Algebraic Topology Solutions 3

Ian Vincent
February 14, 2013
Exercise 1
Compute the simplicial homology groups of the two-sphere, directly from the deﬁnitions, using
the ∆-complex structure coming from the boundary of a tetrahedron. Provide clearly labelled
ﬁgures.
In the above diagram, I have labelled the tetrahedron’s vertices by w
0
, w
1
, w
2
, w
3
, the edges
as:
a = |w
0
, w
1
|, b = |w
1
, w
2
|, c = |w
0
, w
2
|, d = |w
0
, w
3
|, e = |w
1
, w
3
|, f = |w
2
, w
3
|
and the faces of the tetrahedron as:
P = |w
0
, w
1
, w
2
|, Q = |w
0
, w
1
, w
3
|, R = |w
1
, w
2
, w
3
|, S = |w
0
, w
2
, w
3
|
This means that ∆
2
= ⟨P, Q, R, S⟩ ≅ Z
4
, ∆
1
= ⟨a, b, c, d, e, f⟩ ≅ Z
6
, ∆
0
= ⟨w
0
, w
1
, w
2
, w
3
⟩ ≅ Z
4
,
giving us the chain complex
0

3
→Z
4

2
→Z
6

1
→Z
4

0
→0
Being a homomorphism from 0, we have im∂
3
= ¦0¦ and so H

2
(S
2
) =
ker ∂
2
im∂
3
≅ ker ∂
2
.
For ease of computation, we write the boundary maps ∂
2
and ∂
1
as matrices:

2

P Q R S
a
b
c
d
e
f

1 1 0 0
1 0 1 0
−1 0 0 1
0 −1 0 −1
0 1 −1 0
0 0 1 1

1

a b c d e f
w
0
w
1
w
2
w
3

−1 0 −1 −1 0 0
1 −1 0 0 −1 0
0 1 1 0 0 −1
0 0 0 1 1 1

Now, to compute the kernels and images of the boundary maps, it is much easier to convert to
Smith Normal Form (remembering to work over Z, not R). Either doing it by hand, or putting
1
these matrices into your favourite computer algebra package, you will get:

2

1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0

1

1 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0

Therefore rank(∂
2
) = 3 so ker(∂
2
) ≅ Z. Similarly, rank(∂
1
) = 3 so ker(∂
1
) ≅ Z
3
. As ∂
0
is the zero
map, we have ker(∂
0
) = Z
4
. As the diagonal entries of the Smith Normal Form of ∂
1
are all 1,
we conclude that:
H

0
(S
2
) =
Z
Z

Z
Z

Z
Z
⊕Z
4−3
≅ Z
Similarly, the diagonal entries of the Smith Normal Form of ∂
2
are all 1, we conclude that
H

1
(S
2
) =
Z
Z

Z
Z

Z
Z
⊕Z
3−3
≅ ¦0¦
As H

2
(S
2
) = ker(∂
2
), we just have that
H

2
(S
2
) = Z
For the rest, when n ≥ 3 we have ∆
n
= 0, so ker ∂
n
= im∂
n+1
= ¦0¦ and so H

n
(S
2
) ≅ ¦0¦ for
n ≥ 3. and we are done.
Remark 1. It is not suﬃcient to simply say “Oh look!, ker ∂
1
= ⟨∂
2
P, ∂
2
Q, ∂
2
R⟩ ≅ Z
3
, and
im∂
2
= ⟨∂
2
P, ∂
2
Q, ∂
2
R⟩ ≅ Z
3
, so H

1
≅ Z
3−3
= ¦0¦.”
While it works in this case, this is not necessarily true all the time. A simple counterexample
is the following: Let H = ⟨a⟩ and G = ⟨2a⟩. Certainly, H ≅ G ≅ Z but
H
G

Z
2Z
, not ¦0¦. The
important distinction is that the diagonal entries in the matrices give the “Torsion Coeﬃcients”
of the homology group. It just so happens that in this example all those torsion coeﬃcients
were 1.
Remark 2. It is entirely possible to do this question without Smith Normal Form, and simply
comparing generating sets for all the kernels and images directly. However, this needs to be
done with great care to avoid issues like those present in the ﬁrst remark. The whole reason
why Smith Normal Form works is because it does all the work in comparing generators for you
by changing to a nicer basis.
Not only that, but it is deﬁnately a lot quicker and easier to do Smith Normal form than to
compute kernels and images directly!
2
Exercise 2
Suppose that X is a non-empty, path-connected space, equipped with a ∆-complex structure.
Show, directly from the deﬁnitions that H

0
(X) ≅ Z. (You may assume without proof that the
one-skeleton is connected.
Recall that H

0
(X) ∶=
ker ∂
0
im∂
1
. Remembering what a quotient group actually is, this means two
elements of H

0
(X) are equal if and only if the diﬀerence between (their representatives) is a
boundary.
Also note that ∂
0
is the zero map, so ker ∂
0
= ∆
0
, which is by deﬁnition the free abelian group
generated by the vertices ¦v
i
¦ of X. Pick any two vertices v
i
, v
j
. As the 1-skeleton X
1
of X is
connected, we can choose a ﬁnite sum of edges γ = ∑
k
e
k
that geometrically form a continuous
path connecting the vertices v
i
and v
j
. But then ∂
1
(γ) = v
j
− v
i
so the homology classes
represented by v
i
and v
j
are equal, meaning H

0
(X) = ⟨v⟩ ≅ Z for any vertex v.
Exercise 3
Suppose X is a ﬁnite, path-connected, one-dimensional ∆-complex: that is, a ﬁnite connected
graph. Suppose that X has E edges and V vertices. Compute the simplicial homology groups
of X.
X gives rise to the following chain complex
0

2
→Z
E

1
→Z
V

0
→0
If X = ∅, then immediately from the deﬁnitions we have that H

n
(X) = 0 for all X. For the
rest of the assignment, assume X ≠ ∅. I think it is easier to think of ∂
1
as represented by some
matrix with V rows and E columns, so from now on I think of ∂
1
as a linear map over Z.
We know that as X is path-connected, by assignment 3.2 we know that H

0
(X) = Z. As
H

0
(X) =
Z
V
im∂
1
= Z, this implies that the rank of ∂
1
is V −1. Therefore by the ﬁrst isomorphism
theorem, the dimension of the kernel of ∂
1
is E − (V − 1) = E − V + 1 and so ker ∂
1
≅ Z
E−V +1
.
But now as ∂
2
is the zero map, we have H

1
(X) =
ker ∂
1
im∂
2
= ker ∂
1
≅ Z
E−V +1
.
As there are no simplices in dimensions 2 or higher, all other boundary maps are zero and hence
H

n
(X) ≅ ¦0¦ for all n ≥ 2.
Exercise 4
Compute the reduced singular homology groups of a point, directly from the deﬁnitions.
By deﬁnition [Hatcher, page 110], the reduced homology groups
˜
H
n
(X) of X are the homology
groups of the following chain complex:

3
→C
2
(X)

2
→C
1
(X)

1
→C
0
(X)

→Z →0
where is the map deﬁned by (∑
i
n
i
σ
i
) = ∑
i
n
i
for n
i
∈ Z and singular 0-simplices σ
i
.
Note, for each n, there is a unique map which we call σ
n
∶ ∆
n
→X = ¦pt¦. Therefore C
n
(X) is
3
the free abelian group generated by one element σ
n
, hence isomorphic to Z.
Now, by deﬁnition, ∂
n

n
) = ∑
n
i=0
(−1)
i
σ
n
||v
0
, ..., ̂ v
i
, ..., v
n
| but σ
n
restricted to any (n − 1)-face
of ∆
n
is simply σ
n−1
. Therefore

n

n
) = _
n

i=0
(−1)
i

n−1
=

σ
n−1
if n is even and nonzero
0 if n is odd
In particular, if n is even and non-zero then ∂
n
is an isomorphism (it sends the generator to a
generator). Now, we know ∶ Z → Z just maps nσ
0
→ n which is also an isomorphism. Hence
we get the singular chain complex
⋯Z

→Z
0
→Z

→Z
0
→Z

→Z →0
We have an alternating sequence of 0 maps and isomorphisms, so it is now very easy to compute
the singular homology:
If n is odd then
˜
H
n
(X) =
ker ∂
n
im∂
n+1

Z
Z
≅ ¦0¦. If n is even then
˜
H
n
(X) =
0
0
≅ ¦0¦ so the reduced
homology of a point is trivial in all dimensions.
Exercise 5
Compute the singular homology groups of the circle S
1
, directly from the deﬁnitions.
Reaction
The exercise is labelled “Challenge”. Therefore, in order for it to remain a Challenge you should
try it yourself!
Exercise 6
Compute the singular homology groups of the plane R
2
, minus n points.
Reference any theorems from Hatcher that you use.
Let X be R
2
∖¦x
1
, ..., x
n
¦. We may assume that the n points x
1
, ..., x
n
are equally spaced along
the x-axis. The idea is to “homotope” the whole of X down to a wedge sum of n circles, each
one S
1
i
centered about the removed point x
i
. Such a map is in general hard to write down, but
geometrically the situation is as follows:
The idea is to gradually contract X in the direction of the arrows through the grey shape,
and down to the above circles in a continuous way.
4
Note that X is path connected and non-empty, so by Proposition 2.7 of Hatcher on page 109,
we have H
0
(X) ≅ Z. For the others, we now apply Corollary 2.11 from page 111 in Hatcher:
Corollary. The maps f

∶ H
n
(X) →H
n
(Y ) induced by a homotopy equivalence f ∶ X →Y are
isomorphisms for all n.
Therefore we now need to compute H
n
{

n
i=1
S
1
). Flicking through Hatcher to Corollary
2.25 on page 126:
Corollary. For a wedge sum ⋁
α
X
α
, the inclusions i
α
∶ X
α
↪⋁
α
X
α
induce an isomorphism

α
(i
α
)

∶ ⊕
α
˜
H
n
(X
α
) →
˜
H
n
_⋁
α
X
α
_
provided that the wedge sum is formed at basepoints x
α
∈ X
α
such that the pairs (X
α
, x
α
) are
good.
Note that the above shape is homotopy equivalent to a wedge sum of circles (we need that
the circles are all attached at one point rather than in a series). Note that in our case, about
any point y ∈ S
1
there exists a neighbourhood U of which y is a deformation retract of U (that
is, U is contractible) so we are allowed to apply the corollary.
Recall that the reduced singular homology of S
1
is
˜
H
k
(S
1
) =

Z if k = 1
0 otherwise
Therefore the two corollaries do all the work for us and so we get
H
k
(X) =

Z if k = 0
Z
n
if k = 1
0 otherwise
Exercise 7
Suppose f
#
∶ C

→ D

is a chain map of chain complexes; that is f∂ = ∂f. Show that this
induces a well deﬁned homomorphism f

∶ H
n
(C) →H
n
(D) on homology.
Reaction
The induced map is deﬁned by the formula f

|c| = |f
#
(c)| where the square brackets denote
“the homology class of”. From here on, just treat H
n
(X) as you would any other quotient of
abelian groups. See Algebra II for example.
Exercise 8
1. Suppose that X is a ∆-complex. Let i ∶ ∆

(X) →C

(X) be the inclusion homomorphism.
Show that i is a chain map.
2. Suppose that f ∶ X → Y is a map of topological spaces. Show that the induced function
f
#
∶ C

(X) →C

(Y ) is a homomorphism, and a chain map.
5
1. This follows immediately from the fact that i is a homomorphism:
∂(i(σ)) =
i
(−1)
i
i(σ)|v
0
, ..., ̂ v
i
, ..., v
n
|
= i _
i
(−1)
i
σ|v
0
, ..., ̂ v
i
, ..., v
n
|_ = i(∂(σ))
2. Go read Hatcher, pages 110-111.
Exercise 9
Show that chain homotopy of chain maps is an equivalence relation.
We say two chain maps f, g are chain homotopic, and write f ∼ g if there exists a homomorphism
P (called the Prism Operator) so that ∂P + P∂ = f − g.
Now, note that if P and Q are homomorphisms, then so are −P and P + Q. Now note that
for any f, f − f = 0 = ∂0 + 0∂ so ∼ is reﬂexive. If f ∼ g then there exists P so ∂P + P∂ =
f − g hence g − f = −(f − g) = ∂(−P) + (−P)∂ which means g ∼ f so ∼ is symmetric. If f ∼ g
and g ∼ h then there exists P and Q so f − g = ∂P + P∂ and g − h = ∂Q + Q∂. Therefore
f − h = (f − g) + (g − h) = ∂(P + Q) + (P + Q)∂ so f ∼ h and ∼ is transitive.
Exercise 10
We say two chain complexes C

and D

are chain homotopy equivalent if there are chain maps
f ∶ C

→ D

and g ∶ D

→ C

so that g ○ f ∼ Id
C
and f ○ g ∼ Id
D
. Let C

be the chain complex
with C
1
= C
0
= Z and all other chain groups trivial, and with ∂(m) = 2m. Let D

be the chain
complex with D
1
= D
0
= Z
2
, and all other chain groups trivial, and with ∂

(x, y) = (x−y, x+y).
Prove that C

and D

are homotopy equivalent.
We need to ﬁnd maps f
1
, g
1
, f
0
and g
0
that ﬁt into the following diagram, and linear maps
P
1
, ..., P
4
so that:
0P
1
+ P
2
∂ = g
1
f
1
− 1
∂P
2
+ 0 = g
0
f
0
− 1
0P
3
+ P
4

= f
1
g
1
− 1

P
4
+ 0 = f
0
g
0
− 1
0
//
0
//
C
1
= Z

//
f
1

C
0
= Z
//
f
0

0
0
//
0
//
D
1
= Z
2

//
g
1
OO
D
0
= Z
2
//
g
0
OO
0
Note that we may as well let P
1
and P
3
be zero since the boundary operators C
2
→ C
1
and
D
2
→D
1
are zero.
Deﬁne f
1
(m) = (m, m) and f
0
(m) = (0, m). Then f is a chain map as ∂

f
1
(m) = (0, 2m) =
6
f
0
∂(m). Deﬁne g
1
(x, y) = x and g
0
(x, y) = x + y. Then g is a chain map as ∂g
1
(x, y) = 2x =
g
0

(x, y).
Thus g
1
○ f
1
(m) = g
1
(m, m) = m and g
0
○ f
0
(m) = g
0
(0, m) = m so we can use P
2
= 0.
On the other hand, f
1
○ g
1
(x, y) = f
1
(x) = (x, x) and f
0
○ g
0
(x, y) = f
0
(x + y) = (0, x + y) is
very much not the identity!
We use the prism operator P
4
(x, y) = (0, x) and check it works:
f
1
g
1
(x, y) − Id(x, y) = (x, x) − (x, y) = (0, x − y) = P
4
(x − y, x + y) = P
4

(x, y) and:
f
0
g
0
(x, y) − Id(x, y) = (0, x + y) − (x, y) = (−x, x) = ∂(0, x) = ∂

P
4
(x, y) as required.
7