81 views

Uploaded by dgE

Riccardo C. Storti and Todd J. Desiato, Physics Essays, Vol. 19 No. 4 December 2006

save

You are on page 1of 12

)

Practical modelling methods of the polarizable vacuum - IV

Riccardo C. Storti1, Todd J. Desiato

Abstract

An experimental prediction is developed considering gravitational acceleration “g” as a purely

mathematical function. This expands potential experimental avenues in relation to the hypothesis to be

tested presented in “Practical modelling methods of the polarizable vacuum I-III”. Subsequently, the

construct herein presents the following:

i. A pseudo-electromagnetic, pseudo-propagating transverse plane wave harmonic

representation of gravitational fields at a mathematical point, arising from geometrically

spherical objects, using modified Complex Fourier Series.

ii. Characteristics of the Amplitude Spectrum based on (i).

iii. Derivation of the fundamental harmonic frequency based on (i).

iv. Characteristics of the frequency spectrum of an implied Zero-Point-Field (ZPF) based on (i)

and the assumption that an electromagnetic (EM) relationship exists over a change in

displacement across a practical benchtop test volume.

1

rstorti@deltagroupengineering.com, tdesiato@deltagroupengineering.com.

1

1 ITRODUCTIO

1.1 GENERAL [1-3]

**A metric engineering description was presented in [3] based on the principles of similarity and
**

an engineering parameter, termed the critical ratio “KR”, has been formulated to indicate proportional

experimental conditions. “KR” may be stated as the ratio of the applied electromagnetic (EM) fields to

the induced change of gravitational field, in terms of energy densities.

1.2 HARMONICS

**To further articulate the applicability of “KR”, a purely harmonic non-EM description of
**

gravitational fields is developed. This acts to expand potential experimental avenues in relation to the

hypothesis to be tested as stated in [2]. Subsequently, the construct herein presents the following,

i. A pseudo-EM, pseudo-propagating transverse plane wave harmonic representation of

gravitational fields at a mathematical point, arising from geometrically spherical objects of

uniform mass distribution, using modified Complex Fourier Series.

ii. Characteristics of the Amplitude Spectrum based on (i).

iii. Derivation of the fundamental harmonic frequency based on (i).

iv. Characteristics of the frequency spectrum of an implied Zero-Point-Field (ZPF) based on (i) and

the assumption that an EM relationship exists over a change in displacement across a practical

benchtop test volume.

The proceeding construct obeys the following hierarchy,

v. A pseudo-EM, pseudo-propagating transverse plane wave harmonic representation of the

magnitude of gravitational acceleration “g” is developed in section 3.1.

vi. The frequency spectrum of (v) is derived in section 3.2 by application of Buckingham Π Theory

(BPT) and dimensional similarity developed in [1].

vii. The ZPF energy density is related to (vi) in section 3.3 based on the assumption that engineered

EM changes in “g” may be produced across the dimensions of a practical benchtop test volume.

viii. Spectral characteristics of the Polarizable Vacuum (PV) are derived in section 3.4 based on (vii).

ix. A description of physical modelling criteria is presented in section 4.

x. A set of sample calculations and illustrational plots are presented in section 5.

1.3 EXPERIMENTATION

**The method of solution contained herein facilitates the determination of the following PV / ZPF
**

experimental design boundaries at practical benchtop conditions,

i. Amplitude and frequency spectrums.

ii. Poynting Vectors.

iii. Coupling frequencies.

2 THEORETICAL MODELLIG

2.1 TIME DOMAIN

**Fourier series may be applied to represent a periodic function as an infinite trigonometric
**

series in sine and cosine terms. It may also be applied to represent a constant function over an arbitrary

period by the infinite summation of sinusoids.

Since the PV model is a weak field isomorphic approximation of General Relativity (GR) and

the frequency spectrum is postulated to range from -∞ < ω < ∞, it follows that Fourier Series may

present a useful tool by which to describe gravity as the number of harmonic frequency modes tends to

infinity.

2.2 DISPLACMENT DOMAIN

**The time domain modelling in the proceeding section may be applied over the displacement
**

domain of a practical benchtop test volume by considering the relevant changes over the dimensions of

that volume. This is illustrated by sample calculations presented in section 5.

2

3 MATHEMATICAL MODELLIG2

3.1 CONSTANT ACCELERATION

**Constant functions may be expressed as a summation of trigonometric terms. Subsequently, it
**

is convenient to model a gravitational field utilizing modified Complex Fourier Series, according to the

harmonic distribution “nPV = -N, 2 - N ... N”, where “N” is an odd number harmonic. Hence, the

magnitude of the gravitational acceleration vector “g” may be usefully represented by equation (1) as3

|nPV| → ∞,

G. M . 2 . i . π .n PV .ω PV( 1 , r , M ) .t .i

g( r , M ) e

r

2 π . n PV

n PV

(1)

Where, the wavefunction amplitude spectrum “CPV” is calculated to be,

G. M . 2

C PV n PV, r , M

r

2 π . n PV

(2)

Such that,

Variable Description Units

ωPV(nPV,r,M) Field harmonic of PV Hz

ωPV(1,r,M) Fundamental field harmonic of PV Hz

nPV Harmonic frequency modes of PV None

r Magnitude of position vector relative to the centre m

of mass

M Mass kg

G Gravitational constant m3kg-1s-2

Table 1,

3.2 FREQUENCY SPECTRUM

**It was illustrated in [1] that dimensional similarity and the equivalence principle could be
**

applied to represent the magnitude of an acceleration vector “aPV” as follows,

3 2

ω PV . r

a PV K 0 ω PV, r , E, B, X .

c (3)

Where,

Variable Description Units

K0(ωPV,r,E,B,X) Experimental relationship function4 None

ωPV Harmonic frequency modes of PV Hz

E Magnitude of PV electric field vector V/m

B Magnitude of PV magnetic field vector T

c Velocity of light in a vacuum m/s

Table 2,

2

All mathematical modelling and output was formed using “MathCad 8 Professional” and appears in

standard product notation.

3

Equation (1) represents the magnitude of a periodic square wave solution with constant amplitude.

4

“X” denotes all variables, within the experimental environment, that influences experimental results

and behaviour. This also includes all parameters that might otherwise be neglected, due to practical

calculation limitations, in theoretical analysis.

3

In accordance with the harmonic representation of “g” illustrated by equation (1),

“K0(ωPV,r,E,B,X)” is a frequency dependent experimental function. It was illustrated in [1] that

K0(ωPV,r,E,B,X) = K0(X) = KPV-3/2. Hence, an expression for the frequency spectrum may be derived in

terms of harmonic mode. This may be achieved by assuming the acceleration described by equation (3)

is dynamically, kinematically and geometrically similar to the amplitude of the 1st harmonic (|nPV| = 1)

as described by equation (2) as follows,

aPV ≡ CPV(1,r,M) (4)

Therefore, utilising equation (3) and (4), it follows that all frequency modes may be represented by,

G .M

n PV 3. . . r .c

2

ω PV n PV, r , M . 2 c G M .e

r π .r (5)

Hence, the fundamental frequency (|nPV| = 1) as a function of planetary radial displacement

may be graphically represented for the Earth as follows,

RE

Fundamental Frequency

ω PV 1 , r , M E

ω PV 1 , R E , M E

r

Radial Distance

Figure 1,

Where,

Variable Description Units

RE Radius of the Earth m

ME Mass of the Earth kg

Table 3,

3.3 ENERGY DENSITY

**The gravitational field surrounding a homogeneous solid spherical mass may be characterised
**

by its energy density. Assuming that the magnitude of this field is directly proportional to the mass-

energy density of the object, then the energy density “Uω” may be evaluated over the difference

between successive odd frequency modes as follows,

U ω ( r, M ) .

4 4

U ω n PV, r , M n PV 2 n PV

(6)

Where,

h . 4

U ω ( r, M ) ω PV( 1 , r , M )

2.c

3

(7)

Variable Description Units

Uω(nPV,r,M) Energy density per change in odd harmonic mode Pa

h Planck’s Constant Js

Table 4,

4

3.4 SPECTRAL CHARACTERISTICS

3.4.1 CUT-OFF MODE AND FREQUENCY

**Utilizing the approximate rest mass-energy density “Um” of a solid spherical object, as
**

described by equation (8), an expression relating the terminating harmonic frequency mode to “r” and

“M” may be derived as follows,

3.M .c

2

U m( r , M )

4.π .r

3

(8)

Assuming that |Um(r,M)| = |Uω(nPV,r,M)|, equation (8) may be related to equation (6) and solved for

“|nPV|”. This is termed the harmonic cut-off mode “nΩ” as follows,

Ω ( r, M ) 4

n Ω ( r, M ) 1

12 Ω ( r, M ) (9)

Where, “Ω(r,M)” is termed the harmonic cut-off function,

3

2

U m( r , M ) U m( r , M )

Ω ( r, M ) 108. 12. 768 81.

U ω ( r, M ) U ω ( r, M )

(10)

Subsequently, the upper boundary of the ZPF frequency spectrum “ωΩ”, termed the harmonic

cut-off frequency, may be calculated as follows,

ω Ω ( r , M ) n Ω ( r , M ) .ω PV( 1 , r , M )

(11)

The derivation of equations (9-11) is based on the compression of the energy density to one

change in odd harmonic mode whilst preserving dynamic, kinematic and geometric similarity in

accordance with BPT. The subsequent application of these results to equation (1) acts to decompress

the energy density over the Fourier domain yielding a highly precise reciprocal harmonic

representation of “g”. Hence, “nΩ” and “ωΩ” may be graphically represented for the Earth as follows,

RE

n Ω R E, M E

n Ω r, M E

ω Ω r, M E

ω Ω R E, M E

r

Radial Distance

Cutoff Mode

Cutoff Frequency

Figure 2,

3.4.2 ZERO-POINT-FIELD

**The cross-fertilisation of the amplitude and frequency characteristics of the Fourier spectrum
**

with the ZPF spectral energy density distribution is a useful tool by which to analyse expected

Experimental Prototype (EP) characteristics. This may be achieved by graphing the ZPF Poynting

Vector “Sω” as follows,

S ω n PV, r , M c .U ω n PV, r , M

(12)

5

ZPF Poynting Vector

S ω n PV , R E , M E

n PV

Harmonic

Figure 3,

4 PHYSICAL MODELLIG

4.1 POLARIZABLE VACUUM

**The spectral characteristics of an EP may be articulated for a spherical test object with
**

uniform mass distribution at the surface of the Earth assuming,

i. The ZPF physically exists as a spectrum of frequencies and wave vectors.

ii. The sum of all ZPF wave vectors at the surface of the Earth is coplanar with the gravitational

acceleration vector. This represents the only vector of practical experimental consequence.

iii. A modified Complex Fourier Series representation of “g” is physically real and is representative

of the magnitude of the resultant ZPF wave vector.

iv. A physical relationship exists between electricity, magnetism and gravity such that the physical

interaction of the test object with the PV may be investigated and potentially modified utilizing

the equations defined in the preceding section.

4.2 TEST VOLUMES

**The application of modified Fourier Series to define the modes of oscillation of physical
**

systems has been experimentally verified since its development by Joseph Fourier (1768-1830). [4] The

representation developed in the preceding section is defined in the time domain but may also be applied

over an arbitrary displacement domain “∆r” as appears in standard engineering texts for beams,

membranes, strings, control systems and wave equations. [5,6]

If we consider a small5 cubic test volume of length “∆r” to be filled with a large number of

incremental displacement elements, frequency characteristics of the test volume may be hypothesised.

Assuming each element within the test volume may be described by sinusoids of appropriate amplitude

and frequency, it may be conjectured that the system interaction of the elements produces an amplitude

and frequency spectrum consistent with a modified Fourier Series representation of “g” over “∆r”.

The resultant wave vector at each frequency mode of the test volume is required to be

coplanar with the gravitational acceleration vector for it to be representative of physical reality. Hence,

only a line of action vertically downward through the cubic element is required for experimental

consideration. Moreover, the mathematical representation of forces acting through the test volume is

further simplified by approximating “g” as constant over the vertical dimension of the test volume.

4.3 TEST OBJECT

**In accordance with PV / ZPF theory, test objects are assumed to produce a gravitational
**

spectral signature6 in the same manner as the signature produced by the planetary masses. It is also

assumed that the gravitational forces experienced by objects arise from its spectrum coupling to the

background field.

5

Refers to an experimentally practical benchtop volume.

6

Gravitational spectral signature is defined as the spectrum of amplitudes and frequencies unique to “r”

and “M” by the application of modified Fourier series.

6

5 SAMPLE CALCULATIOS

5.1 BACKGROUND GRAVITATIONAL FIELD

5.1.1 FUNDAMENTAL FREQUENCY

**The fundamental frequency mode of the PV at the surface of the Earth may be usefully
**

approximated as follows,

ωPV(1,RE,ME) ≈ 0.04 (Hz) (13)

5.1.2 MODE BANDWIDTH

**An expression may be defined representing the mode bandwidth of the local gravitational field
**

as follows,

∆ω PV( r , M ) ω Ω ( r , M ) ω PV( 1 , r , M )

(14)

Assuming an ideal relationship between the mathematical model and the background gravitational field

yields7,

∆ωPV(RE,ME) ≈ 520 (YHz) (15)

5.2 APPLIED EXPERIMENTAL FIELDS

5.2.1 MODE BANDWIDTH

**Assuming a cubic element of length “∆r” possesses spectral attributes over the displacement
**

domain, the permissible modes “Ν∆r” starting from “ωΩ” at “r” over “∆r” as |nPV| → nΩ may be

approximated by,

∆r

N ∆r( r , M ) ω Ω ( r , M ) .

c (16)

In figure (4),

1. The arrows pointing downwards represent a uniform gravitational field.

2. The arrows pointing upwards represent a uniformly applied system field.

3. The cube represents the experimental test volume of length “∆r”, with base residing at co-ordinates

(0,0,r).

4. The square section represents an EM flux area.

5. “h” represents the vertical displacement above the EM flux area.

∆r

h

-X Y

-Y X

Figure 4,

7

YHz = 1024 (Hz).

7

5.2.2 ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS

**The factors to be considered in experimental design configurations are as follows:
**

1. Where possible, the experimental should attempt to maximise the applied energy density with

preference towards the highest frequency bombardment possible.

2. Optimal energy delivery conditions occur at the highest achievable frequencies tending

towards the harmonic cut-off mode “nΩ”.

3. Optimal experimental conditions occur when the ratio of the applied Poynting Vector to the

Impedance Function approaches unity. [3]

4. EM modes within the test volume are subject to normal physical influences. For example, the

fundamental frequency mode cannot exist within a typical Casimir experiment; hence the

equivalent gravitational acceleration harmonic cannot exist. The relative contribution of low

harmonic mode numbers to “g” is trivial.

6 COCLUSIOS

**The construct herein suggests that the delivery of EM radiation to a solid spherical test object
**

may be used to alter the weight of the object. If the test object is bombarded by EM radiation, at high

energy density and frequency, the gravitational spectral signature of the test object may undergo

constructive or destructive interference.

References

**[1] R. C. Storti, T. J. Desiato, “Electro-Gravi-Magnetics (EGM) - Practical modelling methods of the
**

polarizable vacuum – I”, http://www.deltagroupengineering.com/Docs/EGM_1.pdf

[2] R. C. Storti, T. J. Desiato, “Electro-Gravi-Magnetics (EGM) - Practical modelling methods of the

polarizable vacuum – II”, http://www.deltagroupengineering.com/Docs/EGM_2.pdf

[3] R. C. Storti, T. J. Desiato, “Electro-Gravi-Magnetics (EGM) - Practical modelling methods of the

polarizable vacuum – III”, http://www.deltagroupengineering.com/Docs/EGM_3.pdf

[4] Lennart Rade, Bertil Westergren, “Beta Mathematics Handbook Second Edition”, Chartwell-Bratt

Ltd, 1990, Page 470.

[5] K.A. Stroud, “Further Engineering Mathematics”, MacMillan Education LTD, Camelot Press

LTD, 1986, Programme 17.

[6] Erwin Kreyszig, “Advanced Engineering Mathematics Seventh Edition”, John Wiley & Sons Inc.,

1993, Ch 10 and 11.

8

APPEDIX A

FORMULATIOS, DERIVATIOS, CHARACTERISTICS AD PROOFS

Integrating the Spectral Energy Density equation stated in [2],

2 .h .ω

3

ρ 0( ω )

3

c (A.1)

Yields,

2 .h . 3 1. h . 4

ω dω ω

c

3 2 c3

(A.2)

**where, “ω ≡ ωPV”: utilising equation (5),
**

n PV 3 2 .c .G.M

ω PV . . K

PV

r π .r (5)

**Yields a generalised frequency change representation according to,
**

h . 4 4

Uω ωPV 2

ωPV

2 .c

3

(A.3)

Substituting equation (5) into (A.2) yields the generalised change in odd mode representation according to,

U ω( r , M ) .

4 4

U ω n PV, r , M n PV 2 n PV

(6)

where,

h .G.M . 2 .c .G.M .

3

2

U ω( r , M ) K PV

πr.

π .c .r

2 5

(A.4)

#ote: Equation (A.4) is a modified representation of equation (7).

Subsequently, if:

9

3 .M .c

2

U m( r , M )

4 .π .r

3

(8)

And assuming: U m( r , M ) U ω n PV, r , M then,

U ω( r , M ) .

4 4

U m( r , M ) n PV 2 n PV

(A.5)

Next, let:

U m( r , M )

D

U ω( r , M ) (A.6)

Hence,

4 4

D n PV 2 n PV

(A.7)

Solving for “nPV” yields,

10

2 1

3 3

1 1

2 2

1 . 108.D 12. 768 81.D 48 12. 108.D 12. 768 81.D

2 2

12 1

3

1

2

108.D 12. 768 81.D

2

2 1 2

3 3 3

1 1 1

2 2 2

108.D 12. 768 81.D 48 24. 108.D 12. 768 81.D i . 3 . 108.D 12. 768 81.D 48.i . 3

2 2 2

4 4 1.

D n PV 2 n PV solve , n PV, factor

24 1

3

1

2

108.D 12. 768 81.D

2

2 1 2

3 3 3

1 1 1

2 2 2

1 . 108.D 12. 768 81.D 48 24. 108.D 12. 768 81.D i . 3 . 108.D 12. 768 81.D 48.i . 3

2 2 2

24 1

3

1

2

108.D 12. 768 81.D

2

(Eq. A.8)

Analysing the structure of the preceding equation leads to simplification by assigning temporary definitions of “F” and “L” for use with equation (A.8). This approach is required to

fully exploit the “MathCad 8 Professional” symbolic calculation environment and may be articulated as follows,

Let: “F = 108D+12√(768+81D2)” and “F = L3”. Hence, an expression for “nPV” as a function of “L” may be defined by,

1. 4

solve , n PV, factor L 1

12 L

**4 4 substitute , 108.D 12. 768 81.D F
**

2 1. . 1 . 2 .i . 3 2

D n PV 2 n PV i 3 L 1

2 24 24 L

3 1 1 3 2

substitute , F L, ,F L 1. . 1 . 2 .i . 3 2

3

F L i 3 L 1

24 24 L

collect , L (A.9)

11

Equation (A.9) is a simplifying intermediary step leading to the harmonic cut-off function “Ω(r,Μ)” subject to the redefinition of “L” as follows,

**Let: “L = Ω(r,M)” and “nΩ(r,M) = nPV + 2” hence,
**

Ω ( r, M ) 4

n Ω ( r , M ) n PV 2 1 2

12 Ω ( r, M ) (A.10)

Therefore,

Ω ( r, M ) 4

n Ω ( r, M ) 1

12 Ω ( r, M ) (9)

Performing the appropriate substitutions of “D” into “L3 = 108D+12√(768+81D2)” for application to equation (9) yields,

3

2

U m( r , M ) U m( r , M )

Ω ( r, M ) 108. 12. 768 81.

U ω( r , M ) U ω( r , M ) (10)

Hence,

ω Ω ( r , M ) n Ω ( r , M ) .ω PV( 1 , r , M )

(11)

12

- Chemometrics for Raman SpectroscopyUploaded byRichard Alexander
- Base Excited SystemsUploaded byandyhr
- 2 Classical Theory Crystal VibrationsUploaded byCazimir Bostan
- Impact EchoUploaded byLakeisha Ramos
- A e 33166173Uploaded byAnonymous 7VPPkWS8O
- ArticleUploaded byget2cs
- g9HelpUploaded byFlorin-Catalin Grec
- Analysis of the Response of a Cracked JeffcottUploaded byJoel Morales Perez
- Aacton20080723 ClusteringUploaded byduytruongcotin
- XI Phy Ch14 Waves ChapterNotesUploaded byRohit Goel
- Vibrations of a DrumUploaded byCrazybiologist245
- SPECOM1999gotoUploaded byfifster
- Forced Vibration KaranUploaded bypavanoena
- Probabilistic Responses of Base Isolated Structures to El Centro 1940 and Mexico City 1985 Earthquakes 1992Uploaded bycisco
- Stabilizzatore NaviUploaded bySarah Robinson
- tmpB5CD.tmpUploaded byFrontiers
- Seismic Requirement of Power TransformerUploaded byPrashant Puri
- Seismic Freq ShiftUploaded byCaballoOscuro26
- elasticityUploaded byapi-261449943
- Detailed GuidelinesUploaded byHanish Sharma
- 14_02-0059Uploaded byNirav Acharya
- 23. Chapter 23 - Transient Analyses _a4Uploaded byGabrielPaintings
- vibration of aircraftUploaded byArun Nair
- Earthquake engineeringUploaded byMontoya Luis
- Prob01 n4w Modal PlateUploaded bySameera Srivathsa
- tandın aeeeUploaded byEmir Avcıoğlu
- tmpA9D.tmpUploaded byFrontiers
- Wigner Ville DistributionUploaded byMar Mac
- UW Lecture2to4 Reading2.DengUploaded bySandeep Reddy Kankanala
- emtUploaded bysuresh

- SPIE 2011Uploaded bydgE
- The Natural Philosophy of the Cosmos (C)Uploaded bydgE
- Derivation of ElectroMagnetic RadiiUploaded bydgE
- The Natural Philosophy of the Cosmos (A)Uploaded bydgE
- Polarizable Vacuum (PV) and the Schwarzschild SolutionUploaded bydgE
- The Natural Philosophy of the Cosmos (Graphs) (C)Uploaded bydgE
- Polarizable Vacuum (PV) and the Reissner-Nordstrom SolutionUploaded bydgE
- Electro-Gravi-Magnetics (EGM); Practical modelling methods of the polarizable vacuum - VIIUploaded bydgE
- The Natural Philosophy of Fundamental ParticlesUploaded bydgE
- Derivation of Fundamental Particle Radii: Electron, Proton & NeutronUploaded bydgE
- Derivation of the Photon & Graviton Mass-Energies & RadiiUploaded bydgE
- Derivation of the Photon Mass-Energy ThresholdUploaded bydgE
- The Extraterrestrial Casimir EffectUploaded bydgE
- The Natural Philosophy of the Cosmos (B)Uploaded bydgE
- Electro-Gravi-Magnetics (EGM); Practical modelling methods of the polarizable vacuum - VIUploaded bydgE
- Particle Physics & Cosmology PostersUploaded bydgE
- Quinta Essentia - Part 2Uploaded bydgE
- Electro-Gravi-Magnetics (EGM); Practical modelling methods of the polarizable vacuum - IUploaded bydgE
- Electro-Gravi-Magnetics (EGM); Practical modelling methods of the polarizable vacuum - IIUploaded bydgE
- SPIE 2007Uploaded bydgE
- SPIE 2005Uploaded bydgE
- Quinta Essentia - Part 1Uploaded bydgE
- EGM Electro-Gravi-Magnetics (EGM); Practical modelling methods of the polarizable vacuum - VUploaded bydgE
- Quinta Essentia - Part 4Uploaded bydgE
- Electro-Gravi-Magnetics (EGM); Practical modelling methods of the polarizable vacuum - IIIUploaded bydgE
- Quinta Essentia - Part 3Uploaded bydgE
- SPIE 2009Uploaded bydgE

- Maestro HAS - 2014.docxUploaded byMiguel Minchola
- dicas moto g2.pdfUploaded byLucas Borges
- ASTM_Tables (1).xlsUploaded byAbhishek Pandey
- Maths Rubrics K-6Uploaded byernsteins
- PFC Ana BamondeUploaded bypaul
- Descent. Resumen HeroeUploaded byJuanmhr
- Sistema Financiero ResumenUploaded byJose Luis Vargas
- Lenda da Noiva de Arraiolos_9ºEUploaded byLena Barreto
- Final a Project Report on Lijjat PaadUploaded bysshreyas
- 3 años R.D. N° 001-2018-EF.63.01 Vigencia de estudiosUploaded byJessie Aviles
- Contrato de ArrendamientoUploaded byJose Luis Alarcon
- Auto de las medidas cautelares en el caso NoosUploaded byPúblico.es
- MonografiaUploaded byHélioIcaro
- In Co Terms 2010Uploaded bySergio O. Chong Lugo
- Os Segredos Do Livro EternoUploaded byTuninho Do Rock
- Javier VELASCO-ARIAS (ed.), La Biblia Compartida. Biblia y Pastoral (Conocer la Biblia 4), Madrid: San Pablo 2012Uploaded byJavier Velasco Arias
- NBR 14611 - Desenho Técnico - Representação Simplificada Em Estruturas MetalicasUploaded byPedro Mendes
- Database Connections With OOP, PHP and MySQLUploaded byamaniel
- Chapter 1 Derivatives an IntroductionUploaded bygovindpatel1990
- Aspectos Judiciale de La CanUploaded byWilson Vasquez
- CICLO CONFERENCIAS 2011 - SOBRECARGA TOXICA Y ARMONIA VITALUploaded byEl Granero Integral
- Sanidad Interior iUploaded byGerardo Sepulveda
- Mt San Jose Las PiñasUploaded byJohnny Quiroga
- Sintesis 3 Tipos de Audioria InformaticaUploaded byViri Suchiapa
- Cruz Del MaestroUploaded byMario Barahona
- Em Torno Dos Problemas Do LeninismoUploaded byVitor Carvalho
- dieabetes mellitus tipo 1 y 2.pptUploaded byAlexander Nieves Tomayconza
- ElegíaUploaded byMaga Fernandez Leone
- Arduino - ArduinoDueUploaded byAlan Contreras
- 1. El Inconsciente Es El Discurso Del OtroUploaded byJhonatan Rada Reyes