U.S.

Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review

Board ofImmigration Appeals Office of the Clerk
510 7 Leesburg Pike. Suite 2000 Falls Church. Virginia 20530

Suntoso, Priscillia, Esq. 7811 46 th Avenue Elmhurst, NY 11373

OHS/ICE Office of Chief Counsel - BOS P.O. Box 8728 Boston, MA 02114

Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center | www.irac.net

Name: PIETRYSZCZ, MAGDALENA

A 098-236-466

Date of this notice: 10/31/2013

Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision and order in the above-referenced case. Sincerely,

DOWtL ct1/1A)
Donna Carr Chief Clerk

Enclosure Panel Members: Kendall-Clark, Molly

williame Userteam: Docket

For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished

Cite as: Magdalena Pietryszcz, A098 236 466 (BIA Oct. 31, 2013)

U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Falls Church, Virginia 20530

Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals

File:

A098 236 466 -Boston, MA

Date:

OCT 312013

In re: MAGDALENA PIETRYSZCZ

IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS APPEAL AND MOTION ONBEHALF OF RESPONDENT: ONBEHALF OF DHS: Priscillia Suntoso, Esquire

Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center | www.irac.net

Frank Crowley Office of the Chief Counsel

APPLICATION: Administrative closure

This case is before the Board pursuant to a June 24, 2013, order of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit which remanded the case to the Board to provide the parties an opportunity to seek administrative closure. The parties, on remand, have submitted a joint motion to administratively close these proceedings in the exercise of the Department of Homeland Security's prosecutorial discretion. The motion will be granted, and the proceedings

administratively closed. 1

If either party to this case wishes to reinstate the proceedings, a written request to reinstate the proceedings may be made to the Board. The Board will take no further action in the case
unless a request is received from one of the parties. The request must be submitted directly to

the Clerk's Office, without fee, but with certification of service on the opposing party. Accordingly, the following order will be entered. ORDER: The proceedings before the Board of hnmigration Appeals administratively closed.
m

this case are

F R THEBOARD

1 The First Circuit remanded this matter to the Board, but also stated it retained jurisdiction over the respondent's petition. The parties should advise the First Circuit of the entry of this Board

order.

Cite as: Magdalena Pietryszcz, A098 236 466 (BIA Oct. 31, 2013)

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful