39 views

Uploaded by aktc

Linzell - Computational Simulation of Blast Effects on Structural Components

- Numerical Analysis of Ship Motion
- 83627313 Aliakbar Kabir CFD Project
- IJTTE_Caramatescu
- 1-s2.0-S0360132399000475-main
- Flyer MAE Research 2015
- Introduction to CFX-5
- CFD Paper-4
- Fluid Mechanics Cengel (solutions manual)Chap15-001
- FVM Applied to the Computational Modelling of Welding Phenomena
- ANSYS Multiphase Modelling
- 24 Ratnayake Melaaen Datta
- Unsteady Film Cooling on HP Gas Turbine
- Stephan Geerts
- Cfd Simulation of Truss Spar Vortex-Induced Motion
- Blast Resistant Buildings
- Abstracts Undergraduate 2010-2011 DRAFT
- Rel Notes v161
- 259_Bhunia
- Lecture Notes_Metal Forming
- Asymmetric Behavior of Propeller–Rudder System

You are on page 1of 46

Daniel G. Linzell

Associate Professor Civil and Environmental Engineering

Lyle N. Long

Distinguished Professor Aerospace Engineering

Abner Chen

Ph.D. Candidate Civil and Environmental Engineering

Emre Alpman

Postdoctoral Researcher Aerospace Engineering

Acknowledgements

z

Office of Naval Research Penn State University Applied Research Lab

z

z

APCI

Objectives

z

z

z

z

Detailed coupled gas/chemistry simulations of detonations Large scale simulations of pressure loadings using time-accurate CFD Fluid/structure simulations under blast/impact loadings Coating materials to help make structures blast/impact resistant – polyurea

**Background – Blast resistant materials (polyurea)
**

z Polyurea

z Introduced by Texaco in 1989 z Known Advantages vs. Polyurethanes (traditional coatings) z Applications

z DoD – Civil Infrastructure z DoD – other apps

Army/Navy – Spray on armor (Humvees) Navy – Ship hulls (U.S.S. Cole) Rail cars Water storage tanks Chemical plant infrastructure

z Other – Civil Infrastructure

Sources:

PCI: http://www.pcimag.com/CDA/Archives/779f754db76a7010VgnVCM100000f932a8c0 DefenseReview.com: http://www.defensereview.com/article502.html, Polymer Materials for Structural Retrofit, Knox et al., AFRL

Army Times .Background – Blast resistant materials (polyurea) z DoD applications – Polyurea z z z z z Untreated stud wall AFRL ERDC-WES Army Navy Pentagon z Retrofit Coated with polyurea z Public domain? Source: Polymer Materials for Structural Retrofit. Knox et al.. AFRL.

Blast Simulation CFD Method z z z z Unstructured-grid. thoroughly validated on a wide range of problems . Runge-Kutta time marching Code is called PUMA2 Has been in use at Penn State for many years. time-accurate Euler code Finite volume.

Assumptions z z z 75 lbs.Blast CFD . of TNT Explosive is spherical in geometry Uniform explosion .

9 1 r/R .6 0.1 0.7 0.2 0.Initial Pressure Profile Initial Pressure Profile 160000 140000 120000 100000 p/p 0 80000 60000 40000 20000 0 0 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.Blast CFD .8 0.

00015 0.2m P (atm) 10 1 0 0.00025 t (sec) 0.0001 0.0004 0.00045 0.Blast CFD .0005 .5m r = 0.0003 0.Pressure History P ressure H istories at D ifferent Locations 10000 1000 100 r = 1m r = 0.00035 0.0002 0.00005 0.

Blast CFD – PUMA2 Comparisons to ConWep .

Blast CFD . of TNT Plate located approx 3 ft away from the explosive .Simulations Including Steel Plate z z z Plate Dimensions (60in by 60in) 75 lbs.

004 0.Loading History at Plate Center Loading History at the Center of the Plate 1000 100 P (atm) 10 1 0.001 0.006 t (sec) .005 0.01 0 0.1 0.Blast CFD .002 0.003 0.

Background – Fluid/structure simulations z z Commercial codes Interaction z Loosely coupled z z Mechanisms behind protection? Parameters to control performance? 3-D .

Focus Areas – fluid/structure interaction z Numerical fluid/structure program z z z z Material models Comparison of ABAQUS and LS-DYNA Comparison of PUMA2 and ConWep Effect of polyurea on steel plate under blast loading Material properties Validation testing z Experimental fluid/structure program z z .

Fluid/structure interaction z Numerical fluid/structure program z z z z Material models – via literature Comparison of ABAQUS and LS-DYNA Comparison of PUMA2 and ConWep Effect of polyurea on steel plate under blast loading Material properties Validation testing z Experimental fluid/structure program z z .

2003) A=66.Steel z Steel (AISI 4340) z z Johnson-Cook material model (Kurtaran and Eskandarian.03 σ = A+B ε ε pl [ & )][ ( ) ][1 + Cln(ε 1− T pl n * *m ] : equivalent plastic strain : normalized plastic strain rate &* ε * T − Troom T = Tmelt − Troom . C=0. B=100. n=0.014. and m=1.Material model .7.4.26.

Polyurea z z Polyurea (APCI) Mie-Gruneisen equation of state (Fuentes 2006) A hydrodynamic material model A function of density and internal energy P − PH = Γρ ( E m − E H ) ρ0 Γ = Γ0 ρ Γ0 : material constant ρ0 : reference density PH η EH = 2ρ 0 ρ 0C0 η PH = (1 − sη ) 2 2 ρ0 η = 1− ρ C0 and s are material constants .Material model .

Numerical program z z z Abaqus .Explicit LS-Dyna PUMA2 .

Fluid/structure interaction z Numerical fluid/structure program z z z z Material models Comparison of ABAQUS and LS-DYNA Comparison of PUMA2 and ConWep Effect of polyurea on steel plate under blast loading Material properties Validation testing z Experimental fluid/structure program z z .

Numerical analysisABAQUS and LS-DYNA .

Pressure time-history of the impact load 6.004 0.0E+004 2.0E+004 Pressure (psi) 3.0E+004 1.0E+000 0 0.01 0.0E+004 5.002 0.0E+004 0.008 Time (sec) 0.012 .006 0.0E+004 4.

002 0.004 0.5 -2 0 0.012 .008 Time (sec) 0.006 0.Displacement 0.01 0.5 ABAQUS LS-DYNA 0 Displacement (in) -0.5 -1 -1.

002 0.2x10 5 Von Mises Stress (psi) 1.0x10 5 8.0x10 4 6.012 .004 0.006 0.0x10 4 ABAQUS LS-DYNA 0.01 0.0x10 0 0 0.Von Mises Stress 1.0x10 4 4.008 Time (sec) 0.0x10 4 2.4x10 5 1.

012 .006 0.002 0.01 0.Internal energy Comparison of internal energy for mesh size 1"x1"x1" LS-DYNA ABAQUS 1E+005 8E+004 Internal Energy (lb-in) 6E+004 4E+004 2E+004 0E+000 0 0.004 0.008 Time (sec) 0.

Fluid/structure interaction z Numerical fluid/structure program z z z z Material models Comparison of ABAQUS and LS-DYNA Comparison of PUMA2 and ConWep Effect of polyurea on steel plate under blast loading Material properties Validation testing z Experimental fluid/structure program z z .

Numerical program – Comparison of PUMA2 & ConWep z z z FEM program: LS-DYNA Steel plate: 60”x60”x0. no failure criterion PUMA2 CFD code (complex spatial and temporal loading) ConWep (Blast function provided in LS-DYNA) z Load z z .25” Steel (AISI 4340) z Johnson-Cook material model – literature.

S. Army Waterways Experiment Station Empirical model z Blast function (ConWep) z z . PUMA2 z z Solve Euler equations Neglect viscous effect U.Background z CFD code.

Configuration of the model .

004 Time (s) 0.002 0.008 .006 0.Comparison of displacements 0 -2 PUMA2 ConWep z-displacement (in) -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 0 0.

002 0.006 0.Comparison of von Mises stress 180000 160000 140000 120000 100000 80000 60000 40000 20000 0 0 0.004 Time (s) 0.008 PUMA2 ConWep V-M stress (psi) .

Fluid/structure interaction z Numerical fluid/structure program z z z z Material models Comparison of ABAQUS and LS-DYNA Comparison of PUMA2 and ConWep Effect of polyurea on steel plate under blast loading Material properties Validation testing z Experimental fluid/structure program z z .

0.Numerical program – Effect of polyurea on steel plate under blast loading z z z z z Steel plate: 60”x60”x0.25”.5” Steel (AISI 4340) z Johnson-Cook material model Polyurea (Air Products) z Mie-Gruneisen Equation of State Load: PUMA2 CFD code (complex spatial and temporal loading) .25” Thickness of coating: 0”. 0.

Numerical program – Steel plate without polyurea .

25” thick polyurea .Numerical program – Steel plate with 0.

Numerical program – Steel plate with 0.5” thick polyurea .

005 Time (s) .0 2.0 18.0 10.0 0.Deflection at the center 20.0 4.004 0.002 0.0 8.0 14.0 12.5" polyurea Displacement (in) 0.25" polyurea 0.001 0.000 No coating 0.0 6.0 16.003 0.0 0.

E+06 7.E+06 2.E+06 3.E+06 Kinetic energy (lbf-in) 8.004 0.003 0.005 No coating 0.E+00 0.E+06 4.E+06 6.E+06 5.002 0.Kinetic energy 9.001 0.25" polyurea 0.E+06 0.E+06 1.000 0.5" polyurea Time (s) .

impact Relevant loading regimes Membrane action . viscous or crushable foam vs. M-G) Coated plate Pressure.polyurea Interface failure .polyurea and steel z Numerical failure mode prediction z z z z Failure criteria prediction z z . temperature.g.Current focus areas – numerical program z Sensitivity analyses z z Model construction Constitutive model selection – Polyurea (e.

Experimental program z Material properties z Characterization – steel and polyurea z Validation Testing z Impact and/or Blast z Coated and uncoated z Varying coating thickness z Locations z PSU CITEL z Others .

Coupon testing .displacement .Steel •ASTM E8 •Extensometer .

04 0. strain 120000 100000 True stress (psi) 80000 60000 40000 20000 0 0 0.16 True strain (in/in) .06 0.12 0.Results – stress vs.1 0.02 0.14 0.08 0.

4 (ksi) σ = A+B ε [ & )][ ( ) ][1 + Cln(ε 1− T pl n * *m ] .7 (ksi) Material constant B = 100.Material constants for JC model z Using a least squares fitting method z z Material constant A = 66.

Current focus areas – experimental program z z z Coupon testing –Polyurea (APCI) Validation testing specimen prep Validation testing determination and matrix development .

Summary .

edu .edu z Long lnl@psu.Questions? Contact Info z Linzell DLinzell@engr.psu.

- Numerical Analysis of Ship MotionUploaded byAbhi
- 83627313 Aliakbar Kabir CFD ProjectUploaded byakinojohnkennedy
- IJTTE_CaramatescuUploaded byAdrian Caramatescu
- 1-s2.0-S0360132399000475-mainUploaded byLeticia Delapaz
- Flyer MAE Research 2015Uploaded bySrivatsan Sampath
- Introduction to CFX-5Uploaded bysangsharma
- CFD Paper-4Uploaded byviswamanoj
- Fluid Mechanics Cengel (solutions manual)Chap15-001Uploaded byNURUL SYUHADA BT ISMAIL HAJAR
- FVM Applied to the Computational Modelling of Welding PhenomenaUploaded byal-masri
- ANSYS Multiphase ModellingUploaded byjoreli
- 24 Ratnayake Melaaen DattaUploaded bySen Van
- Unsteady Film Cooling on HP Gas TurbineUploaded byraul19rs
- Stephan GeertsUploaded byEswaran Manakor
- Cfd Simulation of Truss Spar Vortex-Induced MotionUploaded byEl riza annaml
- Blast Resistant BuildingsUploaded byomermmka
- Abstracts Undergraduate 2010-2011 DRAFTUploaded byDoceigen
- Rel Notes v161Uploaded byzebra00
- 259_BhuniaUploaded byBangun Adi Wibowo
- Lecture Notes_Metal FormingUploaded byIrfan Khan
- Asymmetric Behavior of Propeller–Rudder SystemUploaded bysumardiono10
- Lectures on Computational Fluid DynamicsUploaded byAbhiyan Paudel
- PDF (Published Version)Uploaded by3azeez
- 1109.3563v2Uploaded bycata_alex_munt
- Lecture notes_Metal Forming.pdfUploaded byIrfan Khan
- Optimization of Bajaj three wheeler carburetor fuel tube for better performanceUploaded bydbpublications
- Cfd Manual FluentUploaded byLaxman Kumar
- Buoyancy-Induced Flow in Open Rotating CavitiesUploaded byAjith Krishnan
- 2007 1087 Conf Comp SimulationUploaded byPruthviraj
- Investigation On Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Simulation for Wind Effects On Tall Tapered BuildingsUploaded byInternational Journal for Scientific Research and Development - IJSRD
- Som Test SetUploaded bysebin

- BDE Long Span Bridges SupplementUploaded byaktc
- DN-14 BlastUploaded byaktc
- Early Finite ElementUploaded bysaulhoudson
- Bridge Vulnerability Explosion Mit w CvrUploaded byaktc
- Wave Analysis-Advanced Methods for Ultimate and Fatigue Strength of FloatersUploaded byaktc
- BS5950!1!2000 Steel Code Check Theory EnuUploaded bypopaciprian27
- chapter2-00Uploaded byr96221029
- Midas verification GNL-011Uploaded byjavimm
- FEA Tutorials BK1Uploaded byAbdul Aziz
- 03 Prediction of Design Wind SpeedsUploaded bymdkml2
- TestingUploaded byaktc
- Recent Applications of Damping Systems for Wind ResponseUploaded byaktc
- Cable Stayed BridgeUploaded byaktc
- NCAC G41S W-beam Height Report Final 120407Uploaded byaktc
- EN1993 Practice Paper-buckling Analysis of Steel BridgesUploaded byaktc
- Blast Impact Resistance Laminated Glass StructuresUploaded byaktc
- Transformers 20th Anniversary Optimus Prime InstructionUploaded byaktc
- HOL - The Use of High-fidelity Analysis for Reliable Buckling Load CalculationsUploaded byaktc
- Phuc Trav Van-Experiments and Numerical Modeling of a Rockfall Protective Wire Rope FenceUploaded byaktc
- Strand7 - Buckling Analysis - Linear vs NonlinearUploaded byaktc
- THORNTON - Three-Dimensional Suspension StructuresUploaded byaktc
- LS DYNA FAQ.quasi StaticUploaded byaktc
- FEM of Time Effects in RC Structures CMMUploaded byaktc
- Geobrugg-Flexible Ring Net Barriers for Debris Flow Protection-The Economic SolutionUploaded byaktc
- LS-DYNA Concrete MaterialUploaded byaktc
- Wu-Performance of LS-DYNA Concrete Constitutive ModelsUploaded byaktc
- VSL Catalog PtUploaded byVu Phi Long
- Stay Cable Monitoring With Fiber OpticsUploaded byaktc
- LUSAS Linear and Nonlinear Buckling AnalysisUploaded byaktc

- Daniell CellUploaded bySiew Kiong Wong
- Biological WastwaterUploaded byLeanne Martin
- Report_25.07.2012_Rev1Uploaded bymts1234
- High-pressure Phase Transitions in MgCr2O4·Mg2SiO4 Composition_Reactions Between Olivine and Chromite With Implications for Ultrahigh-pressure Chromitites 18_AkaogiUploaded byDimitrios Kostopoulos
- chem exUploaded bymerishintya
- 1-s2.0-S1750583617303080-mainUploaded byAjit Parwani
- SHMUploaded byAnonymous CPHpkPlyEW
- gummy bear lab reportUploaded byapi-265906736
- 4NA - Heat Transfer.pptUploaded byChico Alves
- Fluidization and Its Applications to Food ProcessingUploaded byAnonymous yPWi8p3KkA
- Electrical System ChecksUploaded byTomy George
- CamposUploaded bysantinodevitruvio
- LAMINAR VISCOUS FLOW HEAT TRANSFER UNIT.docUploaded byalgan7
- Hydrogen Oxygen ElctrolisisUploaded byMorgan Orcutt
- Science Enginering Lab Report_Experiment 3 (Buoyant Force)Uploaded byQ Hydar Q Hydar
- Molecular GeometryUploaded byZhuang Houlong
- Saha Raj Ieaust 2004Uploaded byVirgil Udrea
- 6.-Darcy'sLaw&K_W2-Lecture6.pdfUploaded byCerón Niño Santiago
- Chapter 1 SolutionsUploaded bySudhir Narang
- Tutorial 2Uploaded byizzril
- C7 til June10Uploaded byShawn Soares
- TentUploaded byhanyassawy
- Metamaterial - Wikipedia, The Free EncyclopediaUploaded byrodrir327
- 99213ebe49957005acb1a781b368759d-originalUploaded byvillamor niez
- 2-D Motion LabUploaded byjinyuanhu
- Mass SpectrometryUploaded byExamville.com
- MIT22_02S12_lec_ch1Uploaded byharsimran.dua8479
- Federico Becca, Frederic Mila and Didier Poilblanc- Tetramerisation of a frustrated spin-1/2 chainUploaded byPo48HSD
- Phys. Rev. D91 012006 (2015)Uploaded byJuan Antonio Valls Ferrer
- Simulation of Partial Oxidation of Natural Gas to Synthesis Gas Using ASPEN PLUS (Excelente Para Simulacion)Uploaded byserch