ANTI GEN RETRI EVAL TECHNI QUES I N I MMUNOHI STOCHEMI STRY: COMPARI SON OF DI FFERENT METHODS s1rr:No :. iiiri 1 *, ciov:NN: oNc:no 1 , ci:inio crcc:riii 1 , xiirN: iiccioii 1 , :si:si: nisxox:1is 1 , rirN: s:n:11iNi 1 , s1rr:No :sc:Ni 1 , noN:1rii: s:N1iNi 1 , iir i:oio iicc:iic: 1 , oNrii: iroNr 1 , s1rr:Ni: n:xi:Ni 1 , crs:iN: rcoirssi 1 , rrnric: s:Nni 1 , rrnric: iiri 1 , iorNzo iroNciNi 2 :Nn niN:Ncrio r:iiNi 3 1 Second Serviceof Pathologic Anatomy and Haematopathology Section, Bologna University, I taly 2 I nstituteof Pathologic Anatomy, Siena University, I taly 3 Haematopathology Laboratory, I nstituteof Haematology, Perugia University, I taly SUMMARY Routine sections of normal and pathological samples xed in 10 per cent buered formalin or B5, including EDTA-decalcied bone-marrowbiopsies, weretestedwith61antibodiesfollowingheatinginthreedierent uids: 001M citratebuer (pH 60), 01M TrisHCl (pH 80), and1mM EDTANaOH solution(pH 80). Thesectionsunderwent either threecyclesof microwavetreatment (5 mineach) or pressurecookingfor 12min. Thealkalinephosphatase/anti-alkalinephosphatase(APAAP) techniquewasusedasthe standarddetectionmethod;with16antibodiesaslightlymodiedstreptavidinbiotincomplex(SABC)-immunoperoxidasetechniquewas appliedinparallel. Theresultsobtainedwerecomparedwiththoseobservedwithout any antigenretrieval (AR), or followingsection digestionwith005per cent proteaseXIV at 37C for 5min. Chess-boardtitrationtestsshowedthat all antibodiesbut oneprotedby AR. ProteaseXIVdigestionrepresentedthegoldstandardforveantibodies, while55producedoptimal resultsfollowingtheapplication of heat-basedAR. Bycomparisonwiththeotheruids, EDTAappearedtobesuperiorintermsof bothstainingintensityandthenumber of markedcells. Theseresults wereindependent of tissueprocessing, immunohistochemical approach, andheatingdevice. Pressure cookingwasfoundtobemoreconvenient onpractical grounds, asit allowedthesimultaneoushandlingof alargenumber of slidesand atimesavingof 1min30s, representingtheproper timefor thetreatment. 1997byJ ohnWiley&Sons, Ltd. J . Pathol. 183: 116123, 1997. No. of Figures12. No. of Tables4. No. of References29. KEY WORDSantigenretrieval; immunohistochemistry; xation; standardization INTRODUCTION For about 25 years, it was thought that antigen identicationinroutinesectionswassignicantlylimited by the masking eect of xatives, which determine various alterations of tissue structures, such as the formalin-induced cross-linking of proteins. 13 Conse- quently, cryostat sectionsrepresented therst choicefor accurate immunophenotyping, although they often showed poor cytological detail. 2,3 Meanwhile, proteolytic enzymes (such as trypsin, pronase, and pepsin) were used to overcome partially the limitations in antigen accessibility, especially in formalin-xed samples. 13 They wereapplied to routine sections under controlled conditions of concentration, time, and temperature, in order to break some of the bonds produced by xation and to expose a higher number of antigenic epitopes. 1 Sincethebeginning of the1990s, new techniques for antigenretrieval (AR) havebeenproposed, basedonthe exposure of routine sections to high temperatures in aqueous salt or protein denaturant solutions for a few minutes 419 using a Bunsen burner, microwave oven, pressurecooker, or autoclavefor variabletimes. 4,6,7,15,18 The mechanism by which this approach allows the detection of most antigensisnot yet completely dened. Thesenew AR techniques havemainly been applied to formalin-xed, paran-embedded material, on which they also signicantly reduce the negative eects of overxation. 7 This study compares the most popular AR systems, when applied to heterogeneously treated samples under dierent methodological conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS Tissuesampleselection Paran-embedded tissue blocks were randomly selected fromthe les of the Second Service of Patho- logic Anatomy/Haematopathology Section of Bologna University. They had been xed either in 10 per cent buered formalin (for times ranging from 24h to 1 week) or in B5 (for 22h 30 min). 20 Someof thelatter blockswerebone-marrowneedlebiopsieswhich, follow- ing xation, had been decalcied in EDTA for 2h 30 min. 20 All of the specimens had been similarly processed, as previously described. 20,21 The selected *Correspondenceto: Professor Stefano A. Pileri, Secondo Servizio di Anatomia Patologica e Sezione di Ematopatologia, Universit di Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, I taly. Contract grant sponsors: AI RC, Milan; CNR (ACRO 10), Rome; MURST, Rome; A.B.S.T.E., Bologna. CCC 00223417/97/09011608 $17.50 Received 27 September 1996 1997 by J ohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Accepted 6 March 1997 blocks were representative of a variety of conditions: normal bone-marrow and placenta, hyperplastic lymph nodes, malignant lymphomas of all the histotypes of theRevised EuropeanAmerican LymphomaClassica- tion, 22 acutenon-lymphoidleukaemias(M1M7accord- ing to the FAB Classication), 23 breast carcinoma, colonic carcinoma, gastric carcinoma, prostatic adeno- carcinoma, endometrial adenocarcinoma, papillary thy- roid carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma of thelarynx, intermediate cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, retino- blastoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma. Serial sections were obtained fromeach block, collected on silane-coated or naturally charged slides (Dako ChemMate Capillary Gap Slides, BioTek Solutions, U.S.A.), and allowed to dry overnight (at 37C and 57C, respectively), in order to ensureoptimal adhesion. Beforeimmunohisto- chemistry, sections were dewaxed, rehydrated, and rinsed in running water, as previously described. 20 Antigen retrieval (AR) Sixty-one specic antibodies (Tables I I V) were applied to serial sections which had received no pre- vious treatment or had undergone the following AR procedures. Enzymatic digestionRehydrated sections were immersed in buer solution for 10 min and then trans- ferred to a 005 per cent proteaseXI V (Sigma, U.S.A.) solution for 5 min, according to previous reports. 1,3,20 Both the buer and the enzymatic solution had been pre-warmed in a thermostatic water bath at 37C and this temperature was maintained throughout the whole procedure. After theproteolytic treatment, thesections wereplacedincoldbuer (at 4C) for 10min, inorder to block theactivity of theenzyme. Microwave treatment001x citrate buer (Na citratecitric acid) (pH 60), 7 01x TrisHCl buer (pH 80), 18 and 1mx EDTANaOH solution (pH 80) 15,24 were used as retrieval solutions. Rehydrated sections wereimmersed in each retrieval solution and processed in a microwave oven with the power set at 750W for three cycles (5 min each). The same number of slides (n=20) was always placed in a rectangular plastic stain- ing jar (Kartell, U.S.A., codenumber 353), which con- tained 200ml of retrieval solution and was located in the centre of the oven, covered by a loose-tting cap. Thelevel of theuid was constantly maintained during the procedure by adding distilled water and retrieval solution alternately followingeach cycle. After thecom- pletion of thethird cycle, sections wereallowed to cool at room temperature for 20 min and then rinsed in distilled water and buer. Microwave ovens with and without a rotary plate were used (Bauknecht MCI D 1125 Duo, Germany; Philips M742, TheNetherlands). Pressure cookingTwo litres of each retrieval solution were placed in a stainless steel 6-litre capacity pressurecooker with an operating pressureof 103kPa/ 15psi (LagostinaNE I rradial Plus, I taly) andbrought to theboil ona15kW electrichotplatewithout sealingthe lid. Fifty rehydrated sections wereplaced in metal racks and lowered into the boiling retrieval solution. The pressure cooker was then sealed and brought to full pressure. Theheatingtimebeganonlywhenfull pressure wasreached. I nthisstudy, heatingtimesof 1min, 1min 30s, and 2min wereemployed. At full time, thecooker was depressurized and cooled under running water; the lidwasthenremoved; andthehot buer wasushedout with cold water froma running tap. Carewas taken to ensure that the sections did not dry. The cooled slides werewashed twicein buer solution, prior to immuno- histochemical staining. Antibodies and immunohistochemical methods The61antibodies listed in Tables I I V wereused for the study and detected by a three-layer-alkaline phos- phatase anti-alkaline phosphatase (APAAP) tech- nique, 25 which was carried out either manually or automatically [on a TechMate 500 immunostainer (DAKO, Denmark; BioTek, U.S.A.)]. The reaction was always developed with new fuchsin in steering for 20 min. 25 When a rabbit polyclonal antibody was used astheprimary reagent, thesection wasincubated with a mouse anti-rabbit monoclonal antibody diluted 1:30 (DAKO, Denmark, code number M0737) for 30 min, beforestarting with theAPAAP technique. Sixteen antibodies were also tested by a slightly modied streptavidinbiotin complex (SABC) immuno- peroxidase method, which included overnight incu- bation in the primary antibody at 4C and was carried out manually, as previously described. 26 A chess-board titration was performed for each anti- body, aimingto assessitsoptimal workingdilution with each AR system. 01x PBS (pH 72) and 01x TBS (pH 76) respect- ively were used for the APAAP and SABC-based investigations. Evaluation of results The results were independently evaluated by six observers (CC, BF, LL, SAP, DS, and ES) and were graded as follows: , completely negative result; +, weak positivity in a percentage of cells expected to be positive; ++, weak positivity in all cellsexpected to bepositive; +++, moderately strong positivityinall cellsexpectedto bepositive; ++++, very strongpositivity in all cells expected to bepositive. The agreement amongfour out of sixobserverswasregarded as consensus. RESULTS Antigen retrieval system TablesI I V summarizethendingsobtained with the 61 antibodies employed. Theworking dilution for each reagent was chosen by applying the APAAP technique and the most ecient AR method, in order to provide optimal results with both xatives and independently of 117 STANDARDIZATION AND ANTIGEN RETRIEVAL 1997 by J ohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd. oiN:i or i:1noiocx, voi. 183: 116123 (1997) the length of xation in formalin. Tables I I V also include the optimal dilutions with the 16 antibodies, which in parallel were revealed by the immunoperoxi- dase method. Because of the overnight incubation, the dilutions with the latter usually appeared higher than those with the APAAP technique, but the results with the two methods remained comparable in terms of sensitivity (Tables I I V). High temperature vs proteolytic enzymeI n most instances, high temperatures proved more eective than protease XI V, by allowing either the emergence of otherwise undetectable antigens or higher working dilutions (e.g., KP1/CD68=1:640 vs. 1:100; PG-M1/ CD68=1:20 vs. 1:5; MNF 116/cytokeratins=1:140 vs. 1:70; anti- 1 -fetoprotein=1:16000 vs. 1:2000) (TablesI I V). Heat-basedantigenretrieval (HBAR) was TableI Results obtained under dierent methodological conditions with theantibodies most commonly used in thestudy of the haemolymphopoietic systemand related disorders Clone Specicity Source Dilution No AgR PT HBAR+ citrate HBAR+ TrisHCl HBAR+ EDTA O10 CD1a I mmunotech 1:40 + ++ ++++ Poly CD3 DAKO 1:300 ++ + ++ ++++ C8/144B CD8 Dr Mason 1:6 ++ ++ ++++ 1:400 + +++ ++++ C3D-1 CD15 DAKO 1:6 + + ++ ++++ 1:320 ++ +++ +++ ++++ L26 CD20 DAKO 1:200 + + ++++ ++ ++++ 1:3200 + + +++ +++ ++++ I F8 CD21 DAKO 1:10 ++++ MHM6 CD23 DAKO 1:50 + +++ ++++ Ber-H2 CD30 Professor Stein 1:10 ++ +++ ++++ 1:320 + +++ ++++ QBEND-10 CD34 BioGenex 1:20 + +++ +++ ++++ 1:400 + ++ ++ ++++ BerMACDRC CD35 DAKO 1:5 + ++++ + + MAB89 CD40 I mmunotech 1:100 ++++ DF-T1 CD43 DAKO 1:200 + +++ +++ ++++ 1:1600 ++ +++ ++++ ++++ PD7/26+2B11 CD45 DAKO 1:200 + +++ ++++ ++++ 1:4000 + +++ ++++ UCHL-1 CD45R0 DAKO 1:120 + ++ ++ ++++ +++ Ki-B3 CD45R Professor Parwaresch 1:80 ++ + +++ ++++ ++++ 1:320 ++ + +++ ++++ ++++ 4KB5 CD45RA DAKO 1:20 ++ ++++ +++ +++ CD57 Becton 1:20 ++ ++ +++ +++ ++++ Y2/51 CD61 DAKO 1:5 +++ + + +++ KP1 CD68 DAKO 1:640 + ++ ++++ ++ ++++ PG-M1 CD68 Professor Falini 1:20 + ++ ++ ++ ++++ J CB117 CD79a Dr Mason 1:10 + +++ +++ ++++ Kim-4p Follicular dendritic cells Professor Parwaresch 1:5 ++++ ++ ++ + DBA.44 Hairy cells Professor Delsol 1:5 ++ ++++ +++ ++++ J C159 GlycophorinA DAKO 1:320 + ++++ +++ +++ NP57 Neutrophilic elastase DAKO 1:10 ++++ M616 FVI I I RAg DAKO 1:6 + ++ ++++ ++ ++++ Poly Lysozyme DAKO 1:800 ++ +++ ++++ ++++ ++++ Poly I gA DAKO 1:2000 + +++ ++++ +++ ++++ Poly I gG DAKO 1:5000 ++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ Poly I gM DAKO 1:5000 ++ ++++ ++++ ++++ Poly I gD DAKO 1:1000 +++ +++ ++++ Poly -I g light chain DAKO 1:10000 ++ +++ ++++ +++ +++ Poly -I g light chain DAKO 1:12000 ++ +++ ++++ +++ +++ Poly Protein S-100 DAKO 1:2000 ++ +++ ++++ +++ ++++ Poly MPO DAKO 1:10000 ++ +++ +++ +++ ++++ CD=cluster of dierentiation; No AgR=no antigen retrieval; PT=proteolytic treatment; HBAR=heat-based antigen retrieval; Poly=polyclonal antibody; FVI I I RAg=Factor VI I I -related antigen; MPO=myeloperoxidase. I n bold: overnight incubation of theprimary antibody+SABC technique. =completely negativeresult; +=weak positivity in a percentageof cells expected to bepositive; ++=weak positivity in all cells expected to bepositive; +++=moderately strongpositivity in all cellsexpected to bepositive; ++++=very strongpositivity in all cellsexpected to bepositive. 118 S. A. PILERI ET AL. 1997 by J ohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd. oiN:i or i:1noiocx, voi. 183: 116123 (1997) particularly suitable for some antibodies, such as Ber-H2, which in heterogeneously xed material pro- duces unpredictable results with the enzyme method (Fig. 1). On the other hand, when switching from protease XI V to HBAR, the polyclonal antibodies against I g heavy and light chains did not show a dramatic increase in their working dilution, but gave a signicant reduction in background staining. Further- more, high temperatures gave rise to a remarkable lowering of dierential staining intensities between the borders and centre of improperly xed samples, while they never caused the exposure of non-specic neo- antigens. The proteolytic enzyme completely abolished the reactivity of ten antibodies (Tables I I V). On the other hand, ve reagents denitely beneted from this approach: I F8/CD21, BerMACDRC/CD35, Kim-4p, CS 14, and MAB89(TablesI I V and Fig. 2). Thiswas most evident in formalin-xed material, the staining being unpredictablein B5-xed samples. Theantibody NP57(anti-neutrophil elastase) worked properly only on untreated sections (Table I ). Other reagents also produced satisfactory staining when applied without any previous unmasking procedure: however, their working dilutions in that case appeared to bemuchlower thanthoseallowedbyappropriateAR (e.g., DF-T1/CD43=1:50vs. 1:200; Ki-B3/CD45R=1:10 vs. 1:80; 34E11/low molecular weight cytokeratins= 1:25 vs. 1:100; V9/vimentin=1:5 vs. 1:200; HHF35/ human muscleactin=1:25 vs. 1:400). Comparison of the dierent uids used for HBAR The best results, in terms of both staining intensity and thenumber of positivecells, wereachieved by using 1mx EDTA (pH 80) with all but six antibodies (i.e., Table I I Results obtained under dierent methodological conditions with a panel of antibodies raised to intermediate lament proteins Clone Specicity Source Dilution No AgR PT HBAR+ citrate HBAR+ TrisHCl HBAR+ EDTA MNF 116 Cytokeratin DAKO 1:140 +++ ++++ ++++ ++++ 1:700 +++ ++ +++ ++++ 34E12 CytokeratinHMW DAKO 1:100 + +++ ++++ +++ 35H11 CytokeratinLMW DAKO 1:100 ++ +++ +++ ++++ V9 Vimentin DAKO 1:200 + +++ +++ ++++ D33 Desmin DAKO 1:200 +++ + ++++ +++ ++++ 1:6400 +++ + +++ +++ ++++ 2F11 Neurolaments DAKO 1:60 +++ ++ +++ ++++ 1:5000 +++ ++ +++ ++++ No AgR=no antigen retrieval; PT=proteolytic treatment; HBAR=heat-based antigen retrieval; HMW=high molecular weight; LMW=low molecular weight. I n bold: overnight incubation of theprimary antibody+SABC technique. =completely negativeresult; +=weak positivity in a percentageof cells expected to bepositive; ++=weak positivity in all cells expected to bepositive; +++=moderately strongpositivity in all cellsexpected to bepositive; ++++=very strongpositivity in all cellsexpected to bepositive. TableI I I Results obtained under dierent methodological conditions with a panel of antibodies raised to cell kinetics, oncogene, and virus-associated antigens Clone Specicity Source Dilution No AgR PT HBAR+ citrate HBAR+ TrisHCl HBAR+ EDTA 124 bcl-2 geneproduct DAKO 1:20 +++ ++++ ++++ PG-B6 bcl-6 geneproduct Professor Falini 1:2 ++++ DO-7 p53 DAKO 1:160 +++ +++ ++++ 1:900 ++ ++ ++++ c-erbB-2 BioGenex 1:600 + ++ +++ ++++ Rb1 Retinoblastoma geneproduct BioGenex 1:300 + ++++ MI B-1 Ki-67 antigen Professor Gerdes 1:25 + + ++++ CS 14 LMP-1 DAKO 1:7 ++ CCH2+DDG9 CMV DAKO 1:35 +++ +++ ++++ ++++ Poly HP DAKO 1:20 + + +++ ++++ ++++ No AgR=no antigen retrieval; PT=proteolytic treatment; HBAR=heat-based antigen retrieval; LMP-1=latent membrane protein 1; CMV=cytomegalovirus; HP=Helicobacter pylori. I n bold: overnight incubation of theprimary antibody+SABC technique. =completely negativeresult; +=weak positivity in a percentageof cells expected to bepositive; ++=weak positivity in all cells expected to bepositive; +++=moderately strongpositivity in all cellsexpected to bepositive; ++++=very strongpositivity in all cellsexpected to bepositive. 119 STANDARDIZATION AND ANTIGEN RETRIEVAL 1997 by J ohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd. oiN:i or i:1noiocx, voi. 183: 116123 (1997) UCHL1, 4KB5, anti- I g light chain, anti- I g light chain, 34E12, and HMB45), which proved to bemore sensitive to the employment of one of the other uids (Tables I I V). TrisHCl turned out usually to be less ecient than EDTA, but often superior to citratebuer (TablesI I V) (Figs38). Theseresultswereindependent of theheat source, natureof theantibodies (polyclonal vs. monoclonal), and typeof xation (formalin vs. B5). Notably, EDTA provided superior results with all the nuclear antigens tested: Ki-67, bcl-6, p53, and Rb1 (Fig. 9). Microwave oven irradiation vs. pressure cookingNo signicant dierences in the immunostaining were observed using the microwave ovens or the pressure cooker, AR ecacybeingmainlydueto thetypeof uid employed. At times, the preservation of cytological detail was slightly inferior in the sections which under- went pressure cooking, but this limitation was largely overcome by shortening the procedure and by the larger number of slides which could be treated simultaneously. Pressure cooking provided the best results, irrespec- tiveof theuid employed, when thetreatment lasted 1 min 30s. Tissuexation Proteolytic enzyme gave occasional advantages in terms of AR only in formalin-xed material, whilst the heat-based systems turned out to beequally eectivein formalin and B5-xed tissuesamples, including EDTA- decalcied bone-marrowbiopsies(Figs1012). Further- more, section exposureto high temperatures minimized Table I VResults obtained under dierent methodological conditions with a panel of antibodies directed against molecules relevant for thestudy of malignant tumours Clone Specicity Source Dilution No AgR PT HBAR+ citrate HBAR+ TrisHCl HBAR+ EDTA HHF35 Actin DAKO 1:400 + ++ +++ +++ ++++ E29 EMA DAKO 1:5 ++ ++ +++ +++ ++++ HMB45 Melanoma-associated antigen DAKO 1:50 + ++++ +++ ER-PR8 PSA DAKO 1:30 + +++ ++++ 1:800 + + +++ ++++ Poly -hCG DAKO 1:16000 ++ +++ ++++ +++ ++++ 1:50000 ++ +++ +++ +++ ++++ Poly 1 -Fetoprotein DAKO 1:16000 ++ +++ +++ ++++ Thyroglobin DAKO 1:4000 ++ ++ ++++ +++ ++++ Poly Chromogranin A DAKO 1:8000 + + ++ ++++ ++++ BBS/NC/VI -H14 NSE DAKO 1:100 ++ +++ +++ ++++ 1D5 Oestrogen receptor DAKO 1:160 ++ ++++ Po Progesteronereceptor DAKO 1:50 ++ ++ ++++ No AgR=no antigen retrieval; PT=proteolytic treatment; HBAR=heat-based antigen retrieval; EMA=epithelial membrane antigen; PSA=prostatic-specic antigen; -hCG=-human chorionic gonadotropin; NSE=neuro-specic enolase. I n bold: overnight incubation of theprimary antibody+SABC technique. =completely negativeresult; +=weak positivity in a percentageof cells expected to bepositive; ++=weak positivity in all cells expected to bepositive; +++=moderately strongpositivity in all cellsexpected to bepositive; ++++=very strongpositivity in all cellsexpected to bepositive. Fig. 1CD30 staining in a lymph nodebiopsy taken froma patient with nodular sclerosing Hodgkins diseaseand xed in formalin for 1 week (antigen retrieval by EDTA and pressurecooking; APAAP technique) Fig. 2Detection of follicular dendritic cells in a hyperplastic lymph nodeby theCD21monoclonal antibody (antigen retrieval by proteaseXI V; APAAP technique) Figs35Dierent stainingintensitiesof folliclecentrecellsby theJ CB117/CD79amonoclonal antibody when dierent retrieval uidsareapplied (Fig. 3: Na citrate; Fig. 4: TrisHCl; Fig. 5: EDTA; pressurecooking; APAAP technique) Figs68Antigenretrieval byNacitrate, TrisHCl, andEDTA givesnegative, moderatelypositive, andstronglypositiveresults, respectively, when theanti-PSA monoclonal antibody is applied to sections froma prostatic adenocarcinoma (pressurecooking; APAAP technique) Fig. 9Detection of theproliferation-associated nuclear antigen Ki-67in a hyperplastic lymph nodeby theMI B-1monoclonal antibody (antigen retrieval by EDTA and pressurecooking; APAAP technique) Fig. 10Bone-marrowbiopsy: detection of B- (a) and T-cells (b) within a lymphoid reactiveinltrate(antibodies J CB117/CD79a and polyclonal anti-CD3, respectively; antigen retrieval by EDTA and pressurecooking; APAAP technique) Fig. 11Bone-marrow biopsy: positivity of neoplastic cells with the KP1/CD68 antibody in a non-lymphoid acute leukaemia of the M5 type (antigen retrieval by EDTA and pressurecooking; APAAP technique) Fig. 12Bone-marrowbiopsy: theantibodyagainst myeloperoxidasestainsafewresidual cellsinthesameacutenon-lymphoidleukaemiaasinFig. 11 (antigen retrieval by EDTA and pressurecooking; APAAP technique) 120 S. A. PILERI ET AL. 1997 by J ohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd. oiN:i or i:1noiocx, voi. 183: 116123 (1997) or abrogated thedierences in stainingamong24h and 1 week formalin-xed samples. DISCUSSION I n 1991, two independent groups reported that exposure of routine sections to high temperatures in an aqueous medium could improve the detection of antigens by overcoming the masking eect of formalin xations. 4,27 Since then, articles dealing with the prob- lemof AR in routine sections have been ourishing in theliterature, based on heating or exposureto a strong alkali or acid. At present, HBAR methodsaredailyused in histopathology laboratories, as they havebeen found to be more eective and more easily applicable than other AR systems. However, theuids and heat sources employed vary fromsite to site: 16 this does not favour standardization in immunohistochemistry, which is felt to be relevant by many researchers and public institu- tions. 18 Even themechanisms by which thesenewtech- niques are so eective in antigen unmasking are still unclear. Cattoretti andSuurmeijer 16 suggestedthat heat andhydrolysismaybothdenaturateandbreak thetissue proteins at or near the links made by the formalin between adjacent amino acids and thought it conceiv- able that self-assembly of unfolded protein chains with subsequent restorationof antigenicsitesoccurswhenthe retrieval solution is allowed to cool. Shi et al. 18 have stressed that the pH of the retrieval solution is an important cofactor for some antigens. Morgan et al. 15 have reported that tight complexing of calcium ions or other divalent metal cations with proteins during formaldehyde xation can be responsible for masking certain antigens; thus, the chelation or precipitation of these ions can represent a critical step in salt-mediated AR. Thehigh temperatures might beneeded to provide sucient energy to releasethecalciumionsand divalent metal cations from the cage-like complexes that they formwith tissueproteins. 15 The present study gives further support to the usefulness of HBAR and provides new information in order to transformthis kitchen approach into a more standardized tool. Tissuexation and processing To thebest of our knowledge, this is therst demon- stration that HBAR is very eective in re-exposing a largenumber of relevant antigens both in B5-xed and in B5-xed, EDTA-decalcied material. This nding expandsthepreviouslimitedexperienceonthetopicand answers some pending questions. Ho et al. 28 reported that microwave AR does not signicantly improve the detectionof I glight chainsinB5-xedmaterial when4x urea is applied as the retrieval solution. Cattoretti and Suurmeijer indicated that the B5-xed tissues can be stained with a large panel of antibodies after heat unmasking, basedonour preliminaryresults. 16 Morgan et al. 15 concluded their paper dealing with EDTA/ EGTA-mediated AR by stressing the need for further studies to assess whether these uids might be equally eective in tissues submitted to decalcication. Our results clearly show that when retrieval solutions other than4x ureaareemployed, bothB5-xedandB5-xed, EDTA-decalcied samples are excellent candidates for HBAR, the quality of immunostaining being improved with a large variety of polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies and someantigens becomingreliably accessi- ble for the rst time (Tables I I V): this statement is relevant, as B5 xation and EDTA decalcication are quitecommonly used in haematopathology. Theobser- vation that HBAR is eective in B5-xed material further points to the importance of high temperature as a cofactor in antigen unmasking. This is in keeping with the nding that even alcohol-xed tissues, which do not contain cross-linked proteins, benet from the treatment. 16 Our results with HBAR in formalin-xed samples parallel those previously reported in the literature. 419 On the whole, HBAR turned out to be superior to enzymatic treatment in most instances (Tables I I V). Heat sources I nour hands, pressurecookingshowedseveral advan- tagesover microwaveheating. I n particular, asreported by Norton et al., 14 it isan eectiveand reliablemethod, very easy to use, which allows the simultaneous treat- ment of largebatches of slides; it is not time-consuming for technologists and it needs only very cheap equip- ment. Furthermore, pressure cooking avoids the main drawback of microwaves, namely theoccurrenceof hot and cold spots, which impairs AR eciency, especially when heating many slides. Although heatingof sections is thesametool at work in both pressurecooking and microwaveheating, some dierences should exist in the mechanism(s) by which the two methods produce their positive action. I n fact, besides the dierent exposure times, the microwave approach requiresprolonged coolingto achieveoptimal results, whilepressurecooking does not. Contrary to what has been thought in the past, 18 overheating does not reduce tissue immunoreactivity. According to Mason and OLeary 29 who showed that temperatures from70C to 90C haveno adverseeect on formalin-xed proteins, it is conceivable that the bonds produced by xation protect the epitopes from denaturation to some extent during HBAR. This hypothesis is supported by theobservation that HBAR can bedetrimental in samples xed in formalin for very short times (data not shown): in that case, the high temperaturesmight denatureproteinsnot yet completely protected by xation. AR uids Three dierent AR uids were employed: 001x citrate buer (pH 60), 01x TrisHCl (pH 80), and 1mx EDTA (pH 80). The rst is currently the most widely used medium; 16,18 thesecond representsan inter- esting proposal from Shi et al.; 18 and the third was originally described by Morgan et al. 15 for the detec- tion of the Ki-67 antigen in routine sections and was 122 S. A. PILERI ET AL. 1997 by J ohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd. oiN:i or i:1noiocx, voi. 183: 116123 (1997) subsequently found to bevery eectivefor theretrieval of a xation-resistant epitopeof thebcl-6 product. 24 Among these solutions, EDTA turned out to be the most ecient with the vast majority of the antibodies tested and independently of the location of the target molecule(intranuclear, intracytoplasmic, or membrane- bound). Citratebuer moreoften produced thepoorest results, bothintermsof immunostainingintensityandin terms of the number of positive cells. The ecacy of TrisHCl was intermediate. I n conclusion, this study provides evidence that the choice of the retrieval uid is crucial with the new AR techniques. Two alternatives are possible: either to chooseamediumwhich guaranteesan excellent average with most antibodies, or to nd theideal recipefor each antibody. Theformer approach seems to bemoreprac- tical if one favours standardization in histopathology: AR by pressure cooking and EDTA represents a proposal to that end. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This paper was supported by grants from AI RC (Milan), CNR (ACRO 10) (Rome), MURST (Rome), and A.B.S.T.E. (Bologna). REFERENCES 1. Pileri S, SerraL, Martinelli G. Theuseof pronaseenhancessensitivityof the PAP method in the detection of intracytoplasmic immunoglobulins. Bas Appl Histochem1980; 24: 203207. 2. Taylor CR. Principles of microscopy. I n: Taylor CR, ed. I mmunomicro- scopy: A Diagnostic Tool for the Surgical Pathologist. Philadelphia: W B Saunders, 1986; 2022. 3. Falini B, Pileri S, Martelli MF. Histological and I mmunohistological Analysis of Human Lymphoma. Vol. 9. CRC Press, 1989; 351419. 4. Shi S-R, Key ME, Kalra KL. Antigen retrieval in formalin-xed, paran embedded tissues: an enhancement method for immunohistochemical stain- ing based on microwave oven heating of tissue sections. J Histochem Cytochem1991; 39: 741748. 5. Suurmeijer AJ H. Microwave-stimulated antigen retrieval. A new method facilitating immunohistochemistry of formalin-xed, paran embedded tissue. HistochemJ 1992; 24: 597 (Abstract). 6. Cattoretti G, Becker HG, Key G, et al. Monoclonal antibodies against recombinant parts of the Ki-67 antigen (MI B 1 and MI B 3) detect proliferating cells in microwave-processed formalin-xed paran sections. J Pathol 1992; 168: 357363. 7. Cattoretti G, Pileri S, Parravicini C, et al. Antigen unmaskingon formalin- xed, paran embedded sections. J Pathol 1993; 171: 8398. 8. Gown AM, deWever N, Battifora H. Microwave-based antigenic un- masking. A revolutionary new technique for routine immunohistochemis- try. Appl I mmunohistochem1993; 1: 256266. 9. Suurmeijer AJ H, Boon ME. Notes on the application of microwaves for antigen retrieval in paran and plastic sections. Eur J Morphol 1993; 31: 144150. 10. Van den Berg F, Claessen N, Mulder J , Polak M, Volkers H, Oerhaus GJ A. Target unmasking uid (TUF) for immunohistochemistry in (archival) paran embedded tissue. Eur Clin Lab 1993; 20: 24. 11. Leong ASY, Milios J . An assessment of the ecacy of the microwave antigen-retrieval procedure on a range of tissue antigens. Appl I mmuno- histochem1993; 1: 267274. 12. MomoseH, Mehta P, Battifora H. Antigen retrieval by microwaveirradia- tion in lead thiocyanate. Comparison with protease digestion. Appl I mmunohistochem1993; 1: 7782. 13. Taylor CR, Shi S-R, Chaiwun B, Young L, I mamSA, CoteRJ . Strategies for improving the immunohistochemical staining of various intranuclear prognostic markers in formalinparan sections: androgen receptor, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, p53 protein, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, and Ki-67antigen revealed by antigen retrieval techniques. HumPathol 1994; 25: 263270. 14. Norton AJ , J ordan S, Yeomans P. Brief, high-temperatureheat denatura- tion (pressurecooking): a simpleand eectivemethod of antigen retrieval for routinely processed tissues. J Pathol 1994; 173: 371379. 15. MorganJ M, Navabi H, SchmidKW, J asani B. Possibleroleof tissue-bound calciumionsincitrate-mediatedhigh-temperatureantigenretrieval. J Pathol 1994; 174: 301307. 16. Cattoretti G, Suurmeijer AJ H. Antigen unmasking on formalin-xed paran-embedded tissues using microwaves: a review. Adv Anat Pathol 1995; 2: 29. 17. Miller K, Auld J , J essup E, RhodesA, Ashton-Key M. Antigen unmasking in formalin-xed routinely processed paran wax-embedded sections by pressure cooking: a comparison with microwave oven heating and traditional methods. AdvAnat Pathol 1995; 2: 6064. 18. Shi S-R, I mam SA, Young L, Cote RJ , Taylor CR. Antigen retrieval immunohistochemistry under the inuence of pH using monoclonal anti- bodies. J HistochemCytochem1995; 43: 193201. 19. Miller RT, EstranC. Heat-inducedepitoperetrieval withapressurecooker. Suggestions for optimal use. Appl I mmunohistochem1995; 3: 190193. 20. Pileri S. Linfomi maligni non-Hodgkin: dalla tecnica alla diagnostica. Bologna: Societ EditriceEsculapio, 1985. 21. Pileri S, Falini B, Sabattini E, Bigerna B, Gherlinzoni F, Tazzari PL. I mmunohistochemistry of malignant lymphomas. Advantages and limita- tions of the new monoclonal antibodies working in paran sections. Haematology 1991; 76: 226234. 22. Harris N, J aeE, Stein H, et al. A Revised EuropeanAmerican classica- tion of lymphoid neoplasms: aproposal fromtheI nternational Lymphoma Study Group. Blood 1994; 84: 13611392. 23. Bennett J M, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, et al. Proposals for theclassication of the acute leukemias. A report of the FrenchAmericanBritish (FAB) co-operativegroup. Br J Haematol 1976; 33: 451458. 24. Flenghi L, BigernaB, Fizzotti M, et al. Monoclonal antibodiesPG-B6aand PG-B6p recognize, respectively, a highly conserved and a formol-resistant epitopeon thehuman BCL-6 protein amino-terminal region. AmJ Pathol 1996; 148: 15431553. 25. Cordell J L, Falini B, Erber WN, et al. I mmunoenzymatic labelling of monoclonal antibodies using immune complexes of alkaline phosphatase and monoclonal anti-alkaline phosphatase (APAAP complexes). J HistochemCytochem1984; 32: 219229. 26. Santini D, Ceccarelli C, Mazzoleni G, Pasquinelli G, J asonni VM, Martinelli GN. Demonstration of cytokeratin intermediate laments in oocytesof thedevelopingand adult human ovary. Histochemistry 1993; 99: 311319. 27. Shin RW, I waki T, Kitamoto T, Tateishi J . Hydrated autoclave pretreatment enhances TAU immunoreactivity in formalin-xed normal and Alzheimers diseasebrain tissue. Lab I nvest 1991; 64: 693702. 28. Ho J , Shintaku I P, Preston M, Said J W. Can microwaveantigen retrieval replace frozen section immunohistochemistry in the phenotyping of lymphoidneoplasms?A comparativestudyof kappaandlambdalight chain staining in frozen sections, B5-xed paran sections, and microwaveurea antigen retrieval. Appl I mmunohistochem1994; 2: 282286. 29. Mason J T, OLeary TJ . Eects of formaldehyde xation on protein secondarystructure: acalorimetricandinfraredspectroscopicinvestigation. J HistochemCytochem1991; 39: 225231. 123 STANDARDIZATION AND ANTIGEN RETRIEVAL 1997 by J ohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd. oiN:i or i:1noiocx, voi. 183: 116123 (1997)