You are on page 1of 9

Traffic Engineering, 4 Edition Roess, R.P., Prassas, E.S., and McShane, W.R.

FALL 2012
Solutions to Homework No. 4 Chapter 9 Problem 9-1 A limited network counting study was conducted for eth network shown here, Because only two sets of road tubes were available, the study was conducted over a period of several days, using Station A as a control location. The network is shown here. Figure 9.19
1 2 3

th

Using the data from the study, shown in the tables estimate the 12-hour volume (8 am to 8 PM) at each station for the average day. Table 9.14: Axle Counts for Control Station A TIME PERIOD 8:00-11:45 am 12:00 - 3:45 PM 3,000 2,800 3,300 3,000 4,000 3,600

4:00 -7:45 PM 4,100 4,400 5,000

Table 9.15: Axle Counts for Coverage Stations Station 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Day Monday Monday Monday Tuesday Tuesday Tuesday Wednesday Wednesday Wednesday Time 8:00 11:45 12:00 3:45 4:00 7:45 8:00 11:45 12:00 3:45 4:00 7:45 8:00 11:45 12:00 3:45 4:00 7:45 Axle Count 1,900 2,600 1,500 3,000 3,600 4,800 3,500 3,200 4,400

The problem calls for estimating a total 12hour volume for the study data shown. There is one controlcount station (Station A, Figure 9.19) and 9 coveragecount stations (Stations 19, Figure 9.19). There are several issues that must be addressed in the estimation process: Data was taken in three fourhour periods: 8 AM to 12 Noon, 12 Noon to 4 PM, and 4 PM to 8PM. To allow for movement of data crews, however, actual counts were taken for 3.75 hours out of each 4hour period. All counts, therefore, must be multiplied by 4.00/3.75 = 1.067 to estimate the actual 4hr counts. Counts were taken using road tubes, and thus represent axlecounts, not vehiclecounts. Sample data on traffic composition (Table 9.16) must be used to estimate the average number of axles per vehicle, which can than be used to convert axlecounts to vehiclecounts. Counts taken during one 4hour period must be expanded to estimate counts for the 12hour target period. Counts were taken across three days. All counts must, therefore, be adjusted to reflect the average day of the count. These conversions can be done in almost any order, and are best done using a spreadsheet. As all results must be rounded to the nearest vehicle, the order of computations and the rounding mechanism used may cause small discrepancies in final answers. In this solution, rounding is done only in the final step, although most of the spreadsheet tables will appear to be rounded at each step.

Table 1, which follows, computes the average number of axles per vehicle from the sample data of Table 9.16. The total number of axles observed is divided by the total number of vehicles observed to determine the conversion factor.

Average Axles/Vehicle = 2,780/1,276 = 2.18

The data from the Control Count Station A must now be manipulated to produce conversion values for coverage counts. Two conversions must be conducted: a) from 4hr counts to 12hr counts, and b) from 12hr counts on a particular day to 12hr counts representing the average of the three days of the study. The first is accomplished by calibrating the percentage of 12hour volume that occurs in each 4hour period. For each day of the study, the percentage is computed as (V4/V12)*100. There will be different values for each day of the study. These can be applied separately to coverage counts on the same day, or the average percentages can be applied to all three days. The second conversion is accomplished by calibrating daily variation factors for each of the three days of the study. These factors are defined as VAVE/VDAY. The calibration of these values can be based directly on the 3.75hr axlecounts of Table 9.15. These values could be converted to 4hr vehiclecounts and used, but the conversions would affect every number equally, and none of the conversion values would be changed. Table 2 illustrates the computation of these conversion values in spreadsheet form. In terms of expanding counts from 4 hours to 12 hours, the percentages do not vary greatly for each day of the study. Therefore, percentages based upon the average data will be used. Coverage counts are now expanded to full 12hour vehicle counts in Table 3, using the following equation:

V 12i = 1.067 V 3.75i * DFj Pk Where: V12i = 12hour vehicle count for Station i, vehs V3.75i = 3.75hour axle count for Station i, axles 1.067 = expansion factor, 3.75 hrs to 4 hrs DFj = daily adjustment factor for day j pk = percentage of volume occurring during time period k, expressed as a decimal

Table 3: Expansion and Adjustment of Coverage Counts to 12Hour VehicleCounts

Station Day Time Axle Count 1,900 2,600 1,500 3,000 3,600 4,800 3,500 3,200 4,400 Veh Count (/2.18) 872 1193 688 1376 1651 2202 1606 1468 2018 Exp To 4 hr 1.067 1.067 1.067 1.067 1.067 1.067 1.067 1.067 1.067 Exp To 12 hrs .3102 .2831 .4066 .3102 .2831 .4066 .3102 .2831 .4066 Daily Adjustment Factor 1.118 1.118 1.118 1.034 1.034 1.034 0.878 0.878 0.878 12-Hr counts 3352 5026 2019 4895 6435 5975 4849 4857 4650

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Monday Monday Monday Tuesday Tuesday Tuesday Wednesday Wednesday Wednesday

8:00 11:45 12:00 3:45 4:00 7:45 8:00 11:45 12:00 3:45 4:00 7:45 8:00 11:45 12:00 3:45 4:00 7:45

Problem 92 The following control counts were made at state maintained permanent count station. From the information given, calibrate the daily volume variation factors for this station. Table 9.1: Data for Problem 9-2
Day of Week Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Average Annual Volume for Day 3,500 4,400 4,200 4,300 3,900 4,900 3,100

Daily variation factors may be computed as: DF = VAVE V AVG Where: VAVE = average daily count for all days of the week, vehs VDAY = average daily count for each day of the week, vehs These computations are carried out in Table 4. 4 ,. Table 3: Calibration of Daily Adjustment Factors e.g. 4,043/3,500 = 1.155 etc

Problem 9 3 What count period would you select for a volume only study at an intersection with a signal cycle length of (a) 60 seconds, (b) 90 seconds, and (c) 120 seconds.

a)

5 minutes or 15 minutes. Count 4 of 5 or 13 of 15. The counting period and the actual count time must be multiples of 1 minute. 6 minutes or 15 minutes. Count 4.5 of 6 or 12 of 15. The counting period and the actual count time must be multiples of 90 seconds or 1.5 minutes. 6 minutes or 18 minutes. Count 4 of 6 or 16 of 18. The counting period and the actual count time must be multiples of 2 minutes.

b)

c)

Problem 9 4 The following control counts were made at an urban count station to develop daily and monthly factors. Calibrate these factors given the data shown here.

48490 1925

48,490/7 = 6927 e.g. 6927/7700 = .90, 6927 /8400 = .825, 6925/8560 = .809

Table 5: Monthly Adjustment Factors Calibrated

x 31 = 69,750 x 28 = 61,600 x 31 = 62,000 x 30 = 63,000 x 31 = 60,450 x 30 = 55,500 x 31 = 55,800 x 31 = 52,700 x 30 = 60,000 x 31 = 65,100 x 30 = 64,500 x 31 = 71,300 741,700

AADT = 741,700/365 = 2,032 veh/day Monthly factor = 2032/2250 = .904, 2032/2200 = .924 etc. These are factors of the third week of the month as per the data not the middle as requested. You would need to plot these out to the end of the third week of the month and then using the graph locate the end of the second week (middle of the month and obtain the slightly adjusted monthly factor. It aint worth it. Lol

Problem 9 5 The four control stations shown nearby have been regrouped for the purposes of calibrating daily variation factors. Is the group appropriate? IF not, what would be an appropriate grouping be? What are the combined daily variation factors for the approximate group(s)? The stations are located sequentially along a state route. Table 9.20: Daily Variation Factors for Individual Stations
Station 1 2 3 4 Mon 1.04 1.12 0.97 1.01 Tues 1.00 1.07 0.99 1.00 Wed 0.96 0.97 0.89 1.01 Thurs 1.08 1.06 1.01 1.09 Fri 1.17 1.02 0.86 1.10 Sat 0.90 0.87 1.01 0.85 Sun 0.80 0.82 1.06 0.85

The four control count stations of text Table 9.20 are proposed to form a single group for the purpose of calibrating Daily Adjustment Factors DF. To be an appropriate grouping, the average factor for each day of the week cannot differ from the factors at each station by more than 0.10. The grouping is evaluated in Table 7. Table 7: Average Daily Factors for Group and Assessment
1.17

Obviously, four of the factors lie outside the acceptable range. It appears that Station 3 most likely should be eliminated. Assuming that they are still spatially contiguous, Stations 1, 2, and 4 may be grouped, and must again be tested, as shown in Table 8. Table 8: ReGrouped Stations Tested