71 views

Uploaded by Gerald Maginga

Deflection & Cracking

save

- Help File for Spreader Design
- 150T Bin Design Report
- CHP4.pdf
- Analytical Solution for Fixed-End Beam Subjected to Uniform Load
- 1）notes_22_plate_bendin[1].pdf
- 05-03ChapGere[1]
- The Winkler Model and Its Application to Soil
- Curved Prestressed Beam
- 367079729-PRACTICE-PROBLEMS-IN-TIMBER-DESIGN.pdf
- Mat Chapter24wex
- Vertical Louvers
- Design of Steel Structures.21-30
- Example Feabend
- Individual Report hjbftyfujl
- Chapter 5 98
- e04eng - Uso de Vigas Friendly
- Advanced mechanics of solids
- Mathcad - Aibox_tb
- B.arch. I to X Curriculum and Syllabus
- Reinforced Concrete Beam Design - Deflections
- Glulam curved beam design to EC5
- ICS Syllabus
- CE GATE-2018 Paper 11-FEB-2018 Morning Session
- B.ARCH syllabus
- Http Www.inrisk.ubc.CA Process.php File=STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Kirchhoff Plates
- CFD-CSA-A23.3-04
- Simply Supported and Continuous Bridges
- Examen_2013-03-15
- 5.Winter-13
- dosnvn-140604230333-phpapp02
- AnalysisRCFrames
- Vitunguu
- Tomato Booklet
- Lecture No.5 - Bridge-Loads
- Lecture No.8 - Bridge Foundations
- CI in Tanzania
- Application of Preference Scheme in the Evalauation of Proposals and Bids
- TM 420 Lecture 10 Cost Management
- Procurement of Smaller Works
- Chapter One
- Vitunguu
- WR230 L12 Sedimentation.ppt
- Tanzania_Field Testing Manual (2003).pdf
- TPJ5 of 2017 Final
- Construction Project Delivery
- Pretender Checklist
- Piling Health Hazards
- Truss Method
- 2.0 Cross Section Design
- Cracking
- How Cement Ismade 2008
- Abutment Design
- Transportation Engineering
- Overview of Construction Planning Techniques
- 7.0 Super Elevation Design
- Pre Stress Losses
- Lecture 15 - Earned Value Analysis
- Shear Walls
- Example Mtd Statement
- Design Of Steel Structures

You are on page 1of 27

**DEFLECTION AND CRACKS IN REINFORCED
**

CONCRETE STRUCTURES

11.1 Introduction

To fulfill safety requirements the changes of behaviour of structure must

be analyzed with great care. These changes are often caused by local

reduction of the stiffness of the structure caused by serviceability limit

irregularities in the structure. Deflection and cracking happen to be

critical serviceability limit design considerations for R.C. structures.

Thus the structure should not become unfit for use due to such limits

as excessive deflection, cracking or vibration.

The deflection provisions are set out in:

BS 8110: Part 2 Section 3.2.1.

The crack provisions are set out in:

BS 8110: Part 1: Sections 2.2.3; 2.2.3.4.1; 3.12.11.2

BS 8110: Part 2: Sections 3.8.1; Section 8

11.2 Deflection in Reinforced Concrete Structures

11.2.1 Deflection limits

Deflection in an element is noticeable if it δ

250

L

>

; where L is the length of

the element. However to avoid damage to non-structural elements such

as partitions and finishes the deflection limits are set out as:

(a)

mm or

L

20

500

; whichever is lesser for brittle finishes

(b)

mm or

L

20

350

; whichever is lesser for non-brittle finishes

11.2.2 Deflection control

BS 8110 stipulates that deflections in r.c. structures will be under control

if the ratios of span of element to effective depth of the element are

limited to the restrictions set out in section 3.4.6 of Part 1. Under normal

circumstances if the above restrictions are adhered to then the design will

result into a structure whose deflections will be within the allowable limits.

Otherwise deflections will have to be computed as outlined below and

then compared with the serviceability requirements given in section 3 of

BS 8110: Part 2 of 1985.

Example

1

A simply supported rectangular reinforced concrete beam is as shown in

FIGURE 1.1. Given the following design data, determine what depth, h, of

the beam will ensure that deflection criterion is not violated? Take fire

resistance to be 1.5 hours.

i) Nominal cover to main reinforcement = 20 mm

ii) Dead load on beam due to finishes = 0.75 kN/m

2

iii) Imposed load on beam = 3 kN/m

iv) Unit weight of concrete = 24 kN/m

3

v) Concrete strength, f

cu

= 25 N/mm

2

vi) Reinforcing bar strength f

y

, = 460 N/mm

2

(a) Longitudinal section of the beam

(b) Transverse section XX of the beam

2

h

250 mm

5000

X

X

b

h

FIGURE 1.1

Solution

From the basic

depth

span

ratio given in Table 3.10 of BS 8110: Part 1: 1985,

and assuming a modification factor of 1.2

mm

x

d

x

d

Span

3 . 208

2 . 1 20

5000

2 . 1 20

min

min

·

·

·

Thus initial depth of the beam

c d h + + ·

2

min

φ

Assume that 16 mm φ bar is used, cover of 20 mm for 1.5 hour fire

resistance, then we have

mm

h

250

3 . 236

20

2

16

3 . 208

≈

·

+ + ·

For fire resistance of 1.5 hour the minimum breadth of the beam from

Figure 3.2 of BS 8110: Part 1:1985 is 200 mm

Thus use a beam of

mm b mm h 200 250 · ·

Then effective depth is

mm d 222 20

2

16

250 · − − ·

Loading computation

Dead load Self weight =24 x 0.25 x 0.2 kN/m

=1.2 kN/m

Finishes =0.75x[0.25+0.2]x2

=0.675 kN/m

Total D.L., g

k

=1.2+0.675 = 1.875 kN/m

Imposed Load q

k

= 3 kN/m

Total ultimate Load n = 1.4g

k

+ 1.6q

k

= 1.4x1.875 + 1.6x3

=7.425 kN/m

Applied ultimate bending moment for simply supported condition, M

kNm

x

nl

M

2 . 23

8

5 425 . 7

8

2

2

·

·

·

Design ultimate bending moment of resistance, M

u

kNm

x x x x

d b f M

cu u

44 . 38

10 222 200 25 156 . 0

156 . 0

6 2

2

·

·

·

−

3

Since M

u

> M, provide only tension reinforcement only.

4

Design of tensile reinforcement

K =

cu

f bd

M

2

=

25 222 200

10 2 . 23

2

6

x x

x

= 0.094

Lever arm, Z = d[0.5+ )

9 . 0

25 . 0 (

K

− ]

= 222[0.5+ )

9 . 0

094 . 0

25 . 0 ( −

= 0.881 x 222 < 0.95d

= 195.65 mm

Area of tensile reinforcement

A

s

=

Z f

M

y

87 . 0

=

65 . 195 460 87 . 0

10 2 . 23

6

x x

x

= 296 mm

2

Check adequacy of reinforcement

A

st(min)

=

bh

100

13 . 0

=

100

13 . 0

x 200 x 250

= 65 mm

2

A

st(max)

=

bh

100

4

=

100

4

x 200 x 250

= 2000 mm

2

Thus provide, 3Y12 ≡ 339.3 mm

2

Check deflection

2

bd

M

=

2

6

222 200

10 2 . 23

x

x

= 2.35 MPa

Service stress, f

s

=

b prov s

req s

y

A

A

f

β

1

8

5

) (

) (

Equation 8 (BS8110 Part 1)

=

1

1

3 . 339

296

460

8

5

x x x

= 250.8 MPa

Modification factor, M.F.

M.F. = 0.55 +

) 9 . 0 ( 120

) 477 (

2

bd

M

f

s

+

−

≤ 2.0 Equation 7 (BS8110 Part 1)

= 0.55 +

) 35 . 2 9 . 0 ( 120

) 8 . 250 477 (

+

−

= 0.55 + 0.58

= 1.13 < 2.0

5

Allowable span/d ratio = 20 x 1.13 = 22.6

Actual span/d ratio = 5000/222 = 22.5

The beam depth is satisfactory with respect to deflection. Thus provide a

minimum depth of

mm h 250 ·

for the beam.

11.2.5 Deflection Calculation

The calculation of deflection in reinforced concrete is spelt out in BS 8110:

Part 2 Sections 3.6 and 3.7.

Procedure of calculating deflections in reinforced concrete elements is as

follows:

Step 1: Determine the moment acting on the element

Use elastic analysis using gross concrete section and taking serviceability

limit loads, viz.

k k

Q G 0 . 1 0 . 1 +

with appropriate loading patterns. No

redistribution of moment is allowed.

Step 2: Determine the curvatures of the element

BS 8110: Part 2 Section 3.6 outlines the procedure of determining the

curvature due to the loading. It differentiates the curvature for a cracked

concrete section from that of an uncracked concrete section, then adopts

the one that gives the larger value.

(i) To determine the curvatures of an r.c. element that has

cracked – Method one

Assumptions Refer to section 3.6 page 3/2 of BS 8110: Part 2.

N A

SECTION STRAINS STRESSES FORCES

Figure 1.2: Section properties of a cracked r.c. element (Figure 3.1(a) of

BS 8110: Part 2)

6

f

st

ρ

f

ct

f

cc

d

/

d

/

d

b

h

A

st

A

sc

d-x ε

st

ε

sc

ε

cc

x

f

sc

T

s

T

c

C

s

C

c

NOTE: h is the overall depth of the section

x is the depth from the compression face to the neutral

axis

d Effective depth of the section

f

cc

is the maximum compressive stress in the concrete

f

st

is the tensile stress in the reinforcement

E

s

The modulus of elasticity of the reinforcement

E

c

The short term modulus of elasticity of the concrete

Curvature:

x r

cc

ε

ρ · ·

1

; from strain diagram, Eqn. 7 of BS 8110:

Part 2

Compression strain in concrete:

c

cc

cc

E

f

· ε

; from Hooke’s Law

Compression stress in concrete:

cc c cc

E f ε ·

Tensile strain in steel:

s

st

cc st

E

f

x

x d

·

,

_

¸

¸ −

· ε ε

; from stress diagram.

Tensile stress in concrete:

,

_

¸

¸ −

·

x

x h

f f

cc ct

'

; from stress diagram

Tensile stress in concrete at level of steel:

,

_

¸

¸ −

·

x

x d

f f

cc ct

; Where

ct

f

is

fixed at 1.00 N/mm

2

in short term loading and 0.55 N/mm

2

in long-term

loading.

From the BS 8110 assumptions, curvature at mid span of a beam or for

cantilever at the support section is given by:

( )

s

st

c

cc cc

b

E x d

f

xE

f

x r −

· · · ·

ε

ρ

1

Which is given as equation 7 in the BS 8110.

The Procedure

(a) Construct the strain, stress and force diagram for the section as

shown in Figure 1.2 above. Note that for long-term loads the

effective value of E

c

should be used.

Let α

e

= Modular ratio =

c

s

E

E

(b) Express the reinforcement stresses in terms of concrete stresses

cc

sc

e

cc c

sc s

cc

sc

E

E

f

f

ε

ε

α

ε

ε

· ·

but from the strain diagram

x

d x

cc

sc

/

−

·

ε

ε

thus;

,

_

¸

¸ −

·

x

d x

f f

cc e sc

/

α

Similarly;

,

_

¸

¸ −

·

x

x d

f f

cc e st

α

(c) Compute the internal forces

bx f C

cc c

5 . 0 ·

,

_

¸

¸ −

· ·

x

d x

A f A f C

sc cc e sc sc s

/

α

7

,

_

¸

¸ −

· ·

x

x d

A f A f T

st cc e st st s

α

[ ]

[ ]

,

_

¸

¸

−

−

·

x d

x h

b f T

ct c

2

5 . 0

(d) From the equilibrium of internal forces

0 · − − +

c s s c

T T C C

The respective values in the above equation can be substituted from

equations in step (c) above

(e) Taking moment about the N.A. for the internal forces

( ) ( ) ( ) x h T x d T d x C x C M

c s s c I

− + − + − + ·

3

2

3

2

/

The respective values in the above equation can be substituted from

equations in step (c) above.

(f) Equating the external moment computed in Step 1 and the internal

moment computed in Step 2 (e). That is moment due to internal

forces must balance the moment due to external loads.

Thus there are two polynomial functions in terms of two unknowns,

f

cc

and x, which can be solved by successive trials to obtain the

desired values.

Note that the area of concrete occupied by the reinforcement has

not been deducted in the expression above.

(ii) To calculate the curvatures of an r.c. element that has

cracked – Method two

An alternative equation defining ρ is given by:

; where M is the moment at the section

considered I is the second moment of

area.

The Procedure

(a) Transform the reinforced concrete section into a pure concrete

section as shown in Figure 1.3 below

8

b

I E

M

r

c b

· ·

1

ρ

d

/

α

e

A

sc

R.C. Section Transformed section

Figure 1.3: Transformed r.c. section

(b) Compute the second moment of area of the transformed section

about x-x

( ) ( ) ( )

( ) ( )

2

2

/ 3

2

2

/

2

3

3

1

2 12

1

x d A d x A bx

x d A d x A

x

bx bx I

st e sc e

st e sc e xx

− + − + ·

− + − +

,

_

¸

¸

+ ·

α α

α α

(c) Establish the reduced moment of resistance

Consider the concrete in the tension zone. The moment of

resistance of the concrete in tension is

( ) x h T M

c c

− ·

3

2

. Where T

c

was computed in step 2.

c R

M M M − ·

. Where M was computed in step 1

(d) Compute the curvature

Otherwise calculate;

x c

R c

I E

M

x

·

ε

⇒

x

R

c

I

x M

f ·

c

c

c

E

f

· ε

; where E

c

depends on whether the loads applied are short-

term or long-term.

Then

x r

c

ε

·

1

(iii) To calculate the curvatures of an r.c. element that is un-

cracked

Assumptions See BS 8110: Part 2 section 3.6(b) page 3/3

9

D

cc

α

e

A

st

2(h-x)/3

T

c

x-d

/

d-x

x

f

ct

d

/

d

b

h

A

st

A

sc

x c

R

b

I E

M

r

· ·

1

ρ

f

cc

d

/

A

sc

d-x ε

st

ε

sc

ε

cc

x

f

sc

T

s

T

c

C

s

C

c

SECTION STRAIN STRESS

FORCE

DIAGRAM DIAGRAM DIAGRAM

DIAGRAM

Figure 1.4: Section properties of a uncracked r.c. element (Figure

3.1(b) of BS 8110:

Part 2), with

x D

cc

3

1

·

and

) (

3

2

x d D

ct

− ·

(a) Establish the equivalent area of the transformed section

[ ]

st sc e e

A A bh A + + · α

(b) Find the depth of the neutral axis, taking moment of area about the

compression fibres

( )

e

st sc e

A

d A d A

h

b

x

+ +

·

/

2

2

α

(c) Find the second moment of area about the neutral axis

( ) ( )

2

/ 2

2

3

2 12

d x A x d A x

h

bh

bh

I

sc e st e xx

− + − +

,

_

¸

¸

− + · α α

(d) Find the curvature

xx c

I E

M

r

·

1

(iv) Curvature Due to Long Term Loads

(a) Creep: See BS 8110: Part 2 Section 7.3

(b) Shrinkage: See BS 8110: Part 2 Section 7.4

Step 3: Calculation of Deflection from Curvatures

The deflected shape of a member is related to the curvatures by Eqn 10 of

BS 8110: Part 2, thus:

2

2

1

dx

a d

r

x

·

; Equation 10 (BS 8110 Part 2)

where,

x

r

1

is the curvature at x and as computed above

a

is the deflection at x.

10

D

ct

f

ct

f

st

d

/

d

b

h

A

st

Deflections may be computed directly from this equation by calculating

the curvatures at successive sections along the member, and using a

numerical integration technique.

Alternatively, the simplified scheme given by Eqn 11 of BS 8110: Part 2

can be used

b

r

kl a

1

2

·

; Equation 11 (BS 8110 Part 2)

Where

b

r

1

is the curvature at mid-span or, for cantilever,

at the support section

l is the effective span of the member

k is a constant that depends on shape of the bending

moment diagram.

The various coefficients of k for common shapes of bending moment

diagram are given in Table 3.1 of BS 8110: Part 2 page 3/5.

11

12

11.3 CRACK CONTROL AND CALCULATION IN REINFORCED

CONCRETE STRUCTURES

11.3.1 Introduction

The presence of the crack does not necessarily mean that the structure

will collapse, but it is a signal that the behaviour of the structure

should be considered more carefully.

Cracking may detract from the appearance of the structure, permit

ingress of moisture and lead to corrosion of steel. Excessive cracking and

wide cracks will thus affect the durability of the structure.

An accurate prediction of the initiation of cracks and the subsequent

monitoring of their behaviour during the structure’s response to loading

play a significant role in the prediction of the general safety of the

structure.

11.3.2 Sequence of Crack Formation

RC elements experience cracks in the tension face when the tensile

strength of the concrete is exceeded. The tensile strength of concrete is

generally less than 20% of the compressive strength.

Primary cracks form first and as applied moment increases secondary

cracks follow. The width of secondary crack at a point on the surface of a

beam is affected by:

1 Surface strains which can be found by analyzing the section

assuming the section remains plane in accordance with Bernoulli’s

beam theory

2 The distance of the point from a point of zero crack width. The

points of zero crack width are the neutral axis and the surface of

longitudinal reinforcing bars. The larger the distance of point from

the points of zero crack width, the larger the cracks width will be as

shown in Figure 1.1 below.

13

Figure 2.1: Critical locations for cracking in a beam are:

• At A equidistant between the neutral axis and the bar

surface.

• At B equidistant between the bar.

• At C on the corner of the beam.

11.3.3 Code Provision for Cracks

The following sections in BS 8110: Part 1, Sections 2.2.3; 2.2.3.4.1;

3.12.11.2 and BS 8110: Part 2: Sections 3.8.1 and Section 8 deal with

crack phenomena in reinforced concrete structures.

11.3.4 Sources of Cracks in Reinforced Concrete

(i) Incorrect detailing is the most common source of cracking in RC

structures. For example, wrong or no placement of movement joint

during detailing and construction. Movement joints are provided to

reduce or eliminate cracking by permitting relative movement to

occur. Movement joints are covered in BS 8110: Part 2, Section 8.

The various types of movement joints as shown in Figure 1.2 are:

• Contraction/expansion joints

• Sliding joints

• Hinged joints

• Settlement joints;

Figure 2.2 Joints in R.C. Structures

(ii) Errors in design calculation and detailing;

(iii) Reinforcing bar spacing limits in tension zones;

14

(iv) Amount of reinforcing bars;

(v) Poor construction methods such as:

• Incorrect placement of steel leading to insufficient cover

• In adequate cover to reinforcement

• Poor curing - loss of water can cause shrinkage cracking.

During curing the concrete should be kept damp and covered;

(vi) External physical and mechanical factors such as:

(a) Restraint of elements against movement causes cracking. The

movement might be due to elastic deformation, creep under

constant load, shrinkage on drying and settlement of

foundations; changes in temperature and moisture content.

(b) Overloading the structure - overloading may be brought about

by change of function of the building or room i.e. classroom

changed to library increases Imposed Loading which was not

catered for in the earlier design.

(c) Structure settlement namely:

Differential settlement of foundation can cause

cracking,

Shrinkage of clays from ground dewatering,

Drying out in droughts,

Tree roots causing disruptions,

Ground movement from nearby excavations.

11.3.5 Crack Control

Cracking should be kept within reasonable limits. A maximum surface

crack width of 0.3 mm is appropriate, as stipulated in BS 8110: Part 1

Section 3.12.11.2, and can be achieved if correct detailing is done. This

can be controlled by adhering to detailing rules with regard to bar spacing

in zones where the concrete is in tension. However, if this limit will impair

the efficiency of the structure a smaller value may be more appropriate.

For instance for water tightness values of 0.2 mm or even 0.1 mm may be

adopted.

BS 8110: Part 1 Section 2.2.3.4.1 specifies two methods of crack control.

(i) Limiting maximum bar spacing in the tension zone of

members under normal situations - maximum spacing is specified in

BS 8110: Part 1 Section 3.12.11.2 Table 3.30.

(ii) Use of the formula provided in BS 8110: Part 2 Section

3.8 for assessing the design crack width, in special cases.

In addition, however, the following should be complied with:

(a) Allowance should be made for stiffening effects of concrete in the

tension zone, and for creep and shrinkage;

(b) Minimum areas of steel to control cracking in beams as per BS

8110: Part 1 Section 3.12.5.3, Table 3.27;

(c) Bar spacing control rules to limit crack width to 0.3mm, thus:

15

• Bars of diameter less than 0.45 of the largest diameter should

be ignored except when considering beam side face bars.

• Refer to Figure 2.3 below for bar spacing control to limit crack

width.

Figure 2.3: Illustration of bar spacing rules

Bar spacing rules;

•

b

a

should not be greater than values specified in Table 3.30

of BS 8110 Part 1

• s

b

should not be greater than 250 mm

• Clear spacing,

b

a

≥

y

b

f

β 75000

≤ 300; where

tion redistribu before Moment

tion redistribu after Moment

b

· β

For β

b

= 0; maximum

b

a

= 300 mm, for f

y

= 250 N/mm

2

and

maximum

b

a

= 160 mm for f

y

= 460 N/mm

2

• An alternative method of computing

b

a

is:

16

Clear spacing,

b

a

≥

s

f

47000

≤ 300; where f

s

is the service stress

determined using Equation 8

Table 3.10 (BS 8110: Part 1)

b prov s

req s y

s

X

A

A f

f

β

1

3

2

.

·

Equation 8 of BS 8110: Part 1; 1997

•

c

a

should not be greater than 0.5 of

b

a

• If h exceeds 750 add bars as indicated in Figure 2.3 above, on

the right hand side (as per Section 3.12.11.2.6 of BS 8110: Part 1:

1997). Otherwise the side reinforcement is not necessary, as on the

left hand side.

• The size of the side bar should not be less than that specified

in BS 8110: Part 1 Section 3.12.5.4

( )

y

b

f

b a

• The maximum clear spacing for slabs is given in BS 8110: Part

1 Section 3.12.11.7. Other control measures are outlined in

3.12.11.8 for slabs.

11.3.6 Calculation of Crack Width

11.3.6.1 General

The equations for assessing crack width for flexure and direct tension are

stipulated in BS 8110: Part 2 Section 3.8. The computation of the crack

width for flexure and direct tension shall be treated separately in this

course.

11.3.6.2 Crack width calculation for reinforced concrete

elements in flexure

The design crack width,

cr

w

, at any point on the surface of the tension

zone of the element under flexure is calculated using Equation 12 of BS

8110: Part 2, thus:

1

]

1

¸

−

−

+

·

x h

c a

a

w

cr

m cr

cr

min

2 1

3 ε

Eqn. 12 (BS 8110: Part 2)

Where;

cr

a

is the distance of the point considered to the

surface of the nearest longitudinal bar,

ε

m

is the average strain at the level where the

cracking is being considered,

c

min

is the minimum cover to the tension steel,

h is the overall depth of the element,

x is the depth of the neutral axis.

17

This is provided that the strains, ε

st

, in the tension reinforcement is not

greater than

1

]

1

¸

s

y

E

f 8 . 0

, viz. the steel has not yielded.

Determination of ε

m

An approximate method for the determination of ε

m

is given in BS 8110

Part 2 Section 3.8.3.

For a rectangular tension zone, use Equation 13 given in BS 8110 Part 2

Section 3.8.3, thus;

( ) ( )

( )

1

]

1

¸

−

− −

− ·

x d A E

x a x h b

s s

t

m

3

'

1

ε ε Eqn. 13 (BS 8110: Part 2)

Where; ε

1

Strain at level being considered,

calculated while ignoring the stiffening effect

of the concrete in the tension zone.

'

a Distance from the compression face to the

point at which the crack width is being

considered/calculated.

b

t

Width of the section at the centroid of the

tension steel.

E

s

Modulus of elasticity of the reinforcement

A

s

Area of tension reinforcement

The term within the square brackets defines the

tension stiffening effect.

If the whole section is in tension an effective value of (h–x) can be

estimated by interpolation between the following conditions:

(a) Where the n.a. is at the compression face (h-x) = h, i.e.

x

=0

(b) For axial tension with (h-x) = 2h

NOTE

1. If ε

m

< 0 the section is not cracked.

2. The modulus of elasticity of the concrete is taken as 0.5 of the

instantaneous value (see Table 7.2 Part 2 BS 8110).

3. For high drying shrinkage, viz. > 0.0006, ε

m

should be

increased by adding 50% of the shrinkage strains. Otherwise,

in normal cases shrinkage may be neglected.

Implications of Equation 13 of BS 8110: Part 2

The following can be illustrated diagrammatically as shown in Figure 2.4

overleaf:

18

1. Along the bottom edge in the region of maximum tension for

which

'

a = h

ε

m

becomes

( )

( )

1

1

]

1

¸

−

−

− ·

x d A E

x h b

s s

t

m

3

2

1

ε ε

, a constant value. So in the crack

width formula

cr

a

is the only variable and as the maximum value of

cr

a

is midway between bars, the maximum crack width occurs at this

point.

2. Immediately below the reinforcing bar,

cr

a

is a minimum and

equals to c

min

, so crack width = 3 c

min

ε

m

and is the minimum value.

3. At the corner

cr

a

=

c

a

which is greater than c

min

so the crack

in wider.

4. Moving up the side of the beam;

• ε

m

decreases linearly from a maximum at the corner of the beam

to zero at the n.a.

• The value of

cr

a

decreases to a minimum at the level of the

reinforcement and then increases up to the level of n.a. If no

further longitudinal bars are encountered.

• It will be found that the maximum value of the crack width occurs

at about 1/3 of the distance between the longitudinal steel and

the n.a.

Note that these comments assume that the maximum tensile stress is in

the span of the element. Where the maximum stress occurs in the top of

the element, e.g. over support, the diagram will be inverted.

19

Figure 2.4: Significant factors in calculating crack width.

11.3.6.2Calculation of crack width for reinforced concrete

elements in direct tension

Direct tension as a predominant force is unlikely to occur in normal

building structures, but direct tension forces in combination with bending

moments may occur. In this case the neutral axis will be calculated taking

into account the tension, following which the calculations for flexural crack

width will be as before.

The limit of flexure being predominant is where the neutral axis is at the

top face of the member shown in Figure 2.4, viz. when x=0. The equation

for the crack width now becomes

1

]

1

¸

−

+

·

h

c a

a

w

cr

m cr

cr

min

2 1

3 ε

20

And, the tension stiffening effect

d A E

h b

s s

t

3

2

·

When the whole section is in tension it is suggested that the modification

given in 3.8.3(b), viz. the parameter (h – x) = 2h for axial tension is used.

The equation for the crack width then becomes;

m cr cr

a w ε 3 ·

(for c

min

=

cr

a

) and

s s

t

m

A E

h b

3

2

1

− · ε ε

; for (d-x) ≈ (h-x) and (

'

a -x) = (h-x).

where; A

s

is the total area of steel in

the section, equally divided

between the two faces.

The most obvious case of axial tension is the hoop tension in a circular

tank containing water. In the Code for liquid-retaining structure the

maximum crack width is 0.2mm. Designers of these structures are

interested primarily in serviceability limit state of cracking. A calculation is

required at ultimate limit state, but if the walls are cracked and water is

leaking out, the tank is unserviceable and a factor of safety at ultimate is

irrelevant.

A designer can select an arrangement of bars to suit a particular wall

thickness, tensile force, cover and crack width requirement.

11.3.7 Examples of Crack Width Calculation

11.3.7.1 Crack width calculation for a rectangular beam

Calculate design crack widths at critical positions for the internal support

section of the following two-span continuous beam for which 15%

redistribution has been allowed at the ultimate limit state.

21

Figure 2.5:

Assuming a concrete cover of 45 mm and Φ=40 mm, from the diagram it

can be seen that the distance between the bars is 130mm, which is less

than the value given in Table 3.30 (BS8110 Part 1). The formula below the

table gives the upper limit to be 138.6mm. The distance to the corner of

the beam is 68.5 mm, which is also within the limit (0.5

b

a

).

(1) Calculate internal support moment due to service load.

kNm

X

M

s

463

8

10 ) 15 22 (

2

·

+

·

(2) Calculate properties of equivalent transformed section with

2

c

e

E

E ·

2

28

mm

kN

E

c

·

from Table 7.2 in Part 2 so

2

14

mm

kN

E

e

·

14

14

200

· · ·

c

s

e

E

E

α

17 . 0

690 300

2510 14

· ·

X

X

so

e

ρ α

( ) [ ] 427 . 0 2 · + + − · ρ α ρ α ρ α

e e e

d

x

mm z and mm x so 8 . 591 6 . 294 · ·

(3) Calculate average surface strain at top of beam

( )

2 2

6

368 8 . 0 7 . 311

8 . 591 2510

10 463

mm

N

f

mm

N

X

X

z A

M

f

y

s

s

s

· < · · ·

22

Figure 2.6:

001558 . 0

10 200

7 . 311

3

· · ·

X E

f

s

s

s

ε

ε

1

=

00179 . 0 001558 . 0

4 . 395

4 . 455

· ·

−

−

· X

x d

x h

s h

ε ε

00169 . 0

000104 . 0 00179 . 0

4 . 395 2510 10 200 3

) 4 . 455 ( 300

00179 . 0

) ( 3

) (

3

2

2

·

− ·

− ·

−

−

− ·

X X X X

x d A E

x h b

s s

t

h mh

ε ε

(4) Calculate crack widths at critical position

(a) Top of beam

Maximum crack width occurs midway between bars, where

( ) mm a

m

84 20 85 60

2 2

· − + ·

) ( 40

min

face top mm c ·

) 3 . 0 ( 36 . 0

4 . 455

40 84

2 1

10 7 . 1 84 3

2 1

3

3

min

mm mm

X X X

x h

c a

a

w

cr

m cr

cr

> ·

1

]

1

¸

−

+

·

1

]

1

¸

−

−

+

·

−

ε

(b) At corner of beam

mm a

c

5 . 68 ·

) 3 . 0 ( 31 . 0

4 . 455

40 5 . 68

2 1

10 7 . 1 5 . 68 3

2 1

3

3

min

mm mm

X X X

x h

c a

a

w

cr

m cr

cr

> ·

1

]

1

¸

−

+

·

1

]

1

¸

−

−

+

·

−

ε

(c) On side of beam

Critical position approximately (d-x)/3 from reinforcement, which is 263

mm from neutral axis

23

mm a 2 . 558 6 . 263 6 . 294

'

· + ·

00098 . 0 0017 . 0

4 . 455

6 . 263

'

· ·

−

−

· X

x h

x a

mh m

ε ε

( ) mm a d a

cr

5 . 124 20 ) 129 65 ( 20 ) ( 65

2 2 2 ' 2

· − + · − − + ·

) ( 45

min

face side mm c ·

) 3 . 0 ( 27 . 0

4 . 455

45 5 . 124

2 1

10 8 . 9 5 . 124 3

2 1

3

4

min

mm mm

X X X

x h

c a

a

w

cr

m cr

cr

< ·

1

]

1

¸

−

+

·

1

]

1

¸

−

−

+

·

−

ε

From these calculations it can be seen that although the spacing of the

bars comply with the bar spacing rules, the calculated crack widths in 4(a)

and (b) exceed 0.3mm. This is one of the cases where the calculation does

improve on the rules, and in deep beams this does appear to be the case.

A better condition would be achieved by using 3/32 bars

11.3.7.7 Crack width calculation for a T-beam

The section and reinforcement at mid-span of a simply supported T-beam

are shown in Figure 2.7. The total moment at the section due to service

loads is 111.6 kNm. The materials are Grade 30 concrete and Grade 460

reinforcement. Determine the crack width (a) at the corner A, (b) at the

center of the tension face B and (c) the side face C, midway between the

neutral axis and the surface of the tension reinforcement.

The properties of the transformed section are computed first. The values

for the moduli of elasticity are as follows:

Reinforcement

2

200

mm

kN

E

s

·

Concrete

2

13 26

2

1

mm

kN

X E

e

· ·

Modular ratio

4 . 15

13

200

· · ·

C

S

c

E

E

α

The transformed section is shown in Figure 1.7(b). The neutral axis is

located first, taking moment of area about n.a.

) 300 ( 22669 ) 45 ( 6191 725

2

x x x − · − +

Solve to give x = 80.9mm

24

Figure 2.7: (a) Section: (b) transformed section (c) crack locations and

dimensions (d) stress diagram

The moment of inertia about the neutral axis is

4 8

2 2

3

10 22 . 13

1 . 219 22669 9 . 35 6191

3

9 . 80

1450

mm X

X X X I

xx

·

+ + ·

The stress in the tension steel is:

2

8

6

8 . 284

10 22 . 13

4 . 15 1 . 219 10 6 . 111

mm

N

X

X X X

f

t

·

·

The strain in the tension steel is:

3

3

10 424 . 1

10 200

8 . 284

−

·

·

X

X

s

ε

Neglect the stiffening effect of the concrete in tension in the flange of the

T-beam.

25

(a) Crack width at A

The strain in the concrete at A is:

3

3

1

10 749 . 1

9 . 80 300

) 9 . 80 350 ( 10 424 . 1

−

−

·

−

−

·

X

X X

ε

The strain reduction due to the stiffening effect of the concrete in the

tension zone, where mm h a 350

'

· · is:

5

3

2

10 35 . 9

) 300 ( 1472 10 200 3

) 9 . 80 350 ( 250

−

·

−

−

X

x X X X

The average strain at the crack location is therefore:

3 3

10 635 . 1 10 ) 094 . 0 749 . 1 (

− −

· − · X X

m

ε

The design surface crack width at A where

mm c and mm a

cr

5 . 37 2 . 58

min

· ·

is

mm

X X X

x h

c a

a

w

cr

m cr

cr

25 . 0

9 . 80 350

5 . 37 2 . 58

2 1

10 655 . 1 2 . 58 3

2 1

3

3

min

·

1

]

1

¸

−

−

+

·

1

]

1

¸

−

−

+

·

−

ε

(b) Crack width at B (Figure 1.5(c))

The dimension

mm a

cr

50 ·

and the average strain

3

10 655 . 1

−

· X

m

ε

Therefore crack width = 0.23mm

(c) Crack width at C

C is midway between the neutral axis and the surface of the

reinforcement (Figure 1.7(c)). The location of C is found by successive

trail. If C is 108.7mm from the neutral axis, it is also 108.7mm from the

surface of the bar and a

’

= 189.6mm.

The strain in the concrete at C is:

3

3

1

10 706 . 0

9 . 80 300

7 . 108 10 424 . 1

−

−

·

−

·

X

X X

ε

The strain reduction due to the stiffening effect of the concrete is:

26

5

3

10 78 . 3

) 9 . 80 300 ( 1472 10 200 3

) 9 . 80 6 . 189 ( ) 9 . 80 350 ( 250

−

·

−

− −

X

X X X

The average strain at the crack location is:

3 3

10 668 . 0 10 ) 038 . 0 706 . 0 (

− −

· − · X X

m

ε

The design surface crack width at C where a

cr

= 108.7mm is:

mm

X X X

x h

c a

a

w

cr

m cr

cr

14 . 0

9 . 80 350

5 . 37 7 . 108

2 1

10 668 . 0 7 . 108 3

2 1

3

3

min

·

1

]

1

¸

−

−

+

·

1

]

1

¸

−

−

+

·

−

ε

All crack width are less than 0.3mm and are thus satisfactory

11.3.7.3 Crack width calculation for an element in direct tension

The hoop tension force in the wall of a tank is 570kN/m. The wall is 200

thick, cover to reinforcement is 40mm, and the limiting crack width is

0.2mm. Check that T16 at 150 centres each face is satisfactory.

m

mm

A Total

s

2

2680 ·

00106 . 0

10 200 2680

10 570

3

3

1

· ·

X X

X

ε

00025 . 0

2680 10 200 3

200 1000 2

3

· ·

X X X

X X

g stiffennin Tensioning

00081 . 0 00025 . 0 00106 . 0 · − ·

m

ε

81 8 75 48

2 2

· − + ·

cr

a

mm X X w

cr

197 . 0 00081 . 0 81 3 · ·

27

- Help File for Spreader DesignUploaded bypandiangv
- 150T Bin Design ReportUploaded bygopalakrishnannrm1202
- CHP4.pdfUploaded byGaurav Agarwal
- Analytical Solution for Fixed-End Beam Subjected to Uniform LoadUploaded bytalal2124
- 1）notes_22_plate_bendin[1].pdfUploaded byjianjungbd
- 05-03ChapGere[1]Uploaded byMayil Vahanan
- The Winkler Model and Its Application to SoilUploaded byspiderthan
- Curved Prestressed BeamUploaded bya96lhf
- 367079729-PRACTICE-PROBLEMS-IN-TIMBER-DESIGN.pdfUploaded byRuby Asensi
- Mat Chapter24wexUploaded byhemant_durgawale
- Vertical LouversUploaded byRomil Sampayo
- Design of Steel Structures.21-30Uploaded bynazir ali
- Example FeabendUploaded byRicardo Colosimo
- Individual Report hjbftyfujlUploaded byMuhammadShahidHussain
- Chapter 5 98Uploaded bymasturaabdulrahim
- e04eng - Uso de Vigas FriendlyUploaded byCamv Ventura
- Advanced mechanics of solidsUploaded byVyankatesh Ashtekar
- Mathcad - Aibox_tbUploaded bysere
- B.arch. I to X Curriculum and SyllabusUploaded byJradha Jram
- Reinforced Concrete Beam Design - DeflectionsUploaded byAfzal Kareem
- Glulam curved beam design to EC5Uploaded byBurak Kırcal
- ICS SyllabusUploaded byAmi Mce Bhaskar
- CE GATE-2018 Paper 11-FEB-2018 Morning SessionUploaded byNishit kumar
- B.ARCH syllabusUploaded byPratha Bisani
- Http Www.inrisk.ubc.CA Process.php File=STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Kirchhoff PlatesUploaded bycustomerx
- CFD-CSA-A23.3-04Uploaded bythanzawtun1981
- Simply Supported and Continuous BridgesUploaded byNoman Ali
- Examen_2013-03-15Uploaded byDavid Teixidó
- 5.Winter-13Uploaded byharnishtanna21285
- dosnvn-140604230333-phpapp02Uploaded byPrakhar Agrawal

- AnalysisRCFramesUploaded byGerald Maginga
- VitunguuUploaded byGerald Maginga
- Tomato BookletUploaded byGerald Maginga
- Lecture No.5 - Bridge-LoadsUploaded byGerald Maginga
- Lecture No.8 - Bridge FoundationsUploaded byGerald Maginga
- CI in TanzaniaUploaded byGerald Maginga
- Application of Preference Scheme in the Evalauation of Proposals and BidsUploaded byGerald Maginga
- TM 420 Lecture 10 Cost ManagementUploaded byGerald Maginga
- Procurement of Smaller WorksUploaded byGerald Maginga
- Chapter OneUploaded byGerald Maginga
- VitunguuUploaded byGerald Maginga
- WR230 L12 Sedimentation.pptUploaded byGerald Maginga
- Tanzania_Field Testing Manual (2003).pdfUploaded byGerald Maginga
- TPJ5 of 2017 FinalUploaded byGerald Maginga
- Construction Project DeliveryUploaded byGerald Maginga
- Pretender ChecklistUploaded byGerald Maginga
- Piling Health HazardsUploaded byGerald Maginga
- Truss MethodUploaded byGerald Maginga
- 2.0 Cross Section DesignUploaded byGerald Maginga
- CrackingUploaded byGerald Maginga
- How Cement Ismade 2008Uploaded byGerald Maginga
- Abutment DesignUploaded byGerald Maginga
- Transportation EngineeringUploaded byGerald Maginga
- Overview of Construction Planning TechniquesUploaded byGerald Maginga
- 7.0 Super Elevation DesignUploaded byGerald Maginga
- Pre Stress LossesUploaded byGerald Maginga
- Lecture 15 - Earned Value AnalysisUploaded byGerald Maginga
- Shear WallsUploaded byGerald Maginga
- Example Mtd StatementUploaded byGerald Maginga
- Design Of Steel StructuresUploaded byGerald Maginga