## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent Variable:Perofinfectedspikesnormal Source Type III Sum of Squares Corrected Model Intercept Varieties mildewareatwevthjoun Varieties * mildewareatwevthjoun Error Total Corrected Total 1397.020 22763.502 3949.297 15 45 44 93.135 2552.277a 527.150 586.819 50.846 541.918 df 29 1 14 1 14 Mean Square 88.010 527.150 41.916 50.846 38.708 F .945 5.660 .450 .546 .416 Sig. .569 .031 .928 .471 .946

a. R Squared = .646 (Adjusted R Squared = -.038)

**The interaction is not significant, F (14, 15) = .416, p = .946
**

Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa Dependent Variable:VAR00008 F 1.600 df1 14 df2 30 Sig. .137

Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent Variable:VAR00008 Source Type III Sum of Squares Corrected Model Intercept VAR00007 Varieties Error Total Corrected Total 36.845

a

df 15 1 1 14 29 45 44

Mean Square 2.456 16.237 .463 2.607 .854

F 2.877 19.017 .542 3.053

Sig. .007 .000 .468 .005

16.237 .463 36.500 24.761 920.130 61.606

a. R Squared = .598 (Adjusted R Squared = .390)

A preliminary analysis evaluating the homogeneity-of-regression (slopes) assumption indicated that the relationship between the covariate and the dependent variable did not differ significantly as a function of the independent variable. p .39=(39%). F (1.542. F(6. Estimated Marginal Means . W2= 36.39. F (1. p .946.854)/61.468. Conclusion. The ANCOVA was not significant.39) of the total variance in FHB achievement scores was accounted for by the seven barley varieties controlling for the effect of the mildew scores.506+. 15) = . F (14. p = .542. This means that the seven barley varieties (the independent variable) account for approximate 39% of the total variance in the % of infected grains with FHB scores (the dependent variable). 29) = .468 w2= . is not significant. 29) = . SST (SS for total). This shows that there is no relationship (effect) between the covariate and the dependent variable.The relationship between the covariate (mildew) and the dependent (FHB) variable. p . 39% ( w2 = 0.416.500-14(. 29) = . MSW (MS for error).854 =-0. W2=SSB -(K-1)MSW/ SST+MSW SSB = SS (for independent variable).39. However.468 w2= . F (1.542. controlling for the effect of their mildew scores (the covariate). This shows that there is no relationship (effect) between the covariate and the dependent variable. The main effect for the independent variable (varieties) is not significant controlling for the effect of the covariate (mildew).

00 7.471 2.065 6.935a 5.576 .821 3.767 5.177 3.00 12.805 4.471 4.692 5.538 .119 3.3041.551 .910 7.535 .372 2.584a 5.706 4.00 3.724a 4.733 a 5.00 6.123 .561 .00 dimensio n1 95% Confidence Interval Std.875 a 3. Profile Plots Between mildew and yield .587a 3.552 Upper Bound 6.509a a.466 5.00 14.00 13.957 Lower Bound 4.966 4.550 .733 3.595 .571 .784 2.380a 3. Covariates appearing in the model are evaluated at the following values: VAR00007 = 5.319 5.696 6.219 a 4.753a 3.950a 4.435 a 4.166 5.248 a 1.00 5.00 4.115 6. Error .615 .586 2.Varieties Dependent Variable:VAR00008 Varieties Mean Dore 2.631 3.555 3.00 15.253 2.508 5.547 .534 .552 .561 .00 11.00 10.00 9.818 5.619 a 8.544 .920 4.468 2.968 a 4.00 3.

000 .075 .006 F 12.000 .642 2. This shows that there is no relationship (effect) between the covariate and the dependent variable.822.633 15 45 44 .746.082 390.103 . R Squared = .550 a df 29 1 14 1 14 Mean Square 1.374 F 6.876 (Adjusted R Squared = .288 df 15 1 1 14 27 43 42 Mean Square .252 39.544 .045 Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.079 .107 .1. F (1.130.679 24.107.286 Sig.143 .746 .989 .15) = . . F (14.556 8.001 .079 . .107 13.079 5.556 . . 27) = . p = .130 23. R Squared = .022 .205 36.115 df1 14 df2 28 Sig. is not significant.260 23. p .922 (Adjusted R Squared = .822 Sig.128a . Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa (LOG)Dependent Variable:VAR00002 F 2.134 114.Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent Variable:Seedperplantnormal Source Type III Sum of Squares Corrected Model Intercept Varieties mildewareatwevthjoun Varieties * mildewareatwevthjoun Error Total Corrected Total 3.598 .000 .386 1.614 .143 . .000 . Design: Intercept + VAR00008 + Varieties Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent Variable:VAR00002 Source Type III Sum of Squares Corrected Model Intercept VAR00008 Varieties Error Total Corrected Total 1.000 a.001 1.160 8.705 1.772) The interaction is not significant.807) The relationship between the covariate (mildew) and the dependent (grain yield) variable.242 a. a.

006)/1. SST (SS for total). 27) = .128 a df 15 1 1 14 27 43 42 Mean Square . controlling for the effect of their mildew scores (the covariate). p .079 . 27) = .13.001 1. A preliminary analysis evaluating the homogeneity-of-regression (slopes) assumption indicated that the relationship between the covariate and the dependent variable did not differ significantly as a function of the independent variable.107. F (1.679 24. is not significant.130. The ANCOVA was significant. W2= 1.705 1.006 F 12. .000 .286 Sig.006 =-0.746.107.143 .001 . p = .160 8. p .286.000 .807) The relationship between the covariate (mildew) and the dependent variable (grain yield). .107 13. 79% (w2 = . . This shows that there is no relationship (effect) between the mildew disease and the grain yield variable. F (14.15) = . MSW (MS for error).103-14(. F (1.107 .822.000 .79.W2=SSB -(K-1)MSW/ SST+MSW SSB = SS (for independent variable). p < . Conclusion. F (14. W2 = 0. Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent Variable:VAR00002 Source Type III Sum of Squares Corrected Model Intercept VAR00008 Varieties Error Total Corrected Total 1.876 (Adjusted R Squared = . R Squared = .143 .79=(79%). However.001.1.746. This means that the fifteeen barley varieties (the independent variable) account for approximate 79% of the total variance in the grain yield (the dependent variable).746 . 27) = .79) of the total variance in grain yield achievement was accounted for by the fifteen barley varieties controlling for the effect of the mildew scores.288+.103 .075 .288 a. The main effect for the independent variable (varieties) is significant controlling for the effect of the covariate (mildew).

516 a 8.168 .00 4.327 a .046 .Varieties Dependent Variable:VAR00002 Varieties Mean Dore 2.052 .00 14.556 .00 3. .074 a .511 a .00 .00 12.523 .525 .039a .341 .053 .395 . Covariates appearing in the model are evaluated at the following values: VAR00008 = 1.044 .046 .055 .045 .4369.374a .045 .659 .132 .438a .00 7.432 a .045 .122 Lower Bound -.348 .527a .466 .715 .422 .00 9.046 .605 .236 .00 dimensio n1 95% Confidence Interval Std.00 10.402a a.417 .619 .046 .00 6.370 .553a .533 .00 15.463a .504 a .00 11.435 -.419 .533 .00 13.343 .045 .620 a .283 .00 5.446 .153 Upper Bound .045 .019 .440a .045 .652 .612 . Error .610 .045 .

- 1-s2.0-S0959652615019307-main
- Economics project on forecasting.
- Finding Order in the Noise a Conceptual Overview on the Shift to Complex Dynamical Models in Psychology
- Efectividad de Adhesivos
- Analysis Of Variances ANOVA.pdf
- Moving Averages
- ANOVA the general factorial model
- Lecture+1 +Introduction
- hasil olah AW.docx
- Aarts 2007 the Nonconscious Cessation of Goal Pursuit When Goals and Negative A
- MR spectroscopic evaluation of N-acetylaspartate's T2 relaxation time and concentration corroborates white matter abnormalities in schizophrenia
- Chapter 9 Multiple Regression Analysis
- Changers
- Forecasting Experiments
- 231
- Lecture 10
- Least Squares Adjustment
- Calibration Models
- MA Assignment 2_G7
- Diiro 2013. Impact of Off-Farm Income on Agricultural Technology Adoption Intensity and Productivity
- T8 Transformation
- bias.pdf
- Impact of Customer Satisfaction on Brand Loyalty an Empirical Analysis of Home Appliances in Pakistan.
- The Effect of Transportation on Affordability in Greater Vancouver
- D5981.pdf
- IJWRAE_1(3)210-218
- SA 606 -P.M.I.S
- Fall 2009_FinalTerm_OPKST_MTH302-5march
- Role of Banks in Indian Economy Report
- PKa Report Format

- Wicking Study
- Chapter 2 Natural Convection Horizontal Cyl.
- mhtl99-1
- Wicking Types
- Chapter 2 Poisson’s Equation.pdf
- Porous Media 3
- HP Per Wallin
- Mixed Con in Porous Media
- د ياسين.pdf
- Natural Cn in Attic
- mhtl99-1
- NC Fins Array
- pipeFlowMATLABa1
- Mixed conv in building.pdf
- Entropy Conv 15
- Mixed Con in Porous Media
- Convective Heat Transfer 1.pdf
- Heat Pipe29
- Flat Heat Pipe 14
- SteadyHeatCond_1D
- F Convection- Internal Flow
- Entropy Conv 15
- Natural Cn in Attic
- Correlation
- pipe cond
- FE ii in solid mech.
- heat pipe 324
- Numerical Solutions via Matlab
- Convection

Sign up to vote on this title

UsefulNot usefulClose Dialog## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Close Dialog## This title now requires a credit

Use one of your book credits to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.

Loading