IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION


INNOVATIVE DISPLAY
TECHNOLOGIES LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

DELL INC.,

Defendant.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§




C.A. No. ____

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
Plaintiff Innovative Display Technologies LLC, by and through its undersigned counsel,
files this Complaint against Defendant Dell Inc. (“Dell”).
THE PARTIES
1. Innovative Display Technologies LLC is a Texas limited liability company with its
principal place of business located at 2400 Dallas Parkway, Suite 200, Plano, TX 75093.
2. Upon information and belief, Dell is a Delaware corporation that claims as its
principal place of business, One Dell Way, Round Rock, TX 78682. Dell also has offices at 2300
West Plano Parkway, Plano, TX 75075. Upon information and belief, Dell has conducted and
regularly conducts business within this District, has purposefully availed itself of the privileges of
conducting business in this District, and has sought protection and benefit from the laws of the
State of Texas.

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT PAGE 1
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 1 of 25 PageID #: 1
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
3. This action arises under the Patent Laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. § 1, et seq.,
including 35 U.S.C. §§ 271, 281, 283, 284, and 285. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction
over this case for patent infringement under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a).
4. As further detailed herein, this Court has personal jurisdiction over Dell. Dell is
amenable to service of summons for this action. Furthermore, personal jurisdiction over Dell in
this action comports with due process. Dell maintains an office in this District at 2300 West Plano
Parkway, Plano, TX 75075 and its headquarters at One Dell Way, Round Rock, TX 78682. Dell
has conducted and regularly conducts business within the United States and this District. Dell has
purposefully availed itself of the privileges of conducting business in the United States, and more
specifically in Texas and this District. Dell has sought protection and benefit from the laws of the
State of Texas by maintaining corporate headquarters in Texas and an office in this District and by
placing infringing products into the stream of commerce through an established distribution
channel with the awareness and/or intent that they will be purchased by consumers in this District.
5. Dell – directly or through intermediaries (including distributors, retailers, and
others), subsidiaries, alter egos, and/or agents – ships, distributes, offers for sale, and/or sells its
products in the United States and this District. Dell has purposefully and voluntarily placed one or
more of its infringing products, as described below, into the stream of commerce with the
awareness and/or intent that they will be purchased by consumers in this District. Defendant
knowingly and purposefully ships infringing products into this District through an established
distribution channel. These infringing products have been and continue to be purchased by
consumers in this District. Upon information and belief, through those activities, Dell has
committed the tort of patent infringement in this District and/or has induced others to commit

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT PAGE 2
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 2 of 25 PageID #: 2
patent infringement in this District. Plaintiff’s cause of action for patent infringement arises
directly from Dell’s activities in this District.
6. Venue is proper in this Court according to the venue provisions set forth by 28
U.S.C. §§ 1391(b)-(d) and 1400(b). Dell is subject to personal jurisdiction in this District, and
therefore is deemed to reside in this District for purposes of venue. Upon information and belief,
Dell has committed acts within this judicial District giving rise to this action and does business in
this District, including but not limited to making sales in this District, providing service and
support to their respective customers in this District, and/or operating an interactive website,
available to persons in this District that advertises, markets, and/or offers for sale infringing
products.
BACKGROUND
A. The Patents-In-Suit.
7. U.S. Patent No. 6,755,547 titled “Light Emitting Panel Assemblies” (“the ’547
patent”) was duly and legally issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on J une 29, 2004,
after full and fair examination. J effery R. Parker is the sole inventor listed on the ’547 patent. The
’547 patent has been assigned to Plaintiff, and Plaintiff holds all rights, title, and interest in the
’547 patent, including the right to collect and receive damages for past, present and future
infringements. A true and correct copy of the ’547 patent is attached as Exhibit A and made a part
hereof.
8. U.S. Patent No. 7,300,194 titled “Light Emitting Panel Assemblies” (“the ’194
patent”) was duly and legally issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on November 27,
2007, after full and fair examination. J effery R. Parker is the sole inventor listed on the ’194 patent.
The ’194 patent has been assigned to Plaintiff, and Plaintiff holds all rights, title, and interest in
the ’194 patent, including the right to collect and receive damages for past, present and future

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT PAGE 3
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 3 of 25 PageID #: 3
infringements. A true and correct copy of the ’194 patent is attached as Exhibit B and made a part
hereof.
9. U.S. Patent No. 7,384,177 titled “Light Emitting Panel Assemblies” (“the ’177
patent”) was duly and legally issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on J une 10, 2008,
after full and fair examination. J effery R. Parker is the sole inventor listed on the ’177 patent. The
’177 patent has been assigned to Plaintiff, and Plaintiff holds all rights, title, and interest in the
’177 patent, including the right to collect and receive damages for past, present and future
infringements. A true and correct copy of the ’177 patent is attached as Exhibit C and made a part
hereof.
10. U.S. Patent No. 7,404,660 titled “Light Emitting Panel Assemblies” (“the ’660
patent”) was duly and legally issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on J uly 29, 2008,
after full and fair examination. J effery R. Parker is the sole inventor listed on the ’660 patent. The
’660 patent has been assigned to Plaintiff, and Plaintiff holds all rights, title, and interest in the
’660 patent, including the right to collect and receive damages for past, present and future
infringements. A true and correct copy of the ’660 patent is attached as Exhibit D and made a part
hereof.
11. U.S. Patent No. 7,434,974 titled “Light Emitting Panel Assemblies” (“the ’974
patent”) was duly and legally issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on October 14, 2008,
after full and fair examination. J effery R. Parker is the sole inventor listed on the ’974 patent. The
’974 patent has been assigned to Plaintiff, and Plaintiff holds all rights, title, and interest in the
’974 patent, including the right to collect and receive damages for past, present and future
infringements. A true and correct copy of the ’974 patent is attached as Exhibit E and made a part
hereof.

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT PAGE 4
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 4 of 25 PageID #: 4
12. U.S. Patent No. 7,537,370 titled “Light Emitting Panel Assemblies” (“the ’370
patent”) was duly and legally issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on May 26, 2009,
after full and fair examination. J effery R. Parker is the sole inventor listed on the ’370 patent. The
’370 patent has been assigned to Plaintiff, and Plaintiff holds all rights, title, and interest in the
’370 patent, including the right to collect and receive damages for past, present and future
infringements. A true and correct copy of the ’370 patent is attached as Exhibit F and made a part
hereof.
13. U.S. Patent No. 8,215,816 titled “Light Emitting Panel Assemblies” (“the ’816
patent”) was duly and legally issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on J uly 10, 2012,
after full and fair examination. J effery R. Parker is the sole inventor listed on the ’816 patent. The
’816 patent has been assigned to Plaintiff, and Plaintiff holds all rights, title, and interest in the
’816 patent, including the right to collect and receive damages for past, present and future
infringements. A true and correct copy of the ’816 patent is attached as Exhibit G and made a part
hereof.
14. J effery R. Parker is an inventor of the ’547 patent, the ’194 patent, the ’177 patent,
the ’660 patent, the ’974 patent, the ’370 patent, and the ’816 patent (collectively, the “patents-in-
suit”). In total, he is a named inventor on over eighty-five (85) U.S. patents.
B. Dell’s Infringing Conduct.
15. Upon information and belief, Dell makes, uses, offers to sell, and/or sells within,
and/or imports into the United States display products that incorporate the fundamental
technologies covered by the patents-in-suit. Upon information and belief, the infringing display
products include, but are not limited to, laptops, desktops, monitors, tablets, and printers (e.g., the
S2340M monitor and the Inspiron i15RV-6190 laptop).

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT PAGE 5
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 5 of 25 PageID #: 5
16. By incorporating the fundamental inventions covered by the patents-in-suit, Dell
can make improved products, including but not limited to, longer displays, thinner displays, and/or
displays with a higher light output, a more uniform light output, and/or a lower power requirement.
17. Upon information and belief, third-party distributors purchase and have purchased
Dell’s infringing display products for sale or importation into the United States, including this
District. Upon information and belief, third-party consumers use and have used Dell’s infringing
display products in the United States, including this District.
18. Upon information and belief, Dell has purchased infringing display products that
are made, used, offered for sale, sold within, and/or imported into the United States, including this
District by third party manufacturers, distributors, and/or importers.
COUNT I
Patent Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,755,547
19. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges each and every allegation of paragraphs 1-18 as
though fully set forth herein.
20. The ’547 patent is valid and enforceable.
21. Dell has never been licensed, either expressly or impliedly, under the ’547 patent.
22. Upon information and belief, to the extent any marking or notice was required by
35 U.S.C. § 287, Plaintiff has complied with the requirements of that statute by providing actual
or constructive notice to Dell of its alleged infringement. Upon information and belief, Plaintiff
surmises that any express licensees of the ’547 patent have complied with the marking
requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 287 by placing a notice of the ’547 patent on all goods made, offered
for sale, sold within, and/or imported into the United States that embody one or more claims of
that patent.

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT PAGE 6
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 6 of 25 PageID #: 6
23. Upon information and belief, Dell has been and is directly infringing under 35
U.S.C. § 271(a), either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, and/or indirectly infringing,
by way of inducement with specific intent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), the ’547 patent by making,
using, offering to sell, and/or selling to third-party manufacturers, distributors, and/or consumers
(directly or through intermediaries and/or subsidiaries) in this District and elsewhere within the
United States and/or importing into the United States, without authority, display products that
include all of the limitations of one or more claims of the ’547 patent, including but not limited to,
laptops, desktops, monitors, tablets, and printers (e.g., the S2340M monitor and the Inspiron
i15RV-6190 laptop), their display components, and/or other products made, used, sold, offered for
sale, or imported by Dell that include all of the limitations of one or more claims of the ’547 patent.
24. Upon information and belief, distributors and consumers that purchase Dell’s
products that include all of the limitations of one or more claims of the ’547 patent, including but
not limited to laptops, desktops, monitors, tablets, and printers (e.g., the S2340M monitor and the
Inspiron i15RV-6190 laptop), also directly infringe, either literally or under the doctrine of
equivalents, under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), the ’547 patent by using, offering to sell, and/or selling
infringing display products in this District and elsewhere in the United States.
25. Upon information and belief, the third-party manufacturers, distributors, and
importers that sell display products to Dell that include all of the limitations of one or more claims
of the ’547 patent, also directly infringe, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, under
35 U.S.C. § 271(a), the ’547 patent by making, offering to sell, and/or selling infringing products
in this District and elsewhere within the United States and/or importing infringing products into
the United States.

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT PAGE 7
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 7 of 25 PageID #: 7
26. Upon information and belief, Dell had knowledge of the ’547 patent and its
infringing conduct at least since filing of this action when it was formally placed on notice of its
infringement.
27. Upon information and belief, since at least the above-mentioned date when Plaintiff
formally placed Dell on notice of its infringement, Dell has actively induced, under U.S.C. §
271(b), third-party manufacturers, distributors, importers and/or consumers to directly infringe one
or more claims of the ’547 patent. Since at least the notice provided on the above-mentioned date,
Dell does so with knowledge, or with willful blindness of the fact, that the induced acts constitute
infringement of the ’547 patent. Upon information and belief, Dell intends to cause infringement
by these third-party manufacturers, distributors, importers, and/or consumers. Dell has taken
affirmative steps to induce their infringement by, inter alia, creating advertisements that promote
the infringing use of display products, creating established distribution channels for these products
into and within the United States, purchasing these products, manufacturing these products in
conformity with U.S. laws and regulations, distributing or making available instructions or
manuals for these products to purchasers and prospective buyers, and/or providing technical
support, replacement parts, or services for these products to these purchasers in the United States.
28. As a direct and proximate result of these acts of patent infringement, Dell has
encroached on the exclusive rights of Plaintiff and its licensees to practice the ’547 patent, for
which Plaintiff is entitled to at least a reasonable royalty.
COUNT II
Patent Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,300,194
29. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges each and every allegation of paragraphs 1-28 as
though fully set forth herein.
30. The ’194 patent is valid and enforceable.

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT PAGE 8
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 8 of 25 PageID #: 8
31. Dell has never been licensed, either expressly or impliedly, under the ’194 patent.
32. Upon information and belief, to the extent any marking or notice was required by
35 U.S.C. § 287, Plaintiff has complied with the requirements of that statute by providing actual
or constructive notice to Dell of its alleged infringement. Upon information and belief, Plaintiff
surmises that any express licensees of the ’194 patent have complied with the marking
requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 287 by placing a notice of the ’194 patent on all goods made, offered
for sale, sold within, and/or imported into the United States that embody one or more claims of
that patent.
33. Upon information and belief, Dell has been and is directly infringing under 35
U.S.C. § 271(a), either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, and/or indirectly infringing,
by way of inducement with specific intent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), the ’194 patent by making,
using, offering to sell, and/or selling to third-party manufacturers, distributors, and/or consumers
(directly or through intermediaries and/or subsidiaries) in this District and elsewhere within the
United States and/or importing into the United States, without authority, display products that
include all of the limitations of one or more claims of the ’194 patent, including but not limited to,
laptops, desktops, monitors, tablets, and printers (e.g., the S2340M monitor and the Inspiron
i15RV-6190 laptop), their display components, and/or other products made, used, sold, offered for
sale, or imported by Dell that include all of the limitations of one or more claims of the ’194 patent.
34. Upon information and belief, distributors and consumers that purchase Dell’s
products that include all of the limitations of one or more claims of the ’194 patent, including but
not limited to laptops, desktops, monitors, tablets, and printers (e.g., the S2340M monitor and the
Inspiron i15RV-6190 laptop), also directly infringe, either literally or under the doctrine of

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT PAGE 9
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 9 of 25 PageID #: 9
equivalents, under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), the ’194 patent by using, offering to sell, and/or selling
infringing display products in this District and elsewhere in the United States.
35. Upon information and belief, the third-party manufacturers, distributors, and
importers that sell display products to Dell that include all of the limitations of one or more claims
of the ’194 patent, also directly infringe, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, under
35 U.S.C. § 271(a), the ’194 patent by making, offering to sell, and/or selling infringing products
in this District and elsewhere within the United States and/or importing infringing products into
the United States.
36. Upon information and belief, Dell had knowledge of the ’194 patent and its
infringing conduct at least since filing of this action when it was formally placed on notice of its
infringement.
37. Upon information and belief, since at least the above-mentioned date when Plaintiff
formally placed Dell on notice of its infringement, Dell has actively induced, under U.S.C. §
271(b), third-party manufacturers, distributors, importers and/or consumers to directly infringe one
or more claims of the ’194 patent. Since at least the notice provided on the above-mentioned date,
Dell does so with knowledge, or with willful blindness of the fact, that the induced acts constitute
infringement of the ’194 patent. Upon information and belief, Dell intends to cause infringement
by these third-party manufacturers, distributors, importers, and/or consumers. Dell has taken
affirmative steps to induce their infringement by, inter alia, creating advertisements that promote
the infringing use of display products, creating established distribution channels for these products
into and within the United States, purchasing these products, manufacturing these products in
conformity with U.S. laws and regulations, distributing or making available instructions or

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT PAGE 10
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 10 of 25 PageID #: 10
manuals for these products to purchasers and prospective buyers, and/or providing technical
support, replacement parts, or services for these products to these purchasers in the United States.
38. As a direct and proximate result of these acts of patent infringement, Dell has
encroached on the exclusive rights of Plaintiff and its licensees to practice the ’194 patent, for
which Plaintiff is entitled to at least a reasonable royalty.
COUNT III
Patent Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,384,177
39. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges each and every allegation of paragraphs 1-38 as
though fully set forth herein.
40. The ’177 patent is valid and enforceable.
41. Dell has never been licensed, either expressly or impliedly, under the ’177 patent.
42. Upon information and belief, to the extent any marking or notice was required by
35 U.S.C. § 287, Plaintiff has complied with the requirements of that statute by providing actual
or constructive notice to Dell of its alleged infringement. Upon information and belief, Plaintiff
surmises that any express licensees of the ’177 patent have complied with the marking
requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 287 by placing a notice of the ’177 patent on all goods made, offered
for sale, sold within, and/or imported into the United States that embody one or more claims of
that patent.
43. Upon information and belief, Dell has been and is directly infringing under 35
U.S.C. § 271(a), either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, and/or indirectly infringing,
by way of inducement with specific intent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), the ’177 patent by making,
using, offering to sell, and/or selling to third-party manufacturers, distributors, and/or consumers
(directly or through intermediaries and/or subsidiaries) in this District and elsewhere within the
United States and/or importing into the United States, without authority, display products that

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT PAGE 11
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 11 of 25 PageID #: 11
include all of the limitations of one or more claims of the ’177 patent, including but not limited to,
laptops, desktops, monitors, tablets, and printers (e.g., the S2340M monitor and the Inspiron
i15RV-6190 laptop), their display components, and/or other products made, used, sold, offered for
sale, or imported by Dell that include all of the limitations of one or more claims of the ’177 patent.
44. Upon information and belief, distributors and consumers that purchase Dell’s
products that include all of the limitations of one or more claims of the ’177 patent, including but
not limited to laptops, desktops, monitors, tablets, and printers (e.g., the S2340M monitor and the
Inspiron i15RV-6190 laptop), also directly infringe, either literally or under the doctrine of
equivalents, under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), the ’177 patent by using, offering to sell, and/or selling
infringing display products in this District and elsewhere in the United States.
45. Upon information and belief, the third-party manufacturers, distributors, and
importers that sell display products to Dell that include all of the limitations of one or more claims
of the ’177 patent, also directly infringe, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, under
35 U.S.C. § 271(a), the ’177 patent by making, offering to sell, and/or selling infringing products
in this District and elsewhere within the United States and/or importing infringing products into
the United States.
46. Upon information and belief, Dell had knowledge of the ’177 patent and its
infringing conduct at least since filing of this action when it was formally placed on notice of its
infringement.
47. Upon information and belief, since at least the above-mentioned date when Plaintiff
formally placed Dell on notice of its infringement, Dell has actively induced, under U.S.C. §
271(b), third-party manufacturers, distributors, importers and/or consumers to directly infringe one
or more claims of the ’177 patent. Since at least the notice provided on the above-mentioned date,

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT PAGE 12
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 12 of 25 PageID #: 12
Dell does so with knowledge, or with willful blindness of the fact, that the induced acts constitute
infringement of the ’177 patent. Upon information and belief, Dell intends to cause infringement
by these third-party manufacturers, distributors, importers, and/or consumers. Dell has taken
affirmative steps to induce their infringement by, inter alia, creating advertisements that promote
the infringing use of display products, creating established distribution channels for these products
into and within the United States, purchasing these products, manufacturing these products in
conformity with U.S. laws and regulations, distributing or making available instructions or
manuals for these products to purchasers and prospective buyers, and/or providing technical
support, replacement parts, or services for these products to these purchasers in the United States.
48. As a direct and proximate result of these acts of patent infringement, Dell has
encroached on the exclusive rights of Plaintiff and its licensees to practice the ’177 patent, for
which Plaintiff is entitled to at least a reasonable royalty.
COUNT IV
Patent Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,404,660
49. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges each and every allegation of paragraphs 1-48 as
though fully set forth herein.
50. The ’660 patent is valid and enforceable.
51. Dell has never been licensed, either expressly or impliedly, under the ’660 patent.
52. Upon information and belief, to the extent any marking or notice was required by
35 U.S.C. § 287, Plaintiff has complied with the requirements of that statute by providing actual
or constructive notice to Dell of its alleged infringement. Upon information and belief, Plaintiff
surmises that any express licensees of the ’660 patent have complied with the marking
requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 287 by placing a notice of the ’660 patent on all goods made, offered

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT PAGE 13
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 13 of 25 PageID #: 13
for sale, sold within, and/or imported into the United States that embody one or more claims of
that patent.
53. Upon information and belief, Dell has been and is directly infringing under 35
U.S.C. § 271(a), either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, and/or indirectly infringing,
by way of inducement with specific intent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), the ’660 patent by making,
using, offering to sell, and/or selling to third-party manufacturers, distributors, and/or consumers
(directly or through intermediaries and/or subsidiaries) in this District and elsewhere within the
United States and/or importing into the United States, without authority, display products that
include all of the limitations of one or more claims of the ’660 patent, including but not limited to,
laptops, desktops, monitors, tablets, and printers (e.g., the S2340M monitor and the Inspiron
i15RV-6190 laptop), their display components, and/or other products made, used, sold, offered for
sale, or imported by Dell that include all of the limitations of one or more claims of the ’660 patent.
54. Upon information and belief, distributors and consumers that purchase Dell’s
products that include all of the limitations of one or more claims of the ‘660 patent, including but
not limited to laptops, desktops, monitors, tablets, and printers (e.g., the S2340M monitor and the
Inspiron i15RV-6190 laptop), also directly infringe, either literally or under the doctrine of
equivalents, under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), the ’660 patent by using, offering to sell, and/or selling
infringing display products in this District and elsewhere in the United States.
55. Upon information and belief, the third-party manufacturers, distributors, and
importers that sell display products to Dell that include all of the limitations of one or more claims
of the ’660 patent, also directly infringe, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, under
35 U.S.C. § 271(a), the ’660 patent by making, offering to sell, and/or selling infringing products

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT PAGE 14
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 14 of 25 PageID #: 14
in this District and elsewhere within the United States and/or importing infringing products into
the United States.
56. Upon information and belief, Dell had knowledge of the ’660 patent and its
infringing conduct at least since filing of this action when it was formally placed on notice of its
infringement.
57. Upon information and belief, since at least the above-mentioned date when Plaintiff
formally placed Dell on notice of its infringement, Dell has actively induced, under U.S.C. §
271(b), third-party manufacturers, distributors, importers and/or consumers to directly infringe one
or more claims of the ’660 patent. Since at least the notice provided on the above-mentioned date,
Dell does so with knowledge, or with willful blindness of the fact, that the induced acts constitute
infringement of the ’660 patent. Upon information and belief, Dell intends to cause infringement
by these third-party manufacturers, distributors, importers, and/or consumers. Dell has taken
affirmative steps to induce their infringement by, inter alia, creating advertisements that promote
the infringing use of display products, creating established distribution channels for these products
into and within the United States, purchasing these products, manufacturing these products in
conformity with U.S. laws and regulations, distributing or making available instructions or
manuals for these products to purchasers and prospective buyers, and/or providing technical
support, replacement parts, or services for these products to these purchasers in the United States.
58. As a direct and proximate result of these acts of patent infringement, Dell has
encroached on the exclusive rights of Plaintiff and its licensees to practice the ’660 patent, for
which Plaintiff is entitled to at least a reasonable royalty.



PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT PAGE 15
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 15 of 25 PageID #: 15
COUNT V
Patent Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,434,974
59. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges each and every allegation of paragraphs 1-58 as
though fully set forth herein.
60. The ’974 patent is valid and enforceable.
61. Dell has never been licensed, either expressly or impliedly, under the ’974 patent.
62. Upon information and belief, to the extent any marking or notice was required by
35 U.S.C. § 287, Plaintiff has complied with the requirements of that statute by providing actual
or constructive notice to Dell of its alleged infringement. Upon information and belief, Plaintiff
surmises that any express licensees of the ’974 patent have complied with the marking
requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 287 by placing a notice of the ’974 patent on all goods made, offered
for sale, sold within, and/or imported into the United States that embody one or more claims of
that patent.
63. Upon information and belief, Dell has been and is directly infringing under 35
U.S.C. § 271(a), either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, and/or indirectly infringing,
by way of inducement with specific intent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), the ’974 patent by making,
using, offering to sell, and/or selling to third-party manufacturers, distributors, and/or consumers
(directly or through intermediaries and/or subsidiaries) in this District and elsewhere within the
United States and/or importing into the United States, without authority, display products that
include all of the limitations of one or more claims of the ’974 patent, including but not limited to,
laptops, desktops, monitors, tablets, and printers (e.g., the S2340M monitor and the Inspiron
i15RV-6190 laptop), their display components, and/or other products made, used, sold, offered for
sale, or imported by Dell that include all of the limitations of one or more claims of the ’974 patent.

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT PAGE 16
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 16 of 25 PageID #: 16
64. Upon information and belief, distributors and consumers that purchase Dell’s
products that include all of the limitations of one or more claims of the ’974 patent, including but
not limited to laptops, desktops, monitors, tablets, and printers (e.g., the S2340M monitor and the
Inspiron i15RV-6190 laptop), also directly infringe, either literally or under the doctrine of
equivalents, under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), the ’974 patent by using, offering to sell, and/or selling
infringing display products in this District and elsewhere in the United States.
65. Upon information and belief, the third-party manufacturers, distributors, and
importers that sell display products to Dell that include all of the limitations of one or more claims
of the ’974 patent, also directly infringe, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, under
35 U.S.C. § 271(a), the ’974 patent by making, offering to sell, and/or selling infringing products
in this District and elsewhere within the United States and/or importing infringing products into
the United States.
66. Upon information and belief, Dell had knowledge of the ’974 patent and its
infringing conduct at least since filing of this action when it was formally placed on notice of its
infringement.
67. Upon information and belief, since at least the above-mentioned date when Plaintiff
formally placed Dell on notice of its infringement, Dell has actively induced, under U.S.C. §
271(b), third-party manufacturers, distributors, importers and/or consumers to directly infringe one
or more claims of the ’974 patent. Since at least the notice provided on the above-mentioned date,
Dell does so with knowledge, or with willful blindness of the fact, that the induced acts constitute
infringement of the ’974 patent. Upon information and belief, Dell intends to cause infringement
by these third-party manufacturers, distributors, importers, and/or consumers. Dell has taken
affirmative steps to induce their infringement by, inter alia, creating advertisements that promote

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT PAGE 17
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 17 of 25 PageID #: 17
the infringing use of display products, creating established distribution channels for these products
into and within the United States, purchasing these products, manufacturing these products in
conformity with U.S. laws and regulations, distributing or making available instructions or
manuals for these products to purchasers and prospective buyers, and/or providing technical
support, replacement parts, or services for these products to these purchasers in the United States.
68. As a direct and proximate result of these acts of patent infringement, Dell has
encroached on the exclusive rights of Plaintiff and its licensees to practice the ’974 patent, for
which Plaintiff is entitled to at least a reasonable royalty.
COUNT VI
Patent Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,537,370
69. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges each and every allegation of paragraphs 1-68 as
though fully set forth herein.
70. The ’370 patent is valid and enforceable.
71. Dell has never been licensed, either expressly or impliedly, under the ’370 patent.
72. Upon information and belief, to the extent any marking or notice was required by
35 U.S.C. § 287, Plaintiff has complied with the requirements of that statute by providing actual
or constructive notice to Dell of its alleged infringement. Upon information and belief, Plaintiff
surmises that any express licensees of the ’370 patent have complied with the marking
requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 287 by placing a notice of the ’370 patent on all goods made, offered
for sale, sold within, and/or imported into the United States that embody one or more claims of
that patent.
73. Upon information and belief, Dell has been and is directly infringing under 35
U.S.C. § 271(a), either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, and/or indirectly infringing,

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT PAGE 18
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 18 of 25 PageID #: 18
by way of inducement with specific intent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), the ’370 patent by making,
using, offering to sell, and/or selling to third-party manufacturers, distributors, and/or consumers
(directly or through intermediaries and/or subsidiaries) in this District and elsewhere within the
United States and/or importing into the United States, without authority, display products that
include all of the limitations of one or more claims of the ’370 patent, including but not limited to,
laptops, desktops, monitors, tablets, and printers (e.g., the S2340M monitor and the Inspiron
i15RV-6190 laptop), their display components, and/or other products made, used, sold, offered for
sale, or imported by Dell that include all of the limitations of one or more claims of the ’370 patent.
74. Upon information and belief, distributors and consumers that purchase Dell’s
products that include all of the limitations of one or more claims of the ’370 patent, including but
not limited to laptops, desktops, monitors, tablets, and printers (e.g., the S2340M monitor and the
Inspiron i15RV-6190 laptop), also directly infringe, either literally or under the doctrine of
equivalents, under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), the ’370 patent by using, offering to sell, and/or selling
infringing display products in this District and elsewhere in the United States.
75. Upon information and belief, the third-party manufacturers, distributors, and
importers that sell display products to Dell that include all of the limitations of one or more claims
of the ’370 patent, also directly infringe, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, under
35 U.S.C. § 271(a), the ’370 patent by making, offering to sell, and/or selling infringing products
in this District and elsewhere within the United States and/or importing infringing products into
the United States.
76. Upon information and belief, Dell had knowledge of the ’370 patent and its
infringing conduct at least since filing of this action when it was formally placed on notice of its
infringement.

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT PAGE 19
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 19 of 25 PageID #: 19
77. Upon information and belief, since at least the above-mentioned date when Plaintiff
formally placed Dell on notice of its infringement, Dell has actively induced, under U.S.C. §
271(b), third-party manufacturers, distributors, importers and/or consumers to directly infringe one
or more claims of the ’370 patent. Since at least the notice provided on the above-mentioned date,
Dell does so with knowledge, or with willful blindness of the fact, that the induced acts constitute
infringement of the ’370 patent. Upon information and belief, Dell intends to cause infringement
by these third-party manufacturers, distributors, importers, and/or consumers. Dell has taken
affirmative steps to induce their infringement by, inter alia, creating advertisements that promote
the infringing use of display products, creating established distribution channels for these products
into and within the United States, purchasing these products, manufacturing these products in
conformity with U.S. laws and regulations, distributing or making available instructions or
manuals for these products to purchasers and prospective buyers, and/or providing technical
support, replacement parts, or services for these products to these purchasers in the United States.
78. As a direct and proximate result of these acts of patent infringement, Dell has
encroached on the exclusive rights of Plaintiff and its licensees to practice the ’370 patent, for
which Plaintiff is entitled to at least a reasonable royalty.
COUNT VII
Patent Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,215,816
79. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges each and every allegation of paragraphs 1-78 as
though fully set forth herein.
80. The ’816 patent is valid and enforceable.
81. Dell has never been licensed, either expressly or impliedly, under the ’816 patent.

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT PAGE 20
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 20 of 25 PageID #: 20
82. Upon information and belief, to the extent any marking or notice was required by
35 U.S.C. § 287, Plaintiff has complied with the requirements of that statute by providing actual
or constructive notice to Dell of its alleged infringement. Upon information and belief, Plaintiff
surmises that any express licensees of the ’816 patent have complied with the marking
requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 287 by placing a notice of the ’816 patent on all goods made, offered
for sale, sold within, and/or imported into the United States that embody one or more claims of
that patent.
83. Upon information and belief, Dell has been and is directly infringing under 35
U.S.C. § 271(a), either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, and/or indirectly infringing,
by way of inducement with specific intent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), the ’816 patent by making,
using, offering to sell, and/or selling to third-party manufacturers, distributors, and/or consumers
(directly or through intermediaries and/or subsidiaries) in this District and elsewhere within the
United States and/or importing into the United States, without authority, display products that
include all of the limitations of one or more claims of the ’816 patent, including but not limited to,
laptops, desktops, monitors, tablets, and printers (e.g., the S2340M monitor and the Inspiron
i15RV-6190 laptop), their display components, and/or other products made, used, sold, offered for
sale, or imported by Dell that include all of the limitations of one or more claims of the ’816 patent.
84. Upon information and belief, distributors and consumers that purchase Dell’s
products that include all of the limitations of one or more claims of the ’816 patent, including but
not limited to laptops, desktops, monitors, tablets, and printers (e.g., the S2340M monitor and the
Inspiron i15RV-6190 laptop), also directly infringe, either literally or under the doctrine of
equivalents, under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), the ’816 patent by using, offering to sell, and/or selling
infringing display products in this District and elsewhere in the United States.

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT PAGE 21
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 21 of 25 PageID #: 21
85. Upon information and belief, the third-party manufacturers, distributors, and
importers that sell display products to Dell that include all of the limitations of one or more claims
of the ’816 patent, also directly infringe, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, under
35 U.S.C. § 271(a), the ’816 patent by making, offering to sell, and/or selling infringing products
in this District and elsewhere within the United States and/or importing infringing products into
the United States.
86. Upon information and belief, Dell had knowledge of the ’816 patent and its
infringing conduct at least since filing of this action when it was formally placed on notice of its
infringement.
87. Upon information and belief, since at least the above-mentioned date when Plaintiff
formally placed Dell on notice of its infringement, Dell has actively induced, under U.S.C. §
271(b), third-party manufacturers, distributors, importers and/or consumers to directly infringe one
or more claims of the ’816 patent. Since at least the notice provided on the above-mentioned date,
Dell does so with knowledge, or with willful blindness of the fact, that the induced acts constitute
infringement of the ’816 patent. Upon information and belief, Dell intends to cause infringement
by these third-party manufacturers, distributors, importers, and/or consumers. Dell has taken
affirmative steps to induce their infringement by, inter alia, creating advertisements that promote
the infringing use of display products, creating established distribution channels for these products
into and within the United States, purchasing these products, manufacturing these products in
conformity with U.S. laws and regulations, distributing or making available instructions or
manuals for these products to purchasers and prospective buyers, and/or providing technical
support, replacement parts, or services for these products to these purchasers in the United States.

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT PAGE 22
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 22 of 25 PageID #: 22
88. As a direct and proximate result of these acts of patent infringement, Dell has
encroached on the exclusive rights of Plaintiff and its licensees to practice the ’816 patent, for
which Plaintiff is entitled to at least a reasonable royalty.
CONCLUSION
89. Plaintiff is entitled to recover from Dell the damages sustained by Plaintiff as a
result of Dell’s wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial, which, by law, cannot be less
than a reasonable royalty, together with interest and costs as fixed by this Court.
90. Plaintiffs have incurred and will incur attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses in the
prosecution of this action. The circumstances of this dispute create an exceptional case within the
meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 285, and Plaintiff is entitled to recover its reasonable and necessary
attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses.
JURY DEMAND
91. Plaintiff hereby requests a trial by jury pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
92. Plaintiff respectfully request that the Court find in its favor and against Dell, and
that the Court grant Plaintiff the following relief:
A. A judgment that Dell has infringed the patents-in-suit as alleged herein, directly
and/or indirectly by way of inducing infringement of such patents;
B. A judgment for an accounting of all damages sustained by Plaintiff as a result of
the acts of infringement by Dell;
C. A judgment and order requiring Dell to pay Plaintiff damages under 35 U.S.C. §
284 and any royalties determined to be appropriate;

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT PAGE 23
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 23 of 25 PageID #: 23
D. A permanent injunction enjoining Dell and its officers, directors, agents, servants,
employees, affiliates, divisions, branches, subsidiaries, parents and all others acting
in concert or privity with them from direct and/or indirect infringement of the
patents-in-suit pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 283;
E. A judgment and order requiring Dell to pay Plaintiff pre-judgment and post-
judgment interest on the damages awarded;
F. A judgment and order finding this to be an exceptional case and requiring Dell to
pay the costs of this action (including all disbursements) and attorneys’ fees as
provided by 35 U.S.C. § 285; and
G. Such other and further relief as the Court deems just and equitable.



PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT PAGE 24
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 24 of 25 PageID #: 24
Dated: J une 28, 2013 Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Jeffrey R. Bragalone
J effrey R. Bragalone (lead attorney)
Texas Bar No. 02855775
Patrick J . Conroy
Texas Bar No. 24012448
J ustin B. Kimble
Texas Bar No. 24036909
T. William Kennedy, J r.
Texas Bar No. 24055771
Daniel F. Olejko
Pennsylvania Bar No. 205512
Bragalone Conroy PC
2200 Ross Avenue
Suite 4500W
Dallas, TX 75201
Tel: (214) 785-6670
Fax: (214) 785-6680
jbragalone@bcpc-law.com
pconroy@bcpc-law.com
jkimble@bcpc-law.com
bkennedy@bcpc-law.com
dolejko@bcpc-law.com

T. J ohn Ward J r.
Texas Bar No. 00794818
Claire Abernathy Henry
Ward & Smith Law Firm
1127 J udson Road, Suite 220
Longview, TX 75601
Tel: (903) 757-6400
Fax: (903) 757.2323
jw@wsfirm.com
claire@wsfirm.com


Attorneys for Plaintiff
INNOVATIVE DISPLAY
TECHNOLOGIES LLC

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT PAGE 25
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 25 of 25 PageID #: 25
JS 44 (Rev. 12/12)
CIVIL COVER SHEET
The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the inIormation contained herein neither replace nor supplement the Iiling and service oI pleadings or other papers as required by law, except as
provided by local rules oI court. This Iorm, approved by the Judicial ConIerence oI the United States in September 1974, is required Ior the use oI the Clerk oI Court Ior the
purpose oI initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.)
I. (a) PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS
(b) County oI Residence oI First Listed PlaintiII County oI Residence oI First Listed DeIendant
(EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)
NOTE: IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE LOCATION OF
THE TRACT OF LAND INVOLVED.

(c) Attorneys (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number) Attorneys (If Known)
II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an “X” in One Box Only) III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an “X” in One Box for Plaintiff
(For Diversity Cases Only) and One Box for Defendant)
u 1 U.S. Government u 3 Federal Question PTF DEF PTF DEF
PlaintiII (U.S. Government Not a Party) Citizen oI This State u 1 u 1 Incorporated or Principal Place u 4 u 4
oI Business In This State
u 2 U.S. Government u 4 Diversity Citizen oI Another State u 2 u 2 Incorporated and Principal Place u 5 u 5
DeIendant (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III) oI Business In Another State
Citizen or Subject oI a u 3 u 3 Foreign Nation u 6 u 6
Foreign Country
IV. NATURE OF SUIT (Place an “X” in One Box Only)
CONTRACT TORTS FORFEITURE/PENALTY BANKRUPTCY OTHER STATUTES
u 110 Insurance PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY u 625 Drug Related Seizure u 422 Appeal 28 USC 158 u 375 False Claims Act
u 120 Marine u 310 Airplane u 365 Personal Injury - oI Property 21 USC 881 u 423 Withdrawal u 400 State Reapportionment
u 130 Miller Act u 315 Airplane Product Product Liability u 690 Other 28 USC 157 u 410 Antitrust
u 140 Negotiable Instrument Liability u 367 Health Care/ u 430 Banks and Banking
u 150 Recovery oI Overpayment u 320 Assault, Libel & Pharmaceutical PROPERTY RIGHTS u 450 Commerce
& EnIorcement oI Judgment Slander Personal Injury u 820 Copyrights u 460 Deportation
u 151 Medicare Act u 330 Federal Employers` Product Liability u 830 Patent u 470 Racketeer InIluenced and
u 152 Recovery oI DeIaulted Liability u 368 Asbestos Personal u 840 Trademark Corrupt Organizations
Student Loans u 340 Marine Injury Product u 480 Consumer Credit
(Excludes Veterans) u 345 Marine Product Liability LABOR SOCIAL SECURITY u 490 Cable/Sat TV
u 153 Recovery oI Overpayment Liability PERSONAL PROPERTY u 710 Fair Labor Standards u 861 HIA (1395II) u 850 Securities/Commodities/
oI Veteran`s BeneIits u 350 Motor Vehicle u 370 Other Fraud Act u 862 Black Lung (923) Exchange
u 160 Stockholders` Suits u 355 Motor Vehicle u 371 Truth in Lending u 720 Labor/Management u 863 DIWC/DIWW (405(g)) u 890 Other Statutory Actions
u 190 Other Contract Product Liability u 380 Other Personal Relations u 864 SSID Title XVI u 891 Agricultural Acts
u 195 Contract Product Liability u 360 Other Personal Property Damage u 740 Railway Labor Act u 865 RSI (405(g)) u 893 Environmental Matters
u 196 Franchise Injury u 385 Property Damage u 751 Family and Medical u 895 Freedom oI InIormation
u 362 Personal Injury - Product Liability Leave Act Act
Medical Malpractice u 790 Other Labor Litigation u 896 Arbitration
REAL PROPERTY CIVIL RIGHTS PRISONER PETITIONS u 791 Employee Retirement FEDERAL TAX SUITS u 899 Administrative Procedure
u 210 Land Condemnation u 440 Other Civil Rights Habeas Corpus: Income Security Act u 870 Taxes (U.S. PlaintiII Act/Review or Appeal oI
u 220 Foreclosure u 441 Voting u 463 Alien Detainee or DeIendant) Agency Decision
u 230 Rent Lease & Ejectment u 442 Employment u 510 Motions to Vacate u 871 IRSThird Party u 950 Constitutionality oI
u 240 Torts to Land u 443 Housing/ Sentence 26 USC 7609 State Statutes
u 245 Tort Product Liability Accommodations u 530 General
u 290 All Other Real Property u 445 Amer. w/Disabilities - u 535 Death Penalty IMMIGRATION
Employment Other: u 462 Naturalization Application
u 446 Amer. w/Disabilities - u 540 Mandamus & Other u 465 Other Immigration
Other u 550 Civil Rights Actions
u 448 Education u 555 Prison Condition
u 560 Civil Detainee -
Conditions oI
ConIinement
V. ORIGIN (Place an “X” in One Box Only)
u 1 Original
Proceeding
u 2 Removed Irom
State Court
u 3 Remanded Irom
Appellate Court
u 4 Reinstated or
Reopened
u 5 TransIerred Irom
Another District
(specify)
u 6 Multidistrict
Litigation
VI. CAUSE OF ACTION
Cite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are Iiling (Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity):

BrieI description oI cause:
VII. REQUESTED IN
COMPLAINT:
u CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTION
UNDER RULE 23, F.R.Cv.P.
DEMAND $ CHECK YES only iI demanded in complaint:
JURY DEMAND: u Yes u No
VIII. RELATED CASE(S)
IF ANY
(See instructions):
JUDGE DOCKET NUMBER
DATE SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
RECEIPT # AMOUNT APPLYING IFP JUDGE MAG. JUDGE
INNOVATIVE DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Collin
J effrey R. Bragalone, Bragalone Conroy PC
2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 4500W
Dallas, TX 75201 214-785-6670
DELL, INC.
35 U.S.C. § 1, et seq., including 35 U.S.C. §§ 271, 281, 283, 284, and 285
Infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,755,547, 7,300,194, 7,384,177, et al
06/28/2013 /s/ J effrey R. Bragalone
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 26
JS 44 Reverse (Rev. 12/12)
INSTRUCTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS COMPLETING CIVIL COVER SHEET FORM JS 44
Authority For Civil Cover Sheet
The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the inIormation contained herein neither replaces nor supplements the Iilings and service oI pleading or other papers as
required by law, except as provided by local rules oI court. This Iorm, approved by the Judicial ConIerence oI the United States in September 1974, is
required Ior the use oI the Clerk oI Court Ior the purpose oI initiating the civil docket sheet. Consequently, a civil cover sheet is submitted to the Clerk oI
Court Ior each civil complaint Iiled. The attorney Iiling a case should complete the Iorm as Iollows:
I.(a) Plaintiffs-Defendants. Enter names (last, Iirst, middle initial) oI plaintiII and deIendant. II the plaintiII or deIendant is a government agency, use
only the Iull name or standard abbreviations. II the plaintiII or deIendant is an oIIicial within a government agency, identiIy Iirst the agency and
then the oIIicial, giving both name and title.
(b) County of Residence. For each civil case Iiled, except U.S. plaintiII cases, enter the name oI the county where the Iirst listed plaintiII resides at the
time oI Iiling. In U.S. plaintiII cases, enter the name oI the county in which the Iirst listed deIendant resides at the time oI Iiling. (NOTE: In land
condemnation cases, the county oI residence oI the "deIendant" is the location oI the tract oI land involved.)
(c) Attorneys. Enter the Iirm name, address, telephone number, and attorney oI record. II there are several attorneys, list them on an attachment, noting
in this section "(see attachment)".
II. Jurisdiction. The basis oI jurisdiction is set Iorth under Rule 8(a), F.R.Cv.P., which requires that jurisdictions be shown in pleadings. Place an "X"
in one oI the boxes. II there is more than one basis oI jurisdiction, precedence is given in the order shown below.
United States plaintiII. (1) Jurisdiction based on 28 U.S.C. 1345 and 1348. Suits by agencies and oIIicers oI the United States are included here.
United States deIendant. (2) When the plaintiII is suing the United States, its oIIicers or agencies, place an "X" in this box.
Federal question. (3) This reIers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1331, where jurisdiction arises under the Constitution oI the United States, an amendment
to the Constitution, an act oI Congress or a treaty oI the United States. In cases where the U.S. is a party, the U.S. plaintiII or deIendant code takes
precedence, and box 1 or 2 should be marked.
Diversity oI citizenship. (4) This reIers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1332, where parties are citizens oI diIIerent states. When Box 4 is checked, the
citizenship oI the diIIerent parties must be checked. (See Section III below; NOTE: federal question actions take precedence over diversity
cases.)
III. Residence (citizenship) of Principal Parties. This section oI the JS 44 is to be completed iI diversity oI citizenship was indicated above. Mark this
section Ior each principal party.
IV. Nature of Suit. Place an "X" in the appropriate box. II the nature oI suit cannot be determined, be sure the cause oI action, in Section VI below, is
suIIicient to enable the deputy clerk or the statistical clerk(s) in the Administrative OIIice to determine the nature oI suit. II the cause Iits more than
one nature oI suit, select the most deIinitive.
V. Origin. Place an "X" in one oI the six boxes.
Original Proceedings. (1) Cases which originate in the United States district courts.
Removed Irom State Court. (2) Proceedings initiated in state courts may be removed to the district courts under Title 28 U.S.C., Section 1441.
When the petition Ior removal is granted, check this box.
Remanded Irom Appellate Court. (3) Check this box Ior cases remanded to the district court Ior Iurther action. Use the date oI remand as the Iiling
date.
Reinstated or Reopened. (4) Check this box Ior cases reinstated or reopened in the district court. Use the reopening date as the Iiling date.
TransIerred Irom Another District. (5) For cases transIerred under Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a). Do not use this Ior within district transIers or
multidistrict litigation transIers.
Multidistrict Litigation. (6) Check this box when a multidistrict case is transIerred into the district under authority oI Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1407.
When this box is checked, do not check (5) above.
VI. Cause of Action. Report the civil statute directly related to the cause oI action and give a brieI description oI the cause. Do not cite jurisdictional
statutes unless diversity. Example: U.S. Civil Statute: 47 USC 553 BrieI Description: Unauthorized reception oI cable service
VII. Requested in Complaint. Class Action. Place an "X" in this box iI you are Iiling a class action under Rule 23, F.R.Cv.P.
Demand. In this space enter the actual dollar amount being demanded or indicate other demand, such as a preliminary injunction.
Jury Demand. Check the appropriate box to indicate whether or not a jury is being demanded.
VIII. Related Cases. This section oI the JS 44 is used to reIerence related pending cases, iI any. II there are related pending cases, insert the docket
numbers and the corresponding judge names Ior such cases.
Date and Attorney Signature. Date and sign the civil cover sheet.
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 27









EXHIBIT A


Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-2 Filed 06/28/13 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 28
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-2 Filed 06/28/13 Page 2 of 13 PageID #: 29
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-2 Filed 06/28/13 Page 3 of 13 PageID #: 30
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-2 Filed 06/28/13 Page 4 of 13 PageID #: 31
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-2 Filed 06/28/13 Page 5 of 13 PageID #: 32
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-2 Filed 06/28/13 Page 6 of 13 PageID #: 33
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-2 Filed 06/28/13 Page 7 of 13 PageID #: 34
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-2 Filed 06/28/13 Page 8 of 13 PageID #: 35
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-2 Filed 06/28/13 Page 9 of 13 PageID #: 36
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-2 Filed 06/28/13 Page 10 of 13 PageID #: 37
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-2 Filed 06/28/13 Page 11 of 13 PageID #: 38
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-2 Filed 06/28/13 Page 12 of 13 PageID #: 39
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-2 Filed 06/28/13 Page 13 of 13 PageID #: 40









EXHIBIT B


Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-3 Filed 06/28/13 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 41
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-3 Filed 06/28/13 Page 2 of 13 PageID #: 42
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-3 Filed 06/28/13 Page 3 of 13 PageID #: 43
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-3 Filed 06/28/13 Page 4 of 13 PageID #: 44
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-3 Filed 06/28/13 Page 5 of 13 PageID #: 45
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-3 Filed 06/28/13 Page 6 of 13 PageID #: 46
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-3 Filed 06/28/13 Page 7 of 13 PageID #: 47
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-3 Filed 06/28/13 Page 8 of 13 PageID #: 48
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-3 Filed 06/28/13 Page 9 of 13 PageID #: 49
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-3 Filed 06/28/13 Page 10 of 13 PageID #: 50
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-3 Filed 06/28/13 Page 11 of 13 PageID #: 51
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-3 Filed 06/28/13 Page 12 of 13 PageID #: 52
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-3 Filed 06/28/13 Page 13 of 13 PageID #: 53









EXHIBIT C


Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-4 Filed 06/28/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 54
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-4 Filed 06/28/13 Page 2 of 12 PageID #: 55
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-4 Filed 06/28/13 Page 3 of 12 PageID #: 56
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-4 Filed 06/28/13 Page 4 of 12 PageID #: 57
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-4 Filed 06/28/13 Page 5 of 12 PageID #: 58
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-4 Filed 06/28/13 Page 6 of 12 PageID #: 59
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-4 Filed 06/28/13 Page 7 of 12 PageID #: 60
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-4 Filed 06/28/13 Page 8 of 12 PageID #: 61
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-4 Filed 06/28/13 Page 9 of 12 PageID #: 62
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-4 Filed 06/28/13 Page 10 of 12 PageID #: 63
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-4 Filed 06/28/13 Page 11 of 12 PageID #: 64
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-4 Filed 06/28/13 Page 12 of 12 PageID #: 65









EXHIBIT D


Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-5 Filed 06/28/13 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 66
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-5 Filed 06/28/13 Page 2 of 13 PageID #: 67
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-5 Filed 06/28/13 Page 3 of 13 PageID #: 68
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-5 Filed 06/28/13 Page 4 of 13 PageID #: 69
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-5 Filed 06/28/13 Page 5 of 13 PageID #: 70
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-5 Filed 06/28/13 Page 6 of 13 PageID #: 71
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-5 Filed 06/28/13 Page 7 of 13 PageID #: 72
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-5 Filed 06/28/13 Page 8 of 13 PageID #: 73
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-5 Filed 06/28/13 Page 9 of 13 PageID #: 74
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-5 Filed 06/28/13 Page 10 of 13 PageID #: 75
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-5 Filed 06/28/13 Page 11 of 13 PageID #: 76
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-5 Filed 06/28/13 Page 12 of 13 PageID #: 77
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-5 Filed 06/28/13 Page 13 of 13 PageID #: 78









EXHIBIT E


Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-6 Filed 06/28/13 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 79
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-6 Filed 06/28/13 Page 2 of 14 PageID #: 80
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-6 Filed 06/28/13 Page 3 of 14 PageID #: 81
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-6 Filed 06/28/13 Page 4 of 14 PageID #: 82
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-6 Filed 06/28/13 Page 5 of 14 PageID #: 83
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-6 Filed 06/28/13 Page 6 of 14 PageID #: 84
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-6 Filed 06/28/13 Page 7 of 14 PageID #: 85
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-6 Filed 06/28/13 Page 8 of 14 PageID #: 86
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-6 Filed 06/28/13 Page 9 of 14 PageID #: 87
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-6 Filed 06/28/13 Page 10 of 14 PageID #: 88
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-6 Filed 06/28/13 Page 11 of 14 PageID #: 89
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-6 Filed 06/28/13 Page 12 of 14 PageID #: 90
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-6 Filed 06/28/13 Page 13 of 14 PageID #: 91
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-6 Filed 06/28/13 Page 14 of 14 PageID #: 92









EXHIBIT F


Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-7 Filed 06/28/13 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 93
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-7 Filed 06/28/13 Page 2 of 13 PageID #: 94
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-7 Filed 06/28/13 Page 3 of 13 PageID #: 95
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-7 Filed 06/28/13 Page 4 of 13 PageID #: 96
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-7 Filed 06/28/13 Page 5 of 13 PageID #: 97
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-7 Filed 06/28/13 Page 6 of 13 PageID #: 98
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-7 Filed 06/28/13 Page 7 of 13 PageID #: 99
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-7 Filed 06/28/13 Page 8 of 13 PageID #: 100
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-7 Filed 06/28/13 Page 9 of 13 PageID #: 101
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-7 Filed 06/28/13 Page 10 of 13 PageID #: 102
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-7 Filed 06/28/13 Page 11 of 13 PageID #: 103
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-7 Filed 06/28/13 Page 12 of 13 PageID #: 104
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-7 Filed 06/28/13 Page 13 of 13 PageID #: 105









EXHIBIT G


Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-8 Filed 06/28/13 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 106
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-8 Filed 06/28/13 Page 2 of 13 PageID #: 107
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-8 Filed 06/28/13 Page 3 of 13 PageID #: 108
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-8 Filed 06/28/13 Page 4 of 13 PageID #: 109
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-8 Filed 06/28/13 Page 5 of 13 PageID #: 110
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-8 Filed 06/28/13 Page 6 of 13 PageID #: 111
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-8 Filed 06/28/13 Page 7 of 13 PageID #: 112
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-8 Filed 06/28/13 Page 8 of 13 PageID #: 113
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-8 Filed 06/28/13 Page 9 of 13 PageID #: 114
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-8 Filed 06/28/13 Page 10 of 13 PageID #: 115
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-8 Filed 06/28/13 Page 11 of 13 PageID #: 116
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-8 Filed 06/28/13 Page 12 of 13 PageID #: 117
Case 2:13-cv-00523-JRG Document 1-8 Filed 06/28/13 Page 13 of 13 PageID #: 118