This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

# Minerals Engineering 17 (2004) 1135–1142 This article is also available online at: www.elsevier.

com/locate/mineng

**Determination of lifter design, speed and ﬁlling eﬀects in AG mills by 3D DEM
**

N. Djordjevic *, F.N. Shi, R. Morrison

Julius Kruttschnitt Mineral Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4068, Australia Received 28 April 2004; accepted 1 June 2004

Abstract The power required to operate large gyratory mills often exceeds 10 MW. Hence, optimisation of the power consumption will have a signiﬁcant impact on the overall economic performance and environmental impact of the mineral processing plant. In most of the published models of tumbling mills (e.g. [Morrell, S., 1996. Power draw of wet tumbling mills and its relationship to charge dynamics, Part 2: An empirical approach to modelling of mill power draw. Trans. Inst. Mining Metall. (Section C: Mineral Processing Ext. Metall.) 105, C54–C62. Austin, L.G., 1990. A mill power equation for SAG mills. Miner. Metall. Process. 57–62]), the eﬀect of lifter design and its interaction with mill speed and ﬁlling are not incorporated. Recent experience suggests that there is an opportunity for improving grinding eﬃciency by choosing the appropriate combination of these variables. However, it is diﬃcult to experimentally determine the interactions of these variables in a full scale mill. Although some work has recently been published using DEM simulations, it was basically limited to 2D. The discrete element code, Particle Flow Code 3D (PFC3D), has been used in this work to model the eﬀects of lifter height (5– 25 cm) and mill speed (50–90% of critical) on the power draw and frequency distribution of speciﬁc energy (J/kg) of normal impacts in a 5 m diameter autogenous (AG) mill. It was found that the distribution of the impact energy is aﬀected by the number of lifters, lifter height, mill speed and mill ﬁlling. Interactions of lifter design, mill speed and mill ﬁlling are demonstrated through three dimensional distinct element methods (3D DEM) modelling. The intensity of the induced stresses (shear and normal) on lifters, and hence the lifter wear, is also simulated. Ó 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Comminution; Grinding; Modelling; DEM

1. Introduction The power required to operate large mills often exceeds 10 MW. Therefore, optimisation of the power utilisation will have a signiﬁcant impact on the overall economic performance and environmental impact of the mineral processing plant. Recent experience suggests that there is an opportunity for improving grinding eﬃ* Corresponding author. Present address: JKMRC, Isles Road, Indooroopilly 4096, Australia. Tel.: +61 7 3365 5888; fax: +61 7 3365 5999. E-mail address: n.djordjevic@uq.edu.au (N. Djordjevic).

ciency by choosing the appropriate combination of mill speed, ﬁlling and lifter design. However, it is diﬃcult to experimentally determine the interactions of these variables in a full scale mill. The discrete element method (DEM) has been proved to be a useful tool in milling simulation and optimisation. A number of papers have been published in the literature by using DEM in modelling and simulation of comminution devices, majority of them being limited in 2D. Hlungwani et al. (2003) used a 2D laboratory ball mill to validate the DEM modelling of liner proﬁle and mill speed eﬀects. Cleary (1998, 2001) used DEM to investigate charge behaviour and power consumption

0892-6875/$ - see front matter Ó 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2004.06.033

1. 3. a force–displacement law to each contact. Power calculated with DEM refers to the net power associated with mill charge. / Minerals Engineering 17 (2004) 1135–1142 in relation to operating conditions. The PFC3D model of the mill is composed of a number of walls which represent mill liner and lifters as well as balls which represents mill charge. is composed of spherical particles in the range 20–150 mm diameter (Table 1). The net-power draw of 1 m thick slice of 5 m diameter mill is modelled in this work. Particle Flow Code 3D (PFC3D) has been used to model the eﬀects of lifter height (5– 25 cm) and mill speed (50–90% of critical) on the power draw and frequency distribution of speciﬁc energy (J/kg) of normal impacts in a 5 m diameter autogenous grinding (AG) mill. Power required to rotate the empty mill (no-load power) cannot be modelled using PFC3D. In the present work. Height Fig. Kn is normal stiﬀness at the contact. where thickness of the slice was 20% of the mill length. The contact force vector between two balls or ball and wall is composed of normal and shear components. 1 and 2). Discrete element modelling Particle Flow Code 3D (ITASCA Inc. 1996). The code keeps a record of individual particles and updates any contact with other particles or walls.. which is deﬁned as the total strain energy stored at all contacts assuming a linear contact-stiﬀness model. and constant updating of the walls positions. Eﬀect of number of lifters on power utilization Previous work (Djordjevic. Net power draw was modelled for the case of mill with 30 identical rectangular shaped lifters. rigid particles are allowed to overlap. a cylindrical tumbling mill could be represented with a vertical slice. liner geometry and charge composition in a 5 m ball mill. Frictional work is deﬁned as the total cumulative energy dissipated by frictional sliding at all contacts. which may be enclosed within a ﬁnite volume by non-deformable walls. 2003) demonstrated that from the point of view of power draw modelling. . PFC3D also includes a slip model. The slip model is deﬁned by the friction coeﬃcient at the contact. The charge of the modelled mill (Figs. At contacts. The energy state of the entire set of particles can be examined by recording various forms of energy. The power of the mill is calculated for each instant of time by summing products of moments applied to the liner and lifters and rotational velocity of the mill. 2. Charge shape for the mill without lifters. The magnitude of the overlap is related to the contact force.1136 N. Un is the relative contact displacement in the normal direction and ni is unit normal vector. with a mill charge volume varying between 7% and 20%. 1999) models the behaviour of particles. mill size and its rotational velocity. In the absence of ﬂuid ﬂow in the mill. The normal contact force vector is calculated using the formula: F n ¼ K n Â U n Â ni where Fn is the normal contact force vector. There overlaps are small relative to the size of the particles. During contact. Each contact is checked for slip conditions. by calculating the maximum allowable shear contact force: F sðmaxÞ ¼ l Â jF n j where l is the friction coeﬃcient. Each calculation step includes application of the NewtonÕs laws of motion to all particles. No-load power is about 5–10% of the gross power draw under typical working conditions (Morrell. where the active relevant friction coeﬃcient is taken to be the minimum friction coeﬃcient of the two contacting entities. with coeﬃcient of friction nil. the behaviour of a material is simulated using a linear contact model. PFC3D modelling is based on the assumption that the individual particles (balls) can be treated as rigid bodies. The trends established from the DEM study will be incorporated in developing a new tumbling mill model at the Julius Kruttschnitt Mineral Research Centre (JKMRC). translational displacements of the charge along the length of the mill are minimal. also limited to the 2D code. Djordjevic et al. The lifter thickness was ﬁxed at 10 cm in all cases. The incremental shear force is calculated using the formula: DF s ¼ ÀK s Â DU s where Ks is the shear stiﬀness at contact and DUs is the incremental shear displacement at contact. The no-load power is determined by the eﬃciency of particular mill design. Intensity of deformation can be assessed using strain energy.

For each lifter geometry. The second phase includes introduction of the mill friction. power draw will be minimal or nil. and to lift the charge which may eventually result in impact breakage. Charge shapes for the mill with lifters of various heights. (c) 10 cm lifters. due to the symmetric shape of the charge around the vertical axis of the mill. but of diﬀerent height. Table 1 Particle size distribution of the modelled mill charge Particle diameter (mm) À150 + 90 À90 + 75 À75 + 53 À53 + 37. In the case of mill without lifters and in which the coeﬃcient of friction is set to zero. The third phase includes introduction of lifters of constant width and number. The essential role of lifters is highlighted by the fact that without them there would be essentially no net-power draw (assuming .5 + 28 À28 + 20 Total Number of particles 96 164 290 684 1336 2378 4948 of the lifters varied between 5 and 25 cm. (b) 5 cm lifters. This can be achieved by calculation of the no-lifters power with a coeﬃcient of friction being set to nil. For each lifter height power draws at diﬀerent mill speeds were determined. 2. and (f) 25 cm lifters. 1. Note that this is not the same as the no-load power in a real mill which requires energy to overcome friction in bearing and losses within mill motor. Djordjevic et al. the eﬀect of each new variable of mill design and operating conditions can be determined. all with a coeﬃcient of friction 0. In the simulations normal and shear stiﬀness of the particles were set 1 · 105 N/m and density 2650 kg/m3. The power draw of the mill comprises the power consumed in rotating the empty mill (no-load power). the rotational velocity of the mill was varied in the range 50–90% of critical speed.5 À37. In order to determine the eﬀect of lifters and mill speed on the eﬀective power draw of the mill it is necessary to determine the power draw without any lifting action ﬁrst. (e) 20 cm lifters. (d) 15 cm lifters. By comparing modelled power draws with those of the no-lifter mill. There is no power being transferred to the charge.3: (a) no-lifter. the power draw of the real mill is only a form of no-load power. It is possible that in such a case. to abrade the charge without lifting the particles.N. Fig. / Minerals Engineering 17 (2004) 1135–1142 1137 Fig.

3). The entire power is consumed through abrasion of the charge and leads to gradual size reduction. the period of free fall and period of bouncing at the base of mill. Particle motion within the mill is diﬀerent with diﬀerent mill ﬁlling levels. while the fraction of the net power that leads to high energy impacts will gradually decrease. 3 for mills with wide range of mill loads. 3. After certain number of lifters a further increase in the number of lifters will not increase net power draw of the mill. In the case of mill with 500 particles (7 vol%). a greater fraction of the power will be used without high intensity impacts. In practice all mills have more than the necessary number .. which leads to an increased ratio of no-lifter net power to net power. Power draw increases from a non-zero value to a stable value. Abrasion breakage dominates for coarse particles and impact breakage is the main mechanism for ﬁne particles. Hence as the charge volume increases. or between particles and mill liners. In the case of a mill which has some ﬁnite eﬀective coeﬃcient of friction (0. eventually followed by the lifting of the particle. 4. free fall and high intensity impact. While this assumption is adequate for industrial mills which operate at load close to maximum load. In the case of a particle within the mill charge. the dominant part of particle motion occurs within the main body of the charge. However. the same relationship is used regardless of the mill ﬁlling and lifter design. While particle is within the charge it becomes subjected to numerous low-intensity force applications which should result in a gradual size reduction due to abrasion. In a current JKMRC SAG mill modelling approach. However dominant part of the introduced net energy into the charge (63%) is consumed through low energy shearing between particles. and that of size reduction with the low intensity abrasion energy is measured through tumbling test. The increased power is consumed in introduction of impacts due to free falling particles as well as faster movement of the particles on top of charge and within the charge. Eﬀect of mill ﬁlling on power utilization The fraction of net-power draw that will be consumed by shearing and abrasion is determined by the charge volume. 5. A key feature of the JKMRC AG/SAG model is that ratio of impact to abrasion breakage varies with size distribution in the mill load. Lifters are able to more eﬃciently transfer motion from the mill shell into the motion of the charge.1138 N.3) and charge which is also characterised with same coeﬃcient of friction. 1996). In the extreme case of single particle. height and mill speed on net power draw The eﬀect of the number of lifters on net power draw is clearly illustrated in Fig. / Minerals Engineering 17 (2004) 1135–1142 nil friction). and characterised by a period when particle is in touch with liner. In the case of mill with 1500 particles (20 vol%) no-lifter power represents 70. Fig. As a result. This perhaps explains why the number of lifters is not included as a parameter in the empirical models of power draw. 3 also shows that as the lifter height increases. 5. motion is essentially highly reproducible. Inﬂuence of lifter number. An increase in lifter height results in a reduced net power draw. this modelling approach is not appropriate in terms of the trends demonstrated in Fig. Fig. an additional 28 kW power is consumed for producing high energy impacts. In such case only this ‘‘no-load’’ power will be drawn and it will be completely wasted. When the same mill is equipped with lifters. the relationship of size reduction and high intensity impact energy is experimentally determined with a drop weight test (Napier-Munn et al. Djordjevic et al. Fig. no-lifter power is about 52% of the net power draw with lifters. the greater fraction of the net power draw will be consumed in the form of charge abrasion and low energy impacts. Hence. the mill will draw additional power for impact breakage and more intensive abrasion. 4. net power draw has a value of 49 kW per unit of length of the modelled mill. This indicates that abrasive action in the form of low energy impacts and shearing between particles and balls within the charge is the prevailing mechanism of power consumption within the mill.5% of total net power of the mill equipped with 5 cm high lifters (Fig. and consequently no comminution. the throughput of the machine will be nil. Net-power consumed by the mill without lifters is referred as no-lifter power. The introduction of 5 cm high lifters increases net power draw to 77 kW per unit length of the modelled mill. Eﬀect of mill ﬁlling on net power utilization.

6 demonstrates that the inﬂuence of lifter height on net power draw increases as the mill rotational velocity increases. investigation in the angle of the loading edge of the lifter is not conducted in this study. 6. 5. (c) 70% critical speed. / Minerals Engineering 17 (2004) 1135–1142 1139 Fig. Inﬂuence of lifter height on net power draw is presented in Fig. Hlungwani et al. The eﬀects of lifter height on net power draw for various mill speeds (5 m mill with 30 lifters). Similar trends have been reported in literature (Cleary. 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2 4 6 10 14 18 22 number of lifters Fig. Pattern of particle motion for the case of mill with singular particle (left) and for the case of mill with 1000 particles (right). of lifters required for onset of steady state power draw. 2001. 4.. (a) 90% critical speed. The mill with low lifters tends to draw higher power than the mill with higher lifters. Fig. 6. Eﬀect of number of lifters on the net power draw (lifter height 20 cm.N. This is due to the fact that propensity for net power draw(kW) net power draw (kW) net power draw (kW) 80 60 40 20 0 5cm 10cm 15cm 20cm 25cm lifter height 80 60 40 20 0 5cm 10cm 15cm 20cm lifter height (cm) 25cm (a) (b) net power draw (kW) 60 40 20 0 5cm 10cm 15cm 20cm lifter height (cm) 25cm net power draw (kW) 80 80 60 40 20 0 5cm 10cm 15cm 20cm lifter height (cm) 25cm (c) (d) Fig. (b) 80% critical speed. 2003). . width 10 cm). and (d) 60% critical speed. Djordjevic et al. Higher lifters will result in more frequent impact events while consuming less power. However. The sensitivity of the power draw to the lifter height is much higher than what might be expected due to change of eﬀective diameter of the mill.

8b.5 time (sec) x10^1 2. The average value of stress was then calculated from the average force and the area of the lifter.2 2. In the case of low lifters (e.8 1.0 0. From the moments and the known distance between lifters plate and centre of rotation. Rotational velocity of the modelled mill is calculated based on the dimension of mill shell. 8a shows that there is a large increase in power draw when particles be- come much smaller than the lifter height (30 cm). resulting in their free fall and high intensity impacts.4 2. Eﬀect of the particle size on the net power draw of the mill. 7.2 1. The mill charge is composed of mono size particles. Resultant force time history for the case of 5 cm high lifters (left) and 15 cm high lifters.5 3.0 2.2 1. showing the time history of the resultant force acting on a single particle of 10 cm diameter (within the charge) for the mill equipped with 5 and 15 cm high lifters respectively.e.4 1. Djordjevic et al. / Minerals Engineering 17 (2004) 1135–1142 force (N) x10^3 3.2 2.0 1.0 2.0 Fig. and for a plate corresponding to the ﬂat top of the lifter.0 1. as shown in Fig. In addition to that. the eﬀect of lifter height on power draw is insigniﬁcant.0 1. when the ratio of the lifter height to particle diameter is kept constant (i. (a) Constant lifter height 30 cm and (b) lifter height = 80% particle diameter. ignoring height of the lifters.6 2. 8.4 1. the average forces that are acting on a particle are much smaller than that with higher lifters (e.2 0. height = 80% of the diameter). .5 1.5 3. However.6 0. the impact of particle diameter on the power draw becomes insigniﬁcant. the average force was calculated.5 1. net-power draw (kW) 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 80 100 150 200 240 300 particle diameter (mm) net-power draw (kW) 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 80 100 150 200 240 300 particle diameter (mm) (a) (b) Fig. As the probability of centrifuge is minimal for a slower velocity.g.6 0. Considering that stresses are averaged over the entire surface of the lifter. 7.0 1. the inﬂuence of the lifter height on power draw is signiﬁcant.6 1. as the modern mills often operate at about 75% of critical speed or higher.6 2. the most signiﬁcant factor is the mass of the particles. Stresses applied to the lifters were calculated from the moments acting on the lifter plates.5 time (sec) x10^1 2. the active force is a shear component of the predominantly vertical force induced by the mass of superimposed particles and the centrifugal force. in the case of higher lifters there is a much higher probability that particles will be lifted. 3.1140 resultant force (N) x10^3 N.0 2.4 0.0 0. 15 cm).0 2.4 0. centrifuge will increase with the increases of lifter height and mill speed. The impact of particle size on the net power draw is clearly highlighted in Fig.0 0. Fig. 6. However. 8. The stresses on the lifter were modelled for the case of vertical plate with the active side facing the charge.8 1.4 2.0 0.8 0.8 2.g. This is illustrated in Fig. 5 cm). The force that opposes the motion of the vertical side of the lifter will predominantly act perpendicular to the plate.6 1. On the top of the lifter.8 0.8 2. Intensity of stresses acting on lifters The lifter wear is directly proportional to the intensity of the induced stresses acting on the lifters. Inﬂuence of the lifter height can also be observed through the intensity of forces that are acting on typical particles within the mill.0 0. In all discussions about the power draw of the mills it is important to consider the nature of the charge size distribution.2 0.

The higher stresses will cause higher initial wear rates. the following conclusions may be drawn from the DEM simulations of the interactions of lifter design. 11. 10. particularly the stresses that act on top of the lifters. Fig. The results show that an increase of lifter height results in an increased intensity of stresses that are acting on the lifter. a large number of balls will be superimposed which will result in higher forces and stresses acting on the lifters. Fig. Conclusions In summary. Djordjevic et al. starting from relatively modest impact energy (2 J). The stresses acting perpendicular to the lifting side are higher in magnitude than the shear stresses acting along the top of the lifter. the number of impacts per second for the two lifters case drops at a much higher rate than for the mills with 14 and 22 lifters. .1 J) for a mill with only two lifters is the highest. Fig. The number of very low energy impacts (0. A decrease the number of lifter leads to an increase the proportion of low intensity abrasion. Intensity of normal stresses for the cases of 25-cm-height lifters (left) and 5-cm-height lifters respectively. The eﬀect of the lifter height on the intensity of stresses that are acting on the lifters was also investigated. The interaction of forces with the lifters results in variable induced stress. 11 shows the normal stresses induced to the lifters with 25 and 5 cm height respectively. 9. resulting in a decrease of their height and reduction of milling eﬃciency.N. As a result. 9. / Minerals Engineering 17 (2004) 1135–1142 1141 Fig. The higher lifters will be exposed to the higher average stresses. mill speed and charge ﬁlling on energy utilisation in an AG mill: • Increasing a number of lifters leads to increase the proportion of high intensity impacts. 7. As the number of lifters increases. 10. Fig. Hence. However. stresses acting on the vertical side of the rectangular shaped lifter will be mostly in a perpendicular–normal direction. while stresses acting on the top of lifter will be predominantly shear stresses. as shown in Fig. Impacts energy distribution. rate of further height reduction should slow down. due to the higher pile of the particles that are lifted. both normal and shear stresses decrease. Inﬂuence of number of lifters on the stress intensity applied on lifters. The modelled stresses show signiﬁcant variation in stress intensity during each lifter revolution. Increasing the numbers of lifters will also alter the impact energy frequency spectrum of the mill. This ﬁnding is in agreement with in situ observations that severity of lifter wear decreases with increase in the number of lifters. As the lifter height decreases due to wear. Shear stresses will be responsible for the gradual wear of the lifters.

. 2003. 16. Morrison. but decreases high energy impact breakage.. C109–C114. power draw. J. the mill draws more power with lower lifter height. the mill draws more power when grinding smaller particles. At constant ratio of lifter height to particle size. Their operation and optimisation. Brisbane. 1999.. Charge behaviour and power consumption in ball mills: sensitivity to mill operating conditions... Cleary.. O. / Minerals Engineering 17 (2004) 1135–1142 • An increase the number of lifters leads to an increase the net power draw..1142 N. Miner. 63. but draws less power with higher lifters. S.W. Metall. Process. 79–114. 1996. 2003. Further validation of DEM modelling of milling: eﬀects of liner proﬁle and mill speed. Process.) 112.D. Int. P. Inst. Mining Metall. 1996.. a further increase in the number of lifters will not result in a signiﬁcant further reduction of stress intensity. • Less number of lifters and greater lifter height result in the greater stress intensity applied to the lifters. T. Mineral comminution circuits. the inﬂuence of particle size on mill power is not signiﬁcant. Julius Kruttschnitt Mineral Research Centre. Minnesota. • An increase mill ﬁlling leads to an increase the proportion of energy used for the low energy abrasion breakage. (Section C: Miner. Predicting charge motion. Itasca Consulting Group Inc.. • At constant lifter height. Kojovic. Ext. Ext. Djordjevic.J. R. causing faster lifters/liners wears. Eng. PFC3D Particle Flow Code in 3 Dimensions. Inst. Miner. H. • As the rotational speed increases. Morrell. Moys. Part 2: An empirical approach to modelling of mill power draw. 2001. 1998. N. After a certain number of lifters are reached. Hlungwani.. T. References Cleary.H. M. Dong. Minneapolis. segregation. Discrete element modelling of power draw of tumbling mills. Djordjevic et al. (Section C: Miner. 993–998..) 105. . wear and particle breakage in ball mills using discrete element methods. Miner. Napier-Munn. Metall. Trans. 11 (11).W. 1061–1080. Power draw of wet tumbling mills and its relationship to charge dynamics. C54–C62. P. J. Eng.. Trans. Rikhotso. Mining Metall. but only up to a stable value. Process. Morrell. liner geometry and charge composition.. S.