Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Main Topics
What is network optimisation? 2 Concept for optimisation 14
Why optimisation? 2 Analysis programs 15
Aim of network optimisation 3 Problem symptoms 15
Advantages for the customer 3 Coverage analysis 16
Planning vs. optimising 4 Test mobile measurements 16
Major problem areas 4 Possible problem areas 17
Radio optimisation related processes 5 Antenna configuration 18
Tuning 5 Antenna types - typical beam patterns 18
Test types 6 Antenna fine tuning 19
Measurement analysis 6 Omni vs. sectorised 20
Change request and action 7 Vertical antenna beam 20
Acceptance tests 7 Tilting 21
Ongoing optimising 8 Antennadiversity type 22
Pre-analysis: general network check 8 Verification of RF network design 23
Customer complaints analysis 9 Site check 23
Collect/analyse OMC statistics 9 Antenna isolation 24
Collect/analyse drive test measurements 10 Site physical configuration 25
Implement changes 11 Site-to-site distances and distribution 25
Test mobile 11 Special features for improving coverage 26
Repeated call setups 12 Cell splitting, sectorisation 26
Continuous call 13 DTM check 27
Statistics 14 Propagation model verification 27
Link budget analysis 28
Why Optimisation?
Coverage holes
Performance degradation by interference
Different subscriber distribution compared to that assumed for
the network design
Unexpectedly high subscriber growth
Extensive network expansions ongoing
Frequency resources at the limit
Unexpected mobility profile of
subscribers
Thorough network planning from start can reduce the optimisation effort
significantly!
➨ In a poorly planned network, achievable optimisation effects without
Be involved
Feedback result
no coverage
interference
blocking
handover not working
HW/SW failures
Acceptance Ongoing
Tuning Tests Optimisation
Tuning
Repeat Process
until
Agreed Quality
Objectives :
➨ Verify network configuration against current planning status
➨ Identify and eliminate equipment faults (HW/SW) and installation
errors
➨ Ensure that the network is ready for acceptance testing
Test Types
Continuous drive test
➨ setup a test call and drive over an area for detecting lack of coverage,
missing handovers, interferences etc.
Spot test
➨ detail measurement to be taken at dedicated problem spots for detail
analyzing of specific problem
Measurement Analysis
Antenna Installation check
➨ height, orientation and tilt
Basic cell parameters and functions
➨ OMC
✲ BCCH, BSIC, CI, LAC
✲ Neighbour List, consistency
✲ HO and power parameters
✲ Call Setup on all timeslots and speech quality check
✲ HO to other sectors or other neighbours
Test measurement (TEMS etc. together with a GPS)
➨ Signal Strength
➨ Co-channel and adjacent interference
➨ Handover relations
ICN PLM CA NP © SIEMENS Limited 1999
s
Acceptance Tests
Ongoing Optimising
Pre-analysis:
Pre-analysis: Collect
Collect/ / Collect
Collect/ /
Collect
Collect/ / Propose
Propose/ /
General
General analyse
analyse analyse
analyse
analyse
analyse implement
implement
network
network OMC
OMC drive
drivetest
test
complaints
complaints changes
changes
check
check statistics
statistics measuremts
measuremts
Repeat
Repeat
process
processuntil
until
agreed quality
agreed quality
Disadvantages, limitations:
➨ Limited geographical resolution (Where does the problem occur?)
➨ Cannot separate problems due to coverage from other
✲ Call attempts in uncovered areas are not counted
✲ Call drop due to lack of coverage
➨ Network must have minimum load for reliable statistics
Test types
➨ Continuos drive test (Trace mode)
➨ Spot test
➨ Network performance test (Statistical mode)
Test Measurement
➨ Collect MS measurement report data (Downlink only!!)
Implement Changes
Test Mobile
PSTN-
Base Base Mobile Interface
Transceiver Station Switching
Station Controller Center
Serial Measuremt
Method Software
➨ call setup
➨ hold for predefined time period and then release
✲ predefined time = mean holding time
✲ call may be dropped earlier
➨ repeat call setup after predefined waiting time (typical 15 s)
Purpose
➨ simulate subscriber behavior
➨ wide area quality assessment and trend identification
ICN PLM CA NP © SIEMENS Limited 1999
s
Typical parameters
➨ call setup success rate, setup time, dropped call rate
➨ statistics can be generated in Tornado / Planet, e.g.
Call Diagnostics
Call Time Setup Clear Down RxQual (%) RxLev (%) Category
1 21:38.8 6.5 OK 100 100 GOOD
2 23:53.1 FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL NO SETUP
3 26:08.7 5.7 OK 98 85.3 LOW SIGNAL
4 28:23.9 6.4 OK 79.5 100 NOISY
5 30:38.8 5.8 FAIL FAIL FAIL DROPPED
6 32:54.4 12 OK 100 100 DELAYED
Continuous Call
Method
➨ call setup
➨ hold continuously until drive test route complete
✲ in case of call drops re-establish
Purpose
➨ Wide area quality trace
➨ Locating individual problem areas
➨ Detailed analysis in problem areas
➨ Quality assessment on rural highways etc.
➨ BS Testing and Functional Testing
Continuous Call
Typical parameters
➨ RxLev, RxQual, BCCH, BSIC,
handover, Layer 3 messages etc.
Import into planning tool
➨ Terrain or clutter background
➨ Comparison of measured
network performance vs.
prediction
Statistics:
➨ RxLev, RxQual, handover
success rate
Statistics
Performance Measurements
Provide an overview of network performance (statistics)
➨ uplink analysis also possible
➨ validity depends on sufficient samples
Examples:
➨ blocking rate
BTS ID LAC CI BSIC f1 f2 f3 f4 Busy hour TCH Blocking Rate
6 4 4052 2 4 83 69 16:00:00 66.53%
2 4 4083 2 2 76 67 16:00:00 30.16%
5 4 4051 2 6 79 66 16:00:00 7.91%
22 4 4183 2 0 77 12:00:00 3.96%
1 4 4082 2 1 84 80 13:00:00 3.81%
Performance Measurements
➨ Call setup success rate
BTS ID LAC CI Busy Hour Call Set-up Success Rate
25 4 4152 15:00:00 28.4%
29 4 4131 15:00:00 68.0%
15 4 4032 18:00:00 81.3%
5 4 4051 16:00:00 92.1%
26 4 4171 13:00:00 94.1%
11 4 4071 12:00:00 94.7%
Analysis Program
w rk?
to
Dropped Calls
im
pr
Network
ov
e
Handover Perf.
Speech Quality
Quick
Check General Check
Analysis Programs
Coverage: Analysis for Fulfilment of Coverage
Requirements (Urban, rural ...
areas, outdoor, in-car, indoor)
Dropped Call: Analysis for Dropped Calls due to
Interference, SW/HW failures,
Transmission Network Failures
Call Setup: Analysis for Blocking and Capacity
Limitations, Analysis for Resource
Allocation Procedures
Handover: Analysis for Efficient Handover
Performance
Speech Quality: Analysis for Interference
Problem Symptoms
No service High call drop rate
No coverage RF Network
No System Availability No coverage
Network Element Failures Interference
Transmission Network Failures Handover failure
Fixed Network BSS, SSS
Low call setup success rate Network Element Failure
RF Network Transmission Failures
No coverage Other networks
Interference Mobile terminal
Blocking
Fixed Network BSS, SSS Poor speech quality
RF Network
Blocking
No coverage
Overload
Interference
Other Poor handover performance
Fixed Network BSS, SSS
Network element failure
Transmission network failure
Other networks
Mobile Phone
Coverage Analysis
Test mobile measurements
Antenna configuration check
Verification of RF network design
DTM check
Propagation model verification
Link budget analysis
Consequences of
poor RxLev:
➨ low RxQual
➨ vulnerable
to interference
Limitation with
drive tests:
➨ downlink only
Another method:
➨ statistical
analysis
➨ OMC or drive
tests
Antenna Configuration
General points to check
➨ antenna type, e.g.
✲ omni
✲ directional 60, 90 or 120 degrees
✲ electrical downtilt
✲ cross-polarised
➨ antenna azimuth angle (for directional antennae)
✲ coverage targets
➨ antenna tilt angle
✲ electrical + mechanical
➨ diversity & isolation
✲ e.g. space diversity,
✲ polarisation diversity
ICN PLM CA NP © SIEMENS Limited 1999
s
Directional antenna
Horizontal Plane:
➨ Possible coverage weakness between sectors
➨ Interference reduction
➨ Traffic load distribution
Vertical Plane:
➨ Interference reduction
➨ Possible coverage weakness in the short to medium distance range
➨ Traffic load distribution
City
400 m
Solution: Add mechanical downtilt
Tilting
Antenna downtilt often used to minimise interference
➨ Minimum: Vertical mail lobe pointing at cell edge
h
BS
Tilting
Electrical Mechanical
➨ Advantages:
✲ Better back lobe characteristics
✲ Better lower side lobe characteristics A combination of
mechanical / electrical
➨ Disadvantages: downtilt may be used
✲ Antennas are more expensive
Tilting
Rx ant. 2
Rx ant.
Typical > 10
Horisontal / Cross
vertical polarised
Site Check
Verify that site is implemented according to plan
Check installation e.g.
➨ antenna spacing (diversity, isolation) Omni
Tx
➨ antennae in one sector are installed in the same plane k1
k2 k2
k d
Tx
a= max 15 ° Rx Tx Rxd
a
a
d d d
Antenna Isolation
Isolation by vertical or horizontal separation
between two antennas K73316..
60
A
Isolation /dB
50
40 Horizontal Horizontal
30
20 Vertical
10
0
A
500
750
1000
1250
1500
1750
2000
2250
Spacing A/ mm
Source: Kathrein
Vertical
ICN PLM CA NP © SIEMENS Limited 1999
s
Antenna Isolation
Isolation by vertical or horizontal separation
between two antennas K73416..
60
A
Is olation /dB
40 Horizontal Horizontal
20 Vertical
0
A
400
500
650
750
900
1000
1150
1250
Spacing A/mm
Source: Kathrein
Vertical
ICN PLM CA NP © SIEMENS Limited 1999
s
eet
et
Ma
Str
Outlines
e
tr
ing
S
ild s
cro
Ce
ll B Bu tline
ord u
er O
Scale = 0.5 Km
DTM Check
DTM resolution
➨ horisontal
✲ macrocell (typical 50-100 m for roads, 50 m for small cities, 20 - 40 m for
large cities)
✲ microcell (very high resolution, down to building level)
➨ vertical - should be high
Source data
➨ heights and clutter derived from paper maps
➨ clutter and / or vector updates by satellite photographs / aerial photos
for metropolitan areas
uplink
M S Peak Pow er
-85,00
0,20 0,40 0,60 0,80
Distance from BTS in km
-110 dBm
Downlink
40 dBm
37 dBm
ICN PLM CA NP © SIEMENS Limited 1999
s
MAXRETR
Slotted ALOHA mechanism: Several users may attempt to
access channel simultaneously
➨ in case of collision new attempts are made
➨ MAXRETR: Maximum no. of retries allowed
H(1) RA CH
RAC
C H (2 )
RA
H
AGC BTS
MS
✲ E.g: MAXRETR = 2
ICN PLM CA NP © SIEMENS Limited 1999
s
SCALE 1:2500
Inaccurate handover
decision EqualPowerBoundary
Mutual Neighbour
Non-Mutual Neighbour
Handover Failure & Missing Neighbour
Too many Neighbours
Dropped Call
Missing Neighbour
definition
Handover Failure
Dropped Call
Handover Parameters
Objectives:
➨ mobile should be connected to the
“best”cell
➨ avoid unnecessary handovers
Consequence
➨ good speech quality
➨ less dropped calls
Cell dragging
Cell dragging
Dropped Calls
Dropped Calls
Handover Measurements
Handover due to a better
cell
(RxLev_1 >
RxLev_Full)
Handover Parameters
Fine-tuning of handover parameters
➨ Moving cell boundaries in order to
✲ Enhance success rate for critical handovers
✲ Minimise local interference at the cell edge
✲ Traffic load sharing between cells
➨ Compared to other opimisation measures improvement potential is
limited
➨ Affected by
✲ Measurement averaging
PS! Neighbours
✲ Power control parameters
should in general
be mutual
UL
DL
Neighbour MS BTS
UL
DL
Neighbour MS BTS
UL
DL
Neighbour MS BTS
32 27 23 29 29 21 19 22 23 21
Average value = 24
F F S S F F F S S F
Measurement Values each
32 27 23 29 29 21 19 22 23 21 SACCH Multiframe (0.48s)
32 32 27 27 23 29 29 29 21 21
Average value = 27
– W_Lev_Full = 2
– W_Lev_SUB = 1
– Gliding Window = 5
Handover Algorithm
Handover
Handover
Decision
Decision
no no
yes Inter-cell HO No handover
DIST due to Distance action
no
Handover Criteria
Handover Region (due to quality and level)
Rx_Qual
L_Rx_Lev_XX_IH
7
Intercell HO Intracell HO
due to quality due to Quality
L_Rx_Qual_XX_H
Intercell HO No handover
due to level action due to
quality or level
Rx_Lev
0 L_Rx_Lev_XX_H 63
ICN PLM CA NP © SIEMENS Limited 1999
s
Handover Decision
Intracell Handover
Stay within cell, change frequency / time slot situation
➨ in general interference different on different timeslots
➨ change to a different cell may be unnecessary
Interferer: f1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Sever: f1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Intracell Handover
Check for simultaneous occurrence of:
➨ Poor quality (high Rx_Qual)
➨ Sufficient signal level
✲ L_Rx_Lev_XX_IH
Rx_Qual
L_Rx_Lev_XX_IH
Intracell HO
due to Quality
L_Rx_Qual_XX_H
L_Rx_Lev_XX_H Rx_Lev
Level Handovers
Adjacent cell not stronger than current cell + HO margin
Serving cell has insufficient coverage
➨ “emergency handover” to cell with better coverage
Rx_Lev
Server HOMARGIN
HO_Threshold_Lev
neighbour
MinHOReqInt
Driven route
Level Handovers
Receiver limit sensitivity
L_RXLEV_XX_H (outgoing level HO)
L_RXLEV_XX_IH (inter HO
/ intracell quality HO)
RXLEV_MIN (incoming HO)
BTS
RXLEV_MIN
threshold for cell to accept incoming handover
L_RXLEV_XX_H
threshold for initiating outgoing handover due to signal
level
relation with RXLEV_MIN will determine hysteresis
L_RXLEV_XX_IH
ICN PLM CA NP
threshold for initiating inter / intracell quality HO
© SIEMENS Limited 1999
s
Distance Handover
Maximum allowable BS-MS distance
➨ Default: MS_Range_Max=61 (bits Timing Advance,TA)
✲ Maximum value: 63, corresponding to 35 km
G S M : ma
x 35 km Enhanced by
“Extended Cell”
BTS2
Ping-Pong HO
2. PBGT(n) = RXLEV_NCELL(n)-(RXLEV_DL+PWR_C_D)
+Min(MS_TWPWR_MAX(n),P)-Min(MS_TXPWR_MAX(n),P)
> HO_MARGIN(n)
Cell Reselection
C1
C1==AV_RXLEV
AV_RXLEV- -RXLEV_ACCESS_MIN
RXLEV_ACCESS_MIN- -MAX(0,MS_TXPWR_MAX_CCH-P)
MAX(0,MS_TXPWR_MAX_CCH-P)>>00
Cell Reselection
DL
For example:
BTS
MS
MS class 5 (GSM900)
AV_RXLEV=-97 dBm
Cell Reselection
For example: DL
MS class 5 (GSM900)
Operator B
DL BTS
Cell Reselection
C1 criteria
➨ Same Location Area
✲ C1 (neighbour cell) > C1 (serving cell)
➨ Different Location Area
✲ C1 (neighbour cell) > C1 (serving cell) + Cell_Reselect_Hysteresis
BTS1 BTS2
BER % RxQual
0.0 - 0.2 0
0.2 - 0.4 1
0.4 - 0.8 2
0.8 - 1.6 3
1.6 - 3.2 4
3.2 - 6.4 5
6.4 - 12.8 6
> 12.8 7
With frequency hopping:
RxQual not a valid parameter
Frequency Changes
Sometimes necessary to minimise interference
As network reaches capacity limit this becomes difficult
➨ Other frequencies may be affected by the change
Can be done at either interfering cell or victim cell
➨ Choice: Whichever happens to be easier to change
Existing plan may be entered into planning tool as
“constraints”
➨ search for “optimum” frequency allocation for a given cell
At a certain point the whole network e.g. in a city may have to
be re-planned
Frequency Changes
BCCH/TCH swapping
➨ Method sometimes used: Alternate between clusters
BSIC Optimisation
f9
Interference Reduction
Power Control
Frequency Hopping
Discontinuous Transmission DTX
Power Control
Quality-triggered PC
➨ e.g. L_RXQUAL_XX_P = 4
✲ Triggers a power increase at poor quality
➨ e.g. U_RXQUAL_XX_P = 1
✲ Triggers a power reduction at good quality
✲ Virtually disabled by setting to “highest” RXQUAL value
✲ Level criterion is more suitable for power reduction
Level-triggered PC
➨ e.g. L_RXLEV_XX_P = 25 (-85 dBm)
✲ Triggers a power increase at bad level
➨ e.g. U_RXQUAL_XX_P = 35 (-75 dBm)
✲ Triggers a power reduction at good level
Power Control
RXQUAL
Power Increase
(bad quality)
L_RXQUAL_XX_P
Power Decrease
Power Increase
(Good Level)
(bad level)
L_RXQUAL_XX_P
Power Decrease
(good quality)
RXLEV
L_RXLEV_XX_P U_RXLEV_XX_P
2*POW_RED_STEP_SIZE
Frequency Hopping
0 BCCH
Cyclic / Pseudo Random hopping
0 SDCCH
Baseband / Synthesized hopping
1 Call 1
5 Call 2
f1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
f2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
f3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
TDMA frame
(8 time slots)
Frequency Hopping
0 BCCH
Cyclic / Pseudo Random hopping
0 SDCCH
Baseband / Synthesized hopping
Call 1
Call 2
f1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
f2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
f3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
TDMA frame
(8 time slots)
Frequency Hopping
0 BCCH
Cyclic / Pseudo Random hopping
0 SDCCH
Baseband / Synthesized hopping
1 Call 1
5 Call 2
f1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
f2,f3,f4,f5,f6,f7 f4 f3 f6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
f2,f3,f4,f5,f6,f7 f7
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
TDMA frame
(8 time slots)
DTX
Goal: Reduce speech data rate from 13 kbps (user speaking) to
500 bps (enough to encode background noise)
➨ reduce MS power consumption
➨ reduce the interference in a cell
SBS parameter for DTX / VAS administration
➨ DTXUL -> 0 : MS may use DTX (If possible)
1 : MS shall use DTX
2 : MS shall not use DTX
➨ DTXDL -> FALSE : downlink DTX disabled at BTS
TRUE : downlink DTX enabled at BTS
Channel Configuration
Channel Type Channel Combination
TCHFULL TCH/F + FACCH/F + SACCH/F
MAINBCCH FCCH + SCH + BCCH + CCCH (AGCH+PCH+RACH)
MBCCHC FCCH + SCH + BCCH + CCCH + 4 (SDCCH+SACCH)
SDCCH 8 (SDCCH + SACCH)
TCHF&HLF* TCH/H(0) + FACCH/H (0) + SACCH/H(0) + TCH/H(1)
BCBCH* FCCH + SCH + BCCH + CCCH + 3 (SDCCH+SACCH) + CBCH
SCBCH* 7 (SDCCH + SACCH) + CBCH
CCCH* BCCH + CCCH
Capacity Enhancements
Easy approach: Add TRX’s
Problem: No more frequencies:
➨ Options
✲ Traffic load distribution
✲ Interference optimisation features: FH, PC, DTX
✲ Sectorisation: Increasing cell density
✲ Cell splitting: Increasing site density
✲ HCS
– Dual band operation (e.g. GSM900/DCS1800)
– Dual mode operation (e.g. GSM900/DECT)
– Underlay / Overlay
– Overlaid micro- and picocells
✲ Half rate coding
✲ Migration to 3rd Generation Systems
ICN PLM CA NP © SIEMENS Limited 1999
s
Adding TRX
Congested cells found by OMC measurements
Sec TRX GOS 2% Week1 Week2 Week3 Week4 Week5 Week6 Week7
BTS1 1 3 14.9 10.53 9.66 10.21 9.88 10.54 9.97 10.37
BTS2 2 2 8.2 7.43 7.26 7.59 6.98 7.55 8.02 8.33
BTS3 3 3 14.9 11.92 11.4 12.12 11.82 11.75 12.02 12.15
✓
✓No
Noadditional
additionalsites
sitesor
orfrequencies
frequenciesrequired
required
✓
✓Available,
Available,stable
stable
✓
✓Implementation
Implementationcauses
causesnonodisturbance
disturbanceofof
network
networkoperation
operation
✗✗LLittle
ittleor
orno
noeffect
effectififavailable
availablespectrum
spectrumisisvery
very
limited
limited(BCCH
(BCCHlimitations)
limitations)
Default HO boundaries
Changed HO boundaries
I
C
E
Indoor coverage
Outdoor Installatio n
Hotspot
C L
usually indoors O Ls
Parking lot
➨ coverage to building
Contiguous Microcellular Coverage
Concentric cells
C/I = 17 dB C/I = 17 dB
Signal
level level
C/I = 0 dB Signal
f3 f1 f2 f3
Macrocells
Microcells
Picocells
Overlaid
microcells
Dual mode
Cell spiltting
Dual band
Frequency
Underlay/
Sectorisation
Changes
Overlay
HR Repeaters
FH, PC, DTX
Preamps
orientation and tilt
setting
Adding
TRX
Cost, Effort
Congestion
Poor speech
Extended call quality
setup times
Interference/
Noise
Dropped
Unavailability call
of service