This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
hristians are commanded by God to be prepared to give an answer to questions regarding their faith in Jesus Christ of the Bible as well as to questions regarding their recognition of the Bible as the authoritative, God-breathed, and infallible Word of God.
“But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear:”—1 Peter 3:15. King
James Bible "Authorized Version", Cambridge Edition.
The demonically inspired erroneous Liberalsocialist worldview, whether theistic or atheistic in nature manifests in the minds of those who have adoted its underlying so-called ‘Progressive’ ideology that assumes an irrational and presuppositional rejection of the authority of Scripture—God's authority, and inspires Liberal-socialists to create in their own minds an alternative reality—a delusional, nonexistent reality—and a fabricated inflated, narcissistic image of themselves as intellectually and spiritually elevated, elite socalled ‘Master Thinkers’ who are, so they believe, enlightened with a mystical Gnosticlike illumination in their minds that they delusionally believe justifies their assuming postions of authority within all facets of society is destroying the American experiment in government of the people and threatening to
strip the God endowed Liberty that Americans have realized as a function of its having been recognized in our nation’s founding documents.
Sociology vs. Faith:
“Faith is belief in what has not been observed by the senses (see Hebrews 11:1). In order to reason logically, a person must believe in laws of logic. However, laws of logic are immaterial and therefore cannot be observed by the senses. So, belief in laws of logic is a type of faith. Moreover, laws of logic only have rational justification in the Christian faith system.” (answering genesis.org. ‘Logical Fallacies: Bifurcation.’ By Dr. Lisle, AiG-US, on Sept. 7, 2009. Footnote number 3.)
Sociologists like "...Robin Williams (1970) …” have “…offered lists of basic values…” which include achievement, efficiency, material comfort, nationalism, equality, and the
supremacy of science and reason over faith.” (‘Sociology: A Brief Introduction. 8th Edition.’
By Richard T. Schaefer. McGraw Hill. Copyright 2009. N.Y., N.Y.)
An assertion such as that of ‘the supremacy of science and reason over faith’ is audacious, unreasonable, and unfounded—it lacks scientific evidence and amounts to nothing more than a spurious assertion.
This presumptuous philosophical conviction of sociologists makes idols out of perversions of the meaning of science and reason. It is the intellectual perversions of the meaning of science and reason by Sociology upon which the morally relative religious
dogma of the religion of Liberalism, also known as “Progressivism,” or in the case that it claims to be secular—Secularism, or Secularhumanism, or Humanism, is invalidly constructed; and it is upon this indefensible, morally relative religious dogma that adherents to the religion of Liberalism construct their irrational, delusional worldview that results in their advocacy of indefensible Marxist political ideology that manifests itself in both Socialism and Communism, universally recognized as ‘birds of a feather.’
Though at its core religious in nature, Liberal-socialism, or Socialism, is primarily an economic dimension of Marxist, Humanist— though often claiming to be secular in nature and therefore “Secular-humanist,”
philosophical ideology, while Communism is the parallel dimension of corresponding political philosophical ideology constructed upon invalid assumptions of the religion of Humanism, or Liberal-socialism, or Socialism, or “Progressivism,” or Marxism which are codified as conjectural, presuppositional religious dogma in the highly subjective science of Sociology.
The U.S. State Department determines the policies with which it conducts international relations with other nation-states upon the fundamental values determined by the doctrines and tenets of the religion of Liberalsocialism, and so effectively promotes and exports those policies around the world.
Instead of shining the light of liberty, America advances the shadow of tyranny across the world—the shadow cast by the darkness effected upon the minds of men when they turn from the truth to embrace the lie of Liberalism: That they may ‘be as gods,’ ‘Master Thinkers,’ ‘Community Organizers,’ ‘Legislative Leaders,’ ‘Supermen,’ knowing good from evil, that is to say having the enigmatically gifted from a ‘spirit of the Age,’ a Zeitgeist, superior ability, a verstehen, to ‘save the people from themselves,’ and dictate within their own delusional construct of reality, their Sitz im Leben, what is morally right and what is to be deemed morally wrong, (hence the adoption of Moral Relativism as a fundamental tenet of their faith), on any given Sunday according to the whims—the lusts—of their hearts.
Biblical principles once embraced by the Founders of the United States as the standard for good and evil, right and wrong, in determining government policy in relations with other nation-states have been replaced as the guiding light for policy making within the State Department and America now reaps the
whirlwind of her apostasy in that the tyranny of Liberal-socialist governments has spread prolifically worldwide in no small way due directly to the failure of the American government to advance biblical standards of righteousness as reflected in the concept of ‘government of the people’ that is codified in the American constitutional Republic’s founding documents, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States of America.
Perversions of the understanding of the meanings of science and reason have become the Liberal-socialist’s belief system, the “Progressive’s” religion, the Democrat’s religious dogma, the Secular-humanist’s god.
Sociologists, disillusioned with the supernatural, that is to say with God, have constructed, in embracing their faulty philosophical ideologies, the foundation of a sociological religious dogma upon their perversions of the meanings of science and reason in which men are recognized as capable of being as gods—‘Supermen,’ as Frederic Bastiat identified the delusional assertion of the Liberal-socialist, ‘Progressive,’ Humanist Democrats.
Theirs is a religion of mysterious insight, referred to by sociologists as verstehen, accessed by their elite 'supermen,' ‘Legislative Leaders,’—their so-called ‘Community Organizers’ through their perversions of sound methods of science and reason, devoid of faith
in God, and is existentialist in nature and hedonistic in essence.
The religious dogma emanating from the invalid assumptions of the highly subjective science of Sociology is nothing less than a modern revival of indefensible Gnostic beliefs. One need only ask the question as to just where Sociology’s supposed enigmatic insight, their purported verstehen, emanates from in order to identify the Gnostic element in the Liberal-socialist’s religious dogma that is constructed upon the invalid assertions of Sociology.
On the other hand, the Christian Conservative would argue that “B. Faith is a knowledge conditioned by holy affection.—
The faith which apprehends God’s being and working is not opinion or imagination. It is certitude with regard to spiritual realities, upon the testimony of our rational nature and upon the testimony of God. Its only peculiarity as a cognitive act of the reason is that it is conditioned by holy affection. As the science of aesthetics is a product of reason as including a power of recognizing beauty practically inseparable from a love for beauty, and as the science of ethics is a product of reason as including a power of recognizing the morally right practically inseparable from a love for the morally right, so the science of theology is a product of reason, but of reason as including a power of recognizing god which is practically inseparable from a love for God.
We here use the term “reason” to signify the minds whole power of knowing. Reason in this sense includes states of the sensibility, so far as they are indispensable to knowledge. We cannot know an orange by the eye alone; to the understanding of it, taste is as necessary as sight. The mathematics of sound cannot give us an understanding of music; we need also a musical ear. Logic alone cannot demonstrate the beauty of a sunset, or of a noble character; love for the beautiful and the right precedes knowledge of the beautiful and the right. Ullman draws attention to the derivation of sapientia, wisdom, from sapere, to taste. So we cannot know God by intellect alone; the heart must go with the intellect to make knowledge of divine things possible. “Human things,” said Pascal, “need only to be known, in order to be loved; but divine things must first
be loved, in order to be known.” “This *religious+ faith of the intellect,” said Kant, “is founded on the assumption of moral tempers.” If one were utterly indifferent to moral laws, the philosopher continues, even then religious truths “would be supported by strong arguments from analogy, but not by such as an obstinate, skeptical heart might overcome.”
Faith, then, is the highest knowledge, because it is the act of the
integral soul, the insight, not of one eye alone, but of the two eyes of the mind, intellect and love to God.With one eye we can see an object as flat, but, if we wish to see around it and get the stereoptic effect, we must use both eyes. It is not the theologian, but the undevout
astronomer, whose science is one-eyed and therefore incomplete. The errors of the rationalist are errors of defective vision. Intellect has been divorced from the heart, that is from a right disposition, right affections, right purpose in life. Intellect says: “I cannot know God”: and intellect is right. What intellect says, the Scriptures also says: 1 Cor. 2: 14—“the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him; and he cannot know them because they are spiritually judged”’ 1 : 21—“in the wisdom of God the world through its wisdom know not God.”
The Scripture on the other hand declares that “by faith we know” (Heb. 11: 3). By “heart” the Scripture means simply the governing
disposition, or the sensibility + the will; and it intimates that the heart is an organ of knowledge: Ex. 35: 25—“the women that were wise hearted”; Ps. 34: 8—“O taste and see that Jehovah is good” –a right taste precedes correct sight: jer.24: 7—“I will give them a heart to know me”; Mat. 5: 8—“Blessed are the pure in heart; for they shall see God”; Luke 24: 25—“slow of heart to believe”; John 7: 17—“If any man willeth to do his will, he shall know of the teaching, whether it is of God, or whether I speak from myself”; Eph. 1: 18—having the eyes of your heart enlightened, that ye may knoweth not God.”
“C. Faith, therefore, can furnish, and only faith can furnish, fit and sufficient material for a scientific theology.–As an operation of man’s
higher rational nature, though distinct from ocular vision or from reasoning, faith is not only a kind, but the highest kind, of knowing. It gives us understanding of realities which to the senses alone are inaccessible, namely, God’s existence, and some at least of the realities between God and his creation.
Phillipi, Glaubenslebre, 1: 50, follows Gerhard in making faith the joint act of intellect and will. Hopkins, Outline Study of Man, 77, 78, speaks not only of “the aesthetic reason” but of “the moral reason.” Murphy, Scientific Bases of Faith, 91, 109, 145, 191—“Faith is the certitude concerning matter in which verification is unattainable.” Emerson, Essays, 2: 96—“Belief consists in accepting the affirmations of the soul—unbelief in rejecting them.” Morell,
Philos. of Religion, 38, 52, 53, quotes Coleridge: “Faith consists in the synthesis of the reasons and of the individual will. And by virtue of the former (that is, reason), faith must be a light, a form of knowing, a beholding of truth.”
Faith, then, is not to be pictured as a blind girl clinging to a cross –faith is not blind—“Else the cross may just as well be a crucifix or an image of Gaudama.” “Blind unbelief,” not blind faith,” is sure to err. And scan his works in vain.” As in conscience we recognize an invisible authority, and know the truth just in proportion to our willingness to “do the truth,” so in religion only holiness can understand holiness, and only love can understand love (cf. John 3: 21—“he that doeth the truth cometh to the light.”).
If a right state of heart be indispensable to faith and so to the knowledge of God, can there be any “theologia irregenitorum,” or theology of the unregenerate? Yes, we answer; just as the blind man can have a science of optics. The testimony of others gives it claims upon him; the dim light penetrating the obscuring membrane corroborates this testimony. The unregenerate man can know God as power and justice, and can fear him. But this is not a knowledge of God’s inmost character; it furnishes some material for a defective and illproportioned theology; but it does not furnish fit or sufficient material for a correct theology. As, in order to make his science of optics satisfactory and complete, the blind man must have the cataract removed from his eyes by some competent oculist, so, in order to any
complete or satisfactory theology; the veil must be taken away from the heart by God himself (cf. 2 Cor. 3: 15,16—“a veil lieth upon their heart, but whosoever it *marg. ‘a man’+ shall turn to the Lord, the veil is taken away”).”
(‘Systematic Theology.’ Pp. 3-5. Augustus Strong, D.D., LL D. President and Professor of Biblical Theology In The Rochester Theological Seminary. Judson Press, Valley Forge, PA. Thirty-First Printing. 1976. ISB No. 0-81700177-8.)
Enigmatic Gnostic insight equates to Sociology’s verstehen and both Sociology’s and the Liberal-socialist Progressive’s assertion of the existence of superior "Master Thinkers" who are embued with superior characteristics of the Liberal-socialist concepts of, as Frederic
Bastiat describes them, ‘Supermen’—their socalled ‘Legislative Leaders,’ or so-called ‘Community Organizers.’
The deification of ‘Science’ and ‘Reason’ by modern sociologists is nothing less than idolatry.
There is a Liberal apostasy taking place in once biblically doctrinally sound Christian Church denominations in America today which has resulted from the spiritual and intellectual blinding of many nominal Christians and contributed to their accommodating the godless, Secular-humanist religion of neoGnostic, "Progressive," Liberal-socialist Democrats. Many of these nominal Christians are to be found within the ranks of the
Republican Party and the Libertarian Party as well. Though they claim to be Christian they embrace unbiblical ideology that is antithetical to the truth in Scripture.
The Liberal, apostate Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)’s agenda, for example, of justifying a
“…new insight…” (‘The Book of Confessions. The
Constitution of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) Published by the Office of the General Assembly. Louisville, KY. Pg.xxxv.), or “…a new and fresh
word from the Lord.” (‘The Book of Confessions.
The Constitution of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) Published by the Office of the General Assembly. Louisville, KY. Pg. xix.), to organizationally embrace
the sin of homosexuality and call their change in stance a biblically defensible CHANGE in the direction of UNITY resembles the effort of early Gnostic cults which called themselves
‘Christian’ but used their demonically inspired aberrant theology to justify licentious behaviour. “Since they believed that
salvation depended solely upon the knowledge of one’s ‘spiritual’ nature, some Gnostics indulged in extremely licentious behaviour.” (‘Eerdmans’ Handbook To The History
Of Christianity.’ John Briggs, Dr. Robert D. Linder, and David Wright. © 1977, Lion Publishing, Berkhamsted, Herts, England. Pg.98.)
“The Gnostics were followers of a variety of religious movements in the early Christian centuries which stressed that people could be saved through a secret knowledge (‘γνώσίς,’ ‘gnossis’ in the Greek.)”
(‘Eerdmans’ Handbook To The History Of Christianity.’ John Briggs, Dr. Robert D. Linder, and David Wright. ©
1977, Lion Publishing, Berkhamsted, Herts, England. Pg.98.)
The ‘secret knowledge’ of the Gnostics equates to the “…great new insight…” (‘The
Book of Confessions. The Constitution of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)’ Published by the Office of the General Assembly. Louisville, KY. Pg. xiii.), and the
“…new and fresh word from the Lord.”,
(‘The Book of Confessions. The Constitution of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)’ Published by the Office of the General Assembly. Louisville, KY. Pg. xix.),
postulated as existant in ‘The Book Of Confessions’ of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) as well as within the concept of Sociology's purported verstehen.
The Liberals have rejected the authority of the Word of God in favor of their own
contemporaneous interpretation based upon the presumption that their so-called "Master Thinker" ‘Supermen’ are supernaturally gifted with some enigmatic 'great new insight' that the rest of we mere mortals do not possess.
“The Gnostic systems which constituted a great danger to Christianity throughout the second century belong within this general climate of religious thought; in another sense, the same might be said of Catholic Christianity as well, though the differences are radical. The Christian (heretical) Gnostics turned Christ into a mythological figure, making him one of the emanations which they conceived as mediators between the supreme God, essentially incapable of contact with the material universe, and the human soul, essentially one with the
divine, but imprisoned in a material body as the consequence of some accident within the divine pleroma.” (‘The Interpreter’s Bible Dictionary. Vol. E-J’
“All the theosophies of these manifold schools may be called “gnostic” in the sense that they teach that knowledge (‘γνώσίς’)—i.e., knowledge of the revealed doctrine of God, World, and Soul—is itself salvation. The materials employed in the construction are drawn from many quarters; they exhibit again the syncretism which characterizes all the religious thought and activity of the period. Oriental elements from various sources— Iranian, Egyptian, Syrian, Babylonian—are inextricably mingled with the Greek substratum of religious thought, which is itself
compounded of Platonic idealism, shamanistic notions of the soul, and some tenets of the Stoic philosophy. Astrology usually enters largely into the mixture. The redemption of the soul is pictured in terms of an ascent through the spheres, guarded as they are by the mighty divinities enthroned in—rather, embodied in— the planets. In a number of the systems—most of them hardly deserve such a namethe planetdivinities are hostile powers who seek to resist the ascent of the soul; the true deity is high above them all, wholly transcendental, invisible, unknowable except insofar as he chooses to make himself known. It is sometimes taught that the soul cannot escape from this material world except through the intervention of a redeemer who descends through the spheres and returns victorious over the planets who control them—“the world
Rulers of this present darkness” (Eph. 6:12).”
(‘The Interpreter’s Bible Dictionary. Vol. E-J.’ Abingdon Press, New York, NY. Copyright 1962. Pg. 499.)
“The later New Testament literature, and at least one of the Apostolic Fathers, strongly combat conceptions of Christ which it is evident must have been widely prevalent, especially in Asia Minor, in the opening years of the second century. These views denied His real humanity and His actual death. He had not come “in the flesh,” but in ghost-like, Docetic appearance. These opinions have sometimes been regarded as the beginnings of Gnosticism. It is true that this Docetic conception of Christ was a feature of much Gnostic teaching. It is more probable, however, that these early teachings were more largely based on an attempt to explain a seeming contradiction between the Jesus of
history and the Christ of faith, than on purely Gnostic speculations. That earthly life of humiliation was so contrasted with His preexistent and post-existent glory, that the simplest solution of the Christological problem may well have seemed to some the denial of the reality of His earthly life altogether. Christ did, indeed, appear. He taught His disciples; but all the time as a heavenly being, not one of flesh and blood.
Gnosticism, properly speaking, was something much more far-reaching. The height of its influence was from about 135 to 160, though it continued a force long after the latter date. It threatened to overwhelm the historic Christian faith, and by so doing brought upon the Christian Church its gravest crisis since the
Pauline battle for freedom from law. Its spread and consequent peril were made possible by the relatively weakly organized, and doctrinally undefined state of the church at its beginning. The church overcame the danger; and in so doing developed a closely knit organization and a clearly defined creed, which contrasted with the more spontaneous and charismatic nature of primitive Christianity.
Gnosticism professed to be based on “knowledge”(‘γνώσίς,’) but not as that word is now commonly understood. Its knowledge was always a mystical, supernatural wisdom, by which the initiates were brought to a true understanding of the universe, and were saved from this evil world of matter. It had a fundamental doctrine of salvation. In these
respects it was akin to the mystery religions. Its most prominent characteristic, however, was its syncretism. It took unto itself many elements from many sources, and assumed many forms. It is, therefore, impossible to speak of a single type of Gnosticism. It was a prevailingly mystical, magical, or philosophical according to the dominant admixture in its syncretism. Gnosticism was pre-Christian in its origin, and was in existence before Christianity came into the world. There were Jewish and heathen types. It is represented in the Hermetic literature of Egypt. It had astral elements which may be traced back to Babylonian religious conceptions, a dualistic view of the universe, Persian in origin, and a doctrine of emanations from God in the “pleroma” or realm of spirit, which was probably Egyptian. Perhaps its most fundamental conception, the wholly evil
character of the phenomenal world, was due to a combination of the Platonic theory of the contrast between the real spiritual sphere of “ideas,” and this visible world of phenomena, interpreted in terms of Persian dualism—the one good and that to which man strives to return, the other wholly bad and the place of his imprisonment. The world of matter is evil. Its creator and ruler is not, therefore, the high, good God, but an inferior and imperfect being, the demiurge. Man, to be saved, must be freed from this bondage to the visible world, and its rulers, the planetary spirits,; and the means of his freedom is “knowledge” (‘γνώσίς’,) a mystical, spiritual enlightenment for the initiated which brings him into communion with the true realm of spiritual realities.
“Strongly syncretistic already, Gnosticism found much in Christianity which it could use. In particular, the figure of Christ was especially adapted to give a definite and concrete center to its theory of a higher saving knowledge. He was the revealer of the hitherto unknown high and all-perfect god to men. By that illumination all “spiritual” men, who were capable of receiving it, would be led back to the realm of the good God. Since the material world is evil, Christ could not have had a real incarnation, and the Gnostics explained His appearance either as Docetic and ghostly, or as a temporary indwelling of the man Jesus, or as an apparent birth from a virgin mother without partaking of material nature. The God of the Old Testament, as the creator of this visible world, cannot be the high God whom Christ revealed, but the inferior demiurge. That all Christians did not
posses the saving “knowledge,” the Gnostics explained by holding it to be a secret teaching imparted by the Apostles to their more intimate disciples, a speaking “wisdom among the perfect” It is true that while Paul was in no sense a Gnostic, there were many things in Paul’s teachings of which Gnostics availed themselves. His sharp contrast between flesh and spirit; his conception of Christ as victor over those “principalities and powers” which are the “world rulers of this darkness,” and his thought of Christ as the Man from Heaven, were all ideas which the Gnostics could employ. Paul was always to them the chief Apostle.” (‘A
History of the Christian Church.’ By Williston Walker. Third Edition. Charles Scribner and Sons. N.Y., N.Y. Copyright 1970. Pp. 52-53.)
“The Gnostic systems which constituted a great danger to Christianity throughout the second century belong within this general climate of religious thought; in another sense, the same might be said of Catholic Christianity as well, though the differences are radical. The Christian (heretical) Gnostics turned Christ into a mythological figure, making him one of the emanations which they conceived as mediators between the supreme God, essentially incapable of contact with the material universe, and the human soul, essentially one with the divine, but imprisoned in a material body as the consequence of some accident within the divine pleroma.” (‘The Interpreter’s Bible Dictionary.
Vol. E-J’ Pg. 499.)
“Gnosticism was divided into many sects and presented a great variety of forms. In all of them the high, good God is the head of the spiritual world of light, often called the “pleroma.” From that world fragments have become imprisoned in this visible world of darkness and evil. In later Gnosticism this fallen element from the pleroma is represented as the lowest of a series of aeons, or spiritual beings, emanating from the high God. To rescue this fallen portion, the seeds of light in the visible world, Christ came, bringing the true “knowledge.” By His teaching those capable of receiving it are restored to the pleroma. They are at best few. Most Gnostics divided mankind into “spiritual,” capable of salvation, and “material” who could not receive the message. Later Gnosticism, especially the school of Valentinus, taught a threefold division,
“spiritual,” who alone could attain “knowledge”; “psychical,” capable of faith, and of a certain degree of salvation; and “material,” who were hopeless.” (‘A History of the Christian
Church.’ By Williston Walker. Third Edition. Charles Scribner and Sons. N.Y., N.Y. Copyright 1970. Pg. 53.)
“Christian tradition represented the founder of Christian Gnosticism to be Simon Magnus, but of his real relations to it little is known. More clearly defined leaders are Satornilus of Antioch, who labored before 150; Basilides, who taught in Alexandria about 130; and, above all, Valentinus, who was active in Rome from about 135 to 165, and who must be regarded as one of the most gifted thinkers of the age.” (‘A History of the Christian Church.’ By
Williston Walker. Third Edition. Charles Scribner and Sons. N.Y., N.Y. Copyright 1970. Pg. 53.)
“While Basilides (130) and Valentines (150), the Gnostics, both quote from the fourth gospel, they do not dispute its genuineness or suggest that it was of recent origin.” (‘Systematic
Theology.’ Augustus Strong. Pg. 160.)
Liberals assert that Christianity developed from Gnostic roots and that the early Christian Church was Gnostic in nature. Nothing could be further from the truth.
“Gnosticism was an immense peril for the church. It cut out the historic foundations of Christianity. Its God is not the God of the Old Testament, which is the work of an inferior or
even evil being. Its Christ had no real incarnation, death, or resurrection. Its salvation is for the few capable of spiritual enlightenment. The peril was the greater because Gnosticism was represented by some of the keenest minds in the church of the second century.” (‘A History of the Christian Church.
Third Edition.’ By Williston Walker. Charles Scribner’s Sons. New York. Copyright 1970. Pp. 51-53.)
"Progressive," Liberal-Socialist ‘Master Thinkers’ and ‘Supermen’:
In the article ‘Developing as Rational
Persons: Viewing Our Development in Stages’ (1996. By Elder, L. with Paul, R.
www.criticalthinking.org), the authors describe ‘The
Inner Logic of their purported liberal "Progressive" “Master Thinker” as an inner logic wherein, “Having formed their identities
in terms of reasonability, not in terms of any particular belief or belief system, they are able to shift beliefs without trauma or selfdoubt.”
This statement epitomizes the promotion by Sociologists of the highly syncretistic nature espoused and promoted as truth within Sociology’s espoused Liberal-socialist philosophical ideology upon which the Liberalsocialist’s delusional worldview is constructed and Sociology’s refutation of absolute Truth embodied in the person of the risen Lord Jesus
of the Bible, the Creator from whom all men are endowed with certain unalienable rights, in favor of a delusional sliding-scale continuum of Moral Relativism wherein the religion of Liberalism’s ‘Master Thinkers’ determine for the rest of society what is good and what is evil, what is right and what is wrong, what shall be legal, and what shall be illegal. They presume to know good from evil and reject the Creator.
Sociologists postulate that a person who is able to ‘shift beliefs’ is superior to one firmly established in their faith in Christ Jesus!
In the sub-heading within the article “We
Reach the Fifth Stage When We Have Established Good Habits of Thought Across the Domains of Our Lives” is introduced the stage the author calls “the Advanced Thinker stage.”
The authors proceed to equate the adoption of their suggestions for rational thinking and the embracing of their philosophical ideology underlying the development they assert is necessary in a person’s proper thinking—that is to say realigning one’s own values with theirs—with achieving a state of “…rational living….” suggesting that we shall then find “…that it is no longer a strain to aspire to reasonability.”
implying that any individual’s systematic approach to thinking rationally prior to embracing the author’s suggestions for developing one’s cognitive processes was necessarily previous to embracing their state of so-called ‘rational living’ unreasonable!
In the same manner of disingenuously setting up a straw man assertion as fact then knocking it down, the authors maintain that in achieving stage five, the “Advanced Thinker” stage, “…no longer…” finds “…it difficult to admit when…” they “…are wrong….” presupposing that a proselyte of their assertions, before having embraced them as a prescribed replacement truth, found it difficult to admit when he or she was wrong!
The authors propose that at stage five “We
now have deep insight…” , (i.e. ‘gnosis’ or as
sociologists would identify it, verstehen,), “…into the fact that our development…”, (that is to say increasing adoption of a pluralistic, morally relative philosophical ideology as a new value system based on a neo-Gnostic enigmatic insight known by Sociology’s terminology of verstehen), “…is directly dependent on the extent to which we are successful at decreasing the role of egocentric thinking in our daily lives.” Again, the Sociologist authors presumptuously condemn any who reason counter to their prescribed manner as “egocentric.’
The authors assertions are nothing less than a belief in one’s own superiority as a member of a “Master Thinker” race, or shall we simplify the belief with a familiar phraseology and say a member of the Master Race! It is codified Malignant Narcissim!
The assertion that people necessarily think egocentrically before adopting the proposed ideology is preposterous and antithetical to the reality that those in Christ Jesus think 'Christocentrically,' that is to say we in Christ Jesus pray according to the teachings of the Bible that we ourselves diminish and Christ Jesus increase in
every aspect of our being. Such an attitude is a fundamental tenet of Christian discipleship.
The authors maintain that “At the advanced stage,…“ one is “…now skilled at monitoring the role in thinking in concepts, assumptions, inferences, implications, points of view, questions purposes, and information.”
This statement pre-supposes that said adherents to the author's Liberal-socialist religious beliefs codified in the subjective science of Sociology concerning the rational development of thinking are morally qualified to monitor their own roles in thinking concepts, assumptions, inferences, et cetera, etc..., but without recognition of a Moral Lawgiver the proponents of this nonsensical "Master
Thinker" argument would extend to each and every would-be 'Master Thinker' the authority to determine just what is or is not moral—to know themselves just what is or is not good or evil. The Sociologists who embrace this school of thought literally advance the second part of Satan’s abominable lie—that Man could ‘be as gods, knowing good and evil.’
Interesting that in introducing stage six, the “Master Thinker” stage, the authors describe the current era as “this age of irrationality.”
In all recorded human history no other era can be held-up as any more or less rational than the present. Certainly, historical examples of rational behavior and irrational behavior may be argued from any chapter in human history, but to imply that there exists over any specific ‘age,’ or chapter in human history, a ubiquitous spirit of irrationality more or less prevelant than in any other is nothing less than a nonsensical, delusional historical revisionism.
The author proceeds to describe the “Master Thinker” stage as a useful concept
“…, for it sets out what we are striving for…” presupposing that the
reader has thus far bought into the erroneous ideology and faulty arguments in support of the Liberal-socialist worldview underlying their confidence in the proposed stages of development as reality and has already decided to join in and strive for whatever it is that the author is striving for. Absolute nonsense!
By the way, I received this article on ‘Master Thinkers’ in a class while attending a community college in Louisiana in 2012. This is the religious belief system being taught to your children in Liberal colleges across America.
The authors lengthily describe their construct of a “Master Thinker”: “Master thinkers have not only a high degree of knowledge of thinking, but a high degree of practical insight as well.”
“Master thinkers have deep insights into the systematic internalization of critical thinking into their habits.” “Their knowledge of the
qualities of their thinking is outstanding.”
Apparently everyone had all better label themselves as ‘Master Thinkers’ before they are relegated to a classification of a lower level of ‘Thinkers!’
The authors elaborate on the list of qualities of their purported ‘Master Thinker’ in a numbered list with headings which read: “… 1) conscious of the ‘workings’ of their minds; 2) highly integrated; 3) powerful; 4) logical; 5) far-sighted; 6) deep; 7) self-correcting; and 8) emancipated.”, but their insupportable assertions listed, when reflected upon and subjected to critical analysis, are ridiculous fabrications of their imagination at best.
Let the reader beware of the dangerous nature of this type of ideology.
The authors presume that their construct of idealized “Master Thinkers” would “…achieve a high level of success in bringing their thoughts, emotions, and actions in line with their espoused ideals, …” and that it would follow that, because of said congruency, “…they would function with a high level of fulfillment and sense of well-being.”
One might argue that, were the ideals espoused by said 'Master Thinkers' or 'Supermen' to be erroneous, then the congruency to said error would likewise manifest itself in the thought, emotions, and actions of the ‘Thinkers’ and prove them not
masters at all but slaves for it is written “He who sins is a slave to sin.”
That being the case it is unlikely that erroneous ideals embraced by said purportedly ‘Master Thinkers’ which enslave would result in any “…high level of fulfillment and sense of well-being.” for “…the wages of sin is death.”
"Let Us Now Try Liberty
God has given to men all that is necessary for them to accomplish their destinies. He has provided a social form as well as a human form. And these social organs of persons are so constituted that they will develop themselves harmoniously in the clean air of liberty. Away, then with quacks and organizers! Away with their rings, chains, hooks, and pincers! Away with their artificial systems! Away with the whims of governmental administrators, their socialized projects, their centralization, their tariffs, their government schools, their state religions, their free credit, their bank monopolies, their regulations, their restrictions, their equalization by taxation, and their pious moralizations!
And now that the legislators and dogooders have so futilely inflicted so many systems upon society, may they finally end where they should have begun: May they reject all systems, and try liberty: for
liberty is an acknowledgement of faith in God and His works." (‘The Law.’ Pg. 76.)
The neo-Gnostic, "Progressive," Liberalsocialist, Secular-humanist or theistically Humanist Democrat’s rejection and condemnation of 'faith in God and His works’ and replacement of God, from Whom ‘We the People’ are endowed, along with all Mankind, the Creator, with certain inalienable rights, with their ludicrous Big Bang Theory of creation, (Just where did the supposed material that
went ‘Bang!’ come from?), and insupportable Darwinian theories of “Evolution.” In rejecting the Creator recognized in America’s founding documents, her organic law, is a direct threat to the preservation of the liberty that is recognized as originating as an endowment by the Creator of the Universe, the risen Lord Jesus of the Bible. ‘liberty
is an acknowledgement of faith in God and His works.’
Efforts persist by neo-Gnostic, “Progressive,” Liberal-socialist Democrats and Secular-humanists to delete the word ‘Creator’ from the Constitution.
Mr. Barry Soetoro, a.k.a. Mr. Barack Hussein Obama, the fraud currently illegally occupying the Oval Office, is on record as having deleted the word ‘Creator’ from quotations he has made from the Declaration of Independence since illegally occupying the office of the presidency while fraudulently representing himself as constitutionally eligible to be president no less than seven times.
“Because this is an age of religious pluralism and syncretism (that is, a diluting of truth for the sake of unity), Christ’s lordship is deemed irrelevant by many religious groups that believe one religion is as good as another. His
preeminence is denied by others that place the Christian stamp upon a fusion of beliefs from several religions. Usually hailed as an advance beyond apostolic Christianity, this blend promises self-fulfillment and freedom without surrender to Christ.” (‘The Spirit Filled Bible.
Personal Study Bible Unveiling God’s Fullness In All God’s Word.’ New King James Version. Thomas Neal, Inc. Nashville, Tennessee. Copyright 1983. ‘Personal Application’ Pg. 1811.)
“‘Pluralism is inadmissible whenever it is at variance with what God has revealed in His Word.19.’” “It is quite obvious that fragments of truth are to be found in the prophetic repositories of pluralism. Those whom the apostle called to account for preaching ‘another gospel’ are not said to completely lack truth. But their message is adulterated and laced with
errors, violating the essential criterion of the Word concerning the glorious person and allsufficiency of the finished redemption of Christ (1 Timothy 3:16; 1 John 2: 1,2), The false gospels of non-Christian religions, in fact, frequently add doctrines that are as dangerous as what they omit and may well turn the hearer’s hearts against Christian truth. ‘The challenge of pluralism, therefore, is not to compound this mixture of truth with untruth in the gospels of pluralism but to displace the perverted gospel of the world with the pure gospel revealed from heaven by the Spirit of God in the Person of Christ.’20.” (‘Demons In the
World Today. A Study of Occultism in the Light of
God’s Word.’ By Merrill F. Unger. Th. D., Ph. D.,
Copyright 1971. Ch. 8. Pp. 158-159.)
“People who feel that all religions are good and who are unable to ‘discern spirits’ (1 Corinthians 12:10) are ready prospects for demonic deception.” (‘Demons in the World Today.
A Study of Occultism in the Light of God's Word.’ By Merrill F. Unger. Th. D., Ph. D. copyright 1971. Pg.155.)
Sound Biblical Doctrine:
"The danger of delusion increases in these last days as demonic activity accelerates and serious study of God’s Word wanes. It is a patent fact that sound Bible teaching often is lacking in circles that highlight miracles and healings and gifts of the Spirit. Sometimes the so-called ‘distinctive truths’ are mere doctrinal hobbies and perversions of the Word of God. When these focus on anything other than Jesus Christ and the full scriptural revelation,
counterfeit powers of demons may infiltrate lives.
This warning is desperately needed by God’s born-again people (1 John 4:1). Present-day Christians must recognize that the Bible, rightly understood and implicitly obeyed, is the only sure protection against demonic delusion and despoilment. Evil powers can accomplish their deceptions only when the Word of God is ignored or disdained – and many Christians are susceptible to demonic influence today because they have ignored God’s revelation in his Word. The Bible is impregnable armor for the Christian—when he lives in it!” (‘Demons in the
World Today. A Study of Occultism in the Light of God's Word.’ By: Merrill F. Unger. Th. D., Ph. D. copyright 1971. Ch.7; Pg. 134-135.)
“Although some people regard the pursuit of doctrinal accuracy as an unspiritual intellectualism, sound doctrine is actually very important to sound spirituality. Christian doctrine teaches us about God, His purposes and will for our lives, what we are like spiritually apart from God’s grace, how God’s grace changes us; in short, everything we need to know in order to pursue true spirituality (Rom. 6:17-18; 1 Tim. 1:5, 10; 2 Tim. 3:16-17). Doctrine provides external, objective controls for our inward, subjective experiences so that we may discern genuine spirituality from fraudulent, artificial, or even demonic spirituality (Col. 2:22-23; 1 John 4:1-3).
In pursuing an accurate understanding of Christian doctrine, we are fulfilling one aspect of God’s greatest commandment – that we love God with all our minds (Matt. 22:37). This commandment surely implies that we should take great care and make every effort to conform our beliefs and convictions to the truth (cf. Rom. 12:2)—and this means doctrine.”
(Bowman, Robert M., Jr. “A Biblical Guide To Orthodoxy and Heresy (Part One: The Case For Doctrinal Discernment).” Christian Research Institute Statement DO080. March, 2009.)
“The Bible clearly teaches that the end times will be characterized by a strong spiritual delusion that blinds many from the true gospel and also leads those who have believed into apostasy.” (‘Another Jesus: The Ecumenical Christ and
the New Evangelization.’ By Roger Oakland with Jim Tetlow.Copyright 2004. Pg. 12.)
"We are living in days when Satan is pouring out his spirits as well as Jesus Christ the Holy Spirit. In the Revelation, the activities of evil spirits are foretold as part of the total conflict of
the Church with the powers of darkness. In Chapter 9 there is a terrifying vision of the shaft of the bottomless pit being opened to release "locusts" that swarm over the earth, deceiving and destroying. But most of the world does not repent, but continues to worship demons (verse 20). Later in the same book there is a vision of the dragon, the beast and the false prophet, and from each of their mouths there comes, "foul spirits like frogs, for they are demonic spirits, performing signs..." (16: 13). Yet again, we discover that the other powerful agency of evil in the Revelation, Babylon, is under the same influence. We are told that this symbol of affluence "has become a dwelling place for demons, a haunt of every foul spirit..." (18: 2).
As we draw nearer to Christ's return there is no indication of a lessening of this power. The idea that evil spirits only operate in "uncivilised" parts of the world is entirely illusory. It may be true that at some points in history the power of a Church which believed in both the existence of such evil powers and the authority it possessed in Christ's name to overcome them, had removed most of this power from its borders or driven it underground and so neutralised its effectiveness. But such a situation does not exist today, for the Church has largely abdicated its authority and blandly disbelieves in such things. The enemy has come in like a flood, and few have resisted it. Merrill F. Unger has written: 5
Although demonic activity in human history has always been undeniably great since the sin of our first parents exposed mankind to its baneful attacks, yet the full realization and augmentation of its destructive power are reserved for the consummation of the age. Demonism bears a striking relation to the doctrine of the last thing; and all classes of mankind. Jew, Gentile and the Church of God (1 Cor. 10: 32) will be intimately and vitally affected by the last-day upsurge of evil supernaturalism." (‘Spiritual Warfare.’ By Micheal
Harper. Copyright 1970. U.S.A. ISBA 0-912106-69-7. Pp.40-41.)
“One of the most subtle roles of demons is the perverting of revealed truth. They never cease in their endeavor to turn men away from the gospel of Christ and to deny and distort the
Word of God. Their activity started when Satan used a threefold strategy of opposition to God (Isaiah 14: 12-14), confirmed falsehood (Genesis 3:4), and slander of the divine goodness (Genesis 3:5; cf. John 8:44). Down through the centuries Satan and his host of demon helpers, who make his presence and power practically ubiquitous, have used the same strategy to tempt men.
When man succumbed to Satan’s blandishments, he lost his Edenic innocence and his fellowship with God (Genesis 3:8) and fell under the control of evil spiritual powers, who encourage fallen man to rebel against God’s Word and will. As God began to work in redemption (Genesis 3:9-15; 21; cf. John 5:17; 9:4; 17:4), Satan’s spiritual hosts waged a
persistent and endless counter-campaign to keep man ignorant of divinely revealed truth and redemptive grace in Christ. Satanic strategy always aims to deceive men to the greatest degree possible.
If ‘the god of this world’ cannot totally blind the unbeliever’s mind and thus completely hide the gospel from him (2 Corinthians 4:4), he will seduce the believer to the best of his ability. To keep the believer from the simplicity and purity of the gospel and grace he will encourage all sorts of errors. This is Satan’s attempt to retain some degree of control over those who come to a saving knowledge of Christ. Doctrinal error obscures revelation and gives Satan and demonic forces a toehold. Evil powers can confuse man in his attempt to interpret truth,
but they cannot penetrate the sure defense of God’s infallible Word. The Holy Bible, God’s revealed Word, points us to Christ’s victory over Satan at the cross. He alone can deliver us from evil and from the evil one.” (‘Demons In The World
Today. A Study of Occultism in the Light of God's Word.’ By: Merrill F. Unger. Th. D., Ph. D., copyright 1971. Ch. 8; Pg.147-148.)
Doctrinal error can lead otherwise honorable men into embracing evil practices: In the book "Reading The Man: A Portrait of Robert E. Lee Through His Private Letters" written by Elizabeth Brown Pryor she writes,
"He held that although slavery was regrettable, it was an institution sanctioned by God and as such would disappear only when God ordained it."
(Smithsonian. Oct. 2009. Pg.68, Article: Day of Reckoning. By Fergus M. Bordewich.)
Such is the degree to which a Christian man as well as the society in which he lived may be misled by false doctrine into justifying something as hideously evil as slavery—even into supporting today's de facto slavery on the metaphorical “Progressive” plantation of the Liberal-socialist Democrat Party that is ever more closely espoused by the elitist faction leadership within the once Conservative Republican Party.
It was doctrinal error that crept into the American Christian Church and manifested itself in the faulty arguments used by those who would financially gain from legalized slavery that permitted the legalization of such an horrific practice, and likewise today it is
faulty doctrines—doctrines of demons— promulgated by the Liberal-socialist ‘Progressives’ on the Left of the political spectrum within both the Democrat and Republican political parties that is permitting the intrusive, unconstitutional ‘Big Government’ policies to enslave Americans upon a metaphorical “Progressive” plantation disguised as governmental welfare.
Harriet Tubman, “(born Araminta Harriet Ross;
1820—March 10, 1913), was an African-American abolitionist, humanitarian, and Union spy during the American Civil War. Born into slavery, Tubman escaped and subsequently made more than thirteen missions to rescue more than 70 slaves using the network of antislavery activists and safe houses known as the Underground Railroad. She later helped John Brown recruit men for his raid on Harpers Ferry, and in the post-war era struggled for women's suffrage,” (Wikipedia.org), said,
“I freed a thousand slaves. I could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves.” (africanamericanquotes.org.)
In the Liberal-socialist “Progressive’s” assertions that the biblical texts evolved from non-existent documents written by enigmatically gifted authors within a ‘Creative Community’ that they substitute for the early Church when regarding the compilation of the Bible, Liberal ‘theologians’ ask rhetorically if God has indeed said what He has said in the literary voice of His Word, the Bible, in a manner no different essentially than the serpent in the Garden attempted to ask in his deceptive questions to Eve wherein he suggested that God had not said what He had said to Adam and Eve: “Has God indeed said, ‘You shall not eat of every tree of the garden’?” (Genesis 3:1.)
Then Liberal-socialist so-called ‘theologians’ go about attempting to prove by way of their indefensible, faulty methods of textual criticism that God really did NOT indeed say, or convey in His Word, precisely what is in fact written in Holy Scripture—what God has in fact said in a literary voice to Man.
Pay close attention to what the Serpent did in framing his deceptively misleading questions. He not only questioned whether or not God had actually said something—he twisted the actual command God had in fact given for God had not commanded that Man not eat “…of every tree of the garden…,’ but only not to eat of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.
Likewise, the Liberal-socialist so-called ‘theologians’ pervert the Word of God and maintain that It conveys things that It does not. Even worse, when the Word of God does not say what they want it to say they re-write it to say what they want it to say or perform illegitimate literary textual criticism gymnastics to arrive at a re-interpretation of the Text that will mean what it is they want it to mean.
"It is a standard tactic to take someone's proposal, misstate it and then disagree with it. It's very effective. I've used it myself."—Teddy Kennedy at the National
Press Club, 2002
Liberal "theologians" insert into their contrived developmental theories, which they assert are a reality surrounding the compilation of the texts assembled into the Bible Man's motives behind the authorship of the texts— authorship not of God they say, but of Man— within, as they say, Man’s contemporaneous Sitz im Leben and motivated by a contemporaneous Zeitgeist, the contemporaneous spirit of any given age, at the time of the writing of any document in question. Then the Liberal ‘theologians’ assert as reality in any situational construct they wish to posit as having been the actual reality of the situation for any past “Creative Community”— to dream up—as an alternative reality anything that they wish to dream up as the past reality of the situation in order to justify in their own darkened and delusional minds any re-
interpretation they desire intheir own heart to make of any biblical Text in question.
The Liberal ‘theologians’ redefine any past or present cultural setting as they wish to redefine it in order to argue why a certain interpretation was acceptable or not in the past and should or should not be considered right or wrong, good or evil, in the present. They are insisting that they now good from evil. Sound familiar?
The Liberal’s so-called “reasoning” is the very definition of moral relativity and licentiousness! Liberal so-called “theologians” are free within their delusional constructs they choose to regard as reality to fabricate any future alternative definition of reality,
otherwise known as a delusion, they so choose to describe any historical and/or contemporaneous cultural circumstances in order to justify in their own minds and to the masses of ‘less enlightened,’ ‘non-Bright’ individuals within a culture any reinterpretation of the biblical Texts they wish to posit as fact in order to extend license to themselves to behave howsoever they choose. Liberalism is delusional—it is madness.
Liberalism’s so-called ‘COMMUNITY’ Construct:
Liberal “theologians” simply concoct an undefinable composite “Community” howsoever they wish to define it at any given moment in time past or present in order to facilitate their delusional construction of an
alternate reality to suit their delusional reinterpretation of Scripture in order to justify in their own hearts and darkened minds their neo-Gnostic, Liberal-socialist, Marxist, Humanist and/or Secular Humanist, ‘Progressive,’ and ultimately at its root satanic agenda.
Thomas Sowell describes ‘Mystical references to ‘society, that the author of this treatment would equate with the Liberal’s mystical references to their conveniently manipulable defininition of whatever it is that they want their so-called ‘Community’ to mean at any given place and time. Christian Conservatives must
realize that the viewpoint of those who hold certain truths as self-evident, for example the truth that ‘all men are created equal and endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights,’ are rejected presupossitionally as illegitimate by the Liberal ‘Progressive,’ Marxist, Secular-humanist Democrats. They demean the Christian Conservative position inscribed within our country’s founding documents.
Christian Conservatives have surrendered any attempt at refuting the contention of the Liberal-socialist’s that there exists what the Liberals unceasingly describe as the “Community,” their re-defining of the members within a society as a single homogenous body. The Liberal’s will never specifically define their revisionist definition of their composite “Community” because it is a delusional substitute for the historical recognition of America’s citizenry as ‘One Nation Under God,’
the only homogenous unity worthy of aspiring to as a nation.
The religion of Liberalism, or ‘Progressivism’ is seeking to replace the Creator from whom all men have been endowed with certain unalienable rights, the risen Lord Jesus of the Bible, as the God of our nation.
The Liberal “theologians” maintain that Man, or certain elite men to be more specific, Sociologically defined as "Master Thinkers," or as Bastiat facetiously called them ‘Supermen’ and “Legislative Leaders,” who are described by Liberal-socialist apologists today as “Brights,” have a supernatural gift for knowing good from evil, right from wrong.
The “Bright” meme has been formulated by Liberals to describe their supposedly gnostically enlightened, therefore intellectually “Bright,” with an enigmatic and mystical ‘greater new insight’ that makes their decsion making ability regarding questions of morality—the good nature or evil nature of any issue in question— superior than the rest of the general, not-so“Bright” members of society.
“meme (n.) 1976, introduced by evolutionary
biologist Richard Dawkins in "The Selfish Gene," coined by him from Greek sources, e.g. mimeisthai "to imitate" (see mime), and intended to echo “gene.” We need a name for the new replicator, a noun that conveys the idea of a unit of cultural transmission, or a unit of imitation. 'Mimeme' comes from a suitable Greek root, but I want a monosyllable that sounds a bit like 'gene'. I hope my classicist friends will forgive me if I abbreviate mimeme to meme. If it is any consolation, it could alternatively be thought of as being related to 'memory', or to the French word même. It should be pronounced to rhyme with 'cream'. [Richard Dawkins, "The Selfish Gene," 1976]” (etymonline.com.)
The Liberal “Bright” meme used to describe their self-appointed so-called “Bright” ‘Master Thinkers’ who are professed to be endowed with superior mental and spiritual capacities originating from what source they do not say
and supposedly gifted from ‘an Higher Power,’ perhaps the Zeitgeist, with a Sociologically described “Verstehen,” (an higher knowledge, a ‘superman-like’ enigmatic insight, a mystical “Bright-ness,” i.e. ‘γνώσίς,’ (gnosis).) in reality is reflective of the true origin of the foundational beliefs of Liberalism’s religious dogma—its unbiblical doctrines and tenets: The one time ever so bright angel of Light himself who’s name was Lucifer, but is now Satan.
These men who have embraced the second part of Satan’s original lie as truth and believe that they are superior beings—who believe that they can ‘be as gods,’ (“For God doth know, that in the day ye eat of it, then your eyes shall be opened: and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.” (Gen. 3:5, Webster’s Bible
Translation)), and direct the re-writing of the Bible according to the Liberal “theologian’s undefinable construct of their so-called “Community’s” situational needs—based upon any given and conveniently redefined Sitz im Leben, and inspired by any given Zeitgeist they wish to define for themselves as dominant at any given time and place—just as those contemporaneous with the original writing of the biblical Texts supposed counterparts would purportedly have done in their own ‘Creative Community,’ or so they presume, when the respective autographical biblical Texts were first penned or dictated.
Liberal “theologians” maintain that situational demands, Sitz im Leben, of any given “Creative Community” they wish to proclaim as
a reality justify the re-interpretation of and rewriting of Scripture by the elitist “Brights” within said “Community” to suit said “Community’s” needs. They use circular reasoning to justify their manipulation of Scripture and formulation of unbiblical doctrinal postions.
Adherents to the religion of Liberalism, or ‘Progressivism,’ or Humanism, or Secular Humanism, who regard themselves as Socialists, Marxists, Communists, or Democrat ‘Community Organizers’ shift every issue onto the delusional playingfield of being discussed within the confines of their delusional definition of a Community and in doing so achieve at the onset of any discussion of any issue so relocated an Hegelian synthesis with
their covertly posited thesis—that there is such a unified “Community”—that is to say that all the citizens in any expanse of territory that they wish to define as ‘the community’ do in fact concede to the arguments postulated by the self-appointed ‘Community Organizers’ regarding the direction that the so-called ‘Community’ should take regarding any issue of political contention in question.
Liberal ‘theologians’ and Liberal politicians maintain that since the Sitz im Leben of their preferred definition of any given so-called ‘Community’ changes—or “evolves”—over time, then the meaning of the Text of the Bible also changes over time—and the meaning of the text of the Constitution of the United States of America changes over time—and that the
“Creative Community”—just as in the case of the 2nd Century “Creative Community” responsible for the New Testament Texts of the Bible according to them, or earlier ‘Creative Communities’ among the Jews responsible for writing the Old Testament Source Documents— has the right and duty—the authority—to reinterpret the Word of God to mean whatsoever it wishes for the Word to mean at any given time and place.
The religion of Liberal-socialism, or Humanism, or ‘Progressivism, or Marxism, or Liberalism and those claimed by adherents to the religion as elevated above the rest of humanity with a sociologically defined verstehen—those purportedly gifted by the ‘spirit of the Age,’ or Zeitgeist, with an
enigmatic Gnostic intellectual and spiritual superior illumination that makes them “Bright”—‘Community Organizers,’ ‘Master Thinkers,’ or ‘Supermen’ as Bastiat faceciously termed them, have the same innate authority and duty to
save the rest of Mankind from themelves and to
re-write the laws of our nation according to their perverted assertion of the needs of today’s so-called ‘Community,’ inspired by whatever it is they choose to define as the contemporary Zeitgeist, or ‘spirit of the Age.’
Their’s is not a new concept. Hitler's infamous Shutzstaffel, interpreted into English
"Protective Squadron,’ more commonly
known as the S.S., asserted the same
patronizing attitude that its aims were to save the rest of Mankind from themselves.
Liberal “theology” is the height of arrogance and pride. It is morally relative and licentious in nature. It is an attempt by men to vaunt their authority over God’s authority and to illegitimately justify the usurpation of political authority by its purported superiorly endowed elite ‘Master Thinkers.’ The religion of Liberalism is totalitarian in nature.
The arguments of the Liberal so-called "theologians" for an evolving corpus of biblical text source documents derived from their
preposterous assertion that there exist J/E/P/D designated source documents are a complete fabrication—manipulative conjecture—lies. The arguments are indefensible. There are no such source documents—not a single shred of evidence for one.
The Radical Historical-critical schools of Liberal, 'Progressive,' textual criticism that embrace as foundational the evolutionary Graff-Wellhausen Documentary Hypothesis which postulates a developmental evolution of the biblical Texts involving a myriad of postulated ,yet non-existent, source documents, primarily the J/E/P/D documents, and maintain that the content of those nonexistent source documents as well as the Bible, which they maintain is a ongoing ‘Living and Breathing Document’ in the sense that it is— according to the Radical Historical-critical schools of textual criticism—evolving and manipulably evolvable, that is to say editable, did emanate from the needs of the contemporaneous “Creative Community” and more specifically from those within said postulation of a “Community” gifted with
Sociology’s verstehen, that is nothing less than an assertion of a neo-gnostic enigmatic insight or spiritual/intellectual illumination superior to others within their construct of an “Inclusive” “Community” that stands in contrast to the Body of Christ, the Bride of Christ, God’s true Church militant, and is in fact nothing less than a satanic counterfeit of the Body of Christ.
Embracing the Liberal-socialist, “Progressive,” Secular-humanist, Humanist, or Marxist worldview’s concept of a counterfeit to the Body of Christ Jesus here on earth “ that has been adopted by the Radical Historicalcritical schools of textual criticism as what the Form critics describe as a “Creative
Community,” the Liberal “theologians” delusionally assert that they themselves are the elite, ‘Bright,’ gnostically endowed with a superior spiritual/intellectual “illumination,” ‘Master Thinkers’ with the right and even the duty to re-interpret Scripture as the situation dictates—their manipulable definition of the Sitz im Leben—guided by the prevailing Zeitgeist.
Liberal politicians do the same thing when they assert that they, the “Community’s” “Organizers,” mysteriously gifted with some elevated verstehen—Gnostic insight—into what it is that society, though they would surely use the words “Community”—needs and wants. Then the ‘Legislative Leaders,’ as Frederic Bastiat termed them, proceed to tell the rest of
society what it is that it needs and wants—then they proceed to legislate that what it is that they have decided upon is precisely what society gets, whether or not it is what ‘We the People’ want.
Those who are convinced that they themselves are the gnostically illuminated— that is to say ‘Bright’—‘Supermen’ and ‘Legislative Leaders,’ as Bastiat termed them, and deserving of an elevated status within the Liberal-socialist construct of their so-called “Community,” the self-proclaimed “Community Organizers,” or as Dr. Alan Keyes at loyaltoliberty.com addresses them, “the elitist faction,” uniformly exhibit overt traits of the psychological disorder known as Malignant
Tragically ironic is the fact that the selfdeluded Liberal elite are not supernaturally enlightened—not “Bright” at all—but have had their minds darkened by the god of this world:
“In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.” (2 Corinthians
The Liberal’s so-called “Community,” a counterfeit corpus to the Body of Christ, is a
compilation of many disparate groups— homosexuals, abortionists, Democrats, Republicans, illegal immigrants, and sadly many who consider themselves to be Christian with whom Bible believing Christians cannot spiritually unite.
Congruent with Satan’s suggestion in the Garden that Man could ‘be as gods,’ Liberalsocialist, ‘Progressive,’ neo-Gnostic Humanists, utilizing the doctrines and tenets of their religious belief system codified in Sociology, worship their god—Mankind, Humanity, so, most appropriately, their religion is rightly identified as "Humanism." Though Humanist, Liberal-socialist, ‘Progressives’ may strive to argue that their belief system is secular in nature, hence the adoption of the label
“Secular-humanism,” truth be told the belief system of those who consider themselves Secular-humanists is nothing less than a religion with its own dogmatic religious doctrines and tenets.
But Liberals don't like to permit their terms and concepts to be nailed down and illuminated for the absurd assertions that they are, so like a piece of Jello, they continually redefine, re-label, re-brand the concepts within their religious belief system one may describe rightly as the religion of Liberalism, or ‘Progressivism,’ or Marxism, or Humanism or use German terms like ‘Zeitgeist,’ ‘Sitz im Leben,’ and ‘Vertehen,’ to camouflage their ridiculous postulations.
“Although some people regard the pursuit of doctrinal accuracy as an unspiritual intellectualism, sound doctrine is actually very important to sound spirituality. Christian doctrine teaches us about God, His purposes and will for our lives, what we are like spiritually apart from God’s grace, how God’s grace changes us; in short, everything we need to know in order to pursue true spirituality (Rom. 6:17-18; 1 Tim. 1:5, 10; 2 Tim. 3:16-17). Doctrine provides external, objective controls for our inward, subjective experiences so that we may discern genuine spirituality from fraudulent, artificial, or even demonic spirituality (Col. 2:22-23; 1 John 4:1-3).
In pursuing an accurate understanding of Christian doctrine, we are fulfilling one aspect
of God’s greatest commandment – that we love God with all our minds (Matt. 22:37). This commandment surely implies that we should take great care and make every effort to conform our beliefs and convictions to the truth (cf. Rom. 12:2) – and this means doctrine.”
(Bowman, Robert M., Jr. “A Biblical Guide To Orthodoxy and Heresy (Part One: The Case For Doctrinal Discernment).” Christian Research Institute Statement DO080. Originally published in the Christian Research Journal.)
The Liberals composite “Community” is spiritually dead. As a counterfeit substitute for the Body of Christ, His true Church militant, the Liberal’s contention of a “Community” is figuratively speaking well represented by the famous monster in Mary Shelly’s work ‘Frankenstein.’
Composed of a multitude of disparate, spiritually dead fragments of society into—so they assert—a single, homogenous, unified, “Community,” the Liberals concept of “Community” mirrors the Frankenstein monster because without the spirit of the Lord endwelling said body it is lifeless though those suffering from delusions symptomatic of the mental disorder characteristic of Liberalism’s adherents may scream ecstatically ‘It’s
alive! It’s alive!’ all night and day.
Though neither of the above graphic images employing satiracle usage of Mary Shelly’s Dr. Frankenstein character’s monster utilizes their depictions to portray my contention that the Liberal’s construct of their so-called “Community” is a spiritually dead satanic counterfeit of the Body of Christ composed of many disparate parts—much like the monster in the story—it is most ironic that it should have been adopted by two artists in an effort to convey a truthful message and that, in the second drawing the character became appropriately employed to convey a message regarding the Liberal-socialists would be messiah, the personification of Malignant Narcissim, Mr. Barack ‘King Hussein’ Obama, Jr., a.k.a. Barry Soetoro, a.k.a. Soebarkah.
Such a proposition that a Zeitgeist or “Spirit of the Age” might justifiably inspire the reinterpretation, even rewriting of Scripture is heretical. It is an invocation for the embracing of the spirit of the antichrist—another Jesus— in place of the faith conveyed in the Gospel which was ‘once delivered unto the saints.’ The ‘spirit of the Age’ espoused by Liberal-socialist Progressives cannot bring their monstrous counterfeit to the Body of Christ, their“Community,” to life.
“…where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is Liberty.” 2 Corinthians 3:17. Where the Spirit of the Lord is NOT, there is slavery, STUPID!
“Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.”—Jude 1:3. King
James Bible "Authorized Version", Cambridge Edition.
Liberalism epitomizes hypocrisy.Make no mistake about it—the philosophical arguments underlying all the ‘birds of a feather’ within the Liberal schools of literary textual criticism which uniformly embrace the Radical Historicalcritical schools of literary textual criticism’s Graff-Wellhausen Documentary Hypothesis and its assertion of source documents—though non-existent—from which the Bible was compiled by certain gnostically gifted men who were driven on by a contemporaneous Zeitgeist and by whatever they themselves decided that they knew was good or evil, right or wrong, are religiously dogmatic in nature.
Like a malignant cancer in the Body of Christ, Liberal ‘theologians’ who have infiltrated Christ’s true Church militant presumptuously
decide what the contemporary “Community”— Liberal ‘theologians’ attempt to use the same over inclusive nonsense of their ‘Community’ construct to define outside the parameters of a biblical definition a more Inclusive definition of the Christian Church—needs to tolerate as good or evil, right or wrong—as Politically
Correct or incorrect—within the context of
said ‘Community’s’ contemporaneous reality, its Sitz im Leben; (a most conveniently manipulable definition of reality for any given contemporaneous elitist “Community” representatives—let us say “Organizers”—for it permits them to re-define as their momentarily preferred definition of reality—just who is in their composite “Community” at any given time and who specifically is not to be tolerated in it, yet they assert that their belief is in Unity, Tolerance, Inclusion, Plurality, and Multi-
culturalism. The Sitz im Leben concept advanced by the Liberal schools of textual criticism is nothingless than formalized delusional construction of false realitys. It is madness.
This delusional extension of authority unto themselves to redefine reality is at the root of the predominant Liberal-socialist, “Progressive” psychological trait—that trait of being delusional.
The stereo-typical formation of the Liberalsocialist’s delusional non-existant construct of a reality—the Liberal-socialists infamous utopian vision—is a manifestation of the Liberalsocialists application of an idealistic Sitz im Leben.
Liberalism, whether theistic or claiming to be atheistic, is a religion.
The Liberal, Radical, “Higher,” ‘Progressive,’ Documentarian, Source critics, or Form Critics, or Redactionists—all ‘birds of a feather,’ construct their arguments surrounding biblical textual criticism on an ideological foundation that is a religion and totalitarian in nature.
Liberal-Socialism’s, or Liberalism’s, or “Progressivism’s” moral relativism—as opposed to the belief in absolute truth—is the cornerstone of the Liberal-socialist perversions of the concepts of Pluralism, Diversity, Multiculturalism, Inclusivity, Unity, and Tolerance which are all deviously united as a counterfeit to the absolute Truth inscribed
within the Word of God—the Light of the world—in a diabolical rainbow coalition of faulty assertions and false doctrines based on presupposition and conjecture and advanced under an intellectually indefensible banner of, the primary doctrines of the religion of Liberalism: Moral Relativism and “Political Correctness.”
Since it is fundamental to the Liberal’s delusion that they themselves are embued with
‘a great new insight,’ (‘The Book of Confessions.
The Constitution of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)
Office of the General Assembly. 100 Witherspoon Street. Louisville, KY. Copyright 2004.), Liberal ‘theologians’ assume the delusional belief that it is they who know what is good and what is evil—what is right and what
is wrong—what is to be tolerated and what is not; hence the imperative for Moral Relativism, for the elitist, ‘Supermen,’ ‘Legislative Leader,’ ‘Community Organizer,’ ‘Master Thinkers’ not only insist that they know good from evil, but that they have the right to alter their position on any question of morality as the prevailing ‘spirit of the Age,’ or Zeitgeist,so moves them within any future Sitz im Leben they choose to define as a reality.
Adherents of the Graff-Wellhausen Documentary Hypothesis –all of the Radical, ‘Higher,’ Liberal literary critics that is to say— provide the ideological underpinnings for the Liberal-socialist’s indefensible political arguments that they use to justify their assumption of control over the many within a
nation’s population by the few, the elite, as Frederic Bastiat wrote ‘Supermen’ within the ranks of the Liberal’s “Legislative Leaders,” ‘Master Thinkers,’ or “Community Organizers.”
Fundamental to the religion of Liberalism’s belief system is that the enigmatically gifted with an higher insight few, the ‘Master Thinkers’—what Bastiat describes in ‘The Law. the Classic Blueprint for a Just Society’ as the ‘Superman Idea’—are themselves as gods knowing good and evil, right from wrong.
Satan’s postulation that God had said something He had not said; that God had said to Adam and Eve that they were not to eat from EVERY tree in the Garden, made in his deceptive question when he asked, “Hath God
indeed said, “You shall not eat of every
tree of the Garden?” (Gen. 3:1) along with the suggestion that they would in fact “be as gods, knowing good and evil.” are
mirrored in the false assertions of Liberalsocialism and integral to the religious dogma of the religion known by a multitude of labels including Liberalism, Secular-humanism, Humanism, Marxism, and Progressivism.
The rejection of what God has said in His Word is a basic tenet of Liberalism which, embracing theLiberal “theologians” false assertions that Man directed the development, the “evolution,” of the Bible also maintains that Man, or more specifically certain enigmatically gifted with a mysterious Gnostic insight, a superior spiritual and intellectual illumination;
‘Master Thinker’ ‘Legislative Leader’ ‘Supermen’ with an innate, mystic ability to ‘Organize’ their perversion of the concept of community, that is to say make the decisions on just what is good and just what is evil, the Satanic counterfeit to the Body of Christ that is the Liberals potulation of an homogenous “Community” composed of whosoever they wish to include or exclude.
The quintessentially American concept of community has historically been that of ‘Once
Nation Under God,’ but proponents of the
religion of Liberalism attempt to supplant that traditional concept with a new meaning of the definition of “community” to mean their godless, pluralistic, multi-cultural, morally relativistic, Secular-humanist, ‘Progressive,’
“Tolerant,” profane assemblage of many disparate members they wish at any given time to include in or exclude from their so-called ‘Community.’ The so-called ‘Community’ of the religion of Liberalism is a counterfeit composition to true Christian unity in the Body of Christ. It is an impostor.
"The Superman Idea:
The claims of these organizers of humanity raise another question which I have often asked them and which, so far as I know, they have never answered: If the natural tendencies of mankind are so bad that it is not safe to permit people to be free, how is it that the tendencies of these organizers are always good? Do not legislators and their appointed agents also belong to the human race? Or do they believe
that they themselves are made of a finer clay than the rest of mankind? The organizers maintain that society, when left undirected, rushes headlong to its inevitable destruction because the instincts of the people are so perverse. The legislators claim to stop this suicidal course and to give it a saner direction.
Apparently, then, the legislators and the organizers have received from Heaven an intelligence and virtue that place them beyond and above mankind; if so, let them show titles to this superiority."
They would be shepherds over us, their sheep. Certainly such an arrangement presupposes that they are naturally superior to the rest of us. And certainly we are fully justified in demanding from the legislators and organizers proof of this natural superiority."
(‘The Law. the Classic Blueprint for a Just Society.’ By Frederic Bastiat. Pp. 63-64.)
"While society is struggling toward Liberty, these famous men who put themselves at its head are filled with the spirit of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. They think only of subjecting mankind to the philanthropic tyranny
of their own social interventions." (‘The Law.’ Pg.52.) "...they desire to force mankind docilely to bear this yoke of the public welfare that they have dreamed up in their own imaginations." (‘The Law.’ Pg. 53.) "The claims of these organizers of humanity...", agnostic, Secularhumanist, Liberal-socialist, “Progressive,” ‘Supermen,’ Democrat “Master thinkers, "...raise another question which I have often asked them and which, so far as I know, they have never answered: If the natural tendencies of mankind are so bad that it is not safe to permit people to be free, how is it that the tendencies of these organizers are always good?" (‘The Law.’ Pg. 63.)
“Ideologies aren’t all that important. What’s important is psychology. The Democratic constituency is just like a herd of cows. All you have to do is lay out enough silage and they come running. That’s why I became an operative working with
Democrats. With Democrats all you have to do is make a lot of noise, lay out the hay, and be ready to use the ole cattle prod in case a few want to bolt the herd. Eighty percent of the people who call themselves Democrats don’t have a clue as to political reality. What amazes me is that you could take a group of people who are hard workers and convince them that they should support social programs that were the exact opposite of their own personal convictions. Put a little fear here and there and you can get people to vote any way you want. The voter is basically dumb and lazy. The reason I became a Democratic operative instead of a Republican was because there were
more Democrats that didn’t have a clue than there were Republicans. Truth is relative. Truth is what you can make the voter believe is the truth. If you’re smart enough, truth is what you make the voter think it is. That’s why I’m a Democrat. I can make the Democratic voters think whatever I want them to.”~ Attorney James Carville, lead Democrat strategist for Bill Clinton.
Satan’s assertion in his abominable dualistic lie brought desolation into the Garden of Eden. He asserted that God really did not say what He has said—of course altering what it is that God had actually said in his lie.
That same assertion, that God did not say what He actually said, is postulated as the central assertion of the Radical Historicalcritical schools of literary textual criticism. It is the Form critics contention that God did not “say” what is written in the Bible at all, but that certain gnostically gifted men “said” it inspired by a contemporaneous Zeitgeist within their specific Sitz im Leben and that the compilation of the Bible proceeded in an evolutionary and developmental manner through such gnostically endowed, sociologically gifted with a verstehen, ‘Master Thinker’ “Brights.”
It is as well the underlying argument of the Liberal-socialist’s philosophical and political ideology that necissarily denies the Godbreathed authority of Scripture and maintains
that the biblical texts evolved; that the message in Scripture was determined by mere men according to the needs of their “Community” and not by God; that God didn’t “say” it, men “said” it; (“said” in the sense of the metaphorical voice recognized in literature.)
The determination of what is good, that is to say what is legally and morally right, and what is evil, or what is legally and morally wrong, what is to be tolerated, homosexuality for example, and what is not, Christians praying before a government meeting, is as well asserted by Liberal-socialism as a natural right and responsibility of the Liberal’s postulation of what Bastiat describes as a ‘Superman’ construct—the right to re-interpret or even rewrite Scripture to suit the shifting sands of their ever changing positions on just what is good and evil, what is right and wrong.
Liberalism epitomizes Moral Relativism for whatever an adherent to the Liberal-socialist religious dogma determines as good or evil today, right or wrong tomorrow, is always
relative and susceptible to later re-evaluation as the desires of their hearts so moves them or even as the ‘spirit of the Age,’ the Zeitgeist, moves them.
The Liberal-socialists rejection of moral absolutes is a manifestation of believing the lie that they are capable of determining what is good and what is evil and the reason why Liberal-socialists are rightly condemned for their irrational, illogical Moral Relativity.
“For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.”—Gen. 3:5. King
James Bible "Authorized Version", Cambridge Edition
Liberal-socialists idolize human beings, God’s creation, in place of worshiping the Lord Jesus, the Messiah, the Person of the Holy Pneuma, and God the Father, the one true God, YHWH, the Creator.
To suggest that the information conveyed within the quad-code of
DNA haphazardly assembled itself and then suddenly life sprang from a puddle of material is shere nonsense.
“DNA is like a computer program but far, far more advanced than any software ever created.”–Bill Gates
Liberal “Theologian’s” Indefensible Methods of Higher Literary Textual Criticism:
“That the then-current evolutionary philosophy of Hegel had a definite effect on Old Testament studies is clearly attested to by Herbert Hahn: “The conception of historical development was the chief contribution of the liberal critics to the exegesis of the Old Testament. It is true of course that this conception did not grow merely from an objective reading of the sources. In a larger sense, it was a reflection of the intellectual temper of the times. The genetic conception of Old Testament history fitted in with the evolutionary principle of
interpretation prevailing in contemporary science and philosophy. In the natural sciences, the influence of Darwin had made the theory of evolution the predominant hypothesis affecting research.”
“In every department of historical investigation the conception of development was being used to explain the history of man’s thought, his institutions, and even his religious faiths. It was not strange that the same principle should be applied to the explanation of Old Testament history. In every age exegesis has concormed (Sic) to the thought forms of the time, and in the latter half of the nineteenth century thought was dominated by the
scientific methods and an evolutionary view of history. 31/9,10”” (‘Evidence That Demands a
Verdict' by Josh McDowell, Volume II, Pg. 55. Here’s Life Publishers, Inc. ISBN 0-918956-73-0. Siting 31: Hahn, Herbert F. The Old Testament in Modern Research. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1966.)
“In the historical sciences and in the areas of religious and philosophical thought, the evolutionary concept had begun to exercise a powerful influence after Hegel had substituted the notion of ‘becoming’ for the idea of ‘being.’ He had arrived at the notion by a priori reasoning without testing it by scientific application to observable fact, but Hegel was none the less the intellectual progenitor of the modern point of view.”
(Josh McDowell, Evidence That Demands A Verdict, Vol.
I. Pg.55. 31/9,10. Siting 31: Hahn, Herbert F. The Old Testament in Modern Research. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1966.)
The Graf-Wellhausen Documentary Hypothesis was spawned in the age when Darwinian evolutionary thought permeated all areas of investigation from Wellhausen’s application of Hegel’s to literary textual criticism—especially biblical higher textual criticism.
So the 'Darwinian' Theory of Evolution— existent long before Mr. Darwin popularized it—exerted its developmental aspects on the age in which Wellhausen adopted Hegel’s earlier developmental conclusions surrounding
literary textual criticism, and especially the textual criticism of biblical source documents.
Blindly resorting to the morally relative, currently popular Liberal-socialist perversions of the concepts of “Political Correctness,” “Tolerance,” “Pluralism,” “Inclusion,” “Diversity,” “Multiculturalism,” “Unity,” etc..., upon which to base one's ideological principles, one’s moral values, as well as a nation’s laws, establishes those principles, embraced as RELIGIOUS BELIEFS, upon shifting sands of moral relativism, and too relegates the pronouncement of just what contemporaneously popular version of said Liberal-socialist, ‘Progressive,’ “Modern,” Liberal, Secular-humanist concepts shall be deemed acceptable at any given moment in
time or place in the future by whomsoever within the absurd Liberal construct of a "Community," within their conveniently defined ‘Sitz im Leben’ that is to say, happens to be in leadership position—the 'Superman Du Jour’ so to speak—to re-define as said enigmatically gifted with a sociologically defined verstehen or Gnostic wisdom ‘Superman’ sees fit to re-define within his own personal conveneintly defined ‘Sitz im Leben’ or reality—whatsoever he wishes to re-define as the prevailing "Zeitgeist," or ‘Spirit of the Age,’ so leads him. Liberalism is a delusional, totalitarian religion.
It’s past time for the biblically founded Body of Christ within the fabric of American society to put an end to the insanity of dialoguing with
delusional Liberals. Jesus did not dialogue with the devil—He refuted Satan with the Word of God.
The delusional, irrational circular reasoning of Liberals permits adherents to the religion of Liberalism to continuously re-define standards
of morality according to the lusts of their own hearts.
Liberalism’s so-called ‘Zeitgeist,’ their “Spirit of the Age,” is the spirit of the anti-christ for embracing a Liberal-socialist worldview one presuppositionally asserts that men may be as
gods with a mysterious higher knowledge, Sociology’s verstehen, also known as Gnostic insight.
The “Change” that the religion of Liberalism continuously advocates is always on a continuum of whatsoever within their morally relative worldview their self-proclaimed “Master Thinkers,” those gifted with an higher, enigmatic Sociologically defined verstehen, prefer at any given moment in time that said “Change” should be.
At its root the “Change” advocated by Liberals is always hedonistic and licentious; ‘Self’ serving and sinful for at its root it is demonically inspired rebellion against God’s authority.
The Liberal's "Superman," “Community Organizer,” “Legislator Leader,” ‘Master Thinkers’ must at each and every step
‘Forward’ in time within the "Progressive"
Liberal-socialist plan for America to
“Change” according to their delusional,
irrational circular "reasoning," be extended the authority to dictate precisely what is or is not “Politically Correct;” is or is not to be ‘Tolerated;’ is or is not sufficiently ‘Pluralistic;’ is or is not adequately ‘Inclusive;’ is or is not acceptably ‘Multicultural;’ is or is not appropriately ‘Unified’ or ‘Diverse.’ Nota bene
the word "dictate" in the last sentence and its relationship to the word ‘dictator’ and beware.
Faulty biblical doctrine embraced by American Christians was as responsible for the perpetuation of the institution of slavery as the enormous profits to be made. Similarly, unbiblical economic principles today allow
proponents of so-called ‘Progressive’ Liberal-
within both the Democrat and Republican political parties to further enslave a group of
socialism people in the bondage of the multitudinous metaphorical chains of Socialism on the Liberalsocialist, Democrat Party’s welfare-state, socalled “Progressive,” metaphorical plantation of government dependency including:
a) Spiritual chains forged in the denial of the authority of Scripture and the rejection of every Man’s need of a Savior;
b) Ideological chains forged in the lies of the Liberal-socialist’s morally relevant worldview which leads directly to a denial of absolute Truth; and
c) Economic chains forged in the irrational arguments of the Liberal-socialist’s welfare state utopian fantasy, which, under their irrational system upon metaphorical modernday slave plantation—a “Progressive” Plantation—run by the Liberal-socialist “Progressive” Democrat Party’s delusional, selfproclaimed as elite “Bright” “Master Thinker” ‘Community Organizers,’ or as Frederic Bastiat identified them, “Supermen” “Legislative Leaders,” effectively enslaves recipients of the re-distributed “benefits” upon the Democrat
Party’s metaphorical ‘Progressive’ plantation of governmental reliance that depletes individuals of the motivations necessary to be independent—
to be free—to realize
their God-given Liberty.
The Body of Christ, His true Church militant, the Bride of Christ Jesus the risen Lord of the Bible who came in the flesh must divide from those who attempt to protect and preserve America’s recognition of God-given Liberty aside from supporting the adoption of a reverential attitude towards the Creator, Jesus, as the Truth recognized as the very Source of all men’s Liberty in our nation’s Constitution that is typified in America’s motto ‘In God We
and breathing document’ fallacy of an ‘evolving
document’ is the crowbar by which the religion of Liberalism has pried its way into one-time doctrinally sound Christian denominations
around the world and altered the biblically sound doctrines and tenets of those once doctrinally sound churches from sound footing upon the Bible to the morally relativistic, continuously “evolving” footing of the Liberal so-called ‘theologian’s’ Radical Historicalcritical schools of Higher textual criticism which re-invent their fabricated and ‘evolving’ interpretations of biblical texts dependent upon any given contemporaneous ‘Spirit of the Age’ or Zeitgeist howsoever they wish to reinvent their ‘developing’ interpretations of the Text of the Bible and more specifically, the religious doctrines determined from the Text, at any given moment in time.
By removing God as the Author, the Liberal ‘theologians’ then assume the right and
responsibility to re-interpret and even re-write Scripture howsoever they FEEL appropriate— motivated, as they claim, by a ‘spirit of the Age,’ or Zeitgeist, existing within their particular ‘Sitz im Leben,’ their conveniently defined reality otherwise known as a delusion, and therefore, so they claim, they, the ‘Master Thinkers,’ have the authority over the direction in which their so-called “Community” shall move “Forward” and the authority to “Change” the interpretation and/or writing of the biblical texts in question—or of society’s laws, i.e. the Constitution—in order to arrive at whatever doctrinal stance or legal determination on any given question of morality that they wish to assume at any given time and place.
The very same method of undermining the authority of Scripture that has been employed by the Form critics, (also known as “Higher” critics; Radical critics; Source critics; Documentarians; Liberal critics; Redactionists, etc.), to justify in their own minds the illegitimate reinterpretation of biblical texts and biblical doctrines based upon the whims of
whatever Liberal-socialist so-called “Bright” or ‘enigmatically gifted with greater new insight’ so called ‘Master Thinker’ (read gnostically enlightened or enigmatically gifted with Sociology’s mysterious verstehen), selfproclaimed ‘Supermen,’ (read ‘Legislative Leaders’ or “Community Organizers”), is at any given time and place being employed by Liberal-socialist politicians and Liberal-socialist news media propagandists to undermine the legitimacy of the authority of the Constitution as written—it is the invalid ‘Living and Breathing Document argument.’
Liberal-socialist ‘Progressive’ Democrats, and increasingly more Republicans as well, attempt to maintain in the same manner as that employed by Liberal “theologians” when they strip the authority from biblical texts that it is their right and duty to re-interpret the meaning of the Constitution within the context
of what they define as today’s ‘spirit of the Age,’ or Zeitgeist, and within the present day’s “Creative Community’s” situational construct of a non-existent reality, a delusionally invented non-existent paradigm, or Sitz im Leben, what they choose to define—according to their feelings on the matter—as the current “Creative Community’s” needs and desires— needs and desires also defined by no one else than they themselves. Liberalism is a mental disorder in which Malignant Narcissism is typically symptomatic.
“The liberties of our country, the freedom of our civil Constitution, are worth defending at all hazards; and it is our duty to defend them against all attacks. We have received them as a fair inheritance from our worthy ancestors: they purchased them for us with toil and danger and expense of treasure and blood, and transmitted them to us with care and diligence. It will
bring an everlasting mark of infamy on the present generation, enlightened as it is, if we should suffer them to be wrested from us by violence without a struggle, or to be cheated out of them by the artifices of false and designing men.”—Samuel Adams.
The Liberal-socialist politicians, whether masquarading as a Republican, Democrat, or Libertarian, assert that the Constitution is a ‘living and breathing,’ evolving document—NOT in the sense that the Constitution may be amended by legal means, but in the Liberal
‘theologian’s’ sense of the Liberal-socialist ‘Legislative Leader’ elite ‘Master Thinkers’ or ‘Brights’ having a Higher Power, a Gnostic insight, a verstehen, directed by a spiritual entity—the Zeitgeist, extended the right and duty to simply re-interpret the words within the document to mean whatsoever it is that they wish them to mean at any given time and place within any given delusional redefining of reality—their Sitz im Leben.
The modus operandi of the Liberal “scholars” which has been so very successful in tearing down many bulwarks of one-time doctrinally sound Christian denominations and has been instrumental in leading many within said one-time doctrinally sound Christian denominations into apostasy is now being
utilized to justify the rejection of the authority of the Constitution of the United States of America. The modus operandi used to reject
the authority of Scripture is the so-called “Living and Breathing Document” argument and it is now being employed to undermine the authority of the Constitution.
Claiming it to be a "living and breathing document," self-proclaimed Liberal ‘Master Thinkers’ then simply assume the 'Legislative Leader's' presumptuously asserted right that they have a duty to herd said ‘living and breathing document’s ’ interpretation and
meaning in whatsoever ideological direction they FEEL at any given time to be an appropriate direction in which to re-direct the interpretation of the document within the context of any given Sitz im Leben—the extant circumstances out of which the Radical critics maintain, for example, that the biblical texts “evolved” according to the needs and desires of said contemporaneous 2nd Century “Creative Community”)—inspired, as the Liberal proponents believe, by the contemporaneous ‘spirit of an Age,’ that is to say “Zeitgeist,” the same spirit, so the ‘Higher,’ Form critics claim, that inspired the men who were inspired by God’s Holy Pneuma to pen or dictate the autographs that were copied and compiled into the entire Corpus of Holy Scripture.
The German language terms: Zeitgeist, Sitz im Leben, verstehen, etc., are most helpful in obscuring from Anglophones the logically irrational, intellectually indefensible, invalid
nature of the contentions represented by the nebulous terms.
“An evolutionary understanding of history and an anthropocentric view of religion dominated the 19th century. The prevailing thinkers viewed religion as devoid of any divine intervention, explaining it as a natural development produced by man’s subjective needs.”
(‘Evidence That Demands a Verdict' by Josh McDowell, Volume II, Pg. 55. Here’s Life Publishers, Inc. ISBN 0918956-73-0.)
"We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a religious and moral people. It is wholly inadequate for the government of any other." ~ John Adams,
Letter to the Officers of the First Brigade of the Third Division of the Militia of Massachusetts (October 11, 1798.)
Unity with or compromise with Liberalsocialists or any other group that denies the self-evident truth that all men are created equal and endowed by none other than their Creator, the Lord Jesus of the Bible, with certain unalienable rights including the right to Liberty is anti-American.
Jesus did not debate with the devil. Christian Conservatives should not entertain the arguments of the delusional Liberal-socialist Progressive Secular-humanists within the Democrat Partyor the Republican Party.
Self-appointed leaders within the Liberalsocialist, Secular-humanist, Progressive,
Democrat ‘Community’ believe that they possess the Sociologically defined concept of verstehen that is nothing less than Gnosticism’s concept of a mystical insight revived, an higher wisdom with which to lead the rest of society— with which to know ‘good and evil,’ and then proceed to dictate to the rest of society just precisely is good, i.e. morally acceptable, and what is evil, morally unacceptable, according to they themselves relative to how they feel at any given time and place.
The indefensible Radical Historical-critical schools of literary textual criticism—the Form critics—are anti-Christian, anti-American, and they have wrought great damage upon the Christian Church and upon the fabric of American society.
At the end of the day it is they who would deny the rest of us who reject their indefensible arguments our freedom of speech.
They preach “Tolerance,” but epitomize intolerance.
The fact of the matter is that under intense journalistic investigation—even under superficial scrutiny—by educated men, not those indoctrinated into the religion of Liberalism, who might be said rightly to possess any semblance of integrity, the arguments—
ALL the arguments—of the Liberalsocialists/Communists crumble like the walls of Jericho.
Mr. Barack Hussein Obama’s Mentor, Saul Alinsky:
“Here’s the guy…” Alinsky “…honors as “the first radical” on the dedication page of the first edition: Lest we forget at least an over-theshoulder acknowledgement to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins—or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own
kingdom—Lucifer.” (Whistleblower Magazine; Vol.
21, No. 5. May 2012. ‘The Wannabe Tyrant’s Secret’ By David Kupelian. Pg. 43.)
“The Bible clearly teaches that the end times will be characterized by a strong spiritual delusion that blinds many from the true gospel and also leads those who have believed into apostasy.” (Another Jesus:
The Ecumenical Christ and the New Evangelization. By Roger Oakland with Jim Tetlow.Copyright 2004. Pg. 12.)
The Form critics equate the compilation of the biblical texts with the historically evidentiary ‘katapoleis’ (a transliteration from the ancient Greek), evolutionary process of Greek Mythology. They assert that the enigmatically gifted neo-Gnostic construct of what Bastiat called the 'Superhuman Idea' have a right within the Community as organizers to redirect as they see fit within any preferred
definition of Sitz im Leben that they they desire to conveniently describe—and under the assumed guidance of what they describe as the Zeitgeist—a force that they recognize and describe as the spirit of any given age including the present. Liberalism, Progressivism, or Liberal-socialism is a religion—plain and simple.
The Religion of Liberalism:
The religion of Liberalism or Secularhumanism, or “Progressivism’s” elevation of elite ‘Superman’ ‘Legislative Leaders,’ characterized within the doctrines of the cult of Liberalism that are incorporated in the writings of the highly subjective “science” of Sociology as “Master Thinkers,” (‘Developing as Rational
Persons: Viewing Our Development in Stages’ (1996. By Elder, L. with Paul, R. www.criticalthinking.org), is a
delusional manifestation of a mental and spiritual disorder among those who consider themselves so superiorly elevated above the rest of we ‘mere mortals’—or shall I say ‘We the People’—with a sociologically defined verstehen provided by what they claim is the “Spirit of the Age,” or Zeitgeist, within any given time or place of which they insist on the right, as ‘Master Thinkers’ themselves to define, or Sitz im Leben, known as
malignant narcissism that is nothing
less than a reflection in men’s hearts and minds of the arrogant pride which preceded Lucifer’s being cast down from Heaven and a present day embracing of Satan’s original lie—a lie formulated in two parts: The question, ‘Did God really say?’ And the false assertion that Man could ‘be as gods.’
Conveniently, the Liberalsocialist/Communist 'Legislative Leaders' define their so-called "Community" howsoever they wish to define it at any given moment in time, yet one fact remains constant: Those who believe in Absolute Truth in the person of Jesus
Christ, commonly referred to as "Christians," are not considered a part of their Liberalsocialist Community for Christianity is not inclusive in the morally relativistic sense that the religion of Liberalism’s dogma requires of its adherents, or in other words: Christianity is divisive because Christians hold fast to the Truth that Jesus is the Lord—the One and only true God—and that He came in the flesh to be the atoning sacrifice for sin that men might be restored unto fellowship with God the Father through Him and have eternal life in Him alone.
The only thing holding back a restoration of America as a Bible believing, Creator acknowledging and revering, Constitution adhering government ‘of the People’ is the Lord’s People’s failure to rely upon Him, upon
His Word—to defend It as authoritative and to live by It.
The so-called “Higher” critics have deceived many within the fabric of American society for too long. In order to reduce their destructive influence Christians should make known the error of the Radical Historical-critical schools of literary textual criticism commonly known as Form critics and engage in the spiritual warfare as well as the academic battles unfolding in our day.
American Christians are largely and woefully unprepared to give an answer to a question regarding the reason for their faith in the Christ or to contend for the faith that
Christians have in the risen Lord Jesus of the Bible. Therefore the Liberal-socialist, Democrat Party enabling, Communist, ‘Progressives' stand as firmly as they are at any given moment able upon the shifting sands of their morally relative argument that their religious contention that their elite ‘Superman’ ‘Community Organizers,’ ‘Legislative Leaders,’ or ‘Bright’ ‘Master Thinkers’ have a natural right eminating from a contemporaneous and colloquial Zeitgeist within their own personal, utopian, delusional construct of a definition for their reality, or Sitz im Leben, be extended authority by the rest of society—the Non-brights—to determine within any contemporaneous Sitz im Leben, motivated by what they choose to define upon the Liberalsocialists sliding-scale spectrum of morally acceptable behaviors, (so that they are free to change their mind at any time in the future
regarding any issues purported “morality" that, embracing their irrational, illogical reasoning becomes entirely relative, hence the accurate accusations of hedonistic moral relativity), as the Zeitgeist, or ‘spirit of the Age’ moves them to re-define what is good and what is evil, what is right and what is wrong.
It is Written:
”For the wrath of God is revealed from Heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the
truth in unrighteousness, because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them. For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse, because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Professing to be wise, they became fools. and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible
man—and birds and four-footed animals and creeping things. Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves,
who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator,
who is blessed forever, Amen.
For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due. And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting;
being filled with all unrighteousness, sexual immorality, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness, full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, evilmindedness, they are whisperers, backbiters, haters of God, violent, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, undiscerning, untrustworthy, un-loving, unforgiving, unmerciful; who knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them.” (Romans 1:18-32. The Spirit Filled
Bible. Personal Study Bible Unveiling God’s Fullness in All God’s Word. New King James Version. Thomas Neal, Inc. Nashville, Tennessee. Copyright 1983.Bible. Pg. 168889.)
America is facing today a test no different than the Jews faced again and again as recorded in a multitude of historically trustworthy Old Testament narratives.
“The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.”—Ecclesiastes 1:9. King James Bible
Authorized Version, Cambridge Edition.
"The Vicious Circle of Socialism
We shall never escape from this circle: the idea of passive mankind, and the power of the law being used by a great man to propel the people.
Once on this incline, will society enjoy some liberty? (Certainly.) And what is liberty..." (‘The Law.’ Pg. 58) "...liberty is power. Of what does this
power consist? (Of being educated and of being given the tools of production.) Who is to give the education and the tools of production? (Society, which owes them to everyone.) By what action is society to give tools of production to those who do not own them? (why by the action of the state.) And from whom will the state take them?
Let the reader answer that question. Let him also notice the direction in which this is taking us.
The Doctrine of the Democrats
The strange phenomenon of our times—one which will probably astound our descendants— is the doctrine based on this triple hypothesis: the total inertness of mankind, the omnipotence of the law, and the infallibility of the legislator. These three ideas form the sacred symbol of those who proclaim themselves totally democratic.
The advocates of this doctrine also profess to be social. So far as they are democratic, they place unlimited faith in mankind. But so far as they are social, they regard mankind as little better than mud. Let us examine this contrast in greater detail.
What is the attitude of the democratic when political rights are under discussion? How does he regard the people when a legislator is to be chosen? Ah, then it is claimed that the people have an instinctive wisdom; they are gifted with the finest perception; their will is always right; the general will cannot err; voting cannot be too universal.
When it is time to vote, apparently the voter is not to be asked for any guarantee of his wisdom. His will and capacity to choose wisely are taken for granted. Can the people be mistaken? Are we not living in an age of enlightenment? What! Are the people always to be kept on leashes? Have they not won their rights by great effort and sacrifice? Have they
not given ample proof of their intelligence and wisdom? Are they not adults Are they not capable of judging for themselves? Do they not know what is best for themselves? Is there a class or a man who would be so bold as to set himself above the people, and judge and act for them? No, no, the people are and should be free. They desire to manage their own affairs, and they shall do so.
But when the legislator is finally elected— ah! Then indeed the tone of his speech undergoes radical change. The people are returned to passiveness, inertness, and unconsciousness; the legislator enters into omnipotence. Now it is time for him to initiate, to direct, to propel, and to organize. Mankind has only to submit; the hour of despotism has
struck. We now observe this fatal idea: The people who, during the election, were so wise, so moral, and so perfect, now have no tendencies whatever; or if they have any, they are tendencies that lead downward into degradation." (‘The Law.’ Pp. 59-61.)
Just as God’s Chosen People, the Jews, were given the choice to repent of their apostasy time and time again, America is now poised to give a response to God’s merciful extension of an opportunity to repent.
May it be God’s will that American Christians turn from their wicked ways— primarily the wickedness of embracing the invalid schools of literary textual criticism which deny the inspiration of, and therefore the authority of, Scripture—that is the very foundation of the delusional Liberal-socialist, Secular-humanist, Progressive, worldview foundational of the Liberal religion embraced by Democrats—and more and more Republicans who claim to be Christian and
politically conservative—underlying so many of the problems facing America.
The Liberal-socialist, Radical Historicalcritical schools of textual criticism are the foundation to the Liberal-socialists preposterous assertion that their Liberal "theologians" and literary textual critics have a right to not only re-interpret the biblical Texts but to REWRITE Them according to their 'great new insight,' (as the apostate Presbyterian Church U.S.A.'s Church's ‘Book of Confessions’ describes it.) That is how the Liberal so-called "theologians" have so perverted properly exegeted sound Church doctrines. It is also the philosophical underpinning of the Liberalsocialist political ideology that assumes that their ‘Legislative Leaders,’ their ‘Brights,’ their ‘Supermen,’ their ‘Master Thinkers,’ and ‘Community Organizers’ have the authority to tell the rest of society what is good and right and what is evil and wrong.
Numerous Quotations Regarding Liberal-socialism And/Or Liberals:
"It has been well said that really up-to-date liberals do not care what people do, as long as it is compulsory."—George Will
"A liberal, in the current sense of the term, is a person who favors a massive welfare state, expansive and intrusive government, high taxation, preferential allocation of social goods to designated 'victim' groups, and deference to international bureaucracies in matters of foreign policy."—John Derbyshire
"Liberals aren't always so liberal when people disapprove of their point of view."—Clint Eastwood
"...frothing-at-the-mouth liberals venting their spleens made me chuckle. There's nobody more intolerant and narrow-minded than a tolerant and open-minded liberal, is there?”—Brian Francoeur
"Liberals can't separate their emotions to take a look at the logic and facts."—Chris Mulder
"I've never quite been able to figure out why liberals self-identify with qualities such as 'bright', 'non-conforming', and 'hanging loose', then turn around and demand a system of government that represses creativity and initiative, stifles individuality, robs the productive to support the slothful, and demands
a high degree of unthinking conformity. ... Liberals seem to think they are libertarians, but until they learn that economic freedom is more important to the health of a free society than sexual license, they will remain Stalinists in drag."—Mr. Jeeves
"Liberalism: the haunting fear that someone, somewhere, can help themselves"
and "Annoy a Liberal: Work.
Succeed. Be Happy"—Bumper stickers.
"A fact to a liberal is like Kryptonite to Superman."—Larry Elder
"Remember, to a liberal, anyone who makes money in an endeavor frowned upon by liberals is 'greedy' and any person who expresses an idea contrary to basic liberal dogma is preaching 'hate.' How shallow these people are."—Neal Boortz
“The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so.”—Ronald Reagan
"Liberals fear Christians more than they fear Muslims. It is a sign of their insanity."—KMR
"Liberals in this country think the world is the UN and France. It isn’t."—Alexander K. McClure
"Only a liberal can see and hear a liberal and say, 'That's not liberal!' But there's a reason for that—to a liberal, liberal is not liberal; it's mainstream."—Robert Cooper
"Liberals want a disarmed, docile, easily controlled and dependent on Government populace."—Khankrum
"There is nothing so pitiable as a liberal with no one to pity."—Mr. Lizard
"Liberals seem to assume that, if you don't believe in their particular political solutions, then you don't really care about the people that they claim to want to help."—Dr. Thomas Sowell
"Liberals live for the idea that they're saving the world from the racial, religious, and sexual bigotry of conservatives. Yet, looking at the conservative web, I am continually amazed at the fellowship across all of these potential divides."—Stanley Kurtz
"Wealth may provoke envy, but it seldom provokes the truly venomous levels of resentment provoked by achievement. There is no surer way for a minority group to become hated than to enter a country as destitute immigrants and then, through long hours of hard work, rise to a level of prosperity above that of the indigenous population."—Dr. Thomas Sowell
"Asking liberals where wages and prices come from is like asking six-year-olds where babies come from."—Dr. Thomas Sowell
"People who are very aware that they have more knowledge than the average person are often very unaware that they do not have onetenth of the knowledge of all of the average persons put together. In this situation, for the intelligentsia to impose their notions on ordinary people is essentially to impose ignorance on knowledge."—Dr. Thomas Sowell
"As with so many things that liberals believe, they feel no need to test their notions against reality."—Dr. Thomas Sowell
"Liberals are more and more becoming like the Crips, dangerous but stupid."—DJ Drummond
"The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened."—Norman Thomas, Socialist Party Presidential Candidate 1940, 1944 and 1948 and co-founder of the American Civil Liberties Union.
"Big-government liberals don’t like people with a sense of independence … because independent people don’t need big government."—Neal Boortz
"The reason the liberal message is not being heard, despite liberal control of almost all public organs of communication, is that it is incoherent. The message, not a lack of messengers, is the contemporary liberal problem."—
"Liberalism is not a political philosophy or coherent set of beliefs. It is a psychological strategy to avoid being envied."—Jack Wheeler "Many of our fellow citizens no longer have the tolerant souls and morals of free men and women. They have the souls and morals of busybodies and petty tyrants who want to run their neighbors' lives."—Edward L. Hudgins
"What is it about control freaks that makes them so obsessed about butting into your life and planning it all for you whether you like it or not?"—Bert Rand
"With liberals, everything is eternally somebody else's fault. Facts to the contrary are irrelevant."—Edward Britto
"Liberals are like the monkeys in Rudyard Kipling's The Jungle Book who explain: 'We all say so, and so it must be true'."—Ann Coulter
"Ultimately, however, as the Austrian economist Joseph Schumpeter pointed out, a powerful bureaucratic class is in the same
relation to commerce as was the scorpion in Aesop to the dog on whose back he crossed the river. They will destroy commerce and establish socialism, even if it kills them, because that is their nature."—John Derbyshire
"Socialism, like the ancient ideas from which it springs, confuses the distinction between government and society. As a result of this, every time we object to a thing being done by government, the socialists conclude that we object to its being done at all."—Frederic Bastiat.”
The elections in 2014 and 2016 will be meaningless until the Christian Church in America turns from and rejects the unbiblical deception within the Body of Christ that is the perversion of the Gospel promoted by the demonically inspired Liberal scholars and
humbles itself before God—then He will hear our prayer and heal our land.
Don't Be Deceived By So-Called "Conservatives":
2008 presidential candidate Dr. Alan Keyes warns of the ubiquitous advance of socialist ideology within both major American political parties when he writes, "...the term "conservative" becomes an inherently shifty concept. Its meaning entirely depends on the nature of present circumstances. At present America is in the grip of a pervasively socialistminded elite faction. The Democrats represent its risk-taking, "Gordian knot" wing (socialism at one blow); the GOP's elitist leadership represents its more risk-averse "gradualist"
wing (socialism one bite at a time.) But, on the whole, the infamous Newsweek magazine cover that announced "We are all socialists now" speaks for this elite faction. Emboldened by Obama's election, it openly declared what has, de facto, been true of America's political elite since Ronald Reagan left office.”
“After Obama's orchestrated "victory," one glimpsed the possibility that the elitist GOP leaders are also tempted openly to jettison the GOP's principled conservative facade. In 2009, Mitt Romney joined Jeb Bush and others "for the inaugural event of the National Council for a New America." As reported in the Washington Times, the air was filled with talk of the principles and core values of the GOP. But the newspaper's editors chose to headline what they portrayed as Jeb Bush's view that it was "Time to leave Reagan behind" (as Reagan said the Democratic Party did when it turned openly to socialism?); "to give up ... nostalgia for the heyday of the Reagan era and look forward, even if it means stealing the winning strategy deployed by Democrats in the 2008 election." Take note: The Obama faction's 2008 strategy was the typical left-wing socialist ploy (used, for
instance in post-World War II Eastern European countries during the phase of free elections before the Soviet-backed Communists Party consolidated control) of campaigning on pliably empty slogans of change, progress and unity to avoid premature focus on their real goals, which they knew many voters would reject.
Is it unreasonable to suppose that the GOP wing of the socialist-minded elite has been following Jeb Bush's advice? Instead of the cattle-prod slogan of change, they are employing the more powerful cattle prod of fear, anger and revulsion against Obama. They project an Obama "bogeyman" in order to pretend that the threat emanates mainly from his person, not the more pervasive elitist forces whose socialist predilections he merely
represents. Why the pretense? Because Mitt Romney also represents those socialist-minded elite forces. Until recently it was impossible to repress the facts showing that Romney's actions and record marked him as a key leader of the GOP wing of the socialist-minded elite. That was before attempts at GOP party-line repression (ironically also typical of Communist style party politics) emboldened its enforcers to start calling people "traitors" if they dared to discuss Romney's record." ('How Socialist Will 'Conservative' Become?' Dr. Alan Keyes. Aug. 16, 2012. loyaltoliberty.com.)
Dr. Alan Keyes identifies with
brilliantly illuminating light of truth the crystallization of the very essence of the 'inforwar' taking place in America between the
diametrically opposed ideological worldviews vying for control of the 'land of the free' once ruled by a government 'of the People, by the People and for the People,' that is to say, the Secular-humanist, Liberal socialist, "Progressive," Democrat world view and the biblical worldview, when he writes: "The rule of the Creator supersedes every such human claim. It allows each and every individual to claim the right to determine their own actions, so long as those actions conform to the disposition of right in the Creator’s endowment of their way of being (their nature)." ('Why Obama Didn't Appreciate Chick-Fil-A' Aug. 29, 2012. worldnetdaily.com.)
Recognition by America's leaders of the 'rule of the Creator,' the Lord Jesus of the Bible,
the risen, living Christ, is an imperative if Americans would hope that God would bless America—as 'We the People' sometimes prayerfully sing.
If America's leaders do not recognize as Creator the Lord Jesus of the Bible, (not to be confused with the myriad other Jesus's within innumerable religious cults today such as Mormonism or the Jehova’s Witness cult of which God warns His Children in His Word), and as Source of the unalienable rights with which all men are endowed—a recognition so plainly seen by the Founding Fathers of this nation that they found it to be a self-evident truth—then it is only a natural political progression for those leaders to attribute those unalienable rights to another source, even 'another Jesus'—to
identify those rights as originating somewhere other than from an immutable, eternal, omniscient, Holy God, Creator of all that is, and therefore as retractable from said replacement source which, in the Liberal-socialist worldview is from Men inspired by their ‘spirit of the Age.’
'Big-government' "Progressive,” Liberalsocialists will, quite naturally, gravitate towards an ideology which determines those unalienable rights as originating from..., you guessed it, ...the state and their own ‘Master Thinker’ ‘Legislative Leaders’ who make the decsions of state.
More insidious in so far as it is less obvious is the gravitation of the so-called 'Conservative,' so-called 'Christian,' political “Right” who today generally assume an accommodating, unbiblical ideological position which conforms and corresponds to aquiesence to the Liberal's substitutionary source from whence all men's rights originate as authoritative. The so-called “Christian’ Conservative Right has surrendered the battle
in adopting the Liberal-socialist Left’s assertions of their perverted construct of an evolving ‘Community’ in place of ‘One Nation Under God.’
The so-called ‘Conservative Christian Right’ has now largely been blinded by the Liberalsocialist’s ideology and a great many within the ranks of the Right who call themselves Christian now embrace the Liberal's cleverly constructed alternative to the actual Source from where the unalienable rights with which all men are endowed by their Creator originate.
The advances of the Liberal-socialist Left have been achieved through the employment of the Hegelian dialectic, a modern application
of the first part of Satan’s original dualistic lie: ‘Did God really say?’ and ‘You can be as gods.’
Just as our greatest grandmother synthesized an untruth with what God had actually said in her response to the Serpent, the Hegelian dialectic requires a synthesis of a lie with the truth…, the antithesis mixed with a truthful thesis arriving at a synthesis which is a composite of the true and therefore no longer the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
The so-called Conservative Christian Right has been incrementally moved further and further away from the Truth in God’s Word unto the unsure footing—the shifting sands—of today’s Republican Party platform which has
abandoned trust in God, the Creator from whom all men are endowed with certain unalienable rights including the right to Liberty just as Eve was displaced from her sure footing upon the Truth in the Garden when she, listening to Satan’s lies, augmented the truth with lie in her response to the Serpent.
In compromisiing with the Liberal-socialists fallacies—lies—so-called Christian Conservatives within the Republican Party have participated in the synthesis of more and more of the Liberal Progressive Democrat’s lies which has compromised the firm foundation America’s Founders established upon the Creator from whom all men are endowed with certain unalienable rights, Jesus Christ, and thereby imperiled the Liberty which American’s
have been blessed by God to have realized within the American experiment in government of the people.
It is past time for American Christians to fight for the preservation of the said Godendowed Liberty.
Since the Liberals assert that the rights that men are endowed with are one thing at one moment in time but another at some later period in time—always evolving and based upon the whims of the hearts and minds of their ‘Master Thinkers’—then no man is justified, according to Liberal dogma, to question the moral parameters which Liberal ‘Legislator Leader’ ‘Community Organizer’ ‘Supermen du Jour’ enigmatically gifted with
‘great new insight’ political leaders do at any given moment within their conveniently defined Sitz im Leben dictate as an acceptable right or not acceptable. To do so would be intolerant! Does the immense hypocrisy and insanity of the proponents of the Liberal’s socalled 'reasoning' yet stand out in the light for the reader to see?
Does the danger to your God-given Liberty not stand out in the darkness of the delusional arguments of the Liberals as a light—the light of Liberty?
"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made. In Him was life, and the life was the light of men. And the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it." (John 1: 1-5. NKJV.)
Amazingly, for lack of any sound argument with which to defend said alternate source to the Creator, the Lord Jesus Christ, the nominal Christian, pseudo-Conservative who pretends to be in the camp of the politically conservative Right turns away from the Bible to the same illegitimately constructed concepts of the
Liberal Left's perversions of “Political Correctness,” “Tolerance,” “Pluralism,” “Inclusiveness,” “Multi-culturalism,” “Unity,” “Diversity,” etc., as a replacement moral foundation upon which to attempt to justify their political positions on issues and qualify, according to whatever contemporaneous position upon the continuum of morally relativistic positions they should at any time determine that the rest of us should accept as truth, the extension of certain anything-butunalienable rights unto all men—some men more than others actually—in place of the sure foundation of the Gospel of Jesus Christ upon which this Christian nation, exceptional in all of human history, was founded and has been so richly blessed by God and in place of the Constitution of the United States of America.
The Liberal’s Legislative Leader’ ‘Bright’ ‘Community Organizers’ presume the authority to proclaim as truth whatever their morally relative standards of good and evil theychoose at any given time to recognize as right or
wrong, and assumes—indeed demands and DICTATES—that the rest of society accept their proclaimation of moral status as law.
"The preservation of the sacred fire of liberty, and the destiny of the republican model of government, are...staked on the experiment entrusted to the hands of the American people."—George Washington, First Inaugural Address, 1789.
In the 2014 Mid-term Elections and the 2016 Presidential Election we must demand at every stop that any Republican or Independent, or Libertarian, or Constitution Party candidate makes that they answer—not evade—the following questions, or the
American experiment is in imminent danger of its demise:
A: ‘If elected president will you sign and
Executive Order for a Congressional Committee to investigate within Congress’ ‘informing function,’ or in your capacity as commander-inchief order a Military Tribunal to investigate—in order to address the grievance that the majority of those within the Republican Party have expressed for these last eight years and continue to express—the criminal usurpation of the presidency by an ineligible candidate who fraudulently represented himself in two presidential elections as constitutionally eligible to be president while knowingly not so? And
B: If the investigation by a Congressional
Committee and/or Military Tribunal should determine that a conspiracy to contravene the Constitution has transpired and that Mister Obama, or whatever his legal name should legally be, did criminally usurp the office of the president by fraud, will you, by Executive Order and/or military order RETROACTIVELY ABROGATE the two unconstitutional elections of the fraud and impostor, Mister Barry Soetoro, a.k.a. Barack Hussein Obama, Jr., Bari Shabazz, a.k.a. Harrison J. Bounel, a.k.a. Soebarkah, and RETROACTIVELY ABROGATE everything that he and his illegitimate administration has accomplished while in the commission of high crimes against the Constitution and the American experiment in government of the people?’
The only way in which ‘We the People’ might be able to right this horrendous miscarriage of justice—this mockery of the American experiment in government of the people—may be—if ‘We the People’ are even capable of holding legitimate elections not entirely manipulated by the elitist faction presently controlling BOTH major political parties in America—to
elect a constitutionally eligible president who will
give his word and follow through, honoring the oath he would necessarily take when swearing-in to office to ‘preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States of America,’ and retroactively
abrogate the unconstitutional elections of an enemy agent of Islam who is practicing Islamic taqqiya to the office of the president of the United States.
Islam has an historic practice—a battle tactic— that they call taqqiya wherein adherents of the murderous cult feign being of the same clothe of those within a society under siege by Islam in order to gain advantageous positioning within said society under siege in order to establish advantageous laws meant to facilitate the
cancerous spread of Islam throughout said society.
Taqiyya is an infiltration tactic and nothing short of an act of war—a subtle, deceptive act of war.
The objective of a Muslim practicing taqiyya is the domination of Islam over said society under siege under Sharia law and the relegation of all non-Muslim citizens within said society unto the de facto slave status of dhimmis.
America’s political, military, religious, academic, and economic, leadership have all failed to recognize the threat that an enemy
agent of Islam practicing taqiyya fraudulently representing himself as a constitutionally eligible to be president or vice-president as a natural-born citizen, and subsequently achieving that objective, represents to the very survival of the American experiment in government of the people and to the preservation America’s recognition of Mankind’s God-given Liberty that has defined the Freedom which Americans have realized within the constitutional republic that was passed down to generations of her citizens.
The connections with Obama, serving alongside Bill Ayers as a paid director of the farleft nonprofit Chicago Woods Fund, and providing Hatem Abudayyeh, the executive director of the Arab American Action
Network—not to confuse Arab with Muslim, many Arabs are not Muslim—with financial grants, and the fact that AAAN was founded by a longtime Obama associate, Columbia University Professor Rashid Khalidi, and that Mr. Khalidi’s wife is the president of the Arab American Action Network, compounds the compelling evidence against Obama being constitutionally ineligible to be president which includes a lack of evidence supporting Obama’s claims of having been born in Hawaii, and should make all those concerned with the national security of the United States open their eyes wider and take a second look at the possibility that an enemy agent of Islam has achieved the inconceivable—the criminal usurpation of the presidency while the United States is engaged in a war against pan-Islamic forces united in Civilization Jihad; and that
Obama did not haphazardly achieve such an objective, but only after a lifetime of deceptive preparation.
Aside from all evidence pointing to the fact that Obama is an enemy agent of Islam practicing taqiyya—evidence from his purported birth to a Muslim father from the
British Protectorate of East Africa (present day Kenya); (though card-carrying Communist operative Frank Marshall Davis was most surely his biological father,) his indoctrination into the teachings of the murderous cult while attending Muslim Madras schooling for 6-8 of his formative young years in Indonesia, where, by the way, he was adopted by a Muslim, Lolo Soetoro; evidence like his statement to the N.Y. Times reporter that the most beautiful sound he knows is the sound of the Islamic call to prayer in the evening; His statement that ‘The future does not belong to those who slander the prophet Mohammed;’ the corroborated fact— corroborated by Dr. Jerome Corsi himself—that Mr. Obama prays in Arabic with no noticeable accent to native speakers of the language; Obama’s placement of Muslims in many powerful positions within his illegitimate White
House Administration; etc…, etc…, etc…, is the overwhelmingly compelling evidence of the ‘Manchurian’ Muslim from Mombasa’s DIRECT AID TO OUR ENEMY.
Who else but an enemy agent occupying the Oval Office would even consider providing the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt with F-16 Fighter Jets and M1-Abrams Main Battle Tanks. Undoubtedly the Benghazi scandal involves weapons to Islamic Jihadists too.
The depths of Obama’s deception cannot now be fathomed. Many Americans are convinced that Osama Bin Laden was not killed in Pakistan by the US Navy’s Seal Team Six. There were reliable reports from Behazir Bhutto in her famous interview with David Frost that Osama had long been dead when the Seal Team Six raid took place. Ms. Bhutto was
assassinated aproximately one month after the interview with David Frost.
The Seal Team Six raid to supposedly get Osama provided Obama with a much needed lift in the polls before he was illegally elected for the second time. Osama is today the number one name given to male children born in Pakistan. Many Muslims rallied around the anti-American Jihad following Osama’s purported death at the hands of Seal Team Six and the vast majority of the unit involved in the mission to kill Osama have died—many under most suspicious circumstances including one officer who supposedly committed suicide.
There are no witnesses to the reverential burial given Osama aboard a US Navy aircraft
carrier. How nice that Obama had the purported corpse of Osama ceremonially washed and wrapped in traditional Muslim white linen. Ambassador Stevens was dragged through the streets of Benghazi, raped and beaten to death. The Blackhawk helicopter pilot’s body being dragged through the streets of Mogadishu with the barrel of a rifle inserted into his rectum comes to mind.
Many of those “Skinnies” who attacked our Marines who were delivering aid were AlQaeda trained. It’s nice to know that Obama treats Muslim prisoners so well, isn’t it?
Consider the former US Army Major who shot down all those troops on Fort Hood, “Major” Hassan. Are the courts still discussing whether or not the poor Muslim “Major” has to shave his beard off or not? Funny, they came to the decision that none of the killed or wounded in the poor “Major’s” jihadist attack are to receive the Purple Heart.
Imagine if you will, the damage that Obama has wrought upon the national security of the United States, Israel, and the rest of the free world. American lives will be lost in battle 50, even 100 years from now on account of Obama's usurpation of the presidency. He has access to information that will be benefiting our Islamic enemy for generations.
Obama needs to be taken into custody, charged with fraudulently representing himself as eligible to be president, interrogated (waterboarding has proven highly successful with Islamic enemy agents), and then locked away in the same prison cell in Fort Leavenworth,
Kansas where former US Army Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, now Dr. Lakin, was imprisoned for simply requesting—consistent with his officer’s oath to defend the Constitution—authentication that his purported commander-in-chief did in fact truly, legally occupy said position. Then Mister Obama produced the forged documents and presented them to the American people— and nobody in authority or the effectively state-run media dared to check said documents out.
Collectivist, that is to say Marxist, LiberalSocialist, ‘Progressive,’ political ideology embraced by the Democrat Party is only a stepping stone for Obama in order for him to pave the way for Islamic infiltration to proceed down the path more rapidly. Obama is a
Muslim. Nothing could be clearer. His ultimate objective is the advance of Islam within American culture and around the world. His aim is to establish Islam on equal footing in America until such time as it can dominate the society and relegate all non-Muslims to the de facto slave status of dhimmi.
Dinesh D’ Souza argues in his film '2016' that Obama is a Marxist and attempts to support his postulation by pointing out that although the "Kenyan" father was not there— an absentee father if ever there was one—he had an enormous influence on the young Obama vicariously through the things that young Obama's mother shared with him about his long-lost 'Baby Daddy.'
D’ Souza’s argument doesn't hold water on face value; next to the 6-8 years of indoctrination that young Obama endured in Indonesia into the cult of Islam it is not logical that the vicarious Marxist exposure through his mother should be given more weight in terms of its influence on the young bastard child of aspiring porn star Ann Dunham than the obviously greater influence of Islamic indoctrination under the first real—and present in his life—father figure in 'Bath House' Barry's formative young years—Islamic Imams and teachers at the Muslim madras school he attended.
Those who would defend the Constitution are disgusted in their elected representatives for failure to take action agains the
‘Manchurian’ Muslim from Mombasa’s criminal usurpation of the presidency. There is one way that the truth can be forced into the light of day and action taken against the criminal usurper and all those complicit in his conspiracy to contravene the Constitution: It’s going to require that articles continue to be written— that investigative journalists continue to uncover the conspiracies against Liberty and that the story is not allowed to die.
Consider if you please, however unlikely— and I realize that the odds are against us as surely as they were against Washington and the Colonial Army when they faced the most powerful nation in the world, Great Britain— the possibility of people like you and I electing against the combined force of the Republican
and Democrat wings of the one-party cabal presently controlling the political landscape of our country, a true American; one who believes that all men are endowed by their Creator, the Lord Jesus Christ of the Bible, with certain unalienable Rights including the right to Liberty,
I suggest Dr. Ben Carson with Dr. Terry Lee Lakin as his vice-presidential running mate, promise to sign,
and that said man, once elected to office, a presidential Executive Order for a military investigation into the criminal usurpation of the position (I
understand that technically it is not a military officer's rank) of commander-in-chief. The cowards in Congress could be by-passed.
All those complicit in the criminal usurpation of the presidency and the broader conspiracy to contravene the Constitution including media entities who have diligently covered up the crime, could be taken into military custody and face a military tribunal and, if found guilty of treason, hung by the neck until dead.
Still, we should be gearing up to push a political agenda wherein we would aim for as many organizations as possible to embrace as a condition of their supporting any candidate that that candidate publicly announce their
unreserved demand for a congressional
investigation into the usurpation of the presidency by an ineligible candidate who fraudulently represented himself as eligible and subsequently engaged in a massive cover-up.
We need a presidential candidate who will stand up and say 'If I am elected president I will, by executive order if necessary, demand that the college records of Barack Obama be subjected to forensic analysis along with all documents he has submitted as purported evidence of his constitutional eligibility to have been president and any other records, such as his passport records, which may reflect on an enormous crime having been committed
against the American experiment in government of the people, a crime of unparalleled proportions.
Obama’s ‘Baby Daddy’
Obama’s ‘Baby Momma.’
"Within the context of the war in which Judeo-Christian culture, including the United States, is engaged in against the world domination agenda of the barbaric cult of Islam, the criminal usurpation by fraud of the presidency of the United States by a self-proclaimed committed Muslim establishes said enemy agent of Islam practicing taqqiya as a real and present threat to the national security of the United States. The 'Manchurian' Muslim from Mombasa, Mr. Barack 'King’ Hussein Obama, Jr., a.k.a. Harrison J. Bounel, a.k.a. Soebarkah, a.k.a. Bari Shabazz, a.k.a. 'Bath House Barry' Soetoro, along with all others complicit in the criminal usurpation of the presidency and/or the ongoing cover-up of said most sinister crime perpetrated against the American experiment in “government of the people” in our nation’s history—what amounts to nothing less than an ongoing conspiracy to contravene the Constitution— have defined themselves as legitimate targets of opportunity for journalistic attack."—Chris Farrell,
PETITION TO ABROGATE
PETITION TO ABROGATE
By Christopher T. Farrell NOLA, USA. ANNO DOMINI MMXIII
I, the undersigned American citizen, demand that the unconstitutional election of an ineligible candidate, Mr. Barack Hussein Obama Jr., also known as Barry Soetoro, Harrison J. Bounel, and Soebarkah, who fraudulently represented himself as constitutionally eligible to campaign for the office of President of the United States in two presidential elections while knowingly not so, and has presented ‘We the People’ with forged documents including multiple birth certificates and a fraudulent Selective Service Registration Card in a conspiratorial cover-up of his sinister contravention of the Constitution, be retroactively abrogated forthwith along with all that his illegitimate administration has illegally accomplished while complicit in the crime of the unconstitutional usurpation of the presidency by fraud including the illegal appointment of two individuals to the Supreme Court.
Printed Name: _________________________________ Signature: _________________________________ Date: ______ /__________ / Anno Domini 2013 Mailing Address: _______________________________________ _______________________________________ _______________________________________ _______________ E-Mail: ______________________________________
Sheriff Joe Arpaio
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue listening from where you left off, or restart the preview.