## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

Random Variable

l In the stochastic approach (as opposed to deterministic approach), we treat reservoir properties as a random variable l A random variable, z, can take a series of outcomes or realizations ( zi, i=1, 2, 3,.....N) with a given set of probability of occurrences (pi, i =1, 2,...N).

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

Distribution Function

Mean Frequency of Occurrence

Variance

zi Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

**Histograms and Cumulative Distribution Function
**

250 200 Frequency 150 100 50 0 100.00% 90.00% 80.00% 70.00% 60.00%

Frequency Cumulative %

50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% .00%

4.642 10.00

0.005

46.42

100.0

215.4

464.2

0.001

0.002

0.010

0.022

0.100

Permeability Range, md

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

2.154

21.54

0.046

0.215

0.464

1.000

1000.

**Producing Cumulative Distribution Function from the Data
**

• Sort the data in increasing order

X 1 ≤ X 2 ≤ X 3 ≤ ... ≤ X N

• Assign a probability pi to the event ( X • pi =(i-1/2)/N • Plot Xi versus pi

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

≤ Xi )

PROBABILITY PLOT

Estimated Permeability Data Set 109 Data Points, Mean = 0.36 Median = 0.10

Calculated Permeability Data Set 10

1

0.1

0.01

0.001 1

2

5

10 15 20

30

40 50 60 70 80 85 Probability , % Less Than

90

95

98

99

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

Statistics Review

Univariate Statistics: Basics

Expected value = Mean = Arithmetic Average N

E( z) = m =

∑

1 ˆ pi z i ≅ m = N

∑z

i =1

i

Variance = a measure of the spread of a distribution about its mean

VAR( z ) = σ 2 = E ([ zi − m])2 = E ( zi2 ) − m2 z

1 ˆ z2 = ≅σ ( N − 1)

∑

i =1

N

ˆ ( z i − m) 2

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

Coefficient of Variation

Coefficient of Variation Cv is a dimensionless measure of spread of the distribution and is commonly Used to quantify permeability heterogeneity

•

ˆ σ CV = m

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

**Cv for Different Rock Types
**

Carbonate (mixed pore type) 22 S. North Sea Rotliegendes Fm (6) 21 (4) Crevasse splay sst (5) 20 Shallow marine rippled micaceous sst 19 Fluvial lateral accretion sst (5) 18 Distributary/tidal channel Etive ssts 17 Beach/stacked tidal Etive Fm. 16 Heterolitthic channel fill 15 Shallow marine HCS 14 Shallow marine high contrast lamination 13 Shallow marine Lochaline Sst (3) 12 Shallow marine Rannoch Fm 11 Aeolian interdune (1) 10 Shallow marine SCS 9 Large scale cross-bed channel (5) 8 Mixed aeolian wind ripple/grainflow (1) 7 Fluvial trough-cross beds (5) 6 Fluvial trough-cross beds (2) 5 Shallow marine low contrast lamination 4 Aeolian grainflow (1) 3 Aeolian wind ripple (1) Homogeneous core plugs 2 1 Synthetic core plugs

23

Very heterogeneous

Heterogeneous

Homogeneous

0

0

1

2

3

4

Cv Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

Q-Q / P-P Plots

**l Compares two univariate distributions l Q-Q plot is a plot of matching quartiles
**

– a straight line implies that the two distributions have the same shape. a straight line implies that the two distributions have the same shape.

**l P-P plot is a plot of matching cumulative probabilities
**

–

l Q-Q plot has units of the data, l P-P plots are always scaled between 0 and 1

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

**Q-Q plot of permeability vs. porosity
**

1.E+02 1.E+01 Permeability 1.E+00 1.E-01 1.E-02 1.E-03 0.001

0.010 Porosity

0.100

1.000

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

Data Transformation

Why do we need to worry about data transformation? l Attributes, such as permeability, with highly skewed data distributions present problems in variogram calculation; the extreme values have a significant impact on the variogram. l One common transform is to take logarithms, y = log10 ( z ) perform all statistical analyses on the transformed data, and back transform at the end → back transform is sensitive l Many geostatistical techniques require the data to be transformed to a Gaussian or normal distribution. The Gaussian RF model is unique in statistics for its extreme analytical simplicity and for being the limit distribution of many analytical theorems globally known as “central limit theorems” The transform to any distribution (and back) is easily accomplished by the quantile transform

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

**Normal Scores Transformation
**

l Many geostatistical techniques require the data to be transformed to a Gaussian or normal distribution:

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

**Standard Normal Distribution z = (w-µ)/σ
**

Cum. Normal pdf Normal 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0

**0.6827 0.9545 0.9973
**

1 2 3

-3

-2

-1

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

Exercises

l Univariate analysis of well log data l Distribution Characteristics l Heterogeneity Measures

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

Statistics Review

Bivariate Statistics The Covariance and the Variogram are related measures of the joint variation of two random variables.

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

Statistics Review

Covariance

COV ( A, B ) = E ([ Ai − mA ][ Bi − mB ]) = E ( Ai Bi ) − mA mB

∃ = 1 ≅ CAB N

∃ ∃ ∑ (a b ) − m m

i i A i =1

N

B

**>0 if A, B are positively correlated CAB = 0 if A, B are independent < 0 if A, B are negatively correlated
**

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

Statistics Review

Variogram

2γ ( A, B ) = E ([ A − B]2 ) 1 ∃ ≅ 2γ = N

∑ (a

i =1

N

i

− bi )

2

γÙ0 γÙ∝

**A is increasingly similar to B A is increasingly dissimilar to B
**

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

Spatial Variation

Assume: Variation in a property between two points depends only on vector distance, not on location. Model Variability: Variogram γ ( h ) = Covariance

1 2N h [ζ ( xi ) − ζ ( xi + h )]2 ∑

i =1 Nh

1 c( h ) = Nh

ζ ( xi )ζ ( xi + h ) − m2 ∑ i =1

Nh

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

**Modeling Spatial Variation
**

l zi =z(xi) is some property at location xi l Interpret zi as a random variable with a probability distribution and the set of zi to define a random function z. l Assume the variability between z(xi) and z(xi+h) depends only on vector h, not on location xi*.

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

**Modeling Spatial Variation
**

l Use variogram and/or covariance to model variability

1 2γ (h) = 2γˆ ( h) = Nh 1 ˆ COV ( h) = c(h) = Nh

∑

i =1

Nh

[ z ( xi ) − z ( xi + h)]2 ˆ z ( xi ) z ( xi + h) − m z2

∑

i =1

Nh

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

Data Sources

l Lots of wells in subject reservoir l Lots of wells in similar reservoir l Outcrops l Secondary and soft data (seismic, interval constraints, expert judgement)

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

Porosity Log

11600 11500

11400 Depth, ft

11300

11200

11100

11000 0

0.1

0.2 0.3 Porosity, fraction

0.4

Depth Porosity 11060 0.083 11060.5 0.074 11061 0.062 11061.5 0.058 11062 0.061 11062.5 0.066 11063 0.07 11063.5 0.073 11064 0.078 11064.5 0.079 11065 0.075 11065.5 0.072 11066 0.072 11066.5 0.074 11067 0.075 11067.5 0.077 11068 0.098 11068.5 0.129 11069 0.151 11069.5 0.157

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

Variogram Calculation

φ (u) 0.083 0.074 0.062 0.058 0.061 0.066 0.07 0.073 0.078 0.079 0.075 0.072 0.072 0.074 0.075 0.077 0.098 0.129 0.151 φ (u+h) 0.074 0.062 0.058 0.061 0.066 0.07 0.073 0.078 0.079 0.075 0.072 0.072 0.074 0.075 0.077 0.098 0.129 0.151 0.157 φ (u) 0.083 0.074 0.062 0.058 0.061 0.066 0.07 0.073 0.078 0.079 0.075 0.072 0.072 0.074 0.075 0.077 0.098 0.129 φ (u+h) 0.062 0.058 0.061 0.066 0.07 0.073 0.078 0.079 0.075 0.072 0.072 0.074 0.075 0.077 0.098 0.129 0.151 0.157

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

0.35 0.3

Variogram Calculation

0.35 0.3 R 2 = 0.9812 R 2 = 0.8761 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 Lag=0.5 Lag=1.5 0.05 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.35 R 2 = 0.7653 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 Lag = 10 0.1 Lag=2.5 0.05 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 R2 = 0.352 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0

0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0

l As the separation distance increases, the similarity between pairs of values decreases

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

Variogram Definition

1.2

Increasing variability

Sill - No correlation 1

Variogram

0.8 Range 0.6 Model Fit Experimental

0.4

Nugget Effect

0.2

0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Distance 35 40 45 50

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

Variogram Model

Variogram improves with increasing:

- Number of data pairs at each lag spacing. - Number of lags with data.

**è Lots of data required for statistically significant variogram.
**

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

Variogram Terminology

l Sill – the variance of the data (1.0 if the data are normal scores) – The plateau that the variogram reaches at the range l Range – As the separation distance between pairs increases, the corresponding variogram value will generally increase. Eventually, an increase in the separation distance no longer causes a corresponding increase in the averaged squared difference between pairs of values.The distance at which the variogram reaches this plateau is the range l Nugget effect – natural short-range variability (microstructure) and measurement error – Although the value of the variogram for h=0 is strictly 0, several factors, such as sampling error and short term variability, may cause sample value separated by extremely short distances to be quite dissimilar. This causes a discontinuity from the value of 0 at the origin to the value of the variogram at extremely small separation distances

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

Variogram Characteristics

γ γ

h

Low Spatial Correlation

h

High Spatial Correlation

α1 α2 α3

γ

h

Anisotropic

**All geological inference is buried in the variogram.
**

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

**Variograms Modeling Spatial Correlation
**

l The shape of the variogram model determines the spatial continuity of the random function model l Measures must be customized for each field and each attribute (φ,Κ) l Depending on the level of diagenesis, the spatial variability may be similar within similar depositional environments.

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

**Variogram and Covariance
**

l Assuming second order stationarity, the following relationship applies.

**γ (h) = var(z)− cov(h) ⇒ cov(h) = cov(0)−γ (h)
**

l These are important relationships to be used during kriging using variograms.

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

**Variogram Interpretation Geometric Anisotropy
**

Same shape and sill but different ranges

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

**Variogram Interpretation Cyclicity
**

1 1 2 φ 1 Depth Distance 2 3 3 Sill 4

4

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

Variogram Interpretation Cyclicity

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

**Variogram Interpretation Zonal Anisotropy
**

Both sill and range vary in different directions

1

Variability ‘between wells’ ‘Within well’ variability Positive correlation over large distance

Well 1

Well 2

Well 3

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

Variogram Interpretation Zonal Anisotropy

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

**Variogram Interpretation Trend
**

1

Positive correlation Negative correlation

Distance Depth

Trend » non stationarity the mean is not constant

φ Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

Variogram Interpretation Vertical Trend and Horizontal Zonal Anisotropy

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

**Vertical Well Profile and Variogram with a Clearly Defined Vertical Trend
**

50 45 Regression: y = -1.5807x + 51.611 40 35

30 Depth

25

20

15

10

5

0 0 5 10 15 Porosity 20 25 30

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

**Vertical Well Profile and Variogram after Removal of the Vertical Trend
**

50 45 40

35

30 Depth

25

20

15

10

5

0 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 Re siduals 2 4 6 8

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

**Methodology for Variogram Interpretation and Modeling
**

l Compute and plot experimental variograms in what are believed to be the principal directions of continuity based on a-priori geological knowledge l Place a horizontal line representing the theoretical sill. l Remove all trends from data. l Interpretation – Short-scale variance: the nugget effect – Intermediate-scale variance: geometric anisotropy. – Large-scale variance: • zonal anisotropy • hole-effect l Modeling – Proceed to variogram modeling by selecting a model type (spherical, exponential, gaussian…) and correlation ranges for each structure

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

Exercises

l Vertical variogram calculations l Areal variogram calculations l Variogram modeling l Inference of spatial variation/correlations

Geostatistical Reservoir Characterization

- Intrduction to Reservoir Facies Modeling
- geostatistics
- Fractured Reservoirs Part 3
- Geostatistics in Petroleum Reservoir
- Geostatistical Reservoir Modeling
- Part One
- Introduction to Geostatistics Course Notes
- Variograms
- Building the Dynamic Reservoir Model (2)
- AVO Responses
- Variogram Modeling
- Integration of Well and Seismic Data Using Geostatistics-2
- M5 Facies Modeling
- Basic Geostatistics
- Uncertainty Analysis 2009
- Jensen et al. Statistics for Petroleum Engineers and Geoscientists (1997)
- Applied Petroleum Geoscince Course
- Statistical Method to Determine Petroleum Resources
- 7-reservoir modeling.pdf
- SCM Truncated Gaussian Algorithm Petrel 2010
- Reservoir Characterization
- Variogram Modeling, Defining Values to Variogram Adjustments in petrel
- Avo pdf
- Reservoir Geology and Modelling of Carboniferous
- Using Seismic Attributes
- variogramTutorial
- Calibration of Seismic and Well Data
- Volume Calculation Uncertainty
- Seismic Attributes - Tectonics

- tmp269C.tmp
- tmpAF07.tmp
- Named Entity Recognition for English Tweets using Random Kitchen Sink Algorithm
- commalds (1)
- tmp7FA7
- Heterogeneous Face Recognition Framework Using Multiple Filters for Person Identification
- tmpA6A6.tmp
- Feature Subset Selection for High Dimensional Data Based On Clustering
- OBoyle Aquinis 2012 Best and the Rest- Bell Curve
- tmpE2C4.tmp
- tmp6A1F.tmp
- wp16-15
- Personalized Gesture Recognition with Hidden Markove Model and Dynamic Time Warping
- tmpC387
- Smart Fire Detection System using Image Processing
- tmpB098.tmp
- Tmp 8456
- tmp65F5.tmp
- Taking risk out of systemic risk measurement
- Rough Set based Natural Image Segmentation under Game Theory Framework
- Multiple Person Tracking with Shadow Removal Using Adaptive Gaussian Mixture Model in Video Surveillance
- UT Dallas Syllabus for meco6315.501.10s taught by John Wiorkowski (wiorkow)
- Approximation of Gaussian derivatives for UWB communication
- tmp8F2A
- tmp911D.tmp
- tmp3BE1.tmp
- Image De-Noising using Wavelet Transform and Various Filters
- tmp560
- frbclv_wp1986-08.pdf
- tmpF1E6.tmp

- Linux 101
- Rock Physics and Fluid Substitution Modeling
- Remote Sensing
- Table of Laplace Transformations
- LSUGasMB
- geoeas
- 10 Geological Wonders
- Gnostic Astrology
- Vishnu Sahasranamam Sanskrit English
- Module Cubic EOS and Their Behavior
- API Gravity
- 3D Seismic Amplitude Data to Reduce Uncertainty G Varela_et_al
- Estimating Permeability Based on Pore Dimension
- सिद्ध अघोरास्त्र
- Panchmukhi Pooja
- Free Jazz RockLicks
- Black Belt Guitarist
- Learn Jazz Guitar With Conventional Script
- Reservoir Charactorization
- Durgati Nashini Durga
- Applied Non Parametric Regression
- Bilva Patra
- Basic Guitar Chords
- DRQUAK_Circuit for Bass Players
- Guitar With Power Tab Explained
- Ternary Thermometer 3 felspar 2 mica tested for granites
- Uncertainty Reduction in Field Development
- SETTING UP OF A SCIENCE CLUB IN SCHOOL IN DEVELOPING COUNTRY
- Pics of Naga Heritage from Nagaland, India

Sign up to vote on this title

UsefulNot usefulClose Dialog## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Close Dialog## This title now requires a credit

Use one of your book credits to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.

Loading