Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 19 13 0204 063341 2025 62821 Notice of Appeal Documents Re 3 8 13 Order Striking Coughlin's Motions 13-08188

    Uploaded by

    NevadaGadfly
    19 views10 pages
    Dear Ms. Purdy, Please see the attached Order of 8/19/13 granting an eflex waiver in cv11-08196. Please accord the rejected filing the filing date associated with its original submission date. CV11-01955 and CV11-01896 are easily confused, as they both have a caption that consists of "Zach Coughlin v. Washoe Legal Services"...but 01955 adds to other co-defendants (CAAW and TWS (now CIS)). Judge Stiglich's 8/19/13 Order After Hearing seems to contemplate that when a party is granted IFP status (as Coughlin was in 01896 back on 8/9/11...though the RMC refused to accord Coughlin court appointed counsel on 10/26/11 and 12/15/11, despite 01896 being a civil case and the case on appeal/petition in CR11-2064 being a criminal case that ultimately took away Coughlin's law license), they ought automatically be granted an eflex waiver, at least as to that case (though collateral estoppel seems to apply everywhere the state or county ever needs it to). The filing in 01896 is somewhat of a "time is of the essence" quality, though Mr. Garin has failed to respond to my entreaties to seek clarification from WLS's Exec. Director as to just what he meant incident to his expounding upon "black people's brains" back in early 2009. It would be nice to have an opportunity to question WCDA Bruce Hahn about his knowledge of that as well considering Hahn sat on the Northern Nevada Disciplinary Board (NNDB) Screening Panel in April 2012 that decided to put Coughlin and his family through this ridiculous, barbaric spectacle, largely based upon a 4/13/09 Order After Trial in DV08-01168 that was vacated by the 6/19/09 Final Decree of Divorce (so 2JDC Judge L. Gardner's vacated 4/13/09 Order After Trial was not only cited by Elcano as the sole reason for Coughlin's firing, but also formed one of the basis for the WCDA's Office's Hahn (whom clearly either knows not what a basis to disqualify himself from such an adjudicatory position would be (much like RJC Judge Hascheff, also a WLS Board of Directors member, whose finding that there was probable cause for the shameful 5/23/13 arrest of Coughlin (incident to RJC Bailiff John Reyes attacking Coughlin and throwing him over a bench) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMU_qWIwZbY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yllvEBtk6C4 Of course, RJC Judge David Clifton ruled during the 9/24/13 status conference in that RCR2013-072675 case that Coughlin would not be afforded court appointed counsel (despite Clifton indicating Coughlin could so avail himself of the Sixth Amendment at the 6/19/13 status conference), and that Coughlin had somehow waived his right to a speedy trial incident to Clifton taking Coughlin's Motion to Proceed IFP/Application for Court Appointed Counsel On The Condition That Coughlin Be Permitted to Appear as Co-Counsel and Retain All Final Decision Making Authority As to Means, Tactics, Objectives and Any Other Matter and running with it sufficient to stick Coughlin was R. Bruce Lindsay as his sole counsel (though such appointment was not even made until, at the very earliest, 6/6/13) and Lindsay allegedly waiving such rights on Coughlin's behalf (despite the fact that Lindsay had already threatened to murder Coughlin, which Coughlin reported to the RJC. Of course, Clifton abused his contempt power some more at the 5/30/13 hearing in 072675 when he made more of hsi threats to have Coughlin gagged with the duct tape the RJC Bailiffs were brandishing upon Coughlin pointing out the flaws in Clifton's scheme to stick Coughlin with Lindsay again (where Lindsay was so instrumental in the RJC's fraudulent "musicial case numbers" approach to denying Coughlin any redress or review of its fraudulent 12/20/12 Administrative Order 2012-01, which Judge Pearson rebranded as a criminal case on 3/6/13 (assigning case number RCR2012-071437, in a display of a former prosecutor turned judge losing his judicial immunity where reverting to the prosecutorial role he formerly occupied as part o

    Original Title

    3 19 13 0204 063341 2025 62821 Notice of Appeal Documents Re 3 8 13 Order Striking Coughlin's Motions 13-08188(1)

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Dear Ms. Purdy, Please see the attached Order of 8/19/13 granting an eflex waiver in cv11-08196. Please accord the rejected filing the filing date associated with its original submission date. CV11-01955 and CV11-01896 are easily confused, as they both have a caption that consists of "Zach Coughlin v. Washoe Legal Services"...but 01955 adds to other co-defendants (CAAW and TWS (now CIS)). Judge Stiglich's 8/19/13 Order After Hearing seems to contemplate that when a party is granted IFP status (as Coughlin was in 01896 back on 8/9/11...though the RMC refused to accord Coughlin court appointed counsel on 10/26/11 and 12/15/11, despite 01896 being a civil case and the case on appeal/petition in CR11-2064 being a criminal case that ultimately took away Coughlin's law license), they ought automatically be granted an eflex waiver, at least as to that case (though collateral estoppel seems to apply everywhere the state or county ever needs it to). The filing in 01896 is somewhat of a "time is of the essence" quality, though Mr. Garin has failed to respond to my entreaties to seek clarification from WLS's Exec. Director as to just what he meant incident to his expounding upon "black people's brains" back in early 2009. It would be nice to have an opportunity to question WCDA Bruce Hahn about his knowledge of that as well considering Hahn sat on the Northern Nevada Disciplinary Board (NNDB) Screening Panel in April 2012 that decided to put Coughlin and his family through this ridiculous, barbaric spectacle, largely based upon a 4/13/09 Order After Trial in DV08-01168 that was vacated by the 6/19/09 Final Decree of Divorce (so 2JDC Judge L. Gardner's vacated 4/13/09 Order After Trial was not only cited by Elcano as the sole reason for Coughlin's firing, but also formed one of the basis for the WCDA's Office's Hahn (whom clearly either knows not what a basis to disqualify himself from such an adjudicatory position would be (much like RJC Judge Hascheff, also a WLS Board of Directors member, whose finding that there was probable cause for the shameful 5/23/13 arrest of Coughlin (incident to RJC Bailiff John Reyes attacking Coughlin and throwing him over a bench) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMU_qWIwZbY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yllvEBtk6C4 Of course, RJC Judge David Clifton ruled during the 9/24/13 status conference in that RCR2013-072675 case that Coughlin would not be afforded court appointed counsel (despite Clifton indicating Coughlin could so avail himself of the Sixth Amendment at the 6/19/13 status conference), and that Coughlin had somehow waived his right to a speedy trial incident to Clifton taking Coughlin's Motion to Proceed IFP/Application for Court Appointed Counsel On The Condition That Coughlin Be Permitted to Appear as Co-Counsel and Retain All Final Decision Making Authority As to Means, Tactics, Objectives and Any Other Matter and running with it sufficient to stick Coughlin was R. Bruce Lindsay as his sole counsel (though such appointment was not even made until, at the very earliest, 6/6/13) and Lindsay allegedly waiving such rights on Coughlin's behalf (despite the fact that Lindsay had already threatened to murder Coughlin, which Coughlin reported to the RJC. Of course, Clifton abused his contempt power some more at the 5/30/13 hearing in 072675 when he made more of hsi threats to have Coughlin gagged with the duct tape the RJC Bailiffs were brandishing upon Coughlin pointing out the flaws in Clifton's scheme to stick Coughlin with Lindsay again (where Lindsay was so instrumental in the RJC's fraudulent "musicial case numbers" approach to denying Coughlin any redress or review of its fraudulent 12/20/12 Administrative Order 2012-01, which Judge Pearson rebranded as a criminal case on 3/6/13 (assigning case number RCR2012-071437, in a display of a former prosecutor turned judge losing his judicial immunity where reverting to the prosecutorial role he formerly occupied as part o

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    19 views10 pages

    3 19 13 0204 063341 2025 62821 Notice of Appeal Documents Re 3 8 13 Order Striking Coughlin's Motions 13-08188

    Uploaded by

    NevadaGadfly
    Dear Ms. Purdy, Please see the attached Order of 8/19/13 granting an eflex waiver in cv11-08196. Please accord the rejected filing the filing date associated with its original submission date. CV11-01955 and CV11-01896 are easily confused, as they both have a caption that consists of "Zach Coughlin v. Washoe Legal Services"...but 01955 adds to other co-defendants (CAAW and TWS (now CIS)). Judge Stiglich's 8/19/13 Order After Hearing seems to contemplate that when a party is granted IFP status (as Coughlin was in 01896 back on 8/9/11...though the RMC refused to accord Coughlin court appointed counsel on 10/26/11 and 12/15/11, despite 01896 being a civil case and the case on appeal/petition in CR11-2064 being a criminal case that ultimately took away Coughlin's law license), they ought automatically be granted an eflex waiver, at least as to that case (though collateral estoppel seems to apply everywhere the state or county ever needs it to). The filing in 01896 is somewhat of a "time is of the essence" quality, though Mr. Garin has failed to respond to my entreaties to seek clarification from WLS's Exec. Director as to just what he meant incident to his expounding upon "black people's brains" back in early 2009. It would be nice to have an opportunity to question WCDA Bruce Hahn about his knowledge of that as well considering Hahn sat on the Northern Nevada Disciplinary Board (NNDB) Screening Panel in April 2012 that decided to put Coughlin and his family through this ridiculous, barbaric spectacle, largely based upon a 4/13/09 Order After Trial in DV08-01168 that was vacated by the 6/19/09 Final Decree of Divorce (so 2JDC Judge L. Gardner's vacated 4/13/09 Order After Trial was not only cited by Elcano as the sole reason for Coughlin's firing, but also formed one of the basis for the WCDA's Office's Hahn (whom clearly either knows not what a basis to disqualify himself from such an adjudicatory position would be (much like RJC Judge Hascheff, also a WLS Board of Directors member, whose finding that there was probable cause for the shameful 5/23/13 arrest of Coughlin (incident to RJC Bailiff John Reyes attacking Coughlin and throwing him over a bench) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMU_qWIwZbY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yllvEBtk6C4 Of course, RJC Judge David Clifton ruled during the 9/24/13 status conference in that RCR2013-072675 case that Coughlin would not be afforded court appointed counsel (despite Clifton indicating Coughlin could so avail himself of the Sixth Amendment at the 6/19/13 status conference), and that Coughlin had somehow waived his right to a speedy trial incident to Clifton taking Coughlin's Motion to Proceed IFP/Application for Court Appointed Counsel On The Condition That Coughlin Be Permitted to Appear as Co-Counsel and Retain All Final Decision Making Authority As to Means, Tactics, Objectives and Any Other Matter and running with it sufficient to stick Coughlin was R. Bruce Lindsay as his sole counsel (though such appointment was not even made until, at the very earliest, 6/6/13) and Lindsay allegedly waiving such rights on Coughlin's behalf (despite the fact that Lindsay had already threatened to murder Coughlin, which Coughlin reported to the RJC. Of course, Clifton abused his contempt power some more at the 5/30/13 hearing in 072675 when he made more of hsi threats to have Coughlin gagged with the duct tape the RJC Bailiffs were brandishing upon Coughlin pointing out the flaws in Clifton's scheme to stick Coughlin with Lindsay again (where Lindsay was so instrumental in the RJC's fraudulent "musicial case numbers" approach to denying Coughlin any redress or review of its fraudulent 12/20/12 Administrative Order 2012-01, which Judge Pearson rebranded as a criminal case on 3/6/13 (assigning case number RCR2012-071437, in a display of a former prosecutor turned judge losing his judicial immunity where reverting to the prosecutorial role he formerly occupied as part o

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 10

    Electronically Filed

    Mar 19 2013 10:51 a.m.


    Tracie K. Lindeman
    Clerk of Supreme Court
    Docket 62821 Document 2013-08188

    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    12
    13
    14
    15
    16
    17
    18
    19
    20
    21
    22
    23
    24
    25
    26
    27
    28

    Code 1310




    IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
    IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE
    THE STATE OF NEVADA,

    Plaintiff,
    vs.

    ZACH COUGHLIN,

    Defendant.
    _____________________________________________/


    Case No. CR12-2025

    Dept. No. 10



    CASE APPEAL STATEMENT
    This case appeal statement is filed pursuant to NRAP 3(2).
    1. This appeal is from an order entered by the Honorable Steven Elliott.
    2. Appellant is Zach Coughlin. Appellant is representing himself in Proper Person on
    appeal:
    3. Appellants address is:
    Zach Coughlin
    1471B 9
    th
    Street
    Reno, Nevada 89512

    4. Respondent is the State of Nevada. Respondent is represented by the Washoe
    County District Attorneys Office:
    Terrance McCarthy, Esq.
    P.O. Box 30083
    Reno, Nevada 89520

    5. Respondents attorney is licensed to practice law in Nevada.
    6. Appellant was not represented by appointed counsel in District Court.
    F I L E D
    Electronically
    03-18-2013:01:02:29 PM
    Joey Orduna Hastings
    Clerk of the Court
    Transaction # 3596960

    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    12
    13
    14
    15
    16
    17
    18
    19
    20
    21
    22
    23
    24
    25
    26
    27
    28

    7. Appellant is not represented by appointed counsel on appeal.
    8. Appellant was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the District Court,
    Order Granting in Forma Pauperis filed on J anuary 9, 2013..
    9. Proceeding commenced by the filing of an Appeal from J ustice Court on December
    6, 2012.
    10. This is a criminal proceeding and the Appellant is appealing the Order Granting
    Extension of Time and Striking Defendant's Motions filed on March 8, 2013.
    11. The case has not been the subject of a previous appeal to the Supreme Court:
    12. This case does not involve child custody or visitation.
    13. This is not a civil case involving the possibility of a settlement.
    Dated this 18th day of March, 2013.
    J OEY ORDUNA HASTINGS
    CLERK OF THE COURT


    By: /s/ Annie Smith
    Annie Smith
    Deputy Clerk

    SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
    COUNTY OF WASHOE
    HON. ELLIOTT A. SATTLER
    DEPT.
    Case History - CR12-2025
    D10
    Case ID: Case Type: CR12-2025 CRIMINAL APPEAL 12/6/2012 Initial Filing Date:
    Report Date & Time
    3/18/2013
    1:24:36PM
    Case Description: ZACHARY COUGHLIN VS STATE (D10)
    Parties
    APPE ZACHARY COUGHLIN - @1206272
    RESP STATE OF NEVADA - STATE
    DA Zach Young, Esq. - 9227
    Charges
    Charge No. Charge Code Charge Date Charge Description
    Plea Information
    Charge No. Plea Code Plea Date Plea Description
    Release Information
    Custody Status
    Hearings
    Event Extra Text: MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
    1 D10 12/27/2012 09:35:00 Request for Submission 1/10/2013
    S200 1/10/2013
    Disposition:
    Sched. Date & Time Disposed Date Event Description Department
    Event Extra Text: MOTION TO ENFORCE (MH12-0032)
    AGREEMENT (PAPER ORDER NOT PROVIDED)
    2 D10 1/24/2013 09:00:00 Request for Submission 3/8/2013
    S200 3/8/2013
    Disposition:
    Sched. Date & Time Disposed Date Event Description Department
    Event Extra Text: EMERGENCY 2-27-13 MOTION
    3 D10 2/28/2013 16:50:00 Request for Submission 3/8/2013
    S200 3/8/2013
    Disposition:
    Sched. Date & Time Disposed Date Event Description Department
    Report Does Not Contain Sealed Cases or Confidential Information
    Page 1 of 3
    Case ID: Case Type: CR12-2025 CRIMINAL APPEAL 12/6/2012 Initial Filing Date:
    Report Date & Time
    3/18/2013
    1:24:36PM
    Case Description: ZACHARY COUGHLIN VS STATE (D10)
    Event Extra Text: MOTION FOR STAY OF PROBATION (2 ORDERS
    PROVIDED)
    4 D10 2/28/2013 16:45:00 Request for Submission 3/8/2013
    S200 3/8/2013
    Disposition:
    Sched. Date & Time Disposed Date Event Description Department
    Agency Cross Reference
    Code Agency Description Case Reference I.D.
    Actions
    Code Code Description Text Action Entry Date
    12/6/2012 1175 Appeal from Justice's Court
    12/6/2012 1695 ** Exhibit(s) ...
    STATE'S EXHIBITS A AND B
    DEFENDANT'S EXHIBITS 1 THROUGH 21 and DISK/CD ZACH COUGHLIN
    PD#144825
    12/19/2012 3866 Request/Waive Fees/Costs
    MOTION AND APPLICATION TO WAIVE FEES AND COSTS AND FOR
    EXTENSION OF TIME TO DESIGNATE RECORD ON APPEAL AND FOR
    PREPARATION OF TRANSCRIPT AT PUBLIC'S EXPENSE
    12/19/2012 3862 **Criminal Submit
    DOCUMENT TITLE: MOTION AND APPLICATION TO WAIVE FEES AND
    COSTS AND FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO DESIGNATE RECORD ON
    APPEAL AND FOR PREPARATION OF TRANSCRIPT AT PUBLIC'S
    EXPENSE (PAPER ORDER PROVIDED)
    PARTY SUBMITTING: ZACHARY COUGHLIN
    DATE SUBMITTED: 12-20-12
    SUBMITTED BY: JYOST
    DATE RECEIVED JUDGE OFFICE:
    12/20/2012 4105 Supplemental ... SUPPLEMENTAL PROCEEDINGS
    12/26/2012 2385 Mtn Proceed Forma Pauperis
    12/26/2012 3860 Request for Submission
    DOCUMENT TITLE: MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NO
    PAPER ORDER PROVIDED)
    PARTY SUBMITTING: COUGHLIN, ZACHARY
    DATE SUBMITTED: 12/26/12
    SUBMITTED BY: ACROGHAN
    DATE RECEIVED JUDGE OFFICE:
    12/26/2012 2490 Motion ...
    1/9/2013 3035 Ord Grant in Forma Pauperis
    AND REQUEST FOR PREPARATION OF TRANSCRIPT AT PUBLIC
    EXPENSE - Transaction 3453849 - Approved By: NOREVIEW :
    01-09-2013:17:10:06
    1/9/2013 NEF Proof of Electronic Service Transaction 3453855 - Approved By: NOREVIEW : 01-09-2013:17:12:44
    1/10/2013 S200 Request for Submission Complet
    1/18/2013 2195 Mtn for Stay ... MOTION FOR STAY OR PROBATION
    1/18/2013 2605 Notice to Set TUESDAY, JANUARY 22, 2013 AT 11:00
    1/23/2013 1120 Amended ... AMENDED NOTICE TO SET
    1/23/2013 3860 Request for Submission
    DOCUMENT TITLE: MOTION TO ENFORCE (MH12-0032) AGREEMENT
    (PAPER ORDER NOT PROVIDED)
    PARTY SUBMITTING: ZACHARY COUGHLIN
    DATE SUBMITTED: JAN. 24, 2013
    SUBMITTED BY: TWHITE
    DATE RECEIVED JUDGE OFFICE:
    1/25/2013 2605 Notice to Set 1-29-13 AT 11:00
    1/29/2013 2605 Notice to Set 1-31-13 AT 11:00
    1/31/2013 2605 Notice to Set 2-5-13 AT 10:00
    Report Does Not Contain Sealed Cases or Confidential Information
    Page 2 of 3
    Case ID: Case Type: CR12-2025 CRIMINAL APPEAL 12/6/2012 Initial Filing Date:
    Report Date & Time
    3/18/2013
    1:24:36PM
    Case Description: ZACHARY COUGHLIN VS STATE (D10)
    2/8/2013 NEF Proof of Electronic Service Transaction 3520402 - Approved By: NOREVIEW : 02-08-2013:11:55:58
    2/8/2013 2880 Ord for Briefing Schedule Transaction 3520387 - Approved By: NOREVIEW : 02-08-2013:11:52:40
    2/27/2013 2195 Mtn for Stay ...
    MOTION FOR STAY OF PROBATION AND EMERGENCY MOTION FOR
    ORDER FOR COMPETENCY EVAL AND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
    BRIEF
    2/27/2013 3860 Request for Submission
    DOCUMENT TITLE: MOTION FOR STAY OF PROBATION (2 ORDERS
    PROVIDED)
    PARTY SUBMITTING: ZACH COUGHLIN
    DATE SUBMITTED: 2-28-13
    SUBMITTED BY: S HAMBRIGHT
    DATE RECEIVED JUDGE OFFICE:
    2/27/2013 4105 Supplemental ... SUPPLEMENT TO EMERGENCY MOTION
    2/27/2013 3860 Request for Submission
    DOCUMENT TITLE: EMERGENCY 2-27-13 MOTION
    PARTY SUBMITTING: ZACH COUGHLIN
    DATE SUBMITTED: 2-28-13
    SUBMITTED BY: S HAMBRIGHT
    DATE RECEIVED JUDGE OFFICE:
    3/8/2013 NEF Proof of Electronic Service Transaction 3579637 - Approved By: NOREVIEW : 03-08-2013:14:43:09
    3/8/2013 3030 Ord Granting Extension Time
    AND STRIKING DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS - Transaction 3579613 - Approved
    By: NOREVIEW : 03-08-2013:14:40:10
    3/8/2013 1670 Ex-Parte Mtn...
    FOR EXTENSION OF TIMETO FILE OPENING BRIEF - Transaction 3579659 -
    Approved By: SHAMBRIG : 03-08-2013:15:20:24
    3/8/2013 S200 Request for Submission Complet
    3/8/2013 S200 Request for Submission Complet
    3/8/2013 S200 Request for Submission Complet
    3/8/2013 NEF Proof of Electronic Service Transaction 3579787 - Approved By: NOREVIEW : 03-08-2013:15:23:04
    3/15/2013 2515 Notice of Appeal Supreme Court
    3/18/2013 1310E Case Appeal Statement Transaction 3596960 - Approved By: NOREVIEW : 03-18-2013:13:03:19
    3/18/2013 1350 Certificate of Clerk
    CERTIFICATE OF CLERK AND TRANSMITTAL - NOTICE OF APPEAL -
    Transaction 3596960 - Approved By: NOREVIEW : 03-18-2013:13:03:19
    3/18/2013 NEF Proof of Electronic Service Transaction 3596966 - Approved By: NOREVIEW : 03-18-2013:13:05:04
    Report Does Not Contain Sealed Cases or Confidential Information
    Page 3 of 3
    F I L E D
    Electronically
    03-08-2013:02:39:10 PM
    Joey Orduna Hastings
    Clerk of the Court
    Transaction # 3579613

    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    12
    13
    14
    15
    16
    17
    18
    19
    20
    21
    22
    23
    24
    25
    26
    27
    28

    Code 1350




    IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
    IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE
    THE STATE OF NEVADA,
    Plaintiff,
    vs.

    ZACH COUGHLIN,

    Defendant.
    _____________________________________________/




    Case No. CR12-2025
    Dept. No. 10


    CERTIFICATE OF CLERK AND TRANSMITTAL NOTICE OF APPEAL
    I certify that I am an employee of the Second J udicial District Court of the State of
    Nevada, County of Washoe; that on the 18th day of March, 2013, I electronically filed the
    Notice of Appeal in the above entitled matter to the Nevada Supreme Court.
    I further certify that the transmitted record is a true and correct copy of the original
    pleadings on file with the Second J udicial District Court.
    Dated this 18th day of March, 2013

    J OEY ORDUNA HASTINGS
    CLERK OF THE COURT

    By /s/ Annie Smith
    Annie Smith
    Deputy Clerk
    F I L E D
    Electronically
    03-18-2013:01:02:29 PM
    Joey Orduna Hastings
    Clerk of the Court
    Transaction # 3596960

    You might also like