This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
OUTLINING SOME BIG BENEFITS OF OUR BC-MMAR PROGRAM
OPENING PREMISE ON INTERNET SECURITY FOR OUR BC-MMAR MEMBERS: All the activities that are done 'by a provider' [as in - in one dispensary or grow-op] will be done on hard wired intranet notebooks with all other inter-communication cards stripped from all computers, in order to insure privacy of the member and business totally isolated from any on-line computer. . Why notebooks – they are really cheap and don't need power for up to a day after a power loss – All sensitive info on the provider intranet will simply be blocked from being transferred into a daily report that's put to a card, and this report-card is sent by an internet computer controlled by the provider and all internet activity will be double encrypted. EDAs are not like franchises and frankly are autonomous, but by its nature must communicate with other EDAs – Without this once daily report, orders cannot transfer from the dispensary to the grower for example. And we agree that leaving the cloud /internet link open all the time is problematic, – so the solution is to start each day with a fresh set of data, with all bill /account info current One reason for a central data at Quadra EDA is someone needs to monitor /insure that all cloud transmission were sent and received, and follow up on why a report was not sent. This is covered under what anyone would expect from any logistics systems provider ON THE CORNERSTONE OF KEEPING PRIVACY AND SECURITY OF THE PATIENT/MEMBER : The Quadra EDA issues the member #, on a card with a electronic chip and this # will be the same on any ID card that any provider offers and in this way if/when this member appears at another provider means this member can get an easy ID check by this interim provider by just checking the picture on the ID data file at Quadra, on an encrypted internet computer and frankly [on this transaction] that's all Quadra needs to know or provide is confirmation of ID] – This is because, once the provider scans the member's card, that provider sees what's on the card; AND in order to guarantee privacy, this card holds only a fraction of the info on the member [like] the last 3 transactions made by the card – and the balance on account, etc.. – If a member wants to give more info can be done, by this member becoming a member of this club too, and then the original provider will deliver access to all the private medical data – the #1 reason for tracking the sales [aka – thru a trafficker] with a number is to insure that the provider is properly collecting [PST] party sales tax on each and every member, and all accounting is done effortlessly by just entering the sale into the system. – [this is by definition a form of accounting 'security'] – In order to be compliant with Elections Canada [in order to collect taxes] we must follow proper accounting on each member in order to remit taxes under the Income Tax Act, and without our Logenics program it would be a bureaucratic nightmare to administer BUT with our system, it will take a few hours per quarterly report for an EDA to administer. – IMAGINE THAT: every EDA [provider] is guaranteed to be compliant with the Tax Act if he gives the member a tax-receipt for his purchases that he can deduct from his taxes. AND – because the provider is operating as a Co-op means, that: what would normally go as taxes on a regular business, goes as dividends to the members of that Co-op /EDA – SIDE BAR: As the whole system unfolds, it usually results in what the Longley experiment showed: No one believed it can be that easy to benefit from taxes by working in the system THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF HOW THE MEMBER IS SERVED [during the transition period] – First – this member needs a new card issued [for new member's follow your present rules] – For existing members, a provider can issue a new card with just basic information by using the MMPR as a guideline in order to ask the member on a question form if he uses 1.1/2 ozs. a month [which i agree is an 'on average' amount used by a member] or if they use less than half that or 1.1/2 ozs per 2-weeks. This will give sufficient and i suspect a good enough general idea of how many lights a provider needs. – Obviously you'd like more info than that; it's like asking them to pick from Santa's list [but] the math on a mean average of 1.1/2oz per month per member, means you need 1/5th of one light's production AND that's 180-to-220 lights for every 1000 members
This math is sufficient to start issuing licenses to growers and this crude starting point becomes irrelevant after just one crop cycle BECAUSE Every time a member order from the exiting inventory means this sale justifies the reason why the grower needs to move clones from the nursery to a vegging room. These new orders actually set the growers' schedules and all of his activity is actually prescribed by law. Furthermore, the patterns created by this data entry become more accurate each time the members' buy more AND our Logenics program prides itself at being the best in this 'thinking' process - Within 6 months of operating, [2 crop cycles] the program will give you great advice to the provider(s) as to what to order, and the data is set for asking questions like: what if this happened? And get real good answers.
[SIDE BAR with prejudice under protest] with this basic math - under the MMPR program – a grower pays $300K for a 1-year fee for a 50-light grow-op – 50 lights produce 50 lbs of bud X 4 crop cycles = 200 lbs THAT MEANS: if the grower did grow all 200 lbs means his fee [per lb] is $1500. This fee is paid up front before the grower gets a dime. Death Canada says the base price of 1-lb under the MMPR will be about $1500. [This $1500. [on average] is about the same price as today's wholesale price] This means Death Canada is actually doubling the wholesale price. This will result in a 100% increase in the price; by definition this is extortion. Why anyone would want to walk into a deal like that is insane; and i can sight lots of examples where the MMPR program is insane. LET's ADD INSULT ONTO INJURY: This fee does NOT go to any 'body' but to Death Canada, who [under international obligations] are compensating for the loses that HC's Harmaceutical industry bosses will loose in profits, from this competition, BECAUSE under the NAFTA agreement any foreign corporation in Canada can sue Canada for lost profits, if the people are allowed /permitted to violate our NAFTA 'obligation' to pay for any losses that any foreign corporation 'suffers' if we [the people] violate [for example] any international treaty that says prohibition must be enforced. AND in a civil court, all we have to do is show that we have a better program than the MMPR, and no judge can shut any provider who is compliant with being 'innocent until proven guilty after a fair and impartial trial' [Sec 13 Charter right] and it's impossible to find anyone guilty who is inside our program, under Freedom to Contract under common law - and anyone who thinks they can scam off this BC-MMAR program will find that they have no such right to operate outside our program without facing charges by the [Sec 15 CC] corporate occupiers of Canada
THE BOTTOM LINE CORNERSTONE OF THE PRESCRIPTION SYSTEM IS: With this system, every time a member buys herb means they are automatically prescribing the need to have that much herb ready in the next crop cycle. [aka – every sale is an order that needs to be repeated, which means a prescribed number of clones can be moved from the nursery to a vegging room on that day's sales, in order to be available about 3 months later] AND under our BC-MMAR program, the tax paid on that day are actually the taxes owed on the next crop AND what results in practice is any and all grow ops get real proof that the taxes are paid on every plant in the grow-op and is 'prescribed' /needed in order to have continuity of supply, for our EDA members – Our Logenics system is proven to be the best at insuring nothing goes out the back door in all kinds of commercial applications, and it can easily be programmed to monitor and provide data that there is only prescribed activity throughout the entire cultivation operation – WITH THIS PROGRAM IN PLACE: There is simply no way for any product going out the back door of the grow-op [for example] and every grow-op operator should like this – What's important is that with the program, members' are assured to get their medicine thru a secure and reliable source, provided by the dispensary and grow-ops. AND everyone is compliant with the Income Tax Act, by just paying taxes, and be fully compliant under the Elections Act by remitting these collected taxes, under Freedom of Contract. [for example] and in this way we can carry-on doing our activity [without paying a $300K HC fee] and growers, in especially the old MMAR, can justify [with just this fee] why they want nothing to do with HC and their litany of really rotten rules and regulations under the MMPR program.
AND what's important is we have a giant arsenal of great Constitutional arguments that will assure that in order that our members can be served [as prescribed by law -Sec 1 Charter] means our providers will continue to operate if the AG objects and because it's a tax issue means it's settled quickly in BC Civil Court, in a legal process called 'civilization' ON THE MATTER OF <<YOU MUST OBEY THE HARPSTER>> The prime objective of the MMPR program is to create lots of case files [just look at what they budget for court /enforcement and prison costs] [aka - job security for the law society] and everyone in the cannabis community needs to realize that the Harpster wants this misery and suffering impaled on those who oppose his corporate governance. As i see, it''s the HARPSTER who is insisting on creating court misery, by using the Law as an Instrument of punishment and i insist that if any of the AG's employees engage us to “serve the Sovereign's interest' means we will be in civil court with a well thought out plan to win. ON THIS ISSUE: If authority wants to engage the Constitutional legitimacy of what the creator of this notion is engaging, can by civilly addressing this matter by negotiating or they can charge marc boyer and those acting under my claim of right will still have the right to be engaged in defending this right because at 'face value' it appears to be [thru a Sec 8 necessity defence ] a ways and means to achieve a Peaceful solution in a 'Free and Democratic Society'. [R v Oakes] [Sec 1 Charter]
BUT THEN: Authority might chose to prosecute those who break our BC-MMAR rules In the event that we can agree to them benefiting from our EDA 's right to Freedom of Contract under common law under a quid pro quo status. [For example] Since under the Longley Decision we can collect and remit a 10% PST means we can add-on and remit a 10% City Tax [for example] as long as it's to the mutual benefit of all parties. [that's generous compared to what other city's are suggesting] ON THIS MATTER: The City of Vancouver already has a 'vested interest' in finding a working solution to this matter, under the Pitfield decision [for example] and by accepting a remittance of this tax, would result where the Mayor and Council, would be given a chance to agree on how to regulate how the providers in Vancouver operate in order to protect the security of our EDA members. BIG LEGAL QUIRKS IN BEING IN OUR RECOGNIZED FEDERAL POLITICAL PARTY
In law, an EDA and its providers are NOT being 'occupied' in a criminal organization [for example] because we are actually engaged in a lawful activity, under a political guarantee to make a profit by protecting our political beliefs under Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Association AND most important Freedom of Contract, AND by definition that means the majority in power in Parliament, who obviously will think we are wrong and false in our beliefs, would /might act against us especially if they act like it's business as usual [after Sept 1st] under defacto law [Sec 15 CC] THAT SAID - [Under Sec 9 BC Police Act] - If crimes are done by an ordinary citizen [who is acting outside the BC-MMAR] means they're subject to the rules that the corporate occupiers' are enforcing under defacto law [Sec 15 CC]. Then any Harpster employee can do whatever they want under defacto law, because you are subject to the Harpster's arbitrary rule, in order to serve the Sovereign's interest on the belief that it's difficult to call any abuse of 'ordinary citizens' under the Supremacy of Parliament, as blatantly being done under corporate tyranny
BUT any abuse of any member in good-standing [acting inside our [box] BC-MMAR program] is a blatant abuse of the rule of law because it's, by definition, the implementing of corporate tyranny [taking what no body has the right to take] AND as of Sept 1st that's a punishable crime of state by Health Canada and any of the AG's employees. Frankly, the Harpster is the criminal, and like all criminals, he has a gang of thugs who think, therefor can do anything he wants, because [for example] they think they have a great excuse that the Harpsters must, under foreign obligations, comply with HC, because under the Supremacy of Parliament 'ordinary citizens must obey the law'.
AND if there is no body [like the Order of the Garter] to act after this UCC decree comes into affect on Sept 1st, then [by definition] there will be 2 or 3 perverts of the law who fail a major test, [Heb 10] which is exactly what a real Millennium Challenge is supposed to test. In this way we get an instant karma moment to see if those with authority in this matter repent, and when/if one repents means they could start the rebellion of Luke 11/21 [that's a good thing] – Any private individual under our BC-MMAR must be treated civilly and with respect [as opposed to be submissive] because we are all upholding a more noble trust [serving the Creator] and under Sec 8 CC 'it's an offence unknown to man' for benefiting from or providing for virtually anything we do while being caretakers of a garden. It really is legal insanity [Sec 16 CC] for any AG to even think that he can find anyone guilty when we can and are operating under common law. IN THE EVENT THAT any AG engages us to be submissive to the Sovereign's interest by charging me [for example] to appear before a JP at a 'show cause hearing' [who is supposed to be a new UCC enforcer again] means this court must respect our right to stand-under common law jurisdiction and in so doing must drop the charges or forward our case to a common law court, and if any body obstruct with this civilization process means a litany of crimes of state, where [Heb 10] 2 or 3 witnesses scenarios start occurring and keep on repeating themselves at every appearance, and anything could happen, which is exactly the liability that a real Millennium Challenge is supposed to create By definition any EDA can enter into common law contract with anyone and under this defence alone, it would take a big book to outline all the benefits this gives to all our members – In law, under a political party, we are NOT in any occupation [instead] we are doing an activity and every member is actually a 'private individual' as defined under the Elections Act, and – We are ordering a computer program, which is in 'essence' a slave to deliver to its members' and this program is providing for the members' needs, as prescribed by law. [Sec 1 Charter] – [in law] The Quadra EDA is a natural person [the members order from is an idiot/savant and] it's a computer program that is in law the 'prescriber': so go charge the computer with a crime. – A human being must still sign off for this program's activity report, every quarterly, and keep up to date on being compliant with the Elections Act day to day affairs. Which means that an AG could charge the 'fall-guy' of this notion, and since marc boyer is the creator of this notion means that in law, until told otherwise, marc boyer can and is the fiduciary trustee of the BC-MMAR, who will simply assure that a program is compliant with properly maintain an infra-structure that delivers herbal medicine that takes 3-months [or so] to replace and this activity is achieved thru a set of ongoing mutual 3-party fiduciary trust agreements for the members [under Quadra EDA, which marc boyer signs off on], with any EDA, on behalf of the grower and the dispensary [EDA agent /providers], who sign off, for the benefit of their members, and – Our Logenics team can deliver a comprehensive archetypal platform, with easy to use accounting /logistics programs, where by just entering the sale into our Logenics system will make it impossible to be charged in the 1st place BUT THEN the Harpster is the criminal. – BOTTOM LINE: Providing all the services necessary to be compliant with Elections Canada and The Income Tax Act, is exactly what our BC-MMAR program offers, and that's very important because The Election Act states that if any act or statute interferes /encroaches on any benefit of any private individual in our EDA, [for example] means the individual rights upheld under Election Act is Supreme, and over-rides any other act or statute – as i see it: There is simply no way to protect any old MMAR member who refuse to be governed under the new HC program, because they can change the contract later at will. Under common law a contract is not a contract unless it's to the mutual benefit of all parties and this HC contract totally destroys this trust thru lexicography [pervert the law with words] Black Law 7th defines it as an addition that leads to legal insanity [Sec 16 CC]
By definition any EDA can enter into common law contract with anyone and under this defence alone, it would take a big book to outline all the benefits this gives to all our members There are so many worst case scenarios BUT
[for example] By definition every 'Courtesy Notice' that a provider [like a grower] delivers to authorities is by definition a declaration /notice that [because as a new EDA agent means they can and] they are choosing our BC-MMAR program and by simply declaring this means we [the EDA] are forcing a binding contract on this authority to respect the fact that in the event that the served party(s) disrupt this BCMMAR activity will result in a civil court damages to recover what will amount to really big losses created by an interruption of business, plus punitive damages in BC Supreme Court Civil Court, AND a judge, will have to decide to BAR [from the onset] anyone else who is [at face value] compliant growers from being charged until this matter is resolved under Sec 13 of the Charter, because we are all innocent until proven guilty under common law. – In all cases, [because by being under the BC-MMAR] it's a rule of law challenge AND this means the judge MUST issue restraining orders to leave the others alone, because the only real criminal charge that can stick is if this member is acting outside our BC-MMAR rules that bar [for example] members and agents from trafficking in unprescribed medicine – In law and in fact under our Quadra EDA claim of right, no body in a Maritime jurisdiction court can oppose our right to Freedom of Contract to be governed under common law, without violating respondeat superior and our Constitutional rule of law, BECAUSE this is directly forbidden after Sept 1st and in this way, we find out if Instrument holders are engaged to act or not. – Every grower in the old MMAR are a known target to psychopath's, once HC starts soliciting $300K+ per/year fees from every grower. To my knowledge, there are 50 to 100 grow-op co-ops ready to pay it AND in this way, the law society checks-in to a cash cow based on misery. As i see it, under a necessity defence [Sec 8(3) CC] we can offer any member of our party a great defence from being left with no options, for free, by being a card-carrying party member AND with lots of EDAs participating means we [those called providers] can benefit from an offer that clearly is the lowest cost ways and means to defend and win what is fundamentally a claim of right to 'criminalize the prosecution' of any AG or anyone acting under them, who tramples on a provider, through a lawful process that's appropriately called 'civilization'
SIDE BAR: The main reason for keeping our Quadra EDA at arm's length from the other EDAs, is to provide a service of a central prescriber of activities between EDAs – Under our BC-MMAR program each EDA is there to serve their members' best interests AND because the providers are agents in agencies and are acting 'at arm's length' from the EDA, in order to serve their EDA's members, paves a way and means for all members to benefit under Freedom of contract under common law jurisdiction – AND under the principle that there's no such thing as too much Constitutional protection means that In law the best way our Quadra EDA can represent these agents best interests is to have our agents be the ones who empower our BC-MMAR program to prescribe, for the benefit of the members of any EDA. This full circle loop is Constitutionally, a bullet-proof ways and means to empower the BCMMAR program to protect every right they try to take away. ON OUR OFFER TO NEGOTIATE A WIN-WIN-WIN AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY BECAUSE of the power of contract: Our Quadra EDA agents agree that; it's to the overall political and social benefits for the members from paying a city tax on sales far outweighs the monetary costs of such a tax. AND since we can therefore we are making it known that: with this Courtesy Notice, we are seeking an agreement with the City of Vancouver, to recognize that by agreeing to pay a city-tax means in return the members get recognition of the members' right to continue to have well regulated compassion clubs AND in this way, the City can actually be Instrumental in co-operating with our agents' wish to not create a tax burden and frankly the overall political and social benefits are greater than just the monetary gain because the city benefits from happy voters and a healthy tax revenue, AND frankly why not now, because it's safe to assume that this Mayor and Council, are probably the best shot we have at finding friends that would appreciate being helpful in ending the misery caused by prohibition. AND with a city tax to offset the legal costs of their legal department [for example] that would occur from defending that they can collect this tax and, in this way, the City is recognizing, thru its Police Chief and its courts that our members are engaging these providers to operate .within the rules and regulations of the BC-MMAR program. In law and in practice the city was never protecting dispensaries or it's growers; they were always protecting the rights of the members that meet the City's standards on who qualifies to have access to herbal medicine.
AND in Vancouver's case that would result in about the same situation the city is in now where they are respecting rights of societies by not really interfering and in this way providers carry out their mission statement. Frankly this BC-MMAR program would create a situation where very little disruption on how these societies presently do business because the difference in administering a Co-op and a Society are so similar that the nature and texture of how each club deals with the members will not be negatively impacted by changes AND frankly our BC-MMAR program is just a superior accounting platform that the providers now need to defend against the total disruption that this ill-conceived Death Canada - MMPR program will try to impose. The City actually needs our program to protect what they have fought hard to preserve. IN SUMMARY: The notion here is to make it very unattractive to act, under the total abuse of the force of law AND frankly, my Millennium Trust Challenge is not unwarranted, and taking a city tax is not even probate because all kinds of cities are engaging in similar ways and means to get happy voters and benefit the city that hosts, in our case, our EDA activities. it's a genuine offer to negotiate in good faith, with [in our case] a Mayor and Council who have demonstrated a desire to find a solution to prohibition in general, with a very good and Peaceful way to gain friends by exercising Our EDA's right to enter into common law contract, through the agents, because they can contract on behalf of the members Frankly, if the present societies don't like what we are offering means they can go with the MMPR program, which obviously some are prepared to do, and frankly the City and we can't stop them, if they chose to comply with paying taxes, under the MMPR; we just need to Peacefully co-exist and be respected, and this can occur by paying a city-tax. In law, we are offering to have the members taxed and in return, the City, recognize our activity, and in this way the City will not be burdened by the social and political costs of fighting a lost cause of refusing to co-exist in Peace with us. In law we are not legalizing Marijuana, we are legalizing a ways and means to get medical access for our medicine, from a safe and secure providers. As i see it: This initiative is being offered as a ways and means to pursue the gentle Spirit [1Cor4:20] in a well thought out plan to win in the end, What needs to be pointed out that the idea that providers can sit on a fence till March 1st 2014, is at best irresponsible because HC says the next phase of both programs will start to be phased into one, on [or] by Oct 1st 2013, which means formal notices to comply with the MMPR, can happen any time after Oct 1st and it really is absurd to wait until after HC – MMPR slaps the would-be providers of our program, [the sitter on the fence] because, under this approach to solve your new problem. means it will cost you 10X to 100X more to become an BC-MMAR provider [not by us but] because you'll be caught in a liability of not being in [the box] our BC-MMAR program before the HC – MMPR hammer drops. If you are in our program when they drop the notice to show that you're legally paying taxes, means we are actually being invited to file for a tax ruling [in our case] in A City of Vancouver's BC Civil Court, to rule on the legitimacy of how we are compliant under the Income Tax Act, and under the Elections Act, and if the judge refuses to recognize this right, means that it's by definition the state crime of treachery to collude with the Treasury to subvert the Constitution and or a violation of Sec 336 CC Criminal Breach of Fiduciary Trust [for example] in other words from the onset we will know if my defence works. As i see it, everything and everyone that gained anything under the quasi-umbrella of the old MMAR program is null and void, once HC – MMPR starts taking license fees from those who chose their program and that means they think it will take till March 1st for there to be no one left standing under the old MMAR program. People need to wake up to the fact that we must stand together on something or those who refuse will probably fall this fall or winter. And in this way i get an answer to this Rom 10on riddle: 14 How, then, can they call on the one they have not believed in? And how can they believe in the one of whom they have not heard? And so on... 18 But I ask: Did they not hear? Of course they did We can change the world if only knew what to do, so i leave it up to you [Ten Years After] For more info or clarification of any point please call marc boyer @ 778-707-7461 [or] email me at email@example.com or go read this last years posting on our Facebook page called “Parti Marijuana Party Co-op Initiative” or on my page under: Marc Boyer Vancouver, [or] read /download from a long list of PDF articles posted on scribd.com under Marc Boyer [or] watch some of my more recent videos on YouTube under Marc Boyer Vancouver
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.