This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
Mr Brendan Facey Department of Justice 5 Infringement management & Enforcement Services
Brendan.Facey@justice.vic.gov.au Cc: 10
Mr Jon Kaila email@example.com
Mr Robert Clark MP Attorney-General firstname.lastname@example.org
Inspector Stephen Mutton, from Melton police C/o email@example.com
Ken Lay Chief Commissioner, Victorian Police, C/o firstname.lastname@example.org
Ian Grey Chief Magistrate, Magistrates Court of Victoria 233 William Street Melbourne Vic 3000, C/o email@example.com M Hoyle, Quality and client support Coordinator Civic Compliance Victoria GPO Box 1916, Melbourne VIC 3001, Traffic_Inquiries@tenixsolutions.com Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka, MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL® Email: mayJUSTICEalwaysPREVAIL@schorel-hlavka.com
Your Ref: BC/15766 130904-COMPLAINT Ref Brendan Facey Director IM&ES -Sheriff) OBL 1106575301-CONSTITUTIONAL issues etc
Sir, further to my previous correspondence, and in particular also my 22 August 2013 reference to the Agar v Dolheguy & Anor  VSC 506 (11 November 2010) decision, I will set out some further and other matters. As indicated the High Court of Australia stated:
Uniform Tax \case, 1942 (65CLR 373 at 408) 23-7-1942 QUOTE 35 Common expressions such as: 'The Courts have declared a statute invalid'," says Chief Justice Latham, "sometimes lead to misunderstanding. A pretended law made in excess of power is not and never has been a law at all. Anybody in the country is entitled to disregard it. Naturally, he will feel safer if he has a decision of a court in his favor, but such a decision is not an element, which produces invalidity in any law. The law is not valid until a court pronounces against it - and thereafter invalid. If it is beyond power it is 40 invalid ab initio. END QUOTE
And the Framers of the Constitution embedded the legal principle in the constitution:
Hansard 9-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National 45 Australasian Convention) QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN (Victoria).-The position of my honorable and learned friend (Mr. [start page 2092] Higgins) may be perfectly correct. It may be that without any special provision the practice of the High Court, when declaring an Act ultra vires, would be that such a declaration applied only to the part which trespassed 50 beyond the limits of the Constitution. If that were so, it would be a general principle applicable to the interpretation of the whole of the Constitution. END QUOTE Hansard 8-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates 55 QUOTE p1 4-9-2013 Sheriff’s Office Ref: COMPLAINT Your Ref: BC/15766 INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0 PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, by fax 0011-61-3-94577209 or E-mail INSPECTOR-RIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com Free download of documents at blog Http://www.scribd.com/InspectorRikati
[start page 2004] Mr. ISAACS.-No. If it is ultra vires of the Constitution it would, of course, be invalid. END QUOTE 5
And the High Court of Australia also stated:
Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally; Re Wakim; Ex parte Darvall; Re Brown; Ex parte Amann; Spi  HCA 27 (17 June 1999) QUOTE For constitutional purposes, they are a nullity. No doctrine of res judicata or issue estoppel can prevail 10 against the Constitution. Mr Gould is entitled to disregard the orders made in Gould v Brown. No doubt, as Latham CJ said of invalid legislation, "he will feel safer if he has a decision of a court in his favour". That is because those relying on the earlier decision may seek to enforce it against Mr Gould. END QUOTE 15 Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally; Re Wakim; Ex parte Darvall; Re Brown; Ex parte Amann; Spi  HCA 27 (17 June 1999) QUOTE Constitutional interpretation 1. 20 The starting point for a principled interpretation of the Constitution is the search for the intention of its makers. That does not mean a search for their subjective beliefs, hopes or expectations. Constitutional interpretation is not a search for the mental states of those who made, or for that matter approved or enacted, the Constitution. The intention of its makers can only be deduced from the words that they used in the historical context in which they used them. In a paper on constitutional interpretation, presented at Fordham University in 1996, Professor Ronald Dworkin argued, correctly in my opinion: "We must begin, in my view, by asking what - on the best evidence available - the authors of the text in question intended to say. That is an exercise in what I have called constructive interpretation. It does not mean peeking inside the skulls of people dead for centuries. It means trying to make the best sense we can of an historical event someone, or a social group with particular responsibilities, speaking or writing in a particular way on a particular occasion." 2. The application which this Court has given to some words and phrases of the Constitution would almost certainly have surprised most of those who participated in the making of the Constitution. Most of them could not have foreseen the extent to which the application of those words and phrases would enable the Commonwealth to dominate the federation and reduce the power of the States to control their domestic affairs. But that does not mean that this Court's interpretation of our Constitution has lacked fidelity to the intentions of those who made the Constitution. Where the interpretation of individual words or phrases of the Constitution is in issue, the current doctrine of the Court draws a distinction between connotation and denotation or, in other words, between meaning and application. Thus, in Ex parte Professional Engineers' Association Windeyer J said: "We must not, in interpreting the Constitution, restrict the denotation of its terms to the things they denoted in 1900. The denotation of words becomes enlarged as new things falling within their connotations come into existence or become known. But in the interpretation of the Constitution the connotation or connotations of its words should remain constant. We are not to give words a meaning different from any meaning which they could have borne in 1900. Law is to be accommodated to changing facts. It is not to be changed as language changes." END QUOTE
I can assure you that neither the Framers of the Constitution, nor the High Court of Australia for that, at each particular time of the quoted statements limited the application to one particular 50 individual but rather stated a general application. Therefore, when I disputed the jurisdiction of any court, before even any purported court order was issued, then the onus was upon the Police or other person acting for or on behalf of the police to obtain a ruling from a competent court of jurisdiction to have the legislation declared constitutionally valid. (Intra vires). Failing this, then as on 19 July 2006, where I then succeeded in 2 appeals before the County 55 Court of Victoria against convictions of FAILING TO VOTE that the court had no jurisdiction
p2 4-9-2013 Sheriff’s Office Ref: COMPLAINT Your Ref: BC/15766 INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0 PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, by fax 0011-61-3-94577209 or E-mail INSPECTOR-RIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com Free download of documents at blog Http://www.scribd.com/InspectorRikati
3 for example because it is a corporate court using the same ABN number as the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, hence by this preventing the court to be a Chapter III court within The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) then there was no valid decision. As I then also submitted, the onus of proving the validity of the legislation rest upon the 5 prosecutor. Hence, the police had the onus to take the matter to the High Court of Australia as to petition it to declare the disputed legislation to be declared INTRA VIRES. failing this the legislation is and remains to be ULTRA VIRES. The position therefore arises what valid court order exist? you seek to rely upon the purported disputed Infringement Court warrant issues and earlier order which was issued in defiance of 10 what was constitutionally appropriate and permissible, and so ULTRA VIRES. Hence, you have so to say no leg to stand upon. I do not know if you used to blatantly ignore the rule of law when you were dealing with the issue of licences regarding alcohol, etc, but surely you ought to have some basic understanding, at least acting as a Sheriff what the legal principles of law are?
As I previous requested you to clarify is if you were acting as a Sheriff as an OFFICER OF THE COURT or acting merely as a Government Department entity nothing to do with the courts. There is as I outlined a major difference. As you relied upon some reasoning of some department and not strictly upon the letter of the law I assume that you are not at all a Sheriff of the courts, but merely so to say a glorified debt collector. This could in my view pose very serious legal complications for you, as well as the government as to the validity of past actions by the Sheriff’s Office, as if you are nothing more but some dressed up entity as a public servant, ant and not a Court official then the deception upon the public is very serious indeed. As the Courts, again, must be separate from the government, then you cannot serve 2 masters, as I explained previously. Hence, you need to state which function you fulfil. Again, when I disputed the validity of the Infringement Notice and also the Courts to deal with the matter since 23 February 2011 then all and any Infringement Notice, and so the purported Infringement Court decisions from then on could no longer be enforced, and in fact neither any previous orders/warrants against anyone unless and until, if ever at all, the matters I disputed were ruled adverse to me by a comnpetent court of jurisdiction, not bein g a corporate entity as is with Victorian courts listed as “Business Unit 19” with the Victorian government. This is because when I disputed the validity of the legislation and the validity of the infringement Court, it not just applies to my person but as it relates to a general principle it applies to all orders/warrants, etc, against any person relating to the matters objected against! I have quoted below an article by Mr Jon Kaila’s published article, and I am concerned that despite my numerous set outs you may have deliberately concealed from Inspector Stephen Mutton, from Melton police that not a single purported Infringement Court order/warrant could be lawfully enforced. So, all those people now terrorised to agree to make payments may just have a legal comeback for this. I have set out in the past that the police is entitled to stop a motorist regarding any matter relating to a motor vehicle being roadworthy, etc. However, I have the view that it has no legal powers to stop a motorist for the purpose of the Sheriff’s Office to enforce unconstitutional Infringement Court orders/warrants. Inspector Stephen Mutton, from Melton police may have acted in good faith to work with the Sheriff’s Office unaware that you may have completely concealed relevant details. A police officer is to serve the community and not being or become some glorified debt collector for the government no matter how unlawful this may be. In my view, the Chief Commissioner of police Mr Ken Lay ought to have been aware of my past writings that to nevertheless conceal this from relevant police officers, such as Inspector Stephen Mutton, from Melton police may undermine the public confidence of the community in the Victorian police force. Likewise I hold that the chief magistrate has the onus to warn everyone concerned that unless and until a competent court declared the legislation and other matters disputed to be INTRA VIRES, if ever at all, then all Infringement Notices, and purported p3 4-9-2013 Sheriff’s Office Ref: COMPLAINT Your Ref: BC/15766
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0 PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, by fax 0011-61-3-94577209 or E-mail INSPECTOR-RIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com Free download of documents at blog Http://www.scribd.com/InspectorRikati
4 Infringement Court orders/warrants cannot be legally enforced. This is why I deliberately forward correspondences to various persons. Actually the same with Civic Compliance Victoria! We have a constitution and the States created within s106 of the constitution are bound by this 5 and so its embedded legal principles.
As I indicated VicRoads unlawfully applied a point against my licence and failed to withdraw this, when specifically requested to do so and as such their conduct I hold is a defiance to the rule of law also. Who are they to ignore the basic rule of law, the constitution? How can anyone 10 purport to pursue the rule of Law contrary to what is constitutionally permissible?
You have indicated that you will prevent reregistration of the RIKATI registered motor vehicle and I make clear that any such conduct would be not only unlawful but unconstitutional. My concern is, that by your own declaration that you would pursue the denial or renewal of 15 registration of the vehicle with the registration RIKATI itself underlines in my view you couldn’t care less what is legally permissible or not. Those who now submitted to the extortion/terrorism to agree to pay for alleged outstanding fines may now sue the police, if they become aware that the police nor the Sheriff’s Office had any 20 legal standing and acted therefore, so to say, nothing more but as common criminals and terrorist. Let’s make it very clear, there is no onus upon me to disprove the validity of any legislation! All I needed to do was to object to the validity of certain legislation, as I did, and from there on the onus was upon the prosecutor to obtain a valid court decision of a competent court in law to 25 declare the disputed legislation to be INTRA VIRES and unless and until, if ever at all, the prosecutor was able to obtain such a court determination, then all and any Infringement Notice/Court order/warrant against any person, not just me, relating to the same disputed legal provisions remain to be without legal force. As again I proved on 19 July 2006, after a 5 year epic legal battle between the Commonwealth lawyers and myself, that in the end my knowledge as a CONSTITUTIONALIST prevailed! Yet, the AEC nevertheless continues to fine people for FAILING TO VOTE, despite that it lost comprehensively the case against me, on 19 July 2006, where I proved that it is unconstitutional for any person to be compelled to register or to vote! And, for then record this was not disputed 35 by the Australian Electoral Commission!
Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates QUOTE Sir JOHN DOWNER.I think we might, on the attempt to found this great Commonwealth, just advance one step, not beyond 40 the substance of the legislation, but beyond the form of the legislation, of the different colonies, and say that there shall be embedded in the Constitution the righteous principle that the Ministers of the Crown and their officials shall be liable for any arbitrary act or wrong they may do, in the same way as any private person would be. END QUOTE 45 .
Let there be no mistake, as much as citizens are expected to know what the law is about as there is no excuse not to know it, then those purporting to enforce the law must make sure they better do so in a lawful manner.
As my past writings did set out, that if the Government in fact is nothing more but a foreign registered corporation then none of the purported laws are valid, and neither can the purported Victorian Constitution Act 1975 be so, as the latter unless it was approved by way of State referendum it cannot be validly applied. I will not delve into the same matters again in great details, as you can read my elaborate set out at my blog and in published books, in the 55 INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series on certain constitutional and other legal issues.
50 p4 4-9-2013 Sheriff’s Office Ref: COMPLAINT Your Ref: BC/15766 INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0 PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, by fax 0011-61-3-94577209 or E-mail INSPECTOR-RIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com Free download of documents at blog Http://www.scribd.com/InspectorRikati
5 I noticed that you visited my blog at www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati, and I have now uploaded some other documents as to make it readily available, in case you didn’t have any copies (albeit not all copies of documents may be listed, albeit unintentionally):
5 http://www.scribd.com/doc/159730796/130812-COMPLAINT-Ref-Brendan-Facey-Director-IM-ES-Sheriff-OBL-1 106575301 http://www.scribd.com/doc/155487382/130723-R-Clark-Attorney-General-Others-Re-COMPLAINT http://www.scribd.com/doc/154693390/130719-R-Clark-Attorney-General-Others-Re-COMPLAINT-SheriffCONTEMPT-of-COURT-Etc 10 http://www.scribd.com/doc/154133665/110717-Victorian-Police-obl-1106575301 http://www.scribd.com/doc/149906774/130625-Brendan-Facey-Director-IM-ES-Sheriff-OBL-1106575301 http://www.scribd.com/doc/81577994/120214-R-Clark-Attorney-General-Others http://www.scribd.com/doc/69855751/111022-Vicroads-DEMAND-to-Rectify-Etc http://www.scribd.com/doc/67033779/111001-Mr-Robert-Clark-Attorney-general-Complaint-Details-Requested15 Etc-supplement http://www.scribd.com/doc/65854236/110922-01-Jack-Frost-Re-Warrant-Tenix-Solutions-Etc http://www.scribd.com/doc/64785582/110913-Ted-Baillieu-Premier-Infringement-Issues-No-1158210495-Etc http://www.scribd.com/doc/64579374/110912-Ted-Baillieu-Premier-No-1158210495-Etc http://www.scribd.com/doc/64040884/110906-Ted-Baillieu-Premier-No-1158210495-Etc 20 http://www.scribd.com/doc/164450288/110830-Magistrates-Court-of-Victoria-No-1158210495-Etc http://www.scribd.com/doc/164450222/110828-Magistrates-Court-of-Victoria-No-1158210495 http://www.scribd.com/doc/164450276/110810-Magistrates-Court-of-Victoria-No-1158210495-ADDRESS-to-theCOURT http://www.scribd.com/doc/164450233/110810-Magistrates-Court-of-Victoria-No-1158210495 25 http://www.scribd.com/doc/164450287/110727-01-Mag-Court-Letter http://www.scribd.com/doc/164450092/110719-02-Points-Letter-Enveloppe http://www.scribd.com/doc/164450015/110719-01-Points-Letter http://www.scribd.com/doc/164449913/110717-Victorian-Police-obl-1106575301 http://www.scribd.com/doc/164449165/110716-Premier-Ted-Bailliue-COMPLAINT-Etc 30 http://www.scribd.com/doc/164456507/110712-Enforcement-Notice http://www.scribd.com/doc/164455892/110610-Premier-Ted-Bailliue-COMPLAINT-Etc http://www.scribd.com/doc/164448807/110530-Premier-Ted-Bailliue-COMPLAINT-Etc http://www.scribd.com/doc/164448504/110323-Victorian-Police-obl-1106575301 http://www.scribd.com/doc/164450591/110320-Reply 35 http://www.scribd.com/doc/164448071/110223-Victorian-Police-obl-1106575301 http://www.scribd.com/doc/164450578/110211-Infringement-Back http://www.scribd.com/doc/164450378/110211-Infringement-Front 40
I now quote some articles:
Law & Order
17,000 individuals wanted by police
45 Jon Kaila p5 4-9-2013 Sheriff’s Office Ref: COMPLAINT Your Ref: BC/15766 INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0 PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, by fax 0011-61-3-94577209 or E-mail INSPECTOR-RIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com Free download of documents at blog Http://www.scribd.com/InspectorRikati
Herald Sun August 29, 2013 10:00PM ONE in nine people living in a greater Melbourne metropolitan area is wanted by police, the Herald Sun can reveal. 5 Released figures show 17,000 individuals are wanted by police across Melton, Caroline Springs and Deer Park, which has a combined population of 159,353. And each person has an average of six warrants to their name a total of 107,000 and owe a massive $38 million in unpaid Sheriff's fines. Victoria Police launched Operation Surrender yesterday, urging criminals to hand themselves in before officers 10 come looking for them. "I knew it was an issue but the figures have shocked and disturbed me," said Inspector Stephen Mutton, from Melton police. "The top issues here are family violence, drug and alcohol issues and unpaid fines, and I believe all are linked. "If we can start clearing up some of these fines, I'm sure it's going to have a knock-on effect with other crime." 15 He added: "We know there are a large amount of people who have outstanding warrants, which can cause a huge amount of stress. "This mounting stress can often contribute to family violence and other criminal activity, so we are encouraging people to take responsibility and turn themselves in." Insp Mutton said if people didn't voluntarily hand themselves in, they would soon be caught. 20 "They should take this course of action because they don't want us to be seizing their car during the school run or being locked up on a Saturday and have to wait in custody to plead their case in court on the Monday. "Operation Surrender is about education and giving people the opportunity to make the right choice and deal with their problem, before they get caught by another means." A total of 20 people handed themselves in to police within the first 30 minutes of the operation starting on Thursday. 25 "Most of those who came forward let the fines build and build and, despite wanting to clear the decks, didn't know how to start repaying them," Insp Mutton said. "With those 20 people coming forward, we've been able to clear a couple of hundred warrants." For information, contact your local police station or call Civic Compliance Victoria on 1800 150 410. firstname.lastname@example.org 30 END QUOTE
Operation Surrender a success in Melton
Friday, 30 August 2013 09:32 35 Fifty-three people handed themselves in as part of a joint Victoria Police and Sherriff’s Office operation in Melton yesterday. Operation Surrender, which ran from 2pm to 10pm, gave people with outstanding fines or warrants an avenue to voluntarily surrender themselves. 40 The 53 people who voluntarily attended a mobile bus set up opposite Melton Police Station had 803 outstanding warrants totalling $264,694 actioned. Police and sheriff’s officers were present to explain processes relating to executing warrants and organising 45 appropriate arrangements to clear fines or deal with pending court proceedings. Eight of those who handed themselves in owed more than $10,000 worth of outstanding fines or warrants, with $22,000 the largest amount owed by one person. p6 4-9-2013 Sheriff’s Office Ref: COMPLAINT Your Ref: BC/15766 INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0 PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, by fax 0011-61-3-94577209 or E-mail INSPECTOR-RIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com Free download of documents at blog Http://www.scribd.com/InspectorRikati
Melton Inspector Stephen Mutton said the operation had been a great success with people who handed themselves in having the opportunity to make arrangements including payment plans or attending courts. “This operation gave people a chance to give themselves up and get their outstanding matters sorted before they get 5 caught by other means as police will be out conducting enforcement operations in coming weeks.” Following on from Operation Surrender, police and sheriff’s officers will be conducting road block operations throughout Melton and Caroline Springs to catch anyone who continues to ignore their outstanding warrants 10 Operation Surrender was initiated because there are currently more than 17,000 people with over 107,000 outstanding warrants, amounting to more than $38 million living in Melton, Caroline Springs and Deer Park,. People with outstanding warrants who are seeking more information can contact their local police station or call Civic Compliance Victoria on (03) 9200 8222. 15 Jess Foulds Media Officer VP29144/2013 END QUOTE
Again, I request you clarify your position regarding the Sheriff’s Office being a ordinary government department or being a section of the court. Also, that you do have the common decency to ensure that unless and until if ever at all you obtain a competent court of jurisdiction decision to declare the disputed legislation(s) INTRA VIRES you will not seek to enforce any purported fines/orders/warrants in relation to the disputed legislative provisions against any 25 person, not just against myself.
As the Framers of the Constitution made clear that the Commonwealth of Australia cannot interfere with the States internal matters, beyond the powers specifically provided in the constitution, and hence, it neither court force upon the courts, or any court, to use an ABN registration of the State Government because that would be an interference into the separation of 30 powers. No court using a ABN number of a foreign registered business entity can be deemed to be a competent court of jurisdiction! I therefore demand that you seize and desist of any purported enforcement of any Infringement Notice/order/warrant relating to the disputed legislative provisions against anyone unless and until, if ever at all, you can have a competent court of jurisdiction pronouncing a valid determination against the disputed legislation to declare 35 it INTRA VIRES! Do keep in mind, that with a gigantic class action against all who failed to act appropriately and/or acted unlawfully, being it the Sheriff, his officers, the Chief Commissioners, other police officers, Civic Compliance Victoria, and numerous others, not to forget the Chief Magistrate, for their conduct separately and/or combined, in this what I consider elaborate extortion and 40 terrorism upon citizen, may just drive home that not even a persons position as a public servant can protect against this, because once you act /defy the rule of law, governed by our principle law The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) then you cannot expect taxpayers to foot the bill for cost and compensation but accept to be held personally liable. Again:
45 Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates QUOTE Sir JOHN DOWNER.I think we might, on the attempt to found this great Commonwealth, just advance one step, not beyond the substance of the legislation, but beyond the form of the legislation, of the different colonies, and say that there shall be embedded in the Constitution the righteous principle that the Ministers of the 50 Crown and their officials shall be liable for any arbitrary act or wrong they may do, in the same way as any private person would be. END QUOTE p7 4-9-2013 Sheriff’s Office Ref: COMPLAINT Your Ref: BC/15766 INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0 PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, by fax 0011-61-3-94577209 or E-mail INSPECTOR-RIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com Free download of documents at blog Http://www.scribd.com/InspectorRikati
8 Governments of all colour will always claim to be running out of monies and for this seek to use tactics to boost their so called “voluntary tax”, as I understand Premier Napthine referred to, however, their mantra is not matched by acting in the interest of the community by keeping their own lavish lifestyles in check and not waste at taxpayers expenses, nor to avoid to increase their own in come and perks well beyond what one could consider to be reasonable and appropriate. As the Framers of the Constitution embedded in the constitution, that those in the Parliament would receive an “allowance” (not a “salary”) and this to be a small compensation for the lost of income from their ordinary daily job, but likely at the end of the day would still be financial worse off, but did so for the honour to serve the people, then what is this about people in State and/or federal government retiring with millions of dollars? How can any State Member of Parliament or for that Federal Member of Parliament constitutionally validly hold a position in the Parliament when engaged in a job of office of profit under the Crown? While the position of Minister of the Crown specifically was excluded from this, it cannot be stated that before they became Ministers and others (not being Ministers) but nevertheless receiving a “salary”, instead of an “allowance”, then are lawfully holding a seat in the Parliament. It is so to say their own greed that invalidate their right to hold a seat in the respective Parliaments. Yet, not any law enforcement official bothers to deal with this elaborate fraud upon us all! And, there are numerous other issues regarding such matters,. Hence I view we must have a VELVET REVOLUTION where we reclaim our constitutional and other legal rights and hold those who defy this legally responsible.
Keep in mind, I didn’t seek this elaborate fight. It was the Police who started it, and others joined in as perhaps to think that they could make me submissive as they do with others. Just that I view our constitution must be respected, even by the crooks in positions of government or law 25 enforcement, as because without compliance to our constitutional provisions and limitations we have nothing less then a dictatorship, tyranny and DEMOCRACY is no more!
Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian Convention) 30 QUOTE Mr. HIGGINS.-Suppose the sentry is asleep, or is in the swim with the other power? Mr. GORDON.-There will be more than one sentry. In the case of a federal law, every member of a state Parliament will be a sentry, and, every constituent of a state Parliament will be a sentry. As regards a law passed by a state, every man in the Federal Parliament will be a sentry, and the whole constituency behind the Federal Parliament will be a sentry. END QUOTE
Our duty is to protect against any inroads upon the constitution, for those who will be depending upon it long after we are gone. Politicians and other law enforcement persons who defy this are 40 not worthy to be considered equal amongst us, and must and shall be dealt with to answer by a competent court of jurisdiction. their tyranny upon the community and others must never be condoned or be seen to be condoned.
This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to set out all issues and or
45 details and neither has anything been stated in order of priority.
Awaiting your response,
G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Friends call me Gerrit)
MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®
Our name is our motto!)
p8 4-9-2013 Sheriff’s Office Ref: COMPLAINT Your Ref: BC/15766 INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0 PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, by fax 0011-61-3-94577209 or E-mail INSPECTOR-RIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com Free download of documents at blog Http://www.scribd.com/InspectorRikati
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue listening from where you left off, or restart the preview.