INTRODUCTION – INFLECTIONAL MORPHOLOGY The present course will deal with the traditional parts of speech, in particular with

the grammatical categories/inflectional categories traditionally associated with the major parts of speech such as tense, aspect, mood, for the verb (number, gender, case, determination for nouns, pronouns etc, comparison for adjectives and adverbs). Language as an object of study has been approached from different perspectives: traditional (descriptive; meant to observe and enumerate aspects of language); structuralist (descriptive; an attempt to reflect the systematic character of language); generative (language is a body of rules by means of which all the sentences can be obtained). The structure of language can be analyzed in terms of levels of representation. For any utterance there are: - a phonological level – strings of phonemes - a morphological level – morphemes and words - a syntactic level – phrases and sentences - a semantic level – semantic concepts: events, objects, states, processes “Morphology” is a term based on the Greek words morphe (=form/structure) and logie (=account/study). In fact, the term can apply to any domain of human activity that studies the structure or form of something. In linguistics, morphology is the sub-discipline that accounts for the internal structure of words. There are two types of complexity of word-structure: one is due to the presence of inflections and another due to the presences of derivational elements. Both operations add extra elements to what is known as the base. Derivation refers to word formation processes such as affixation, compounding and conversion. Derivational processes typically induce a change in the lexical category of the item they operate on and even introduce new meanings (-er adds the meaning of agent/instrument). Inflection encompasses the grammatical categories/markers for number, gender, case, person, tense, aspect, mood and comparison. It is defined as “a change in the form of a word to express its relation to other words in the sentence”. Inflectional operations do not change the category they operate on ( goes or grammars are just variants of one and the same word go and grammar). Actually, they are formal markers that help us delimit the lexical category of a word, i.e. the parts of speech. In this respect, lexical items (words) that are distributionally similar (i.e. have the same distributional properties) form classes. (Traditionalists: parts of speech, structuralists: form/morpheme classes; generativists: lexical categories). All these terms are intended to designate elements from the same pool – N, V, A, Adv, P etc. – but the different terms are associated with the theoretical frames in which they were used and, hence, with methods of doing lg. research specific for that theoretical framework.


Inflectional affixes have the following characteristics: They produce closure upon words (can no longer attach a derivational element to them) Inflected forms are organized in paradigms, i.e. they are in complementary distribution; for instance, nouns occurs in pairs hat – hats, book – books. The elements of a paradigm may evince the phenomenon of suppletion – one of the forms is not phonologically related to the other: went for go, better for good. A paradigm can be defective – lacks a form: can - *cans, trousers - *trouser. Inflections are formal markers (semantically they are empty, abstract); they help us delimit the lexical category of the word to which they attach. In other words, each lexical category (major part of speech) is characterized by specific inflectional markers. Case, number, gender, and determination characterize nouns. Tense, aspect, mood, number and person characterize verbs. Person, number and –in some cases – gender characterize pronouns. Adjectives and adverbs are characterized by comparison. Although all of them lack descriptive content, they pass on the descriptive content of the category they depend on.

Traditional approaches: The basic unit of analysis was the word. Words operated as signs, i.e. as instruments for the description and understanding of reality. They were classified into parts of speech and set into paradigms of declension and conjugation. Traditional theories described words in terms of the traditional list of Aristotelian categories. Aristotle assumed that the physical world consisted of things (substances), which had certain properties (called accidents). Transferred to morphology, the substance of a word (its meaning) had to be distinguished from its accidents, i.e. the different forms it assumed in linguistic context. Thus, certain accidental categories were considered to be typical for particular parts of speech: nouns (inflected for case, number, gender; verbs for tense, number, person, mood, aspect). Hence, what are traditionally referred to as grammatical categories correspond to the accidental categories, and this explains the older term ‘accidence’ for what is also known as inflectional variation. The Aristotelian opposition matter vs. form also helped grammarians distinguish between major and minor parts of speech. Only major parts of speech (nouns, adjectives, verbs and adverbs) were meaningful. The other parts of speech (conjunctions, prepositions, pronouns, determiners, quantifiers, etc.) known as minor parts of speech did not signify anything of themselves but merely contributed to the total meaning of sentences by imposing upon them a certain form or organization. Thus, in delimiting parts of speech, traditionalist grammars, called ‘notional’, employed three criteria: meaning, inflectional variation and syntactic function. Meaning was basic and it was correlated with the other two criteria. The last two criteria are based on formal properties, so they define parts of speech in terms of their distribution. Notional definitions were incorrect in that they were circular – a term was explained by resorting to the same term. For instance, the noun was defined as the name of a living being or lifeless thing. But ‘virtue’ is neither a lifeless being, nor a living being, the only reason for saying that ‘virtue’ is a thing is that the word that refers to it is a noun. Structuralist approaches: It is a formal approach. Language was regarded as a system of relations, the elements of which had no validity independently of the relations of equivalence and contrast that held between them (syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations). It excluded meaning from its analysis and was based only on the distribution of the items analyzed. In structuralism, the lexical items (the traditional major parts of speech) and the grammatical items (typically the minor parts of speech and inflectional affixes) are distinguished in terms of paradigmatic oppositions and fall into two classes: open vs. closed classes of items. Open classes (nouns, adjectives, verbs and adverbs) have large numbers of items and new members can be added by coining or borrowing. Closed classes (conjunctions, prepositions, determiners, pronouns, etc. and inflectional affixes) include terms that have no descriptive content, having a fixed/limited number of items. Generative approaches: They are similar to the structuralists approaches in the sense that the lexical/grammatical categories can be defined only through their roles in the rules and principles of grammar. NB grammatical categories in generative approaches no longer refer to inflectional markers, but to syntactic categories (sentence, noun phrase, verb phrase etc.). Generative grammars operate with two types of categories: lexical and grammatical/syntactic categories. Lexical categories (N, V, A) coincide with the traditional parts of speech and the structuralist open classes, and grammatical categories (NP, VP, AP) correspond to phrases or syntagms – specific sequences of words. Each lexical category has a corresponding syntactic phrase - N → NP. In other words, syntactic phrases are projections of lexical categories. Then we translate the syntactic information in N → NP into functional information (i.e. the subcategorisation frame [_ NP] which is characteristic of a transitive verb is converted into functional information by stating that direct objects are characteristic of transitive verbs). According to this theoretical model, it is not lexical categories (N, V, A etc.) that correspond to semantic categories, but major syntactic categories (NP, VP, AP etc.) The syntactic categories are in a relation of correspondence with semantic categories such as events, processes, states, individual objects etc. We shall clarify this later on when we discuss number, aspect etc. As we shall see, events are represented by the syntactic category of verb phrase, e.g. read a novel, paint a picture. Objects will be represented by

the syntactic category of noun phrases: the chair, a chair, my chair, this chair etc. In other words, the ontological (semantic) categories are represented by major syntactic phrases, not by lexical categories. The lexical categories are defined in terms of features to be found in their lexical entries in the lexicon. These features include morpho-syntactic categories, i.e. inflections. Various parts of speech display certain categorical similarities, which can be represented in terms of shared features. The most important opposition for the parts of speech system is the opposition between verbal and nominal categories. Parts of speech are analyzed along the dimension [+/- V] or [+/- N]. The [+/- N] categories (A, N) are marked for gender, number and case, while the [+/- V] categories are not characterized by these features. Adjectives and adverbs share the inflectional/functional category of comparison. Another important opposition is between lexical categories and functional categories. This opposition is in part the same as the structural distinction between open classes (N, V, A etc.) and closed classes (Determiner, Inflection, Complementizer etc) of items. The open classes are defined as classes with descriptive/semantic content (N, V, A) containing indefinitely many items and which allow conscious coining, borrowing etc. On the other hand, functional categories include free morphemes: determiners, quantifiers, pronouns, auxiliary verbs, complementizers etc. and bound morphemes/inflectional affixes: inflections for tense, aspect, agreement/number. Hence the term ‘functional categories’ covers minor parts of speech and inflectional categories. They form a closed set of items which - never occur alone, - have a unique Complement and can’t be separated from it, - lack descriptive semantic content, - act as operators placing the Complement in time, in the world - are heads of lexical categories. Information expressed by inflection is not always dictated by syntactic structure. There are two types of inflection: - Inherent/morphological inflection (not required by the syntactic context): number with nouns and pronouns, person for pronouns, gender for nouns. - Contextual/syntactic (which follows from syntax): number and person in verbs, case in nouns. For instance: They are running in the field now. He is running home now. They – 3rd – information contained in the lexical meaning of they. Hence, inherent. Are running vs. is running is contextual information provided by the context in which the verb is used and triggered by the presence of an agreement between the subject and the verb. Gender for nouns is inherent. E.g. queen. Case for nouns is contextual (triggered by the type of verb – double transitive as in ask somebody a question or a verb with dative and accusative as in lend money to someone). THE CATEGORY OF ASPECT Aspect – a notion of time, distinct from tense, which describes the internal temporal structure of events What Tense and Aspect have in common: both are functional categories delimiting the lexical category Verb, they are related morpho-syntactically (realized by verb inflections and auxiliaries) and semantically (both partake of the notion Time but in distinct ways). Where Tense and Aspect differ: Tense – represents the chronological order of events in time as perceived by the speaker at the moment of speaking; it locates the time of the event in the sentence relative to NOW Aspect – gives info about the contour of the event as viewed by the speaker at a given moment in time Traditional grammars: aspect is used for the perfective – imperfective opposition, referring to different ways of viewing the internal temporal constituency of a situation

The perfective – provides a holistic view upon the event, looking at the situation from outside The imperfective – is concerned with the internal phases of the situation, it looks at the situation from inside Current approaches: aspect covers two perspectives. It is still used to refer to the presentation of events through grammaticized viewpoints such as the perfective and the imperfective (viewpoint / grammatical aspect). In addition, the term also refers to the inherent temporal structuring of the situations themselves, internal event structure or Aktionsart (situation/eventuality-type aspect). Situation/eventuality type aspect refers to the classification of verbal expressions into states, activities, achievements, accomplishments and semelfactives (how we conceive of situations or states of affairs). Both viewpoint aspect and situation type aspect convey info about temporal factors such as the beginning, end and duration of a state of affairs/situation. However, we need to draw a clear line between them as situation types and viewpoint aspect are realized differently in the grammar of language, i.e. they differ in their linguistic expression: - viewpoint aspect (perfective vs imperfective) is signaled by a grammatical morpheme in English (be-ing); it is an overt category - situation type aspect is signaled by a constellation of lexical morphemes. Situation types are distinguished at the level of the verb constellation (i.e. the verb and its arguments (subjects and objects) and the sentence (adverbials)). Situation types lack explicit morphological markers. Situation type aspect exemplifies the notion of a covert category. Compare: She ate an apple. She was eating an apple. She walked to the park. She was walking to the park. The two components of the aspectual system of a language interact with each other in all languages, although across languages, aspectual systems vary considerably, especially the viewpoint subsystem. Situation types can be distinguished as covert categories in all languages. Since Aspect can be assumed to be defined as the interaction of the lexical meaning of the verb, the nature of its arguments (subjects and objects) and grammatical inflection, aspectual meaning holds for sentences rather than for individual verbs or verb phrases. Sentences present aspectual info about situation type and viewpoint. Although they co-occur, the two types of info are independent. Consider: Mary walked to school. (perfective – past tense, goal / natural endpoint) Mary was walking to school. (imperfective – be-ing, goal not reached) Mary walked in the park. (perfective, no goal; the event was simply terminated) Conclusion: Aspectual info is given by the linguistic forms of the sentences: situation type is signaled by the verb and its arguments, while viewpoint is signaled by a grammatical morpheme, usually part of the verb or verb phrase. The perfective viewpoint gives info about endpoints (beginning and end) while the imperfective gives info about internal or other stages or phases. The domain of aspect offers choices within a closed system to the speakers of a language. There is a small, fixed set of viewpoints and situation/eventuality types. One of each must be chosen whenever a sentence is framed. In other words, speakers’ choices in presenting actual situations are limited by conventional categorization, conventions of use and the constraints of truth. ASPECT - Conceptual features of the situations types There are three semantic features that help us distinguish among situation types: [+/- stative], [+/- telic] and [+/- durative]. They function as shorthand for the cluster of properties that distinguishes them.

Intuitively. In other cases. Events consist of stages/phases rather than undifferentiated moments.TELIC] separates situation types into telic and atelic. take place or culminate. The goal may be intrinsic to the event. consisting of undifferentiated moments.telic Atelic Atelic Telic Telic Atelic States are stable situations. States are said to ‘hold’ whereas events occur. In The rock fell to the ground. With instantaneous events. states. continue). [+/. Events are doings. the endpoint is arbitrary. Thus.stative Stative Dynamic Dynamic Dynamic Dynamic +/. the verb is intransitive/atelic) b) John pushed the cart for hours. In English duration is explicitly indicated by adverbials (for phrases) and main verbs (keep. Telic situation types are directed towards a goal/outcome. be tall. There are different types of states: basic-level states and derived stative predicates. (the verb has a direct object/internal argument. since imperfective focuses on the internal stages of durative situations. States are the simplest of situation types. as it is for activities and semelfactives. in this case constituting its natural endpoint. (repeated activity from a semelfactive) The plane was landing. (telicity given by the particle ‘up’. yet the situation is an activity) N. desire. Duration is grammaticized overtly or covertly. Basic-level states According to the type of referent they apply to.B. happen. etc). that is. accomplishments) and instantaneous events (achievements and semelfactives). they predicate a quality or property of an individual (possession.STATIVE] covers the distinction between ‘stasis’ and ‘motion’ and separates situation types into the classes of states and events (activities. accomplishments. [+/. but the subject is not an agent. N. English syntactically distinguishes between: . States are characterized by the features [+ stative] and [+ durative].g. location. as it is with accomplishments and achievements (e. basic states separate into predicates that apply to individuals (kinds of objects or objects) or to stages of individuals. they have a culmination point. The existence of telicity does not necessarily imply the presence of an internal argument (a syntactic object) and conversely the existence of an internal argument does not imply telicity: a) John stood up in a second. break). dispositions. Typical.DURATIVE] distinguishes between situation types that take time (activities. The imperfective viewpoint (be – ing) is also related to duration.B. activity and change. which can be stopped or terminated at any time. there is a final point given by the expression ‘to the ground’. Telic events are not limited to events that are under the control of an agent. The feature [+ telic] is not relevant for states because they are unbounded and have an abstract atemporal quality.durative Durative Durative Durative Instantaneous Instantaneous +/. belief and other mental states.[+/. achievements and semelfactives). basic states are: know the answer. which lack an interval. the imperfective may focus on preliminary or iterated/repeated stages: She was jumping up and down. involving causation (which includes both agentive and non-agentive subjects). (preliminary stage from an achievement) States Activities Accomplishments Achievements Semelfactives STATES +/. want. they are [+ dynamic] or [stative].

if used in the simple present or past. etc. non-temporary states (know. may also have an achievement interpretation in the context of adverbs like ‘suddenly’ or with completive adverbials. desire. sleep.a) Individual level predicates: permanent. (stage level predicate) London lies on the Thames. Multiple events also include iterations. (achievement) I like music. c) in English. They are compatible with expressions of simple duration and punctuality: He was angry for an instant. be in the garden. c) Individual / stage level predicates: with interval statives. find pebbles on the beach all afternoon. while ‘activity’ is associated with human agency. Here.B. which describe relatively stable. it rained for hours. durative. non-transitory inherent properties that apply to individuals (objects or kinds). be drunk. changing into individual level predicates. Derived statives a) generic sentences b) habitual sentences Events can be recategorized into states. laugh. love) and some verbs of mental states (know. play chess/the piano. enjoy. etc. She was hungry at noon. dynamic events. Process sentences consist of verb constellations presenting a process situation. the jewels glittered). write letters. perch. The progressive is acceptable with these predicates only if the subject denotes a moveable object. which denote transitory properties and apply to stages of individuals. run along the beach. whereas usually the progressive is associated with an active interpretation. They are semantically stative precisely because they denote properties that hold over individuals or patterns/generalizations over events rather than specific situations. although they involve no agency or change. hence the ungrammaticality of the third sentence in which London does not qualify as a moveable object. paint the fence (acc. be angry). for instance using a particular preposition: read a book (acc.) vs. (achievement) ACTIVITIES (PROCESSES) The term ‘process’ is favored over ‘activity’ because. walk in the park. I saw a star. Processes are atelic. with verb constellations of position and location (sit. Perception verbs (see). b) an atelic durative verb with a complement that is cumulative or uncountable. These qualify as multiple-event processes: eat cherries.) vs. understand). an activity has an arbitrary endpoint. sprawl. Tigers eat meat.). They may appear in the progressive. be widespread). the progressive has a stative interpretation (they denote temporary states). The socks are lying on the bed. etc. which are stative at the basic level of classification. “process” encompasses both activities associated with human subjects (external causation) ( he swam/slept/strolled in the park) and activities that are not cases of human agency (the ball rolled/moved. (state) Suddenly. repetitions of instantaneous events. there are other means of changing the telicity of a constellation. that is. paint away at the fence (activ. drink wine. and b) Stage level predicates: temporary states (be available. The verb constellations may consist of: a) an atelic verb and compatible complements (if any): push a cart. read at a book (activ. think about. verbs of feeling (like.). that is. An activity does not have a goal or natural endpoint. (state) I liked him in a second. . lie. Its termination is merely cessation of activity. such as achievements and semelfactives: cough for five minutes. (habitual) He writes novels. (individual level predicate) *London is lying on the Thames. stand). dream. Compare: I saw the city hall from my window. but never ‘finish’. be tall. which is why they simply ‘stop’ or ‘terminate’. (habitual) N. (generic) My cat eats carrots.

John kicked the ball for five minutes and then left. The maid swept the floor clean. shelve the books. (achievement) The plane was landing. recognize. An accomplishment is a causal structure of the type “e 1 causes e2) where e1 is the causing activity/process and e2 is the resulting (change of) state. this instantaneous type does not conceptualize it. b) Atelic. reach the top. ACHIEVEMENTS Achievements are instantaneous. win the race). miss the target. cool the soup. discover. Accomplishments are conceptualized as durative events. etc. The predicates are reinterpreted as multiple-event activities: John was kicking the ball when I saw him. leave. Even if some achievements may be preceded by some preparatory activity (land. He sang himself hoarse. Stereotypic achievements are: die. Also. When they occur with period adverbials and the progressive. hit. arrive. lose the watch. win the race. iterated semelfactive events. Thus. (activity) The predicates that do not presuppose a preparatory activity are known as ‘lucky achievements’: find. poison your roommate ). remember. notice. Verbs plus particle constructions also read as accomplishments: throw something away/down/up/aside/in. cook a pie. lexical causative verbs are accomplishments ( break a window. etc. lose. knock. Semelfactives do not have preliminary stages. the change being the completion of the process: build a bridge. flap a wing. simply leaving out or backgrounding the causing activity and causing factor. Thus. slam/bang the door. c) Atelic. THE ASPECTUAL RECATEGORIZATION OF VERB PHRASES Predicates shift from their prototypical class due to various elements in the verb constellations: . d) Atelic verbs and resultative phrase: The alarm clock ticked the baby awake. resultative constructions (which lexicalize both the causing activity and the resulting state) qualify as accomplishments: The wind shaped the hills into cones. durative verbs and directional complements: The kid walked to school. consisting of a process and an outcome / change of state and having successive stages in which the process advances to its conclusion. die. But remember that we can focus on the preliminary stage and turn the achievement into an activity if we employ the progressive: The plane landed. instantaneous events: cough. accomplishments are complex events because they have other event types as their components. accomplishment constructions consist of constellations that have: a) Atelic. durative verbs and countable arguments: They drank a glass of beer and left. In a nutshell. drink a glass of wine. find a penny.ACCOMPLISHMENTS Accomplishments describe change-of-states prepared (brought about/caused) by some activity/process. repair a car. SEMELFACTIVES Semelfactives are atelic. they are interpreted as derived durative processes/activities consisting of a series of repeated. single stage events that result in a change of state. hiccup. remember. reach the top. kick the ball. notice. recognize. durative verbs and certain prepositions: The boy ran out. Achievements focus mainly on the change of state. nor resultant stages.

kill turn into states when used in the simple present form. He played chess for two hours. (achievement) Tourists discovered that beautiful castle for years. (activity) Tom walked two kilometers in half an hour. Tom wrote the essay in two hours. Tom walked for an hour. states. The tourists have discovered a beautiful castle. N. (accomplishment) (4) Tense: Habitual sentences always designate states.B. (accomplishment) If an activity combines with a locative noun phrase. Tom ate his hamburger in three minutes. (activity) If the direct object of an accomplishment or an achievement is a mass noun. Tom walked in the woods for an hour. scratch. (activity) He discovered a treasure in the backyard. (activity) / She combed her hair in two minutes. (accomplishment) Tom ate popcorn for an hour. cut. designating a general characteristic of the subject: The wood is burning in the fireplace.(1) Subject: If the subject of an achievement is an indefinite plural noun phrase or a collective noun. (activity) Tom walked to the building in ten minutes. (activity) / Tom read a book in an hour. (state) (5) Progressive / Continuous Aspect: When used in the progressive aspect. the achievement recategorizes into an activity. it turns into an accomplishment. Some verbs can have several readings even though the verb phrase does not undergo any change of the type illustrated above: Tom read a book for an hour. (activity) (3) Adverbials: If an activity is combined with an adverbial of extent. it turns it into an activity. (activity) He plays chess (every day). sometimes with a frequency adverbial. Almost any verb can become part of a habitual sentence if used in the simple present. (accomplishment) Tom wrote essays for two hours. (state) Activity verb phrases such as rub. (accomplishment) She combed her hair for two minutes. (achievement) Tom has been discovering lice in his son's hair for three days. (activity) The battalion was crossing the border for twenty minutes. they become activities. (state) He is killing a chicken for dinner. (accomplishment) ASPECTUAL CLASSES OF VERB PHRASES AND THE PROGRESSIVE ASPECT . (activity) / This burns like fire. burn. (activity) (2) Direct Object: If the direct object of an accomplishment or achievement is a bare plural noun phrase. accomplishments and achievements recategorize into activities unfolding at a certain reference time. (activity) / Your behavior kills me. it becomes an accomplishment.

be young. The river is flooding. (process unfolding now) The second set of sentences describes temporary activities under the control of the individuals. etc. (2) mental cognition verb phrases: know. they express temporally and spatially limited processes unfolding at a certain reference time. etc. meanwhile. all the while. (accomplishment) They were building the house when the accident happened. kick. hope. knock. semelfactives: jump. ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND ACHIEVEMENTS The internal structure of accomplishments and achievements presupposes a final goal. Hence. When they occur in the progressive. Compare: He is a teacher.). (achievement) When his son came running to help him. (general properties) He is being rude tonight. However. allow us to refer to only a temporally limited stage of the individual. Yet. describe a series of repeated processes rather than a single process: The boy was kicking the ball against the wall. tap.). / While she was rehearsing for the show. tremble. The dog is jumping up and down. with or without adverbials expressing duration (all the time. They hope to win. I think he is wrong. the verb will never appear in the continuous (be tall. When used in the progressive. certain adjectives / nouns express properties that can be altered and thus. Her lips were trembling. (1) to be + property-designating adjectives and nouns: If the adjective / noun designates a permanent property of an individual. (activity) The man fell into the river and drowned. they acquire an activity reading. outcome or result that is suspended when the respective verb phrases combine with the progressive aspect. . When they appear in the continuous. think. They built their house in two years. / He was hoping against hope that there was still a chance of success. be old. in which case the use of the progressive is required. activity verb phrases designate processes unfolding at a certain reference time. the man was already drowning.ACTIVITY VERB PHRASES Used in the continuous aspect. etc. her maid was sewing her dress for the gala. / As he was crossing the street. nod. wonder. Sometimes they describe two simultaneous processes and are connected either by and or by subordinating conjunctions such as while. as. he slipped on a banana skin and broke a leg. trust. they do not normally combine with the progressive. believe. pat. They are said to designate a property of the subject that lasts throughout time. / Meanwhile he was trying to find out who had robbed him. They refer to a manifestation of the individual. etc. / I was only imagining those ugly scenarios. (activity) STATE VERB PHRASES States are defined as having an abstract quality and an atemporal interpretation. / She is taller than you. for some time. / You're being a total bastard. all day / night long. Compare: I imagine she will agree to your proposal. / I'm thinking of giving up smoking. The implication is that their behavior is deliberate and they can put an end to it if they want to. etc. there are certain state verb phrases that may appear in the continuous. imagine. not to a characteristic property of his. which refers to situations of limited duration. slam / bang the door. changing their meaning.

Time is durationally infinite and segmentable. TENSE TIME VS TENSE (TIME IS REFLECTED BY TENSE) - Time is objective in the sense that it does not have absolute reality outside the form of our perception of the world. rest. they express temporary properties. Again. the atemporal quality of the state verbs is replaced with the temporal quality of the process unfolding for a certain period of time. the subject deliberately does the action of 'weighing' or 'measuring': The baby weighs six pounds. (I have made an appointment) (4) emotive verb phrases: love. Instead. / I'm smelling your perfume to see if I can guess what it is. / The nurse is weighing the baby. stand. / He is standing near the pole. . If used in the progressive. they appear accompanied by the modal verb CAN: I hear the wind blowing. Even if they make reference to an act of perception unfolding at a specific moment like NOW. Time is segmented by two different procedures: . (they are listening to and trying the case). they avoid the use of the continuous. / He is tasting the soup to see if it's got enough salt. want. measure.(3) physical cognition verb phrases: see. . The necklace belongs to me. dislike. remain. hate. which preserves the sequential character of our perception of the world. / *I'm hearing the wind blowing.a public estimate based on the periodicity of natural phenomena Accordingly. See and hear even acquire new meanings when appearing in the continuous: The court is hearing the evidence tomorrow. . / I can hear the wind blowing. lie. Such verbs appear in the continuous if their subject represents a moveable object and describe temporary states: Her new house stands / (*is standing) at the corner of our street. weigh. / I was envying him his freedom at the time. Verbs like weigh or measure have a behavior similar to that of perception verbs. In this case the subject is attributed intention or purpose: You smell nice. hear. I'm seeing the doctor next week. contain.a personal subjective estimate of duration . The milk tastes sour. It they combine with the progressive.Time has a linear representation. / Are you belonging to the local library? The castle costs a fortune. I despise bad behavior. like. / The mistake is costing us dearly. we perceive it as unidirectional (forwards). smell.Time is an epistemic notion as it mirrors our experience of the world. they describe processes going on for a limited period of time. (6) locative verb phrases: sit. Everybody envied everybody in that room. it is not inherent to objects. / He will be despising me heartily. (5) other property designating verb phrases: belong. consist. they do not occur in the progressive if they denote a general characteristic of a certain individual / object. miss. etc. taste. feel Also referred to as 'verbs of perception'. etc. etc. that is. there is .

A proper interpretation of temporal forms presupposes an analysis of the relation between (i) (ii) tense specification of the V (i. we apply the relation of simultaneity wherever possible. Tense is a functional category that expresses a temporal relation to the orientation point (ST) in the sense that it locates in time the situation talked about. (now / tomorrow) Albert was playing tennis.e. time measurement is subjected to public agreement and it is based on the periodicity of some observable natural phenomena (revolution of the earth round its axis. We know that information about the selection of complements by a verb is part of the lexical entry of that verb in the lexicon and it represents more or less its descriptive content. Events can be simultaneous with ST (at relation) or they can be sequential to it (before / after relations). adverb phrases and adverbial clauses and they specify RT together with tense inflections. TENSE: MORE THAN TENSE INFLECTIONS A common mistake in approaching the category of tense is the belief that tense inflections alone mirror time. In addition to this. All accounts of tense make interpretation sensitive to tense. the descriptive content of a verb is the idea of event. speech time (ST). about predicate temporal interpretation. there are regular co-occurrences between tense inflections and time adverbials (there are adverbials that co-occur only with simple past or only with present perfect and there are others that co-occur with both). i. we cannot conceive of this event without taking into account the complements of the respective verb as well as those explicit lexical means of placing the event in time: time adverbials. Tense is a deictic category.- a personal time: man’s endeavor to measure duration by using his emotions as an instrument (time is expanded or contracted) a public time. roughly speaking. the moon.e. we have to talk about sentence temporal interpretation or. ST/NOW is a central point on the temporal axis of orientation according to which we interpret the ordering of events/states. its periodic relation to the sun.e. the stars etc) TENSE: A DEICTIC CATEGORY Tense is generally defined as representing the chronological order of events in time as perceived by the speaker at the moment of speaking. characteristic of society. In fact they are not enough to express the temporal specification of a message. sentences without time adverbials may be non-ambiguous due to the context. The latter add meaning to a sentence and during the process they might even disambiguate it. A VP consists of both its lexical head V0 and the complement(s) it has selected. tense inflection) and temporal adverbials. at least. TIME/TEMPORAL ADVERBIALS Time adverbials include adverbs. . It means that when discussing temporal interpretation. (then / future) This actually means that we associate with a sentence that is vague the temporal interpretation that requires the least additional information (sort of default reading). Tense inflections are strongly related to adverbials. On the other hand. If we assume that. the moment NOW is central in the sense that time past or time future represent DIRECTIONS whose ORIENTATION depends on ST. i. which acts as a time adverbial giving a certain temporal reading or due to the fact that people tend to maximise available information. Albert is playing tennis. INFL identifies the event of the VP in the sense that it places that particular event in time.

Duration adverbials: for three months/a day/a week.Classification of time adverbials The relation between time adverbials and ST can be explicit or non-explicit. for a while. 2. (coercion into a process) 2. a. into state – habitual) The felicity of the aspectual reinterpretation is strongly dependent on linguistic context and knowledge of the world. For months. 1. etc. all day long. John crossed the border all afternoon. they locate the situation at an interval during which the event is completed/culminates. completive adverbials are telic compatible with telic situations and odd with atelics 1. into activity) 3. locating / frame adverbials and frequency adverbials. in a second. We distinguish between: (i) (ii) anchored time adverbials which are in an explicit relation to ST in the sense that their temporal interpretations are determined relative to ST (now. requiring compatibility with the situation type. Such clashes are resolved by a shift in the value of the verb constellation. yesterday. (atelic) (?) John wrote a / the report for two hours. always. within two months. Jon played the sonata for two hours. John noticed the painting in a second. (atelic) Andrew swam for three hours. into state – habitual) 6. I read a book for a few minutes. into process of the multiple-event type) 4. 3. since the war/Christmas. they indicate the duration of the described event by specifying the length of time that is asserted to take contribute to the location of the event in time. tomorrow) unanchored adverbials which do not have an explicit relation to ST and which orient themselves to times other than the utterance time or to utterance time (in June. they have various interpretations. 3. permanently. more specifically within the stated interval compatible with atelic sentences. 2. on Friday). Mary went to school in the morning. Aspectually. Whenever telic events occur in the context of duration adverbials there is a clash between the aspectual properties of the situation type and the aspectual properties of the adverbials. Completive adverbials: in 2 hours. which receives a marked interpretation. Compare: *John went into the house all afternoon. completive adverbials. . the train arrived late. (semelf. but odd with telic sentences compatible with states and processes (activities) 1. through August. for hours. during the war. (acc. over the weekend. 4. Mary wrote a sonnet in five minutes. b. Given that temporal adverbials also contribute to the aspectual interpretation of sentences we can establish a further classification that distinguishes among: duration adverbials. John knocked on the door for two hours. all afternoon. (acc. This contextual interpretation is made possible by the process called coercion. (acc. Susan was asleep for two hours. into process – iterative: many times) 5. (ach. Duration and completive adverbials also have an aspectual value (they are sensitive to the aspectual value of the situation). (telic) *The train arrived late for two hours. all the time. For years. at night. Jerry wrote a report for two hours. (?) Bill swam laps in an hour.

4. “She knocked at the door in ten minutes” (after ten minutes). Kind referring expressions are bare plurals. this year. in the evening. in three days.the speech time . on Christmas. daily. deictic adverbials: oriented to the time of utterance (ST): now. at lunchtime.e. Frequency adverbials: frequently. therefore. on Sundays. geographical statements. the present is between the past and the future. Generic sentences are true of some particular entities. The same interpretation as the latter occurs with achievements and semelfactives: “They reached the top in ten minutes” (after ten minutes). every week/month etc. tonight. two weeks ago 2. VALUES OF PRESENT TENSE SIMPLE 1. whenever. The possible telic reinterpretations are: “Bill swam his planned number of laps in an hour”. these NPs get a generic interpretation only when occurring in characterizing sentences. the future is the least factually determined time. Present simple is associated with stative verbs and it is used in scientific language. If (3) and (4) can be understood at all. Generic sentences are timeless statements expressing general or universal truths. they indicate the recurrent pattern of situations within the reference interval they express a series of events which as a whole make a state of the habitual type: We often/always went/go to the mountains in wintertime. at night. tomorrow. in 1987 PRESENT TENSE SIMPLE Present Tense Simple is associated with the present moment . anaphoric adverbials: relate to a previously established time: until. once a week. on Sunday. definitions. proper names and quantified NPs but in this case the locus of genericity is not in the NP but rather in the sentence itself. monthly. in March. GENERIC VALUE – unmarked value Present Tense Simple used in generic sentences indicates the validity of a state at speech time without making reference to a particular situation or moment. i. it appears in so-called ‘characterizing’ sentences. august 19. Locating adverbials / Frame adverbials: they locate situations in time by relating them to other times or to other situations they refer to an interval of time within which the described situation is asserted t have taken place according to the time of orientation we can distinguish three classes: 1. “At the end of an hour/after an hour Mary began to believe in ghosts”. As far as its factual status is concerned. . It ascribes a property to a subject. sometimes. two years later. last Sunday. today. in the sense that the adverbials refer to an interval elapsed before the beginning of the situations and not an interval during which the situations occur. in instructions or when specifying game rules etc. “In/after an hour Bill swam laps”. often. d. c. definite singular NPs and mass nouns. referential adverbials: refer to a time established by clock or calendar: at six. the sense that it may refer either to a point in time identified with speech time (ST) or to an interval that includes the moment of speaking. in proverbs. They can also appear with indefinite NPs. namely ‘kinds’. On the contrary. The present expresses both situations whose time of occurrence is known and situations whose time of occurrence is not known. before. early. The past is considered to be factually determined since we know if an action took place or not in the past. (?) Mary believed in ghosts in an hour. already 3. never. last week. they impose an ingressive interpretation to the sentences.

Seth and Minnie come forward as far as the lilac clump… He nudges Minnie with his elbow… (O’Neill. It is used in sports commentaries. more often than not they have less than complete temporal specification. pronounce. The instantaneous present is also used in performative sentences that employ performative verbs verbs that themselves are part of the activity they report .such as accept. Compare: They visit me every two days during holidays. often. Very often. books or movies and stage directions: Hagi takes the ball and passes it to Popescu. London stands on the Thames. and exclamations. When having an instantaneous value. (unspecified frequency) He doesn't eat many vegetables. seldom) and specific (three times a week. every two weeks). Popescu sends the ball into the net. never. they do not point to a specific moment in time and in this respect they resemble generic sentences. unlike generic sentences. war reports. twice a day. but this simultaneity is rather subjective than objective. name.Water boils at 100ºC. We sentence you to prison for life. (specified frequency and interval) They visit me every day. I hereby pronounce you man and wife. they include adverbs of frequency classified into general (ever. A performative act is felicitous on condition that the persons and the circumstances . the use of the simple present is rather dramatic since it insists on the total completion of the event mentioned. habitual sentences refer to an individual or an object about which the respective property is true at speech time. In performative sentences the event reported and the act of speech are simultaneous simply because they are identical. commentaries on pictures. Habitual sentences may be completely specified. deny. whenever. However. Events that are simultaneous with the moment of speaking may be expressed either by a simple present or a present continuous: He shuts the window. INSTANTANEOUS VALUE . 2. indicating both the frequency and the interval during which an event takes place. demonstrations. whereas the continuous present represents a neutral description of an action going on at the moment of speaking. usually. HABITUAL VALUE – unmarked value Habitual sentences indicate that a situation is repeated with a certain frequency during an interval of time. Since they do not focus on a particular situation but rather on its recurrence. declare. Blood is thicker than water. the performative verb appears in the first person singular or plural and may be accompanied by hereby: I name this ship "Queen Mary". (unspecified interval) He eats a lot of vegetables in winter.marked The instantaneous simple present refers to an event that is assumed to be simultaneous with the moment of speaking. / He is shutting the window. Mourning Becomes Electra) It is true that in most cases the event does not occur exactly when it is mentioned. Yet. Goal! First I roll out the pastry. (no frequency and no interval) 3. and then I add the mixture and spread it… Here comes the winner! In ‘Gone with the wind’ Scarlet writes a letter. However.

as it were. (direct object clause) / I don't know this. the anticipated event is attributed the same degree of certainty that we normally assign to present or past events. I will be very unhappy if our team does not win. the show will have already begun. (instantaneous reading because of the suggestion of instantaneous perception indicated by "Look") He scores goals. For this reason the simple present with this value represents the only marked way to express the future time in English. PAST VALUE . I will take my umbrella if it rains. The use of the simple present with future value in adverbial clauses of time and condition has more than a syntactic explanation. tomorrow. (direct object clause) / I don't know this.involved in it are appropriate for the invocation of the respective procedure (for instance. (habitual interpretation because of the plural direct object) He scores a goal. itineraries etc.marked The use of the Simple Present with a past value is best known as the historic present and represents a storyteller's license.m. The simple present with this value often alternates with a time adverbial indicating the past: . The use of the simple present signals the fact that the future event is bound to happen. unless etc. whereas the event expressed in the latter is a fact that is taken as given. the rule applies only to those cases in which when and if introduce adverbial clauses of time and condition. Both habitual and generic sentences may receive instantaneous readings under certain circumstances: Swallows fly higher than doves. 5. (time clause) I don't know when I will see him. schedules. when. in other words. arrive in London at noon and set off for Glasgow in the evening. In the examples below the content of the adverbial clause is assumed to exist as a fact: I'll see what to do when I meet him. There is a contrast of meaning between the main clause and the subordinate. (instantaneous interpretation) 4. (generic reading) Look. It refers to mostly official or collective future plans or arrangements that cannot be altered. However. being typical of an oral narrative style. what he is recounting. as vividly as if it were now present before his eyes". The event referred to in the former is a prediction. which provides an axis of orientation for the action predicted in the main clause.: The caravan sets off tomorrow morning. if. the swallows fly higher than the doves. before. It may relate to timetables. NB. or recalls. As Jespersen (1931:17) remarked. In simple sentences it is accompanied by a temporal adverbial indicating the future: The plane leaves for New York at 5 p. it is only a priest that can marry you and this can happen only in a church). forgets all about time and imagines.marked The simple present may acquire a future value either in simple sentences or in subordinate adverbial clauses of time and condition introduced by after. (conditional clause) I don't know if it will rain. Students are inclined to think that they must use only the simple present after clauses introduced by when and if. By the time you get there. the "historic present is pretty frequent in connected narrative: the speaker. We leave Bucharest on Monday morning. FUTURE VALUE . as soon as. Compare: I will talk to him when I see him.

Gore shakes hands with Mr. the simple present often alternates with a past tense. Compare: Brahms is the last great representative of German classicism. In such cases. it is also present in photographic captions in newspapers. imaginary events. and if he uses the past. Brahms was the last great representative of German classicism. The fact was she had made a private marriage… (Thackeray. the use of the present seems to transfer the verbal meaning from the initiating to the receiving end of the message. Mr. the content of the event or state described being actually recollected at speech time. a distinction has to be made between the historic present described above and the present forms employed to narrate fictional. His lordship had no sooner disappeared behind the trees of the forest. so that communication is still in force for the receiver. Stefanescu. telling me the boss wants to see me in a hurry. then he considers that the artist still survives through his work. There are two basic elements of meaning involved in the common use of the simple past. in historical summaries and tables of dates: MPs back school reform. (in a letter) Your correspondent Mr. etc. then he sees the artist as a person who died at a certain moment in the past.At that moment in comes a messenger from the Head Office. (photo caption) 1876 . speakers do not need to locate a past event by means of a time adverb. / Ex-president dies of heart attack. Though tell and hear in the examples above refer to the initiation of a message. in 1974. giving the reader the impression that he is actually witnessing the events described. The historic present is also used after verbs of linguistic communication such as tell. but Lady Randolph begins to explain to her confidante the circumstances of her early life. Pitt writes in the March issue that… (in the correspondence column of a journal) In both cases the simple present emphasizes the persistence in the present of the effect of a past communication. 614) PAST TENSE SIMPLE The simple past is used to locate a situation at some specified time in the past. two days ago. This fictional use makes reference to no real time. the situation described by the simple past takes place before the present moment. The difference between using the present and using the past simply involves the speaker's point of view: if he employs the present. which means that the moment NOW is excluded. learn. its use reminding one of the dramatic quality of the instantaneous present. that is. LIX. the simple present may also refer to imaginary situations. / I bought this dictionary when I was in Lisbon. Although so far all the uses of the simple present have involved real facts. last summer. However. The simple past may appear alone if the speaker who has a specific time in mind can assume that his interlocutor can . He was born in London in 1952 and spent his entire life there. the person uttering the sentence must have a definite time in mind suggested by means of specific time adverbs ( yesterday. hear: Mary tells me that you are going to buy new furniture. Second. Finally.). but to an imaginary present time. (I. Ch. / I just talked to him on the phone a moment ago. say. 1988:261) However. First. At the same the historic present is employed when describing an artist and his work because this feels as if they were still alive. Bush.Brahms finishes his first symphony. the simple present appears in newspaper headlines to announce recent events. Virg.

the simple past is no longer accompanied by a time adverbial and the situations described by this tense are ordered by the laws governing the narrative mode rather than by information present in the sentences proper. i. we use the simple past for narrative even when referring to future events as in science fiction. the simple past can be used without a definite adverb of time if the utterance refers to a comparison between present and past conditions as in: Bucharest is no longer what it was / used to be. . then set it down again and went out into the scullery. such a retrospective view. but he is less of a nitwit than he was. / I finished reading the book last night. / B: Well." . and a great moth flew into his face.Collected Stories) Moreover. etc. In this case the location of the event in time is established in relation to the moment of speaking NOW: Haydn was born in 1732. However. Thus. Once an anterior frame of reference is established for the discourse it is only natural to refer to the already introduced situation by means of a definite specifier. He opened the garden door. Finally. in this case. 2. DEICTIC VALUE The simple past can be used deictically with a deictic adverb of time of the type yesterday. In the last example. I couldn't find her either.'In the Garden' . of course. last night. whether the events narrated are real historical events or just fictional situations devised in novels. two years ago. / A: What did you do there? / B: I had lunch. S. The latter is used to introduce an unspecified event that takes place anterior to the moment of speaking in a period that began in the past and includes the moment NOW. He picked up a chair. / My friend left for Poland in July. Leech (1971: 10). NARRATIVE VALUE Since it deals with past events the simple past is a natural choice for narratives. Another particular case in which a past simple is used without a definite adverb of time involves a combination with the present perfect. / He is a nitwit. speaker A specifies the past moment and speaker B does not need to mention it in his turn. Any narrative normally presupposes.A. Then he stepped out into the garden and faced the enemies. in the imagination. the simple past: A: Where have you been? / B: To the restaurant. "We are invited by this convention to look at future events as if from a vantage-point even further in the future. in the first two examples above the definiteness of the situation is confirmed by the definiteness of the participants involved (my message) or of the circumstances (Led Zeppelin did perform in Bucharest on a specific day which is officially known). It is the whole context created by the advancing of the story that supplies the order of the events. the interplanetary transit vehicle Zeno VII made a routine journey to the moon with twenty people on board. '(…) She left him alone in the kitchen.e. only that it be specifiable.understand this either by inferring the time from the larger context in which the situation occurs or by making use of the definiteness of the participants involved: Did you remember to give him my message? Did you see Led Zeppelin perform live in Bucharest? A: I couldn't find Mary at the party last night. in 1987. In the year AD 2201. Thus it becomes obvious that the definiteness of the event expressed by the simple past does not necessarily presuppose that the time in question be specified.(…)' (Dylan Thomas . VALUES OF PAST TENSE SIMPLE 1.

Other verbs often present in similar contexts are wonder and think. I went out with my friends.i. After I (had) finished dinner. Unlike a present form. which indicates anteriority: I (had) read twenty more pages before I went to bed. (non-habitual) My dog chased cats. indicating the recurrence of the event. (simultaneous) He unlocked and opened the door. HABITUAL VALUE When used with this value. which adds a further overtone of politeness: .3. allowing speaker A to either accept or decline the request. "Do you want me?" would have been rather imperative. Although speaker B could have used the present instead of the past. which appears in everyday conversation making reference to the present feelings or thoughts of the speaker: A: Did you want me? B: Yes. whereas a reversal of the order of the events in the second example is impossible basing our judgment on our knowledge about the way these activities can be performed. she rose quickly and left the room. Similarly. He enjoyed and admired her paintings. Compare: Brian runs a mile every day. The habitual interpretation can be rendered by the frequency adverbial whose determiner must be indefinite or by a plural indefinite object: I went to the mountains three times a year. the past form avoids a clash of wills. the simple past refers to events recurrent within a given past interval of time. Unlike simple present sentences in which the time adverbial specifies the event time . Brian ran a mile every day during his childhood. more polite. (habitual) I went to the mountains three times that year. I hoped you could give me a hand with the cleaning. and would have implied that the former was not at all pleased with speaker B making a request. which would have made a polite answer impossible.e. (non-habitual) My dog chased my neighbor's cat / a cat. simple past sentences allow the presence of both a time adverbial indicating the frequency specification and a time adverbial that supplies the interval during which the recurring event took place. speaker A's question indicates politeness. As soon as she saw / had seen me. his choice of the respective verbal form renders the request indirect and thus. the temporal relation between two consecutive events can be overtly marked by means of conjunctions (preserving the simple past in both the main clause and the subordinate clause) or by the auxiliary HAVE. 5. PAST PERFECT VALUE This value is derived from a contrast between simultaneous past events and past events occurring in a sequence. (habitual) 4. On the other hand. PRESENT TIME VALUE This represents a special development of the normal past meaning. suggesting that speakers A and B have similar social positions. (sequential) In the first example the order of the events can be reversed without altering the meaning of the sentence. The event of unlocking the door necessarily takes place before its opening and thus the simple past "unlocked" has past perfect value. in most cases they are used in combination with the continuous aspect.

the event of John’s reading the book in is entirety is specified/dated as occurring during last year. ET is indefinite and “specified” only by indefinite adverbials: since 3 o’clock. for two hours. so far. we should clarify the relationship between the English perfect and the perfective aspect.I wondered / was wondering if you could help me with the kids while I am away. In “John has already read the book”. without identifying any particular point or interval of time. yesterday. Compare “You woke him up when you went to the bathroom ten minutes ago. rather. John knows what the book is about.e. The present perfect serves to locate an event within a period of time that begins in the past and extends up to the present moment (and includes it). the past tense specifies that an event occurred at a past time that is separated and distinct from the present. What we need to understand is that the 'result / completion' meaning is not intrinsic to the perfect. Without renouncing the idea that the perfect marks anteriority. Have you known my uncle for a long time? . yet. Thus. since / for phrases). relevant to the present moment through its result: now. I thought I might drop by later tonight if you don't mind. just like the other meanings of the present perfect. the perfect may acquire different senses according to the type of aspectual class 'have' combines with: 1) continuative perfect 2) experiential perfect 3) resultative perfect 4) 'hot news' perfect CONTINUATIVE PRESENT PERFECT When the present perfect combines with state verb phrases in sentences that contain a durative adverbial (for instance. plus the temporal adverbials it co-occurs with. thus. since the English perfect is quite often related to the meaning of completion or result. Before embarking upon an analysis of the two tenses mentioned above.” to “You’ve waken him up” – the present perfect itself in the second sentence locates the effects of the event at NOW. PRESENT PERFECT Past events can be predicated about either in the past tense or the present perfect from two different perspectives. they express states extending over a period of time that lasts up to the present moment: I have lived in Paris since 1987. but the event is related and. we can maintain the connection between the perfect and the perfective in view of the fact that what is 'summed up as a whole' (i. (b) The Current Relevance Theory – it is only present perfect that claims relevance at the moment NOW. The castle has been empty for ages. (c) The Extended Now Theory – speakers can psychologically ‘extend’ the present backwards by means of present perfect in English. a feature the past simple lacks. which is prior and thus distinct from the moment NOW. There have been several theories that tried to capture this distinction between the past simple and the present perfect: (a) The Indefinite Past Theory – present perfect locates events somewhere before the moment of speaking. ET of past simple events is definite: at two o’clock. etc. we understand that John’s reading the book in its entirety occurred at some unspecified time in the past. etc. perfective) may also be anterior to a certain moment in time. in contrast. In “John read the book last year”. In contrast. it stems from the interaction of the perfect form with the aspectual meaning of the verb phrase.

this iterative use closely resembles the continuative use of the perfect and. If the definite time when the experience occurred is mentioned. A: When did you go? B: Oh./ Ever since the house has been occupied the poltergeist have been acting up. that’s when I did. When I have tried to join their club./ It has been snowing since noon. I have followed her behavior every day since she got here. Used with process verb phrases and a frequency or a durative adverbial.g. Have you ever been to the States? Have you visited the Dali exhibition? The temporal location of some events may be very close to the moment NOW. in fact. such use is often accompanied by adverbials of time of the type never. on and off) EXPERIENTIAL PRESENT PERFECT With process and event verbs phrases (accomplishments and achievements).e. b) limited experiential: Have you had a letter to type today?/ She has already had three proposals this morning. without carrying any other information. always. that the time when it takes place is not mentioned. already. there are exceptions to this rule if the semantic content of the respective sentence suggests a period leading up to the present. Such examples often contain adverbs like just. The news has been broadcast at ten o'clock for as long as I can remember. I have lived in Paris simply places the situation at some unspecified point in the past. b) discontinuous continuative: He has been building the house for the last five years.g. last April. (i. the speaker shifts from Present Perfect to Past Tense: e. Therefore. the perfect expresses a habit and thus has a recurrent continuative reading: Mrs. the adverbial of duration cannot be absent from the sentence or otherwise the construction acquires an indefinite past reading. In I've had a good life or You've outstayed your welcome the adverbials of time are felt as implicit ('during my life' / 'so far' or 'for too long' in the case of 'outstay'). I went to Hollyrood Palace. they have constantly turned me down. the perfect may refer to some indefinite situation in the past. we may subsume it in the previous class as a type of 'recurrent continuative' perfect. By 'indefinite' we mean on the one hand. He’s been sleeping for two hours. / A: Have you ever in your life seen anyone so entirely delightful? B: Only when I’ve looked in the mirror. in which case we refer to recent indefinite past situations. yet or recently: Has the postman called yet? / They have already had breakfast. Continuative: also with event verbs if in the progressive: e. that the number of occurrences is unspecified and on the other hand. At the same time.Generally. Modes of occurrence: a) general experiential: He has never liked heavy metal. A: And did you visit many places while you were there? B: Yes. A: Have you been to Edinburgh? B: Yes. I have. RESULTATIVE PRESENT PERFECT . before (now): I have never seen such a majestic cathedral before. Jones has played the organ in this church for fifteen years. Since a habit is described as a state consisting of repeated events. Modes of occurrence: a) continuous continuative: I have been sitting in all day. ever.

For generations. The temporal location of such situations is generally mentioned in the second sentence. This last observation relates to another notion . In most cases the alternation of present simple and present perfect bears no significance. (Sparta no longer exists. The presence of the perfect simply places emphasis on the order of the events: I shall leave when I finish / I have finished. / He has recovered from his illness. but even if it is not. there are contexts in which the perfect is obligatory. 'HOT NEWS' PRESENT PERFECT The perfect is often used in newspapers and broadcasts.effect relationship.) The use of either the perfect or the past in the above sentences is to be interpreted pragmatically. once. the simple present is favored.) She was poor all her life. On the other hand. etc. the club announced that it would trade midfielder Ion Radu to second-division club Valcea for two tons of beef and pork. The simple past marks events assigned to a past that is concluded and completely separate from the present. We say You will feel better after you have taken this pill if the pill conditions the well-being of the patient. present perfect and simple past resemble in that both express anteriority to a given moment in time. There is a special use of the present perfect instead of the simple present in adverbial clauses of time referring to the future introduced by after. Consider the following examples of continuative. experiential and habitual perfect: She has been poor all her life. In contrast. in those sentences that are semantically based on the cause . we use the present perfect: Come over and see us when our guests leave / have left. In such cases the present perfect is said to have a future value. whereas Nepal obviously has relevance for the present. thus. Compare: . but our knowledge of the world allows us to employ the appropriate tense. Last week. Sparta produced Greece's greatest warriors. the simple past is still employed at this point in the discourse: The struggling Romanian soccer club Jiul Petrosani has experienced what may be one of the more humiliating moments in recent sports history. with the perfect generates a resultative reading . to introduce 'the latest' events. until.The association of event verb phrases (accomplishments and achievements). The common factor is the inclusion of the present in its analysis.that of Discourse Topic (defined as 'the subject matter under discussion in a certain context'). that presuppose a climax or end point. (Newsweek. What differentiates them is their relation to the present. March 1988) NB. which afterwards are described using the past tense.) For generations. Similarly.) Hannibal brought / *has brought elephants across the Alps. PRESENT PERFECT AND SIMPLE PAST As already stated. let us compare the various uses of the present perfect with the simple past. (Nepal still exists. Bearing this in mind.that is. when the events in the main clause and the subordinate temporally coincide. namely. The resultative meaning does not need the support of time adverbials: He has delivered the parcel. The period referred to is rather assumed than named. the present perfect either involves a period of time lasting up to the present or has results persisting at the present moment. it implies that a transition comes to a final state valid at the present moment. (She is dead. (She is still alive. Discourse topics condition the use of the present perfect in the sense that only those covering a period of time that includes the moment of speaking can be expressed in sentences that employ present perfect. / The plane has landed. when. Nepal has produced the world's greatest soldiers. when the event in the subordinate occurs before the one in the main clause. especially in news reports. we talk about Hannibal or Sparta in the past because we know they no longer exist.

when they describe recent events. "at the pragmatic level. this tense requires the use of a definite time adverbial which locates the respective event at a certain point in the past. English Morphology.e. a clause introduced by when will trigger the use of a past tense in the main clause as well because the subordinate functions as a definite time adverbial: When did you last see him? I haven't seen him since we met at Jane's party. because the time indicated by them is considered to be already given. especially when it appears with recent indefinite past value.Shakespeare has written impressive dramas. I didn't recognize him / *haven't recognized him when I saw him. I've just received word that he isn't coming. perhaps trying to remember what he was doing at the time. As already seen in the analysis of the simple past. the speaker focuses on the moment when he misplaced his gloves.THEN]). they are [+/. 1988). In conclusion. In spite of the differences mentioned so far. indefinite (which are [-THEN]) and those that have both features (that is. definite articles or personal pronouns): I have bought this bag in Cypress Street. resulting in different meanings. while the British say Have you met him yet? or I did it just now vs. discourse topic) is about Shakespeare as a person and his activities. this is used to initiate conversations. the second only with the perfect and the last with both. he came to ask me for money.that is. Their alternation depends on the speaker's viewpoint. (definite time adverbial) I have already talked to him. The present perfect is less used in American English. Since it specifies a definite moment in the past. (the past event is introduced by the perfect) Did you walk the dog? (said between husband and wife who refer to a particular time when the dog is usually walked) Contexts as that supplied by the second example also emphasize a characteristic of the present perfect. Americans tend to say Did you meet him yet?. etc. If there is no time adverbial. . II. The first class combines only with the past. How much did you pay for it? I paid 15 $. adverbial phrases. while in the second he concentrates on the present moment and is only interested in where they are at present. The first sentence is appropriate if the discourse topic is 'great dramatists of the world' or 'impressive dramas in world literature'. *Shakespeare has quarreled with every playwright in London. because such a topic would have relevance for the present moment. vol. adverbial clauses) classify into definite (bearing the feature [+THEN]. a fact which can be evaluated entirely only on the basis of contextual factors" (Ioana Stefanescu. since it is only natural to start conversations indefinitely and then to carry on using definite linguistic expressions (be they the simple past. adverbs. neither of the two sentences is correct since Shakespeare is dead. Naturally. there are contexts in which the two tenses are interchangeable . the present perfect is appropriate in all those uses in which the event described has relevance for the discourse topic. Compare: Where did I put my gloves? to Where have I put my gloves? In the first example. while. TIME ADVERBIALS IN RELATION TO PRESENT PERFECT AND SIMPLE PAST Time adverbials (i. the past tense is expected in (subordinate) clauses of time introduced by when. then 'definiteness' is retrieved by assumption of a particular time from the context or is justified by the preceding use of a past or perfect tense: We met yesterday. The basic difference between present perfect and simple past stems from the contrast definite / indefinite.e. since. But if the discussion (i.

up to now. although they do not make specific reference to it: He went out ten minutes ago. I met him only once when I was in Spain. for now. resulting in different interpretations. ('as early as then') . which most likely occur with the simple past. (uttered at 6. Compare: I haven't read the paper this morning. tonight and all phrases with this (this afternoon / month / year / Christmas / March. must be restricted to a past temporal frame as in: I never liked bananas when I was a child where the time clause supplies the background. having no relation to the present and hence. but if it is a numerical adverb that may contrast with twice or three times.The definite adverbials of time point to a specific moment in the past. ever. they cannot occur with the present perfect (yesterday. a week / month / year ago. / I just saw your sister. when used with the past tense. for instance. but I've seen her this July suggests that it is still July when I utter the sentence.m. etc. We have been very busy so far. still. yet and before occur with the perfect if they mean 'as early / late as now' and with the past if interpreted as 'as early / late as then': I've already heard that piece.) Today.00 p. during these five years. next. etc. for the time being. etc. I've seen the movie only once. Now is mainly associated with present tense: Now my ambition is/has been fulfilled.00. Never. The difference in use between just and just now is the following: just can take either past simple or present perfect: I have just seen your sister. Once appears with the simple past when it means 'on a certain occasion' or 'at one time'.m. after lunch. (uttered at 10. soon. given the appropriate contexts: They haven't spoken to each other for three weeks. for the present.00 a. at 5 o'clock. I saw her this July implies that July is over. ('as early as now') I was already fed up with that piece. as yet. though since . the following adverbials are associated only with the present perfect: since. I left home at 8. They didn't speak to each other for three weeks.) behave in a similar way. so far. hitherto. lately. He hasn't done much work lately. always combine with both tenses.) I didn't read the paper this morning. The third group of adverbials allows the use of both the perfect and the past. I saw him on Sunday morning. while just now is interpreted as a moment/second/minute ago and occurs only with the past tense: I saw your sister just now. again depending on the context. there is the class of unanchored adverbs of the type in the evening. It is interesting to notice that. the 'never' period. but then they made up. for phrases occur with both the perfect and the past. Apart from them. Already. then. before now: I haven't been able to talk to him since I last saw him at the mall.00 and got here at 12. it may be used with both tenses: I was happy once in this house. The difference lies in whether the event is viewed simply as a factor of experience obtaining at the moment of speech (with the present perfect) or within the context of the time at which it occurred (with past simple). on Monday. But it may also be a substitute for then and thus occur with past tense: Now my ambition was fulfilled.phrases cannot be used with the simple past. last night / Tuesday / week / month / year. On the other hand.).

imperfect. The past perfect can be substituted with the simple past. past perfect has three values: continuative. / She said she went/had gone to the market the day before. I had finished washing the clothes and I’d gone to bed early. perfect compus. By the time they went to dig it up. in which case past simple sets the scene and past perfect expresses what had happened before: That morning I was quite content. the past perfect occurs in both main and subordinate clauses introduced by when. before. THE PERFECT PROGRESSIVE FORMS . (b) it is seen as a past tense that expresses past anteriority . [-then] Susan knew John had left at 5. In conclusion. On the other hand. By Friday they had already found a way to get rid of her. until.PAST PERFECT Past perfect may appear with both [+then] and [-then] adverbials. As already exemplified in the sentences above. Now I was anxious to go to school. after. resultative and experiential: Jim had dislocated his shoulder. she had already hidden it in a new place. She said she had laid the table. In Indirect Speech. [+then] Moreover. past perfect has two dimensions: (a) it parallels the semantics of present perfect. She said the show had finished two minutes before. past perfect may appear in narrative contexts. (experiential) In Indirect Speech. / *She said Lily was there. in which case it is said to have a pre-preterite value. There are three reasons for which we attribute this value to past perfect: (a) its co-occurrence with [+then] adverbials (b) the fact that it is the equivalent of past simple in Direct Speech. NB. / She said Lily had been there. he landed a very important job . Mai mult ca perfect: always past perfect Past perfect: mai mult ca perfect. In this sense. The show finished two minutes ago. I had written the essay the previous evening. which acquires a past perfect meaning: When he came back from the States. past perfect is optional: Yesterday I went to the market. then past perfect is obligatory: Lily was here. However. etc. unlike present perfect which combines only with [+/-then] and [-then] adverbials: They had been there since 5. past perfect is the tense we obtain if in Direct Speech we have present perfect or past simple: I have laid the table. (continuative) I had watched United lose twice that season. again unlike present perfect. if the verb expresses an event. in some cases the substitution is semantically impossible: When he had read the letter / *when he read the letter. past perfect describes a past event that takes place before another past event or past moment: They found out where she had buried the treasure. (c) the fact that it can be used in narratives to tell ‘a story within a story’. like present perfect. by the time. If the verb expresses a state. (resultative) He had been at work for more than two hours. NB. he burned it.

1988. it is in the very nature of predictions to describe what might happen in the future. Thus. for instance. quite often it is implied that the respective activity has just stopped: You've been walking too fast.that is. it is no surprise that almost all the linguistic forms that express future time belong. conveying 'irritation': You've been asking for money over and over again. Again. it may imply that the effects of a certain action are still apparent at present. in fact. That's why you're tired. non-factual states of affairs. event verb phrases (accomplishments and achievements) turn into processes and the completion / result meaning is suspended. It's time he woke the simple present tense combined with a future time adverbial. the only linguistic form that denotes a future event and has temporal sense alone .e. Apart from the simple present. The activity described by the verbal form does not necessarily carry on at present. which have not happened yet and therefore merely translate into potential. we can express intentions. and these situations describe our attitude towards possible. possible courses of action. etc. Apart from these meanings. contain a future time implication: 1) Present Tense Simple 2) Present Tense Continuous 3) Be Going To 4) Future Tense Simple 5) Future Tense Continuous 6) Future Perfect (Simple and Continuous) PRESENT TENSE SIMPLE . take place tomorrow. the semelfactives) acquire an iterative meaning: She's been knocking at my window for two minutes. Finally. even the most confident prognostication must indicate something of one speaker's attitude and so be tinged with modality" (Ioana Stefanescu. Therefore.It should be stated from the beginning that the use of the continuous aspect with the perfect forms is similar to the interaction of this aspect with other tense forms. it is certainly not the case of future events. Non-durative process verbs phrases (i. it does not reflect any attitude on the part of the speaker . the perfect progressive also carries an emotive reading. it is a matter that depends rather on the aspectual class of the verb phrase. promises or threats that we mean to carry out in the future. In fact. we can predict what will happen. there are five other linguistic forms that. English Morphology II. beside their basic modal or aspectual quality. It is only natural for future events / states to have modal or aspectual implications since "we cannot be as certain of future happenings as we are of events past and present. state verb phrases of the locative type in the progressive develop a 'temporary or limited duration' meaning: I have been living in this castle for weeks now. Compare: I have pumped up three tires. MEANS OF EXPRESSING FUTURITY If present and past situations are conceived of as facts. Process verb phrases in the present perfect have the tendency to appear in the progressive as well. 302). to the sphere of modality or to the aspectual paradigm. When combined with the progressive. (The job is completed) I have been pumping up tires in the garage for the last quarter of an hour. hence. When they do. are modal verbs denoting predictions. all epistemic uses of the modal verbs refer to people's present attitudes with respect to the future time sphere: The meeting can / may / must / shall / will. Epistemic will and shall. the continuous aspect simply reinforces the idea of continuity of an activity: He's been sleeping since ten o'clock. on the contrary. plans. Actually. and for this reason. they are used to express future events. pp. (I haven't finished the job yet) Although the perfect progressive never refers to a 'present result'.

the simple present in main clauses denotes future facts. begin. therefore. this does not mean that there are no present progressive sentences referring to the remote future. the continuous present signals a future event anticipated by virtue of a present plan.made by official authorities. mostly in the near future. If we consider that the simple present with future value describes a definite occasion in the future in the same way the simple past refers to a definite occasion in the past.00 tomorrow to prepare breakfast for the kids. arrive. I'm joining the fire brigade. generally aiming at the near rather than the distant future. the second example sounds absurd because the sunrise can't be planned. and thus is always accompanied by a future time expression: Are you going to the auction tomorrow? Yes. / We leave for Brasov tomorrow morning. We attribute to such sentences the same degree of certainty we would attribute to present or past events. . while the going to form is used in a wider variety of contexts and not necessarily with a time adverbial. a court of law. depart. Future events expressed by means of the simple present are assumed to take place without fail. On the other hand. In the first example we interpret Hillary as the agent who has deliberately made this plan.' Similarly. In contrast. in fact. involving conscious human agency. but I'm not going to buy anything.As already discussed in the chapter on the values of the simple present.00 tomorrow. end. not as a prediction. The reasoning behind such structures would be: "If X is a fact. etc. this tense denotes the future either in subordinate clauses of time and condition or in main clauses. go. Therefore. / School starts on Monday / next week. However. program or arrangement. since they express an arrangement or an intention. being generally accompanied by a future time adverbial. etc. come. in a narrative sequence). There is an entire range of verbs commonly used in such contexts. set off. Compare: Hillary is rising at 6. When I grow up. The continuous present with future value is close in meaning to the going to form. not possible future events. we might say that the simple present with future value presents the highest degree of certainty as to the occurrence of a certain action in the future. Since such arrangements are supposed to be unalterable. I'm going. it is easy to understand why they are normally collective or impersonal . unless reference time is provided by the context (like. The verbs that enter such constructions are generally verbs of 'doing'. which is. *The sun is rising at 6. then I predict Y. like statements about the calendar. the suggestion of imminence of these constructions. it is determined by natural law. schedules or organized events: start. for instance. reinforced by the presence of the purpose clause 'to prepare breakfast for the kids'. He's getting married in September. programs or itineraries regarded as immutable: Tomorrow is Friday. leave. committees. verbs associated with announcements about timetables. the present continuous refers only to very definite arrangements. it is obvious that the continuous present with future value will not combine with state verbs normally incompatible with the progressive aspect. PRESENT TENSE CONTINUOUS When used with future value. hence. we have an explanation for the obligatory presence of the future time adverbial in such sentences. constructions with the simple present describing a future event are restricted to certain areas. The presence of the simple present instead of a will / shall construction in the subordinate is justified by the fact that the situation contained in this clause is taken as a given fact. they exist in as far as we make reference to remote future events determined in advance: I'm taking Mary shopping tomorrow. At the same time.

again. Though its nature brings it closer to the idea of imminence. express their intentions. Going to can be paraphrased by intend. The kind of verbs admitted in such structures are. The second meaning of going to . thus. There's going to be a riot in this village. going to can be used to refer to periods remote from the moment of speaking: I am going to be a teacher when I grow less restrictive both in point of subject choice and choice of verb class. we employ the going to form. a sentence like It's going to rain would be uttered if the speaker saw black clouds already gathering in the gloomy sky. I'm having lunch with Jim tomorrow. It is only the second sentence that the speaker could offer as an excuse for not joining a friend for a game of snooker. I forgot. The second sentence refers to an arrangement already made in the past. What are you going to do with the money? I've reminded you once. In all the above examples the underlying assumption is that factors already at work at present are inevitably leading to a certain future state of affairs. or at least animate subjects endowed with will that can. BE GOING TO The general meaning attached to this linguistic form is that of 'future fulfillment of the present'. Going to with the first meaning is restricted to human. Very often either of the two can be used. I think I'm going to cry. I'll telephone for them now.that of 'future fulfillment of present cause' . Are you going to redecorate your kitchen? You look frozen. and when it is clearly unpremeditated we use will + infinitive: I've hired a typewriter and I am going to learn to type. this extends to two more specific meanings: 'future fulfillment of present intention' and "future fulfillment of present cause'. hence the implication that both the speaker and Jim know about it.We might consider that there is a slight difference of emphasis between the two structures in a pair like: I'm going to have lunch with Jim tomorrow. Thus. the subject can be either animate or inanimate and the expression can occur with both 'agentive' and 'non-agentive' / 'state' verbs: She is going to have a baby next month. I'm going to participate in the board meeting tomorrow is distinct from I intend to participate in the board meeting tomorrow in the sense that the former has a higher degree of certainty. We should distinguish between the going to expressing intention and the will + infinitive construction having the same meaning. It's going to rain. yet. A lot of paint was delivered here today. I'm not going to do it again. verbs of 'doing' ('agentive' verbs) that imply conscious exercise of the will. and not state verbs: The detective is going to ask you a few questions. when the intention is clearly premeditated. . but with a slight difference in meaning. For instance. The first sentence reflects the speaker's present state of mind and it may well be the case that Jim has no idea about the speaker's plan. Did you remember to book seats? / Oh no. the expectation that this will happen is stronger than in the latter. Sit down by the fire and I'll make you some tea.

etc. in everyday conversation the listener will use other means of expressing such future events. I'm sure / I suppose they won't agree to our project. Birds will start to sing when spring comes. counseling patience. think. believe. The future simple is mainly present in newspapers and on TV in news broadcasts when formal announcements or announcements about the weather are made. refusals. in which case the main clause contains the future structure and the subordinate employs a simple present (see chapter on the values of the simple present): If I throw this plate against the wall. they can express promises. hurry and eat it before it cools. If the first sentence makes a prediction. Reader: The Queen is visiting / is going to visit the southern part of the country tomorrow. modal verbs that express prediction. 'Current orientation' going to contrasts with prediction will to the extent that the going to form carries this sense of inevitability.Bearing this in mind. but for convenience shall and will combined with the bare infinitive are designated as future tense simple. expect. perhaps. Shall has a neutral predictive meaning only when used with the first person singular or plural: I shall never have the opportunity to thank him. I expect the train will be late. Shall / will with predictive meaning appear in various contexts. etc. In American English it is used in formal contexts: We shall never surrender to the terrorists. . in fact. it will smash into pieces. The soup is going to cool soon. Compare: The soup will cool soon. the second should be interpreted as a warning for the addressee to. it is easy to understand why going to refers to the immediate future and is also named 'current orientation' be going to: Look out! The glass is going to fall! ('I can see it already tottering'). threats. etc. FUTURE TENSE SIMPLE There is no future tense in modern English. He'll be there by tomorrow.): Perhaps I'll find another teacher after this. They are also specific of sentences with subordinates of condition and time. Shall and will are. Those verbs not normally used in the progressive will combine with the simple future: verbs of perception. In fact. cognitive verbs. You'll have plenty of time to finish your book. They may express the speaker's opinions. speculations and assumptions about the future (used after verbs such as doubt. therefore something that involves the speaker's judgment and is directly related to the future time sphere. hope. They'll find out about your plans tonight. Students must take into account the fact that shall and will also have other modal meanings (see chapter on Modal Verbs). I will know him when I see him. verbs of possession. such as the going to form or the present continuous for plans: Newspaper: The Queen will visit the southern part of the country tomorrow. and still refer to a future event.

We can make even a further distinction between the two if we compare: I'm giving a lesson at 3. they simply suggest a prediction. The first example suggests that he has deliberately arranged a meeting with the doctor. again in the future. The gardener won't be cutting the grass for some time. In fifty years' time we'll be living entirely on pills. the opposition is between a future with intention and a future without intention. there is no point in saying *it will rain without mentioning when it will happen. as I've got a lot of other jobs for him to do first.m. Compare: I'll phone mum and tell her about your plans. Apart from these normal uses. we can contrast future tense continuous with the will + infinitive construction as well as their negative counterparts. tomorrow. in the future) or to a temporary arrangement. He'll be seeing the doctor tomorrow. He says that it is perfectly all right as it is. future tense continuous has a special meaning that applies to a single event viewed in its entirety and not as going on at a point around which it creates a temporal frame. The first sentence states that the lesson will begin at the time mentioned. tomorrow. shall / will + infinitive does not appear without a time adverbial for obvious reasons. FUTURE TENSE CONTINUOUS As it combines with the progressive aspect. the modals in themselves do not express future time. while won't be cutting suggests that the gardener's program requires otherwise.00 p. they'll be changing the guard in a minute and you'll get a good view. in both cases. in the second example the speaker implies that the talk on the phone will take place either as a matter of routine or for reasons that have nothing to do with the interlocutor's plans. As already mentioned. It is the adverbial that places this prediction in time. I'll be phoning mum and I'll tell her about your plans. future tense continuous matches the patterns of the present or past continuous: This time next week I'll be teaching them grammar. The gardener won't cut down the tree.Generally. I'll be giving a lesson at 3. When I get home my dog will be sitting at the door waiting for me. It suggests that the event predicted by shall / will will occur independently of the will of the people involved in it as part of the ordinary course of events or as a matter of routine. otherwise the sentence is factually empty. There is a contrast between future tense continuous and present tense continuous with future value: He is seeing the doctor tomorrow. volition or plan.m.e. this structure will naturally refer either to an activity in progress at a specific point in time (i. I'll be working in there next week. That is why this tense has been labeled 'future-as-a-matter-of-course': Stand here. In this respect. won't cut denotes a refusal. Thus. . whereas the second suggests that the lesson may have already begun and is in progress at the respective time. On the other hand. I'd better move the computer in my room. In the first sentence the speaker announces a deliberate future action that will occur as a result of his wishes. This use eliminates any idea of intention.00 p. while the second example implies that their meeting is part of the ordinary course of events (perhaps they work or do business together). Similarly.

On October 21st they will have been married for twenty-five years. The police will have heard of the theft by this time. which are both formal (to be to. of course. to be near to. to be ready to. (continuous action) By the end of the month he will have been teaching students for a year. On the other hand. but rather on the continuity of the action. FUTURE PERFECT TENSE SIMPLE / CONTINUOUS These structures are used to denote future events that take place before other future events or before a certain future moment. They were leaving town the next day. Idioms such as 'You'll be losing your head one of these days' or 'Whatever will he be doing next?' suggesting comic exasperation. This happens either in narratives or when applying indirect / reported speech rules: He was going to tell her what we had done.In interrogative constructions. bearing no imposition on the part of the speaker: Will you please take the dog out for a walk? (request) Will you be taking the dog out for a walk? (question only) Since they are more polite and more tactful and do not put pressure on the addressee. violent or abnormal events. would is preferred in literary style. When the focus does not concentrate on the result. they occur with a time expression beginning with by: By the end of the term I will have read all the twelve volumes. If be going to is considered the most common form used to express future in the past. In He is to return to England tomorrow the most likely meaning is that he . to be about to and to be due to) and colloquial (to be on the point of. OTHER FUTURE TIME EXPRESSIONS There are other ways of referring to the future. It cannot describe sudden. (repeated action) Future perfect can also be used to express an assumption on the part of the speaker: You won't have heard the news. the use of future tense continuous renders the question neutral. Still. To be to is similar in meaning to have to / ought to and describes formal arrangements made as a result of an order / command. Generally. a request or a command. as they cannot be interpreted as part of a routine: * The terrorists will be killing the President tomorrow. FUTURE -IN-THE-PAST FORMS In case sentences have a past time axis. She said she would call me later that week. there are restrictions in the use of this linguistic form. this use has been speculated in colloquial English with humorous or ironic effects. all the future time expressions are modified according to the change of context and indicate future in the past situations. we use the progressive form: By the end of the day I will have been working for ten hours. will + infinitive can express an invitation. are quite common in everyday speech. such structures have become more frequent in every day conversation. to be on the verge of / on the brink of).

command. Modal verbs are a syntactically defined subset of auxiliary verbs with specific properties: . it suggests possibility. compulsion. (deontic should combines with the continuous infinitive to suggest an action in progress at the moment of speaking) You ought to have paid closer attention to your guests. To be about to and to be on the point of both refer to imminent actions and the former is used to replace the more colloquial going to in formal contexts: I think the play is about to start now.inversion with the subject (May I borrow your car?) . He can play the violin. order. impossibility.the rational laws of deduction – probability. / I am just on the point of proposing to her. MODAL VERBS Modality refers to notions like possibility. impossibility. To be due to refers to scheduled times: The ceremony is due to begin in ten minutes. The difference in meaning is reflected in their different syntactic behaviors.) Modals are polysemous words. Epistemic forms co-occur with the continuous infinitive to suggest an action in progress and with the perfect infinitive for past time reference and have no restrictions on the subject. we experience certain states of affairs in the real world.the social or institutional laws . do not occur with the perfect infinitive and their subject is always [+ human].no non-finite forms such as infinitives. Though it proves to be a very felicitous distinction.m. (deontic ought to combines with the perfect infinitive to suggest past time reference) CAN / COULD . *musted) . necessity. it will be noticed later that the rule holds true only for the most important modal verbs (may. permission.epistemic sense: possibility. appropriateness etc.deontic (root) sense: ability. vs. unlike the latter.negative with not (You can’t throw plates at him!) . / His flight is due at 7. can and must). anatomy authority/institution or one's social status according to which you have or you don’t have authority over somebody else. certainty. May in a sentence like You may go now. When it denotes an official arrangement or plan.3rd person: defective (compare: I can play the piano. whereas in He may be there already. The less developed modals do not observe it: You should be listening to what your sister is saying.has received explicit order to go back there. . it is similar to the simple present with future value. biology. these modalities refer to co-occurrence (*I must can do it. The chairman of the board meets union officials tonight. Modal verbs evince two basic meanings: . Deontic forms do not take the progressive. referring to modalities that define the notion of physical and intellectual ability/capacity. The problem of polysemy: there is a syntactic approach based on the idea that the distinct meanings of the same modal are reflected in their distinct distribution. but then we imagine that things are different and in this way we talk about possible worlds. past or present participles (*to may. chemistry.the natural laws of physics. *canning. except that. possibility. duty . indicates permission. it can retain its future meaning even when it is not accompanied by a future time adverbial: The chairman of the board is to meet union officials (tonight). impossibility . There are 3 general systems of principles that can be invoked when we talk about modality: .35 a.) .

the use of can suggests that 'you have permission' rather than 'I give you permission'.now) Can is used in parallel with a synonymous expression having a fuller range of forms . we encounter the opposite phenomenon. hear. could is used to express a habitual or recurrent event in the past. In contrast. In interrogations the use of can to request permission is simply a matter of courtesy. (El stie sa vorbeasca engleza.DEONTIC CAN Deontic can expresses physical or mental ability. Maybe we can go fishing next week. Compare: He could play the piano very well when he was a child. be it written or spoken. . and Auzi cum sufla vantul?). when making a decision at the moment of speaking about some event in the future. In other words. (generic) When he moved closer to the painting. there is no rule or law that prevents you from performing a certain action. Ability in the future is expressed by means of either can or the periphrastic shall/will be able to with a difference in meaning. referring to potential acts. he was able to / *he could see that it was a fake. Deontic can has two past forms: could and was / were able to. In formal and polite English. can is like an aspectual marker (often not translated): I see the swallows flying up the sky. However. Similarly. . understand.general permanent ability) Look. couldn’t will always imply that the event didn’t take place. the hearer is not usually in a position to deny permission: Can I leave now? / Can I have the salt? Negative sentences use either cannot or may not to refuse permission: . smell. though this context does not rule out the use of can: Mary has now recovered from her illness and is able to / can go to school. Do you hear the wind blowing? / Can you hear the wind blowing? Each pair of sentences has the same translation (Vad randunelele zburand sus pe cer. describing generic ability. unlike may which is employed when an authority gives you permission. remember. (sarcastic suggestion). There is no difference between could and to be able to in negative sentences. In this respect. Apart from replacing can in contexts for which the modal has no forms. (particular) On the other hand. not real ones. Was/were able to refers to the actual performance of a single successful achievement. can is commonly used with verbs of perception ( be able to. To be able to is never used when referring to something going on at the moment of speaking (see example above). He can speak English. May replaces can in all contexts. (Pot sa inot. / He can be nasty. / Frenchmen can be arrogant. feel) and cognitive verbs of the type believe. Permission can has an additional pragmatic interpretation in sentences like: You can forget about your holiday. being perceived as the more respectable form. The second meaning of deontic can is that of permission. I can / *am able to swim. / I can see the swallows flying up in the sky. You can go home when you have finished writing your essay. and in certain contexts we do distinguish between the uses of the two. To be able to refers to some event that will be possible in the future. to be able to has a specific meaning. Compare: Old man: You can park here as far as I know. However. we use can: I hope they will be able to book seats for the concert tomorrow. Can is more widely employed than 'permission' may in colloquial English. Policeman: You may park here. (strong recommendation) or You can jump in the lake if you feel like it. When used with verbs of physical perception can actualizes the reference of the verb. Can is also often used to express sporadic ability or an irregular pattern of behavior: She can be quite catty. To be able to is preferred when referring to a specific achievement. taste.

Roughly speaking. Can he be reading in the library? He can't be reading in the library. For past time reference may is replaced by to be allowed to. the second seems to be more forceful because it is interpreted as positively forbidding an action instead of negatively refusing permission. (internal negation) (it is possible that he does not arrive in time) For past time reference epistemic can combines with the perfect infinitive like any other epistemic modal: He can't have had time to hide the evidence. the second sentence should be taken more seriously because it does not refer to a mere possibility that has occurred to the speaker. While cannot expresses the impossibility of some action to occur (appearing in cases of external negation). EPISTEMIC CAN Epistemic can expresses the possibility/impossibility of an action to take place. Unfortunately. he could join us. if he wanted.You may not leave yet. (It is possible to devalue the dollar. In questions. with the approval of the Minister. in formal English may seems to be used to express both factual and theoretical possibility.factual possibility) When uttered. receive from persons to which advice is given under this section… such charges. It is more frequent in negations and interrogations. . the modal has present time reference. . Compare: The dollar can be devalued. (external negation) (it is not possible that he saw the light of the car) He may not arrive in time. such as a time of financial crisis. so the distinction persists only in colloquial English. but the verb inside has past time reference. Since the example above refers specifically to the powers a certain official is endowed with. being similar to must. (if any) as the authority consider reasonable. whereas in affirmative sentences may is preferred: He may be reading in the library.theoretical possibility) The dollar may be devalued. (It is possible that the dollar is devalued. (I oblige you no to talk loudly in this auditorium) Though both sentences represent prohibitions. its semantic content accounts for the presence of permission may. theoretical possibility. not the speaker's. whereas in reported speech might is used: I was eventually allowed to go abroad to visit my relatives. but to a real contingency. MAY / MIGHT DEONTIC MAY Deontic may is used to grant or give permission when the speaker has the authority to do so (see comparison to permission can above). Could he have spread that vicious rumor about the twins? In this case. The nurse said we might speak to the patient. Permission may is also present in rules and regulations in formal English: A local health authority may. may not suggests the possibility of something not happening (illustrating cases of internal negation): If he saw a light it can’t have been the light of the car. / She said that. we can establish a distinction between can and may in affirmative sentences if we conceive of them in terms of the opposition factual vs. the speaker uses either may not or must not if the authority prohibits some action (You may not visit that family. may signals the hearer's authority. . (I do not permit you to leave…) You mustn't talk loudly in this auditorium. When permission is denied. There is no past time for permission can with the exception of could used as a past tense form in reported speech: He said I could leave the next day. / You must not speak to her again!).

a sentence like A friend may betray you is interpreted more like a warning about a particular friend. When employed with its deontic meaning. Try as he may. the speaker says what somebody else requires or it can point to the speaker who is in some position of authority and imposes a duty. may / might refer to events in the past: He may have already discovered the secret of that tomb. the speaker imposes something on himself through a sense of duty or self-discipline. and hence. The university says: These people must be expelled if they disrupt lectures. so that we talk about selfcompulsion. He can't have already discovered the secret of that tomb. Must has either neutral reference when. (the speaker is in authority) When we consider the first person singular or plural (I must / we must). In a sentence like A friend can betray you it is suggested that friends sometimes do that. focusing primarily on specific situations. In this respect. it resembles 'permission' may. where can is preferred. In this case the truth of the sentence or its falsity can be verified. I might just start to trust you. May / might as well expresses the idea that there is no alternative left to a bad situation: We might as well give up now because we don't stand a chance if we fight against them. he can never remember people's names. using may for present reference and might for past reference: Try as I might. but this doesn't give you the right to be rude. MUST. . it is simply directed towards the speaker himself. As already suggested.factual possibility opposition disappears. the theoretical . this doesn't give you the right to be rude.EPISTEMIC MAY As already mentioned above. I might well decide to come. (external obligation .the teacher wants the essays tomorrow morning) Have to / have got to have either neutral or external orientation as to the source of obligation: I’ve got to be at London airport at 4. epistemic may is used to express possibility. HAVE (GOT) TO DEONTIC MUST / HAVE (GOT) TO The relationship between must and have to parallels that between may and can in both their deontic and epistemic meanings. May / might combines with several adverbs that emphasize the modal expression with both present and past time reference. (neutral) You must return all the books to the library by Friday.) May with the sense of 'possibility' also appears in concessive clauses in colloquial English as an alternative to an although clause: You may be in charge. epistemic may does not occur in interrogative sentences. can basically focuses on general situations. Also. there is an idiomatic expression with try. we notice that the idea of compulsion is not lost. must expresses obligation. I couldn't push the door open. You have to make up a plan before you start. When combined with the perfect infinitive. Although you are in charge.I have my own program and I want to stick to it) I have to finish writing the essay by tonight. for instance. For instance. (internal obligation . (NB. On the other hand. This contrasts with the use of have to (I have to / we have to) which suggests that some external authority imposes the duty: I must finish writing the essay by tonight.

(the event took place) As already seen. necessity is questioned in: Have you got to do it? / Do you have to do it? / Need I say more? There seems to be a difference between do you have to and have you got to in the sense that the former has a habitual or iterative meaning. Have to also expresses logical necessity: There has to be someone who knows the truth about his disappearance. whereas the have to example expresses a downright accusation. it suggests that the possibility of the opposite state of affairs cannot be conceived of. the evidence is such as to imply the truth of the sentence. while the latter refers to a specific occasion. *having got to). have to is used for past time reference replacing must. I don't see any explanation for the crash. have to is stronger than must in the sense that it does not refer to a mere assumption or deduction. In American English have got to has acquired an epistemic interpretation: AE You’ve got to be joking. unlike have to: We’d got to make a trip to York anyway so it didn’t matter too much. it is the hearer’s authority that is involved. Subject-oriented must needs no past tense (must is different from have to only in the present). the speaker pretends to interpret the hearer's need to smoke as something he cannot control rather than as a nasty habit he enjoys practicing. Have got to is rarer in the past and does not imply that the event referred to took place.) Someone has to be hiding the truth. go to the window. which is again extremely ironical. Oh. have got to is characteristic of colloquial British English and is more restricted in use because of its lack of nonfinite forms (*will have got to. Shall/will have to is used if there is a suggestion that the necessity is future or conditioned: I shall have to keep silent for an hour. The negative counterpart of epistemic must is can’t . whereas needn't or don't have to negate the necessity (external negation): You mustn’t reveal what I’ve said. WILL / WOULD DEONTIC WILL / WOULD VOLITION WILL . (It is impossible for everyone to be telling the truth. Like the other modals must is used for future events: We must do something about it tomorrow. Must appears as such with past time reference only in reported speech: She said she must/had to go.can situation: Someone must be hiding the truth. The must example above is interpreted as a simple suspicion. not the speaker’s: Must I sweep the floor and wash the dishes myself? (= Are these your orders?) There is an even more restricted use of must in interrogatives with 'you' as subject that conveys a note of sarcasm: Must you really smoke those horrible cigars? In a sentence like If you must smoke. Again the difference between epistemic must and epistemic have to is that between factual necessity and theoretical necessity. For past time reference must combines with the perfect infinitive like all the other epistemic modals: He must have been flying too low. paralleling the may . When must is used in interrogative as well as in conditional clauses. You have to have made some mistake here./ BE You must be joking. / We’ll have to go out if you’re going to do it. having to). (You are not obliged to answer that question. Consider: Do you have to be at school at 8 o'clock? (Is this what you have to do every day?) Have you got to be at school at 8 o'clock? (Is this what you have to do tomorrow morning?) In negative sentences must not negates the event indicating the obligation not to perform some action (internal negation). (it was necessary…) We had to make a trip to York to collect the bloody thing.Students have to be careful with their grades. While have to is used in formal language and has non-finite forms (will have to. (I oblige you not to reveal what I've said) You needn’t answer that question.the “natural expression of impossibility”: She must be over 40. she can’t. you get to knowledge by inference or reasoning. Otherwise.) EPISTEMIC MUST / HAVE (GOT) TO Epistemic must expresses logical necessity. (It is impossible that everyone is telling the truth. Otherwise.) Thus.

) HABITUAL WILL Habitual will refers to a situation that takes place regularly or frequently as a consequence of a natural tendency of a person or an object: . I won’t have my name on the title page. *I asked him and he would come. strong volitional will is never contracted to 'll and always stressed in speech. don't complain that she's avoiding you. The idea of willingness is commonly related to second . POWER WILL Power will expresses properties of certain objects. it expresses a strong refusal: They won’t give me a key. so I can’t work. why will you keep asking stupid questions? If you will ask her out every time you see her. I asked him but he wouldn’t come. Strong volitional will shows one's determination or intention to do something: I will see him today if that's what I want! 'I won't do it!' / 'Yes. power will employs inanimate subjects and is subject-oriented (the source of power is intrinsic to the subject of will): The hall will seat five hundred. The third type of intermediate will occurs mainly with the first person expressing a promise or a threat and is usually contracted: I will pay him back for what he's done to me! We'll cut your allowance if you refuse to listen to us! We'll see about that when he returns.person requests of the type: Will you bring me a glass of water? Who will tell me what I've done wrong? In such questions will is a polite variant of the imperative for the 2nd and the 3rd persons. Instead. For past time reference we use power would. You know that certain drugs will improve your condition. But she loves him and she won’t leave him. For past time reference with subject-oriented will the form would is NOT used if there is an accomplished interpretation for the event. When volitional will is negated. how they characteristically behave. The door won’t open. Unlike volition will whose subject is always a person or at least an animal endowed with willpower. Since it has such an emphatic meaning. you will. I shall have a cake. being more conditional than will. honey. but wouldn’t is normal. Would in such questions is even more polite: Would you kindly tell me … / Would you be good enough… / Would you like to …? This type of volition will is also present in conditional clauses in the second and third persons: If you will say so. volitional be willing to is more likely: I asked him and he was willing to come. I shan’t be happy unless she will come. Volitional would is used in adverbial clauses of condition and after wish. which parallels volition would but retains an inanimate subject (She asked if the table would bear.Volition will relates to either willingness (weak volition) or insistence (strong volition) or intention (intermediate volition).' Sandy. The last two examples that employ second and third persons clearly imply that the speaker is exasperated at the interlocutors' stubbornness.

Shall I go? represents an offer to go (Do you want me to go?) Used with the second person shall describes a situation which is independent of the will of the person addressed. She’ll be sleeping now. Epistemic will is like epistemic must in the sense that the conclusion is reached on the basis of the evidence available. we infer that John is in his office).A falling drop will hollow a stone. Should has present and future reference. it is the will of the speaker who imposes an obligation. In interrogations that employ the first person the speaker inquires about the wish or will of the addressee. Generally speaking must could replace will in all the examples above with only a slight difference in meaning as to the degree of certainty of the respective prediction: John must be in his office. John will be in his office. John will have received the book by this time. EPISTEMIC WILL / WOULD Epistemic will is related to the idea of probability. You shall never hear from me again. Shall you see John today? When shall you do it? Deontic should is a weaker equivalent of deontic shall. (I can see the lights on). A cat will often play with a mouse before killing it. in the Bible and in legal statements or rules: He shall be punished if he does not obey. That will be John at the door. that is why used to can combine with both state and activity verbs. for past reference combining with the perfect infinitive and acquiring a contrary-to-fact interpretation: You should pay more attention to what I'm telling you right now. If there is reference to a past situation. it is distinct from will you? which inquires about the other person’s will or willingness. Boys will be boys. unlike would whose usage is restricted to activity verbs only: He used to live in that house in those days. SHALL / SHOULD DEONTIC SHALL / SHOULD The deontic meaning of shall is that of obligation. . can suggest either a promise or a threat on the part of the speaker. You shall receive a reward if you follow my advice. therefore. In modern English we use must. however. not the will of the subject of the sentence ( shall is speaker-oriented). shall is an archaic form of order still present in fairy tales. He would (often) buy strawberries in those days / whenever she came. then we use will in combination with the perfect infinitive: This will be the National Gallery. This imperious kind of shall. the sense of obligation being rendered in the form of a suggestion or piece of advice. For past time reference we employ either would or used to with the difference that used to does not have the sense of an iterated situation. used with second and third person subjects. the inference concerning the present time as it involves a present situation. (from previous knowledge why the lights were on. The first condition of legal justice is that it shall hold the balance impartially.

It is used for assumptions about present or past situations (if combined with the perfect infinitive): The plane should be landing now.If I could have my way. he really intends to go slowly. Assumptions with epistemic should are less confident than assumptions with epistemic will. denoting obligation or duty. when used with a first person subject. he implies that he isn't going to go slowly. The general meaning of epistemic shall is that ‘someone /something is disposed towards something’. whereas He will have finished by now suggests that 'I am sure he has finished'. again its meaning is related to that of epistemic must: Susan ought to be at her office now. NEED / NEED TO . Susan must be at her office now. The parcel should have arrived by now. ought to represents a tentative counterpart of must and shall. Moreover. but if he says I must go slowly here. The ought to variant reflects the speaker's cautiousness in asserting that as he also takes into account that there is a slight possibility that something unexpected might have happened to require her presence somewhere else. You should have told me that you were hungry. If a driver says I ought to go slowly here. DEONTIC OUGHT TO Deontic ought to is similar in meaning to must. of which perhaps not one shall fall upon fertile ground and grow into a fair plant. unlike must.) You ought to give some money to your sister. For past time reference ought to selects the perfect infinitive: You ought to have been more careful with the children. The must variant reflects the speaker's certainty that his deduction is correct. Who touches pitch shall be defiled. 1983) Epistemic should is considered the conditional equivalent of epistemic shall. in fact. (But. OUGHT TO Very close in interpretation to should. (I am sure you will. you should be sent to Siberia for what you've done. since there is evidence that leads him to the respective conclusion. the implication is that the obligation will not be fulfilled. EPISTEMIC OUGHT TO Epistemic ought to expresses potential probability. (Perkins. the use of ought to implies that the speaker is not very certain the addressee will perform his duty. He should have finished by now means that 'I expect he has finished by now'. We may say He ought to go but he won’t but an utterance like He must go but *he won’t is impossible. ought to gives the possibility of non-action. you didn't) EPISTEMIC SHALL / SHOULD Shall is interpreted epistemically when its modal base is the system of rational laws and where the empirical evidence implies the truth of the sentence: A flower shall produce thousands of seeds. Compare: You must give some money to your sister. with a single difference: while must suggests that the speaker is confident the interlocutor will do as told. (But I don't know whether you will or not) Hence.

When we refer to a past situation. which means 'I suppose': I daresay the plane will be delayed. consequently. They differ in that the former implies that the action does take place. sometimes with little or no hope or faith. but as formed in the mind of the speaker as a desire. relating facts to moments in real time. sometimes with more or less hope of realization. the speaker expresses indignation at the actions of the interlocutor: How dare you shout at me? At the same time. THE SUBJUNCTIVE MOOD Whereas the indicative expresses facts and is closely related to reality. thus resembling shouldn't have and oughtn't have in as far as in all three cases the event does take place: You needn't have carried all this luggage by yourself. Modal need doesn’t occur in ‘affirmative’ sentences. lexical dare has an additional meaning ('to challenge') if used transitively and followed by object + full infinitive: Somebody dared me to jump off the bridge into the river. and only rarely in statements. with more or less belief.Although they are close in meaning. Lexical need occurs with a (passive) infinitive or a noun / pronoun object or a gerund: I need to know what time you'll get home. Yet. I didn't have / need to pick up Mary from school because she phoned me saying she would walk home. while the latter implies that as a consequence of this lack of necessity. it indicates a theoretically possible or potential course of events that the world may take. The gas tank needs to be refilled / refilling. scarcely or only: I need hardly mention how grateful I am for this opportunity. / Dare John come? John doesn’t dare to come. the action is no longer performed. needn't also occurs with the perfect infinitive to refer to a past situation. except in fairly formal English with hardly. I just need some money. the subjunctive is prescriptive. Need not expresses lack of necessity similarly to the negative forms of have to or need to. At the same time. / Does John dare to come? In the affirmative dare is used in the expression I daresay / I dare say. You need only touch one of the doors for the alarm to start ringing. thought. forms questions and negative forms with do). The subjunctive expresses value judgments. Modal need is mainly used in negative and interrogative sentences as a correlative of must. In How dare(d) you? / How dare(d) he / they?. 1935:391) While the indicative is informative. in this case it expresses an unnecessary action which was nevertheless performed. conception. (lack of necessity) What needn't have done and didn't have / need to do have in common is the lack of necessity. need (a fi necesar) and need to (a avea nevoie) differ in point of grammatical behavior since the former is a modal verb and the latter a full lexical verb (which. . in the case of a statement. the subjunctive "represents something not as actual reality. the choice is between didn't have to and didn't need to (the lexical verb). I needn't have driven to school to pick up Mary but I had forgotten she'd told me she had other plans. or. volition. DARE Dare resembles need to a great extent in that it has both modal and lexical variants and it also occurs in interrogative and negative sentences. Students must pay attention to the distinct grammatical properties of dare as modal and lexical verb: John daren’t come. In reported speech need is retained just like must: She believed she need not fear any persecution. wish. commentaries about theoretical or desirable situations or commands aimed at making somebody bring about a certain state of affairs." (George Curme.

not all negative if sentences can be turned into unless sentences: They wouldn't have come to the meeting unless they had been invited. Apart from the subjunctive forms mentioned so far. I'll give you a call. SYNTHETIC SUBJUNCTIVE . The same context mentioned above allows the use of if it were not for (for present reference). he would fail all his exams.OLD FORMS The old subjunctive is used in formulas and after would rather (expressing preference) and had better (interpreted as suggestion or advice): Long live the Queen! So be it! Come what may! Grammar be hanged! I would rather go to the mountains than to the seaside.The subjunctive can be either synthetic (using old inflectional forms) or analytic / periphrastic (employing modal verbs. I had better leave now. if can be followed by modal verbs that preserve their original meaning in these contexts: should. All of them have present and past forms. as well as the parallel structure happen to.NEW FORMS The new forms of the synthetic subjunctive . all followed by noun phrases: If it weren't for your interest in his studies. (hypothetical situation) They wouldn't have come to the meeting if they hadn't been invited. If it hadn't been for Jim. makes the possibility of an event seem unlikely: . on condition that or as long as. However." SYNTHETIC SUBJUNCTIVE . If I don't come back in time. But for her ambition. It's rather late. I would have drowned in the sea. Would rather can be replaced by prefer. At the same time. which are followed by the indicative: I'll lend you the money provided you don't tell my mother.second form of the verb for the present subjunctive (NB. would and could. she wouldn't have managed to overcome that situation. but this requires the use of the gerund: I prefer reading to writing. the most widely used being should). (hypothetical past situation) An alternative to the last example is a structure introduced by unless (= only if not) always followed by the verb in the affirmative. *I'll give you a call unless I come back in time. we can replace if with provided. I would rather have lived in the country." where British English uses the analytic subjunctive .are used in the following contexts: 1) after if: He wouldn't accept your apologies if he knew about your lies. will. Should after if. In its turn. if it hadn't been for (for past reference) or but for. If one situation depends on another."It's important that you should go there. I won't scold you again as long as you behave nicely. American English tends to use this type of subjunctive in contexts such as "It's important that you go there. the synthetic subjunctive classifies into an old subjunctive and a new one. TO BE has WERE for all persons) and had + third form of the verb for the past subjunctive .

or we use the present form of the subjunctive to imply that we are rather late in doing something: It's time (for us) to pack our luggage and go. Literary English also allows inversion of the subject and the auxiliary verb instead of an if clause (Had I arrived earlier instead of If I had arrived earlier. Were I to return sooner instead of If I were to return sooner. Compare: I still don't like him even if he tried to be nice to me last time I saw him. (factual) I wouldn't like him even if he tried to be nice to me. I could grant you the loan sooner. Apart from these two types of conditional tenses that employ subjunctive forms. The negative counterpart of will indicates one's refusal to do something: If he won't listen to me. more polite: If you will join me to that meeting. They were acting as if they hadn't recognized him.If you should hear from him/if you happen to hear from him. there is a third possibility that uses the indicative (usually. suggesting that the event in the conditional sentence necessarily precedes the event in the main clause: If you have finished your meal. usually referring to a bad habit: If you will laugh at people all the time. I wouldn't have tried to talk her out of selling the car! 3) after even if / even though: They would reject her proposal even if she followed their instructions. NB. If you would fill in these forms now. 2) after if only to add emphasis to a hypothetical situation or to suggest a sense of regret when combined with the past subjunctive. . we use a perfect form. NB. When we aim at emphasizing completion after if. no wonder nobody wants to talk to you. I would be very grateful. I can't help him. On the other hand. the simple present) in the subordinate and a future form in the main clause (see present tense simple with future value). I will clear the plates. 5) after it's (high) time we employ either the long infinitive or a For + Accusative + Infinitive construction to suggest that the right moment to do something has come. quite often the second part of the sentence is left out: If only I won the competition! If only she had told me the truth. will in if sentences can also express obstinate insistence. NB. would in similar contexts is more tentative. however with a difference in meaning. It's (high) time you informed her of your failure. will you inform me? Will after if introduces the idea of your willingness to do what is suggested. (hypothetical) 4) after as if / as though to express an unreal comparison: He is looking at me as if I were his long-lost brother. You wouldn't have found her even if you had hired a private detective.) Had and were are in fact the auxiliaries most commonly involved in such emphatic structures. It is also possible to employ the indicative after even if/though. etc.

I demand that they should be treated with more respect. 2) after boulomaic verbs: want. such sentences often express either a command. recommend. etc. It is desirable that he could obtain the loan to pay for his studies. a suggestion. an order. hope. I wish it would stop raining. would you still have attempted to save the kid? Imagine we'd never spent this time together! 9) after in case. prohibit. It is my desire that she should be invited to our reception. urge. advise. propose. an intention. suggest etc. 8) after supposing / suppose or imagine: Suppose you inherited a huge fortune. suggesting theoretical or potential states or events. etc. which introduces a contingency or possibility against which a precaution is needed in advance. we use either the indicative or the analytic subjunctive (to suggest greater improbability): I'll make a cake in case Father Ted drops by in the afternoon. in object clauses: He suggested that we should take the path to the left. I'll save a seat for you in case you should decide to come.6) after wish I wish he came back sooner. Function of the verb / adjective contained in the main clause or the noun phrase that functions as the antecedent of the relative clause which contains the subjunctive. beg. Notice that a construction with would after wish is possible when the speaker intends to express an annoying habit. SUBJECT AND OBJECT CLAUSES 1) after exercitive verbs: ask. command. 7) after would rather when the speaker's preference involves another person's performance of an action: I would rather they invited me to the theater. desire. a piece of advice. God forbid that your husband should find out you've been cheating on him! The king ordered that his kingdom should be divided among his sons. THE ANALYTIC SUBJUNCTIVE This type of subjunctive appears in complement THAT-clauses of various kinds. I desire that he should be granted the scholarship. He would rather his daughter hadn't behaved like a fool. instruct. how would you spend it? Supposing they hadn't arrived in time. I wish you would hurry up. choose in object clauses: . I wish they hadn't left for Rome. order. wish. a resolution. or a wish. to invite someone's cooperation or to indicate that either people or events frustrate his desires: I wish you would stop interrupting me.

but I can imagine it. imagine. I doubt that I should succeed. I insist that the meeting should be over by ten. We evacuated the building lest the walls should collapse. complain in object clauses: And that you should deceive us. However little you may love her.I wish you should be here. He had sat between the twins so that he could court them. remark. I didn't choose that they should shun her. be anxious / eager: I prefer that they should call before paying me a visit. inform. surprise. She convinced me that I should apply for a grant. say. well. - factive intransitive adjectives: be odd / tragic / amazing / surprising: It is amazing that they should survive after all this time. 4) in assertive sentences after doubt. I called in the hope that I might find you. matter.: It is important that you should understand the underlying meaning of his words.non-factive intransitive adjectives (in subject clauses): be good / right / best / important / essential / natural / (un)likely / necessary etc. bother. but I know that she is shamming. We dared not speak for fear the enemy might hear us. - factive transitive verbs (in subject and object clauses): amaze. fancy. point out. 2) CONCESSIVE: Foolish though she may be. I don't exactly understand it. she is kind of heart. 3) after verbs of linguistic communication: tell. in object clauses: He told them that I should be more careful with the kids. He regretted that the little girl should be ill. astonish. It is odd that you should have agreed to such a proposal. I desire that you should comply with my request. alarm. think. ADVERBIAL CLAUSES 1) OF PURPOSE: Let the dog loose so that he can have a run. prefer. convince. I don't think you will abandon her. arrange. It is very unlikely that he should have already received news from her. persuade etc. It amazes me that you could give up on us so easily. - non-factive transitive verbs and adjectives (in object clauses): intend. regret etc. It doesn't matter that Max should have bought a Cadillac.: It bothers me that he should be so obtuse. I am most anxious that she should get the present I bought for her. insist. hate. . 5) after emotive verbs and adjectives: .

Whatever sins he may have. he can still be saved. we would immediately evacuate the village. 3) OF CONDITION: Should the dam explode. She is so ill that she should be given an extra dose immediately. . 4) OF RESULT: We should proceed in such a manner that the public may indorse our cause. I could help you if you would agree to follow my advice.