You are on page 1of 9

Marcel Mauss

Marcel Mauss
Marcel Mauss
Born 10 May 1872 pinal, Vosges, France 10 February 1950 (aged77) Paris, France

Died

Nationality French Fields Influences Sociology; Anthropology mile Durkheim

Influenced Claude Lvi-Strauss Keith Hart

Marcel Mauss (French:[mos]; 10 May 1872 10 February 1950; pronounced /mo:s/) was a French sociologist. The nephew of mile Durkheim, Mauss' academic work traversed the boundaries between sociology and anthropology. Today, he is perhaps better recognised for his influence on the latter discipline; particularly with respect to his analyses of topics such as magic, sacrifice and gift exchange in different cultures around the world. Mauss had a significant influence upon the founder of structural anthropology, Claude Lvi-Strauss.[1] His most famous book is The Gift (1925).

Background

Sociology

Outline

Theory History Positivism Antipositivism Functionalism Conflict theories Middle-range Mathematical Critical theory Socialization Structure and agency Research methods

Quantitative Qualitative

Marcel Mauss

2
Historical Computational Ethnographic Network-analytic Topics Subfields Change Cities Class Crime Culture Development Deviance Demography Education Economy Environment Family Gender Health Industry Internet Knowledge Law Literature Medicine Mobility Movements Networks Organizations Politics Race & ethnicity Religion Science Soc. psychology Stratification Browse

Portal Sociologists Journals Lists

Mauss was born in pinal, Vosges to a Jewish family, and studied philosophy at Bordeaux, where his uncle mile Durkheim was teaching at the time, and passed the agrgation in 1893. Instead of taking the usual route of teaching at a lyce, however, Mauss moved to Paris and took up the study of comparative religion and the Sanskrit language. His first publication in 1896 marked the beginning of a prolific career that would produce several landmarks in the sociological literature. Like many members of Anne Sociologique Mauss was attracted to socialism, particularly that espoused by Jean Jaurs. He was particularly active in the events of the Dreyfus affair and towards the end of the century he helped

Marcel Mauss edit such left-wing papers as Le Populaire, L'Humanit and Le Mouvement Socialiste, the last in collaboration with Georges Sorel. Mauss took up a chair in the 'history of religion and uncivilized peoples' at the Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes in 1901. It was at this time that he began drawing more and more on ethnography, and his work began increasingly to look like what we would today call anthropology. The years of World War I were absolutely devastating for Mauss. Many of his friends and colleagues died in the war, and Durkheim died shortly before its end. The postwar years were also difficult politically for Mauss. Durkheim had made changes to school curricula across France, and after his death a backlash against his students began. Like many other followers of Durkheim, Mauss took refuge in administration, securing Durkheim's legacy by founding institutions such as l'Institut Franais de Sociologie (1924) and l'Institut d'Ethnologie in 1926. In 1931 he took up the chair of Sociology at the Collge de France. He actively fought against anti-semitism and racial politics both before and after World War II. He died in 1950.

Theoretical views

Anthropology Archaeological Biological Cultural Linguistic Social Social and cultural subfields Applied Art Cognitive Cyborg Development Digital Ecological Environmental Economic Political economy Historical Feminist Kinship

Fields

Marcel Mauss Legal Media Medical Musical Nutritional Political Psychological Public Religion Science and technology Transpersonal Urban Visual Linguistics subfields Anthropological Descriptive Ethno Historical Semiotic Sociolinguistics Ethnopoetics Archaeological and biological subfields Anthrozoological Biocultural Evolutionary Feminist Forensic Maritime Palaeoanthropological Research framework Ethnography Ethnology Cross-cultural comparison Participant observation Online ethnography Holism Reflexivity Thick description Cultural relativism

Marcel Mauss Ethnocentrism Emic and etic History of anthropology Key theories Actor-network and alliance theory Cross-cultural studies Cultural materialism Culture theory Feminism Functionalism Interpretive Performance studies Political economy Practice theory Structuralism Post-structuralism Systems theory Key concepts Evolution Society Culture Prehistory Sociocultural evolution Kinship and descent Gender Race Ethnicity Development Colonialism Postcolonialism Value Lists Outline Bibliography Journals By years Organizations Anthropologists by nationality Anthropology portal

Marcel Mauss In his classic work The Gift, Mauss argued that gifts are never "free". Rather, human history is full of examples that gifts give rise to reciprocal exchange. The famous question that drove his inquiry into the anthropology of the gift was: "What power resides in the object given that causes its recipient to pay it back?" (1990:3). The answer is simple: the gift is a "total prestation", imbued with "spiritual mechanisms", engaging the honour of both giver and receiver (the term "total prestation" or "total social fact" (fait social total) was coined by his student Maurice Leenhardt after Durkheim's social fact). Such transactions transcend the divisions between the spiritual and the material in a way that according to Mauss is almost "magical". The giver does not merely give an object but also part of himself, for the object is indissolubly tied to the giver: "the objects are never completely separated from the men who exchange them" (1990:31). Because of this bond between giver and gift, the act of giving creates a social bond with an obligation to reciprocate on part of the recipient. To not reciprocate means to lose honour and status, but the spiritual implications can be even worse: in Polynesia, failure to reciprocate means to lose mana, one's spiritual source of authority and wealth. Mauss distinguished between three obligations: giving - the necessary initial step for the creation and maintenance of social relationships; receiving, for to refuse to receive is to reject the social bond; and reciprocating in order to demonstrate one's own liberality, honour and wealth. An important notion in Mauss' conceptualisation of gift exchange is what Gregory (1982, 1997) refers to as "inalienability". In a commodity economy there is a strong distinction between objects and persons through the notion of private property. Objects are sold, meaning that the ownership rights are fully transferred to the new owner. The object has thereby become "alienated" from its original owner. In a gift economy, however, the objects that are given are inalienated from the givers; they are "loaned rather than sold and ceded". It is the fact that the identity of the giver is invariably bound up with the object given that causes the gift to have a power which compels the recipient to reciprocate. Because gifts are inalienable they must be returned; the act of giving creates a gift-debt that has to be repaid. Because of this, the notion of an expected return of the gift creates a relationship over time between two individuals. In other words, through gift-giving a social bond evolves that is assumed to continue through space and time until the future moment of exchange. Gift exchange therefore leads to a mutual interdependence between giver and receiver. According to Mauss, the "free" gift that is not returned is a contradiction because it cannot create social ties. Following the Durkheimian quest for understanding social cohesion through the concept of solidarity, Mauss's argument is that solidarity is achieved through the social bonds created by gift exchange.

Critiques
Mauss's views on the nature of gift exchange have not been without their critics. French anthropologist Alain Testart (1998) for example argues that there are "free" gifts, such as passers-by giving money to beggars in e.g. a large Western city. Donor and receiver do not know each other and are unlikely to ever meet again. In this context, the donation certainly creates no obligation on the side of the beggar to reciprocate; neither the donor nor the beggar have such an expectation. Testart argues that only the latter can actually be enforced. He feels that Mauss overstated the magnitude of the obligation created by social pressures, particularly in his description of the potlatch amongst North American Indians. Another example of a non-reciprocal "free" gift is provided by British anthropologist James Laidlaw (2000). He describes the social context of Indian Jain renouncers, a group of itinerant celibate renouncers living an ascetic life of spiritual purification and salvation. The Jainist interpretation of the doctrine of ahimsa (an extremely rigorous application of principles of nonviolence) influences the diet of Jain renouncers and compels them to avoid preparing food as this could potentially involve violence against microscopic organisms. Since Jain renouncers do not work, they rely on food donations from lay families within the Jain community. However, the former must not appear to be having any wants or desires, and only very hesitantly and apologetically receive the food prepared by the latter. "Free" gifts therefore challenge the aspects of the Maussian notion of the gift unless we take into consideration the moral and non-material qualities of gifting. These aspects are, of course, at the heart of the gift, as demonstrated in books such as Annette Weiner's (1992), Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping While Giving.

Marcel Mauss

Legacy
While Mauss is known for several of his own works - most notably his masterpiece Essai sur le Don ('The Gift') much of his best work was done in collaboration with members of the Anne Sociologique, including Durkheim (Primitive Classification), Henri Hubert (Outline of a General Theory of Magic and Essay on the Nature and Function of Sacrifice), Paul Fauconnet (Sociology) and others. Like many prominent French academics, Mauss did not train a great number of students. Nonetheless, many anthropologists claim to have followed in his footsteps, most notably Claude Lvi-Strauss. The essay on The Gift is the origin for anthropological studies of reciprocity. His analysis of the Potlatch has inspired Georges Bataille (The Accursed Share); then the situationists (the name of the first situationist journal was "Potlatch"); and has been used by many interested in gift economies and Open Source software, although this latter use sometimes differs from Mauss's original formulation. See also Lewis Hyde's revolutionary critique of Mauss in "Imagination and the Erotic Life of Property".

Bibliography by Mauss
Essai sur la nature et la fonction du sacrifice, (with Henri Hubert) 1898. La sociologie: objet et mthode, (with Paul Fauconnet) 1901. De quelques formes primitives de classification, (with Durkheim) 1902. Esquisse d'une thorie gnrale de la magie, (with Henri Hubert) 1902. Essai sur le don, 1924. Les Techniques du corps, 1934. [2] Journal de Psychologie 32 (3-4). Reprinted in Mauss, Sociologie et anthropologie, 1936, Paris: PUF. Sociologie et anthropologie, (selected writings) 1950. The works of Marcel Mauss [3] are available free of charge (in French) in the "Les classiques des sciences sociales" [4] web site, inside the "Les auteurs classiques" [5] collection.

Notes
[1] Barth, Fredrik (2005). One discipline, four ways: British, German, French, and American anthropology. University of Chicago Press, p. 208, Quote: "Marcel Mauss two most influential followers were Claude Levi-Strauss (b. 1908) and Louis Dumont (1911-1998). The impact of his work on both of them was strong. [2] http:/ / classiques. uqac. ca/ classiques/ mauss_marcel/ socio_et_anthropo/ 6_Techniques_corps/ Techniques_corps. html [3] http:/ / classiques. uqac. ca/ classiques/ mauss_marcel/ mauss_marcel. html [4] http:/ / classiques. uqac. ca/ [5] http:/ / classiques. uqac. ca/ classiques/

References
Derrida, J., 1992 [1991]. Given Time I. Counterfeit Money. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press. Cannell, Fenella (2006) The anthropology of Christianity (http://books.google.com/ books?id=wO0pTd_UzlkC&PA=2), Introduction Gregory, C. A. 1982. Gifts and Commodities. London. Gregory, C. A. 1997. Savage money: the anthropology and politics of commodity exchange. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic. Laidlaw, J. 2000. A free gift makes no friends Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 6:617-634. (http:// www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1467-9655.00036) Mauss, M. 1990 (1922). The Gift: forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies. London: Routledge. Testart, A. 1998. 'Uncertainties of the 'Obligation to Reciprocate': A Critique of Mauss' in Marcel Mauss: A Centenary Tribute. James, W. and Allen, N. J. (eds.). New York: Berghahn Books.

Marcel Mauss Weiner, Annette (1992). Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping While Giving. Berkeley, University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-07604-4.

Further reading
Dianteill, Erwan, ed., Marcel Mauss Lanthropologie de lun et du multiple, Paris, PUF, collection Dbats philosophiques , 2013. Dzimira, Sylvain, Marcel Mauss, savant et politique, La Dcouverte, 2007 ( lire en ligne la prface de Marcel Fournier, le sommaire et l'intro. (http://www.revuedumauss.com.fr/Pages/DZI.html#Anchor-19-11481)). Fournier, Marcel. 1994. Marcel Mauss. Fayard: Paris (the definitive biography in French). Ferguson, Kennan. 2007. 'The Gift of Freedom.' Social Text. 25:2 39-52. (http://socialtext.dukejournals.org/ content/vol25/issue2_91/index.dtl) Lvi-Strauss, C.. 1987 [1950]. Introduction to the Work of Marcel Mauss. London. Routledge. Moebius, Stephan/Papilloud, Christian (Ed.). 2005. Gift Marcel Mauss' Kulturtheorie der Gabe. Wiesbaden: VS. Moebius, Stephan. 2006. Marcel Mauss. Konstanz Fournier, Marcel. Marcel Mauss: A Biography, PUP, 2005 (http://www.pupress.princeton.edu/titles/8038. html)

Article Sources and Contributors

Article Sources and Contributors


Marcel Mauss Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=565516288 Contributors: Adrianzenz, Alex Golub, Attilios, BCtl, Bearcat, Bender235, Berox, CMEHalverson, Charles D. Laughlin, D6, Dadofsam, DaiFh, Darwinek, Deipnosophista, Dekaels, Doctormatt, Dpv, Elsass3, Euchiasmus, EvaristoAugello, Gabbe, Grafen, Graham87, Gudshead, Gzornenplatz, Hallmark, Hgfischer, Hmains, Hyacinth, Ignacio Bibcraft, Jafro, Japanese Searobin, Jfortier, Jfpierce, JorgeGG, Jurema Oliveira, KF, Kalogeropoulos, KnowledgeOfSelf, Korotayev, Lawrencekhoo, Legotech, Margana, Maunus, Meclee, Mitrius, Monegasque, Mtevfrog, MuZemike, Murtasa, Numbo3, Olivier, Omnipaedista, Ontaov, PT14danang, Pathawi, PelleSmith, Penbat, Phauly, Plindenbaum, RCS, Rd232, ResidueOfDesign, Rhbsihvi, Rich Farmbrough, Salleman, Schrauwers, Shepazu, Shomon, Sue Gardner, SummerWithMorons, Sunray, The Fifth Horseman, Tomsega, Ufinne, Viriditas, Vox Rationis, Wizardman, Woland1234, Woohookitty, pa, 64 anonymous edits

Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors


Image:SNA segment.png Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:SNA_segment.png License: GNU General Public License Contributors: Screenshot taken by User:DarwinPeacock File:Da Vinci Vitruve Luc Viatour.jpg Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Da_Vinci_Vitruve_Luc_Viatour.jpg License: Public Domain Contributors: Original drawing: Photograpy: File:Moai Easter Island InvMH-35-61-1.jpg Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Moai_Easter_Island_InvMH-35-61-1.jpg License: Public Domain Contributors: User:Jastrow

License
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported //creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/