You are on page 1of 1

9 //

ADVERTISEMENT
KERCHNER et al vs. Obama & Congress et al
Obama’s father was not a U.S. citizen nor was he even an immigrant to the USA.
A historic lawsuit to protect the eligibility standards of President, they violated plaintiffs’ Constitutional AND QUALIFIED TO BE PRESIDENT AND RIGHT UNDER THE TENTH AMENDMENT TO
for the office of the President and Commander-in- rights under the Twentieth Amendments by failing COMMANDER IN CHIEF THEREOF COMPEL OBAMA TO SATISFY HIS ARTICLE
Chief of the military which includes suing Congress on behalf of the plaintiffs and other concerned II CONSTITUTIONAL BURDEN OF PROVING
for its many counts of violations of Constitutional Americans as their elected representatives to properly COUNT III begins on page 43: THROUGH OBJECTIVE, CREDIBLE, AND
protections guaranteed by that contract between vet and verify pursuant to their Constitutional (Fifth Amendment-Substantive Due Process v. Obama) SUFFICIENT PROOF THAT HE WAS BORN IN
“We the People” and our federal government. It also obligation under the Twentieth Amendment, Section DEFENDANT OBAMA VIOLATED PLAINTIFFS’ THE UNITED STATES AND THAT HE IS AN
includes a historic Quo Warranto count petitioning 3 whether Obama was born in the United States and FIFTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS BY DEPRIVING ARTICLE II, “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN” AS
that the usurper President be asked “by what is an Article II “natural born Citizen” so as to meet THEM OF A LIBERTY INTEREST WITHOUT THAT TERM SHALL BE DEFINED BY THE
authority” have you proved that you are eligible and that provision’s citizenship eligibility requirements to SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS OF LAW BY JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT
qualified under Article II of the Constitution to serve be President and to allow and to continue to allow COMMENCING AND CONTINUING THE
in the office of President and Commander-in-Chief. Obama to occupy the Office of President even though OCCUPATION OF THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT COUNT IX begins on page 57:
This lawsuit was filed 2:50 a.m. in the morning prior he is not qualified to be President under Article II WHILE REFUSING TO HONOR THEIR (Tenth Amendment-Rights Reserved v. Non-Obama
to the inaugauration on January 20th, 2009. This is a because he is not a “natural born Citizen.” REQUESTS PURSUANT TO ARTICLE II THAT HE Defendant)
constitutional legal matter that must be resolved in 26. By so failing and given that the non-Obama PROVE THROUGH CREDIBLE, OBJECTIVE, AND PLAINTIFFS HAVE THE CONSTITUTIONAL
the courts in order to support and defend the U.S. defendants with much less public demands and SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE THAT HE WAS BORN RIGHT UNDER THE TENTH AMENDMENT TO
Constitution from further erosion of its authority grievances,fullyinvestigated,authorizedlegalscholars IN THE UNITED STATES AND IS AN ARTICLE II COMPEL THE NON-OBAMA DEFENDANTS TO
as the supreme law of the land. No one, not even a to conduct legal research and to present their findings “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN” THEREOF CONDUCT APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL
President Elect, a President, or the Congress is above in the form of a legal opinion, held public hearings HEARINGS UNDER THE TWENTIETH
that law on the question of whether Republican Presidential COUNT IV begins on page 46: AMENDMENT TO DETERMINE IF OBAMA IS
candidate John McCain is an Article II “natural born (Fifth Amendment-Substantive Due Process v. Non- ARTICLE II QUALIFIED TO BE PRESIDENT
You can read the entire lawsuit Complaint in its Citizen” and eligible to be President, and even passed Obama Defendants) UNDER THE STANDARD TO BE ESTABLISHED
entirety at SCRIBD.com at this link: http://www. Senate Resolution 511 proclaiming that McCain is THE NON-OBAMA DEFENDANTS VIOLATED BY A COURT AND IF HE DOES NOT SO
scribd.com/doc/11317148/ an Article II “natural born Citizen,” defendants also PLAINTIFFS’ FIFTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS BY QUALIFY TO REMOVE HIM FROM OFFICE AND
deprived the plaintiffs of procedural due process and DEPRIVING THEM OF A LIBERTY INTEREST REPLACE HIM PURSUANT TO APPLICABLE
Civil Action No. 1:09-cv-00253 filed in federal court equal protection under the Fifth Amendment in failing WITHOUT SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS OF CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS
in NJ: to utilize, on their behalf as their democratically LAW BY ALLOWING OBAMA TO COMMENCE
elected representatives and through whom plaintiffs AND CONTINUE THE OCCUPATION OF THE COUNT X begins on page 60:
Plaintiffs: speak and assert their constitutional rights, the same OFFICE OF PRESIDENT WHILE REFUSING TO (Twentieth Amendment-Congress to Qualify
Charles F. Kerchner, Jr, : procedure they used to investigate McCain and to HONOR THEIR REQUESTS UNDER ARTICLE President Elect v. Non-Obama Defendants)
Lowell T. Patterson, : also use the Constitutional and statutory procedure II AND THE TWENTIETH AMENDMENT THAT GIVEN PLAINTIFFS’ AND OTHER CONCERNED
Darrell James LeNormand, and : that exists under the 20th Amendment and 3 U.S.C. THEY ADEQUATELY CONFIRM WHETHER AMERICANS’ PETITIONS TO THE NON-OBAMA
Donald H. Nelsen, Jr., : Sec.15, respectively, for the purpose of conclusively OBAMA WAS BORN IN THE UNITED STATES DEFENDANTSTOADDRESSTHEIR GRIEVANCES
verifying that President-Elect Obama was born in the AND THAT HE IS AN ARTICLE II “NATURAL REGARDING WHETHER OR NOT OBAMA IS
Defendants: United States and he is an Article II “natural born BORN CITIZEN” THEREOF AN ARTICLE II “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN”
Barack Hussein Obama II, President Elect : Citizen” and otherwise constitutionally qualified for AND QUALIFIED TO BE PRESIDENT AND
of the United States of America, President : that office and in failing to treat plaintiffs the same as COUNT V begins on page 49: COMMANDER IN CHIEF OFTHE UNITED STATES,
of the United States of America, : they treated other similarly situated members of the (Fifth Amendment-Equal Protection v. Non-Obama THE NON-OBAMA DEFENDANTS VIOLATED
and Individually, a/k/a Barry Soetoro; : public who had expressed their concerns for whether Defendants) PLAINTIFFS’ RIGHTS UNDER THE TWENTIETH
United States of America; : McCain was an Article II “natural born Citizen.” THE NON-OBAMA DEFENDANTS VIOLATED AMENDMENT BY FAILING TO CONDUCT AN
United States Congress; : 27. By way of mandamus, plaintiffs seek a court order PLAINTIFFS’ FIFTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS APPROPRIATE INVESTIGATION AND HEARING
United States Senate; : compelling the non-Obama defendants to adequately BY DENYING THEM EQUAL PROTECTION OF THEREUNDER ON WHETHER OBAMA IS AN
United States House of Representatives; : investigate and hold Congressional hearings under THE LAWS IN REFUSING AND FAILING TO ARTICLE II “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN” TO
Richard B. Cheney, President of : the Twentieth Amendment on the question of whether EXERCISE THEIR GENERAL INVESTIGATORY ASSURE THEM THAT HE IS QUALIFIED TO BE
the Senate, Presiding Officer of Joint : defendant Obama was born in the United States and AND TWENTIETH AMENDMENT POWERS TO PRESIDENT AND COMMANDER IN CHIEF OF
Session of Congress, Vice President of the : is an Article II “natural born Citizen” and otherwise PROTECT PLAINTIFFS BY AFFORDING THEM THE UNITED STATES
United States and Individually; and : qualified to be President under that Article. AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD THROUGH
Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House and : 28. This action in the form of mandamus is brought THEIR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES, AND COUNT XI begins on page 65:
Individually, : against defendant Obama to compel him to prove BY REFUSING AND FAILING TO CONDUCT (Quo Warranto v. Obama)
that he was born in the United States, that he is AN APPROPRIATE INVESTIGATION, LEGAL BECAUSE OBAMA IS NOT AN ARTICLE II
Descriptions and brief information about the Parties an Article II “natural born Citizen,” and that he RESEARCH, AND PUBLIC HEARINGS “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN,” THE COURT
to the action begins on page 3 of the Complaint. is Constitutionally eligible to hold the Office of ON WHETHER OBAMA IS AN ARTICLE II SHOULD REMOVE AND EXCLUDE HIM FROM
President and Commander in Chief. “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN” AND QUALIFIED THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT WHICH HE
An excerpt of the Introduction in the Complaint 29. This action in the form of declaration of rights and TO BE PRESIDENT AND COMMANDER IN PRESENTLY HOLDS AND PERMANENTLY BAR
begins on page 6 and some parts of that are printed quo warranto is brought for the Court to declare that CHIEF OF THE UNITED STATES WHEN THEY HIM FROM HOLDING THAT OFFICE
here: Obama is not Article II qualified to hold the Office of DID PROVIDE SUCH PROTECTION TO OTHER
19. “Governments are instituted among men, deriving President and Commander in Chief and therefore that SIMILARLY SITUATED CONCERNED CITIZENS COUNT XII beginson page 68:
their just powers from the consent of the governed.” the non-Obama defendants removed and permanently WHO EXPRESSED THE SAME CONCERN (Declaratory Action v. All Defendants)
ENDNOTE 7. barred him from that Office. REGARDING PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE THE COURT SHOULD DECLARE THE RIGHTS
20. Under our Constitutional Republic form of JOHN MCCAIN’S ARTICLE II “NATURAL BORN OF THE PLAINTIFFS AND THE DEFENDANTS
democratic government which adheres to the rule THE COUNTS: CITIZENSHIP” STATUS AND QUALIFICATIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THE QUESTION
of law, not even the President Elect, President, or TO BE PRESIDENT OF WHETHER OBAMA IS AN ARTICLE II
Congress is above the law. ENDNOTE 8. COUNT I begins on page 37: “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN” AND WHETHER
21. No court of the United States has ever decided (First Amendment-Abridged Right to Petition the COUNT VI begins on page 52: THE NON-OBAMA DEFENDANTS ARE TO BE
the merits of any legal action against a Presidential Government v. Non-Obama Defendants) (Ninth Amendment-Rights Reserved v. Obama) COMPELLED TO HOLD CONGRESSIONAL

MONDAY, JUNE 15, 2009 // THE WASHINGTON TIMES


candidate, President Elect, or sitting President THE NON-OBAMA DEFENDANTS VIOLATED PLAINTIFFS HAVE THE CONSTITUTIONAL HEARING ON THE QUESTION OF WHETHER
challenging his eligibility to be President based on PLAINTIFF KERCHNER’S RIGHTS UNDER THE RIGHT UNDER THE NINTH AMENDMENT TO OBAMA IS AN ARTICLE II “NATURAL BORN
the “natural born Citizen” requirement of Article II FIRST AMENDMENT BY ABRIDGING HIS RIGHTS COMPEL OBAMA TO SATISFY HIS ARTICLE CITIZEN” AS THAT TERM WILL BE DEFINED
Section 1 of the United States Constitution. TO PETITION HIS GOVERNMENT FOR A REDRESS II CONSTITUTIONAL BURDEN OF PROVING BY THE COURT AND IF THEY DETERMINE
22. To date, no state or federal election official, nor OF GRIEVANCES WHEN THEY UNJUSTIFIABLY THROUGH OBJECTIVE, CREDIBLE, AND THAT HE IS NOT THAT THEY EXERCISE
any government authority, has investigated or held FAILEDTOADDRESSAND IGNORED PLAINTIFF’S SUFFICIENT PROOF THAT HE WAS BORN IN THEIR POWERS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION
hearings and verified that Obama ever established and PETITIONS TO THEM TO INVESTIGATE THE UNITED STATES AND THAT HE IS AN TO REMOVE HIM FROM THE OFFICE OF
proved conclusively that he is an Article II “natural WHETHER OR NOT OBAMA IS AN ARTICLE II ARTICLE II, “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN” AS PRESIDENT AND REPLACE HIM
born Citizen.” “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN” AND QUALIFIED TO THAT TERM SHALL BE DEFINED BY THE
23. Plaintiffs have filed this action against the non- BE PRESIDENT AND COMMANDER IN CHIEF OF JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT PRAYER FOR RELIEF requested of the court
Obama defendants for their violation of plaintiffs’ THE UNITED STATES regarding the Defendant Obama begins on page 69.
First Amendment right not to have their right to COUNT VII begins on page 53:
petition their government abridged by their failure COUNT II begins on page 39: (Ninth Amendment-Rights Reserved v. Non-Obama PRAYER FOR RELIEF requested of the court regarding
to address their First Amendment petitions and (Fifth Amendment-Procedural Due Process v. Non- Defendant) the No-Obama Defendants begins on page 72.
grievances filed with them regarding Obama’s Article Obama Defendants) PLAINTIFFSHAVETHECONSTITUTIONALRIGHT
II eligibility to be President. THE NON-OBAMA DEFENDANTS VIOLATED UNDER THE NINTH AMENDMENT TO COMPEL Read the whole case at SCRIBD.com: http://www.
24. Plaintiffs are also filing and seeking remedies PLAINTIFFS’ FIFTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS THE NON-OBAMA DEFENDANTS TO CONDUCT scribd.com/doc/11317148/
under the Fifth Amendment for the non-Obama BY DEPRIVING THEM OF A LIBERTY APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL HEARINGS
defendants’ denying them a liberty interest without INTEREST WITHOUT PROCEDURAL DUE UNDER THE TWENTIETH AMENDMENT TO For more details about the case, and writings about
procedural due process of law, depriving them a PROCESS OF LAW BY FAILING UNDER DETERMINE IF OBAMA ISARTICLE II QUALIFIED Article II Eligibility for the office of the Presidency
liberty interest without substantive due process of THE PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES OF TO BE PRESIDENT UNDER THE STANDARD TO and Commander-in-Chief of our military, and/or how
law, depriving them of equal protection of the law THE TWENTIETH AMENDMENT AND BE ESTABLISHED BY THE COURT AND IF HE you can help if you wish to help, contact:
under the Fifth Amendment, and for their violation 3 U.S.C. 15 TO AFFORD PLAINTIFFS AN DOES NOT SO QUALIFY TO REMOVE HIM FROM
of plaintiffs’ constitutional rights under the Ninth and OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD THROUGH THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT AND REPLACE HIM Attorney Mario Apuzzo
Tenth Amendment. THEIR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES AND PURSUANT TO APPLICABLE CONSTITUTIONAL 185 Gatzmer Avenue
25. This action is brought against the non-Obama BY FAILING TO CONDUCT AN APPROPRIATE PROVISIONS Jamesburg NJ 08831
defendants because, in light of the great public outcry CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATION AND Phone: 732-521-1900
and plaintiffs’ petitions for redress of grievances HEARING ON WHETHER OBAMA WAS BORN COUNT VIII begins on page 56: Fax: 732-521-3906
regarding whether Obama is an Article II “natural IN THE UNITED STATES AND WHETHER HE (Tenth Amendment-Power reserved v. Obama) Email: apuzzo@erols.com
born Citizen” and otherwise qualified for the office IS AN ARTICLE II “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN” PLAINTIFFS HAVE THE CONSTITUTIONAL Blog/Website: http://puzo1.blogspot.com