This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
the grammatical categories/inflectional categories traditionally associated with the major parts of speech such as tense, aspect, mood, for the verb (number, gender, case, determination for nouns, pronouns etc, comparison for adjectives and adverbs). Language as an object of study has been approached from different perspectives: traditional (descriptive; meant to observe and enumerate aspects of language); structuralist (descriptive; an attempt to reflect the systematic character of language); generative (language is a body of rules by means of which all the sentences can be obtained). The structure of language can be analyzed in terms of levels of representation. For any utterance there are: - a phonological level – strings of phonemes - a morphological level – morphemes and words - a syntactic level – phrases and sentences - a semantic level – semantic concepts: events, objects, states, processes “Morphology” is a term based on the Greek words morphe (=form/structure) and logie (=account/study). In fact, the term can apply to any domain of human activity that studies the structure or form of something. In linguistics, morphology is the sub-discipline that accounts for the internal structure of words. There are two types of complexity of word-structure: one is due to the presence of inflections and another due to the presences of derivational elements. Both operations add extra elements to what is known as the base. Derivation refers to word formation processes such as affixation, compounding and conversion. Derivational processes typically induce a change in the lexical category of the item they operate on and even introduce new meanings (-er adds the meaning of agent/instrument). Inflection encompasses the grammatical categories/markers for number, gender, case, person, tense, aspect, mood and comparison. It is defined as “a change in the form of a word to express its relation to other words in the sentence”. Inflectional operations do not change the category they operate on ( goes or grammars are just variants of one and the same word go and grammar). Actually, they are formal markers that help us delimit the lexical category of a word, i.e. the parts of speech. In this respect, lexical items (words) that are distributionally similar (i.e. have the same distributional properties) form classes. (Traditionalists: parts of speech, structuralists: form/morpheme classes; generativists: lexical categories). All these terms are intended to designate elements from the same pool – N, V, A, Adv, P etc. – but the different terms are associated with the theoretical frames in which they were used and, hence, with methods of doing lg. research specific for that theoretical framework.
Inflectional affixes have the following characteristics: They produce closure upon words (can no longer attach a derivational element to them) Inflected forms are organized in paradigms, i.e. they are in complementary distribution; for instance, nouns occurs in pairs hat – hats, book – books. The elements of a paradigm may evince the phenomenon of suppletion – one of the forms is not phonologically related to the other: went for go, better for good. A paradigm can be defective – lacks a form: can - *cans, trousers - *trouser. Inflections are formal markers (semantically they are empty, abstract); they help us delimit the lexical category of the word to which they attach. In other words, each lexical category (major part of speech) is characterized by specific inflectional markers. Case, number, gender, and determination characterize nouns. Tense, aspect, mood, number and person characterize verbs. Person, number and –in some cases – gender characterize pronouns. Adjectives and adverbs are characterized by comparison. Although all of them lack descriptive content, they pass on the descriptive content of the category they depend on.
Traditional approaches: The basic unit of analysis was the word. Words operated as signs, i.e. as instruments for the description and understanding of reality. They were classified into parts of speech and set into paradigms of declension and conjugation. Traditional theories described words in terms of the traditional list of Aristotelian categories. Aristotle assumed that the physical world consisted of things (substances), which had certain properties (called accidents). Transferred to morphology, the substance of a word (its meaning) had to be distinguished from its accidents, i.e. the different forms it assumed in linguistic context. Thus, certain accidental categories were considered to be typical for particular parts of speech: nouns (inflected for case, number, gender; verbs for tense, number, person, mood, aspect). Hence, what are traditionally referred to as grammatical categories correspond to the accidental categories, and this explains the older term ‘accidence’ for what is also known as inflectional variation. The Aristotelian opposition matter vs. form also helped grammarians distinguish between major and minor parts of speech. Only major parts of speech (nouns, adjectives, verbs and adverbs) were meaningful. The other parts of speech (conjunctions, prepositions, pronouns, determiners, quantifiers, etc.) known as minor parts of speech did not signify anything of themselves but merely contributed to the total meaning of sentences by imposing upon them a certain form or organization. Thus, in delimiting parts of speech, traditionalist grammars, called ‘notional’, employed three criteria: meaning, inflectional variation and syntactic function. Meaning was basic and it was correlated with the other two criteria. The last two criteria are based on formal properties, so they define parts of speech in terms of their distribution. Notional definitions were incorrect in that they were circular – a term was explained by resorting to the same term. For instance, the noun was defined as the name of a living being or lifeless thing. But ‘virtue’ is neither a lifeless being, nor a living being, the only reason for saying that ‘virtue’ is a thing is that the word that refers to it is a noun. Structuralist approaches: It is a formal approach. Language was regarded as a system of relations, the elements of which had no validity independently of the relations of equivalence and contrast that held between them (syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations). It excluded meaning from its analysis and was based only on the distribution of the items analyzed. In structuralism, the lexical items (the traditional major parts of speech) and the grammatical items (typically the minor parts of speech and inflectional affixes) are distinguished in terms of paradigmatic oppositions and fall into two classes: open vs. closed classes of items. Open classes (nouns, adjectives, verbs and adverbs) have large numbers of items and new members can be added by coining or borrowing. Closed classes (conjunctions, prepositions, determiners, pronouns, etc. and inflectional affixes) include terms that have no descriptive content, having a fixed/limited number of items. Generative approaches: They are similar to the structuralists approaches in the sense that the lexical/grammatical categories can be defined only through their roles in the rules and principles of grammar. NB grammatical categories in generative approaches no longer refer to inflectional markers, but to syntactic categories (sentence, noun phrase, verb phrase etc.). Generative grammars operate with two types of categories: lexical and grammatical/syntactic categories. Lexical categories (N, V, A) coincide with the traditional parts of speech and the structuralist open classes, and grammatical categories (NP, VP, AP) correspond to phrases or syntagms – specific sequences of words. Each lexical category has a corresponding syntactic phrase - N → NP. In other words, syntactic phrases are projections of lexical categories. Then we translate the syntactic information in N → NP into functional information (i.e. the subcategorisation frame [_ NP] which is characteristic of a transitive verb is converted into functional information by stating that direct objects are characteristic of transitive verbs). According to this theoretical model, it is not lexical categories (N, V, A etc.) that correspond to semantic categories, but major syntactic categories (NP, VP, AP etc.) The syntactic categories are in a relation of correspondence with semantic categories such as events, processes, states, individual objects etc. We shall clarify this later on when we discuss number, aspect etc. As we shall see, events are represented by the syntactic category of verb phrase, e.g. read a novel, paint a picture. Objects will be represented by
the syntactic category of noun phrases: the chair, a chair, my chair, this chair etc. In other words, the ontological (semantic) categories are represented by major syntactic phrases, not by lexical categories. The lexical categories are defined in terms of features to be found in their lexical entries in the lexicon. These features include morpho-syntactic categories, i.e. inflections. Various parts of speech display certain categorical similarities, which can be represented in terms of shared features. The most important opposition for the parts of speech system is the opposition between verbal and nominal categories. Parts of speech are analyzed along the dimension [+/- V] or [+/- N]. The [+/- N] categories (A, N) are marked for gender, number and case, while the [+/- V] categories are not characterized by these features. Adjectives and adverbs share the inflectional/functional category of comparison. Another important opposition is between lexical categories and functional categories. This opposition is in part the same as the structural distinction between open classes (N, V, A etc.) and closed classes (Determiner, Inflection, Complementizer etc) of items. The open classes are defined as classes with descriptive/semantic content (N, V, A) containing indefinitely many items and which allow conscious coining, borrowing etc. On the other hand, functional categories include free morphemes: determiners, quantifiers, pronouns, auxiliary verbs, complementizers etc. and bound morphemes/inflectional affixes: inflections for tense, aspect, agreement/number. Hence the term ‘functional categories’ covers minor parts of speech and inflectional categories. They form a closed set of items which - never occur alone, - have a unique Complement and can’t be separated from it, - lack descriptive semantic content, - act as operators placing the Complement in time, in the world - are heads of lexical categories. Information expressed by inflection is not always dictated by syntactic structure. There are two types of inflection: - Inherent/morphological inflection (not required by the syntactic context): number with nouns and pronouns, person for pronouns, gender for nouns. - Contextual/syntactic (which follows from syntax): number and person in verbs, case in nouns. For instance: They are running in the field now. He is running home now. They – 3rd p.pl. – information contained in the lexical meaning of they. Hence, inherent. Are running vs. is running is contextual information provided by the context in which the verb is used and triggered by the presence of an agreement between the subject and the verb. Gender for nouns is inherent. E.g. queen. Case for nouns is contextual (triggered by the type of verb – double transitive as in ask somebody a question or a verb with dative and accusative as in lend money to someone). THE CATEGORY OF ASPECT Aspect – a notion of time, distinct from tense, which describes the internal temporal structure of events What Tense and Aspect have in common: both are functional categories delimiting the lexical category Verb, they are related morpho-syntactically (realized by verb inflections and auxiliaries) and semantically (both partake of the notion Time but in distinct ways). Where Tense and Aspect differ: Tense – represents the chronological order of events in time as perceived by the speaker at the moment of speaking; it locates the time of the event in the sentence relative to NOW Aspect – gives info about the contour of the event as viewed by the speaker at a given moment in time Traditional grammars: aspect is used for the perfective – imperfective opposition, referring to different ways of viewing the internal temporal constituency of a situation
The perfective – provides a holistic view upon the event, looking at the situation from outside The imperfective – is concerned with the internal phases of the situation, it looks at the situation from inside Current approaches: aspect covers two perspectives. It is still used to refer to the presentation of events through grammaticized viewpoints such as the perfective and the imperfective (viewpoint / grammatical aspect). In addition, the term also refers to the inherent temporal structuring of the situations themselves, internal event structure or Aktionsart (situation/eventuality-type aspect). Situation/eventuality type aspect refers to the classification of verbal expressions into states, activities, achievements, accomplishments and semelfactives (how we conceive of situations or states of affairs). Both viewpoint aspect and situation type aspect convey info about temporal factors such as the beginning, end and duration of a state of affairs/situation. However, we need to draw a clear line between them as situation types and viewpoint aspect are realized differently in the grammar of language, i.e. they differ in their linguistic expression: - viewpoint aspect (perfective vs imperfective) is signaled by a grammatical morpheme in English (be-ing); it is an overt category - situation type aspect is signaled by a constellation of lexical morphemes. Situation types are distinguished at the level of the verb constellation (i.e. the verb and its arguments (subjects and objects) and the sentence (adverbials)). Situation types lack explicit morphological markers. Situation type aspect exemplifies the notion of a covert category. Compare: She ate an apple. She was eating an apple. She walked to the park. She was walking to the park. The two components of the aspectual system of a language interact with each other in all languages, although across languages, aspectual systems vary considerably, especially the viewpoint subsystem. Situation types can be distinguished as covert categories in all languages. Since Aspect can be assumed to be defined as the interaction of the lexical meaning of the verb, the nature of its arguments (subjects and objects) and grammatical inflection, aspectual meaning holds for sentences rather than for individual verbs or verb phrases. Sentences present aspectual info about situation type and viewpoint. Although they co-occur, the two types of info are independent. Consider: Mary walked to school. (perfective – past tense, goal / natural endpoint) Mary was walking to school. (imperfective – be-ing, goal not reached) Mary walked in the park. (perfective, no goal; the event was simply terminated) Conclusion: Aspectual info is given by the linguistic forms of the sentences: situation type is signaled by the verb and its arguments, while viewpoint is signaled by a grammatical morpheme, usually part of the verb or verb phrase. The perfective viewpoint gives info about endpoints (beginning and end) while the imperfective gives info about internal or other stages or phases. The domain of aspect offers choices within a closed system to the speakers of a language. There is a small, fixed set of viewpoints and situation/eventuality types. One of each must be chosen whenever a sentence is framed. In other words, speakers’ choices in presenting actual situations are limited by conventional categorization, conventions of use and the constraints of truth. ASPECT - Conceptual features of the situations types There are three semantic features that help us distinguish among situation types: [+/- stative], [+/- telic] and [+/- durative]. They function as shorthand for the cluster of properties that distinguishes them.
The existence of telicity does not necessarily imply the presence of an internal argument (a syntactic object) and conversely the existence of an internal argument does not imply telicity: a) John stood up in a second. activity and change. the endpoint is arbitrary.STATIVE] covers the distinction between ‘stasis’ and ‘motion’ and separates situation types into the classes of states and events (activities.B. basic states separate into predicates that apply to individuals (kinds of objects or objects) or to stages of individuals. In English duration is explicitly indicated by adverbials (for phrases) and main verbs (keep.DURATIVE] distinguishes between situation types that take time (activities. which can be stopped or terminated at any time. etc). There are different types of states: basic-level states and derived stative predicates. basic states are: know the answer. The goal may be intrinsic to the event. yet the situation is an activity) N. (the verb has a direct object/internal argument. Events are doings. belief and other mental states. accomplishments) and instantaneous events (achievements and semelfactives).durative Durative Durative Durative Instantaneous Instantaneous +/.B. desire.TELIC] separates situation types into telic and atelic. [+/. [+/. there is a final point given by the expression ‘to the ground’. English syntactically distinguishes between: . Thus.telic Atelic Atelic Telic Telic Atelic States are stable situations. in this case constituting its natural endpoint. as it is with accomplishments and achievements (e. In The rock fell to the ground.stative Stative Dynamic Dynamic Dynamic Dynamic +/. Events consist of stages/phases rather than undifferentiated moments. (preliminary stage from an achievement) States Activities Accomplishments Achievements Semelfactives STATES +/.g. take place or culminate. Basic-level states According to the type of referent they apply to. States are characterized by the features [+ stative] and [+ durative]. Telic events are not limited to events that are under the control of an agent. accomplishments. achievements and semelfactives). states. location. States are the simplest of situation types. they have a culmination point. dispositions. since imperfective focuses on the internal stages of durative situations. break). Intuitively. they predicate a quality or property of an individual (possession. With instantaneous events. Duration is grammaticized overtly or covertly. they are [+ dynamic] or [stative]. N. that is. want. In other cases. The imperfective viewpoint (be – ing) is also related to duration. be tall. (telicity given by the particle ‘up’. involving causation (which includes both agentive and non-agentive subjects). continue). the imperfective may focus on preliminary or iterated/repeated stages: She was jumping up and down. as it is for activities and semelfactives. States are said to ‘hold’ whereas events occur. Typical. Telic situation types are directed towards a goal/outcome. consisting of undifferentiated moments. (repeated activity from a semelfactive) The plane was landing. happen. the verb is intransitive/atelic) b) John pushed the cart for hours. which lack an interval. but the subject is not an agent. The feature [+ telic] is not relevant for states because they are unbounded and have an abstract atemporal quality.[+/.
whereas usually the progressive is associated with an active interpretation. which are stative at the basic level of classification. lie. for instance using a particular preposition: read a book (acc. repetitions of instantaneous events. with verb constellations of position and location (sit. Compare: I saw the city hall from my window. She was hungry at noon. Process sentences consist of verb constellations presenting a process situation. etc. that is. desire. These qualify as multiple-event processes: eat cherries. stand). etc. They may appear in the progressive. may also have an achievement interpretation in the context of adverbs like ‘suddenly’ or with completive adverbials. paint the fence (acc. The socks are lying on the bed. be angry). if used in the simple present or past. (achievement) I like music. an activity has an arbitrary endpoint. (generic) My cat eats carrots. durative. c) in English. run along the beach. I saw a star.B. understand). changing into individual level predicates. but never ‘finish’. (habitual) N. there are other means of changing the telicity of a constellation. which is why they simply ‘stop’ or ‘terminate’. Perception verbs (see). They are compatible with expressions of simple duration and punctuality: He was angry for an instant.). that is. find pebbles on the beach all afternoon. (stage level predicate) London lies on the Thames. be tall. it rained for hours. read at a book (activ.a) Individual level predicates: permanent.) vs. The verb constellations may consist of: a) an atelic verb and compatible complements (if any): push a cart. Its termination is merely cessation of activity. play chess/the piano. although they involve no agency or change. Here. (individual level predicate) *London is lying on the Thames. c) Individual / stage level predicates: with interval statives. think about. (habitual) He writes novels. the progressive has a stative interpretation (they denote temporary states). drink wine. (state) Suddenly. the jewels glittered). enjoy. (state) I liked him in a second. while ‘activity’ is associated with human agency. and b) Stage level predicates: temporary states (be available. sleep. be in the garden. “process” encompasses both activities associated with human subjects (external causation) ( he swam/slept/strolled in the park) and activities that are not cases of human agency (the ball rolled/moved. They are semantically stative precisely because they denote properties that hold over individuals or patterns/generalizations over events rather than specific situations. be widespread). Processes are atelic. love) and some verbs of mental states (know. b) an atelic durative verb with a complement that is cumulative or uncountable. Tigers eat meat. be drunk. dream. write letters. hence the ungrammaticality of the third sentence in which London does not qualify as a moveable object. An activity does not have a goal or natural endpoint. sprawl. which describe relatively stable. verbs of feeling (like.). paint away at the fence (activ. The progressive is acceptable with these predicates only if the subject denotes a moveable object. laugh. such as achievements and semelfactives: cough for five minutes. Multiple events also include iterations. walk in the park. dynamic events. which denote transitory properties and apply to stages of individuals. (achievement) ACTIVITIES (PROCESSES) The term ‘process’ is favored over ‘activity’ because. Derived statives a) generic sentences b) habitual sentences Events can be recategorized into states.) vs. etc. non-temporary states (know. non-transitory inherent properties that apply to individuals (objects or kinds). perch. .
miss the target. durative verbs and directional complements: The kid walked to school. Accomplishments are conceptualized as durative events. consisting of a process and an outcome / change of state and having successive stages in which the process advances to its conclusion. find a penny. nor resultant stages. poison your roommate ). The predicates are reinterpreted as multiple-event activities: John was kicking the ball when I saw him. Thus. remember. discover. When they occur with period adverbials and the progressive. the change being the completion of the process: build a bridge. simply leaving out or backgrounding the causing activity and causing factor. repair a car. iterated semelfactive events. leave. shelve the books. hit. reach the top. notice. Even if some achievements may be preceded by some preparatory activity (land. accomplishments are complex events because they have other event types as their components. etc. drink a glass of wine. hiccup. lose the watch. John kicked the ball for five minutes and then left. Achievements focus mainly on the change of state. reach the top. accomplishment constructions consist of constellations that have: a) Atelic.ACCOMPLISHMENTS Accomplishments describe change-of-states prepared (brought about/caused) by some activity/process. Also. lose. d) Atelic verbs and resultative phrase: The alarm clock ticked the baby awake. Semelfactives do not have preliminary stages. remember. cook a pie. this instantaneous type does not conceptualize it. In a nutshell. etc. ACHIEVEMENTS Achievements are instantaneous. c) Atelic. An accomplishment is a causal structure of the type “e 1 causes e2) where e1 is the causing activity/process and e2 is the resulting (change of) state. Thus. notice. durative verbs and certain prepositions: The boy ran out. Stereotypic achievements are: die. instantaneous events: cough. The maid swept the floor clean. recognize. they are interpreted as derived durative processes/activities consisting of a series of repeated. kick the ball. win the race). die. slam/bang the door. He sang himself hoarse. recognize. Verbs plus particle constructions also read as accomplishments: throw something away/down/up/aside/in. flap a wing. single stage events that result in a change of state. lexical causative verbs are accomplishments ( break a window. knock. But remember that we can focus on the preliminary stage and turn the achievement into an activity if we employ the progressive: The plane landed. win the race. (activity) The predicates that do not presuppose a preparatory activity are known as ‘lucky achievements’: find. SEMELFACTIVES Semelfactives are atelic. cool the soup. (achievement) The plane was landing. durative verbs and countable arguments: They drank a glass of beer and left. THE ASPECTUAL RECATEGORIZATION OF VERB PHRASES Predicates shift from their prototypical class due to various elements in the verb constellations: . arrive. resultative constructions (which lexicalize both the causing activity and the resulting state) qualify as accomplishments: The wind shaped the hills into cones. b) Atelic.
(activity) Tom walked two kilometers in half an hour. burn. they become activities. Tom walked for an hour. (accomplishment) She combed her hair for two minutes. N.B. (activity) (3) Adverbials: If an activity is combined with an adverbial of extent. (activity) He discovered a treasure in the backyard. Tom wrote the essay in two hours. He played chess for two hours. (activity) (2) Direct Object: If the direct object of an accomplishment or achievement is a bare plural noun phrase. cut. (state) He is killing a chicken for dinner. (state) Activity verb phrases such as rub. it becomes an accomplishment. Almost any verb can become part of a habitual sentence if used in the simple present. (achievement) Tourists discovered that beautiful castle for years. states. (activity) Tom walked to the building in ten minutes. (activity) / This burns like fire. (achievement) Tom has been discovering lice in his son's hair for three days. designating a general characteristic of the subject: The wood is burning in the fireplace. scratch. (activity) / Your behavior kills me. The tourists have discovered a beautiful castle. it turns it into an activity. it turns into an accomplishment. (activity) He plays chess (every day). (activity) The battalion was crossing the border for twenty minutes. (accomplishment) If an activity combines with a locative noun phrase. (activity) / Tom read a book in an hour. kill turn into states when used in the simple present form. accomplishments and achievements recategorize into activities unfolding at a certain reference time. (accomplishment) Tom ate popcorn for an hour. (accomplishment) ASPECTUAL CLASSES OF VERB PHRASES AND THE PROGRESSIVE ASPECT . (accomplishment) (4) Tense: Habitual sentences always designate states. Tom walked in the woods for an hour. (accomplishment) Tom wrote essays for two hours.(1) Subject: If the subject of an achievement is an indefinite plural noun phrase or a collective noun. sometimes with a frequency adverbial. the achievement recategorizes into an activity. Some verbs can have several readings even though the verb phrase does not undergo any change of the type illustrated above: Tom read a book for an hour. Tom ate his hamburger in three minutes. (activity) / She combed her hair in two minutes. (state) (5) Progressive / Continuous Aspect: When used in the progressive aspect. (activity) If the direct object of an accomplishment or an achievement is a mass noun.
They refer to a manifestation of the individual. changing their meaning. / While she was rehearsing for the show. (process unfolding now) The second set of sentences describes temporary activities under the control of the individuals. The river is flooding. they do not normally combine with the progressive. tap. / She is taller than you. (activity) The man fell into the river and drowned. (activity) STATE VERB PHRASES States are defined as having an abstract quality and an atemporal interpretation. believe. he slipped on a banana skin and broke a leg. (achievement) When his son came running to help him. her maid was sewing her dress for the gala. wonder. Compare: I imagine she will agree to your proposal. nod. etc.). they express temporally and spatially limited processes unfolding at a certain reference time. ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND ACHIEVEMENTS The internal structure of accomplishments and achievements presupposes a final goal. which refers to situations of limited duration. (general properties) He is being rude tonight. etc. as. outcome or result that is suspended when the respective verb phrases combine with the progressive aspect. Hence. The implication is that their behavior is deliberate and they can put an end to it if they want to. I think he is wrong. meanwhile. be young. trust. / As he was crossing the street. They hope to win. certain adjectives / nouns express properties that can be altered and thus. tremble. pat. etc. They built their house in two years. all the while. imagine. Sometimes they describe two simultaneous processes and are connected either by and or by subordinating conjunctions such as while.ACTIVITY VERB PHRASES Used in the continuous aspect. / I'm thinking of giving up smoking. Yet. When used in the progressive. hope. Compare: He is a teacher. etc. knock. not to a characteristic property of his. / I was only imagining those ugly scenarios. They are said to designate a property of the subject that lasts throughout time. semelfactives: jump. . think. (1) to be + property-designating adjectives and nouns: If the adjective / noun designates a permanent property of an individual. allow us to refer to only a temporally limited stage of the individual. the man was already drowning. they acquire an activity reading. However.). for some time. slam / bang the door. (accomplishment) They were building the house when the accident happened. etc. / Meanwhile he was trying to find out who had robbed him. The dog is jumping up and down. activity verb phrases designate processes unfolding at a certain reference time. When they occur in the progressive. Her lips were trembling. with or without adverbials expressing duration (all the time. all day / night long. / He was hoping against hope that there was still a chance of success. describe a series of repeated processes rather than a single process: The boy was kicking the ball against the wall. / You're being a total bastard. the verb will never appear in the continuous (be tall. in which case the use of the progressive is required. there are certain state verb phrases that may appear in the continuous. (2) mental cognition verb phrases: know. be old. kick. When they appear in the continuous.
(3) physical cognition verb phrases: see. they express temporary properties. If used in the progressive. I'm seeing the doctor next week. See and hear even acquire new meanings when appearing in the continuous: The court is hearing the evidence tomorrow. measure. the subject deliberately does the action of 'weighing' or 'measuring': The baby weighs six pounds. we perceive it as unidirectional (forwards). dislike. taste. that is. Everybody envied everybody in that room. hear. Again.Time is an epistemic notion as it mirrors our experience of the world. they describe processes going on for a limited period of time. lie. miss. weigh. etc. The milk tastes sour. contain. the atemporal quality of the state verbs is replaced with the temporal quality of the process unfolding for a certain period of time. etc. want. / The mistake is costing us dearly. etc. / He will be despising me heartily.Time is durationally infinite and segmentable. Time is segmented by two different procedures: . Verbs like weigh or measure have a behavior similar to that of perception verbs. / I can hear the wind blowing. In this case the subject is attributed intention or purpose: You smell nice. Even if they make reference to an act of perception unfolding at a specific moment like NOW. (5) other property designating verb phrases: belong. It they combine with the progressive. . (6) locative verb phrases: sit. . consist. remain. which preserves the sequential character of our perception of the world. / *I'm hearing the wind blowing. / Are you belonging to the local library? The castle costs a fortune.a personal subjective estimate of duration . like. / I was envying him his freedom at the time. there is . TENSE TIME VS TENSE (TIME IS REFLECTED BY TENSE) - Time is objective in the sense that it does not have absolute reality outside the form of our perception of the world.a public estimate based on the periodicity of natural phenomena Accordingly. The necklace belongs to me. . / He is tasting the soup to see if it's got enough salt. Such verbs appear in the continuous if their subject represents a moveable object and describe temporary states: Her new house stands / (*is standing) at the corner of our street. (I have made an appointment) (4) emotive verb phrases: love. they avoid the use of the continuous. / I'm smelling your perfume to see if I can guess what it is.Time has a linear representation. they do not occur in the progressive if they denote a general characteristic of a certain individual / object. I despise bad behavior. it is not inherent to objects. (they are listening to and trying the case). Instead. stand. / He is standing near the pole. smell. feel Also referred to as 'verbs of perception'. rest. / The nurse is weighing the baby. they appear accompanied by the modal verb CAN: I hear the wind blowing. hate.
In addition to this. the moment NOW is central in the sense that time past or time future represent DIRECTIONS whose ORIENTATION depends on ST. tense inflection) and temporal adverbials. sentences without time adverbials may be non-ambiguous due to the context. i. Tense is a deictic category. Tense inflections are strongly related to adverbials. ST/NOW is a central point on the temporal axis of orientation according to which we interpret the ordering of events/states. All accounts of tense make interpretation sensitive to tense. characteristic of society. Albert is playing tennis. If we assume that.e. Events can be simultaneous with ST (at relation) or they can be sequential to it (before / after relations).e. roughly speaking. i. at least.- a personal time: man’s endeavor to measure duration by using his emotions as an instrument (time is expanded or contracted) a public time. which acts as a time adverbial giving a certain temporal reading or due to the fact that people tend to maximise available information. the stars etc) TENSE: A DEICTIC CATEGORY Tense is generally defined as representing the chronological order of events in time as perceived by the speaker at the moment of speaking. The latter add meaning to a sentence and during the process they might even disambiguate it. its periodic relation to the sun. speech time (ST). . we have to talk about sentence temporal interpretation or. there are regular co-occurrences between tense inflections and time adverbials (there are adverbials that co-occur only with simple past or only with present perfect and there are others that co-occur with both). A VP consists of both its lexical head V0 and the complement(s) it has selected. we apply the relation of simultaneity wherever possible. In fact they are not enough to express the temporal specification of a message. TIME/TEMPORAL ADVERBIALS Time adverbials include adverbs. (then / future) This actually means that we associate with a sentence that is vague the temporal interpretation that requires the least additional information (sort of default reading). time measurement is subjected to public agreement and it is based on the periodicity of some observable natural phenomena (revolution of the earth round its axis. On the other hand. adverb phrases and adverbial clauses and they specify RT together with tense inflections. It means that when discussing temporal interpretation. INFL identifies the event of the VP in the sense that it places that particular event in time. we cannot conceive of this event without taking into account the complements of the respective verb as well as those explicit lexical means of placing the event in time: time adverbials. (now / tomorrow) Albert was playing tennis. A proper interpretation of temporal forms presupposes an analysis of the relation between (i) (ii) tense specification of the V (i. the descriptive content of a verb is the idea of event. the moon. Tense is a functional category that expresses a temporal relation to the orientation point (ST) in the sense that it locates in time the situation talked about. We know that information about the selection of complements by a verb is part of the lexical entry of that verb in the lexicon and it represents more or less its descriptive content. about predicate temporal interpretation.e. TENSE: MORE THAN TENSE INFLECTIONS A common mistake in approaching the category of tense is the belief that tense inflections alone mirror time.
etc. since the war/Christmas. they locate the situation at an interval during which the event is completed/culminates. 2. they indicate the duration of the described event by specifying the length of time that is asserted to take contribute to the location of the event in time. Such clashes are resolved by a shift in the value of the verb constellation. into activity) 3. completive adverbials. John knocked on the door for two hours. (acc. (ach. for a while. within two months. For years. all the time. into state – habitual) The felicity of the aspectual reinterpretation is strongly dependent on linguistic context and knowledge of the world. requiring compatibility with the situation type. I read a book for a few minutes. John noticed the painting in a second. a. the train arrived late. into state – habitual) 6. completive adverbials are telic compatible with telic situations and odd with atelics 1. all day long. (telic) *The train arrived late for two hours. Compare: *John went into the house all afternoon. . for hours. locating / frame adverbials and frequency adverbials.Classification of time adverbials The relation between time adverbials and ST can be explicit or non-explicit. Whenever telic events occur in the context of duration adverbials there is a clash between the aspectual properties of the situation type and the aspectual properties of the adverbials. (coercion into a process) 2. (atelic) (?) John wrote a / the report for two hours. over the weekend. Aspectually. Duration and completive adverbials also have an aspectual value (they are sensitive to the aspectual value of the situation). tomorrow) unanchored adverbials which do not have an explicit relation to ST and which orient themselves to times other than the utterance time or to utterance time (in June. Mary wrote a sonnet in five minutes. in a second. Jon played the sonata for two hours. This contextual interpretation is made possible by the process called coercion. Completive adverbials: in 2 hours. 2. 3. For months. permanently. during the war. they have various interpretations. Susan was asleep for two hours. into process – iterative: many times) 5. but odd with telic sentences compatible with states and processes (activities) 1. always. (acc. b. (acc. 3. We distinguish between: (i) (ii) anchored time adverbials which are in an explicit relation to ST in the sense that their temporal interpretations are determined relative to ST (now. Mary went to school in the morning. more specifically within the stated interval compatible with atelic sentences. (semelf. Jerry wrote a report for two hours. (atelic) Andrew swam for three hours. 1. John crossed the border all afternoon. at night. through August. Duration adverbials: for three months/a day/a week. all afternoon. into process of the multiple-event type) 4. which receives a marked interpretation. (?) Bill swam laps in an hour. on Friday). 4. yesterday. Given that temporal adverbials also contribute to the aspectual interpretation of sentences we can establish a further classification that distinguishes among: duration adverbials.
they indicate the recurrent pattern of situations within the reference interval they express a series of events which as a whole make a state of the habitual type: We often/always went/go to the mountains in wintertime. in the evening. every week/month etc. on Sundays. The past is considered to be factually determined since we know if an action took place or not in the past. referential adverbials: refer to a time established by clock or calendar: at six. in instructions or when specifying game rules etc. Frequency adverbials: frequently. sometimes. in the sense that the adverbials refer to an interval elapsed before the beginning of the situations and not an interval during which the situations occur. Generic sentences are true of some particular entities. Locating adverbials / Frame adverbials: they locate situations in time by relating them to other times or to other situations they refer to an interval of time within which the described situation is asserted t have taken place according to the time of orientation we can distinguish three classes: 1. in three days. On the contrary. If (3) and (4) can be understood at all. before. monthly. The same interpretation as the latter occurs with achievements and semelfactives: “They reached the top in ten minutes” (after ten minutes). in March. definitions. these NPs get a generic interpretation only when occurring in characterizing sentences. this year. definite singular NPs and mass nouns. GENERIC VALUE – unmarked value Present Tense Simple used in generic sentences indicates the validity of a state at speech time without making reference to a particular situation or moment. The present expresses both situations whose time of occurrence is known and situations whose time of occurrence is not known.4. It ascribes a property to a subject. “She knocked at the door in ten minutes” (after ten minutes). they impose an ingressive interpretation to the sentences. already 3. on Christmas. proper names and quantified NPs but in this case the locus of genericity is not in the NP but rather in the sentence itself.the speech time . They can also appear with indefinite NPs. once a week. therefore. daily. last Sunday. it appears in so-called ‘characterizing’ sentences. in 1987 PRESENT TENSE SIMPLE Present Tense Simple is associated with the present moment . (?) Mary believed in ghosts in an hour. in proverbs. at night. d. on Sunday. Generic sentences are timeless statements expressing general or universal truths. the present is between the past and the future. august 19. early. geographical statements. Present simple is associated with stative verbs and it is used in scientific language. c. VALUES OF PRESENT TENSE SIMPLE 1. the future is the least factually determined time. “In/after an hour Bill swam laps”. i. at lunchtime. “At the end of an hour/after an hour Mary began to believe in ghosts”. tomorrow. anaphoric adverbials: relate to a previously established time: until. last week. As far as its factual status is concerned. namely ‘kinds’. today. deictic adverbials: oriented to the time of utterance (ST): now. two weeks ago 2.e. often. two years later. never. till. Kind referring expressions are bare plurals.in the sense that it may refer either to a point in time identified with speech time (ST) or to an interval that includes the moment of speaking. tonight. The possible telic reinterpretations are: “Bill swam his planned number of laps in an hour”. . whenever.
never. Very often. 2. usually. (no frequency and no interval) 3. war reports.marked The instantaneous simple present refers to an event that is assumed to be simultaneous with the moment of speaking. they include adverbs of frequency classified into general (ever. but this simultaneity is rather subjective than objective. INSTANTANEOUS VALUE . and exclamations. Habitual sentences may be completely specified. I hereby pronounce you man and wife. The instantaneous present is also used in performative sentences that employ performative verbs verbs that themselves are part of the activity they report . pronounce. indicating both the frequency and the interval during which an event takes place. / He is shutting the window. seldom) and specific (three times a week. whenever. habitual sentences refer to an individual or an object about which the respective property is true at speech time. We sentence you to prison for life. Goal! First I roll out the pastry. the performative verb appears in the first person singular or plural and may be accompanied by hereby: I name this ship "Queen Mary". Mourning Becomes Electra) It is true that in most cases the event does not occur exactly when it is mentioned. Popescu sends the ball into the net. In performative sentences the event reported and the act of speech are simultaneous simply because they are identical. Yet. whereas the continuous present represents a neutral description of an action going on at the moment of speaking. books or movies and stage directions: Hagi takes the ball and passes it to Popescu.such as accept. commentaries on pictures. (specified frequency and interval) They visit me every day. the use of the simple present is rather dramatic since it insists on the total completion of the event mentioned. London stands on the Thames. Since they do not focus on a particular situation but rather on its recurrence. every two weeks). twice a day. they do not point to a specific moment in time and in this respect they resemble generic sentences. HABITUAL VALUE – unmarked value Habitual sentences indicate that a situation is repeated with a certain frequency during an interval of time. Events that are simultaneous with the moment of speaking may be expressed either by a simple present or a present continuous: He shuts the window. deny. unlike generic sentences. However. demonstrations. It is used in sports commentaries. (unspecified frequency) He doesn't eat many vegetables. name. A performative act is felicitous on condition that the persons and the circumstances . often. more often than not they have less than complete temporal specification.Water boils at 100ºC. However. Compare: They visit me every two days during holidays. declare. When having an instantaneous value. and then I add the mixture and spread it… Here comes the winner! In ‘Gone with the wind’ Scarlet writes a letter. (unspecified interval) He eats a lot of vegetables in winter. Seth and Minnie come forward as far as the lilac clump… He nudges Minnie with his elbow… (O’Neill. Blood is thicker than water.
in other words. It refers to mostly official or collective future plans or arrangements that cannot be altered.marked The use of the Simple Present with a past value is best known as the historic present and represents a storyteller's license.: The caravan sets off tomorrow morning. In the examples below the content of the adverbial clause is assumed to exist as a fact: I'll see what to do when I meet him. It may relate to timetables. The simple present with this value often alternates with a time adverbial indicating the past: . (instantaneous reading because of the suggestion of instantaneous perception indicated by "Look") He scores goals. I will take my umbrella if it rains. unless etc. the swallows fly higher than the doves. However. what he is recounting. (generic reading) Look. By the time you get there. the "historic present is pretty frequent in connected narrative: the speaker. (direct object clause) / I don't know this. which provides an axis of orientation for the action predicted in the main clause. Compare: I will talk to him when I see him. (conditional clause) I don't know if it will rain. the anticipated event is attributed the same degree of certainty that we normally assign to present or past events. schedules. when. (habitual interpretation because of the plural direct object) He scores a goal. forgets all about time and imagines.involved in it are appropriate for the invocation of the respective procedure (for instance.m. before. FUTURE VALUE . PAST VALUE . arrive in London at noon and set off for Glasgow in the evening. tomorrow. The use of the simple present with future value in adverbial clauses of time and condition has more than a syntactic explanation. as vividly as if it were now present before his eyes". Both habitual and generic sentences may receive instantaneous readings under certain circumstances: Swallows fly higher than doves. or recalls. There is a contrast of meaning between the main clause and the subordinate. itineraries etc. Students are inclined to think that they must use only the simple present after clauses introduced by when and if. As Jespersen (1931:17) remarked. the rule applies only to those cases in which when and if introduce adverbial clauses of time and condition. The use of the simple present signals the fact that the future event is bound to happen. if. as it were. whereas the event expressed in the latter is a fact that is taken as given. being typical of an oral narrative style. (instantaneous interpretation) 4. The event referred to in the former is a prediction. (direct object clause) / I don't know this. For this reason the simple present with this value represents the only marked way to express the future time in English. (time clause) I don't know when I will see him. We leave Bucharest on Monday morning. as soon as. it is only a priest that can marry you and this can happen only in a church). NB. I will be very unhappy if our team does not win. the show will have already begun. 5.marked The simple present may acquire a future value either in simple sentences or in subordinate adverbial clauses of time and condition introduced by after. In simple sentences it is accompanied by a temporal adverbial indicating the future: The plane leaves for New York at 5 p.
last summer. / I just talked to him on the phone a moment ago. At the same the historic present is employed when describing an artist and his work because this feels as if they were still alive.Brahms finishes his first symphony. Virg. The fact was she had made a private marriage… (Thackeray. the simple present appears in newspaper headlines to announce recent events. in 1974. 614) PAST TENSE SIMPLE The simple past is used to locate a situation at some specified time in the past. learn. that is. imaginary events.). In such cases. Compare: Brahms is the last great representative of German classicism. hear: Mary tells me that you are going to buy new furniture. Gore shakes hands with Mr. Bush. but to an imaginary present time. (in a letter) Your correspondent Mr. Though tell and hear in the examples above refer to the initiation of a message. Stefanescu. the content of the event or state described being actually recollected at speech time. the simple present may also refer to imaginary situations. (photo caption) 1876 . 1988:261) However. This fictional use makes reference to no real time. it is also present in photographic captions in newspapers. then he sees the artist as a person who died at a certain moment in the past. then he considers that the artist still survives through his work. His lordship had no sooner disappeared behind the trees of the forest. (I. Although so far all the uses of the simple present have involved real facts. but Lady Randolph begins to explain to her confidante the circumstances of her early life. giving the reader the impression that he is actually witnessing the events described. LIX. etc. He was born in London in 1952 and spent his entire life there. telling me the boss wants to see me in a hurry. Pitt writes in the March issue that… (in the correspondence column of a journal) In both cases the simple present emphasizes the persistence in the present of the effect of a past communication. However. the person uttering the sentence must have a definite time in mind suggested by means of specific time adverbs ( yesterday. There are two basic elements of meaning involved in the common use of the simple past. The simple past may appear alone if the speaker who has a specific time in mind can assume that his interlocutor can . the situation described by the simple past takes place before the present moment. Finally. Ch. two days ago.At that moment in comes a messenger from the Head Office. so that communication is still in force for the receiver. which means that the moment NOW is excluded. a distinction has to be made between the historic present described above and the present forms employed to narrate fictional. the simple present often alternates with a past tense. Brahms was the last great representative of German classicism. its use reminding one of the dramatic quality of the instantaneous present. speakers do not need to locate a past event by means of a time adverb. The difference between using the present and using the past simply involves the speaker's point of view: if he employs the present. Mr. / I bought this dictionary when I was in Lisbon. First. / Ex-president dies of heart attack. in historical summaries and tables of dates: MPs back school reform. Second. say. The historic present is also used after verbs of linguistic communication such as tell. the use of the present seems to transfer the verbal meaning from the initiating to the receiving end of the message. and if he uses the past.
. the simple past can be used without a definite adverb of time if the utterance refers to a comparison between present and past conditions as in: Bucharest is no longer what it was / used to be. / B: Well. VALUES OF PAST TENSE SIMPLE 1. Once an anterior frame of reference is established for the discourse it is only natural to refer to the already introduced situation by means of a definite specifier.A. in the first two examples above the definiteness of the situation is confirmed by the definiteness of the participants involved (my message) or of the circumstances (Led Zeppelin did perform in Bucharest on a specific day which is officially known). we use the simple past for narrative even when referring to future events as in science fiction.e. whether the events narrated are real historical events or just fictional situations devised in novels. In the year AD 2201. Then he stepped out into the garden and faced the enemies. and a great moth flew into his face.(…)' (Dylan Thomas . S. In this case the location of the event in time is established in relation to the moment of speaking NOW: Haydn was born in 1732. such a retrospective view. 2. He opened the garden door. of course. / A: What did you do there? / B: I had lunch. NARRATIVE VALUE Since it deals with past events the simple past is a natural choice for narratives. Any narrative normally presupposes. the interplanetary transit vehicle Zeno VII made a routine journey to the moon with twenty people on board. last night. then set it down again and went out into the scullery.understand this either by inferring the time from the larger context in which the situation occurs or by making use of the definiteness of the participants involved: Did you remember to give him my message? Did you see Led Zeppelin perform live in Bucharest? A: I couldn't find Mary at the party last night. the simple past: A: Where have you been? / B: To the restaurant. Leech (1971: 10). In the last example. / My friend left for Poland in July. DEICTIC VALUE The simple past can be used deictically with a deictic adverb of time of the type yesterday. Another particular case in which a past simple is used without a definite adverb of time involves a combination with the present perfect. speaker A specifies the past moment and speaker B does not need to mention it in his turn.'In the Garden' . in the imagination. / I finished reading the book last night. I couldn't find her either. "We are invited by this convention to look at future events as if from a vantage-point even further in the future." . the simple past is no longer accompanied by a time adverbial and the situations described by this tense are ordered by the laws governing the narrative mode rather than by information present in the sentences proper. only that it be specifiable. The latter is used to introduce an unspecified event that takes place anterior to the moment of speaking in a period that began in the past and includes the moment NOW. It is the whole context created by the advancing of the story that supplies the order of the events. / He is a nitwit. Finally. in 1987. '(…) She left him alone in the kitchen. Thus. Thus it becomes obvious that the definiteness of the event expressed by the simple past does not necessarily presuppose that the time in question be specified. but he is less of a nitwit than he was.Collected Stories) Moreover. in this case. He picked up a chair. However. etc. i. two years ago.
the simple past refers to events recurrent within a given past interval of time. The event of unlocking the door necessarily takes place before its opening and thus the simple past "unlocked" has past perfect value.i. allowing speaker A to either accept or decline the request. (non-habitual) My dog chased my neighbor's cat / a cat. suggesting that speakers A and B have similar social positions. "Do you want me?" would have been rather imperative. which would have made a polite answer impossible. Although speaker B could have used the present instead of the past. HABITUAL VALUE When used with this value. As soon as she saw / had seen me. (non-habitual) My dog chased cats. (simultaneous) He unlocked and opened the door. (habitual) I went to the mountains three times that year. in most cases they are used in combination with the continuous aspect. and would have implied that the former was not at all pleased with speaker B making a request. 5. On the other hand. Brian ran a mile every day during his childhood. I went out with my friends. The habitual interpretation can be rendered by the frequency adverbial whose determiner must be indefinite or by a plural indefinite object: I went to the mountains three times a year. (habitual) 4. PAST PERFECT VALUE This value is derived from a contrast between simultaneous past events and past events occurring in a sequence. she rose quickly and left the room. the temporal relation between two consecutive events can be overtly marked by means of conjunctions (preserving the simple past in both the main clause and the subordinate clause) or by the auxiliary HAVE. which indicates anteriority: I (had) read twenty more pages before I went to bed. Compare: Brian runs a mile every day. speaker A's question indicates politeness.e. the past form avoids a clash of wills. which appears in everyday conversation making reference to the present feelings or thoughts of the speaker: A: Did you want me? B: Yes. whereas a reversal of the order of the events in the second example is impossible basing our judgment on our knowledge about the way these activities can be performed. PRESENT TIME VALUE This represents a special development of the normal past meaning. indicating the recurrence of the event. Other verbs often present in similar contexts are wonder and think. Unlike a present form. which adds a further overtone of politeness: . Similarly. simple past sentences allow the presence of both a time adverbial indicating the frequency specification and a time adverbial that supplies the interval during which the recurring event took place. (sequential) In the first example the order of the events can be reversed without altering the meaning of the sentence. Unlike simple present sentences in which the time adverbial specifies the event time . I hoped you could give me a hand with the cleaning. his choice of the respective verbal form renders the request indirect and thus.3. more polite. He enjoyed and admired her paintings. After I (had) finished dinner.
In “John read the book last year”.I wondered / was wondering if you could help me with the kids while I am away. rather. (c) The Extended Now Theory – speakers can psychologically ‘extend’ the present backwards by means of present perfect in English. (b) The Current Relevance Theory – it is only present perfect that claims relevance at the moment NOW. relevant to the present moment through its result: now. ET is indefinite and “specified” only by indefinite adverbials: since 3 o’clock. they express states extending over a period of time that lasts up to the present moment: I have lived in Paris since 1987. I thought I might drop by later tonight if you don't mind. a feature the past simple lacks. The present perfect serves to locate an event within a period of time that begins in the past and extends up to the present moment (and includes it). There have been several theories that tried to capture this distinction between the past simple and the present perfect: (a) The Indefinite Past Theory – present perfect locates events somewhere before the moment of speaking. Compare “You woke him up when you went to the bathroom ten minutes ago. we understand that John’s reading the book in its entirety occurred at some unspecified time in the past. yet. but the event is related and. Without renouncing the idea that the perfect marks anteriority. etc. the past tense specifies that an event occurred at a past time that is separated and distinct from the present. etc. Thus. it stems from the interaction of the perfect form with the aspectual meaning of the verb phrase. the perfect may acquire different senses according to the type of aspectual class 'have' combines with: 1) continuative perfect 2) experiential perfect 3) resultative perfect 4) 'hot news' perfect CONTINUATIVE PRESENT PERFECT When the present perfect combines with state verb phrases in sentences that contain a durative adverbial (for instance. in contrast. John knows what the book is about. PRESENT PERFECT Past events can be predicated about either in the past tense or the present perfect from two different perspectives. The castle has been empty for ages. Before embarking upon an analysis of the two tenses mentioned above. for two hours. ET of past simple events is definite: at two o’clock. In “John has already read the book”. since the English perfect is quite often related to the meaning of completion or result. thus. we can maintain the connection between the perfect and the perfective in view of the fact that what is 'summed up as a whole' (i. so far. since / for phrases).” to “You’ve waken him up” – the present perfect itself in the second sentence locates the effects of the event at NOW.e. What we need to understand is that the 'result / completion' meaning is not intrinsic to the perfect. just like the other meanings of the present perfect. without identifying any particular point or interval of time. yesterday. perfective) may also be anterior to a certain moment in time. which is prior and thus distinct from the moment NOW. Have you known my uncle for a long time? . we should clarify the relationship between the English perfect and the perfective aspect. plus the temporal adverbials it co-occurs with. In contrast. the event of John’s reading the book in is entirety is specified/dated as occurring during last year.
Modes of occurrence: a) general experiential: He has never liked heavy metal. I went to Hollyrood Palace. Since a habit is described as a state consisting of repeated events. The news has been broadcast at ten o'clock for as long as I can remember. that the time when it takes place is not mentioned. / A: Have you ever in your life seen anyone so entirely delightful? B: Only when I’ve looked in the mirror. we may subsume it in the previous class as a type of 'recurrent continuative' perfect. there are exceptions to this rule if the semantic content of the respective sentence suggests a period leading up to the present. At the same time. the adverbial of duration cannot be absent from the sentence or otherwise the construction acquires an indefinite past reading. Have you ever been to the States? Have you visited the Dali exhibition? The temporal location of some events may be very close to the moment NOW. Jones has played the organ in this church for fifteen years. If the definite time when the experience occurred is mentioned. already. without carrying any other information. they have constantly turned me down. A: And did you visit many places while you were there? B: Yes. By 'indefinite' we mean on the one hand.g. Continuative: also with event verbs if in the progressive: e. on and off) EXPERIENTIAL PRESENT PERFECT With process and event verbs phrases (accomplishments and achievements). this iterative use closely resembles the continuative use of the perfect and. last April. the perfect expresses a habit and thus has a recurrent continuative reading: Mrs.g. A: Have you been to Edinburgh? B: Yes. A: When did you go? B: Oh. the perfect may refer to some indefinite situation in the past. always. I have. I have lived in Paris simply places the situation at some unspecified point in the past. b) discontinuous continuative: He has been building the house for the last five years.Generally. b) limited experiential: Have you had a letter to type today?/ She has already had three proposals this morning. that the number of occurrences is unspecified and on the other hand. in fact. such use is often accompanied by adverbials of time of the type never. Modes of occurrence: a) continuous continuative: I have been sitting in all day. in which case we refer to recent indefinite past situations. In I've had a good life or You've outstayed your welcome the adverbials of time are felt as implicit ('during my life' / 'so far' or 'for too long' in the case of 'outstay'). yet or recently: Has the postman called yet? / They have already had breakfast. RESULTATIVE PRESENT PERFECT . ever. the speaker shifts from Present Perfect to Past Tense: e. I have followed her behavior every day since she got here. Such examples often contain adverbs like just. that’s when I did. (i. Used with process verb phrases and a frequency or a durative adverbial./ It has been snowing since noon.e./ Ever since the house has been occupied the poltergeist have been acting up. He’s been sleeping for two hours. Therefore. When I have tried to join their club. before (now): I have never seen such a majestic cathedral before.
until.) The use of either the perfect or the past in the above sentences is to be interpreted pragmatically. Consider the following examples of continuative. experiential and habitual perfect: She has been poor all her life. The common factor is the inclusion of the present in its analysis. (She is still alive. when the event in the subordinate occurs before the one in the main clause. / The plane has landed. but our knowledge of the world allows us to employ the appropriate tense. thus. The resultative meaning does not need the support of time adverbials: He has delivered the parcel. namely. Nepal has produced the world's greatest soldiers. (She is dead. On the other hand. Sparta produced Greece's greatest warriors. The simple past marks events assigned to a past that is concluded and completely separate from the present. The presence of the perfect simply places emphasis on the order of the events: I shall leave when I finish / I have finished. For generations.effect relationship. (Sparta no longer exists. In contrast. The temporal location of such situations is generally mentioned in the second sentence. PRESENT PERFECT AND SIMPLE PAST As already stated.) Hannibal brought / *has brought elephants across the Alps. Last week.) For generations. The period referred to is rather assumed than named. the club announced that it would trade midfielder Ion Radu to second-division club Valcea for two tons of beef and pork. 'HOT NEWS' PRESENT PERFECT The perfect is often used in newspapers and broadcasts. / He has recovered from his illness. March 1988) NB.that of Discourse Topic (defined as 'the subject matter under discussion in a certain context'). but even if it is not. when the events in the main clause and the subordinate temporally coincide. once.) She was poor all her life. the simple past is still employed at this point in the discourse: The struggling Romanian soccer club Jiul Petrosani has experienced what may be one of the more humiliating moments in recent sports history. (Nepal still exists. that presuppose a climax or end point.that is. (Newsweek. which afterwards are described using the past tense. we talk about Hannibal or Sparta in the past because we know they no longer exist. in those sentences that are semantically based on the cause . let us compare the various uses of the present perfect with the simple past. to introduce 'the latest' events. we use the present perfect: Come over and see us when our guests leave / have left.The association of event verb phrases (accomplishments and achievements). the simple present is favored. there are contexts in which the perfect is obligatory. This last observation relates to another notion . Discourse topics condition the use of the present perfect in the sense that only those covering a period of time that includes the moment of speaking can be expressed in sentences that employ present perfect. Similarly. whereas Nepal obviously has relevance for the present. with the perfect generates a resultative reading . it implies that a transition comes to a final state valid at the present moment. the present perfect either involves a period of time lasting up to the present or has results persisting at the present moment. etc. We say You will feel better after you have taken this pill if the pill conditions the well-being of the patient. In most cases the alternation of present simple and present perfect bears no significance. What differentiates them is their relation to the present. In such cases the present perfect is said to have a future value. when. Compare: . There is a special use of the present perfect instead of the simple present in adverbial clauses of time referring to the future introduced by after. especially in news reports. Bearing this in mind. present perfect and simple past resemble in that both express anteriority to a given moment in time.
The first sentence is appropriate if the discourse topic is 'great dramatists of the world' or 'impressive dramas in world literature'. Compare: Where did I put my gloves? to Where have I put my gloves? In the first example. English Morphology. *Shakespeare has quarreled with every playwright in London. II. while in the second he concentrates on the present moment and is only interested in where they are at present. If there is no time adverbial. The present perfect is less used in American English. this is used to initiate conversations. there are contexts in which the two tenses are interchangeable . when they describe recent events. the past tense is expected in (subordinate) clauses of time introduced by when. a clause introduced by when will trigger the use of a past tense in the main clause as well because the subordinate functions as a definite time adverbial: When did you last see him? I haven't seen him since we met at Jane's party. the speaker focuses on the moment when he misplaced his gloves. since.e.THEN]). TIME ADVERBIALS IN RELATION TO PRESENT PERFECT AND SIMPLE PAST Time adverbials (i. How much did you pay for it? I paid 15 $. I didn't recognize him / *haven't recognized him when I saw him. vol.that is. a fact which can be evaluated entirely only on the basis of contextual factors" (Ioana Stefanescu. Their alternation depends on the speaker's viewpoint. this tense requires the use of a definite time adverbial which locates the respective event at a certain point in the past. definite articles or personal pronouns): I have bought this bag in Cypress Street. Since it specifies a definite moment in the past. adverbs.Shakespeare has written impressive dramas. (definite time adverbial) I have already talked to him. 1988). resulting in different meanings. perhaps trying to remember what he was doing at the time. while the British say Have you met him yet? or I did it just now vs. indefinite (which are [-THEN]) and those that have both features (that is. discourse topic) is about Shakespeare as a person and his activities. But if the discussion (i. In spite of the differences mentioned so far. . etc. the second only with the perfect and the last with both. then 'definiteness' is retrieved by assumption of a particular time from the context or is justified by the preceding use of a past or perfect tense: We met yesterday. I've just received word that he isn't coming. (the past event is introduced by the perfect) Did you walk the dog? (said between husband and wife who refer to a particular time when the dog is usually walked) Contexts as that supplied by the second example also emphasize a characteristic of the present perfect. Americans tend to say Did you meet him yet?. Naturally. In conclusion. the present perfect is appropriate in all those uses in which the event described has relevance for the discourse topic. because such a topic would have relevance for the present moment. he came to ask me for money. while.e. because the time indicated by them is considered to be already given. "at the pragmatic level. The basic difference between present perfect and simple past stems from the contrast definite / indefinite. especially when it appears with recent indefinite past value. since it is only natural to start conversations indefinitely and then to carry on using definite linguistic expressions (be they the simple past. The first class combines only with the past. As already seen in the analysis of the simple past. adverbial phrases. they are [+/. adverbial clauses) classify into definite (bearing the feature [+THEN]. neither of the two sentences is correct since Shakespeare is dead.
for the time being. but if it is a numerical adverb that may contrast with twice or three times. it may be used with both tenses: I was happy once in this house. for phrases occur with both the perfect and the past. yet and before occur with the perfect if they mean 'as early / late as now' and with the past if interpreted as 'as early / late as then': I've already heard that piece.00. at 5 o'clock. still. I've seen the movie only once. lately. But it may also be a substitute for then and thus occur with past tense: Now my ambition was fulfilled. The difference lies in whether the event is viewed simply as a factor of experience obtaining at the moment of speech (with the present perfect) or within the context of the time at which it occurred (with past simple). The difference in use between just and just now is the following: just can take either past simple or present perfect: I have just seen your sister. the following adverbials are associated only with the present perfect: since. resulting in different interpretations. etc. so far.00 and got here at 12. etc. though since . up to now. hitherto. after lunch. ever. I left home at 8. Once appears with the simple past when it means 'on a certain occasion' or 'at one time'.) I didn't read the paper this morning.00 a. He hasn't done much work lately. Compare: I haven't read the paper this morning. soon. always combine with both tenses.phrases cannot be used with the simple past. Now is mainly associated with present tense: Now my ambition is/has been fulfilled. again depending on the context. a week / month / year ago. during these five years. I saw him on Sunday morning. for the present. Already. I saw her this July implies that July is over. / I just saw your sister. but I've seen her this July suggests that it is still July when I utter the sentence. when used with the past tense. while just now is interpreted as a moment/second/minute ago and occurs only with the past tense: I saw your sister just now. Apart from them. for now. ('as early as then') . as yet. then. ('as early as now') I was already fed up with that piece. We have been very busy so far. on Monday.m.00 p. I met him only once when I was in Spain. etc. next. Never. last night / Tuesday / week / month / year. They didn't speak to each other for three weeks. which most likely occur with the simple past.) Today. given the appropriate contexts: They haven't spoken to each other for three weeks. must be restricted to a past temporal frame as in: I never liked bananas when I was a child where the time clause supplies the background. they cannot occur with the present perfect (yesterday. the 'never' period.) behave in a similar way. but then they made up. On the other hand. there is the class of unanchored adverbs of the type in the evening.The definite adverbials of time point to a specific moment in the past. The third group of adverbials allows the use of both the perfect and the past. before now: I haven't been able to talk to him since I last saw him at the mall. (uttered at 6. It is interesting to notice that. although they do not make specific reference to it: He went out ten minutes ago.).m. for instance. (uttered at 10. tonight and all phrases with this (this afternoon / month / year / Christmas / March. having no relation to the present and hence.
until. past perfect has three values: continuative. By Friday they had already found a way to get rid of her. if the verb expresses an event. Mai mult ca perfect: always past perfect Past perfect: mai mult ca perfect. I had finished washing the clothes and I’d gone to bed early. he landed a very important job . (experiential) In Indirect Speech. If the verb expresses a state. perfect compus. the past perfect occurs in both main and subordinate clauses introduced by when. which acquires a past perfect meaning: When he came back from the States. / She said she went/had gone to the market the day before. Now I was anxious to go to school. past perfect may appear in narrative contexts. in which case it is said to have a pre-preterite value. In this sense. past perfect is the tense we obtain if in Direct Speech we have present perfect or past simple: I have laid the table. past perfect has two dimensions: (a) it parallels the semantics of present perfect. The past perfect can be substituted with the simple past. There are three reasons for which we attribute this value to past perfect: (a) its co-occurrence with [+then] adverbials (b) the fact that it is the equivalent of past simple in Direct Speech. In Indirect Speech. past perfect is optional: Yesterday I went to the market. THE PERFECT PROGRESSIVE FORMS . On the other hand. then past perfect is obligatory: Lily was here. like present perfect. (continuative) I had watched United lose twice that season. [-then] Susan knew John had left at 5. / She said Lily had been there. in which case past simple sets the scene and past perfect expresses what had happened before: That morning I was quite content. again unlike present perfect. [+then] Moreover. (c) the fact that it can be used in narratives to tell ‘a story within a story’. imperfect. after. NB. As already exemplified in the sentences above. I had written the essay the previous evening. she had already hidden it in a new place. / *She said Lily was there. he burned it. past perfect describes a past event that takes place before another past event or past moment: They found out where she had buried the treasure. In conclusion. NB. etc. (b) it is seen as a past tense that expresses past anteriority . She said she had laid the table. before. by the time.PAST PERFECT Past perfect may appear with both [+then] and [-then] adverbials. However. in some cases the substitution is semantically impossible: When he had read the letter / *when he read the letter. She said the show had finished two minutes before. (resultative) He had been at work for more than two hours. By the time they went to dig it up. resultative and experiential: Jim had dislocated his shoulder. unlike present perfect which combines only with [+/-then] and [-then] adverbials: They had been there since 5. The show finished two minutes ago.
Actually. it is certainly not the case of future events.that is. (The job is completed) I have been pumping up tires in the garage for the last quarter of an hour.It should be stated from the beginning that the use of the continuous aspect with the perfect forms is similar to the interaction of this aspect with other tense forms. Therefore. for instance. That's why you're tired. Thus. the only linguistic form that denotes a future event and has temporal sense alone .e. and for this reason. it does not reflect any attitude on the part of the speaker . etc. take place tomorrow. and these situations describe our attitude towards possible. plans. Apart from these meanings. English Morphology II. Again. state verb phrases of the locative type in the progressive develop a 'temporary or limited duration' meaning: I have been living in this castle for weeks now. it is in the very nature of predictions to describe what might happen in the future. It's time he woke up. in fact. possible courses of action. Finally. they are used to express future events. the perfect progressive also carries an emotive reading. Non-durative process verbs phrases (i. contain a future time implication: 1) Present Tense Simple 2) Present Tense Continuous 3) Be Going To 4) Future Tense Simple 5) Future Tense Continuous 6) Future Perfect (Simple and Continuous) PRESENT TENSE SIMPLE . beside their basic modal or aspectual quality. When they do. hence. event verb phrases (accomplishments and achievements) turn into processes and the completion / result meaning is suspended. to the sphere of modality or to the aspectual paradigm. are modal verbs denoting predictions. there are five other linguistic forms that. it may imply that the effects of a certain action are still apparent at present. Epistemic will and shall.is the simple present tense combined with a future time adverbial. Compare: I have pumped up three tires. even the most confident prognostication must indicate something of one speaker's attitude and so be tinged with modality" (Ioana Stefanescu. which have not happened yet and therefore merely translate into potential. the continuous aspect simply reinforces the idea of continuity of an activity: He's been sleeping since ten o'clock. we can express intentions. Process verb phrases in the present perfect have the tendency to appear in the progressive as well. 302). In fact. conveying 'irritation': You've been asking for money over and over again. quite often it is implied that the respective activity has just stopped: You've been walking too fast. MEANS OF EXPRESSING FUTURITY If present and past situations are conceived of as facts. the semelfactives) acquire an iterative meaning: She's been knocking at my window for two minutes. non-factual states of affairs. we can predict what will happen. pp. it is a matter that depends rather on the aspectual class of the verb phrase. Apart from the simple present. all epistemic uses of the modal verbs refer to people's present attitudes with respect to the future time sphere: The meeting can / may / must / shall / will. it is no surprise that almost all the linguistic forms that express future time belong. (I haven't finished the job yet) Although the perfect progressive never refers to a 'present result'. 1988. on the contrary. promises or threats that we mean to carry out in the future. When combined with the progressive. The activity described by the verbal form does not necessarily carry on at present. It is only natural for future events / states to have modal or aspectual implications since "we cannot be as certain of future happenings as we are of events past and present.
In the first example we interpret Hillary as the agent who has deliberately made this plan. Since such arrangements are supposed to be unalterable. etc. the second example sounds absurd because the sunrise can't be planned. involving conscious human agency. like statements about the calendar. the present continuous refers only to very definite arrangements. Compare: Hillary is rising at 6. and thus is always accompanied by a future time expression: Are you going to the auction tomorrow? Yes. set off. come. the suggestion of imminence of these constructions. while the going to form is used in a wider variety of contexts and not necessarily with a time adverbial. leave. The reasoning behind such structures would be: "If X is a fact. depart. unless reference time is provided by the context (like. the continuous present signals a future event anticipated by virtue of a present plan. etc.As already discussed in the chapter on the values of the simple present. When I grow up. it is easy to understand why they are normally collective or impersonal . We attribute to such sentences the same degree of certainty we would attribute to present or past events. At the same time. they exist in as far as we make reference to remote future events determined in advance: I'm taking Mary shopping tomorrow. then I predict Y. end. The verbs that enter such constructions are generally verbs of 'doing'. committees. On the other hand. Future events expressed by means of the simple present are assumed to take place without fail. not as a prediction. programs or itineraries regarded as immutable: Tomorrow is Friday. There is an entire range of verbs commonly used in such contexts. *The sun is rising at 6. hence.00 tomorrow to prepare breakfast for the kids.' Similarly. / We leave for Brasov tomorrow morning.00 tomorrow. generally aiming at the near rather than the distant future. in a narrative sequence). I'm joining the fire brigade. However. I'm going. this tense denotes the future either in subordinate clauses of time and condition or in main clauses. program or arrangement. If we consider that the simple present with future value describes a definite occasion in the future in the same way the simple past refers to a definite occasion in the past. schedules or organized events: start. since they express an arrangement or an intention. we might say that the simple present with future value presents the highest degree of certainty as to the occurrence of a certain action in the future. He's getting married in September. arrive. go. it is obvious that the continuous present with future value will not combine with state verbs normally incompatible with the progressive aspect. not possible future events. Therefore. mostly in the near future. reinforced by the presence of the purpose clause 'to prepare breakfast for the kids'. begin. but I'm not going to buy anything. we have an explanation for the obligatory presence of the future time adverbial in such sentences. a court of law. The continuous present with future value is close in meaning to the going to form. for instance. therefore. it is determined by natural law. / School starts on Monday / next week. being generally accompanied by a future time adverbial. in fact. this does not mean that there are no present progressive sentences referring to the remote future. verbs associated with announcements about timetables. PRESENT TENSE CONTINUOUS When used with future value. constructions with the simple present describing a future event are restricted to certain areas. the simple present in main clauses denotes future facts.made by official authorities. In contrast. which is. The presence of the simple present instead of a will / shall construction in the subordinate is justified by the fact that the situation contained in this clause is taken as a given fact. .
the expectation that this will happen is stronger than in the latter. Going to can be paraphrased by intend. I'm not going to do it again. Going to with the first meaning is restricted to human. The kind of verbs admitted in such structures are. What are you going to do with the money? I've reminded you once. Though its nature brings it closer to the idea of imminence. I think I'm going to cry. again. express their intentions.that of 'future fulfillment of present cause' . I'll telephone for them now. Sit down by the fire and I'll make you some tea.We might consider that there is a slight difference of emphasis between the two structures in a pair like: I'm going to have lunch with Jim tomorrow. verbs of 'doing' ('agentive' verbs) that imply conscious exercise of the will. yet. Are you going to redecorate your kitchen? You look frozen. The first sentence reflects the speaker's present state of mind and it may well be the case that Jim has no idea about the speaker's plan. I forgot. Very often either of the two can be used. Did you remember to book seats? / Oh no. or at least animate subjects endowed with will that can.is less restrictive both in point of subject choice and choice of verb class. There's going to be a riot in this village. Thus. and when it is clearly unpremeditated we use will + infinitive: I've hired a typewriter and I am going to learn to type. BE GOING TO The general meaning attached to this linguistic form is that of 'future fulfillment of the present'. we employ the going to form. In all the above examples the underlying assumption is that factors already at work at present are inevitably leading to a certain future state of affairs. but with a slight difference in meaning. hence the implication that both the speaker and Jim know about it. and not state verbs: The detective is going to ask you a few questions. going to can be used to refer to periods remote from the moment of speaking: I am going to be a teacher when I grow up. It's going to rain. thus. I'm going to participate in the board meeting tomorrow is distinct from I intend to participate in the board meeting tomorrow in the sense that the former has a higher degree of certainty. The second meaning of going to . We should distinguish between the going to expressing intention and the will + infinitive construction having the same meaning. . the subject can be either animate or inanimate and the expression can occur with both 'agentive' and 'non-agentive' / 'state' verbs: She is going to have a baby next month. this extends to two more specific meanings: 'future fulfillment of present intention' and "future fulfillment of present cause'. I'm having lunch with Jim tomorrow. It is only the second sentence that the speaker could offer as an excuse for not joining a friend for a game of snooker. For instance. A lot of paint was delivered here today. a sentence like It's going to rain would be uttered if the speaker saw black clouds already gathering in the gloomy sky. The second sentence refers to an arrangement already made in the past. when the intention is clearly premeditated.
speculations and assumptions about the future (used after verbs such as doubt. They'll find out about your plans tonight. . If the first sentence makes a prediction. The future simple is mainly present in newspapers and on TV in news broadcasts when formal announcements or announcements about the weather are made. 'Current orientation' going to contrasts with prediction will to the extent that the going to form carries this sense of inevitability. etc. In fact. Birds will start to sing when spring comes. in everyday conversation the listener will use other means of expressing such future events. The soup is going to cool soon. believe. think. cognitive verbs. refusals. I'm sure / I suppose they won't agree to our project. They are also specific of sentences with subordinates of condition and time. etc. FUTURE TENSE SIMPLE There is no future tense in modern English. Students must take into account the fact that shall and will also have other modal meanings (see chapter on Modal Verbs). such as the going to form or the present continuous for plans: Newspaper: The Queen will visit the southern part of the country tomorrow. counseling patience. modal verbs that express prediction. it will smash into pieces. Compare: The soup will cool soon. Those verbs not normally used in the progressive will combine with the simple future: verbs of perception. You'll have plenty of time to finish your book. etc.): Perhaps I'll find another teacher after this. it is easy to understand why going to refers to the immediate future and is also named 'current orientation' be going to: Look out! The glass is going to fall! ('I can see it already tottering'). and still refer to a future event. I will know him when I see him. He'll be there by tomorrow.Bearing this in mind. hurry and eat it before it cools. In American English it is used in formal contexts: We shall never surrender to the terrorists. I expect the train will be late. verbs of possession. they can express promises. They may express the speaker's opinions. expect. but for convenience shall and will combined with the bare infinitive are designated as future tense simple. threats. therefore something that involves the speaker's judgment and is directly related to the future time sphere. Shall has a neutral predictive meaning only when used with the first person singular or plural: I shall never have the opportunity to thank him. in which case the main clause contains the future structure and the subordinate employs a simple present (see chapter on the values of the simple present): If I throw this plate against the wall. hope. Shall / will with predictive meaning appear in various contexts. Reader: The Queen is visiting / is going to visit the southern part of the country tomorrow. perhaps. the second should be interpreted as a warning for the addressee to. Shall and will are. in fact.
m. The gardener won't be cutting the grass for some time. they simply suggest a prediction. they'll be changing the guard in a minute and you'll get a good view. again in the future. I'd better move the computer in my room. There is a contrast between future tense continuous and present tense continuous with future value: He is seeing the doctor tomorrow. Compare: I'll phone mum and tell her about your plans. as I've got a lot of other jobs for him to do first. I'll be phoning mum and I'll tell her about your plans. the modals in themselves do not express future time. future tense continuous matches the patterns of the present or past continuous: This time next week I'll be teaching them grammar.00 p. This use eliminates any idea of intention.m. He'll be seeing the doctor tomorrow. Thus. Similarly. in the future) or to a temporary arrangement. tomorrow. It is the adverbial that places this prediction in time. tomorrow. I'll be giving a lesson at 3. The first example suggests that he has deliberately arranged a meeting with the doctor. As already mentioned. FUTURE TENSE CONTINUOUS As it combines with the progressive aspect. in the second example the speaker implies that the talk on the phone will take place either as a matter of routine or for reasons that have nothing to do with the interlocutor's plans. We can make even a further distinction between the two if we compare: I'm giving a lesson at 3. whereas the second suggests that the lesson may have already begun and is in progress at the respective time. It suggests that the event predicted by shall / will will occur independently of the will of the people involved in it as part of the ordinary course of events or as a matter of routine. He says that it is perfectly all right as it is. . The first sentence states that the lesson will begin at the time mentioned. On the other hand. this structure will naturally refer either to an activity in progress at a specific point in time (i.00 p. future tense continuous has a special meaning that applies to a single event viewed in its entirety and not as going on at a point around which it creates a temporal frame. In fifty years' time we'll be living entirely on pills. in both cases. The gardener won't cut down the tree. When I get home my dog will be sitting at the door waiting for me.Generally. That is why this tense has been labeled 'future-as-a-matter-of-course': Stand here. I'll be working in there next week. the opposition is between a future with intention and a future without intention. won't cut denotes a refusal. while the second example implies that their meeting is part of the ordinary course of events (perhaps they work or do business together). while won't be cutting suggests that the gardener's program requires otherwise. we can contrast future tense continuous with the will + infinitive construction as well as their negative counterparts. volition or plan. shall / will + infinitive does not appear without a time adverbial for obvious reasons. Apart from these normal uses. otherwise the sentence is factually empty.e. In this respect. there is no point in saying *it will rain without mentioning when it will happen. In the first sentence the speaker announces a deliberate future action that will occur as a result of his wishes.
FUTURE PERFECT TENSE SIMPLE / CONTINUOUS These structures are used to denote future events that take place before other future events or before a certain future moment. When the focus does not concentrate on the result.In interrogative constructions. we use the progressive form: By the end of the day I will have been working for ten hours. The police will have heard of the theft by this time. which are both formal (to be to. to be ready to. On October 21st they will have been married for twenty-five years. the use of future tense continuous renders the question neutral. to be about to and to be due to) and colloquial (to be on the point of. She said she would call me later that week. are quite common in everyday speech. They were leaving town the next day. FUTURE -IN-THE-PAST FORMS In case sentences have a past time axis. In He is to return to England tomorrow the most likely meaning is that he . will + infinitive can express an invitation. of course. Idioms such as 'You'll be losing your head one of these days' or 'Whatever will he be doing next?' suggesting comic exasperation. If be going to is considered the most common form used to express future in the past. they occur with a time expression beginning with by: By the end of the term I will have read all the twelve volumes. this use has been speculated in colloquial English with humorous or ironic effects. violent or abnormal events. to be near to. would is preferred in literary style. (repeated action) Future perfect can also be used to express an assumption on the part of the speaker: You won't have heard the news. On the other hand. as they cannot be interpreted as part of a routine: * The terrorists will be killing the President tomorrow. Generally. Still. all the future time expressions are modified according to the change of context and indicate future in the past situations. but rather on the continuity of the action. there are restrictions in the use of this linguistic form. a request or a command. It cannot describe sudden. bearing no imposition on the part of the speaker: Will you please take the dog out for a walk? (request) Will you be taking the dog out for a walk? (question only) Since they are more polite and more tactful and do not put pressure on the addressee. to be on the verge of / on the brink of). (continuous action) By the end of the month he will have been teaching students for a year. This happens either in narratives or when applying indirect / reported speech rules: He was going to tell her what we had done. To be to is similar in meaning to have to / ought to and describes formal arrangements made as a result of an order / command. OTHER FUTURE TIME EXPRESSIONS There are other ways of referring to the future. such structures have become more frequent in every day conversation.
possibility. May in a sentence like You may go now. When it denotes an official arrangement or plan. permission. it is similar to the simple present with future value. duty . MODAL VERBS Modality refers to notions like possibility.the rational laws of deduction – probability. biology. appropriateness etc. order.m. chemistry.no co-occurrence (*I must can do it.inversion with the subject (May I borrow your car?) .) . it suggests possibility. necessity. whereas in He may be there already. (deontic ought to combines with the perfect infinitive to suggest past time reference) CAN / COULD .35 a. indicates permission. He can play the violin. The less developed modals do not observe it: You should be listening to what your sister is saying.has received explicit order to go back there. command.the social or institutional laws .no non-finite forms such as infinitives. it will be noticed later that the rule holds true only for the most important modal verbs (may. but then we imagine that things are different and in this way we talk about possible worlds. certainty. can and must). To be due to refers to scheduled times: The ceremony is due to begin in ten minutes.) Modals are polysemous words. *musted) . Modal verbs evince two basic meanings: . impossibility.the natural laws of physics. vs. To be about to and to be on the point of both refer to imminent actions and the former is used to replace the more colloquial going to in formal contexts: I think the play is about to start now. (deontic should combines with the continuous infinitive to suggest an action in progress at the moment of speaking) You ought to have paid closer attention to your guests. Modal verbs are a syntactically defined subset of auxiliary verbs with specific properties: . these modalities refer to duty. There are 3 general systems of principles that can be invoked when we talk about modality: . . Deontic forms do not take the progressive. The difference in meaning is reflected in their different syntactic behaviors. referring to modalities that define the notion of physical and intellectual ability/capacity. impossibility .3rd person: defective (compare: I can play the piano. Epistemic forms co-occur with the continuous infinitive to suggest an action in progress and with the perfect infinitive for past time reference and have no restrictions on the subject. The chairman of the board meets union officials tonight. anatomy etc. past or present participles (*to may.legal authority/institution or one's social status according to which you have or you don’t have authority over somebody else. The problem of polysemy: there is a syntactic approach based on the idea that the distinct meanings of the same modal are reflected in their distinct distribution. do not occur with the perfect infinitive and their subject is always [+ human]. / I am just on the point of proposing to her. it can retain its future meaning even when it is not accompanied by a future time adverbial: The chairman of the board is to meet union officials (tonight). / His flight is due at 7. we experience certain states of affairs in the real world. Though it proves to be a very felicitous distinction. unlike the latter. impossibility. *canning. except that.epistemic sense: possibility.negative with not (You can’t throw plates at him!) .deontic (root) sense: ability. compulsion.
be it written or spoken. Do you hear the wind blowing? / Can you hear the wind blowing? Each pair of sentences has the same translation (Vad randunelele zburand sus pe cer. . we encounter the opposite phenomenon. Was/were able to refers to the actual performance of a single successful achievement.to be able to. understand. I can / *am able to swim. (sarcastic suggestion). Permission can has an additional pragmatic interpretation in sentences like: You can forget about your holiday. The second meaning of deontic can is that of permission. Deontic can has two past forms: could and was / were able to. However. unlike may which is employed when an authority gives you permission.DEONTIC CAN Deontic can expresses physical or mental ability. being perceived as the more respectable form. and Auzi cum sufla vantul?). / I can see the swallows flying up in the sky. remember. In this respect. referring to potential acts.general permanent ability) Look. though this context does not rule out the use of can: Mary has now recovered from her illness and is able to / can go to school. there is no rule or law that prevents you from performing a certain action. In interrogations the use of can to request permission is simply a matter of courtesy. However. Can is more widely employed than 'permission' may in colloquial English. when making a decision at the moment of speaking about some event in the future. May replaces can in all contexts. (generic) When he moved closer to the painting. taste. In other words. to be able to has a specific meaning. / He can be nasty. Similarly.now) Can is used in parallel with a synonymous expression having a fuller range of forms . Compare: He could play the piano very well when he was a child. smell. (strong recommendation) or You can jump in the lake if you feel like it. When used with verbs of physical perception can actualizes the reference of the verb. couldn’t will always imply that the event didn’t take place. There is no difference between could and to be able to in negative sentences. (El stie sa vorbeasca engleza. can is commonly used with verbs of perception (see. / Frenchmen can be arrogant. He can speak English. In formal and polite English. Maybe we can go fishing next week. Can is also often used to express sporadic ability or an irregular pattern of behavior: She can be quite catty. he was able to / *he could see that it was a fake. In contrast. (particular) On the other hand. not real ones. To be able to is never used when referring to something going on at the moment of speaking (see example above). describing generic ability. (Pot sa inot. You can go home when you have finished writing your essay. the hearer is not usually in a position to deny permission: Can I leave now? / Can I have the salt? Negative sentences use either cannot or may not to refuse permission: . Policeman: You may park here. To be able to refers to some event that will be possible in the future. the use of can suggests that 'you have permission' rather than 'I give you permission'. feel) and cognitive verbs of the type believe. Apart from replacing can in contexts for which the modal has no forms. we use can: I hope they will be able to book seats for the concert tomorrow. Compare: Old man: You can park here as far as I know. Ability in the future is expressed by means of either can or the periphrastic shall/will be able to with a difference in meaning. . can is like an aspectual marker (often not translated): I see the swallows flying up the sky. and in certain contexts we do distinguish between the uses of the two. could is used to express a habitual or recurrent event in the past. hear. To be able to is preferred when referring to a specific achievement.
but the verb inside has past time reference. with the approval of the Minister. Unfortunately. . we can establish a distinction between can and may in affirmative sentences if we conceive of them in terms of the opposition factual vs. not the speaker's. he could join us. whereas in affirmative sentences may is preferred: He may be reading in the library. In questions. (It is possible to devalue the dollar. While cannot expresses the impossibility of some action to occur (appearing in cases of external negation). Since the example above refers specifically to the powers a certain official is endowed with. but to a real contingency. Can he be reading in the library? He can't be reading in the library. For past time reference may is replaced by to be allowed to. MAY / MIGHT DEONTIC MAY Deontic may is used to grant or give permission when the speaker has the authority to do so (see comparison to permission can above).You may not leave yet. receive from persons to which advice is given under this section… such charges. Could he have spread that vicious rumor about the twins? In this case.factual possibility) When uttered. Compare: The dollar can be devalued. Roughly speaking. The nurse said we might speak to the patient. When permission is denied. (It is possible that the dollar is devalued. being similar to must. theoretical possibility. so the distinction persists only in colloquial English.theoretical possibility) The dollar may be devalued. (external negation) (it is not possible that he saw the light of the car) He may not arrive in time. There is no past time for permission can with the exception of could used as a past tense form in reported speech: He said I could leave the next day. (if any) as the authority consider reasonable. the modal has present time reference. (internal negation) (it is possible that he does not arrive in time) For past time reference epistemic can combines with the perfect infinitive like any other epistemic modal: He can't have had time to hide the evidence. may not suggests the possibility of something not happening (illustrating cases of internal negation): If he saw a light it can’t have been the light of the car. / She said that. such as a time of financial crisis. EPISTEMIC CAN Epistemic can expresses the possibility/impossibility of an action to take place. the speaker uses either may not or must not if the authority prohibits some action (You may not visit that family. its semantic content accounts for the presence of permission may. . Permission may is also present in rules and regulations in formal English: A local health authority may. / You must not speak to her again!). the second seems to be more forceful because it is interpreted as positively forbidding an action instead of negatively refusing permission. in formal English may seems to be used to express both factual and theoretical possibility. whereas in reported speech might is used: I was eventually allowed to go abroad to visit my relatives. (I oblige you no to talk loudly in this auditorium) Though both sentences represent prohibitions. the second sentence should be taken more seriously because it does not refer to a mere possibility that has occurred to the speaker. may signals the hearer's authority. . (I do not permit you to leave…) You mustn't talk loudly in this auditorium. It is more frequent in negations and interrogations. if he wanted.
epistemic may does not occur in interrogative sentences. Although you are in charge. . In this respect. When employed with its deontic meaning. the speaker imposes something on himself through a sense of duty or self-discipline. a sentence like A friend may betray you is interpreted more like a warning about a particular friend. so that we talk about selfcompulsion. using may for present reference and might for past reference: Try as I might. HAVE (GOT) TO DEONTIC MUST / HAVE (GOT) TO The relationship between must and have to parallels that between may and can in both their deontic and epistemic meanings. In this case the truth of the sentence or its falsity can be verified. focusing primarily on specific situations. You have to make up a plan before you start. I might well decide to come. I might just start to trust you. epistemic may is used to express possibility. (external obligation .I have my own program and I want to stick to it) I have to finish writing the essay by tonight. I couldn't push the door open. it resembles 'permission' may. When combined with the perfect infinitive. As already suggested. (neutral) You must return all the books to the library by Friday. the speaker says what somebody else requires or it can point to the speaker who is in some position of authority and imposes a duty. On the other hand. He can't have already discovered the secret of that tomb. there is an idiomatic expression with try. it is simply directed towards the speaker himself. (NB. can basically focuses on general situations. the theoretical . but this doesn't give you the right to be rude. for instance.EPISTEMIC MAY As already mentioned above. we notice that the idea of compulsion is not lost. he can never remember people's names. and hence. Must has either neutral reference when. (the speaker is in authority) When we consider the first person singular or plural (I must / we must). In a sentence like A friend can betray you it is suggested that friends sometimes do that. Try as he may. this doesn't give you the right to be rude. For instance.factual possibility opposition disappears. may / might refer to events in the past: He may have already discovered the secret of that tomb. Also. MUST.) May with the sense of 'possibility' also appears in concessive clauses in colloquial English as an alternative to an although clause: You may be in charge. must expresses obligation. (internal obligation . May / might as well expresses the idea that there is no alternative left to a bad situation: We might as well give up now because we don't stand a chance if we fight against them.the teacher wants the essays tomorrow morning) Have to / have got to have either neutral or external orientation as to the source of obligation: I’ve got to be at London airport at 4. May / might combines with several adverbs that emphasize the modal expression with both present and past time reference. where can is preferred. This contrasts with the use of have to (I have to / we have to) which suggests that some external authority imposes the duty: I must finish writing the essay by tonight. The university says: These people must be expelled if they disrupt lectures.
Have to also expresses logical necessity: There has to be someone who knows the truth about his disappearance. Oh. For past time reference must combines with the perfect infinitive like all the other epistemic modals: He must have been flying too low. (You are not obliged to answer that question. paralleling the may . (It is impossible that everyone is telling the truth. not the speaker’s: Must I sweep the floor and wash the dishes myself? (= Are these your orders?) There is an even more restricted use of must in interrogatives with 'you' as subject that conveys a note of sarcasm: Must you really smoke those horrible cigars? In a sentence like If you must smoke.) Someone has to be hiding the truth.can situation: Someone must be hiding the truth. necessity is questioned in: Have you got to do it? / Do you have to do it? / Need I say more? There seems to be a difference between do you have to and have you got to in the sense that the former has a habitual or iterative meaning. you get to knowledge by inference or reasoning. The negative counterpart of epistemic must is can’t . (the event took place) As already seen. *having got to). the speaker pretends to interpret the hearer's need to smoke as something he cannot control rather than as a nasty habit he enjoys practicing. go to the window. (It is impossible for everyone to be telling the truth. have to is used for past time reference replacing must. whereas needn't or don't have to negate the necessity (external negation): You mustn’t reveal what I’ve said. Have got to is rarer in the past and does not imply that the event referred to took place. (it was necessary…) We had to make a trip to York to collect the bloody thing. / We’ll have to go out if you’re going to do it. I don't see any explanation for the crash. Subject-oriented must needs no past tense (must is different from have to only in the present). have to is stronger than must in the sense that it does not refer to a mere assumption or deduction. have got to is characteristic of colloquial British English and is more restricted in use because of its lack of nonfinite forms (*will have got to. it suggests that the possibility of the opposite state of affairs cannot be conceived of. unlike have to: We’d got to make a trip to York anyway so it didn’t matter too much. having to). whereas the have to example expresses a downright accusation. You have to have made some mistake here. The must example above is interpreted as a simple suspicion. the evidence is such as to imply the truth of the sentence. it is the hearer’s authority that is involved. which is again extremely ironical. Again the difference between epistemic must and epistemic have to is that between factual necessity and theoretical necessity.the “natural expression of impossibility”: She must be over 40.Students have to be careful with their grades. When must is used in interrogative as well as in conditional clauses. (I oblige you not to reveal what I've said) You needn’t answer that question. While have to is used in formal language and has non-finite forms (will have to.) EPISTEMIC MUST / HAVE (GOT) TO Epistemic must expresses logical necessity. Like the other modals must is used for future events: We must do something about it tomorrow. Must appears as such with past time reference only in reported speech: She said she must/had to go. she can’t./ BE You must be joking. Otherwise. Consider: Do you have to be at school at 8 o'clock? (Is this what you have to do every day?) Have you got to be at school at 8 o'clock? (Is this what you have to do tomorrow morning?) In negative sentences must not negates the event indicating the obligation not to perform some action (internal negation).) Thus. Shall/will have to is used if there is a suggestion that the necessity is future or conditioned: I shall have to keep silent for an hour. while the latter refers to a specific occasion. Otherwise. WILL / WOULD DEONTIC WILL / WOULD VOLITION WILL . In American English have got to has acquired an epistemic interpretation: AE You’ve got to be joking.
The idea of willingness is commonly related to second . strong volitional will is never contracted to 'll and always stressed in speech. When volitional will is negated. The door won’t open. Since it has such an emphatic meaning. Volitional would is used in adverbial clauses of condition and after wish. *I asked him and he would come. but wouldn’t is normal. how they characteristically behave. For past time reference we use power would. I shall have a cake. For past time reference with subject-oriented will the form would is NOT used if there is an accomplished interpretation for the event. so I can’t work. which parallels volition would but retains an inanimate subject (She asked if the table would bear. Would in such questions is even more polite: Would you kindly tell me … / Would you be good enough… / Would you like to …? This type of volition will is also present in conditional clauses in the second and third persons: If you will say so. You know that certain drugs will improve your condition.Volition will relates to either willingness (weak volition) or insistence (strong volition) or intention (intermediate volition). don't complain that she's avoiding you. I won’t have my name on the title page. Unlike volition will whose subject is always a person or at least an animal endowed with willpower. you will. why will you keep asking stupid questions? If you will ask her out every time you see her.) HABITUAL WILL Habitual will refers to a situation that takes place regularly or frequently as a consequence of a natural tendency of a person or an object: . Instead. Strong volitional will shows one's determination or intention to do something: I will see him today if that's what I want! 'I won't do it!' / 'Yes. But she loves him and she won’t leave him. POWER WILL Power will expresses properties of certain objects. being more conditional than will. The last two examples that employ second and third persons clearly imply that the speaker is exasperated at the interlocutors' stubbornness. I asked him but he wouldn’t come. honey. power will employs inanimate subjects and is subject-oriented (the source of power is intrinsic to the subject of will): The hall will seat five hundred. I shan’t be happy unless she will come.person requests of the type: Will you bring me a glass of water? Who will tell me what I've done wrong? In such questions will is a polite variant of the imperative for the 2nd and the 3rd persons. volitional be willing to is more likely: I asked him and he was willing to come. it expresses a strong refusal: They won’t give me a key.' Sandy. The third type of intermediate will occurs mainly with the first person expressing a promise or a threat and is usually contracted: I will pay him back for what he's done to me! We'll cut your allowance if you refuse to listen to us! We'll see about that when he returns.
for past reference combining with the perfect infinitive and acquiring a contrary-to-fact interpretation: You should pay more attention to what I'm telling you right now. You shall never hear from me again. John will have received the book by this time. then we use will in combination with the perfect infinitive: This will be the National Gallery. This imperious kind of shall. the sense of obligation being rendered in the form of a suggestion or piece of advice. Generally speaking must could replace will in all the examples above with only a slight difference in meaning as to the degree of certainty of the respective prediction: John must be in his office. can suggest either a promise or a threat on the part of the speaker. SHALL / SHOULD DEONTIC SHALL / SHOULD The deontic meaning of shall is that of obligation. The first condition of legal justice is that it shall hold the balance impartially. A cat will often play with a mouse before killing it. Shall you see John today? When shall you do it? Deontic should is a weaker equivalent of deontic shall. In modern English we use must. used with second and third person subjects. In interrogations that employ the first person the speaker inquires about the wish or will of the addressee. Epistemic will is like epistemic must in the sense that the conclusion is reached on the basis of the evidence available. John will be in his office. that is why used to can combine with both state and activity verbs. EPISTEMIC WILL / WOULD Epistemic will is related to the idea of probability. For past time reference we employ either would or used to with the difference that used to does not have the sense of an iterated situation. therefore. unlike would whose usage is restricted to activity verbs only: He used to live in that house in those days.A falling drop will hollow a stone. Should has present and future reference. in the Bible and in legal statements or rules: He shall be punished if he does not obey. the inference concerning the present time as it involves a present situation. Boys will be boys. He would (often) buy strawberries in those days / whenever she came. Shall I go? represents an offer to go (Do you want me to go?) Used with the second person shall describes a situation which is independent of the will of the person addressed. not the will of the subject of the sentence ( shall is speaker-oriented). You shall receive a reward if you follow my advice. we infer that John is in his office). That will be John at the door. shall is an archaic form of order still present in fairy tales. it is distinct from will you? which inquires about the other person’s will or willingness. If there is reference to a past situation. however. it is the will of the speaker who imposes an obligation. (I can see the lights on). (from previous knowledge why the lights were on. . She’ll be sleeping now.
You should have told me that you were hungry.) You ought to give some money to your sister. of which perhaps not one shall fall upon fertile ground and grow into a fair plant. you should be sent to Siberia for what you've done. Assumptions with epistemic should are less confident than assumptions with epistemic will. He should have finished by now means that 'I expect he has finished by now'. (Perkins. when used with a first person subject. but if he says I must go slowly here. Who touches pitch shall be defiled. OUGHT TO Very close in interpretation to should. The parcel should have arrived by now. since there is evidence that leads him to the respective conclusion.If I could have my way. the use of ought to implies that the speaker is not very certain the addressee will perform his duty. The general meaning of epistemic shall is that ‘someone /something is disposed towards something’. whereas He will have finished by now suggests that 'I am sure he has finished'. Moreover. he really intends to go slowly. It is used for assumptions about present or past situations (if combined with the perfect infinitive): The plane should be landing now. again its meaning is related to that of epistemic must: Susan ought to be at her office now. Compare: You must give some money to your sister. denoting obligation or duty. EPISTEMIC OUGHT TO Epistemic ought to expresses potential probability. the implication is that the obligation will not be fulfilled. in fact. NEED / NEED TO . (I am sure you will. (But. The must variant reflects the speaker's certainty that his deduction is correct. you didn't) EPISTEMIC SHALL / SHOULD Shall is interpreted epistemically when its modal base is the system of rational laws and where the empirical evidence implies the truth of the sentence: A flower shall produce thousands of seeds. unlike must. 1983) Epistemic should is considered the conditional equivalent of epistemic shall. We may say He ought to go but he won’t but an utterance like He must go but *he won’t is impossible. The ought to variant reflects the speaker's cautiousness in asserting that as he also takes into account that there is a slight possibility that something unexpected might have happened to require her presence somewhere else. DEONTIC OUGHT TO Deontic ought to is similar in meaning to must. with a single difference: while must suggests that the speaker is confident the interlocutor will do as told. ought to represents a tentative counterpart of must and shall. Susan must be at her office now. ought to gives the possibility of non-action. (But I don't know whether you will or not) Hence. For past time reference ought to selects the perfect infinitive: You ought to have been more careful with the children. he implies that he isn't going to go slowly. If a driver says I ought to go slowly here.
but as formed in the mind of the speaker as a desire. sometimes with little or no hope or faith. volition. sometimes with more or less hope of realization. in the case of a statement. THE SUBJUNCTIVE MOOD Whereas the indicative expresses facts and is closely related to reality. When we refer to a past situation. Modal need is mainly used in negative and interrogative sentences as a correlative of must. commentaries about theoretical or desirable situations or commands aimed at making somebody bring about a certain state of affairs. the action is no longer performed. the subjunctive is prescriptive." (George Curme. Need not expresses lack of necessity similarly to the negative forms of have to or need to. Yet. At the same time. I just need some money. relating facts to moments in real time. except in fairly formal English with hardly. thus resembling shouldn't have and oughtn't have in as far as in all three cases the event does take place: You needn't have carried all this luggage by yourself. which means 'I suppose': I daresay the plane will be delayed. 1935:391) While the indicative is informative. thought. forms questions and negative forms with do). In reported speech need is retained just like must: She believed she need not fear any persecution. DARE Dare resembles need to a great extent in that it has both modal and lexical variants and it also occurs in interrogative and negative sentences. I needn't have driven to school to pick up Mary but I had forgotten she'd told me she had other plans. with more or less belief. conception. Modal need doesn’t occur in ‘affirmative’ sentences. The subjunctive expresses value judgments. Lexical need occurs with a (passive) infinitive or a noun / pronoun object or a gerund: I need to know what time you'll get home. Students must pay attention to the distinct grammatical properties of dare as modal and lexical verb: John daren’t come. or. wish. the subjunctive "represents something not as actual reality. and only rarely in statements. scarcely or only: I need hardly mention how grateful I am for this opportunity. / Does John dare to come? In the affirmative dare is used in the expression I daresay / I dare say. / Dare John come? John doesn’t dare to come. need (a fi necesar) and need to (a avea nevoie) differ in point of grammatical behavior since the former is a modal verb and the latter a full lexical verb (which. . You need only touch one of the doors for the alarm to start ringing. the choice is between didn't have to and didn't need to (the lexical verb). it indicates a theoretically possible or potential course of events that the world may take. consequently. in this case it expresses an unnecessary action which was nevertheless performed. They differ in that the former implies that the action does take place. In How dare(d) you? / How dare(d) he / they?. I didn't have / need to pick up Mary from school because she phoned me saying she would walk home. the speaker expresses indignation at the actions of the interlocutor: How dare you shout at me? At the same time. while the latter implies that as a consequence of this lack of necessity. (lack of necessity) What needn't have done and didn't have / need to do have in common is the lack of necessity.Although they are close in meaning. needn't also occurs with the perfect infinitive to refer to a past situation. lexical dare has an additional meaning ('to challenge') if used transitively and followed by object + full infinitive: Somebody dared me to jump off the bridge into the river. The gas tank needs to be refilled / refilling.
I would have drowned in the sea. he would fail all his exams. It's rather late. However. If one situation depends on another. (hypothetical situation) They wouldn't have come to the meeting if they hadn't been invited. TO BE has WERE for all persons) and had + third form of the verb for the past subjunctive . not all negative if sentences can be turned into unless sentences: They wouldn't have come to the meeting unless they had been invited. All of them have present and past forms. (hypothetical past situation) An alternative to the last example is a structure introduced by unless (= only if not) always followed by the verb in the affirmative. At the same time. if it hadn't been for (for past reference) or but for. I had better leave now. SYNTHETIC SUBJUNCTIVE . the synthetic subjunctive classifies into an old subjunctive and a new one." where British English uses the analytic subjunctive . but this requires the use of the gerund: I prefer reading to writing. I'll give you a call.NEW FORMS The new forms of the synthetic subjunctive . if can be followed by modal verbs that preserve their original meaning in these contexts: should. on condition that or as long as. If I don't come back in time. But for her ambition. would and could. Apart from the subjunctive forms mentioned so far."It's important that you should go there. I won't scold you again as long as you behave nicely. I would rather have lived in the country. Would rather can be replaced by prefer. she wouldn't have managed to overcome that situation. In its turn. the most widely used being should). all followed by noun phrases: If it weren't for your interest in his studies. Should after if.OLD FORMS The old subjunctive is used in formulas and after would rather (expressing preference) and had better (interpreted as suggestion or advice): Long live the Queen! So be it! Come what may! Grammar be hanged! I would rather go to the mountains than to the seaside. as well as the parallel structure happen to.The subjunctive can be either synthetic (using old inflectional forms) or analytic / periphrastic (employing modal verbs. The same context mentioned above allows the use of if it were not for (for present reference). makes the possibility of an event seem unlikely: . American English tends to use this type of subjunctive in contexts such as "It's important that you go there. If it hadn't been for Jim. which are followed by the indicative: I'll lend you the money provided you don't tell my mother. *I'll give you a call unless I come back in time. will." SYNTHETIC SUBJUNCTIVE .are used in the following contexts: 1) after if: He wouldn't accept your apologies if he knew about your lies. we can replace if with provided.second form of the verb for the present subjunctive (NB.
will you inform me? Will after if introduces the idea of your willingness to do what is suggested. . 5) after it's (high) time we employ either the long infinitive or a For + Accusative + Infinitive construction to suggest that the right moment to do something has come. You wouldn't have found her even if you had hired a private detective.) Had and were are in fact the auxiliaries most commonly involved in such emphatic structures. would in similar contexts is more tentative. however with a difference in meaning. (factual) I wouldn't like him even if he tried to be nice to me. Literary English also allows inversion of the subject and the auxiliary verb instead of an if clause (Had I arrived earlier instead of If I had arrived earlier. I wouldn't have tried to talk her out of selling the car! 3) after even if / even though: They would reject her proposal even if she followed their instructions. (hypothetical) 4) after as if / as though to express an unreal comparison: He is looking at me as if I were his long-lost brother. etc. I would be very grateful. the simple present) in the subordinate and a future form in the main clause (see present tense simple with future value). we use a perfect form. NB. If you would fill in these forms now. usually referring to a bad habit: If you will laugh at people all the time. suggesting that the event in the conditional sentence necessarily precedes the event in the main clause: If you have finished your meal. or we use the present form of the subjunctive to imply that we are rather late in doing something: It's time (for us) to pack our luggage and go. It is also possible to employ the indicative after even if/though. When we aim at emphasizing completion after if. I can't help him. will in if sentences can also express obstinate insistence. 2) after if only to add emphasis to a hypothetical situation or to suggest a sense of regret when combined with the past subjunctive. On the other hand. there is a third possibility that uses the indicative (usually. They were acting as if they hadn't recognized him.If you should hear from him/if you happen to hear from him. NB. I will clear the plates. NB. no wonder nobody wants to talk to you. Compare: I still don't like him even if he tried to be nice to me last time I saw him. It's (high) time you informed her of your failure. more polite: If you will join me to that meeting. quite often the second part of the sentence is left out: If only I won the competition! If only she had told me the truth. Were I to return sooner instead of If I were to return sooner. Apart from these two types of conditional tenses that employ subjunctive forms. I could grant you the loan sooner. The negative counterpart of will indicates one's refusal to do something: If he won't listen to me.
SUBJECT AND OBJECT CLAUSES 1) after exercitive verbs: ask. beg. THE ANALYTIC SUBJUNCTIVE This type of subjunctive appears in complement THAT-clauses of various kinds. I desire that he should be granted the scholarship. a resolution. He would rather his daughter hadn't behaved like a fool. etc. I wish you would hurry up. instruct. prohibit. Function of the verb / adjective contained in the main clause or the noun phrase that functions as the antecedent of the relative clause which contains the subjunctive.6) after wish I wish he came back sooner. would you still have attempted to save the kid? Imagine we'd never spent this time together! 9) after in case. in object clauses: He suggested that we should take the path to the left. advise. wish. suggesting theoretical or potential states or events. 8) after supposing / suppose or imagine: Suppose you inherited a huge fortune. we use either the indicative or the analytic subjunctive (to suggest greater improbability): I'll make a cake in case Father Ted drops by in the afternoon. 7) after would rather when the speaker's preference involves another person's performance of an action: I would rather they invited me to the theater. I'll save a seat for you in case you should decide to come. recommend. 2) after boulomaic verbs: want. I wish they hadn't left for Rome. an intention. It is my desire that she should be invited to our reception. how would you spend it? Supposing they hadn't arrived in time. suggest etc. choose in object clauses: . propose. Notice that a construction with would after wish is possible when the speaker intends to express an annoying habit. order. God forbid that your husband should find out you've been cheating on him! The king ordered that his kingdom should be divided among his sons. command. an order. I demand that they should be treated with more respect. etc. which introduces a contingency or possibility against which a precaution is needed in advance. such sentences often express either a command. or a wish. to invite someone's cooperation or to indicate that either people or events frustrate his desires: I wish you would stop interrupting me. urge. desire. a suggestion. a piece of advice. It is desirable that he could obtain the loan to pay for his studies. I wish it would stop raining. hope.
insist.non-factive intransitive adjectives (in subject clauses): be good / right / best / important / essential / natural / (un)likely / necessary etc. However little you may love her. It is very unlikely that he should have already received news from her. 5) after emotive verbs and adjectives: . It amazes me that you could give up on us so easily. prefer. she is kind of heart. - factive transitive verbs (in subject and object clauses): amaze. I don't exactly understand it.: It is important that you should understand the underlying meaning of his words. He had sat between the twins so that he could court them. arrange. regret etc. 4) in assertive sentences after doubt. but I can imagine it. convince. inform. alarm. surprise. He regretted that the little girl should be ill. I called in the hope that I might find you. but I know that she is shamming. . bother. complain in object clauses: And that you should deceive us. point out. astonish. think. - non-factive transitive verbs and adjectives (in object clauses): intend. I insist that the meeting should be over by ten. I am most anxious that she should get the present I bought for her. I desire that you should comply with my request. persuade etc. remark. We evacuated the building lest the walls should collapse. fancy. ADVERBIAL CLAUSES 1) OF PURPOSE: Let the dog loose so that he can have a run. I don't think you will abandon her.I wish you should be here. I didn't choose that they should shun her. in object clauses: He told them that I should be more careful with the kids. say. matter. - factive intransitive adjectives: be odd / tragic / amazing / surprising: It is amazing that they should survive after all this time. It is odd that you should have agreed to such a proposal. 2) CONCESSIVE: Foolish though she may be. We dared not speak for fear the enemy might hear us. be anxious / eager: I prefer that they should call before paying me a visit.: It bothers me that he should be so obtuse. It doesn't matter that Max should have bought a Cadillac. well. I doubt that I should succeed. imagine. 3) after verbs of linguistic communication: tell. hate. She convinced me that I should apply for a grant.
.Whatever sins he may have. I could help you if you would agree to follow my advice. we would immediately evacuate the village. he can still be saved. 3) OF CONDITION: Should the dam explode. 4) OF RESULT: We should proceed in such a manner that the public may indorse our cause. She is so ill that she should be given an extra dose immediately.