Ole Roemer 1676 light constant velocity hypothesis historical mistake (1973

)

Greetings: My name is Joe Nahhas and I am the founder of real time physics.
Real time physics is hacking nature "without a least of doubt and incontestable proof" physics.

Abstract: In 1676 an astrologer by the name of Ole Roemer proposed a hypothesis that light
velocity is constant and claimed to had measured light velocity using Jupiter moon Io and came up with a number to be equal to c = 299, 792, 458 meters per second (current NIST published number) based on the constant areal velocity work of a previous astrologer named Johannes Kepler. In 1905 a desk clerk by the name of Albert Einstein repeated what Ole Roemer said that light velocity is constant velocity. Light constant velocity or the idea of two travelers going in the same direction at light speed c = 299, 792, 458 meters per second and their relative velocity is not equal to zero but equal to c = 299, 792, 458 meters per second and two traveler going in opposite directions at light velocity and their relative velocity is not 2 c = 2 x (299, 792, 458) but equal to c is not science or scientific. The number c = 299, 792, 458 meters per second is not a measurement of light velocity but a measurement of an artifact light velocity number like all 500 years of western civilization modern + Nobel Prize winner artifacts physics laws and experimental numbers and a "without a least of doubt and incontestable proof" that the number c = 299,792, 458 is light artifact velocity and not light velocity is the subject of this article and I dare all! Table of contents: 1 - Artifact time two equations 2 - Light artifact velocity derivation and calculation 3- Without a least of doubt and incontestable proof and conclusion Page 1

1 - Artifacts time two equations 1 =1 is self evident; 2= 2 is self evident; A = A is self evident; B = B is self evident A = A; add and subtract B; then, A = B + (A - B); divide by B (A/B) = 1 + (A - B)/B; multiply by D (A/B) D = D + [(A - B)/B] D --------------------------------- Equation - 1 C = C is self evident; D = D is self evident Or C = C; add and subtract D C = D + (C - D) ----------------------------------------------- Equation - 2 Comparing equations 1 and 2 yields, (1) AC = BD; (2) D = D; and (3) C - D = [(A - B)/B] D ----------------------------------------Equation - 3 Or (C - D)/D = (A - B)/B Or Δ D/D = Δ B/B; Divide by Δ t (1/D) (Δ D/ Δ t) = (1/B) (Δ B/ Δ t) Limit [(1/D) (Δ D/ Δ t)] = Limit [(1/B) (Δ B/ Δ t)] = (λ + í ω) Δt 0 Δt 0

Or, d B/B = (λ + í ω) d t and B = B0 e (λ + í ω) t = A e (λ + í ω) t B = A e (λ + í ω) t.

Distance is A; real time distance is B = A e (λ + í ω) t
In general distance: r = r0 e (λ + í ω) t Constant velocity of light makes time With r = c T = r0 (λ + í ω) t = cT0 (λ + í ω) t; r = c T; r0= c T0 Einstein's error of time: Line time; λ = 0 and T = T0 í ω t -------------------------------------------------------------------- I Page 2

T = T x + ί Ty = T0 [cosine ω t + ί sine ω t] Along the line of sight: T x = T0 cosine ω t ----------------------------------- (1)
Kepler law of constant Areal velocity: d (r²θ')/d t = 0; r²θ' = h And 2 r' θ' + r θ"= 0 Separate the variables: 2 r' θ' = - r θ" Or 2(r'/r) = - (θ"/θ') = - 2 (λ + í ω) Then: (r'/r) = λ + í ω Or d r/r = (λ + í ω) d t Then r = r 0 ℮ (λ + ì ω) t With - (θ"/θ') = - 2 (λ + í ω) Then θ' = θ'0 ℮ -2 (λ + ì ω) t Eq-2

Or, 2 π/T = 2 π/T0 ℮

-2 (λ + ì ω )

t

Kepler's error of time: λ= 0; T = T0 2 í ω t ------------------------- II Einstein's error of time: λ= 0; T = T0 ℮ í ω t Einstein's error along the line of sight: T = T x + ί Ty= T0 cosine ω t + ί T0 sine ω t Along the line of sight: T x = T0 cosine ω t ---------------------------------- (1) Kepler's error along the line of sight: T = T x + ί Ty= T0 cosine 2ω t + ί T0 sine 2ω t Along the line of sight: T x = T0 cosine 2 ω t --------------------------------- (2) From (2) T x -T0 = - 2 T0 sine 2 ω t --------------------------------------- (3) From (1) T x -T0 = - 2 T0 sine 2 (ω t/2) ---------------------------------- (4)
Artifacts time two equations: I - T = T0 í ω t; II - T = T0 2 í ω t

Page 3

2 - Light artifact velocity derivation and calculation Earth as a physics lab looking into far away objects like Ole Roemer did when he presented his hypothesis in 1676 looking at Jupiter moon Io that has a visual orbital period of 1.769137788 days (NASA's data) is a spinning moving sphere that has an atmosphere, a spinning period of one day and an orbital period of 365.256 days (NASA's data). In all of published physics there is not one publication where Earth's actual motion is mentioned. All published physics about planet Earth's motion is relativistic motion or artifact motion. All there is in the Universe is material objects assigned a number called density d or mass m to differentiate the material object from empty space at a location r called distance. Physics is a study of the product S = m r and the changes in the product of S along human abstract scale called time t. A - Take any published physics law published by any physicist from any period of time in human history and display the physics law in two different time frames and the displayed results is subtracted from one another and the ratio is calculated to find physics artifacts ratio and a surprise of one and only one numerical answer= 0.607500428 B - Take any published physics law published by any physicist from any period of time in human history and decipher the experimental data and it will be a surprise combination of four numbers I - Air density (mass) = 1.225 kg/m3 (Engineering Tool box) II - Earth's sidereal period = 86164.09943 seconds III - Air index of refraction = 1.000293 IV - Artifact ratio = 0.607500428 For example: Newton's gravitational law F = G m M/r2

G = 6.67384 x 10-11 (NIST - Data)
The dimensions of [G] = 1/ (density) (time) 2 And G = 0.607500428/ [d a (Te) 2] (n a) 3 G = 0.607500428/ [1.225 (86164.09943) 2] (1.000293) 3 C - The artifact ratio 0.607500428 comes from?

Earth does move around the Sun
Page 4

1- Earth moves in a circle in 27.321 days (lunar period) and the sun moves in another circle in 365.256 days (Earth's period) 2 - Earth's circle motion in 27.321 days and the Sun's circle motion in 365.256 days are not synchronized motions 3 - Not synchronized motions produce visual artifacts 4 - The artifacts value is calculated as follows I - (365.256/27.321) =13.39605677 II- 13.36905677 - 13 (complete cycles) = 0.36905677 III - Circular artifacts is the square root of 0.36905677 = 0.607500428

Earth and Sun are spinning spheres with atmospheres

Sun

Earth

Celestial objects like the Moon, Mercury and Venus has no atmosphere

Moon

Mercury

Venus

Moon: No atmosphere

Mercury: No atmosphere Page 5

Venus: Insignificant atmosphere

Sun

Earth

Atmosphere - Spin

Atmosphere - spin

Moon

Mercury

Venus

No atmosphere and no spin

No atmosphere and no spin

No atmosphere - no spin

Sun

Earth

Atmosphere = spin + Circle motion

Atmosphere = spin + Circle motion

Moon

Mercury

Venus

No atmosphere = no spin = no circle motion = bum Moon Mercury and Venus Page 6

Kepler was a Christian Astrologer who looked at astronomical data to predict
its impact on human life like an astrologer does guided by Christianity belief of a "Center of Universe". Kepler's laws came from astronomical data that came from two others Christians Nicolaus Copernicus and Tyco Brahe. Astrologer Kepler inherited and practiced his Christian belief astrology that carried two holly ideas of "center"

Johannes Kepler

Nicolaus Copernicus

Tyco Brahe's

(1) Christianity idea of "Center of Universe" featured in 15th century Church/ Copernicus duel. Nicolaus Copernicus and the Catholic Church fight was about a "center of Universe" and ended with a shift of the "center of Universe" from Earth to the Sun. Center of Universe and not "center of motion" was the central idea on the market in 15th century

(2) Christianity idea of "Center of Universe data fit" of Clergy Tyco Brahe and not "center of motion data fit". Kepler analyzed Tyco Brahe's data to fit an already on the market idea of "Center of Universe/Sun data fit" and not "center of motion data fit" Page 7

Result: relativistic measurements = measuring the motion of one object (planet) around another object (Sun/center of Universe) from a third Place (Earth) or Kepler's ellipse

Earth

Aphelion = a (1+ ε)

Sun

θ Perihelion = a (1 - ε)

Moon

Aphelion = a (1+ ε)

Earth

θ Perihelion = a (1 - ε)

Page 8

1 -Nicolaus Copernicus: Planets revolve around the Sun in circles
P

Sun

2 -Astrologer Kepler said Planets revolve around the Sun in an ellipse

P

r

Aphelion = a (1+ ε)

Sun

θ

a

Perihelion = a (1 - ε)

Page 9

Newton's said the reason Planets revolve around the Sun is due action at a distance or gravity expressed by Newton's gravitational equation: F = - G m M/r2; r > 0 Where m = a planet mass; M = Sun mass; r = distance between the Sun and Planet and G = a constant number = gravitational constant = 6.67384 x 10-11
Earth

Sun

Action at a distance: Sun swinging Earth around!
Or, r = a (1 - ε2)/ (1 + ε cosine θ); definition of an ellipse -------- I Newton's solution

Le Verrier said the ellipse axis rotates and the rate of rotation is 43 seconds of an arc per century

Page 10

Einstein said to have a different look at space and time. Sand up = sand down

Space = velocity x time
Space (sand up) = velocity x time (sand down)

If velocity is constant c Then; Space = c x time
If you can travel in space, then you can travel in time but at a different rate

Nature is space - time and not just space analyzed by time
Planet Mercury travel in space 70.75 arc seconds per century Also planet Mercury travel in time 43 arc seconds per century For that reason a time force in space form should be added to Newton's force equation Einstein's added a time force to Newton's space force and modified Newton's equation: Newton's space force equation: F = - G m M/r2 gives an ellipse Einstein's space - time force equation: F = - G m M/r2 + k1/ r4 The solution to this equation: r = a (1 - ε2)/ [1 + ε cosine (θ - Ψ) gives a rotating ellipse Page 11

It is a fact that Astronomers see this axis tilt and Einstein got a formula for it:
Ψ = {6 π G M/a c² (1 - ε²)} [180/ π] [36526/T (days)] [3600]

G = 6.67384 x 10-11= gravitational acceleration constant M = 2x1030kg = mass of the Sun Eccentricity of Mercury’s orbit = ε = 0.2056 T= 88 days = period of Planet mercury’s rotation around the Sun And c = 299792.458 km/sec =light speed/sec And a = 58.2 x 106 km/sec = semi major axis of planet Mercury orbit
Ψ = {6 (π) 6.67384 x 10-11 (2 x 1030)/58.2 x 106 (299792.458) ² x

[1– (0.2056)²]} x [180/ π] [36526/88] [3600] = 43 seconds of an arc per century.
In Short: Einstein added a time force in space form k1/ r4

Newton's force space equation: F = - G m M/r2
Newton's Ellipse r = a (1 - ε2)/ (1 + ε cosine θ)

Einstein's force space - time equation: F = - G m M/r2 + k1/ r4 Einstein's rotating ellipse: r = a (1 - ε2)/ [1 + ε cosine (θ - Ψ)
Ψ = {6 π G M/a c² (1 - ε²)} [180/ π] [36526/T (days)] [3600] = 43 arc seconds per century

Newton's - space ----------------Nobel - Einstein's space - time Compared to Planet Moon and Plant Mercury and Planet Venus are Bums? It is very simple solution! Page 12

Earth's physical reality
27.321 days
E

r0
-a
θ Center

Sun's physical reality
365.256 days
S

r0
-a
θ Center

Page 13

Modern + Nobel Prize winner physics Universe

Mercury 87.96 days Venus Sun 224.68days Moon 27.321 days Earth 365.256 days

Real time hacking of nature

Venus Bum

Mercury Bum

Sun Moon Bum Earth

Sun circle motion in365.256 days period and Earth circle motion in 27.321 days period. To start with: Page 14

Two circles not in Synchronous relative motion is a Kepler visual ellipse Astrologer Kepler said Planets revolve around the Sun in an ellipse Western civilization 500 years assertion is Kepler's ellipse

r

P E

Aphelion = a (1+ ε)

Sun

θ

a

Perihelion = a (1 - ε)

Joe Nahhas Vs western civilization

Sun

Venus Bum

Mercury Bum

Bum Earth

365.256 days period Page 15

27.321 days period

How Joe Nahhas can explain the periods of the three bum planets?

Venus 224.68 days Sun Moon 27.321 days

Mercury 87.960 days

Earth

365.256 days period

27.321 days period

From (2) T x -T0 = - 2 T0 sine 2 ω t --------------------------------------- (3) From (1) T x -T0 = - 2 T0 sine 2 (ω t/2) ---------------------------------- (4) The artifact ratio 0.607500428 From (2) 0.607500428 = T x -T0/ T0 = - 2 sine 2 ω t And the value ω t = 33.44494011 degrees; tan ω t = tan 33.44494011 = 0.660504466 The period of planet Mercury is the Sun's period of 365.256 days divided by 2 π tan ω t times the square of air index of refraction because Kepler's formula is use to determine the planetary periods and it is calculated are square The artifacts period of planet Mercury around the Sun: Is: (365.256 na2 /2 π tan ω t) = (365.256 x 1.0002932 /2 π 0.660504466) = 87.96041554 days Page 16

Planet Mercury is a bum: Artifacts circularization period of planet Mercury = 87.96 days Planet Venus is a bum: Artifacts circularization period of planet Mercury = 224.86 days When the Sun moves Planet Mercury and Venus appear like they are moving in motion (Planet Mercury) and in retrograde motion (Venus) when Mercury and Venus are bums.

Mercury Sun

Sun

Venus Earth

Planet Venus artifact period calculations: A - 365.256/2 π tan ω t = 88.0119679 days B - The artifacts is 0.607500428; retrograde artifacts is (1 - 0.607500428) = 0.392499572 And (88.0119679/0.392499572) = 224.2345574 days C - Time scale (Solar time/ Sidereal time) = (86400/96164.09943) = 1.002737806 D - Artifact of index of refraction: 1 + (1 - n a) sine ω t = 1.000161 Venus artifacts period: (224.2345574) (1.000161/1.002737806) = 224.6804828 days Page 17

Ole Roemer's hypothesis

From (2) T x -T0 = - 2 T0 sine 2 ω t --------------------------------------- (3) From (1) T x -T0 = - 2 T0 sine 2 (ω t/2) ---------------------------------- (4) A - Artifact 1 calculations: I - (365.256/27.321) =13.39605677 II- 13.36905677 - 13 (complete cycles) = 0.36905677 III - Circular artifacts is the square root of 0.36905677 = 0.607500428 B - Artifact 2 calculations: (after six month/ Earth other side of the Sun) I - [(365.256/27.321)/2] =13.39605677/2 = 6.684528385 II- 6.684528385- 6 (complete cycles) = 0.684528385 III - Circular artifacts is the square root of 0.684528385 = 0.827362306 Orbital: From (2) T x -T0 = - 2 T0 sine 2 ω t ------------------------------------ (3) A - Artifact 1; ω t = 33.44494011 degrees B - Artifact 2; ω t = 40.02939213 degrees Line: From (1) T x -T0 = - 2 T0 sine 2 (ω t/2) ---------------------------------- (4)

Δ T = T x -T0 = - 2 T0 sine 2 (ω t/2); T0 = 1.769137788 days
Page 18

Δ T = - 2 T0 sine 2 (ω t/2)
And ω t/2 = [(40.02939213 degrees) - (33.44494011 degrees)]/2 = 3.29222601 degrees

Δ T = - 2 T0 sine 2 (ω t/2)
= - 2 T0 sine 2 (ω t/2) = (- 2 x 1.769137788 days) sine 2 (3.29222601 /2)

Δ T = 0.011669377 days
C - Δ T = 0.011669377 days

Δ T = 0.011669377 x (86400 second) = 1008. 234135 seconds
Compensating or dividing for the twice the time error squared using Kepler's law; Kepler's law is given or calculated as T2 or [(86400/86164.09943)2]2 Compensating or multiplying for the twice the air index of refraction error for two measurements (1.000293)2 Compensating or multiplying once for the air index artifact of refraction error squared for two measurements (1.000161)

Δ T (measured artifact time)
= [(1008. 234135 seconds) (1.000293)2(1.000161)]/ [(86400/86164.09943)2]2

Δ T (measured artifact time) = 998.0130372 seconds
Twice Earth - Sun distance = 2 x 1.49598 x 1011 Light artifact velocity C = 299792458 C Δ T = [299792458 x 998.0130372]/2 = 1.4959839 x 1011 C Δ T = artifact velocity x artifact time = 1.4959839 x 1011 The artifact ratio 0.607500428 comes from? Earth moves in 27.321 days cycle and the Sun moves 365.256 days cycle! Page 19

3 - Newton's equation solution as an expression of an artifact of 0.607500438 F = -G m M/r2; r > 0
Physics Faculty wrong solution of ellipse, r (θ, 0) = a (1 - ε2)/ (1 + ε cosine θ) Correct solution is a rotating ellipse, r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ ε cosine θ)] ℮ (λ + ì ω) t Newton's equation in polar coordinates F = m γ;

γ= [r" - r θ'²] r1 + [2 r' θ' + r θ"] θ1
Eq-1 Eq-2

With m (r" - r θ'²) = - Gm M/r2 And 2 r' θ' + r θ"= 0

I - Real numbers or time independent solution Eq-2: 2 r' θ' + r θ"= 0 Multiply by r> 0 Then 2 r r' θ' + r2 θ"= 0 Or, d (r²θ')/d t = 0 And integrating: r²θ' = h = constant With m (r" - r θ'²) = - Gm M/r2 Then, (r" - r θ'²) = - GM/r2 Let u = 1/r; r = 1/u; r²θ' = h = θ’ /u² And r' = d r/d t = (d r/ d u) (d u /d θ) (d θ/ d t) = (- /u ²) (d u /d θ) θ' = (-θ'/u ²) (d u /d θ) = - h (d u/ d θ) And r' = d r/d t = - h (d u/ d θ) And r" = d² r/ d t² = d (d r'/ d t)/ d t = d [- h (d u/ d θ)]/ d t Multiply (d θ/ d θ) Then r" = d² r/ d t² = {d [- h (d u/ d θ)]/ d t} (d θ/ d θ) = θ' {d [- h (d u/ d θ)]/ d θ} Page 20

= - h θ’ (d² u/ d θ ²) = (- h²/r²) (d² u/ d θ ²) = - h² u² (d² u/ d θ ²) And r" = d² r/ d t² = - h² u² (d² u/ d θ ²) With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = - G M/r2 Eq–1

And - h² u² (d² u/ d θ ²) – (1/u) (h u²) ² = - G M u2 Then (d² u/ d θ ²) + u = G M/h2 And u = G M/h2 + A cosine θ The r = 1/u = 1/ (G M/h2 + A cosine θ); divide by G M/h2 And r = (h2/G M)/ [1 + (A h2/G M) cosine θ] With; h2/G M = a (1 - ε2); (A h2/G M) = ε This is Newton's equation classical solution Or, r = a (1 - ε2)/ (1 + ε cosine θ); definition of an ellipse ------------- I Newton's time independent solution II - Real time or complex numbers solution : Newton's equation in polar coordinates F = m γ;

γ= [r" - r θ'²] r1 + [2 r' θ' + r θ"] θ1
Eq-1 Eq-2

With m (r" - r θ'²) = - Gm M/r2 And 2 r' θ' + r θ"= 0 Eq-2: 2 r' θ' + r θ"= 0 Separate the variables: 2 r' θ' = - r θ" Or 2(r'/r) = - (θ"/θ') = - 2 (λ + í ω) Then: (r'/r) = λ + í ω Or d r/r = (λ + í ω) d t Then r = r 0 ℮ (λ + ì ω) t

Page 21

And r = r (θ, 0) r (0, t); r 0 = r (θ, 0) And r = r (θ, 0) ℮ (λ + ì ω) t And r (0, t) = ℮ (λ + ì ω) t With r (θ, 0) = a (1 - ε2)/ (1 + ε cosine θ) Then, r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ε cosine θ)] ℮ (λ + ì ω) t ------------- I Newton's time dependent solution = quantum mechanics If time is frozen that is t = 0 Then r (θ, 0) = a (1-ε²)/ (1+ε cosine θ) or classical Relativistic is the difference between I and Real II With - (θ"/θ') = - 2 (λ + í ω) Then θ' = θ'0 ℮ -2 (λ + ì ω) t With θ'0 = h/ [r (θ, 0)] 2 And θ'(θ, t) = [θ' (θ, 0)] ℮ -2 (λ + ì ω) t And, θ'(θ, t) = θ' (θ, 0) θ' (0, t) And θ' (0, t) = θ' (0, 0) ℮ -2 (λ + ì ω) t At Perihelion: We Have θ' (0, 0) = h (0, 0)/r² (0, 0) = 2πab/ τ0 a² (1- ε) ²; = 2πa² [√ (1- ε²)]/ = 2π [√ (1- ε²)]/ Then θ'(0, t) = 2 With λ= 0 Then θ'(0, t) = 2

τ0 = orbital period

τ0a² (1- ε) ²]

τ0 (1- ε) ²]

π √ [(1- ε²)/ τ0 (1- ε) ²] ℮ -2 (λ + ì ω) t

π √ [(1-ε²)/ τ0 (1-ε) ²] ℮ -2 (λ + ì ω) t

= 2 π √ [(1-ε²)/ τ0 (1- ε) ²] (cosine 2 ω t - ỉ sine 2 ω t) Page 22

Real θ'(0, t) = 2 Real θ'(0, t) = 2

π √ [(1- ε²)/ τ0 (1-ε) ²] cosine 2 ω t π √ [(1-ε²)/ τ0 (1-ε) ²] (1 - 2sine² ω t) π √ [(1-ε²)/ τ0 (1-ε) ²]

Naming θ' = θ'(0, t); θ'0 = 2 Then θ' = 2

π √ [(1- ε²)/ τ0 (1- ε) ²] (1 - 2 sine² ω t)

And θ' = θ'0 (1 - 2 sine² ω t) And θ' - θ'0 = - 2 θ'0 sine² ω t = -2{2 And θ' - θ'0 = -4

π √ [(1-ε²)/ τ0 (1-ε) ²]} sine² ω t

π √ [(1-ε²)/ τ0 (1-ε) ²] sine² ω t

With, v ° = spin velocity; v0 = orbital velocity; τ0 = orbital period And ω τ0= tan-1 [(v° + v0)/c]; light aberrations Δ θ' = θ' - θ'0 = - 4 π √ [(1-ε²)]/

τ0 (1-ε) ²] sine² tan-1 [(v° + v0)/c] radians per τ0 π

In degrees per period is multiplication by 180/ Δ θ' = (-720) √ [(1-ε²)/

τ0 (1-ε) ²] sine² tan-1 [(v° + v0)/c]

The angle difference in degrees per period is: Δ θ = (Δ θ') τ0 Δ θ = (-720) √ [(1-ε²)/ (1-ε) ²] sine² tan-1 [(v° + v0)/c] calculated in degrees per century is multiplication = 100 τ;

τ = Earth orbital period = 100 x 365.26 = 36526 days and dividing by using τ0 in days: Δ θ (100 τ / τ0) = Δ θ in degrees per century
= (-72000 τ /

τ0) √ [(1-ε²)/ (1-ε) ²] sine² tan-1 [(v° + v0)/c]

In arc second per century is multiplying by 3600 Δ θ = - 3600 x 720 (100 Approximations I With v° << c and v* << c Then Sine² tan-1 [(v°+ v0)/c] ≈ (v° + v0)/c Δ θ (Calculated in arc second per century) = (-720x36526x3600/

τ / τ0) √ [(1-ε²)/ (1-ε) ²] x Sine² tan-1 [(v° + v0)/c]

τ0 days) √ [(1-ε²)/ (1-ε) ²] [(v° + v0)/c] ²
Page 23

Approximations II The circumference of an ellipse Is: 2

π a (1 - ε²/4 + 3/16(ε²)²- --.) ≈ 2 π a (1- ε²/4); r0 = a (1- ε²/4)

From Newton's laws for a circular orbit: F = [M/m F = - Gm M/r02 = m v0²/ r0 Then v0² = GM/ r0; for planet Mercury And v0 = √ [GM/ r] = √ [GM/a (1-ε²/4)] G = 6.673 x 10 -11; M = 2 x1030 kg; a = 58.2 x 109 meters; ε = 0.206 Then v0 = √ [6.673 x 10 -11 x 2 x1030 /58.2 x 109 (1- 0.206 ²/4)] And v0 = 48.14 km/sec [Mercury]; c = 300,000 Δ θ (Calculated in arc second per century) = (-720x36526x3600/

τ0 days) √ [(1-ε²)/ (1-ε) ²] [(v° + v0)/c] ²

With ε = 0.206; √ [(1-ε²)/ (1-ε) ²] = 1.552; v° = 3 meters per second Δ θ = (-720x36526x3600/88) 1.552 (48.143/300,000) ² Δ θ = 43 arc second per century Summary = (-720x36526x3600/

τ0 days) √ [(1-ε²)/ (1-ε) ²] [(v° + v0)/c] ²

= (-720x36526x3600/88) 1.552 (48.143/300,000) ² = 43 arc second per century

Page 24

Or, r = a (1 - ε2)/ (1 + ε cosine θ); definition of an ellipse Rotating ellipse, r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ε cosine θ)] ℮ (λ + ì ω) t ------------- I
Sun - Mercury Period in seconds = 87.96 days x 24 hours x 60 minutes x 60 seconds Planet Mercury angular velocity around the Sun Is θ0'= 2 x π/88 x 24 x 60 x 60 radians per period Planet Mercury angular velocity around the Sun in arc second per century δθ0' = (2 x π /87.96 x 24 x 60 x 60) (180/ = 70.81384506 arc sec per century. If C = δθ0' = 70.81384506 arc sec per century measured from the Sun

π) (36525.6/87.96) (3600)

And 70.81384506 x 0.607500428 = 43 arc sec per century Modern + Nobel physics is based on time travel and time travel is wrong use of clock! I am not only saying Nobel is wrong but what I can prove is modern + Nobel = wrong All Rights reserved

Page 25

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful