This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
Poliq, Vol. 2, No. I, pp. 4349, 1995 Copyright 0 1995 Elsevier Science Ltd Printed in Great Britain. All rights reserved 0967-070X/95 $ IO.00 + 0.00
From ‘predict and provide’ to ‘predict and prevent’?: pricing and planning in transport policy
Unilversity of Cambridge, Department @Geography, Cambridge CB2 3EN, UK
Transport policy in Britain is under the influence of a ‘new realism’. This paper explores policy instruments which are central to the new approach - ‘getting the price right’ and influencing travel patterns through land use planning. It suggests that the concept of the ‘right’ price is problematic, that land use measures are necessary but not sufficient and that neither pricing nor planning policies are likely, in isolation, to have sufficient effect across the range of environmental impacts of transport. A sustainable transport policy means maximising accessibility within environmental constraints and must be achieved by means of a co-ordinated policy package.
Keywords: pricing, planning, sustainability
UK transport policy in the mid-1990s presents a paradox. On the one hand there is a pervasive sense of crisis, fluidity and change - what Goodwin er al. (1991) have called the ‘new realism’. On the other hand there is a feeling, amounting sometimes to resignation, that underlying rigidities, ideologies and interests will make it difficult, if not impossible, to move from where we are now to a more sustainable transport future. The Government’s Strategy for Sustainable Development (Secretary of State for the Environment et al., 1994), looking forward nearly 20 years to the year 2012, identifies transport as a major challenge. This concern is strongly reiterated in the eighteenth report of the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (1994) which, in its call for radical reorientation of prevailing policies, is both a manifestation and a powerful reinforcement of the new realism. This paper explores three possible approaches to transport policy which might take us towards a more environmentally sustainable future: in doing so it raises questions about certain aspects of the new realism particularly those concerned with pricing and land use policies which are themselves rapidly becoming basic tenets of conventional wisdom. Before outlining these approaches, it is salutary to look back over the past 20 years. In the mid 1970s environment and especially resource issues were prominent in the aftermath of the first environmental revolution and the 1973/4 oil crisis. Though many of the predictions made during the 1960s and 1970s (of rapidly escalating oil prices, for example) have proved false, Buchanan’s (1963) warning
that ‘deliberate limitation of the volume of motor traffic in our cities’ would be ‘quite unavoidable’ was prescient. Since then, road traffic in Britain has increased by more than two and a half times, and such trends have been singled out as a major environmental threat. The three routes to the future explored in this paper for brevity, ‘Predict and Provide’, ‘The Price is Right’ and ‘The Planning Panacea’ - are neither mutually exclusive nor exhaustive of all possible policy approaches. But all are influential and much debated. The familiar ‘predict and provide’ strategy has been severely criticised. It is included here not only as a benchmark, but because the philosophy of provision to accommodate demand, though modified at the margin, is still a powerful force in transport policy. Nevertheless, an important element of the ‘new realism’ is the acknowledgement that trends can be influenced as well as predicted. The other two approaches involve different means of exerting such influence. The second - getting the price ‘right’ - has rapidly gained ground in the rhetoric of transport policy and is beginning to have an impact in practice. The third - the pursuit of land use policies which promote sustainable travel patterns has risen recently to prominence from a position of relative obscurity. Pricing and land use planning are not of course the only alternatives to the ‘predict and provide’ approach; but each has recently been the subject of renewed attention, and each is widely acknowledged to be a significant component of a sustainable transport policy (Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, 1994).
the vision of the future as a continuation of current trends. Secretary of State for the Environment et al. emphasis added).. for example in vehicle emissions or fuel efficiency. Owens. that impact reductions through technical fixes are likely to be outweighed by traffic growth and by factors such as a preference for larger and more powerful cars (Martin and Shock. transport has reached that point of controversy where local and generic issues reinforce each other in a powerful challenge to the foundations of policy as well as resistance to its implementation: energy policy experienced a similar upheaval during the 1980s (Peake and Hope. this philosophy has underpinned the process of traffic forecasting and has provided its main rationale. 1981. The assertion that ‘there is no option but to build more roads unless we change our aspirations’ (Parkinson. . 1994. 1994).Prediction. landscape and habitat congestion. contribute to the sense that the predict and provide strategy has become untenable. the opposition spans a broad political spectrum. and the degree of mutability of the trends on which it seems to be based. These three approaches. Its proposal to reduce emissions from surface transport to no more than 80% of their 1990 levels by 2020 will. for example. emphasis added) is typical of the way in which this view has been promoted in ministerial statements. it seems. Media images of a Britain covered by superhighways (for example. Traffic projections and the roads programme have become a focus for this discontent. In the absence of other policies. illustrate a number of important emergent themes in the development of a sustainable transport policy. these are reminiscent of alarming maps of planned nuclear installations in the 1980s. 1990. Indications of crisis include mounting criticism of policy from diverse groups. for commuting) as a classic case of a many-person prisoner’s dilemma: in such circumstances. see Adams. . Birmingham City Council. 1993) which will still not solve the problem of congestion. 2Again. social impacts. The focus here is on the acceptability of the ‘predict and provide’ approach. . 1994). with which politicians interfere at their peril. Parfit (1984) cites travel decisions (in this case. allowance must be made for various technical changes. we have a situation where both current trends and the policies needed to change them are politically unacceptable. in the UK’s Strategy for-Climate Change. 1985). pr-icitq and plannincg: S Owens The underlying assumptions of each approach and the likely efficacy of policies are important issues for debate. emissions’ (Secretary of State for the Environment et al. reflected in the existence of more than 200 protest groups opposing new road schemes in the UK (Ghazi. p 15 1) assert more categorically that ‘the major trends . 1992. arguing that whatever the merits of policy options. even mitigated by pollution abatement and other palliative measures. Vidal. 1978). personal communication.’ Significantly. Specifically. 1991. because ‘Robin Grove-White used this phrase in the context of energy policy in the 198Os. in a democracy they have to be ‘digestible’ (Grove-White. Trend projection and its implications have been extensively analysed elsewhere. however. 1989. 1992. An equally important point is that pollution is only one (albeit highly significant) way in which transport damages the environment and the quality of life. therefore. In transport. in the light of forecast traffic growth. Gossop and Webb (1993. Transnet. require ‘radical measures’ (p 44). and it is not the purpose of this paper to consider yet again official forecasts of vehicle ownership and traffic and their likely social. complaints about noise and dissatisfaction with the extent to which traffic dominates townscapes and people’s daily lives (for example. One explanation lies in the very nature of transport trends as the aggregate of a myriad of individual decisions. either already required by legislation or likely to be achieved within the relevant time horizon. the questions which it raises about freedom of choice. 1990). In projecting environmental impacts. Ghazi. growing concern about the links between traffic pollution and health. 1993 and Vidal. . Given this apparently widespread dissatisfaction.. Transnet. In short. are so powerful that policies that aim to reverse them are doomed to failure’. Furthermore. Tyme. equated with need and met by infrastructure provision at least in as far as the public purse will allow. 1993. Many commentators agree. RAC Foundation. land use and the environment. as the Royal Commission (1994. ‘[tlhere has been a convergence towards a recognition that current trends are not sustainable’. it is acknowledged that ‘strong [traffic] growth trends will continue to put pressure on the ability of the UK to curb levels of CO. since it sometimes seems that transport has inherited from nuclear power a prime position in the demonology of the environmental movement. 1994. while necessarily selective. So. Predict and provide The philosophy which has dominated transport policy has been one in which demands are projected. though the implications of these strategies are considered in turn. The Royal Commission (1994) is more forthright: it believes that ‘a substantial t-eduction in emissions from the transport sector is an essential element if stabilisation of carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere is to be achieved in the longer term’ (p 44. 44 For these reasons. 1994). degradation and the sheer tyranny of traffic in many urban and rural areas will remain largely unaffected even if individual vehicles become cleaner and more efficient. currently determining patterns of urban change . 1994. p 4) points out. 1991. the extent to which pricing and planning policies are mutually interdependent is itself a consideration for research and policy. Banister and Button. 1990. Goodwin. it seems paradoxical that trends are often represented as an expression of freedom of choice. Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution. . p 111) claim that ‘effective policies to restrain road traffic growth may prove electorally unpopular’ and Breheny and Rookwood (1993. p 69).’ While the critique of policy is not new. economic and environmental impacts (for full discussion. has become ‘indigestible’. but a sense of immutability also permeates the literature on transport. The analogy is pertinent.
1988). to observe a discernible shift from deployment of the ‘freedom of choice’ argument in defence of individual mobility to a new rhetoric of choice across all transport modes. our rational choices as consumers do not produce the outcome we would choose as citizens (Sagoff. very much open to question. travel patterns are a poor advertisement for the invisible hand of the market: perceptions of even the internal costs of travel are 1982. for an overview. The need to protect ‘critical natural capital’. we may wish to withdraw some aspects of the environment from the arena of trade off (Owens. the issues are far from resolved (for different perspectives see Bowers. Sagoff. quantify and evaluate (see. Most fundamentally. Economic analysis tells us that environmental costs could be intemalised by setting a tax on pollution (or whatever) equal to the marginal damage cost at the socially optimum level of pollution: this is the level at which the costs imposed by the next unit of pollution are equal to the costs of its abatement. or consume sites of great natural or cultural significance. obligations to future generations or respect for the intrinsic value of nature. The challenging objectives that it sets ‘stem from a recognition that the present and prospective use of transport is creating environmental damage which is in the long term unacceptable’ (p 106). Jacobs. for example. environmental targets and economic instruments. however. cycling and walking as well as roads so we can provide people with more choice’ (Everitt. investment criteria for infrastructure. What remains to be seen is whether the underlying premises of transport policy will be demolished. Increasing transport costs is thus represented as a way of achieving the ‘optimum’ level of pollution: this logic lies behind the notion that the benefits of transport should be weighed against its ‘full’ social costs. even for those mobile enough to enjoy it. The Royal Commission (1994.is considered in the following section. 1988).getting the price ‘right’ . 1992 para 95) refers to the ‘true costs’ of transport and the necessity of ‘intemalising external costs’. 1993.. and environmentalists have consistently argued that transport is underpriced in this respect. those aspects of the environment considered non-substitutable and effectively deemed inviolable. however. Sagoff. Pearce et al. The concept of intemalising the latter implies the prior determination of the ‘true value’ of the environment and its subsequent weighing against the benefits of transport in the formulation of policy objectives. There are a number of problems. This approach . Cropper and Oates. 1994). the UK Government wants to ‘ensure that users pay the full social and environmental costs of their transport decisions’ (Secretary of State for the Environment et al. pricing and planning: S Owens costs are extemalised and we act in ignorance of what others will do. One. or whether they will survive with the policy modified only to take account of physical and political impossibilities. But to use pricing as a means to politically chosen ends is not the same as determining what the environment is ‘worth’ in order to decide what those ends ought to be. such as provision of company cars. risk. individuals exercising choice constrain their own future choices. Price. advocating ‘a policy that covers public transport. and it is increasingly apparent that in transport. p 102) acknowledges that ‘putting money values on irreversible loss of habitat. through fiscal measures. It is important to recognise that ‘choice’. On this reasoning whatever the current benefits of a transport system which might cause irreversible damage to the atmosphere. It is interesting. 1992. There can be little doubt that the established approach to transport policy in Britain is under sustained attack. Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution. This important distinction is accepted explicitly by the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (1994) in its treatment of the relationship between cost-benefit analysis. for example. 1994). recognise. notoriously inaccurate (Dix and Goodwin. Kelman. sometimes impossible. 1992. and one widely accepted means of achieving this is to attempt. Some modification at least seems inevitable. to intemalise some of the social and environmental costs of transport. widely acknowledged. whether this emanates from official sources or from their most vigorous critics. Similar language permeates the Government’s sustainability strategy and other recent transport statements. 1989. The price is right The notion that transport users should pay their ‘full social costs’ now permeates the discourse on transport policy. Jacobs. forthcoming. 1994). to anticipate. 1978). Whether any increase will ‘cover’ external costs is. and certain locational trends are clearly attributable to policy. and some of the forces influencing behaviour. For other reasons too. We now find the Assistant Director of the British Roads Federation. After extensive debate about the methodology and underlying philosophy of evaluation. 1994). it would be wrong to pursue it. the Commission accepts that economic instru45 . is influenced in many visible and less visible ways. To recognise these problems is not to deny a role for the price mechanism: it clearly has potential as a policy instrument. degradation of landscape or destruction of cultural assets may be objectionable on grounds of principle as well as practicality’ and others have argued that for reasons of uncertainty. the choices of others and the choices of future generations. therefore. 1993.Prediction. is that environmental costs are typically difficult. quoted in Ghazi 1994). cost-benefit analysis is considered by some critics to be an inappropriate framework for the formulation of policies with profound environmental implications (see. Kelman. 1990. Metcalf. implies that a sustainable transport policy would involve environmental capacity constraints (Hatton.. The European Commission (CEC. To the long-standing critique of other groups has now been added the influential voice of the scientific establishment in the form of the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (1994). 1988). 1990. While the targets ‘are not defined in terms of costs and benefits’.
Interestingly. pricing und planning: S Owens ments ‘should make it possible to minimise the cost to the community of achieving a particular target’ (p 106). It seems unlikely that those concerned with the environmental costs of transport would accept that they had thereby been ‘intemalised’. and/or the impacts of traffic and roads on many aspects of social life and the environment need to be dealt with by additional policy instruments.’ The effects of these price increases on carbon dioxide and other emissions are not insignificant. empirical evidence is in short supply. 1993). while development patterns influence both the amount and mode of travel. % suggests. of course. (Put simply. From a theoretical perspective. Researchers and planners have been attempting to understand and model these interactions for at least 30 years and they are the subject of a substantial literature. The pragmatic problem . Instone.3 To predict the effects of such an increase is no easy matter. This still implies an absolute increase in traffic. this simply means that the ‘right’ price has still not been applied.It will be argued. but by no means all. Even so. It might further be assumed that the cost increase would be effected entirely by fuel taxation. 1993. would be negligible. and land use patterns that reduce the need for movement. Some authors have taken a different view (see. In the Department’s model. that the Department of Transport may underestimate the scope for longer term adjustment. Whitelegg. The predicted effect on traffic is modest. If the assumptions are correct. by 2005. analysis using a Department of Transport econometric model may give some indication of potential impact (Virley. other regulatory measures and land use planning policies. quadrupling prices may stabilise or reduce vehicle emissions but would have little or no effect on other serious impacts of traffic and road construction. 1993). of the environmental costs of road travel.Prediction. Pearce et 01. Department of Transport. an approximate doubling of fuel prices in real terms by the year 2000 and an increase of a factor of four to five by 2025 (on top of increases assumed in National Road Traffic Forecasts) would be needed. for example. so that in many areas car use has become more of a necessity than a choice. The more significant impact on pollution occurs because of changes in vehicle characteristics. Since there has not been a prolonged period of sustained increase in real fuel prices. we might argue that if the costs of motoring were quadrupled. A flurry of activity during the 197Os. the Royal Commission (1994) recommends steady increases in fuel duty so as to double the price of fuel. 1992. Two implications follow: cost increases would need to be more draconian to effect substantial reductions in traffic. important questions arise about the effectiveness of pricing as a means of reducing the environmental impacts of transport. in the absence of other policy changes. relative to prices of other goods.4 This suggests that in order to stabilise carbon dioxide emissions at 1990 levels. Timescales are also significant. While all the details can be questioned.and long-term demand elasticities diverge significantly (Goodwin. Some estimates suggest that motorists bear only a small proportion of the more obvious costs that they impose: the figure of 27% is often quoted (for example.. A ‘back of the envelope’ calculation may serve to illustrate the point.) The impact on the roads programme. The above analysis suggests not only that the notion of the ‘right’ price is conceptually and operationally problematic. may in turn effect increases in the price elasticity of demand for individual motorised mobility. broadly defined. including changing investment priorities. There is nothing new in recognition of a relationship between land use and transport: it has long been accepted that travel costs. have a dynamic effect on land use. What is surprising is how long it has taken to gain political acceptance for the strategy that logically follows: the adoption of land use planning policies to reduce the need for movement and encourage the use of less polluting modes of transport. however. personal communication.if we accept that prices should nevertheless be used as a means to an end . this would go some way towards intemalising external costs and towards achieving the ‘socially optimum’ level of movement. The planning panacea One explanation for the relative price inelasticity of travel demand is that increasing mobility and dispersal of land uses have reinforced each other over at least half a century. because short. price increases of the order considered lead to reductions. it is assumed that travel beha‘The Royal Commission (1994) maintain that fuel duty has a number of advantages as an economic instrument for influencing decisions about additional journeys. of 7-12% by the year 2000 and 20-30% by 2025. people tend to choose more efficient cars but maintain their mobility. driven by concern about . 4Also. though many in the climate change scientific community would regard stabilisation as an inadequate and interim objective. but that economic instruments in isolation may not be markedly effective across the whole range of environmental effects. Ignoring this complication for the moment.. 1992). 46 viour will continue to be more responsive to GDP than to fuel price. The availability of alternative modes of transport. 1993).lies in the political risks associated with high and sustained real increases in motoring costs. Although the long-term demand elasticities used are relatively high. compared with base case traffic projections. when it proposes that the case for further increases should be reviewed. However. This includes congestion and accidents as well as estimates of some.. the overall implications are interesting. consistent with those of recent estimates in the literature. that if impacts remain unacceptable when prices have been increased. however. Oum et al. often regarded as the most efficient and direct way to influence travel behaviour. this is an interesting tacit acknowledgement that objectives have been defined independently of cost-benefit analysis (it suggests that we know what we want in the first place).
Models provide a simplified mathematical description of an observed situation. If we begin with a commitment to constrain travel by road. the effectiveness of the policies advocated in PPG 13 ‘will depend crucially on the transport policy context as a whole and on the ability of local planning authorities to achieve the necessary shifts in policy’. When travel is cheap. Results need not always be qualified by how particular land use patterns would perform ‘under current conditions of mobility’. At worst. in the face of other pressures. The emphasis in research has been on the travel or energy requirements associated with different land use patterns. Time and money spent on travelling is readily traded against these other factors. because we will never have perfect knowledge about the relationship between land use and transport. emissions . p 377).. development raises two interesting questions. ple. 1986). 47 . pricing and planning: S Owens resource depletion in the wake of the oil crisis. Policies related to this objective were in some instances deleted from structure plans by the Department of the Environment on the grounds that they were ‘non-land use’ policies (Owens. for examcongestion. such as pricing. there is something inconsistent about using a relatively blunt and typically long-term instrument to influence travel behaviour without applying more direct measures. Employers. rather than causal: it becomes an important means of maintaining access and choice within a future of lower mobility. This simple fact makes it difficult to define the most travel-efficient forms of development without making assumptions about future mobility. Even if it persuades planning authorities. empirical work has to deal with the real world in all its complexity. retail facilities and leisure opportunities. the policies could be counter-productive: concentration of development in conditions of high mobility. It also means that land use planning in isolation is not an effective way of reducing travel demand. to increase densities. may simply exacerbate planning will be reduced to a ‘contingency safeguard’ (Webster er al. If no other steps are taken to restrain traffic growth. retailers and developers respond appropriately in their locational decisions.3). typically informing a search for the ‘most efficient’.this time with a focus on pollution. especially amongst those who find the prospect of other measures. The most attractive. is that we have been asking the wrong questions.but also to some restoration of faith in land use policy after the ‘retreat from government’ (Cherry. since it is axiomatic in this framework that current trends are unacceptable. such as pricing. rather than the closest facilities are used: and homes are This important chosen for reasons other than proximity to work. people use mobility to extend their choice of jobs. What is needed to reduce uncertainty about the workings of the new guidance is not more research. The substantial shift in thinking in recent years can be attributed in part to environmental concerns . Publication of PPG 13 implies a tacit acceptance that enough is known. 1988. 1982) during the 1970s and 1980s. p 153) points out. more immediately threatening and unpalatable. mix land uses and relate development to public transport.Prediction. Department of the Environment. Thus while the Commission welcomes the Guidance as ‘an important statement of intent’. A clear limitation of approaching the problem from this direction is that the research findings identify necessary but not sufficient conditions for reducing the amount of travel and inducing modal shift: and there is a confusion of the need to travel (which can reasonably be related to land use variables) with the inclination to do so. the changing spatial pattern of opportunities may have little effect on the number and length of journeys undertaken. it stresses the need ‘to address specific limitations in the wider policy framework which will otherwise frustrate the intentions of integrating land use and transport policies’ (p 153). these will seem to counter well established trends. apart from the usual difficulties of translating intellectual recognition into practical policies. as long as advice is flexible and adaptable to specific circumstances. As the Royal Commission (1994. the advice in PPG 13 is likely to be wasted. local planning authorities can reduce reliance on the private car and make a significant contribution to the environmental goals set out in the Government’s sustainable development strategy (para I . The new thinking culminated in the publication of planning policy guidance on transport (PPG 13. the question becomes one of how land use planning policies might accommodate this trend-break in an efficient and equitable manner. and therefore about other factors and policies strongly influencing the propensity to travel. was characterised by confusion about the legitimacy of using the planning system to reduce resource consumption in transport. What can be demonstrated in theory will often not happen in practice. At best. they are still useful because they keep options open for the future. nor are they ever likely to do so. 1994) which legitimises the use of land use planning as an instrument of wider transport and environmental policies: By planning land use and transport together in ways which enable people to carry out their everyday activities with less need to travel. especially CO. Planning then emerges as permissive. The poli‘This is essentially the argument that even if policies have little impact on travel patterns under current conditions. especially about inefficient and robust development patterns to inform policy. what is efficient will be contingent: and while it is possible to identify robust policies. but a clear and consistent policy framework. Neither of these approaches has provided unambiguous information. and to improve their residential amenity. The goal has proved elusive. Why did it take so long to make the land use/transport/environment connection? And how effective are the policies urged in PPG 13 likely to be in practice? One reason for the long time scale.(j In any case. These qualifications often seem to be forgotten in the new found enthusiasm for planning as an instrument of transport and environmental policy.
This paper suggests. concentration of growth in moderately sized centres and design of the physical environment to provide safe and attractive conditions for walking and cycling . and that the whole is likely to be greater than the sum of the parts. Birmingham Bowers.frc.ort Pktnnin~: Vision und Pructicr Routledge and Kegan Paul. the model of ‘research-led policy’ can. It certainly did not eliminate all uncertainties in a field in which the timescale for well-founded empirical work stretches beyond the policy horizon and the costs may be disproportionately high. London Cherry. however. the Royal Commission (1994. The interesting question is whether PPG 13 is part of the process of this broader policy shift. pricing and planning: S Owens ties advocated in PPG 13 . There is a further implication if the objective is a sustainable transport policy. We need to recognise. In such circumstances. But working together.p Concluding comments The old tenets of conventional wisdom in transport policy have been seriously challenged. implementation and monitoring. and must be viewed as a whole’.y Longman. In a sense they imply a rethinking of what we mean by integration of transport and environmental policies. Harlow . Acknowledgement The author is grateful for the support of the Economic and Social Research Council. 1993) it produced few insights that could not have been gleaned from a thorough review of the existing literature. rhe Erwir-onment ond Sustaincrhle De~~elopmmt E & F N Spon.be translated into workable policies. whereas a growing consensus suggests that they must work in combination.Prediction.I (1993) ‘A conspectus on valuing the environment’ Jour-no/ ofhwir-onmental Planning and Monugement 36 (I) 91-100 Breheny. however. provide an excuse for indefinite procrastination. In proposing its own comprehensive package of policy measures. It will be necessary to consider the kind of environment that we want to hand on to future generations and to some extent to tailor transport policy to it. in Towns HMSO. for example . In the context of land use and transport the call for ‘further research’ has too often been used to avoid facing difficult policy decisions and the wheel has been reinvented many times.avoidance of obviously transport intensive development. Increasing prices. D and K Button (1992) Trunspor/. Theoretical and empirical research can now most fruitfully be conducted in parallel and in conjunction with policy development. London Banister. C (1963) Traf. The clear environmental targets proposed by the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (1994) as a framework for transport policy are a welcome and significant development in this context. While the concept of ‘integration’ found in European Union and UK policy documents implies meeting the need for mobility while ‘taking the environment into account’. Although a major project funded by the Departments of Environment and Transport provided the basis for PPG 13 and was published simultaneously with the draft (ECOTEC. London. This paper was written she held a Global Environment Change when Programme Fellowship to explore issues of land use planning and enivommental change. in the absence of startling new findings its publication would seem to be both indicative and partly constitutive of a significant policy shift. while people remain locked into land use patterns requiring high mobility.which have too readily been traded off against transport ‘benefits’ such as the aggregate of many small time savings. Only through such reinforcement will the intellectual recognition of the need for radical change . In support of the first interpretation is the fact that publication of the Guidance owes more to ‘the new realism’ than it does to definitive new answers from research. . Ceilings on emissions would provide one step in this direction. implying that the answer lies in ‘getting the price right’.‘the new 48 realism’ . that there is a temptation to replace them with new ‘panaceas’. 150-189 Buchanan. sustainability may require that we meet the imperatives of environmental protection while maximising accessibility within these constraints. References Adams. p 251) stresses that its recommendations ‘complement and reinforce each other. may be inequitable and politically risky.lv Plunning Assoc?ation &KthSCan. whereas land use planning policies aiming to reduce the need to travel will not persuade people to travel less if using cars remains cheap and convenient. ‘planning to reduce the need to travel’ or (though it is not discussed in detail in public transport’. G (1982) The Poiitrcr ofTown Pkunnin. J ( 19X I ) 7-ran. M and R Rookwood (1993) ‘Planning the sustainable city region’ in A Blowers (ed) Plunning jiw u Sustainuhle Enr~ironmmt A Report by the TOWI orld Count.would then be logical and necessary complements to other policy measures.~l. for example. But an equally important dimension lies in protection of other aspects of the environment valuable habitats and cultural landscapes. if required. Though it was still necessary politically to point to ‘research’ to legitimise the new policies in PPG 13. or an isolated (and therefore ineffectual) attempt to modify land use while the broader framework remains patterns unchanged. when there are inherent uncertainties and when the time and cost of producing meaningful results will simply be too great. these approaches have the potential to be mutually reinforcing. City Engineers Department and Department of Planning and Architecture. and they need to be disaggregated so that the expected contribution of the transport sector becomes clear. ‘major investment potential effects of such policies tend to be explored in isolation. and supported by complementary policies (such as traffic restraint and investment in public transport). The here). London Birmingham City Council (1993) ‘South Birmingham study public opinion survey (summary)’ Birmingham City Council. Further research will be useful in clarifying specific issues.
London Ghazi. P H Bly and N J Paulley (1988) Urhun Land Use und Transport Interaction: Pokies und Models Report of the International Study Group on Land Use/ Transport Interaction. S (1986) ‘Strategic Planning pricin. 20 February Goodwin. D (1984) Reasons und Persons Oxford University Press. Congestion: Is There A Wuy Out? Leading Edge Press and Publishing. Commission of the European Communities. M L and W E Oates (I 992) ‘Environmental economics: a survey’ Journal of Economk Literature 30 675-140 Department of the Environment and Department of Transport (1994) Pkunning Polic:v Guidance: Transport. Washington DC. Avebury. 14/91. C (1990) Speech to ‘The Route Ahead’ Conference. supplement p 14 Virley. participation and planning: the case of electricity generation in the United Kingdom’ in F Calzonetti and B Soloman (eds) GeogruphicuI Dimensions of Ener%cp Reidel. London Sagoff. (1992) ‘Concepts of price elasticity of transport demand and recent empirical estimates’ Transport Ewnomks and Poliq May Owens. Brussels Cropper. M C and P B Goodwin (1982) ‘Petrol prices and car use: a synthesis of conflicting evidence’ Trunspcwt Po/ic:v Decision Making 2 179-195 ECOTEC (1993) Reducing Transport Emissions Through Planning HMSO. London Dix. London Price. p 8 Vidal. 17 October. Commission of the European Dordrecht.y and planning: S Owens planning and energy conservation’ Town Revievt’ 57 (I) 69-86 Communities. WWF.. London Pearce. J (1993) ‘Tory revolt looms over roads policy’ Guurdiun 13 November. Aldershot Whitelegg. limits and sustainability: a conceptual framework and some dilemmas for the planning system’ Transactions of’ the Institute ofBritish Geographers N. S (1990) ‘Cost-benefit analysis: Glickman and M Gough (eds) Readings Future. J (1978) Motmxays V. (1994) Climate Chunge: The UK Programme Cm 2427. M (1988) The Ewnomy of the Earth Cambridge University Press. D W.y May Goodwin. C (1993) ‘Landscape economics: a personal journey of discovery’ Journul of Environmentul Plunning und Munugemrnt 36 (1)51-64 RAC Foundation London Royal Commission the Environment for Motoring A Vieu. Hawes 49 . London Metcalf A E (1978) ‘The perception of car running costs’ Paper 472/VII/78-EN. P (1992) ‘A review of new demonstrations of elasticity with special reference to short and long run effects of price change’ Transport Economics and Po/ic. PPG 13 HMSO. London Vidal. Trunsport and the Environment Transnet Tyme. on Environmental Pollution (1994) Trunsport and Eighteenth Report.e/. and the Environment to the Year 2020 the Erwir-onment: (1992) Curs und RAC Foundation. Democ. Cambridge Secretary of State for the Environment et al.rucy Macmillan.fi)r u Sustuinuhle Environmcwt A Report hy the Towv A. London Transnet ( 1990) Energy. or there will be tears’ Ohser-t. Oxford Parkinson. Cm 2674. C (1993) ‘Roads and wildlife: the (4) IS-18 Jacobs. 225-253 Owens. CEC (Commission of the European Communities) (1992) The Future Development of the Common Trunsport Policy: A Global Approach to the Construction of u Communit_v Framework for Sustainohle Mohilify COM (92) 494 final. P (1993) ‘Jam today: more jam tomorrow’ Ohscwei-. University of Cambridge Pearce. quoted in ‘Going Green’. J (1992) Truffrc. University of Oxford Transport Studies Unit. p. Minister. S (forthcoming) ‘Land.ssoc~iution Earthscan. M (1994) Sense and Sustainability of Rural England. A Markandya and E Barbier (1993) Blueprint 3: Measuring Sustainable De~~elopment Earthscan. 1 I l-l 30 und Country Plunnin~q ECOS 13 Owens. Department of Engineering. F Kenny and G Stokes (1991) Trunsport: The New Reulism Report to the Rees Jeffreys Road Fund. Brussels Oum. HMSO. Hatton. ETA Journal 25 May Peake. C (199 1) Transport Policy Anu/ysis: An Energy Analogy Management Studies Research Paper No. London. London Kelman. 1I Ghazi. S Hallett. HMSO.I37 Martin. we’re British’ Guur~licrn 4 March. HMSO. F V.S. T H et ul. S (1985) ‘Energy. J (1994) ‘No visions please. A Markandya and E Barbier (1989) Blueprint for u Green Economy Earthscan. D and R A W Shock (1989) Energy in the UK Trunsport no-win scenario’ Council for the Protection an ethical critique’ in Risk Resources in T S for the Use und Energy Efjcrenq Sector up to the Yew 2010 HMSO. in press Pa&. C and A Webb (1993) ‘Getting around: public and private transport’ in A Blowers (ed) Plunnin~q . S (1993) ‘The effect of fuel price increases on road transport CO2 emissions’ Transport Poliqy 1 (I) Webster. P (1994) ‘Brake now. (1994) Sustainuhle Development: The UK Strutegy Cm 2426. S and Hope. London Secretary of State for the Environment et ul. P. Oxford Gossop.Prediction. D W. I29.
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.