A series of three articles on project management in the social services from the social services management magazine Social Services Insight. .Payne, M. (1987) ‘In the beginning was the idea’ Social Services Insight 2 13 19-21; Payne, M. (1987) ‘Forming a structure’ Social Services Insight 2 20 21-2; Payne, M. (1987) ‘The final stage’ Social Services Insight 2 20 19-20
A series of three articles on project management in the social services from the social services management magazine Social Services Insight. .Payne, M. (1987) ‘In the beginning was the idea’ Social Services Insight 2 13 19-21; Payne, M. (1987) ‘Forming a structure’ Social Services Insight 2 20 21-2; Payne, M. (1987) ‘The final stage’ Social Services Insight 2 20 19-20
A series of three articles on project management in the social services from the social services management magazine Social Services Insight. .Payne, M. (1987) ‘In the beginning was the idea’ Social Services Insight 2 13 19-21; Payne, M. (1987) ‘Forming a structure’ Social Services Insight 2 20 21-2; Payne, M. (1987) ‘The final stage’ Social Services Insight 2 20 19-20
was the
idea. . .
In the first of three articles on developing and managing projects, Malcolm Payne describes
daw ideas progress through stages to become viable projects
fimes seems artificial to separate particular
ew activities in this way. Doing s0 can cut
rejects off from the streams of activity going on all she
project (he services of an area; it can make them hard to
{nvograte. New projects can seem elitist ~ better, more
‘WMciting, somehow than the ordinary run of things.
In apite of the disadvantages, the reasons why many
new dbvelopments are managed as ‘projects’ is to do with
The hature of the development process. It might be
ne umed that new developments grow rationally from an
asSusement of need, the implementation of a policy
Sésponse to need and an orderly series of stages, as ideas
resPovade conerete and are turned into staff, equipment
ore bricks and mortar. This is not so, because usually @
arviety of human factors, political, economic and social
Tectary and sheer luck (good or bad) influences which
sacerare selected and how they are turned into actuali
‘ew developments in the social services are
Gen created in the form of ‘projects. It some
Social Services Insight, Morch 27, 1987
Project development is increasingly a negotiated pro-
cosa, and this exacerbates the tendency towards irra-
CESur decision making. At one time, social services
Gepartments had long-term development plans, and capi-
{ePllocations. Staffing implications of policy changes
‘xturally followed planned decisions. Development pro~
{rammes were largely ‘in-house’ in response to needs As
Famed by the department's staff and carried through by
local architects departments.
Recently, however, tightening capital allocations
mean that’ developing new activities relies. on special
Yovernment funding, and on finance from joint funding
govether health initiatives. Alternatively, existing
oF sourees must be redeployed. All this means an increas
{ng reliance on negotiated schemes which meet the objec:
tase of other agencies — the MSC’s employment
ENtiatives, for example, or health service priorities
sanetjepartments are forced to channel resources
Shrough housing associations or voluntary bodies to take
1»PROJECTS
‘advantage of financial incentives, such as the residential
care allowance, payable in private and voluntary resi-
dential care but notin social services departments.
Pulling together a package involving complex funding
from different sources and several agencies with a varic
ety of interests means much less certainty and a wider
range of pressures. Changing stream from one set of
priorities to another means negotiating changes in the
‘use of buildings and in the role of staff.
Overall, then, the development process has become
more complex. ‘Projects’ make it, easier to understand
and cope with the uncertainty. Tt enables a group of
disparate interests to be recruited in loyalty to a clear
concept that they can all understand. The range of invol-
vement can be limited, so that the different agencies do
not all need to be committed to the same strategy,
provided they ean agree on individual projects,
This series of articles examines the management of
project development in this environment. The first art
le considers how the development process can be under-
stood. Such understanding makes it easier to control and
‘manipulate events to achieve results, and to manage the
paychological stresses of development work.
‘The second and third articles examine the design of
projects and the implementation of them. Since, gener-
ally, wider involvement in the nature of projects leads to
negotiated solutions, being clear about the content of
projects and responsibility for various aspects of them
becomes more important, Equally, when development of
activities is undertaken in separate project packages, it
is necessary to work hard to integrate them with a
department's other work, to co-ordinate the involvement
and interests of other agencies which take part in the
project with the department's existing work, and also to
ensure that the project is co-ordinated into a network of,
other services and agencies. In addition, the interests of
existing staff must be sorted out, and other effeets on the
department of changes in priority must be managed.
First stage
‘Just as life developed out of a primeval group of mole-
cules in the early stages of earth’s life, so.a project idea
‘must emerge from the primeval soup of ideas slopping
around a department. This is the first stage of project
development, How does it arise? It is often by no means
obvious which projects a department. might pursue.
Everywhere, there will be needs presenting themselves
to the department, ideas generated by staff, problems
apparent in daily operation, demands exerted by other
agencies or opportunities offered by other potential
vice providers in the locality. All these might tum into a
project. Why is it that some of these begin to progress
through the system and others fall away or hang around.
for years as a fervent wish never to be achieved?
‘There are a variety of factors, butthe crucial elementis
the potential availablity of resources. Resources must be
understood here in the broadest. sense. They might
include interest from a committed individual or likely
support from a relevant agency. The offer or opportunity
of finance or expertise might be a factor.
The second factor is whether an idea is defined as an
‘entity. Obviously, ah idea has to be understood asa possi-
ble way of seeing or dealing with a problem before it can
be taken up at all
‘The third factors that.
idea must be seen as needing
SSeARRIERS SS
RESOURCE \ COMMITMENT
Tesources. Again, resources must be understood broadly.
‘An idea to resolve difficulties between a local GP's sur-
gery and an area team might only require a team mem-
ber to allocate time to do liaison work. Nonetheless, this,
is a reallocation of resources (time) from one activity or
priority to another. For it to lead to a project, however,
the second factor is relevant. People must see it as in
some way special, as an entity in the work of the team
which is to be marked out. It would not be a project if it
was just felt to be a process of fitting an activity into a
schedule which was new but fundamentally not different
from the existing aspects of the team member's work.
So itis important to see that the idea of a project has an
entrepreneurial promotional aspect to it. Projects are
identified where a new understanding and extra
resources must be organised. A fourth factor is then that
an idea is seen to need a special effort to achieve results
with it, Diagram 1 summarises the progress of an idea
from the primeval soup of ideas to its definition as a
potential project.
One final requirement of this process is the existence of
collection mechanism for identifying, defining and pro-
‘moting potential project ideas in the department. This is
one of the important roles of management at all levels -
to pick up ideas, define them and set them on a path for
consideration. Often, particular individuals are identi-
fied (either formally or informally) in the department as
the collectors or facilitators of ideas and their processing
into projects. At different levels, this may be done for
ideas of different complexity. Clearly, an idea for a new
day and residential care centre for an new client group
will require definition at the highest level. An idea for a
new liaison system might be retained within a local
team,
Once an idea has emerged into a defined possibility and
there are some resources which might back it, it becomes
available to the department as an option which might be
taken up. Diagram 2 shows the process through which
Sociat Services Ieight, March 37,1087PROJECTS
Project recruits resources.
‘The initial range of resources to be recruited are
‘motivating factors. A project will not get far unless there
are motivating forces pushing it. Generally projects are
motivated by one or more of four factors:
1 Need or demand — where a need is established or
accepted or there is consumer demand,
1m Policy ~ where government or political poliey is
pushing for a particular project, or for action which
the projet might meet, i
Commitment ~ where an individual or group is
personally committed to the idea, °
1m Resources where resources (such as an organisa-
tion with expertise, or specific funding) are or might
be available to this project.
‘The more ofthese factors that exist for any one project,
‘the more likely itis to make progress. Oten, therefore, it
is important to reeruit these factors to push a project,
along, and to get it chosen from among possible options.
‘The next stage is to ereate resource concepts. Although
there must be some general understanding that
resources might be available, it is important to con-
ceptualise what human, physical and financial resources
right be needed, and then to identify as many potential
sources of these resources as possible. Then promoters of
‘project will be in a position to have its practicability
accepted by any dissenters. ‘The size of potential
resources and the likelihood of their delivery will be
crucial to the strength of the project when it starts to
‘meet barriers to implementation
~WEAS™
Changing from one set of priorities to another
means negotiating changes in the role of staff
‘The next stage includes two processes. Links and
alliances must be built up with potential resource
providers. t they are not already partof the projec, they
heed tobe identified and interested in the projet. What
they can offer should be defined, and committed. Usually
the commitment will depend on other commitments.
For example, in setting up a new hostel for the com-
munity eare of mentally ill people, a health authority,
social nervice department, housing association and per-
hhaps one ar more voluntary organisations may be
‘Social Services Inigh, March 27,1067
@ Just as life
developed out of a
primeval group of
‘molecules in the
early stage of earth's
life, so a project idea
must emerge from
the primeval soup of
ideas sloping
around ag
department
——————— Mealeotm Payne
involved. The health authority or social services depart-
ment may have to guarantee a contribution to residents!
fees, and a part capital contribution, before the housing
association can gain housing corporation allocation,
‘which itself will be needed before the health and social
services contribution can be usod. The process of lining
Up all these organisations and not losing some commit-
‘ments before others are achieved is often complex.
"The second process at this stage is to combine these
alliances into resource acquisition strategy which, when
tied together will completely fund both expected recur-
rent and capital costa of the project. Once this strategy
has been arrived at the next stage is the barrier stage.
‘The fact that resources are committed in principle per-
nits development managers to move on to the detailed
planning which will achieve the commitment of
Ze ee ee characteristics of the project.
In a hostel project, for example, a suitable area for the
building must be found, a suitable building for acquisi-
tion, planning and design considerations for that particu-
lar ‘building must be ironed out and legal and
bureaucratic requirements for committing resources to
that building must be completed. Only when the actual
details (this house to that design) are accepted by all
parties, can the in-principle acceptance of a project (some
sort of house to some sort of design) be turned into a
resource commitment. This process is actually like climb-
ing over a series of barriers in the way of getting all
parties to agree to a particular project.
‘Another example, on less complex scale. A scheme for
providing assistance with shopping and practical tasks
for elderly people is required, and a social services
department decides it is a good thing. Extra supervision
from the home help service would be available if the costs
of paying part-time workers’ wages and expenses could
‘be met. A volunteer service paid for by Opportunities for
Volunteering or MSC community programme schemes
are options for paying for this. This is the resource
acquisition strategy. The barrier stage involves making
applications and satisfying the MSC’s and trade union's,
requirements and finding office space. Once this is
achieved the commitment to extra supervision from the
hhome help service comes into play and resources commit-
‘ment is achieved.
‘At this point the detailed design and management of,
the scheme must be considered and this is the subject of
the next two articles 7
‘Maleolim Payne is assistant director for development atthe
Richmond Fellowship
a