Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

9 views

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

- Sop
- Transient Production Forecast
- Vibration and Condition Monitoring
- Rakesh's Resume
- virtual lab-water quality
- Piping Definition
- Coal Slurry Production JAPAN[1]
- hecras
- Graduation Audit - Ch400
- ChE Presentation for University Days
- Design of Reclamation Vessel
- A036513001.pdf
- Distribuc..
- References.pdf
- 306877301-Flame-Arrestor-Datasheet.pdf
- Flat Flow Kit
- 02. Chapter Two - Dimension Analysis
- Che Eng
- u of u engineering personal statement
- Rayleigh Tabulated Data

You are on page 1of 4

or stream modeling; it is not a substitute for a good hydraulics text or the HEC-RAS program manuals. Refer to the document General Guidelines for the Hydrologic-Hydraulic Assessment of Floodplains in Indiana for general information regarding modeling requirements for the Division of Water. This is written assuming HEC-RAS as the modeling program; but the general concepts are applicable to any hydraulic modeling program. I acknowledge that there may be situations where these items might not be applicable, the complexities of hydraulic modeling precludes a comprehensive look at every possible instance of critical depth problems. What is critical depth? In open channel hydraulics, critical depth is the depth of flow (for a given discharge) where the specific energy is at a minimum. The total energy head (specific energy) for a cross section is given by:

H = WS +

V 2 2g

Where H is the total energy head, WS is the water surface elevation and V2 / 2g is the velocity head. Typically, the minimum specific energy can be shown in an Energy vs. Water Surface Elevation diagram, as shown below:

Page 1 of 4

Depths of flow greater than WScrit are known as subcritical flow while depth of flow less than WScrit indicates supercritical flow. What does it mean when HEC-RAS defaults to critical depth? It means mainly either of two things: The steady flow equations cannot be solved in a given number of trials (typically 20 trials) During the iteration process, depth of flow for a trial goes below critical depth (assuming a subcritcal profile), indicating a possible hydraulic jump, and an invalid subcritical solution.

Why is defaulting to critical depth not acceptable? The program is not really calculating an answer, it is giving up on trying to solve the equations, either because its tried too many times, or conditions indicate that a proper solution is not obtainable. Critical depth assumptions can mask project surcharges, or can cause calculation problems in defining floodways.

What can be done? Look at not only the offending cross section, but at the section downstream. The program is having a problem with the calculations between the cross section in question and the section just downstream. Often the problem section is the downstream section. Check cross sections for obvious errors, many problems of this type are caused by bad data in the model. When importing old HEC-2 files, spikes in the data are often apparent. Also when importing HEC-2 files, look for cracks in low chord data at bridges. HEC-2 required that the low chord data matched the cross section exactly. However, this was easy to mess up, resulting in small openings that do not contribute much cross sectional area to a section, but a large amount of wetted perimeter. Delete extraneous low chord data and let HEC-RAS clip the road profile to the section automatically. Bridges that are coded with the road fill within the section often cause critical depth errors, since extra losses are introduced into the bridge solution by artificially extending the bridge to the bounding sections, which is not appropriate. Check cross section locations are the cross sections located correctly? o Is the cross section going up a tributary swale? o Are they located perpendicular to flow? Are more cross sections needed in the model? o Check alpha does it change greatly from section to section Page 2 of 4

o Is the flow distribution reasonable? (between overbank and channel, or between left and right overbank, and/or between downstream and current section) o Is there a large difference in cross section shape from the downstream cross section? Look at sections for possible ineffective flow regions is there a case to be made for adding ineffective flow to a section? Look for portions of the cross section where you may have very shallow split flow that would be adding wetter perimeter to a section without adding much cross sectional area. Also look for inappropriate top width transitions. Can flow reasonably contract / expand in the distance between sections? Look at channel stations for each cross section are they consistent from section to section? Look at channel slopes between sections are changes due to localized pools and riffles (or a scour hole) than can/should be ignored? Commonly, cross sections are taken from detailed contour mapping, where the thalweg of the stream is estimated. Since most contour mapping does not reflect elevations under water, stream slopes may not be representative using only mapping data. Enhance the mapping data by taking field channel sections. Try removing the offending cross section does the critical depth go away? Or is it transferred to the next section upstream? Interpolate cross sections

What can be gained or lost by interpolating sections? Interpolation of extra cross sections between two sections is the most common way critical depth problems are solved at the Division of Water. The interpolation routine within HEC-RAS is easy to use (and undo if you have problems). There are items to consider when interpolating: Interpolation should be considered only a mathematical solution to help solve the equations, so dont treat them like real cross sections. Dont use more than a couple (maybe 5 max) interpolated cross sections between any two sections. Too many sections make the model a pain to debug and review, and you reach a point of diminishing returns (if 5 sections dont work, then 50 sections wont work either). Make sure the interpolation looks reasonable. Use judicially only interpolate when necessary. Dont use the interpolation routine within HEC-2. The interpolation parameters are based on flow depth, so differences in depths will give you different interpolated cross sections, making your model inconsistent from run to run.

Page 3 of 4

Are there times when defaulting to critical depth is acceptable? A true hydraulic jump or supercritical flow is rare, given the basic models reviewed or complied by the Division of Water are Larger streams (with a drainage area greater then 1 square mile) Have fairly flat slopes Are modeling the 100 year frequency flood discharge

But if you are looking at modeling a small upland stream, with a steep slope, or a low flow discharge, then it may be reasonable to have mixed or supercritical flow. This is often apparent by a series of cross sections defaulting to critical depth, not just one or two. It is easy to set HEC-RAS to calculate a supercritical or mixed flow profile. Another instance where it might be reasonable to assume critical depth is at some sort of structure that is changing the flow characteristics of a stream. One place that the Division of Water encounters supercritical or mixed flow (legitimately) is for a spillway for a dam. Indeed, the Pressure and Weir solution for a bridge is an assumption of critical depth at the weir; since its not an error its not reported as such. David B. Knipe, PE, CFM Indiana Department of Natural Resources Division of Water dknipe@dnr.state.in.us Version 0.1 February 2003

Page 4 of 4

- SopUploaded byপায়েল পায়েল
- Transient Production ForecastUploaded byImam Zulkifli S
- Vibration and Condition MonitoringUploaded bySwapanbasu
- Rakesh's ResumeUploaded byUmang Duggal
- virtual lab-water qualityUploaded byapi-265481802
- Piping DefinitionUploaded bynike_y2k
- Coal Slurry Production JAPAN[1]Uploaded byApolinario P. Mina
- hecrasUploaded byScooby Skook
- Graduation Audit - Ch400Uploaded byscribd104444
- ChE Presentation for University DaysUploaded byKuo Sarong
- Design of Reclamation VesselUploaded byashish2783
- A036513001.pdfUploaded byEngr.Mohammed Khaled
- Distribuc..Uploaded byÁngel Pérez
- References.pdfUploaded byRaymond Yabut
- 306877301-Flame-Arrestor-Datasheet.pdfUploaded bysudjono
- Flat Flow KitUploaded byNilesh Barange
- 02. Chapter Two - Dimension AnalysisUploaded byMoayad
- Che EngUploaded byAdriana
- u of u engineering personal statementUploaded byapi-255099497
- Rayleigh Tabulated DataUploaded bydavpaff
- new 1Uploaded byJose Luis Meseguer Valdenebro
- B.ING (74-78).docxUploaded byHryyyy
- History of HydrologyUploaded bySlim Slade
- Fam planUploaded byFaye HR
- Preliminary assessment of the presence of emerging pollutants in water used for irrigation in the western Bogota Savanna.pptxUploaded byAndres Cubides Guerrero
- Valvulas de RegulacionUploaded bydaniel
- abreviaturas_unidades_medidaUploaded bygerardo orrantia
- Appendix C-steam Piping SystemsDUploaded byAjay Bhatt
- Subcon Billing - Boac and Torrijos - june 28, 2019.xlsxUploaded bydarwin alejandro
- gouveia1998Uploaded byGembonz Crew Gon'z Speed

- Drainage SystemUploaded byA S Verma
- 315250578 96300592 Design of Sewerage System PptUploaded byShiela Sorino
- 04-06 Erosion Control During ConstructionUploaded byRaizil Aisyaizni
- 2010 Summer Banning RyanUploaded byLeslie Falcon LP
- Chapter 5 - DrainageUploaded byMohammedAlSahari
- Empresas canadienses con permisos chinosUploaded byNelson Vielma
- town council staff reportUploaded byapi-281844000
- Surajpura Water Supply BrochureUploaded bysushil kumar
- July 2002 California Water Conservation NewsUploaded byWatershed Working Group
- Crop Wateruse WatermelonUploaded byMil Lorono
- Directiva Transferencia 008 2018 CONTRALORIAUploaded byDavid Espinoza Laveriano
- ABDIRAHIIM YOUSUF BARRE-FULL ASSIGNMENT.docxUploaded byMohamoud Abdulahi
- 29 Hydro Geochemistry of Sand Pit Lakes at Sepetiba BasinUploaded byCarlos Oliveira
- RiversUploaded byAastha Soni
- hartiUploaded byAlexandru Stan
- GREYWATER TREATMENT IN SAND AND GRAVEL FILTERSUploaded byjacquesjza
- River Channel Processes Landforms 1234591289846057 3Uploaded bywael4000w
- Los Angeles County Community Water Systems: Atlas and Policy Guide Volume I - Supply vulnerabilities, at-risk populations, opportunities for conservationUploaded bySouthern California Public Radio
- LWORA STP Tech detailsUploaded bylaughingwaters
- Toro - Drip Irrigation DIY GuideUploaded byCarrie Barrott
- 1-s2.0-S0143622803000225-main.pdfUploaded byhram_phd
- Final DPR 30.11.2017(1)Uploaded bywapcos.rud
- CE-341 Hydrology Lab Manual FinalUploaded byShubham Bansal
- Sdf ReportUploaded byqinghongzhao1968
- A Tale of Two Basins an Integrated Physical and Biological Perspective of the Deep Arctic Ocean 2015 Progress in OceanographyUploaded byJuan Sebastian Geraldo Escobar
- River Metamorphosis, NeyyarUploaded byDr.Thrivikramji.K.P.
- IntroductionUploaded byAshutoshKumar
- Ch 34 - GPTsUploaded bykktay
- Water Resources of the Lake Traverse Reservation, South and North Dakota, and Roberts Co SDUploaded bySally Jo Sorensen
- Paralic SuccessionsUploaded bypaolafeba