State of Minnesota County of Hennepin

CCT LIST CHARGE STATUTE ONLY MOC GOC

District Court Fourth Judicial District
Z1583 N
CTY ATTY FILE NO. CONTROLLING AGENCY CONTROL NO

___________________________________________________________________________________________ 1 609.322

13-4497
COURT CASE NO.

MN0270100

13000422

DATE FILED

Amended
if more than 6 counts (see attached) if Domestic Assault as defined by MS 518B01, sub2a,b

Tab Charge Previously Filed SUMMONS WARRANT ORDER OF DETENTION EXTRADITION

State of Minnesota,
PLAINTIFF, VS. NAME: first, middle, last SCOTT EUGENE POLLOCK DEFENDANT, 1817 E 115TH ST BURNSVILLE, MN 55337

SERIOUS FELONY FELONY GROSS MISDM DWI GROSS MISDM

Date of Birth 1/1/66

MNCIS #: LE#: SILS ID: TRACK ID:

27-CR13-10789 736978 2627231

___________________________________________________________________________________________

COMPLAINT
The Complainant, being duly sworn, makes complaint to the above-named Court and states that there is probable cause to believe that the Defendant committed the following offense(s). The complainant states that the following facts establish PROBABLE CAUSE:

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Complainant, Mark Elliott, of the Bloomington Police Department, has investigated the facts and circumstances of this offense and believes the following establishes probable cause: On or about January 11, 2013, Bloomington police received a call from the hotel manager at the Quality Inn & Suites on American Boulevard in Bloomington, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The manager complained that a “gang bang” was taking place in one of the rooms, and he wanted the individuals evicted. Upon arrival, police met with the manager, who handed them a business card he had obtained in the motel parking lot. The card was labeled “Scott GB Parties,” and identified “Scott” as a “Gang Bang Organizer.” The manager also told police that he had gone to a group e-mail website he obtained from the card, and it listed a girl named “Wendy” as the woman who would be part of the gang bang. In the message there was a “suggested donation” of $20.00 for the gang bang, and it listed the address of the motel and also the room number. At approximately 3:45 a.m., undercover police knocked on the door to the room. They were let in by a male, later identified as SCOTT EUGENE POLLOCK, DOB 1/1/1966 (Defendant). The police told the Defendant they were present for the gang bang, and the Defendant responded that “there is a $20.00 donation,” and held his hand out. While the Defendant was the only person in the front room of the suite, police could see a number of individuals in the back room. The two officers asked the Defendant if they could “tag team her and do her at the same time,” and the Defendant responded that they could do whatever they wanted as long as the girl was ok with it, and added, “her sucker is a little tired.”
FORM-J REV. 12/95

Page
SCOTT EUGENE POLLOCK (CCN No. 13000422)

2

Upon proceeding to the back room of the suite, the officers observed two men and two women sitting on chairs. On the bed, a woman was laying on her back. One male was having intercourse with her, while another male was kneeling next to her head as she was fondling his penis. Next to the woman on the bed was an ice bucket, about half full of condoms. There was also a garbage can next to that, filled with a number of used condoms. After about one minute of observation, the police informed the Defendant he was under arrest, and the other parties in the room were detained and identified. The Defendant had $470.00 in cash on his person. There was also a hand counter on a table displaying the number 31. The Defendant indicated that it was to count how many men the woman had sex with as she wanted to have sex with 45 guys. In a subsequent recorded interview, the Defendant waived his Miranda warnings and told police that he has been hosting gang bang parties for years, and collects “donations” at the door to cover his expenses. He admitted taking money from the two officers.

(OFFENSE PORTION OF COMPLAINT ON NEXT PAGE)

Page COMPLAINT SUPPLEMENT
CCT SECTION/Subdivision M.O.C. GOC

3

OFFENSE COUNT 1: SOLICITATION, INDUCEMENT AND PROMOTION OF PROSTITUTION (FELONY) MINN. STAT. § 609.322, SUBD. 1(a)(3) PENALTY: 0-20 YEARS AND/OR $50,000 That on or about January 11, 2013, in Hennepin County, Minnesota, SCOTT EUGENE POLLOCK, DOB 1/1/1966, received profit knowing or having reason to know that it was derived from prostitution, or the promotion of the prostitution, of an individual under the age of 18 years.

NOTICE: You must appear for every court hearing on this charge. A failure to appear for court on this charge is a criminal offense and may be punished as provided in Minn. Stat. § 609.49. THEREFORE, Complainant requests that said Defendant, subject to bail or conditions of release be: (1) arrested or that other lawful steps be taken to obtain defendant’s appearance in court; or (2) detained, if already in custody, pending further proceedings; and that said Defendant otherwise be dealt with according to law.
COMPLAINANT’S NAME: COMPLAINANT’S SIGNATURE:

Mark Elliott
DATE: Being duly authorized to prosecute the offense(s) charged, I hereby approve this Complaint. PROSECUTING ATTORNEY’S SIGNATURE:

tc PROSECUTING ATTORNEY:
NAME/TITLE: ADDRESS/TELEPHONE:

THAD N. TUDOR (0279936) Assistant County Attorney

C2100 Government Center, Minneapolis, MN 55487 Telephone: 612-543-0525

Page
Court Case # ________________________ This COMPLAINT was subscribed and sworn to before the undersigned this ____ day of __________________, 20___. NAME: SIGNATURE: TITLE:

4

FINDING OF PROBABLE CAUSE
From the above sworn facts, and any supporting affidavits or supplemental sworn testimony, I, the Issuing Officer, have determined that probable cause exists to support, subject to bail or conditions of release where applicable, Defendant(s) arrest or other lawful steps be taken to obtain Defendant(s) appearance in Court, or his detention, if already in custody, pending further proceedings. The Defendant(s) is/are thereof charged with the above-stated offense.

SUMMONS
THEREFORE YOU, THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANT(S), ARE HEREBY SUMMONED to appear on the _______ day of ____________________, 20_____ at _______ AM/PM before the above-named court at _______________________________________ _________________________________________________ to answer this complaint. IF YOU FAIL TO APPEAR in response to this SUMMONS, a WARRANT FOR YOUR ARREST shall be issued.

WARRANT EXECUTE IN MINNESOTA ONLY
To the sheriff of the above-named county; or other person authorized to execute this WARRANT; I hereby order, in the name of the State of Minnesota, that the above-named Defendant(s) be apprehended and arrested without delay and brought promptly before the above-named Court (if in session, and if not, before a Judge or Judicial Officer of such Court without unnecessary delay, and in any event not later than 36 hours after the arrest or as soon thereafter as such Judge or Judicial Officer is available) to be dealt with according to law.

ORDER OF DETENTION
Since the above-named Defendant(s) is already in custody; I hereby order, subject to bail or conditions of release, that the abovenamed Defendant(s) continue to be detained pending further proceedings. Bail: NBR/$75,000 (If Defendant fails to appear on Summons) Conditions of Release: Make all appearances

This COMPLAINT- SUMMONS duly subscribed and sworn to, is issued by the undersigned Judicial Officer this ____ day of _____________________________, 20____.

____________________________________________________________________________________________ NAME: SIGNATURE TITLE: JUDGE OF DISTRICT COURT

Sworn testimony has been given before the Judicial Officer by the following witnesses: STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Clerk's Signature or File Stamp:

STATE OF MINNESOTA Plaintiff vs. SCOTT EUGENE POLLOCK RETURN OF SERVICE I hereby Certify and Return that I have served a copy of this COMPLAINT – SUMMONS, WARRANT, ORDER OF DETENTION upon Defendant(s) herein-named. Signature of Authorized Service Agent:

Defendant(s).

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful