This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
Georgia is the home of the Ft. Benning Army Base, which represents the freedom of the American people. The very freedom that Georgia's public officials are destroying. It doesn't matter, who you are, in the eyes of these corrupt public officials, if your not part of their elite circle , you have NO RIGHTS.
The Thomases' provide the JQC commission, with exhibits that can be viewed at Corrupt Judges Columbus Georgia on this site. These letter shows how public officials disregard the law to protect one of their own and falsify public records by providing this false information. Here the Commission failed to address or provided false information of the following: 1. The conspiracy between Judge Jordan and KIA Auto Sport(KAS) to have the case placed before Judge Jordan. 2. Judge Jordan ex parte communications to change an order from allowing discovery to staying ALL discovery. 3. Failure to timely address motions, to put the Thomases' at a disadvantage in the case. 4.Judge Jordan failure to be faithful to the law, which includes the method of assignment, which shows that Judge Smith was the assigned judge to this case, presiding over a case that he was not assigned to, and willfully disregarding the laws as it pertains to identity theft.
__________________________ ____________________________________________ see O.C.G.A. § _______________________ 15-6-21
The following documents will show, how the JQC is bias in carrying out their Constitutional duty when some judges are investigated for misconduct such as assigning cases to themselves, having ex parte communications with one party to enter orders, and others judges like Judge Jordan, where the court records shows that he criminally conspired to have case 11-CV-154 assigned to him, and engaged in ex parte communications to change an oral order and disregarded the law as it deals with the Uniform Superior Court Rules, the local method of assignment, case laws, the Canons, and the Georgia statutes.
CHEIF JUDGE LEE
JUDGE PULLEN, also note that Judge Pullen was also over the Expedia case during this time period, and Expedia file a Mandamus against him to compel him to enter an Order. Shortly, after this the news media start reporting about a child molester that was sentence by Judge Pullen but remain free until 2011. Pullen passed the case off to his colleague in part because Moseley’s case has not appeared on Allen’s docket. “I just think it’s prudent for any number of reasons since it involves all of us,”
Pullen, referring to Judge Bobby Peters and Judge Frank Jordan Jr., both of whom briefly presided over Moseley’s proceedings. See http:// www.ledger-enquirer.com/2011/08/14/1693218/ how-a-child-molester-with-a15.html#storylink=cpy.
The JQC also investigated records outlining the contributions of remaining class actions funds from Pope McGlamry and Butler Wooten shows Pullen presided over most of the diminished value cases, Judge Frank Jordan Jr. handled two with Pope McGlamry that created about $3.75 million in remainder funds. Chief Judge John D. Allen had two cases that totaled about $1.2 million in leftover money working together with the attorneys in handling the contributions. Gardner, the director of litigation for the Center for Science in the Public Interest, stated it is improper for remainder funds to be distributed to a defendant’s own charity, or “pet projects” of plaintiffs’ attorneys or judges. See: http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/2011/08/21/1701279/pullens-gifts-records-reveal-judge.html#storylink=cpy
This document shows the heart of Judge Jordan's criminal conspiracy to placed case 11-CV-154 on his docket.
*This court document reveals Judge Jordan's criminal conspiracy to fix case 11-CV-154 by placing it on his docket on March 7,2012, which shows he conspired with KIA Auto Sport before March 7,2012, informed KIA Auto Sport to file a notice requesting a hearing before him;
Canon 3 Judges Shall Perform the Duties of Judicial Office Impartially and Diligently B. Adjudicative Responsibilities. (1) Judges shall hear and decide matters assigned to them, except those in which they are disqualified.
anticipating a big personal gain, Judge Jordan mistakenly had the case place on his docket, 9 days before KIA Auto Sport requested it, as showed by this official printed date
This document expose the criminal conspiracy, between Judge Jordan and KIA Auto Sport.
*This document shows KIA Auto Sport fulfilling their part in the criminal conspiracy to have the case placed before Judge Jordan.
Canon 3 Judges Shall Perform the Duties of Judicial Office Impartially and Diligently B. Adjudicative Responsibilities. (2) Judges should be faithful to the law* and maintain professional competence in it. Judges shall not be swayed by partisan interests, public clamor, or fear of criticism.
*The only problem is it was written seven (7) days late and the notice of hearing was filed nine (9) days late on 03/16/2012.
This document also suggest that these criminal conspiracy is a routine policy for some judges in the CJC, where the clerk knows not to assign a judge to the case. This allows judges and certain litigants engaged in " judge shopping". As you see by the JQC's Director letter he failed to address these issues, that violate the law.
Canon TERMINOLOGY Terms explained below are noted with an asterisk (*) in the Sections where they appear. In addition, the Sections where terms appear are referred to after the explanation of each term below.............."Law" denotes court rules as well as statutes, constitutional provisions and decisional law. See Sections 2A, 3A, 3B(2), 3B(7), 4A, 4B, 4C, 5C(4), and 5G. Canon 3 Judges Shall Perform the Duties of Judicial Office Impartially and Diligently A. Judicial Duties in General. The judicial duties of judges take precedence over all their other activities. Their judicial duties include all the duties offices prescribed by law*. In the performance of these duties, the following standards apply:
Judge Jordan failed to address the 2nd discovery request and failed to notify the Thomases' of the ex parte communications between himself and KAS to change the discovery order of allowing discovery to an order staying ALL discovery. ________________________________ Failed to address the Thomases' motion for Clarification of the 04/04/2012 Order staying ALL discovery.
________________________________ Failed to address the Thomases' Motion for Default Judgement. ______________________ Failed to address the Thomases' Motion for Sanctions. These motions was before the court, before Judge Jordan entered his signed his order on 06/11/2012, and filed on 06/12/2012. __________
Judge Jordan failed to address these motions in a timely manner to place the Thomases' at a disadvantage in violation of O.C.G.A. § 15-6-21 (2012)(a) In a county with less than 100,000 inhabitants, it shall be the duty of the judge of the superior, state, or city court, unless providentially hindered or unless counsel for the plaintiff and the defendant agree in writing to extend the time, to decide promptly, within 30 days after the same have been argued before him or submitted to him without argument, all motions for new trials, injunctions, demurrers, and all other motions of any nature. (d) If any judge fails or refuses, unless providentially hindered or unless counsel for the plaintiff and the defendant agree in writing to extend the time, to obey the provisions of subsections (a) through (c) of this Code section, or if any judge repeatedly or persistently fails or refuses to decide the various motions, demurrers, and injunctions coming before him in the manner provided by such subsections, such conduct shall be grounds for impeachment and the penalty therefor shall be his removal from office.
_________________ *Once again, how could there be a motion hearing, when there was no motion filed by the Defendant, before or on 03/07/2012, which placed it on Judge Jordan's calendar?
Whether the order correctly mirrors. If the Order doesn't mirror the Oral Order, that means the Order has been changed through ex parte communications with the opposing attorney, that created the Order
Canon 2 Judges Shall Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety in All Their Activities. A. Judges shall respect and comply with the law* and shall act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.
Uniform Superior Court Rules for the Georgia Rule 4.1. Prohibition on Ex Parte Communications Except as authorized by law or by rule, judges shall neither initiate nor consider ex parte communications by interested parties or their attorneys concerning a pending or impending proceeding.
Ms. Lange stated that she mailed an order on March 26,2012 this was 3 days after the March 23,2012 hearing, in which Judge Jordan allowed discovery that was already submitted or will be submitted.
There is a BIG difference in allowing discovery to STAYING ALL PENDING DISCOVERY!!! This letter also contradicts, Ms. Lange's letter. This Order shows that there was ex parte communications with Judge Jordan prior to, during, and after the creation of this Order to further the criminal conspiracy to fix case 11-CV-154. The facts on the face of these document are visible and shows beyond a reasonable doubt , that Judge Jordan conspired in criminal acts and by the JQC ignoring these facts, brings into question, the integrity of the commission.
Canon 3 (7) Judges shall accord to every person who has a legal interest in a proceeding, or that person's lawyer, the right to be heard according to law*. Judges shall not initiate or consider ex parte communications, or consider other communications made to them outside the presence of the parties concerning a pending or impending proceeding, except that: (a) Where circumstances require, ex parte communications for scheduling, administrative purposes or emergencies that do not deal with substantive matters or issues on the merits are authorized; provided: (i) the judge reasonably believes that no party will gain a procedural or tactical advantage as a result of the ex parte communication, and (ii) the judge makes provision promptly to notify all other parties of the substance of the ex parte communication and allows an opportunity to respond.
These facts shows that Jeff Davis is a corrupt public official of the JQC and needs to be removed. He is denying citizens their state and federal Constitutional rights.
Judge Jordan's failure to follow the law. As shown by the following law statutes. Of course, if Judge Jordan did follow the law, then there would NO CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY to fix the case.
The following statutes are so self explanatory, as it deals with identity theft and it shows Judge Jordan's bias and his willful participation in a conspiracy. This also expose Jeff Davis bias against citizens in the state of Georgia and the United States, when it comes to protecting public corruption.
_______________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ *SunTrust Bank
___________________________________ ______________________ __________________________________________________________________________
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.