Page 1 of 6 UNIVERSITY OF BATANGAS COLLEGE OF LAW

REMEDIAL LAW REVIEW I (CIVIL PROCEDURE &SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS)

SYLLABUS/METHODOLOGY By: JUDGE ELEUTERIO L. BATHAN

I.

Method of Instruction – The Socratic method of instruction shall be employed which means that there will be recitation-lecture method. There will assignment every meeting the coverage of which will be the coverage of the topics for recitation of the students. The professor will supplement their answers through further discussion of the topic.

Cases Assigned – All cases assigned shall be read in their original, if possible. Grading System - Thirty percent (30%) of the final grade will be the student’s grade in the recitation, assignment, quizzes and long tests. Another 30% will be the midterm grade and the remaining 40% will be the student’s rating in the final examination.

II.

Prescribed Book – The professor will use the book authored by Justice Oscar Herrera entitled Remedial Law. However, the students may refer to other books in Environmental Law by other authors.

III. IV.

3 units 3 hours a week Syllabus

1. Overview of: 1.1 Courts Jurisdictions. 1.1.1 Batas Pambansa Bilang 129 as amended by R.A. 7961 (Sections 1 and 2 amending Sections 19, 32, 33 and 34 of BP 129).

1.1.2 Cases: - Hilario vs. Salvador, G.R. No. 160384, April 29, 2005 - San Roque, Talisay Cebu vs. Heirs of pastor, G.R No. 138896, June 20, 2000 - Russell vs. Vestil, G.R. No. 119347, March 17, 1999 - Heirs of Concha vs. Lumocso, G.R. No. 158121, December 12, 2007 - San Pedro vs. Judge Asdala, G.R. No. 164560, July 22, 2009 - Heirs of Sebe vs. Heirs of Sevilla, G.R. No. 174497, October 12, 2009 - Jimenez vs. Jordana, G.R. No. 152526. November 25, 2004 - Gumabon vs. Larin, 422 Phil. 222; Espeneli vs. Santiago, 107 Phil. 830 - Vda. De Barrera & Oco vs. Legaspi, G.R. No. 174346, September 12, 2008

Page 2 of 6 .Caseñas vs. 155179. 1997 . 204 SCRA 1 .PNCC vs.R. CA. 2005 2. Judicial Affidavit Rule (A. No.Ejercito vs. G. Hon. No. 666 .Jaravata vs. Vargas.R. vs. 101083.Royales vs. 2009 . 1999 . 140973.M.2 Amendment of Complaint. G. 143723.R. No.R.8. et al. 212 Phil. May 21. No.1. 24 August 2007 . 2008 . 1988 . 2008 . No. 12-8-8-SC) 1. No. Rosales.4. 1990 . April 18.5. June 28. Inc. 79 Phil.R.2.R. G. 172217. Rules on Summary Procedure 1. G. July 30. Court of Appeals. Natino. 165433. CA. CA. G.Rebollido vs.Estate of Manantan vs.Agustin vs. March 28.Spouses Cruz vs. G.. CASES: . 1993 . February 6. No. No. Judge Militante. Factoran. G. G.Oposa vs.Laresma vs. G. Aguilar. August 30.R. 89114.Tantuico. 2007 . No.Aquino vs. 63145. 159296.R. G. No. 1989 . 11-6-10-SC) 1.Ma-ao Sugar Central Co.R.2. 2001 .Zamora vs. G. 159482. Alameda. 08-8-7-SC) 1. No. February 18.Bayog vs. CA. No. February 6. 165433. Garcia. March 19.Luna vs. CASES: . Cause of Action. 88 Phil. 432 . No..Madrona vs. Guidelines for Litigation in Quezon City Trial Courts (A.6. Jr. June 13.Virata vs.2. 1990 . Rules of Procedure for Environmental Cases (A. L-27169.Ventura vs.2 Supreme Court Issuances/Administrative Matters 1.2. Aquino.. Spouses Goli-Cruz. IAC. September 26. December 2.. Complaint and Pleading 2.Quinagoran vs.Aguilon vs. Bacalan. MetroBank & Trust Co. Gomba.3. CASE/S: .R. Mirafuente. 2007 . G.Rodriguez vs.7. October 20.3 Parties.R. CASES: .Ledesma vs. 131 SCRA 631 . 96914.Chiang Kai Shek School vs. G. July 23. 145867. April 7.PNCC vs. IAC. G. Abellana. vs. Aure. Personal Capacity vs. No. No. 183 SCRA 279. Bohol.R.R. 160604.Olivas vs. M. No. 135 SCRA . Rules on Procedure for Small Claims Cases (A.1 Cause of Action. 215 . 2009 . January 12. Sandiganbayan. February 10. 2008 . January 12. Barrios.M.PDI vs. 2005 . 106429. No. 145 SCRA 248 . 1977 . No. 1992 2.R. 1990.R.M.Republic Planters Bank vs.2. April 25. vs.R. 81123.M. G.Tenorio vs.Allgemeine Phils. CA. CA. 58028. 1990 . October 5. G. Efficient Use of Paper rule (A. No.2. 54 . G. September 18. No. 1991 . Legal Capacity to Sue.Santos vs. April 10.R. 78343. Republic. Vigan. February 28. 1989 . 285. April 17. CA. vs.2. November 11.R. 09-6-8-SC) 1. G. No. vs. 1994 .2. 19 SCRA 462 . 2004 . 202 SCRA 680 . Rosal. Somera. Delilah Magtolis.R. Katarungang Pambarangay 1.R. Aquino.Community Investment and Finance Corp. 81 Phil.Jakihaca vs. IAC. 1-1-9-4-SC) 1.Jakihaca vs.R. . Judge Flor.M.Salita vs. 2. No. 2006 1. G. 172595.Litonjua Group of Co. No. G.2.

Spouses Chua vs. January 20. 2002 .Kionisala vs. G. Court of Appeals.(Section 7(b)(2). No. No.. No. 129864. PCIB. et al.Republic vs.Page 3 of 6 . G. CA. Publication. Del Rosario. vs. No.United vs. No.R. February 13. Personal. 2008 . G. 147902.BPI vs.Ballatan vs. 174356. S. No.R. No. Chubb and Sons. No. Nos. Rule 141 of the Rules of Court) . No. vs. No. Reyes.R.Sun Insurance vs. July 8. No. February 7. No.R. Basis of Computation. 123340. David. 119657. 1999 . CA. No. March 17. No. 194024. G. G. September 30.Uy vs. Glasglow.Steelcase vs.Go vs.Misamis Occ. CA. G.R.R. 128803. G.R.. 2007 . CA. vs. Court of Appeals. 2007 . 2006 . 2010 (Receivership) 3.R. No. 2001 . 2007 . Filing/Docket Fees. 160053.La Chemise Lacoste. Asuncion.Lorenzo Shipping vs. 1996 . Mosquera. R-II Builders. May 7. 173979. 156187. 175914. et al. January 18. Rosemoore. June 8.Auction in Malinta vs. Court of Appeals.Perkin Elmer vs.R. 214 Phil. Lantion. November 27.Lantin vs.R.Manotoc vs. 110318. CA. 139437.Rivera vs. 147724. Intermediate Appellate Court. 2012 .R.R. February 10. 2008 . February 13. No. March 9.R. TOPROS. Judge Moya. Summons with Provisional Remedies.. G. Foreign Corporations.R. 2004 . 2009 . G.. 159669 & 163521. G. March 1.Gumabon vs. 125683.Chavez vs. CIAC. 2011 . Distinction Properties. June 29. 142313. No. No. G. Santiago. G. April 14. No. 28 Phil 39 . No. G. G. CA.Kapalong vs.Hun Hyung Park vs. et al. UCPB. Padigos.R.R.Arcelona vs. Benelda Estate. Won Choi. No. 171995. OCAMPO. No. October 17. 2001 . G.R. 2005 . November 11.R. vs. CA. Gochuico & Co. 2007 .R.Evanglista..Asiavest Ltd. CA.Nagaño vs. G.R. December 8.R. August 29. G. 152575. 1997 .Rural Bank of Calinog (Iloilo) vs. G. Heirs of Dacut.. 1989 . 173192. Larin. 152430. G. Formaran III. 132848-49. February 12. CA. 136821.Rovels Enterprises vs.R. 2006 . 1987 . 250 . No. No. No. G. No. Summons. 1998 .Langkaan Realty vs.Manchester vs. August 28.Dacoycoy vs. G.R.R. No. CASES: .Bacalso vs.Ruby Shelter vs.R. G. April 29. August 28.Fil-Estate Golf vs. Fernandez. L-75919. April 25. 1988 .R.R.R. 332 . G. 783 5. September 25. No. August 29. 2005 . 2006 4. vs. No. II Coop.Cruz vs. Dakila. March 12.Go vs.Velasco & Co. Cases . February 12..Home Guaranty vs.R. No.Unimasters Conglomeration vs.A. 152808. March 2. 155408. . G. 123231. 129928. G. 2007 . No. Nos.R.R. G.R. 490 SCRA 168 (TRO) . Inc. 494 SCRA 535 Venue of Action – Real vs.Vivares vs. 147379. Summons vs. 172242. No.R. 192649.Columbia Pictures. G. 2004 . 2000 . No. August 14. 2007 6. G. 27 February 2002 . March 22. G. G.R.R. Design International. G. CA. vs. 170281. Nos. 79937-38. 2000 . CA.R. G. 2008 . 130974. CASES: . April 18. G. Navarro.R.Rosete vs. vs. 2001 . G. 2005 . August 25. 345 Phil. 2002 . 195 SCRA 641 . Substituted. Cases .Philrock.Spouses Yu vs.Magsasaka vs.R. UCPB. 146519. August 16. G. L-41322. G. 464 Phil. September 29. 165496. 2005 . 157447. 2012 . Luyaben. No. No. G. Provisional Remedies. No. Personal. June 26. 17 November 1997 .Chua vs. 142523. G.

144190. No. Garcia. 2012 10.R. August 20. Sandiganbayan. 2005 . 1992 11.Pacquing vs. L-35701.5 CASES: Ocampo vs. Bonto. No.Page 4 of 6 7. CTA. No. CA. Carpio. May 30. 134854. 1962 9. 166216. G. ORDERS. January 18. No.R. Philippine Trust. G. L-29766. CASES: 8. Chua Tay. September 11. CA. L-48564.Trocio vs. 139371. Its effect: CASES: BA Finance Corporation. March 14. Nos.. 4 SCRA 160 8.Aberca. March 16. CA. G. Traders Royal Bank. December 28. G. 251 SCRA 556 (1995) .. No. 2012 Delos Santos vs. March 6. G.R. G.R. Buenaventura. Preliminary Conference / Pre-Trial Conference. Court of Appeals. G.DBP vs. 134854. Notice of Dismissal of Action. 200 Phil. 2006 Mercader vs. CASES: .R.Dalton vs. No. 169-170.Permanent Concrete vs. MOTIONS. Court of Appeals..Son vs. No. 169 SCRA 409. et al. vs.R. G. 1979 Akut vs. 224 SCRA 163 Strongworld vs. 2006 Obando vs.4 Motion to Dismiss on Prescription. G. 215 Ker & Co.Africa vs. G. Court of Appeals. 166216. No. August 14. vs. NOTICES. 1973 .1 Motion to Dismiss on Lack of Jurisdiction. 1990 . et al. Figueras. 307 SCRA 460 .. Labayo. Motions 8. G. et al.R. 151098. vs. Consolacion. 153696. SERIVCE OF PLEADINGS. No.R. September 19. 73 SCRA 208 Obando vs. March 21. 5 SCRA 163. CASES: .. vs. No. No. JUDGMENTS AND OTHER PAPERS. January 18. No. G. 149580. G.R. 2000 Community Investment vs. April 4.R. No. DEFAULT. 55 SCRA 267 Quiaoit vs. 2002 . 2000 Matela vs.Interlining vs. 1999 . 88954. DECLARATION OF DEFAULT. 317 SCRA 264 . 109430-43. Son. 201 Phil. No. 680 Indiana Aerospace University vs. Figueras. 1994 Gajudo vs. 2001 Rep. CASES: 8. July 27. 88 Phil. 117385.3 Motion to Dismiss on Res Judicata. March 14.Tinio vs.2 Motion to Dismiss on Lack of Cause of Action. Perrello. Ver.R.R. No. Teodoro. 1968 . October 29.. .Abubakar vs.R. IAC. CASES: 8. 2006 Mangelen vs. No. et al. ANSWER. 516 8. 148026. ..BPI vs.R. CHED.R. G. November 29. CASES: Aberca. 76372. G. Ver. February 11. Abubakar. Manzano.

2007 . Revival of Judgment: .1.Orbeta vs.L.R. 139868. Court of Appeals. 140984. 377 Phil. 153 SCRA 592 . Bitanga.Grande vs. Guersey-Dalaygon. G.R. 2006 . 159222. February 18. 142594.R. 169177.Mercado vs Security Bank.Antonio vs.Public Estates Authority vs. 2006 . 1990 De Guia vs. 2006 .R. May 5.5 Annulment of Judgment. No. September 5. No.R.Ancheta vs. 514. No. G.Martinez vs.R. Gateway Corporation. G. September 15.Heirs of Samper vs. G.R. 2006 15. 128686. February 19. April 4.Vide Hermoso v.People vs. No.R. June 20. No. No.R. 2006 . G. PILHINO. No. Middleton. Republic. CASES: . 148456.R. Judgment: 15. Calilung.R. 2001 Tiu vs. Post Decision Remedies 15. “G” Holdings. G. No. No.Republic vs.3 Motion For Reconsideration. No.2 15. February 6. Execution. CA. Sendiong. 2006 16. Inc. June 8. 2001 .Tan vs. 145254. G. 2005 .Page 5 of 6 9.4 Petition for Relief from Judgment .166849. C. (1997).R. G. 2006 . G.R. No.R. Bahia vs. G. 2006 . G. Inc.Knecht. G. Guersey-Dalaygon.R.R. Reciproco-Noble. YUJUICO. De Guia. July 31.R. No. 336 Phil. G.Juani vs. 2001 15. No. TRIAL: 13. G. 44980. Realty Corporation. No. G. No. 135384. March 19.Solid Bank v.1 15. 2006 . 463 SCRA 180 . 140615. G.February 6. No. 94457. March 18. Mercado. Paguirigan vs. 310 SCRA 580 Modes of Discovery.R. 178672. 2005 . 139868. No. 2004 Sps. No.R. No. No. 155236. G. vs. G. CASES: .Republic vs. Appeal . 160895. June 26.Espinosa v. Sison. Cainta.Mercado vs. November 22. 1991 . No. 2006 Morahay vs.. October 30. 160445. 141241. CA. CASES: Motion For New Trial.Salonga vs. 2009 . UP. 2005. G.R. December 13.Ancheta v. 1987 . July 20. No. Court of Appeals. Third Party Claim. G. Alarcon. 2005 . 482 . No. G.Magno vs. R. G. G. G. May 28. 140486. June 30. June 26. June 08. 142464.Joven vs. 157194. April 2008 12.R. 2004 . February 16. Mosquera. September 26. vs.Legarda vs.Dela Cruz vs. July 8. Melicor. 153432. Intervention 14.R. 140319. 2007 .APEX Mining. Court of Appeals.R. Court of Appeals.58781. . CA. Sandiganbayan.

Court of Appeals. December 14. 137391. G. Rule 65 Procedure in the Supreme Court Procedure in the Court of Appeals Contempt In case of need – Should the student find it necessary to see the professor. 96 SCRA 69 17. September 3. 117 Phil. 21. No.Bien vs. 2003 .Lancita vs.Republic vs. IAC.Filipinas Investment Finance Corporation vs. CASE/S: . 2001 .R.Laperal vs. 2010 18. L-43179.R. G. 117 SCRA 249 .Carbonilla vs. Sunga. No. 77637. 179 SCRA 728 . Abiera.R. De los Angeles.Enriquez vs. 19. 140652. No.R. Expropriation.Torralba vs. V. 20. G. 1985 . the latter can be contacted at (02) 924-41-80.Page 6 of 6 . 39 . Ocampo. No. June 27. Magbanua. July 26. Court of Appeals. . G.

Master your semester with Scribd & The New York Times

Special offer for students: Only $4.99/month.

Master your semester with Scribd & The New York Times

Cancel anytime.