1.3K views

Uploaded by James A. Montanye

This paper argues that the ancient Babylonian number system emerged from the need of ordinary individuals to maximize the range of magnitudes that could be represented on the fingers of two hands.
Babylonian, number system, sexagesimal, base 60, arithmetic, mathematics

save

- Babylonian Egyptian Math
- Curs Lexicologie
- state standards for math
- 1 l 4 Square Root Division
- Math Layout
- Maths Magic
- Upcat Math 1
- multiplying rational numbers
- Sudbury Family Math Guide Grades 3 - 5
- copyof5thgradeformativeassessmentdata
- 9781431522958_Technical Mathematics Grade 10.epub
- 0x7=0 1x7=7 2 x 7 = 14 3 x 7
- syllabus
- Adding and Subtracting Fractions Worksheets.doc
- Project Algeb
- Significant Figures
- 3 - Magia de La Sub-Sutra
- Untitled
- GENDER-2
- Tricks to Learning Multiplication Tables
- interjections.docx
- Square Roots
- LECSICOL.pdf
- Lecture 4
- Fractions
- 01 Teaching Guide - Business Math_Fractions (ABM_BM11FO-Ia-1)_TE.docx
- 8 REEXAM
- Number System
- grade3 fluency brochure
- 6 Half Full Subs Tractor
- Marshall Sahlins-Waiting for Foucault, Still.pdf
- ringkas frakture.docx
- Toplentino vs. Secretary of Finance
- Desarrollo psicomotor
- Arruru Tejano - Ulloa
- Lettres Majuscules CE1 (1)
- Jadwal Kegiatan Penyuluhan Pada Pasien Rawat Jalan Bulan Maret 2017
- Apostila Redacao Enem - Debora Marasca
- Pandu An
- modul2
- Lampiran 3-Tabel Distribusi x2
- Per Amor Dell'Arte e Delle Lettere- vol. 2.pptx
- Texto Apelativo Sas
- 4 Program Semester Pdto x
- El Ejercicio No Solo Sirve Para Bajar de Peso y Moldear El Cuerpo
- Fallo de La Corte Suprema en Contra de La ANSeS Por El Indice de Actualizacion de Las Jubilaciones
- dalil doa.docx
- SOP ASMA REGGA.docx
- Acidez titulable de furtivas
- OMG document.docx
- Serabi Kinca
- 5 Calculo y Dimensionado de Vigas (Estructuras Hiper Estaticas)
- Capítulo 4
- Métaux Alcalins
- SKRIPSI PUSAT KARIR STT WASTUKANCANA
- Im Missing Him
- Arghezi-Universul-Poetic.doc
- Mydea Ratna P_15330009_Interaksi Pada Proses Metabolisme.pptx
- Check List-Pressurization Unit
- Upaya Kesehatan Indra, Jiwa & Tradisional Klp4
- Scarcity, Consciousness, and the Nature of the Self
- Other Economics and Religion Articles
- A Wonderful Day for an Auto-da-fe
- Religion as Economics, Philosophy, and Social Psychology
- Merdecracy Redux
- In the Beginning Was the Word, And It Wasn't Obamacare
- David Brooks on "The Blindness of Social Wealth"
- Personalities Aside: Understanding the Kavanaugh Confirmation Battle
- Up From Scarcity: The Groundwork of the Economics of Morality and Religion
- Compromise: The Ultimate Political Bait-and-Switch
- Ngrams: The New Tool for Social Research
- A Theory of the Rights Concept
- Morality, Altruism, and Religion in Economics Perspective
- Philosophy and Religion: From Delos to Adam Smith
- Social Capital and the Decline of the West
- Obamapeace: Building Upon a Shameful Legacy
- Health Care Reform and the Fourth Amendment
- Sharing the Wealth: An Introduction to Political Biology
- Beyond Death and Taxes
- The Economics of Evolution and Morality
- Faith and Reason-A Darwinian Synthesis
- The Great Gingrich Campaign Sale
- The Political Economy of Religion in the Public Sphere
- Civilization Without Romance
- Single Payer Health Care Reform
- Book Review – Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why it Matters for Global Capitalism
- The Foundations of Prosperity and Economic Growth
- In Tribute to Helen Thomas
- Checks, Balances, And Individual Mandates

You are on page 1of 5

of the Babylonian Number System

James A. Montanye

**Abstract – The author argues that the ancient Babylonian number system
**

emerged from the need of ordinary individuals to maximize the range of

magnitudes that could be represented on the fingers of two hands.

umerologists, anthropologists, archaeologists, historians, and mathematicians ponder the

**S peculiarities of the ancient Babylonian number system, whose most primitive origin so far
**

has escaped positive explanation. The historian Daniel Boorstin, commenting on the origin of the

twenty-four hour day, described the puzzle in this way:

**The Egyptians...apparently chose this number [twenty-four] because they used the
**

sexagesimal system of numbers, based on multiples of six and powers of sixty,

which had been developed by the Babylonians. This pushes the mystery back into

earlier centuries, for we have no clear explanation of why the Babylonians built

their arithmetic as they did. But their use of the number sixty seems to have had

nothing to do with astronomy or the movement of heavenly bodies. (Boorstin

1983, 41)

Pace Boorstein, math historians speculate that astronomy and geometry are likely sources for the

sexagesimal number base:

**The assumption of Babylonian astronomers that the year had 360 days is very
**

likely the origin of measuring angles in degrees; the fact that the angles of

equilateral triangles are 60 degrees may explain, in part, the sexagesimal method

of counting. (Gullberg 1997, 364)

Other investigators consider anatomical explanations:

**Anthropological and archaeological studies of human culture have found the
**

common number bases to be 2, 5, 10, and somewhat less frequently 20. These

correlate nicely with features of the human anatomy. ... Put another way, people

had bodily references in case their arithmetic failed them. But why 60? (Dunham

1994, 184)

Sumerologists assert that the sexagesimal (base-60, or “powers of 60”) system arose to meet the

empirical needs of the Mesopotamian state, especially for public administration and astronomical

calculations:

**Throughout the third millennium, counting and measuring systems were gradually
**

revised in response to the demands of large-scale state bureaucracies. This

development led in the end to the sexagesimal, or base 60, place value system ...

(Robson 1999, Preface)

**Nothing in this explanation addresses the earlier “multiples of 6” (base-6) number system.
**

Neither does it explain the sexagesimal system’s longevity and its many task-specific variations

(Nissen and others 1993; Robson 2008), despite the system being at once awkward, prone to

error, and employing separate number bases for computation (base-60) and record-keeping

(base-10):

**[C]alculations in sexagesimal notation were made on temporary tablets which
**

were then moistened and erased for reuse after the calculation had been

transferred to an archival document in standard [i.e., decimal] notation. (qtd. in

Robson 1999, 171)

**The sexagesimal place value system was used only for calculating with integers
**

and simple fractions; the absolute decimal system was preferred for recording, and

unit fractions were often used for metrologies. Reciprocals and division were

avoided by using trial-and-error multiplication even where, in other periods,

reciprocals of sexagesimally regular numbers were easily found. (Robson 2008,

212)

**Reconciling these disparate observations requires a positive explanation of the ancient system’s
**

origin and evolution.

A useful method for developing positive theory lies in the economist’s as if postulate that

rationality gives rise to efficient social instruments of all sorts, including number systems.

Subsequent institutionalization transforms these instruments, both for better and for worse, by

adapting them for administrative convenience and corrupting them to confer private,

entrepreneurial advantage (Quigley 1979; Scott 1998). This faceted perspective implies that the

base-6 number system was the consequence of rational thought and pre-political action. The

-2-

subsequent emergence of a Babylonian state bureaucracy necessitated a more powerful number

system, which created, in turn, a class of professional mathematicians (Robson 2008) whose

income and social status depended upon the arcana of sexagesimal calculation. Hence the

system’s longevity and evolved complexity.

The rational choice view fosters a positive explanatory hypothesis that fits the facts

exactly. The result is not merely a “rational reconstruction” of ancient texts, an exercise

disparaged by professional Sumerologists (Robson 2001). Rather, it represents a bootstrapped

understanding of a math phenomenon that predates recorded history.

The Hypothesis

Rationality and efficiency in the context of Babylonian antiquity is judged according to

the needs of a pre-literate and pre-numerate civilization that almost certainly used fingers for

counting, calculating, and displaying magnitudes. A base-6 number system would have been the

most useful system in this context because it permits magnitudes in the range of 1-35 to be

represented conveniently on two hands of five fingers each. A decimal (base-10) system, by

comparison, limits finger arithmetic to magnitudes in the range of 1-10. A third possibility is a

truly “digital” base-2 (or “powers of 2”) system that represents a broad range of magnitudes on

ten fingers (i.e., 210 = 1,024), but is impractical because its application requires both extreme

mental computing ability and the finger dexterity of a street mime.

A simple proof confirms that a base-6 number system – which progresses naturally in

“multiples of six” over the range encompassed by 10 fingers – maximizes the magnitude that can

be represented using an x-multiple counting scheme. The magnitude m that can be represented on

two hands of five fingers each is given by the equation

m = (10 - x + 1)x + (x - 1).

Differentiation gives the maximizing equation

m'(x) = -2x + 12 = 0

proving that 6 is the value of x that maximizes m. Finger-based experimentation (as described

below) yields the same result. Different maximizing values of x can result if finger orientation

-3-

(e.g., the up/down scheme used by commodities pit-traders) is taken into account. The

Babylonian system’s number bases of six and sixty imply that finger orientation was irrelevant.

Finger counting in base-6 notation is straightforward. Whereas decimal arithmetic

represents magnitudes by placing digits in the position of “units” and “tens,” base-6 arithmetic

places them in the position of “units” and “sixes.” Some examples illustrate the mechanics. Let

the fingers of one hand represent unit values 1-5, while fingers of the other hand represent

multiples of 6 (or “carries”). The magnitude 5, for example, is represented by no (zero) fingers on

the “sixes” hand and five fingers on the “units” hand ([0 x 6] + [5 x 1] = 5). The magnitude 6 is

represented by one finger (or the thumb) on the “sixes” hand and no (zero) fingers on the “units”

hand ([1 x 6] + [0 x 1] = 6). The magnitude 20 is represented by three fingers on the “sixes” hand

and two fingers on the “units” hand ([3 x 6] + [2 x 1) = 20). And so on. A magnitude as large as

35 can be represented in this fashion ([5 x 6] + [5 x 1] = 35). The much later Roman custom of

designating “units” and “tens” with the left hand, and “hundreds” and “thousands” with the right

hand confirms the scheme’s practicability.

A base-6 counting system cannot represent fractionally small values and values greater

than 35, and so is unsuitable for advanced applications. Sexagesimal calculation (base-60, or 10

multiples of 6) increased the power of ancient arithmetic, as the Babylonian’s prowess with

mathematical astronomy attests (Swerdlow 1998). The sexagesimal system nevertheless was

prone to error and ambiguity because (i) notation was relatively cumbersome, (ii) computation

and recording required extensive numerical ability, study, practice, and diligence (Dunham 1994,

183-4; Gullberg 1997, 56-7; Robson 2008), and (iii) the system embodied no concept of (or

character for) zero as a place-holder and trailing digit. These difficulties pressured the evolution of

a more tractable system. The first adaptation may have been to decimalize (i.e., to transform into

“standard notation”) the results of sexagesimal calculations (Nissen and others, 1993; Robson

1999 and 2008). Decimal arithmetic eventually replaced the ancient system in its entirety.

Conclusion

A rational and efficient number system arises and evolves within an environmental

context. The ancient sexagesimal (base-60) number system developed from an older base-6

-4-

system of finger counting. Decimal (base-10) arithmetic replaced the sexagesimal system, and

largely has been replaced in turn by digital (base-2) electronic calculations that are represented as

decimal and hexadecimal (base-16) values.

References

Boorstin, Daniel. 1983. The Discoverers. New York: Random House.

Dunham, William. 1994. The Mathematical Universe. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Gullberg, Jan. 1997. Mathematics: From the Birth of Numbers. New York: Norton.

**Nissen, Hans, Peter Damarow, and Robert Englund. 1993. Archaic Bookkeeping: Early Writing
**

and Techniques of Economic Administration in the Ancient Near East. Chicago: University of

Chicago Press.

**Quigley, Carroll. 1979. The Evolution of Civilizations: An Introduction to Historical Analysis,
**

2d. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

**Robson, Eleanor. 2008. Mathematics in Ancient Iraq: A Social History. Princeton: Princeton
**

University Press.

**–––. 2001. ‘Neither Sherlock Holmes nor Babylon: A Reassessment of Plimpton 322.’ Historica
**

Mathematica 28, pp. 167-206.

**–––. 1999. Mesopotamian Mathematics, 2100-1600 BC: Technical Constraints in Bureaucracy
**

and Education. Oxford Editions of Cuneiform Texts, Vol. XIV. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

**Scott, James. 1998. Seeing Like A State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human
**

Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.

**Swerdlow, N.M. 1998. The Babylonian Theory of the Planets. Princeton: Princeton University
**

Press.

-5-

- Babylonian Egyptian MathUploaded byTopspinShot
- Curs LexicologieUploaded bymesinaanna
- state standards for mathUploaded byapi-242013201
- 1 l 4 Square Root DivisionUploaded byTiang Chun Xian
- Math LayoutUploaded byKimberly Emerson Reed
- Maths MagicUploaded byDR. BASANT KUMAR GUPTA
- Upcat Math 1Uploaded byMary Ann Amparo
- multiplying rational numbersUploaded byapi-310055811
- Sudbury Family Math Guide Grades 3 - 5Uploaded byspslearning
- copyof5thgradeformativeassessmentdataUploaded byapi-236897542
- 9781431522958_Technical Mathematics Grade 10.epubUploaded bySandhya Chowdary
- 0x7=0 1x7=7 2 x 7 = 14 3 x 7Uploaded byhaolhu
- syllabusUploaded byapi-365035150
- Adding and Subtracting Fractions Worksheets.docUploaded byCaroline Deniega Sandoval
- Project AlgebUploaded byRheyniel Flores
- Significant FiguresUploaded byAli Habib
- 3 - Magia de La Sub-SutraUploaded byPablo Etcheverry
- UntitledUploaded byapi-161714983
- GENDER-2Uploaded byMarko
- Tricks to Learning Multiplication TablesUploaded byPuja Mazumdar
- interjections.docxUploaded byMitchelle Pasquin
- Square RootsUploaded byJeffreyCHL
- LECSICOL.pdfUploaded byGeorge
- Lecture 4Uploaded byteddy berhanu
- FractionsUploaded byniranjankumar79
- 01 Teaching Guide - Business Math_Fractions (ABM_BM11FO-Ia-1)_TE.docxUploaded byTheresa Sarah Ayessa Galang
- 8 REEXAMUploaded byKamala Rajshekar
- Number SystemUploaded byRensieViqueFalculan
- grade3 fluency brochureUploaded byapi-219223348
- 6 Half Full Subs TractorUploaded bySohil Vohra

- Scarcity, Consciousness, and the Nature of the SelfUploaded byJames A. Montanye
- Other Economics and Religion ArticlesUploaded byJames A. Montanye
- A Wonderful Day for an Auto-da-feUploaded byJames A. Montanye
- Religion as Economics, Philosophy, and Social PsychologyUploaded byJames A. Montanye
- Merdecracy ReduxUploaded byJames A. Montanye
- In the Beginning Was the Word, And It Wasn't ObamacareUploaded byJames A. Montanye
- David Brooks on "The Blindness of Social Wealth"Uploaded byJames A. Montanye
- Personalities Aside: Understanding the Kavanaugh Confirmation BattleUploaded byJames A. Montanye
- Up From Scarcity: The Groundwork of the Economics of Morality and ReligionUploaded byJames A. Montanye
- Compromise: The Ultimate Political Bait-and-SwitchUploaded byJames A. Montanye
- Ngrams: The New Tool for Social ResearchUploaded byJames A. Montanye
- A Theory of the Rights ConceptUploaded byJames A. Montanye
- Morality, Altruism, and Religion in Economics PerspectiveUploaded byJames A. Montanye
- Philosophy and Religion: From Delos to Adam SmithUploaded byJames A. Montanye
- Social Capital and the Decline of the WestUploaded byJames A. Montanye
- Obamapeace: Building Upon a Shameful LegacyUploaded byJames A. Montanye
- Health Care Reform and the Fourth AmendmentUploaded byJames A. Montanye
- Sharing the Wealth: An Introduction to Political BiologyUploaded byJames A. Montanye
- Beyond Death and TaxesUploaded byJames A. Montanye
- The Economics of Evolution and MoralityUploaded byJames A. Montanye
- Faith and Reason-A Darwinian SynthesisUploaded byJames A. Montanye
- The Great Gingrich Campaign SaleUploaded byJames A. Montanye
- The Political Economy of Religion in the Public SphereUploaded byJames A. Montanye
- Civilization Without RomanceUploaded byJames A. Montanye
- Single Payer Health Care ReformUploaded byJames A. Montanye
- Book Review – Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why it Matters for Global CapitalismUploaded byJames A. Montanye
- The Foundations of Prosperity and Economic GrowthUploaded byJames A. Montanye
- In Tribute to Helen ThomasUploaded byJames A. Montanye
- Checks, Balances, And Individual MandatesUploaded byJames A. Montanye