Professional Documents
Culture Documents
P E RS P E C T I V E A R TI C L E
Venous ulcers: A reappraisal analyzing the effects of neuropathy, muscle involvement, and range of motion upon gait and calf muscle function
Michael I. Shiman, BS1; Barbara Pieper, PhD2; Thomas N. Templin, PhD2; Thomas J. Birk, PhD, MPT3; Asha R. Patel, BS1; Robert S. Kirsner, MD, PhD1,4
1. Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, 2. College of Nursing, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, 3. Department of Health Care Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, and 4. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
Reprint requests: Robert S. Kirsner, MD, PhD, Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine, PO Box 016250 (R250), Miami, FL 33136. Tel: 11 305 243 4472; Fax: 11 305 243 6191; Email: RKirsner@med.miami.edu Manuscript received: August 24, 2008 Accepted in nal form: December 1, 2008 DOI:10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00468.x
ABSTRACT Chronic venous insufciency is a complex disease that can result in severe sequelae including venous ulceration. Though the exact progression from chronic venous insufciency to venous ulcer remains unclear, the high cost and burden of this disease on patients and society is quite clear. Sustained ambulatory venous pressures or venous hypertension plays an integral role in the development of venous ulceration and involves the failure of the calf muscle pump system. Standard of care involves compression therapy to assist the calf muscle pump. However, several cofactors may contribute to or exacerbate this disease and understanding their impact may provide insight into new treatment modalities. Nerve involvement, which may result in neuropathic pain and muscle dysfunction, alterations in mobility and a decrease in range of motion may lead to gait alterations all affecting calf muscle pump function. In this paper, we analyze these cofactors and discuss possible treatment options to target them. Physicians treating this disease should be aware of the numerous factors involved in its development. Exploring new treatment options may 1 day lessen the burden and suffering caused by venous insufciency.
Chronic venous insufciency is a common disorder that has a signicant impact on quality of life and healthcare costs in our society.1 Representative of this, approximately 7 million Americans suffer from chronic venous insufciency at an average cost of $40,000 over a lifetime.1 One consequence, and among the most important, is the formation of a venous leg ulceration.2 While the exact pathophysiologic mechanisms that lead from venous disease to venous ulcers are not entirely known; several hypotheses have been developed. Theories have been proposed that attribute factors including pericapillary brin cuff formation leading to poor oxygen and nutrient exchange, trapping of growth factors within this cuff, and white blood cell plugging of capillaries.35 Integral to all hypotheses and to this process is the development of venous hypertension, or more accurately sustained ambulatory venous pressure.6 Attempts to reverse venous hypertension have been targeted in the treatment and prevention of venous ulcers.7 The chronic nature of this disease, signicant burden it places on society, and emerging data, leads to a reassessment of several cofactors that may play a role in the progression from venous hypertension to venous leg ulceration (Figure 1). This paper will review nerve and muscle disturbances, mobility or range of motion changes, and gait alterations in patients with venous disease which may alter calf muscle pump function and contribute to the pathogenesis of venous ulcers. Understanding the roles of these cofactors in venous leg ulceration may have implications for the treatment of this disease.
c 2009 by the Wound Healing Society Wound Rep Reg (2009) 17 147152
Shiman et al.
The nancial burden of venous ulcers is evident in high cost and loss of productivity in the workforce.14 In 2004, skin ulcers and wounds were estimated to incur 9.7 billion dollars in direct and 2.2 billion dollars in indirect costs.15 A study done by Olin et al.16 highlighted the costs incurred in inpatient and outpatient treatment of patients with venous stasis ulcers. The average total medical cost per patient was $9,685, with a median cost of $3,036. This study accounted for hospitalizations, home healthcare, and home dressing changes which accounted for 25, 48, and 21% of total costs, respectively.16 These costs underestimate the true burden of venous ulcers as factors including time missed from work, forced early retirement, loss of independent functional status, and suffering were not taken into account. Additionally, inationary changes make current care of venous ulcers more expensive. Combining the estimated cost per patient and the prevalence of this disease, the total cost was estimated to be 1% of the total healthcare budget in Western European countries.17
nous pressure in the deep and supercial venous system decreases from approximately 100 mmHg at rest to about 30 mmHg during contraction.18,19 Despite a pressure gradient during contraction created by increased venous pressures in the thigh veins and decreased pressures in the leg veins, retrograde blood ow is precluded by competent one-way valves in the veins.18 Functioning valves prevent the retrograde ow of blood to the supercial venous system. These one-way bicuspid valves reopen as the pressure in the deep venous system decreases as blood empties into the heart.6 The localization of the reux in either the supercial or deep veins was less signicant than the actual volume of the reux.18 Attributing venous hypertension to one or two causative factors would be an oversimplication of this complex disease. The multifactorial pathogenesis of chronic venous insufciency should be noted. Raju et al.20 studied 373 limbs with ambulatory venous hypertension to identify the etiology. They concluded that contributing components were: poor calf muscle pump, reux, increased arterial inow, reduced venous capacitance, poor ejection fraction, and a combination of the above.20 Thus, treatment of this condition should also be multifactorial.
Shiman et al.
controlled trials to be effective as treatment options for properly selected patients.24,25 As adjuvants to compression therapy, several medications, i.e., aspirin, pentoxifylline, daon, and sulodexide have demonstrated their effectiveness in trials.7,22,26 Varied levels of evidence support surgical techniques which have been employed such as autologous skin grafting, living skin equivalents, debridement, and venous surgery.27 31 Among these treatments, the best evidence exists for bilayered living skin equivalents.7,32 Potential treatments, e.g., granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor and keratinocyte growth factor-2, have been either found to be inconvenient or ineffective.33,34 Gohel et al.35 compared compression therapy alone to compression plus venous surgery. Their randomized-controlled trial found surgical correction of supercial venous reux in addition to compression did not improve ulcer-healing rates. However, surgery did reduce the recurrence rate and increase ulcer free time. Some patients appear more likely to respond to compression therapy. Understanding the prognostic factors in venous ulcers is important to identify patients who may benet from additional and alternative therapies. Among a number of studies, Margolis et al.36 described a two point scoring system based on wound size (> 5 cm2) and wound duration (> 6 months) to predict healing after 24 weeks of compression. Their research showed that 93% of patients healed when having none of their criteria, while only 13% of patients healed when having both of their criteria. Phillips et al.37 analyzed the results of a large multicenter venous ulcer trial and concluded that baseline ulcer size and duration are signicant prognostic indicators. They noted that an ulcer which is slow to heal after 3 weeks of optimal therapy has a poor prognosis as well.37 Another predictive tool is a scoring system developed by Falanga et al.38 which evaluates characteristics of the wound bed score and was shown to have validity in predicting complete wound closure. This scoring system takes into account the following: the healing edges, presence of eschar, greatest wound depth/granulation tissue, amount of exudate, edema, periwound dermatitis, periwound callus and brosis, and a pink/red wound bed. A diagnostic test shown to reliably predict prognosis of venous ulcers by assessing muscle pump function is air plethysmographic exam.39 It is suggested, but not known, whether improvement in calf muscle function leads to better results in air plethysmographic exam.39 Patients with poor prognostic characteristics may nd benet in alternative therapies, in conjunction with the current standard of care.
NEUROPATHY
Local tissue destruction in chronic venous insufciency develops in conjunction with damage to peripheral nerves which has been demonstrated in both clinical and immunohistochemical studies.40,41 Nerve involvement may be an underappreciated cofactor in chronic venous insufciency with possible implications for treatment of venous ulcers. Reinhardt et al.40 performed a neurological study on 30 patients with chronic venous insufciency and compared the results to healthy controls. All patients with conditions predisposing to peripheral neuropathy were exc 2009 by the Wound Healing Society Wound Rep Reg (2009) 17 147152
cluded from the study. They found that patients with chronic venous insufciency had a prolongation of distal motor latency, a reduced vibration threshold, and diminished warmth and cold perception. Their conclusion based on these clinical ndings was that patients with chronic venous insufciency had disturbances in A-a bers, A-b bers, A-d bers, and thermoafferent-C bers.40 Biopsy specimens from the nerves of patients with chronic venous insufciency conrmed neuropathic changes and revealed denervation.42 In 2004, Guest et al.41 used immunohistochemistry to conrm the presence of peripheral neuropathy in patients with venous ulcers. These researchers performed punch biopsies adjacent to venous ulcers in patients with healing ulcers, nonhealing ulcers, and control patients with varicose veins. Antibodies were used to study the distribution of nerve bers in the epidermis and papillary dermis. Compared with controls, patients with healing ulcers had a decreased number of nerve bers in the dermis. Patients with nonhealing ulcers had a decreased number of nerve bers in the epidermis, and both groups had shorter nerve bers in the epidermis. These ndings conclude that the initial development of venous ulcers may be inuenced by reduced dermal and epidermal innervations. Also, chronic ulcers may be inuenced by a decrease in epidermal nerve bers, which may be important in the healing process.41 In 2007, Ogrin et al.43 studied the changes in the neurovasculature of chronic venous ulcers in patients treated with four-layer compression bandaging. They found that after therapy, patients improved their electrical cutaneous perception thresholds. In addition to a panoply of other functions, nerves also serve as a source of growth factors which appear to be important in healing. For example, the topical application of nerve growth factor to pressure ulcers has been shown to improve healing rates.44,45 Landi et al.45 revealed in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that patients who received daily application of a solution of nerve growth factor had a statistically signicant improved rate of healing compared with controls. Tuveri et al.46 treated chronic vasculitic leg ulcers with nerve growth factor and observed rapid healing in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Less striking improvements were observed in patients with systemic sclerosis. While the effect of nerve growth factor on venous ulcers has not been studied, it is likely that its effect is not limited to pressure ulcers alone. This may lead to new treatment options. While the pain of venous ulcers has long been ignored, pain is now known to be a signicant problem.47,48 Based on a questionnaire, 64% of patients believed to have ulcers with a purely venous etiology reported having severe pain.47 A multicenter cross-sectional study in 2007 revealed that leg ulcers are very painful. There is also a direct correlation between ulcer duration and size to pain and quality of life.49 Dworkin et al.50 studied venous ulcers in injection drug users and concluded that pain is present in this group. Pain was associated with a poor coping ability and a decreased quality of life.50,51 In another study of the same cohort, pain was one of the symptoms with the most profound impact on quality of life.52 Much of this pain may be neuropathic in origin and often medications such as amitriptyline, gabapentin, and
149
Shiman et al.
pregabalin among others are useful in dealing with this pain.5355 Nerve involvement is an understudied cofactor in venous ulcers. Further studies are needed to elucidate the role of nerve involvement and to identify potential targets for therapy. Treating the neuropathic pain or using nerve growth factor, e.g., in patients with venous leg ulcers may have therapeutic effects.
GAIT ABNORMALITIES
Few studies have been performed to identify the relationship between chronic venous insufciency and gait alterations. Pieper et al.64 used the Tinetti Balance and Gait tests to assess the effects of chronic venous insufciency on walking. In this study, patients who injected drugs into the lower extremities and therefore were known to be at high risk for venous disease, were found to have lower balance and gait scores than those drug abusers that either did not inject drugs or injected into their arms only.60,64 Patients with venous ulcers may also have an abnormal walking motion. Newland et al.65 evaluated the gait of patients with venous disease. Using pedal pressure measurements to identify differences compared with controls, foot pressures were measured as a surrogate method to study gait. Patients with chronic venous insufciency were observed to have lower total foot pressures. The distribution of pressure was also altered, with chronic venous insufciency patients having higher midfoot and lower big toe pressures.65 Additionally, patients with venous ulcers have also been shown to take fewer steps per week compared with controls.66
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
Clinicians and researchers should be aware of the multifactorial pathogenesis of chronic venous insufciency in order to denitively diagnose and manage this disease and its sequelae. Understanding that neuropathy, neuropathic pain, decreased mobility, or gait changes may be present, may assist clinicians in diagnosing the underlying venous insufciency. Neuropathic pain may be managed with medications aimed at alleviating it such as amitriptyline, gabapentin, or pregabalin. Further studies assessing nerve growth factor in patients with venous ulceration are needed to test the efcacy of this treatment. Recommending physical therapy to teach and supervise calf muscle exercises to improve the calf muscle pump and treating concomitant osteoarthritis and other conditions limiting ankle mobility are important modalities of treatment. Identifying gait changes in patients with chronic venous insufciency is essential in understanding mobility issues and the risk of falls. Ambulatory changes in patients with venous ulcers need to be further studied along with physical rehabilitation and gait training to supplement current treatment of venous ulcers. These approaches can potentially improve healing rates or help decrease recurrences in patients affected by venous ulcerations (Table 1). In conclusion, advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of venous ulcerations have led to the appreciation that venous ulcers should not be simplied solely as a pathology of blood vessels. This disease should be regarded as a multifaceted, complex syndrome involving all aspects of the calf muscle pump. Relevant and emerging research suggests that changes in nerve and muscle function and range of motion may affect gait and ambulation either causal in disease formation or leading to an exacerbation or progression of disease symptomatology. Based on the signicant prevalence of this disease, as well as its considerable health and economic burden on society, we believe a new, multifactorial approach to treatment should be evaluated. Additional studies of the
c 2009 by the Wound Healing Society Wound Rep Reg (2009) 17 147152
Shiman et al.
Table 1. Potential treatment options for cofactors involved in the formation of venous leg ulceration 13. Cofactors Neuropathy Pain related to neuropathy Impaired ankle range of motion Potential treatment options Nerve growth factor Amitriptyline Gabapentin Pregabalin Calf muscle exercises Physical therapy evaluation and treatment plan Treatment of osteoarthritis and other joint limiting conditions Gait training exercises 14.
15.
Gait abnormalities
16.
neuropathic changes, ankle mobility, muscle alterations, and gait abnormalities may provide clues to new treatment modalities. Studies using pain control, nerve growth factors, exercise, and gait training are potential options for future research. Further studies to assess these parameters and to clarify the causeeffect relationship of many of these factors will help elucidate the pathophysiologic development of venous ulcers, and potentially alternative treatments.
17.
18. 19.
REFERENCES
1. Weingarten MS. State-of-the-art treatment of chronic venous disease. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 32: 94954. 2. Rudolph DM. Pathophysiology and management of venous ulcers. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 1998; 25: 24855. 3. Browse NL, Burnand KG. The cause of venous ulceration. Lancet 1982; 2: 2435. 4. Falanga V, Eaglstein WH. The trap hypothesis of venous ulceration. Lancet 1993; 341: 10068. 5. Thomas PR, Nash GB, Dormandy JA. White cell accumulation in dependent legs of patients with venous hypertension: a possible mechanism for trophic changes in the skin. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988; 296: 16935. 6. Valencia IC, Falabella A, Kirsner RS, Eaglstein WH. Chronic venous insufciency and venous leg ulceration. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001; 44: 40121. 7. de Araujo T, Valencia I, Federman DG, Kirsner RS. Managing the patient with venous ulcers. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138: 32634. 8. Simpson S, Roderick P. Varicose veins and venous ulcers. In: Simpson S, Roderick P, Stevens A, Raferty J, editors. Health care needs assessment: the epidemiologically based needs assessment reviews. Oxford: Radcliffe Publisher, 2004: 190. 9. Baker SR, Stacey MC. Epidemiology of chronic leg ulcers in Australia. Aust NZ J Surg 1994; 64: 25861. 10. Nelzen O, Bergqvist D, Lindhagen A. Venous and non-venous leg ulcers: clinical history and appearance in a population study. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 1827. 11. Rudolph D. Standards of care for venous leg ulcers: compression therapy and moist wound healing. J Vasc Nurs 2001; 19: 207. 12. Nelson EA, Harper DR, Prescott RJ, Gibson B, Brown D, Ruckley CV. Prevention of recurrence of venous ulceration:
c 2009 by the Wound Healing Society Wound Rep Reg (2009) 17 147152
20.
21.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
randomized controlled trial of class 2 and class 3 elastic compression. J Vasc Surg 2006; 44: 8038. Baptista CM, Castilho V. Cost survey of procedure with unna boot in patients with venous ulcer. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2006; 14: 9449. Abbade LP, Lastoria S. Venous ulcer: epidemiology, physiopathology, diagnosis and treatment. Int J Dermatol 2005; 44: 44956. Bickers DR, Lim HW, Margolis D, Weinstock MA, Goodman C, Faulkner E, Gould C, Gemmen E, Dall T; American Academy of Dermatology Association, Society for Investigative Dermatology. The burden of skin diseases: 2004 a joint project of the american academy of dermatology association and the society for investigative dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006; 55: 490500. Olin JW, Beusterien KM, Childs MB, Seavey C, McHugh L, Grifths RI. Medical costs of treating venous stasis ulcers: evidence from a retrospective cohort study. Vasc Med 1999; 4: 17. van Gent WB, Hop WC, van Praag MC, Mackaay AJ, de Boer EM, Wittens CH. Conservative versus surgical treatment of venous leg ulcers: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. J Vasc Surg 2006; 44: 56371. Recek C. Conception of the venous hemodynamics in the lower extremity. Angiology 2006; 57: 55663. Meissner MH, Moneta G, Burnand K, Gloviczki P, Lohr JM, Lurie F, Mattos MA, McLafferty RB, Mozes G, Rutherford RB, Padberg F, Sumner DS. The hemodynamics and diagnosis of venous disease. J Vasc Surg 2007; 46 (Suppl. S): 4S24S. Raju S, Neglen PN, Carr-White PA, Fredericks RK, Devidas M. Ambulatory venous hypertension: component analysis in 373 limbs. Vasc and Endo Surg 1999; 33: 25766. Borges EL, Caliri MH, Haas VJ. Systematic review of topic treatment for venous ulcers. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2007; 15: 116370. Carr SC. Diagnosis and management of venous ulcers. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 2008; 20: 825. Samson RH, Showalter DP. Stockings and the prevention of recurrent venous ulcers. Dermatol Surg 1996; 22: 3736. Bergan JJ, Sparks SR. Non-elastic compression: an alternative in management of chronic venous insufciency. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2000; 27: 839. Davis J, Gray M. Is the unnas boot bandage as effective as a four-layer wrap for managing venous leg ulcers? J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2005; 32: 1526. Trent JT, Falabella A, Eaglstein WH, Kirsner RS. Venous ulcers: pathophysiology and treatment options. Ostomy Wound Manage 2005; 51: 3854. Falanga V, Margolis D, Alvarez O, Auletta M, Maggiacomo F, Altman M, Jensen J, Sabolinski M, Hardin-Young J. Rapid healing of venous ulcers and lack of clinical rejection with an allogeneic cultured human skin equivalent. human skin equivalent investigators group. Arch Dermatol 1998; 134: 293300. Kirsner RS, Mata SM, Falanga V, Kerdel FA. Split-thickness skin grafting of leg ulcers. The University of Miami Department of Dermatologys Experience (19901993). Dermatol Surg 1995; 21: 7013. Eaglstein WH, Falanga V. Tissue engineering and the development of Apligraf, a human skin equivalent. Clin Ther 1997; 19: 894905.
151
Shiman et al.
30. Eaglstein WH, Falanga V. Chronic wounds. Surg Clin North Am 1997; 77: 689700. 31. Olivencia JA. Subfascial endoscopic ligation of perforator veins (SEPS) in the treatment of venous ulcers. Int Surg 2000; 85: 2669. 32. Muhart M, McFalls S, Kirsner RS, Elgart GW, Kerdel F, Sabolinski ML, Hardin-Young J, Eaglstein WH. Behavior of tissue-engineered skin: a comparison of a living skin equivalent, autograft, and occlusive dressing in human donor sites. Arch Dermatol 1999; 135: 9138. 33. Jaschke E, Zabernigg A, Gattringer C. Recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor applied locally in low doses enhances healing and prevents recurrence of chronic venous ulcers. Int J Dermatol 1999; 38: 3806. 34. Robson MC, Phillips TJ, Falanga V, Odenheimer DJ, Parish LC, Jensen JL, Steed DL. Randomized trial of topically applied repifermin (recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor-2) to accelerate wound healing in venous ulcers. Wound Repair Regen 2001; 9: 34752. 35. Gohel MS, Barwell JR, Taylor M, Chant T, Foy C, Earnshaw JJ, Heather BP, Mitchell DC, Whyman MR, Poskitt KR. Long term results of compression therapy alone versus compression plus surgery in chronic venous ulceration (ESCHAR): randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2007; 335: 83. 36. Margolis DJ, Berlin JA, Strom BL. Which venous leg ulcers will heal with limb compression bandages? Am J Med 2000; 109: 159. 37. Phillips TJ, Machado F, Trout R, Porter J, Olin J, Falanga V. Prognostic indicators in venous ulcers. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000; 43: 62730. 38. Falanga V, Saap LJ, Ozonoff A. Wound bed score and its correlation with healing of chronic wounds. Dermatol Ther 2006; 19: 38390. 39. Simka M. Calf muscle pump impairment and delayed healing of venous leg ulcers: air plethysmographic ndings. J Dermatol 2007; 34: 53744. 40. Reinhardt F, Wetzel T, Vetten S, Radespiel-Tro ger M, Hilz MJ, Heuss D, Neundo rfer B. Peripheral neuropathy in chronic venous insufciency. Muscle Nerve 2000; 23: 8837. 41. Guest M, Parmar JH, Bunker C, Rowe A, Davies AH. Conrmation of peripheral neuropathy in patients with venous ulceration through immunohistochemistry. Int J Ang 2004; 13: 17681. 42. Taheri SA, Heffner R, Williams J, Lazar L, Elias S. Muscle changes in venous insufciency. Arch Surg 1984; 119: 92931. 43. Ogrin R, Darzins P, Khalil Z. Neurovascular changes after four-layer compression bandaging in people with chronic venous leg ulcers. Phlebology 2007; 22: 4955. 44. Bernabei R, Landi F, Bonini S, Onder G, Lambiase A, Pola R, Aloe L. Effect of topical application of nerve-growth factor on pressure ulcers. Lancet 1999; 354: 307. 45. Landi F, Aloe L, Russo A, Cesari M, Onder G, Bonini S, Carbonin PU, Bernabei R. Topical treatment of pressure ulcers with nerve growth factor: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139: 63541. 46. Tuveri M, Generini S, Matucci-Cerinic M, Aloe L. NGF, a useful tool in the treatment of chronic vasculitic ulcers in rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 2000; 356: 173940. 47. Hofman D, Ryan TJ, Arnold F, Cherry GW, Lindholm C, Bjellerup M, Glynn C. Pain in venous leg ulcers. J Wound Care 1997; 6: 2224. 48. Ryan S, Eager C, Sibbald RG. Venous leg ulcer pain. Ostomy Wound Manage 2003; 49 (Suppl. 4): 1623.
49. Wiffen P, Collins S, McQuay H, Carroll D, Jadad A, Moore A. Anticonvulsant drugs for acute and chronic pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 2, Art. No.: CD001133, doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001133.pub2 50. Pieper B, Rossi R, Templin T. Pain associated with venous ulcers in injecting drug users. Ostomy Wound Manage 1998; 44: 548, 607. 51. Pieper B, Szczepaniak K, Templin T. Psychosocial adjustment, coping, and quality of life in persons with venous ulcers and a history of intravenous drug use. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2000; 27: 22737. 52. Palfreyman SJ, Tod AM, King B, Tomlinson D, Brazier JE, Michaels JA. Impact of intravenous drug use on quality of life for patients with venous ulcers. J Adv Nurs 2007; 58: 45867. 53. Dworkin RH, Backonja M, Rowbotham MC, Allen RR, Argoff CR, Bennett GJ, Bushnell MC, Farrar JT, Galer BS, Haythornthwaite JA, Hewitt DJ, Loeser JD, Max MB, Saltarelli M, Schmader KE, Stein C, Thompson D, Turk DC, Wallace MS, Watkins LR, Weinstein SM. Advances in neuropathic pain: diagnosis, mechanisms, and treatment recommendations. Arch Neurol 2003; 60: 152434. 54. Jensen TS, Finnerup NB. Management of neuropathic pain. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2007; 1: 12631. 55. Guarnera G, Tinelli G, Abeni D, Di Pietro C, Sampogna F, Tabolli S. Pain and quality of life in patients with vascular leg ulcers: an Italian multicentre study. J Wound Care 2007; 16: 34751. 56. Back TL, Padberg FT Jr., Araki CT, Thompson PN, Hobson RW II. Limited range of motion is a signicant factor in venous ulceration. J Vasc Surg 1995; 22: 51923. 57. Dix FP, Brooke R, McCollum CN. Venous disease is associated with an impaired range of ankle movement. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2003; 25: 55661. 58. Back TL, Padberg FT Jr., Araki CT, Thompson PN, Hobson RW II. Limited range of motion is a signicant factor in venous ulceration. J Vasc Surg. 1995; 22: 51923. 59. Pieper B, Templin TN, Birk TJ, Kirsner RS. Effects of injectiondrug injury on ankle mobility and chronic venous disorders. J Nurs Scholarsh 2007; 39: 3128. 60. Pieper B, Kirsner RS, Templin TN, Birk TJ. Injection drug use: an understudied cause of venous disease. Arch Dermatol 2007; 143: 13059. 61. Yang D, Vandongen YK, Stacey MC. Changes in calf muscle function in chronic venous disease. Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 7: 4516. 62. Padberg FT Jr., Johnston MV, Sisto SA. Structured exercise improves calf muscle pump function in chronic venous insufciency: a randomized trial. J Vasc Surg 2004; 39: 7987. 63. Margolis DJ, Knauss J, Bilker W. Medical conditions associated with venous leg ulcers. Br J Dermatol 2004; 150: 267 73. 64. Pieper B, Templin TN, Birk TJ, Kirsner RS. Chronic venous disorders and injection drug use: impact on balance, gait, and walk speed. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2008; 35: 301 10. 65. Newland MR, Patel AR, Prieto L, Boulton AJM, Pacheco M, Kirsner RS. Neuropathy and gait disturbances in patients with chronic venous ulcers: a pilot study. Arch Dermatol (in press). 66. Clarke-Moloney M, Godfrey A, OConnor V, Meagher H, Burke PE, Kavanagh EG, Grace PA, Lyons GM. Mobility in patients with venous leg ulceration. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007; 33: 48893.
c 2009 by the Wound Healing Society Wound Rep Reg (2009) 17 147152
152