68 views

Uploaded by AGEGTAM

STATICALLY INDETERMINATE

STATICALLY INDETERMINATE

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

- Mechanics of Materials Solutions Chapter10 Probs29 46
- Elastic Foundation of beams Analysis.xls
- RILEM TC 162-TDF - Test and Design Methods for Steel Fibre Reinforced Concrete - BENDING TEST - Final Recommendation
- K12 For Timber Designers' Manuel By me.xls
- Bending Nptel
- Example Very Important
- Boef
- sugar cane
- deflection of beams
- Etabs Panelzoneandrigidoffset 290918 0052 12462
- Deflection of Beams
- concrete slab
- Course Handout MOS
- Mechanics of Materials
- Beam Deflection
- Reconciled Wip Sm
- 94267109-Portal-Frame.pdf
- Deflection 1
- CEE3404 Class Schedule 15
- Panel Zone Rigid ETABS-SAP2000

You are on page 1of 4

9.1 Basics

In Chapters 7 and 8 the stresses and deflections were determined for beams having various conditions of loading and support. In the cases treated it was always possible to completely determine the reactions exerted upon the beam merely by applying the equations of static equilibrium. In these cases the beams are said to be statically determinate. In this chapter we shall consider those beams where the number of unknown reactions exceeds the number of equilibrium equations available for the system. In such a case it is necessary to supplement the equilibrium equations with additional equations stemming from the deformations of the beam. In these cases the beams are said to be statically indeterminate.

Several common types of statically indeterminate beams are illustrated below. Although a wide variety of such structures exists in practice, the following four diagrams (Figs. 9-1, 9-2, and 9-3), will illustrate the nature of an indeterminate system. For the beams shown below the reactions of each constitute a parallel force system and hence there are two equations of static equilibrium available. Thus the determination of the reactions in each of these cases necessitates the use of additional equations arising from the deformation of the beam. 143

(a) (b)

In the case [Fig. 9-1(a)] of a beam fixed at one end and supported at the other, sometimes termed a supported cantilever, we have as unknown reactions R1, R2, and M1. The two statics equations must be supplemented by one equation based upon deformations. In Fig. 9-1(b) the beam is fixed at one end and has a flexible springlike support at the other. In the case of a simple linear spring the flexible support exerts a force proportional to the beam deflection at that point. The unknown reactions are again R1, R2, and M1. Again, the two statics equations must be supplemented by one equation stemming from deformations. 144 CHAPTER 9 Statically Indeterminate Elastic Beams As shown in Fig. 9-2, a beam fixed or clamped at both ends has the unknown reactions R1, R2, M1, and M2. The two statics equations must be supplemented by two equations arising from the deformations. In Fig. 9-3 the beam is supported on three supports at the same level. The unknown reactions are R1, R2,

and R3. The two statics equations must be supplemented by one equation based upon deformations. A beam of this type that rests on more than two supports is called a continuous beam. The following problems will illustrate the solution technique for solving problems involving statically indeterminate beams.

SOLVED PROBLEMS

9.1. A beam is clamped at A, simply supported at B, and subject to the concentrated force shown in Fig. 9-4. Determine all reactions assuming all dimensions are known.

w R1 R2 M1 M2

Fig. 9-2 A beam cantilevered at both ends. Fig. 9-3 A continuous beam with three supports.

y P A MA RA RB ab L

Fig. 9-4 SOLUTION: The reactions are RA, RB, and MA. From statics we have

M M Pa R L A A b 0 (1) F R R P y A B 0 (2) Thus there are two equations in the three unknowns RA, RB, and MA. We can supplement the statics equations with an equation stemming from deformations using the method of singularity functions to describe the bent beam. That is, EI dy dx R x M x P x a AA

2 2

2 2

221 (4) The first boundary condition is that at x 0, dy/dx 0, and thus C1 0. Integrating again, EIy Rx M xpxa AC A 2 3 2 2 3

323 2 (5)

The second boundary condition is that at x 0, y 0, and we find C2 0. The third boundary condition is that at x L, y 0. Substituting in Eq. (5), we have 0 626

323

RAL MAL Pb (6) Simultaneous solution of the three equations (1), (2), and (6) leads to R Pb L Lb R Pa L Lb M Pb L Lb

A B A

2 3 2 2 2

3 22 2 3 2 22

() () ()

9.2. The beam AB in Fig. 9-5 is clamped at A, spring supported at B, and loaded by the uniformly distributed load w per unit length. Prior to application of the load, the spring is just stress free. To determine the flexural rigidity EI of the beam, an experiment is conducted without the uniform load w and also without the spring being present. In this experiment it is found that a vertical force of 10 000 N applied at end B deflects that point 50 mm. The vertical force is removed, the spring is then attached to the beam at B and a uniform load of magnitude 5 kN/m is applied between A and B. Determine the deflection of point B under these conditions.

y w x A B k L 3 m M RB A RA

Fig. 9-5 SOLUTION: The forces acting on the beam when it is uniformly loaded as well as spring supported at its tip are

shown in Fig. 9-5. The force RB represents the force exerted by the spring on the beam. The differential equation of the bent beam is EI dy dx

M Rx w x AA

2 2 2

23 1 (2)

Now, invoking the boundary condition that when x 0, dy/dx 0, we find from Eq. (2) that C1 0. The second integration yields EIy M x R x w A A x C 2 6 24

234 2 (3)

and the second boundary condition is that x 0 when y 0, so from Eq. (3) we have C2 0. From Eq. (3) we have the deflection at B due to the uniform load plus the presence of the spring to be given by EIy M L R L wL

L

A A

234

2 6 24 (

- Mechanics of Materials Solutions Chapter10 Probs29 46Uploaded byArishChoy
- Elastic Foundation of beams Analysis.xlsUploaded byEFECAN
- RILEM TC 162-TDF - Test and Design Methods for Steel Fibre Reinforced Concrete - BENDING TEST - Final RecommendationUploaded byMihai Gheorghiu
- K12 For Timber Designers' Manuel By me.xlsUploaded bysajeerala
- Bending NptelUploaded byKarishmaBhagat
- Example Very ImportantUploaded byNashwa Abd El-rhman
- BoefUploaded byBoonme Chinnaboon
- sugar caneUploaded bySanjay Baid
- deflection of beamsUploaded byChaitanya Kumar
- Etabs Panelzoneandrigidoffset 290918 0052 12462Uploaded byTanveer Ahmad
- Deflection of BeamsUploaded byQual_08
- concrete slabUploaded byAhmed Ali
- Course Handout MOSUploaded bysuswagat
- Mechanics of MaterialsUploaded byNajaf Hussain
- Beam DeflectionUploaded byANIL
- Reconciled Wip SmUploaded byImran Mohammad
- 94267109-Portal-Frame.pdfUploaded byeidalin
- Deflection 1Uploaded bypetermac
- CEE3404 Class Schedule 15Uploaded byengkafuko
- Panel Zone Rigid ETABS-SAP2000Uploaded byCarlos Manuel Corregidor
- 2.1.1.a MaterialPropForcesUploaded byAntonio
- Experiment 3(Practical 1)Uploaded byVimal Mathivanan
- Lecture 30 and 31Uploaded byRatna Kommoji
- Lecture 30 and 31Uploaded byAditya Koutharapu
- D011562229.pdfUploaded bySudip
- Contoh Perhitungan SRPMK(1)Uploaded byAlam Maulana
- Lesson Plan SA-II (18-19)Uploaded bysubhansamuels
- Purity SlalUploaded byCarolineMwitaMoserega
- Beams for CompressionUploaded byShiela Sorino
- CoeffUploaded byankkeshmundra1

- Accugrade 140KUploaded byAGEGTAM
- ComparitionUploaded byAGEGTAM
- A rigid barUploaded byAGEGTAM
- Coriolis AccelerationUploaded byAGEGTAM
- Elastic BeamsUploaded byAGEGTAM
- Deflection of BeamsUploaded byAGEGTAM
- Adapter FittingUploaded byAGEGTAM
- l Shape ReserviorUploaded byAGEGTAM
- Rectangular CordinateUploaded byAGEGTAM
- Qun.Uploaded byAGEGTAM
- Line VelocityUploaded byAGEGTAM
- TubingUploaded byAGEGTAM
- Turbulent FlowUploaded byAGEGTAM
- CavitationUploaded byAGEGTAM
- FittingsUploaded byAGEGTAM
- Fluid FlowUploaded byAGEGTAM
- BafflesUploaded byAGEGTAM
- Stresses in BeamsUploaded byAGEGTAM
- Contact LoadingUploaded byAGEGTAM
- RECOMMENDED PART.docxUploaded byAGEGTAM
- Hydraulic System.docxUploaded byAGEGTAM
- Cooling System.docxUploaded byAGEGTAM
- Engine Type.docxUploaded byAGEGTAM
- Engine.docxUploaded byAGEGTAM
- General Condition.docxUploaded byAGEGTAM
- Cat Hammer.docxUploaded byAGEGTAM
- Cross Slope system.docxUploaded byAGEGTAM

- Translated Version of MDOC CFE EARTHQUAKE 2008 [Sec 3]Uploaded byMayur Patel
- UntitledUploaded byanon-579447
- installation analysisUploaded byMario Jacobson
- Structural_Analysis_of_a_Multi-Storeyed.pdfUploaded byAkash Bondili
- Model Tests on Sloshing of a Floating Roof in a Cylindrical Liquid Storage Tank Under Seismic ExcitationUploaded byoscargon19
- Edexcel-A-level-Bk2-Physics-Answers-FINAL.pdfUploaded byNasrin Sultana
- Spacer Damper IssuesUploaded byTravis Wood
- Matlab AnimationUploaded byHaseeb Rayhan
- FrictionUploaded bySudeesh Sudevan
- Weekly Test-6 - _8th ClassUploaded byKittu Yellisetty
- Bohr&atomic structure.pdfUploaded bykrish_cvr2937
- question bankUploaded byRed Rain
- TB Chapter5Uploaded byCowdrey Ilan
- Fracture - Material TechnologyUploaded byayushdbc
- Steady State FlowUploaded byNH Syzln
- lkjhgUploaded byGuillermo Vega
- Model Aircraft Structure ArticleUploaded bytdit84
- Mock Trial Exam Nicely DoneUploaded byanon_69201698
- DiffusionEquation.pdfUploaded byPhuong CR
- Conduction Heat Transfer Arpaci.Uploaded byAbhimanyu Ghosh
- Retaining_Wall.xlsUploaded byAndo OeBill Tampubolon
- Inelastic Buckling of Steel Struts Under Cyclic Load ReversalsUploaded byDiego Matias Burgos Fuentes
- AST Assignment 3Uploaded byramiresc76
- 1.pdfUploaded byclimax1364
- 5-Shear, Anchorage & Hold Down ReinforcementUploaded byRon Vora
- Lissajous.pdfUploaded byJayapal Rajan
- Analysis on Initiation of Sediment SuspensionUploaded byJesús Castillo González
- Simplifeid Approach in Analyzing Inelastic Behavior of Shallow Foundation Subjected to Dynamic LoadsUploaded bycontrerasc_sebastian988
- Composite ColumsUploaded byChethan Gowda
- hw1Uploaded byGabe