You are on page 1of 2

F-003 Issue 0 Rev 0 Jan 06 2003

Maritime Academy of Asia and the Pacific Kamaya Point

DEPARTMENT OF SHIPBOARD TRAINING


Associated Marine Officers and Seamen's Union of the Philippines - PTGWO - ITF Kamaya Pt., Brgy. Alas-asin, Mariveles, Bataan

SHIPBOARD TRAINING EVALUATION FORM


(for Midshipmen/women)

Name Rank Company Vessel

Period
Embarkation date Disembarkation date

Vessel type

P e r f o r m a n c e A s s e s s m e n t (Check the appropriate box) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. The extent of the Training Record Book for the length of the shipboard training The work tasks and duties The project work The practical training onboard including the facilities The interest and engagement in your training from the ships officers The academic training onboard (if applicable) The academic instructors (if applicable) The tactical officers (if applicable) Competencies achieved at Operational Level for: Deck cadet o o o o o Navigation Cadets Steering Skills Cargo handling and stowage Controlling the operation of the ship and care for persons on board Radio Communication

Engine cadet o o o o 10. Marine engineering Electrical, electronic and control engineering Maintenance and repair Controlling the operation of the ship and care for persons on board

Overall competence while on board

Comments and suggestions:

___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________

Signature

Date

GUIDELINES Performance Assessment Criteria


1. UNACCEPTABLE should only be used when the performance is very poor that continuous use should be critically evaluated. 2. UNSATISFACTORY should only be used for poor performance where there is no sign of need or progress for another use. Corrective actions should be taken to improve the performance. 3. SATISFACTORY should be used for average performance, which would be considered sufficient for the present condition. 4. VERY SATISFACTORY should be used for a performance with certain advantages, initiative and potential. 5. EXCELLENT should be used in exceptional cases. It should not be used excessively.