctive to imply that we are rather late in doing something: It's time (for us) to pack our luggage and go. etc. I would be very grateful. however with a difference in meaning. I could grant you the loan sooner. quite often the second part of the sentence is left out: If only I won the competition! If only she had told me the truth. I can't help him. Were I to return sooner instead of If I were to return sooner. NB. there is a third possibility that uses the indicative (usually. 5) after it's (high) time we employ either the long infinitive or a For + Accusative + Infinitive construction to suggest that the right moment to do something has come. we use a perfect form. . would in similar contexts is more tentative. On the other hand. You wouldn't have found her even if you had hired a private detective. usually referring to a bad habit: If you will laugh at people all the time.If you should hear from him/if you happen to hear from him. the simple present) in the subordinate and a future form in the main clause (see present tense simple with future value). They were acting as if they hadn't recognized him. I wouldn't have tried to talk her out of selling the car! 3) after even if / even though: They would reject her proposal even if she followed their instructions.) Had and were are in fact the auxiliaries most commonly involved in such emphatic structures.

urge. I wish you would hurry up. God forbid that your husband should find out you've been cheating on him! The king ordered that his kingdom should be divided among his sons. suggest etc. a piece of advice. to invite someone's cooperation or to indicate that either people or events frustrate his desires: I wish you would stop interrupting me. propose. THE ANALYTIC SUBJUNCTIVE This type of subjunctive appears in complement THAT-clauses of various kinds. choose in object clauses: . I wish it would stop raining. desire. we use either the indicative or the analytic subjunctive (to suggest greater improbability): I'll make a cake in case Father Ted drops by in the afternoon. It is my desire that she should be invited to our reception. Notice that a construction with would after wish is possible when the speaker intends to express an annoying habit. advise. etc.6) after wish I wish he came back sooner. prohibit. I'll save a seat for you in case you should decide to come. in object clauses: He suggested that we should take the path to the left. a resolution. beg. an intention. order. 7) after would rather when the speaker's preference involves another person's performance of an action: I would rather they invited me to the theater. hope. 8) after supposing / suppose or imagine: Suppose you inherited a huge fortune. wish. suggesting theoretical or potential states or events. which introduces a contingency or possibility against which a precaution is needed in advance. would you still have attempted to save the kid? Imagine we'd never spent this time together! 9) after in case. command. etc. He would rather his daughter hadn't behaved like a fool. SUBJECT AND OBJECT CLAUSES 1) after exercitive verbs: ask. an order. I demand that they should be treated with more respect. 2) after boulomaic verbs: want. how would you spend it? Supposing they hadn't arrived in time. recommend. I desire that he should be granted the scholarship. It is desirable that he could obtain the loan to pay for his studies. I wish they hadn't left for Rome. Function of the verb / adjective contained in the main clause or the noun phrase that functions as the antecedent of the relative clause which contains the subjunctive. a suggestion. such sentences often express either a command. or a wish. instruct.

- factive intransitive adjectives: be odd / tragic / amazing / surprising: It is amazing that they should survive after all this time. hate. I didn't choose that they should shun her. she is kind of heart. complain in object clauses: And that you should deceive us. say. be anxious / eager: I prefer that they should call before paying me a visit. I don't think you will abandon her. imagine. in object clauses: He told them that I should be more careful with the kids. It doesn't matter that Max should have bought a Cadillac. but I know that she is shamming. I desire that you should comply with my request. fancy. astonish. I am most anxious that she should get the present I bought for her. surprise. prefer. bother.I wish you should be here. arrange. I doubt that I should succeed. We dared not speak for fear the enemy might hear us. persuade etc. However little you may love her. We evacuated the building lest the walls should collapse. He had sat between the twins so that he could court them. remark.non-factive intransitive adjectives (in subject clauses): be good / right / best / important / essential / natural / (un)likely / necessary etc.: It is important that you should understand the underlying meaning of his words. matter. ADVERBIAL CLAUSES 1) OF PURPOSE: Let the dog loose so that he can have a run. It is very unlikely that he should have already received news from her. convince. think. point out. It is odd that you should have agreed to such a proposal. - non-factive transitive verbs and adjectives (in object clauses): intend. alarm. 4) in assertive sentences after doubt. 5) after emotive verbs and adjectives: .: It bothers me that he should be so obtuse. inform. 3) after verbs of linguistic communication: tell. . I called in the hope that I might find you. regret etc. I don't exactly understand it. She convinced me that I should apply for a grant. well. 2) CONCESSIVE: Foolish though she may be. but I can imagine it. He regretted that the little girl should be ill. I insist that the meeting should be over by ten. insist. It amazes me that you could give up on us so easily. - factive transitive verbs (in subject and object clauses): amaze.

Whatever sins he may have. 4) OF RESULT: We should proceed in such a manner that the public may indorse our cause. 3) OF CONDITION: Should the dam explode. I could help you if you would agree to follow my advice. we would immediately evacuate the village. She is so ill that she should be given an extra dose immediately. he can still be saved. .

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful