You are on page 1of 4

Forensic Magazine® | Articles | Dead Reckoning

Dead Reckoning
Douglas Page
Summer 2004

Criminal foul play and medical malpractice often go undiscovered unless post-exhumation autopsy is
performed. Declining autopsy rates is the likely culprit. In the years following World War II, about half
of all hospital deaths were routinely autopsied. Now the number is under 10 percent, mostly because
autopsies are costly and not generally reimbursable. In addition, hospitals and physicians fear
malpractice litigation could result from autopsy findings that conflict with conclusions on the death

A recent university study found that forensic exhumations frequently are successful in discovering
inconsistencies in cause of death as determined by authorities at the time of death. The study, which
appeared in the April 2004 issue of the International Journal of Legal Medicine, found that major
deviations between the cause of death as stated on the death certificate and as diagnosed after
autopsy existed in nearly 40 percent of forensic exhumations performed in Münster, Germany. The
percentage of misdiagnoses may be even higher.

"The real number of undetected homicides is difficult to estimate, but the cases reported definitely
represent just the tip of the iceberg,” according to the study's lead author, Bernd Karger, MD, Institute
of Legal Medicine at the University of Münster.

One reason for so many buried homicides is the local system of postmortem examination, where
every physician in Germany is bound by law to externally examine a corpse and to fill out the death
certificate. “But many physicians lack knowledge and experience, and perhaps even interest, in
thanatology to perform postmortem examinations according to established standards,” Karger said.

Low Autopsy Rate

Another reason for undiscovered crime is the low autopsy rate. Only 1.2 to 1.4 percent of all fatalities
in the Münster area are autopsied by a specialist in legal medicine, compared to 3.4 percent in Munich
and 20 percent in the U.S. Approximately one-fifth of the 2.4 million deaths in the U.S. each year are
investigated by medical examiners and coroners, accounting for approximately 450,000 medico-legal
death investigations annually, according to the Institute of Medicine. The lower German autopsy rate
equates, then, to higher exhumations.

Karger's study reports on a total of 155 exhumations performed from 1967 to 2001, each evaluated (1 of 4)6/12/2009 3:04:46 PM

Forensic Magazine® | Articles | Dead Reckoning

retrospectively on the basis of autopsy report, police report, and death certificate. Histology and
toxicology were performed in most cases. Postmortem intervals varied from 8 days to 8 years.

“The cause of death could be clearly determined in 103 cases (66.5 percent) and histology or
toxicology was decisive in 40 percent,” Karger said.

Some findings were discernable using immunohistochemistry after considerable postmortem intervals,
such as acute myocardial infarction after one year and pneumonia after two years. A diazepam
intoxication was determined after 4.5 years.

Major deviations between cause of death as stated on the death certificate and as diagnosed after
autopsy existed in 57 cases, or 37 percent. Karger concluded that exhumations were frequently
successful for recovering evidence which should better have been collected immediately after the
death of the individual. Further, exhumations can also be regarded as an instrument to evaluate the
quality of death certificates and death investigations, he said.

In Perspective

Any research that shows that nearly 40 percent of exhumations expose a wrongful cause of death
may at first read like an indictment of medical examination practices. But the study must be read in
proper light.

“The authors state that few autopsies are performed in their area, thus exhumations are more frequent
and therefore more useful,” said Dr. Moses S. Schanfield, chair of the Department of Forensic
Sciences, The George Washington University.

The U.S., with its system of medical examiners and coroners, is different. Most states require that all
unattended deaths, as well as suspicious deaths, be autopsied, which does not appear to be the case
in Münster.

“The results of the Karger study are not surprising as almost all of the autopsies (146 of 155, or 94
percent) were ordered by the courts or prosecutors. Thus, there appeared to be some prior basis of
untoward death,” Schanfield said.

Modern Equipment

The craft of autopsy - practiced by humans for 2,400 years and modernized by Germans in the 19th
century - may itself be dying. The percentage of autopsies has fallen dramatically in the U.S. over the
last half century.

In the 1950s, nearly half of all patients who died in U.S. hospitals were autopsied. Now it varies
between 5 percent and 13 percent, due in large part to restricted hospital budgets and modern
imaging techniques like CT and MRI scanners, which are believed to be so proficient at picturing
internal pathology that invasive procedures are no longer as necessary. (2 of 4)6/12/2009 3:04:46 PM

Forensic Magazine® | Articles | Dead Reckoning

While exhumations may be rare in the U.S., it is not unusual for any domestic autopsy to find
inaccuracies in the stated cause of death. “You could write an article about doing 155 consecutive
autopsies at Presbyterian Hospital in New York City, or at the UCLA Medical Center, and the answer
would be about one-third of the time the autopsy would find the wrong diagnosis stated on the death
certificate,” said celebrated pathologist Michael Baden, MD, Chief Medical Examiner for the New York
State Police, and New York City's Chief Medical Examiner from 1961-1986.

Even with the aid of modern imaging modalities like CT and MRI, autopsies will find missed significant
diagnosis in 30-40 percent of cases, Baden said.

Final Cut

Exhumation autopsies are normally only performed in the U.S. when issues of medico-legal
significance arise. “I don't know how they missed that many homicides in Münster,” Baden said. “To
miss children who've been battered, injuries from blows from beer bottles, and gunshot wounds that
were not identified indicates that the bodies were poorly examined to begin with.”

Baden said that would be unusual in this country, because if there is any thought of homicide then an
autopsy is performed before burial. There are exceptions, however. Exhumation autopsies are done
on suspected serial deaths, such as when several babies die in one family, when a husband has a
number of wives die mysteriously, or one nurse is the common denominator in an inordinate number
of hospital deaths.

“When the first baby suffocates or the first spouse is poisoned, you don't know that,” Baden said. “But
after a series of deaths then we may do exhumations because of the suspicion that's raised that was
not present when the first death occurred.” In other cases, a second, later, autopsy may be beneficial.

“Even when a body has been previously autopsied, it is still possible to find lots of information that
was missed during the first one,” Baden said. Baden used the example of civil rights leader Medgar
Evers, who was shot in the back in 1963, a few weeks before President Kennedy was murdered. “It
took 30 years and an exhumation of Evers’ remains 28 years after death to gather enough evidence to
go to trial and convict the shooter,” Baden said.

Medical examiners, however, are not in the business of solving murders. The role of the medical
examiner is to determine what happened, not who did it. The body contains a wealth of information,
even 28 years after burial. It took 30 years to get further information that led to the conviction of Byron
De La Beckwith in the Evers matter.

“A second autopsy can pick up information that's focused, when you know what you're looking for,
because you now have more information than at the time of the first autopsy,” stated Baden.
Exhumations can be helpful because traces of most poisonous drugs can be found in the body long
after death. “That's one of the reasons we do exhumations here, because poisons weren't properly
tested for,” Baden said.

Lack of Standards (3 of 4)6/12/2009 3:04:46 PM

Forensic Magazine® | Articles | Dead Reckoning

Many believe we'd have a better chance of proper testing if standards were established. Steve Nunez,
program manager in the University of New Mexico Office of the Medical Investigator, is another expert
not shocked at the Karger findings. “Given the system of postmortem examination described in the
German jurisdiction during the time period cited, the findings are not that surprising,” said Steve

Some standards for proper death scene investigation and examination of remains do exist. However,
death investigation in any given political jurisdiction only as good as the laws that require and define it,
and the expertise, infrastructure, and financial resources provided to manage it, Nunez said.

One purpose the Karger study may serve is to illustrate the need for more stringent forensic pathology
standards for determining time of death, methods of performing autopsies, and how tests are
performed. Baden believes there should be an attempt to get international standards so that all
forensic pathologists proceed in a similar manner in a given type of investigation.

“While uniform standards might be hard to establish, it's important that the crime scene be
investigated properly, with a search for trace evidence, then a standardized autopsy be conducted,
with proper toxicology tests,” Baden said.

Those steps could be developed into international standards, just as hospital conducted, non forensic
autopsy procedures have been standardized, he said. Most forensic and medico-legal experts agree
that some standardization policies need to be established.

Copyright © 2009 Vicon Publishing, Inc. (4 of 4)6/12/2009 3:04:46 PM